Missing schoolgirl Megan found (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Megan and teacher found in France
2:01pm Friday 28th September 2012 in News By Echo Reporter
Megan Stammers
MISSING schoolgirl Megan Stammers and her teacher Jeremy Forrest have been found in France, police said today.
The 15-year-old has been taken into protection and Forrest, 30, has been arrested.
They were found at around 12.15pm today UK time.
Police would not reveal the exact location.
The pair were both ''safe and well'', a spokesman for Sussex Police said.
Forrest has been arrested on suspicion of child abduction.
They were found as a result of information that came after the case received media coverage in France, police said.
Forrest and Megan's families have been informed and arrangements will be made for their return to the UK, the force added.
French media reported that the pair were found in Bordeaux.
The alarm was raised when Megan, from Eastbourne, East Sussex, failed to go to school a week ago and it was discovered that she had travelled with Forrest on a ferry from Dover to Calais the previous evening.
They had tickets to return to the UK on Sunday, but did not use them.
Both their families made emotional appeals for their return, with Mr Forrest's father Jim, of Petts Wood, south east London, begging his son or the teenager yesterday to call or email home.
On Monday the 15-year-old's mother Danielle Wilson, sitting beside stepfather Martin Stammers, also pleaded for her safe return.
There were reported sightings of the pair in Paris, and Sussex Police received seven phone calls with information after Megan's disappearance was featured on the BBC's Crimewatch last night.
Comments(57)
MGRA
says...
2:29pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid
says...
2:34pm Fri 28 Sep 12
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
hulla baloo
says...
2:36pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:Not meant to be a joke, just asking the question.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
ToastyTea
says...
2:46pm Fri 28 Sep 12
sotonwinch09
says...
3:08pm Fri 28 Sep 12
kingdong41
says...
3:24pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid
says...
3:38pm Fri 28 Sep 12
hulla baloo wrote:You won't fool anyone with that lame excuse, hulla baloney !
BillyTheKid wrote:Not meant to be a joke, just asking the question.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
Chav comment, top of the pile, designed to set the other idiots off who will follow with similar jokes and puns.
Oh, and no I am not a pedophile sympathiser, which is what someone will say. No matter what mitigating circumstances are eventually put forward at his trial, it would appear at this stage he left the country with an underage child without the consent of her family. And that is both legally and morally wrong.
Whether it turns out that he is a deceitful predator, or simply a foolish, impulsive man, the consequences will be equally severe, and it will be for life. It sends out a clear message to anyone who thinks they can get away with this kind of behaviour.
Vix1
says...
3:57pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Shoong
says...
4:01pm Fri 28 Sep 12
(get ready to duck)
Huffter
says...
4:04pm Fri 28 Sep 12
peter.maidment
says...
4:05pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:rightly or wrongly i think hulla baloo was just getting at that he will only get about three years,,,, not in the best taste i know, but the way our legal system works now a days it would not surprise me
hulla baloo wrote:You won't fool anyone with that lame excuse, hulla baloney !
BillyTheKid wrote:Not meant to be a joke, just asking the question.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
Chav comment, top of the pile, designed to set the other idiots off who will follow with similar jokes and puns.
Oh, and no I am not a pedophile sympathiser, which is what someone will say. No matter what mitigating circumstances are eventually put forward at his trial, it would appear at this stage he left the country with an underage child without the consent of her family. And that is both legally and morally wrong.
Whether it turns out that he is a deceitful predator, or simply a foolish, impulsive man, the consequences will be equally severe, and it will be for life. It sends out a clear message to anyone who thinks they can get away with this kind of behaviour.
Maine Lobster
says...
4:09pm Fri 28 Sep 12
I have no sympathy for the stupid teacher who thought he could do this, but it was clear this was a teacher/pupil crush situation that got way out of hand some time before they fled..
How it wasn't dealt with before this when they were known to be closer than is appropriate, has to be questionned.
The teacher should have been suspended pending the investigation that was allegedly being udertaken by the school. The head teacher will, I'm sure, be under some pressure in the near future!
sarfhamton
says...
4:12pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Shoong wrote:I do think this is all a bit overblown though
I'll get a severe pelting for this but... was she ever in any danger..?
(get ready to duck)
Linesman
says...
4:19pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:With your comment, I don't think that you are in a position to call anyone sick.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
Shoong
says...
4:26pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Linesman wrote:I wouldn't reply to BTK's comments, it might be the one sends him over the edge. Not joking.
BillyTheKid wrote:With your comment, I don't think that you are in a position to call anyone sick.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
freefinker
says...
4:39pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Shoong wrote:.. no severe pelting so far.
I'll get a severe pelting for this but... was she ever in any danger..?
(get ready to duck)
And you are right (even though you present your thoughts as a question).
Whatever the wrongs and wrongs of this case (I can't see any rights), I doubt she was ever in physical danger.
Never right for a teacher to do what this one has done, but that aside, in other societies (including many within Europe) their respective ages would not present any legal problems.
BillyTheKid
says...
4:47pm Fri 28 Sep 12
The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ?
I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.
Georgem
says...
4:51pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:Nobody cares, Billy.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
Georgem
says...
4:51pm Fri 28 Sep 12
peter.maidment wrote:Billy is just trolling. Ignore him, he's an idiot.
BillyTheKid wrote:rightly or wrongly i think hulla baloo was just getting at that he will only get about three years,,,, not in the best taste i know, but the way our legal system works now a days it would not surprise me
hulla baloo wrote:You won't fool anyone with that lame excuse, hulla baloney !
BillyTheKid wrote:Not meant to be a joke, just asking the question.
hulla baloo wrote:None if he commits suicide rather than face the rest of his life as a convicted pedophile.
MATHS TEST: - If a 30 year old teacher takes a 15 year old pupil 120 miles to France at an average speed of 40 miles per hour, how many years will he get in prison?
Now your pathetic joke doesn't look so funny, does it ? You sick idiot !
Chav comment, top of the pile, designed to set the other idiots off who will follow with similar jokes and puns.
Oh, and no I am not a pedophile sympathiser, which is what someone will say. No matter what mitigating circumstances are eventually put forward at his trial, it would appear at this stage he left the country with an underage child without the consent of her family. And that is both legally and morally wrong.
Whether it turns out that he is a deceitful predator, or simply a foolish, impulsive man, the consequences will be equally severe, and it will be for life. It sends out a clear message to anyone who thinks they can get away with this kind of behaviour.
Georgem
says...
4:53pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:Of course you can't. That would suggest the presence of an imagination.
Parents have enough to worry about in connection with their children and the internet, drugs, and bullying without the added concern that their teenage daughter might be whisked away by one of her teachers.
The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ?
I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.
Georgem
says...
5:00pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Shoong wrote:Well, not danger as such, no.
I'll get a severe pelting for this but... was she ever in any danger..?
(get ready to duck)
City Saint
says...
5:02pm Fri 28 Sep 12
kingdong41 wrote:Hmmm, you might want to think of a new internet name, since you seem to be on the side of decency in the world.
How would anyone feel if it wss there kids? 15 16 17 18 she had gone away i would want mine bk sort it out it aint right is it safety is 1st who do we trust?????? No1 its ourselfs just b glad when she is home safe and not being groomed
I don't know which part of town you are from, but in most neighbourhoods your name would be ultra-dodgy, lol.
Of course if you are in fact the regent of some Danish principalilty with an unfortunate name, carry on. Live and let live, and all that.
City Saint
says...
5:07pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:Good on you, George. All these holier-than-thou pollyannas on the DE website really do put a downer on things.
BillyTheKid wrote: Parents have enough to worry about in connection with their children and the internet, drugs, and bullying without the added concern that their teenage daughter might be whisked away by one of her teachers. The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ? I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.Of course you can't. That would suggest the presence of an imagination.
hulla baloo, very amusing post to open the thread. Nice one.
What would Britain be if stripped of its sense of humour? The Czech Republic?
City Saint
says...
5:07pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:Good on you, George. All these holier-than-thou pollyannas on the DE website really do put a downer on things.
BillyTheKid wrote: Parents have enough to worry about in connection with their children and the internet, drugs, and bullying without the added concern that their teenage daughter might be whisked away by one of her teachers. The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ? I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.Of course you can't. That would suggest the presence of an imagination.
hulla baloo, very amusing post to open the thread. Nice one.
What would Britain be if stripped of its sense of humour? The Czech Republic?
Georgem
says...
5:16pm Fri 28 Sep 12
City Saint wrote:BillyTheKid likes to feign disgust at jokes made in relation to serious subjects. It's one of his favourite drama-generating techniques.
Georgem wrote:Good on you, George. All these holier-than-thou pollyannas on the DE website really do put a downer on things.
BillyTheKid wrote: Parents have enough to worry about in connection with their children and the internet, drugs, and bullying without the added concern that their teenage daughter might be whisked away by one of her teachers. The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ? I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.Of course you can't. That would suggest the presence of an imagination.
hulla baloo, very amusing post to open the thread. Nice one.
What would Britain be if stripped of its sense of humour? The Czech Republic?
I hope he's feigning, anyway. Most people are perfectly capable of seeing humour in a situation, whilst also accommodating the gravity of it.
BillyTheKid
says...
5:18pm Fri 28 Sep 12
City Saint wrote:What a stupid attitude. Immature, just like that idiot Georgem.
Georgem wrote:Good on you, George. All these holier-than-thou pollyannas on the DE website really do put a downer on things.
BillyTheKid wrote: Parents have enough to worry about in connection with their children and the internet, drugs, and bullying without the added concern that their teenage daughter might be whisked away by one of her teachers. The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ? I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.Of course you can't. That would suggest the presence of an imagination.
hulla baloo, very amusing post to open the thread. Nice one.
What would Britain be if stripped of its sense of humour? The Czech Republic?
Getting ready to wreck another thread, Georgey, you old girly tart !
Georgem
says...
5:22pm Fri 28 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:I don't wreck threads, Billy. That's your trick. It's ALL you do. Oh, you spent a week or two keeping your head down, got left alone just as you asked, but then you presumably ran out of jerking off material and decided it was time for more delicious drama.
City Saint wrote:What a stupid attitude. Immature, just like that idiot Georgem.
Georgem wrote:Good on you, George. All these holier-than-thou pollyannas on the DE website really do put a downer on things.
BillyTheKid wrote: Parents have enough to worry about in connection with their children and the internet, drugs, and bullying without the added concern that their teenage daughter might be whisked away by one of her teachers. The child is 15, probably in year 11, and should be focussing on her coursework and GCSE exams. How is she going to do that with all this going on, and the teacher's trial proabably coming up just after Christmas ? I can't imagine what it must be like in that school, or in that local community right now.Of course you can't. That would suggest the presence of an imagination.
hulla baloo, very amusing post to open the thread. Nice one.
What would Britain be if stripped of its sense of humour? The Czech Republic?
Getting ready to wreck another thread, Georgey, you old girly tart !
MGRA
says...
5:29pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Georgem
says...
5:34pm Fri 28 Sep 12
MGRA wrote:Well, she's below the age of consent, so legally, technically - but not in reality - she's incapable of consensually indulging in any, err, amorous behaviour with the guy, ergo, any such behaviour would have been forced. Nonsense, really, but like you said, this was never going to end any other way. Nobody's going to say "Well, good luck to the teacher and the pupil he absconded with"
I am not sure why people thought her "safety" was ever in doubt !?!? The stupid teacher eloped with a minor true, but it was not likely in this case that any harm would have come to her. Although having said that , he must have a bit of screw loose to think this was going to end anyway other than the way it has...
MGRA
says...
6:15pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:this is complicated though because as she is over 14, she is viewed differently under french law.... It would not surprise me if the French have to release him.... I am not sure how European arrest warrants work, if he has committed no crime in France, does the UK have to apply for extradicion ?
MGRA wrote:Well, she's below the age of consent, so legally, technically - but not in reality - she's incapable of consensually indulging in any, err, amorous behaviour with the guy, ergo, any such behaviour would have been forced. Nonsense, really, but like you said, this was never going to end any other way. Nobody's going to say "Well, good luck to the teacher and the pupil he absconded with"
I am not sure why people thought her "safety" was ever in doubt !?!? The stupid teacher eloped with a minor true, but it was not likely in this case that any harm would have come to her. Although having said that , he must have a bit of screw loose to think this was going to end anyway other than the way it has...
saint robbie
says...
6:26pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Shoong wrote:I wonder how many months untill she is 16?? Why didnt they just wait??
I'll get a severe pelting for this but... was she ever in any danger..? (get ready to duck)
J.P.M
says...
7:10pm Fri 28 Sep 12
jojotgirl
says...
7:32pm Fri 28 Sep 12
freefinker wrote:I don't think she was ever in any danger. I'm glad she's been found but never doubted she would be "safe and well". It's time to hear some proper news now and stop glorifying a naughty little girl and her perv teachers flight of fancy day in, day out. I'm afraid that as a mother of teenagers I just don't buy that she didn't know that her own behaviour as much as the perv teacher's was completely unacceptable.
Shoong wrote:.. no severe pelting so far.
I'll get a severe pelting for this but... was she ever in any danger..?
(get ready to duck)
And you are right (even though you present your thoughts as a question).
Whatever the wrongs and wrongs of this case (I can't see any rights), I doubt she was ever in physical danger.
Never right for a teacher to do what this one has done, but that aside, in other societies (including many within Europe) their respective ages would not present any legal problems.
OSPREYSAINT
says...
7:34pm Fri 28 Sep 12
on the rocks
says...
7:46pm Fri 28 Sep 12
They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception.
But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along.
If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world.
She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear.
Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest.
The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke.
He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16.
He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.
skin2000
says...
7:52pm Fri 28 Sep 12
on the rocks wrote:I think that you are totally right
It must be a slow time with the news.
They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception.
But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along.
If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world.
She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear.
Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest.
The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke.
He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16.
He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.
J.P.M
says...
7:54pm Fri 28 Sep 12
skin2000 wrote:P55d0 luvver?
on the rocks wrote:I think that you are totally right
It must be a slow time with the news.
They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception.
But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along.
If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world.
She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear.
Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest.
The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke.
He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16.
He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.
skin2000
says...
8:08pm Fri 28 Sep 12
J.P.M wrote:No
skin2000 wrote:P55d0 luvver?
on the rocks wrote:I think that you are totally right
It must be a slow time with the news.
They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception.
But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along.
If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world.
She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear.
Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest.
The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke.
He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16.
He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.
Brite Spark
says...
8:09pm Fri 28 Sep 12
MGRA
says...
8:56pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Brite Spark wrote:that will be a half..... or the amount of time of his sentence he will actually serve....
As a maths teacher he was possibly showing her how many times 30 goes into 15!
Georgem
says...
9:50pm Fri 28 Sep 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Not really, no.
You couldn't write this stuff could you? Hang on a minute Romeo and Juliet? Similar.
Georgem
says...
9:51pm Fri 28 Sep 12
J.P.M wrote:Do you even know what that word means?
skin2000 wrote:P55d0 luvver?
on the rocks wrote:I think that you are totally right
It must be a slow time with the news.
They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception.
But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along.
If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world.
She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear.
Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest.
The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke.
He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16.
He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.
J.P.M
says...
10:13pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:Noy by experience - are you going to teach me big boy?
J.P.M wrote:Do you even know what that word means?
skin2000 wrote:P55d0 luvver?
on the rocks wrote:I think that you are totally right
It must be a slow time with the news.
They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception.
But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along.
If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world.
She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear.
Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest.
The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke.
He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16.
He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.
Vix1
says...
10:22pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Laura85
says...
12:22am Sat 29 Sep 12
Georgem
says...
1:15am Sat 29 Sep 12
Vix1 wrote:Incorrect.
any man/woman who has sex with a minor is a paedophile!! There is NEVER an excuse, whether she consented or not!! It's about time Britain got itself a moral backbone!
dogbruce
says...
5:37am Sat 29 Sep 12
Feel sorry for the pair of them
OSPREYSAINT
says...
8:17am Sat 29 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:Better ending hopefully.
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Not really, no.
You couldn't write this stuff could you? Hang on a minute Romeo and Juliet? Similar.
Scrutinizer
says...
10:11am Sat 29 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:Firstly, the teacher should not have allowed himself to have got into this situation. He's clearly broken British law, the school rules etc, and that is plain. Now, as to whether he should be treated the same as if this girl was say, 13, no, not in my view. I can't imagine even the so-called experts believing that this girl, at age 15, is going to be significantly any more mature of body/and or mind in a few months, when she will be 16, to make a difference to the extent to how she is/would be affected. So, I do think that should be taken into account when he is sentenced. However, I believe he really must be punished with a fairly severe sentence, on account of his obvious contravention of the law as it presently stands, and also because trust is absolutely vital in a teacher-pupil-parent
J.P.M wrote:Sure. Bend over, oh, and bite on this cos I'm going in dry, and repeat after me "Paedophilia is sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children". It does amuse me when people loudly demonstrate that they learn most of their vocabulary from tabloid papers.Georgem wrote:Noy by experience - are you going to teach me big boy?J.P.M wrote:Do you even know what that word means?skin2000 wrote:P55d0 luvver?on the rocks wrote: It must be a slow time with the news. They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception. But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along. If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world. She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear. Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest. The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke. He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16. He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.I think that you are totally right
-school relationship.
Beer Monster
says...
10:33am Sat 29 Sep 12
saint robbie wrote:I believe that the situation had become so renowned in the community in which they lived that he was about to lose his job on principle. It was an act of desperation.
Shoong wrote:I wonder how many months untill she is 16?? Why didnt they just wait??
I'll get a severe pelting for this but... was she ever in any danger..? (get ready to duck)
Glad to hear she's okay, but the thing that gets me is that her parents didn't seem to mind what was going on (before they left the country) - not once had they called on the UK Police to claim that she had been kidnapped, and hence they could have issued an arrest warrant. Sounds silly I know, but maybe they had been willing to let them get on with it once she'd hit 16.
Beer Monster
says...
10:53am Sat 29 Sep 12
Just read that sentence back and realised that it doesn't make sense. Apologies grammar police.
Georgem
says...
11:40am Sat 29 Sep 12
Scrutinizer wrote:Agreed.
Georgem wrote:Firstly, the teacher should not have allowed himself to have got into this situation. He's clearly broken British law, the school rules etc, and that is plain. Now, as to whether he should be treated the same as if this girl was say, 13, no, not in my view. I can't imagine even the so-called experts believing that this girl, at age 15, is going to be significantly any more mature of body/and or mind in a few months, when she will be 16, to make a difference to the extent to how she is/would be affected. So, I do think that should be taken into account when he is sentenced. However, I believe he really must be punished with a fairly severe sentence, on account of his obvious contravention of the law as it presently stands, and also because trust is absolutely vital in a teacher-pupil-parent
J.P.M wrote:Sure. Bend over, oh, and bite on this cos I'm going in dry, and repeat after me "Paedophilia is sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children". It does amuse me when people loudly demonstrate that they learn most of their vocabulary from tabloid papers.Georgem wrote:Noy by experience - are you going to teach me big boy?J.P.M wrote:Do you even know what that word means?skin2000 wrote:P55d0 luvver?on the rocks wrote: It must be a slow time with the news. They have arrested the guy for abduction, that is taking someone by force or deception. But she wasn't taken by force and she will have known what she was doing all along. If she were 5 years-old then she wouldn't know but the girl is 15. In a few months they could have cleared off and stuck 2 fingers up at the world. She was never in danger so why the media puts she is now safe is unclear. Why didn't and why doesn't the media report all the gang rapes on girls as young as 10, instead of pretending it isn't happening in case it might cause interracial unrest. The girl will have wanted to go with this bloke. He was dumb to have done it, if they were so keen they should have waited a few months until she was 16. He isn't a paedophile, he just stupid.I think that you are totally right
-school relationship.
J.P.M
says...
12:18pm Sat 29 Sep 12
Georgem wrote:YES IT IS CORRECT - AND YOU NEED TO STOP HIDING IN YOUR PERVERTED WORLD OF FANTASY
Vix1 wrote:Incorrect.
any man/woman who has sex with a minor is a paedophile!! There is NEVER an excuse, whether she consented or not!! It's about time Britain got itself a moral backbone!
Georgem
says...
1:03pm Sat 29 Sep 12
J.P.M wrote:Good, good, let all that pent up rage out. You'll feel better.
Georgem wrote:YES IT IS CORRECT - AND YOU NEED TO STOP HIDING IN YOUR PERVERTED WORLD OF FANTASY
Vix1 wrote:Incorrect.
any man/woman who has sex with a minor is a paedophile!! There is NEVER an excuse, whether she consented or not!! It's about time Britain got itself a moral backbone!
Georgem
says...
2:50pm Sat 29 Sep 12
Shoong
says...
9:24pm Sat 29 Sep 12
BillyTheKid wrote:Yay, I have a fan!
Georgem deliberately throws spanners in the works to get attention. Look how many posts he's made here, none of which make any valid point.
This is my last week-end on this site. Wonder who Georgem will pick on next ? Oh look, everybody ! He's already started on JPM !
Good luck, JPM ! It'll be fine as long as you can cope when his little friends join in, highjack the thread, and try to blame you. And watch out for Doctor Shoong predicting your imminent mental collapse !
In some ways I shall miss this site, but it is beginning to take up too much time.
By the way, JPM, Georgem hates to be called BIGELOW ! Mr Bigelow is the dwarf in Ray Bradbury's story who visits a hall of mirrors regularly because it makes him look normal and feel better about himself.
And poor old Georgem does NEED to feel better about himself, everybody. He's had a tough week with ole Billy giving him hell, and taking the attention away that he so desperately wants.
I wonder if Georgem has got the strength of character to ignore my post, like he keeps advising everyone else to do ?
hulla baloo says...
2:19pm Fri 28 Sep 12