Hampshire County Council hires new boss to tackle the credit crunch

New £83,000 council executive - hired one year after cull in senior bosses New £83,000 council executive - hired one year after cull in senior bosses

COUNTY council bosses have hired a new £83,000 executive – just a year after culling senior managers.

David Fletcher, 47, has been appointed to the post of assistant director for economic development with a brief to boost the local economy and tackle the credit crunch.

Just 12 months ago Alison Quant took early retirement from her £140,000 director of economic development post.

Her job was axed and the economic department merged with the environment and transport department as a cost-cutting measure.

Now the new taxpayer-funded position has been created by Tory council chiefs in a bid to “bring clear direction and impetus to develop Hampshire’s economy”.

Mr Fletcher will be paid up to £83,000 plus contributions to his final salary pension worth thousands more.

His appointment comes against a backdrop of the councils cutting the number of managers by 25 per cent.

The local authority had 359 managers earning between £50,000 and £125,000 in March 2012 compared to 451 the previous year.

By April 2014 the county council will have 1,700 fewer staff than in 2010, with net savings of £46m on its salary bill.

But the new post has been slammed by an anti-tax group as sending out the wrong message at a time of general belttightening.

Christine Melsom, founder of IsItFair, said: “His pay and pension will be worth nearly £100,000 a year. The last thing local taxpayers need is a big bill for a new council manager.“

"It is sending out the wrong message. We are all having to tighten our belts and the council should too.”

Bosses at the county council said Mr Fletcher would lead a drive to increase Hampshire’s economic prosperity, including inward investment, tourism, and enterprise.

His role will involve working with other local authorities, the Solent and Enterprise M3 Local Enterprise Partnerships.

Mr Fletcher, a father-of-two, has spent the past ten years working as head of an economic development body in Sheffield.

Other previous posts include a senior business development role in the property and construction sector with Wimpey.

Councillor Keith House, leader of the Liberal Democrat opposition group on the county council, said: “The proof for or against this new post will come against the number of jobs created and the amount of extra growth in the Hampshire economy.”

WHY WE NEED NEW £83,000 EXECUTIVE - COUNCIL CHIEF DEFENDS APPOINTMENT - CLICK HERE

 

Comments(10)

alan.of.eastleigh says...
9:27am Mon 22 Oct 12

I am obviously missing something here. Isn't the deletion of a £140k post, a merging of departments and replacing it with a post at £83k a good thing??

Linesman says...
9:41am Mon 22 Oct 12

Surely one of the Senior Managers that were 'culled' could have filled this post, probably giving him/her a salary increase, and saving on a redundancy package and a few years of pension payments.

Over the Edge says...
11:44am Mon 22 Oct 12

Maybe they should have offered him a performance related pay post for about £50k per annum plus a bonus if he's get in a certain about of business in Hampshire, then again maybe he wouldn't have that role.

Business will come to Hampshire if they want to, if there are financial incentives to come here then they will if there are other area's offering incentives they will go there.

southy says...
12:49pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Its time to look at all the top managers pay, some are earning way over the top, and whats with the councillors could they off not done this job, as part of the elected council job.

Torchie1 says...
2:27pm Mon 22 Oct 12

southy wrote:
Its time to look at all the top managers pay, some are earning way over the top, and whats with the councillors could they off not done this job, as part of the elected council job.
Would you care to comment on the Union fat cats who get paid a lot more than these top managers?

southy says...
3:00pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Torchie1 wrote:
southy wrote:
Its time to look at all the top managers pay, some are earning way over the top, and whats with the councillors could they off not done this job, as part of the elected council job.
Would you care to comment on the Union fat cats who get paid a lot more than these top managers?
The difference is Torchie (it might of escape your notice) that Union bosses do not I repeat DO NOT get paid by public money, Council Bosses do,
plus most Union bosses do not get paid as much, and the figures you see are total cost that includes expensese, where here you seeing the figures with out expenses.
And if you want to dive in a direction out side the public money, just not that many bosses and company board directors are earning well over 150,000 a year and also advoid paying the faullamount of taxes.

Torchie1 says...
3:24pm Mon 22 Oct 12

southy wrote:
Torchie1 wrote:
southy wrote:
Its time to look at all the top managers pay, some are earning way over the top, and whats with the councillors could they off not done this job, as part of the elected council job.
Would you care to comment on the Union fat cats who get paid a lot more than these top managers?
The difference is Torchie (it might of escape your notice) that Union bosses do not I repeat DO NOT get paid by public money, Council Bosses do,
plus most Union bosses do not get paid as much, and the figures you see are total cost that includes expensese, where here you seeing the figures with out expenses.
And if you want to dive in a direction out side the public money, just not that many bosses and company board directors are earning well over 150,000 a year and also advoid paying the faullamount of taxes.
You either get paid highly or you don't but it seems you can always find a case for supporting your union colleagues and another for attacking the 'bosses'. The remuneration packages of private company executives is nothing to do with you but it doesn't stop you regularly attacking them. I can't make up my mind whether you have a chip on both shoulders or just the one.

southy says...
3:56pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Torchie1 wrote:
southy wrote:
Torchie1 wrote:
southy wrote:
Its time to look at all the top managers pay, some are earning way over the top, and whats with the councillors could they off not done this job, as part of the elected council job.
Would you care to comment on the Union fat cats who get paid a lot more than these top managers?
The difference is Torchie (it might of escape your notice) that Union bosses do not I repeat DO NOT get paid by public money, Council Bosses do,
plus most Union bosses do not get paid as much, and the figures you see are total cost that includes expensese, where here you seeing the figures with out expenses.
And if you want to dive in a direction out side the public money, just not that many bosses and company board directors are earning well over 150,000 a year and also advoid paying the faullamount of taxes.
You either get paid highly or you don't but it seems you can always find a case for supporting your union colleagues and another for attacking the 'bosses'. The remuneration packages of private company executives is nothing to do with you but it doesn't stop you regularly attacking them. I can't make up my mind whether you have a chip on both shoulders or just the one.
Its the same with Union Leaders as nothing do with you and your attacks on them all the time, if you want to have a say in there matters then join one and vote with in the Union.
I do not care about how much the private sector bosses earn in wages, but what I do care about is when they avoid paying the full amount of taxes, that do have some thing to do with me and every one else, also those that take public service jobs have some thing to do with me and every one else.

Boatman says...
5:19pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Why on earth are there 359 'managers' being paid £50k-£125k ?

Huffter says...
6:08pm Mon 22 Oct 12

Isn't it time the Daily Echo told us how much it is paying its Editor?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree