New £40m development plan for old OS site approved (From Daily Echo)

There needs to be a new council ward in this area.

Echo the location on the map is in the wrong place, it should located at Maybush corner, the Wimpson Lane, Romsey RD, Rownhams RD juction.

southy wrote:
Echo the location on the map is in the wrong place, it should located at Maybush corner, the Wimpson Lane, Romsey RD, Rownhams RD juction.

That's what happens when you use Google maps instead of Ordnance Survey ones!

MaxxieO wrote:

southy wrote:
Echo the location on the map is in the wrong place, it should located at Maybush corner, the Wimpson Lane, Romsey RD, Rownhams RD juction.

That's what happens when you use Google maps instead of Ordnance Survey ones!

lol very true max

southy wrote:
There needs to be a new council ward in this area.

Why?

The electorate of the 16 Southampton wards range from 9723 to 13919.

All the wards in the surrounding area to the OS site contain between 10,000 and 11,500 - all quite average.

There is NO demographic need for ANY new wards in this area.

This new development will not distort ward population size to any extent that would require what you suggest.

Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

Heard a rumour that the woods that are where the A is are going for housing now the schools gone?
The Maybush shuts but use to be popular but is now to become ( if not already) Tesco's yet they're building a newc Pub?
why not keep the existing one & keep Tesco's away?

Your rumour is close to the mark loose

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

freefinker wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

I think Southy could have a point, if the redbridge ward was split so that it was redbridge as one ward and the phone box on Kendal Avenue as the other, then Southy could stand and actually get elected! but only if he represents the phone box ward!!!!!

freefinker wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

your wrong now I told you to come round here and I show you the paper work on it all.
Not every house hold as some one registered to vote, there way to many homes that are not registed, and I have told you there over 13,000 homes in the Redbridge Ward, Example there 79 homes in my road and about 24 homes do not have a single person registered to vote, and if what Lee as told me is right those new homes near the train station only about 10 people are registed to vote and its like this all over the Redbridge ward, where people do not bother now to register, because they will not vote for any Right Wing Party and they no longer trust Labour to do the right thing for the majority, and once people stop voting its hard to get them back to the polls.
And the reason I deliver to none register is to try and get them back and register to vote again and to the polls again.
Get involve then you might start to relise the whole of it and not a small part of it all.
The returning office only knows the number that did vote, the total number of people that have registered, and the result.
He do not know what is the total of number of people that are of age to be able to vote nore do he know the total number of homes there is in each area, and it is here where you do not know, unless you stand for election. then you get to see the big gaps in the homes that do not have any body registered to vote.
The decline started to happen in the mid 80's, when Kinnock took over the Labour Party

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

your wrong now I told you to come round here and I show you the paper work on it all.
Not every house hold as some one registered to vote, there way to many homes that are not registed, and I have told you there over 13,000 homes in the Redbridge Ward, Example there 79 homes in my road and about 24 homes do not have a single person registered to vote, and if what Lee as told me is right those new homes near the train station only about 10 people are registed to vote and its like this all over the Redbridge ward, where people do not bother now to register, because they will not vote for any Right Wing Party and they no longer trust Labour to do the right thing for the majority, and once people stop voting its hard to get them back to the polls.
And the reason I deliver to none register is to try and get them back and register to vote again and to the polls again.
Get involve then you might start to relise the whole of it and not a small part of it all.
The returning office only knows the number that did vote, the total number of people that have registered, and the result.
He do not know what is the total of number of people that are of age to be able to vote nore do he know the total number of homes there is in each area, and it is here where you do not know, unless you stand for election. then you get to see the big gaps in the homes that do not have any body registered to vote.
The decline started to happen in the mid 80's, when Kinnock took over the Labour Party

If you don't register to vote then you're not on the electoral role & isn't that breaking the law?

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

your wrong now I told you to come round here and I show you the paper work on it all.
Not every house hold as some one registered to vote, there way to many homes that are not registed, and I have told you there over 13,000 homes in the Redbridge Ward, Example there 79 homes in my road and about 24 homes do not have a single person registered to vote, and if what Lee as told me is right those new homes near the train station only about 10 people are registed to vote and its like this all over the Redbridge ward, where people do not bother now to register, because they will not vote for any Right Wing Party and they no longer trust Labour to do the right thing for the majority, and once people stop voting its hard to get them back to the polls.
And the reason I deliver to none register is to try and get them back and register to vote again and to the polls again.
Get involve then you might start to relise the whole of it and not a small part of it all.
The returning office only knows the number that did vote, the total number of people that have registered, and the result.
He do not know what is the total of number of people that are of age to be able to vote nore do he know the total number of homes there is in each area, and it is here where you do not know, unless you stand for election. then you get to see the big gaps in the homes that do not have any body registered to vote.
The decline started to happen in the mid 80's, when Kinnock took over the Labour Party

If you don't register to vote then you're not on the electoral role & isn't that breaking the law?

No loose, you break the law if you don't fill in the 10 year census, but when it comes to the register to vote that is a personal choice if you register or not.

southy wrote:

loosehead wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

your wrong now I told you to come round here and I show you the paper work on it all.
Not every house hold as some one registered to vote, there way to many homes that are not registed, and I have told you there over 13,000 homes in the Redbridge Ward, Example there 79 homes in my road and about 24 homes do not have a single person registered to vote, and if what Lee as told me is right those new homes near the train station only about 10 people are registed to vote and its like this all over the Redbridge ward, where people do not bother now to register, because they will not vote for any Right Wing Party and they no longer trust Labour to do the right thing for the majority, and once people stop voting its hard to get them back to the polls.
And the reason I deliver to none register is to try and get them back and register to vote again and to the polls again.
Get involve then you might start to relise the whole of it and not a small part of it all.
The returning office only knows the number that did vote, the total number of people that have registered, and the result.
He do not know what is the total of number of people that are of age to be able to vote nore do he know the total number of homes there is in each area, and it is here where you do not know, unless you stand for election. then you get to see the big gaps in the homes that do not have any body registered to vote.
The decline started to happen in the mid 80's, when Kinnock took over the Labour Party

If you don't register to vote then you're not on the electoral role & isn't that breaking the law?

No loose, you break the law if you don't fill in the 10 year census, but when it comes to the register to vote that is a personal choice if you register or not.

How can anyone moan about what party gets into power if they don't vote?
Let's go the Aussie way & make it illegal not to vote

loose in some ways I think it should be illegal to not to vote, but if you do that then there need to be a box for abstaining

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton.
this out of your league Free

.. nope. Wrong again - on everthing..

Here's the 2012 electrol numbers: -
Bargate – 13,919.
Bassett – 11,007.
Bevois – 11,556.
Bitterne – 10,089.
Bitterne Park – 10,657.
Coxford – 10,407.
Freemantle - 11,014.
Harefield – 10,529.
Millbrook – 11,067.
Peartree – 10,537.
Portswood – 10,609.
Redbridge – 10,406.
Shirley – 10,458.
Sholing – 10,794.
Swaythling – 9,723.
Woolston – 9,971.

These are the official figures as posted by the Returning Officer and detailed on the SCC website.

And you say “this out of your league Free”. You haven’t got a clue southy.

Wrong yet again. You are a fool to yourself.

I know how many leafetts I delived in the Redbridge ward, and what your quoting is how many people that are registered to vote that did vote, not the max number that are able to vote if all are registered, with in the old Redbridge Village Boundry there are over 20,000 homes, parts have been move into the Millbrook and Shirley ward, and part of the Coxford ward as been moved into the Redbridge ward, as it stands now there are over 13,000 homes with in the Redbridge ward, I know I had delived that many leaflets (one to each home) and still not compleated every single home, because i had ran out of time and leafetts.
If they are the numbers that the returning office quoted then that is the number off people that voted, and not the number of homes or the number of people registered or the number of people that are of age to vote.
Turn out for the Redbridge Ward was low, it was around the 1/3rd turn out.

the one who don't have a clue is your self, and if you like to come round here I can prove it, I have the paper work that will prove it and it do not inclued every single home with in the Redbridge ward.
You will learn should you ever put your self up to be elected.

.. no, no, no, no, no, southy.

You have it completely wrong.

The figures I quote are the numbers on the electoral roll for each ward at the time of the 2012 local elections. Full stop.

It has NOTHING to do with "old Redbridge Village Boundry", NOTHING to do with the number of homes, NOTHING to do with the numbers who turned out to vote. It is simply the number of people registered to vote in each ward – i.e. THE ELECTORATE; the very people you need to woo if you want to be elected.

If you can’t understand simple concepts like this, I suggest you give up. Yet again you show your ignorance of matters electoral and your inability to provide accurate data when posting on this site.

.. what’s more southy, you have a consistent track record of getting info wrong concerning local government and local elections.

Need I remind you of your foolishness over the rules for how local by-elections are called; as well as your stupidity in insisting that Council Tax goes to central government with only a proportion being returned at the end of the year?

You were totally wrong on both issues – as you are on this.

your wrong now I told you to come round here and I show you the paper work on it all.
Not every house hold as some one registered to vote, there way to many homes that are not registed, and I have told you there over 13,000 homes in the Redbridge Ward, Example there 79 homes in my road and about 24 homes do not have a single person registered to vote, and if what Lee as told me is right those new homes near the train station only about 10 people are registed to vote and its like this all over the Redbridge ward, where people do not bother now to register, because they will not vote for any Right Wing Party and they no longer trust Labour to do the right thing for the majority, and once people stop voting its hard to get them back to the polls.
And the reason I deliver to none register is to try and get them back and register to vote again and to the polls again.
Get involve then you might start to relise the whole of it and not a small part of it all.
The returning office only knows the number that did vote, the total number of people that have registered, and the result.
He do not know what is the total of number of people that are of age to be able to vote nore do he know the total number of homes there is in each area, and it is here where you do not know, unless you stand for election. then you get to see the big gaps in the homes that do not have any body registered to vote.
The decline started to happen in the mid 80's, when Kinnock took over the Labour Party

.. waffle, waffle and more waffle.

It may have escaped your notice but only those registered to vote are allowed to vote.

You said at the beginning of this exchange "Wrong the ward that the old O/S as over 13,000 and is the largest numbers of voters and homes in southampton"

You were wrong, wrong, wrong. The ward with the largest number of voters is Bargate. The old OS was not in Bargate.

No amount of waffle and diversionary tactics will ever alter the facts. Facts, dear southy, is an area where you score very badly.

you know your wrong free by you going .. waffle, waffle and more waffle.
Funny how loose can see it but you can't, but mind you loose is a member of a political party so he should get to know.
And I quoted facts for you there are well over 13,000 homes in the Redbridge ward, And I think there should be lest another ward added, because a single person can not working a ward of this size can not compleat the whole ward on there own, and you should be able to cover every single home in the 4 weeks that is allowed to do electioneering

The Bargate as the largest numbers of people registered to vote, it do not have the largest number in population to be able to vote, the bargate ward is mainly made up in offices and shops and not homes. its the working class estates on the out skirts of the city is where the largest numbers of people are. but its that big proble it is also where you find the most not registered to vote.

southy wrote:
The Bargate as the largest numbers of people registered to vote, it do not have the largest number in population to be able to vote, the bargate ward is mainly made up in offices and shops and not homes. its the working class estates on the out skirts of the city is where the largest numbers of people are. but its that big proble it is also where you find the most not registered to vote.

I could cover the Bargate ward in 3 to 4 days on my own delivering a leaflet to every signal home.

census in 2001 put Redbridge ward with 14,432 homes. and since then more homes have been built in this ward

southy wrote:
census in 2001 put Redbridge ward with 14,432 homes. and since then more homes have been built in this ward

No, no, no, no. Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

There were 14,432 PEOPLE in Redbridge ward according to the 2001 census - 7,118 males and 7,314 females.

They lived in 6,197 households (or homes as you call them).

Yet again you fail, and miserably at that.

Here's the link: -
http://www.neighbour
hood.statistics.gov.
uk/dissemination/Lea
dKeyFigures.do?a=3&b
=5939876&c=Redbridge
&d=14&e=16&g=412303&
i=1001x1003x1004&o=1
&m=0&r=1&s=119522312
3359&enc=1

As this includes the under 18’s it is easy to see why there are only 10,406 on the electoral roll.

southy wrote:
The Bargate as the largest numbers of people registered to vote, it do not have the largest number in population to be able to vote, the bargate ward is mainly made up in offices and shops and not homes. its the working class estates on the out skirts of the city is where the largest numbers of people are. but its that big proble it is also where you find the most not registered to vote.

.. southy, you have no basis what-so-ever to draw these conclusions. Generally speaking the larger the electoral roll, the larger the population. I doubt very much if there is much divergence within a city of the percentage of people failing to register.

The fact that Bargate has lots of shops and offices is totally irrelevant. The reason its electorate and population has increased so much over the last decade is because of the large number of new households created by the likes of Barrett and Linden in redeveloping the redundant office and warehouse space in the Queens Park to lower High Street area into sizable and tall apartment blocks.

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
census in 2001 put Redbridge ward with 14,432 homes. and since then more homes have been built in this ward

No, no, no, no. Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

There were 14,432 PEOPLE in Redbridge ward according to the 2001 census - 7,118 males and 7,314 females.

They lived in 6,197 households (or homes as you call them).

Yet again you fail, and miserably at that.

Here's the link: -
http://www.neighbour

hood.statistics.gov.

uk/dissemination/Lea

dKeyFigures.do?a=3&a
mp;b
=5939876&c=Redbr
idge
&d=14&e=16&a
mp;g=412303&
i=1001x1003x1004&amp
;o=1
&m=0&r=1&amp
;s=119522312
3359&enc=1

As this includes the under 18’s it is easy to see why there are only 10,406 on the electoral roll.

Freefinker the most area where housing was most densely built was Lordshill Channel islands.
so add that to the amount of flats in the redbridge ward I would say it comes a very close second if not first as the largest( population) ward.
I don't usually agree with Southy but this has to be one of the largest per capita ward for the area.

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
The Bargate as the largest numbers of people registered to vote, it do not have the largest number in population to be able to vote, the bargate ward is mainly made up in offices and shops and not homes. its the working class estates on the out skirts of the city is where the largest numbers of people are. but its that big proble it is also where you find the most not registered to vote.

.. southy, you have no basis what-so-ever to draw these conclusions. Generally speaking the larger the electoral roll, the larger the population. I doubt very much if there is much divergence within a city of the percentage of people failing to register.

The fact that Bargate has lots of shops and offices is totally irrelevant. The reason its electorate and population has increased so much over the last decade is because of the large number of new households created by the likes of Barrett and Linden in redeveloping the redundant office and warehouse space in the Queens Park to lower High Street area into sizable and tall apartment blocks.

If lower town comes under Bargate I can see where your coming from

loosehead wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
The Bargate as the largest numbers of people registered to vote, it do not have the largest number in population to be able to vote, the bargate ward is mainly made up in offices and shops and not homes. its the working class estates on the out skirts of the city is where the largest numbers of people are. but its that big proble it is also where you find the most not registered to vote.

.. southy, you have no basis what-so-ever to draw these conclusions. Generally speaking the larger the electoral roll, the larger the population. I doubt very much if there is much divergence within a city of the percentage of people failing to register.

The fact that Bargate has lots of shops and offices is totally irrelevant. The reason its electorate and population has increased so much over the last decade is because of the large number of new households created by the likes of Barrett and Linden in redeveloping the redundant office and warehouse space in the Queens Park to lower High Street area into sizable and tall apartment blocks.

If lower town comes under Bargate I can see where your coming from

.. yes, it does.

loosehead wrote:

freefinker wrote:

southy wrote:
census in 2001 put Redbridge ward with 14,432 homes. and since then more homes have been built in this ward

No, no, no, no. Wrong, wrong and wrong again.

There were 14,432 PEOPLE in Redbridge ward according to the 2001 census - 7,118 males and 7,314 females.

They lived in 6,197 households (or homes as you call them).

Yet again you fail, and miserably at that.

Here's the link: -
http://www.neighbour


hood.statistics.gov.


uk/dissemination/Lea


dKeyFigures.do?a=3&a
mp;a
mp;b
=5939876&c=Redbr

idge
&d=14&e=16&a
mp;a
mp;g=412303&
i=1001x1003x1004&amp
;
;o=1
&m=0&r=1&amp
;
;s=119522312
3359&enc=1

As this includes the under 18’s it is easy to see why there are only 10,406 on the electoral roll.

Freefinker the most area where housing was most densely built was Lordshill Channel islands.
so add that to the amount of flats in the redbridge ward I would say it comes a very close second if not first as the largest( population) ward.
I don't usually agree with Southy but this has to be one of the largest per capita ward for the area.

OK, here are the population statistics from the 2001 census: -

Bargate – 11,833.
Bassett – 13,139.
Bevois – 13,621.
Bitterne – 14,384.
Bitterne Park – 13,276.
Coxford – 14,232.
Freemantle – 13,468.
Harefield – 13,711.
Millbrook – 14,502.
Peartree – 13,633.
Portswood – 14,384.
Redbridge – 14,432.
Shirley – 13,369.
Sholing – 13,590.
Swaythling – 13,394.
Woolston – 13,684.

As you will see, there is not much in it, is there?

OK, there have been some minor boundary changes since 2001 as well as considerable number of new households due to new builds. But these statistics in no way back up anything southy has been saying.

southy wrote:
census in 2001 put Redbridge ward with 14,432 homes. and since then more homes have been built in this ward

.. oh well, guess now I've shot this ‘statistic’ down in flames and provided the accurate data, together with an authoritative link, southy won't be seen on this thread again.

Southy the Mountbatten pub has fenced off it's part of the car park & is holding a two day Charity fund raiser for Cancer research.
Would you believe that people have gone to the Police trying to stop it?
This pub has gotten rid of it's bad boy image & is now trying to do something for a worth while charity & people are objecting?