Hampshire TV star Esther Rantzen urged to stand down from charity over Savile rumours

Calls for Esther Rantzen to quit charity over Savile rumours Calls for Esther Rantzen to quit charity over Savile rumours

HAMPSHIRE TV star Esther Rantzen last night tried to distance herself from the controversy surrounding Jimmy Savile as she faces new calls to resign from a charity.

The founder of ChildLine, who lives in Bramshaw in the New Forest, said she could not recall ever having a conversation with abuse campaigner Shy Keenan about rumour's of Savile's serial sex abuse of young girls.

But the allegations that she failed to act 18 years ago has led the National Association for People Abused in Childhood to consider her position as patron of the charity.

However, the veteran broadcaster insisted that while she did hear rumours, she never heard or saw any evidence and would have acted upon it if she had.

Ms Rantzen said: “I don't mean any disrespect to the lady but I don't remember any conversation with her.

“I have had a great many conversations with people over the years and whenever possible I have investigated what people told me and told the police and social services.

“I never heard anything from a child or from anyone who worked with him. The rumours I heard were from people who never met him and they could have easily been as false as they were true.

“If we had any sort of evidence we would have reported it immediately to the police.”

Police have revealed that Savile's alleged catalogue of abuse could have spanned six decades and have so far identified around 60 potential victims, including two from Hampshire.

The scandal has mushroomed since ITV screened a documentary in which five women alleged they were abused by the late DJ and broadcaster and the BBC have announced two inquiries will be launched into the allegations.

Comments(24)

hulla baloo says...
7:58am Mon 15 Oct 12

True or false, rumours of this magnitude and severity deserve to be investigated. If she did know more than she is letting on, then she is no better than he is for allowing it to continue unchallenged.

St Retford says...
9:22am Mon 15 Oct 12

90% of the people in this country were aware there were rumours about Savile and we did nothing either. Why? Because, like Rantzen, we had no evidence either. Should we all have to resign from our jobs as well?

sotonboy84 says...
9:26am Mon 15 Oct 12

hulla baloo wrote:
True or false, rumours of this magnitude and severity deserve to be investigated. If she did know more than she is letting on, then she is no better than he is for allowing it to continue unchallenged.
But we don't know if she knew more, that's just speculation on your behalf.
She said that she had only heard rumours from people that had never met Sir Jimmy.

sotonboy84 says...
9:28am Mon 15 Oct 12

St Retford wrote:
90% of the people in this country were aware there were rumours about Savile and we did nothing either. Why? Because, like Rantzen, we had no evidence either. Should we all have to resign from our jobs as well?
Spot on.

Lockssmart says...
9:37am Mon 15 Oct 12

Can't stand the woman.

hulla baloo says...
9:41am Mon 15 Oct 12

sotonboy84 wrote:
hulla baloo wrote:
True or false, rumours of this magnitude and severity deserve to be investigated. If she did know more than she is letting on, then she is no better than he is for allowing it to continue unchallenged.
But we don't know if she knew more, that's just speculation on your behalf.
She said that she had only heard rumours from people that had never met Sir Jimmy.
She is on a personal public image damage limitation exercise. In her day, she was quite a powerful person and opened many doors to important people. I feel sure she knows a lot more than she is letting on, but kept quiet for her own career, probably the same as many others did.

Here, There says...
9:57am Mon 15 Oct 12

As pointed out above rumours were rife about Saville, however, she was in a position as one of the broadcasters biggest stars along with her own campaign to expose or at least investigate further with resources at her disposal, yes the alleged victims had the Police as a resource but many seemed complicit and should be ashamed of their ignorance, so in my opinion she should not be an ambassador for a Charity that seeks to protect Children.

Huey says...
10:06am Mon 15 Oct 12

She was in on it all for sure.

mbetts says...
10:21am Mon 15 Oct 12

Who remembers her fellow presenters on thats life????? Dooooooodgy!!!!!!

Frank28 says...
10:42am Mon 15 Oct 12

If she really cares about children, she could have acted upon the rumours when she was enjoying powerful status at the BBC. Her inaction and poor memory show you what a week and pathetic woman she really is.

The Wickham Man says...
11:03am Mon 15 Oct 12

I agree with Hulla Balloo and St Retford. But I am also tired of this prurient revisionism that takes place where we try and force the sophistications of the present onto the past. You would have to lock up most adult males from the seventies if you simply apply the standards of the present. This is soon going to turn into a stampede of thousands of claims that is going to obscure the cases of those women who are victims even by the standards of the time.

freefinker says...
11:16am Mon 15 Oct 12

.. interesting to see what a few current regulars said at the time of his death.

http://www.dailyecho
.co.uk/news/9333859.
Jimmy_Savile_dies/

The Wickham Man says...
12:22pm Mon 15 Oct 12

freefinker wrote:
.. interesting to see what a few current regulars said at the time of his death.

http://www.dailyecho

.co.uk/news/9333859.

Jimmy_Savile_dies/
Why is it "interesting"? Do you intend to draw some kind of conclusion that everyone knew all about his private life and were keeping it quiet? Do you imagine all those posters were prescient? Or that they had access to all the celebrity inside info that nobody else had? What a bizarre conspiracy-riddled person you must be.

freefinker says...
12:25pm Mon 15 Oct 12

The Wickham Man wrote:
freefinker wrote:
.. interesting to see what a few current regulars said at the time of his death.

http://www.dailyecho


.co.uk/news/9333859.


Jimmy_Savile_dies/
Why is it "interesting"? Do you intend to draw some kind of conclusion that everyone knew all about his private life and were keeping it quiet? Do you imagine all those posters were prescient? Or that they had access to all the celebrity inside info that nobody else had? What a bizarre conspiracy-riddled person you must be.
.. no, that's entirely YOUR conclusion.

Lone Ranger. says...
12:49pm Mon 15 Oct 12

The Wickham Man wrote:
freefinker wrote:
.. interesting to see what a few current regulars said at the time of his death.

http://www.dailyecho


.co.uk/news/9333859.


Jimmy_Savile_dies/
Why is it "interesting"? Do you intend to draw some kind of conclusion that everyone knew all about his private life and were keeping it quiet? Do you imagine all those posters were prescient? Or that they had access to all the celebrity inside info that nobody else had? What a bizarre conspiracy-riddled person you must be.
Slightly over the top reaction.
.
I just saw it as posting on someone who had been considered as a bit of a good bloke .................... Obviously had people known then what thwy know now then the comments would have been different.
.
As for Ester ........... making her a bit of a scapegoat a bit unfair ........ Axs there are now a number of well known people that had ideas that all was not correct ...... but said nothing

sass says...
1:09pm Mon 15 Oct 12

St Retford wrote:
90% of the people in this country were aware there were rumours about Savile and we did nothing either. Why? Because, like Rantzen, we had no evidence either. Should we all have to resign from our jobs as well?
So the only ones who didn't hear these rumours were the police?

Carthage says...
1:39pm Mon 15 Oct 12

It's not just the Savile case she was aware of and did not act, she has been made well aware of the Hollie Grieg case and as also failed to act on this information. Fraud i'm afraid! get somone in to head this orginization who really does care for children.

roofspace says...
3:52pm Mon 15 Oct 12

The only person in Jimmy Saviles' life was Jimmy Savile. As for his charity work I very much doubt he ever donated any of his own money. He opened the first disco in Southampton back in the 60's along with the resident DJ Johnny Dymond who in his spare time did broadcasts for the local hospital radio run by Toc H. He decided to record an interview with him for the patients but Savile refused to speak into the microphone unless he was given £200 (when the average wage was about £18 a week). Needless to say the patients never heard the interview.

southy says...
4:27pm Mon 15 Oct 12

roofspace wrote:
The only person in Jimmy Saviles' life was Jimmy Savile. As for his charity work I very much doubt he ever donated any of his own money. He opened the first disco in Southampton back in the 60's along with the resident DJ Johnny Dymond who in his spare time did broadcasts for the local hospital radio run by Toc H. He decided to record an interview with him for the patients but Savile refused to speak into the microphone unless he was given £200 (when the average wage was about £18 a week). Needless to say the patients never heard the interview.
That was Top Rank Dance Hall they opened up, the Mecca Ball room on the pier was doing a Sunday night Disco before the Top Rank was even built, also the Surrey arms use to do a weekend night club up stairs when the Rose Family ran that Pub.

bazzeroz says...
7:23pm Mon 15 Oct 12

Lockssmart wrote:
Can't stand the woman.
I was talking to her in Sainsburys today and she said she couldn't stand you either!

Lockssmart says...
8:10pm Mon 15 Oct 12

You're so funny spaz zero

rickey says...
9:37pm Mon 15 Oct 12

Always remember rumours are just that, rumors, they are not facts. You need more than rumours to act against a person, you need evidence. Mind you it seems that in this case the Police and the media tend to believe that rumours and allegations make a person automatically guilty. Roof space - he may or may not have given any of his money but he did give his time to charity which raised £40 million.
This has become an hysterical witch hunt against a person who is dead! There will be no trial and no defence only a media inspired demolition of Saville's reputation with people lining up to get their share of the pot. Other people like Rantzen are attempting to distance themselves from the affair. She says that Seville was too powerful at the time but she headed a program like watchdog which exposed wrong doing and her husband was Desmond Wilcox who was a BBC executive as well as documentary filmmaker. It does seem that there are people jumping on the bandwagon to either accuse him of abuse or to make excuses why they did nothing at the time, particularly when they think they may be dragged into the sordid affair by association. For people who were not around in the 60's and 70's don't forget this was the era of 'sex and drugs and rock n roll' so don't be too surprised about the sex aspect. Famous pop stars with lots of young girls eager to do what ever their idol wanted. Look at the Beatles films and performances, mostly very young girls screaming and wanting to be with their idols, are you naive to believe that nothing happened. So we might find that Seville is indeed a dirty old man but don't think that he was the only one and if the witch hunt continues then sooner or later all our idols will fall.

Here, There says...
1:08am Tue 16 Oct 12

Absolutely rickey, when I think of sex drugs and rock and roll i automatically think of Jimmy Savile ?????? So forgive us young'uns for thinking he is a wrong'un due to the fact we were not born in an era where child abuse was acceptable !! Would never condone certain behaviours but differentiate Savile to 15/16/17/18 year olds who looked older throwing themselves at their Idols

roofspace says...
4:17pm Tue 16 Oct 12

southy wrote:
roofspace wrote:
The only person in Jimmy Saviles' life was Jimmy Savile. As for his charity work I very much doubt he ever donated any of his own money. He opened the first disco in Southampton back in the 60's along with the resident DJ Johnny Dymond who in his spare time did broadcasts for the local hospital radio run by Toc H. He decided to record an interview with him for the patients but Savile refused to speak into the microphone unless he was given £200 (when the average wage was about £18 a week). Needless to say the patients never heard the interview.
That was Top Rank Dance Hall they opened up, the Mecca Ball room on the pier was doing a Sunday night Disco before the Top Rank was even built, also the Surrey arms use to do a weekend night club up stairs when the Rose Family ran that Pub.
The disco in question was "The Adam & Eve". I was friendly with Johnny Diamond and sometimes helped him out when he used to DJ at the Pier and the Guildhall. He was the one who told me about Savile and how he bragged about always carrying a wad of money (about £1000) in rolls in his pocket and proved it by showing it to him. Then asked the charity to give him £200.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree