When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
7:00am Sunday 29th March 2009 in
WHEN Gordon Brown brought his Cabinet to Southampton, a wave of optimism swept across the city. He spoke in glowing terms of a region well-placed to weather the recession, and heaped praise on a city he described as “the gateway to the world”.
But now, just 33 days after the trip, which the Daily Echo can today reveal cost Hampshire police alone almost £38,000, the gloss has gone, revealing a more tarnished reality.
In the space of less than five weeks, the city has been rocked by a series of economic setbacks: Hopes up to 400 new jobs would be created in Southampton through a new Government department being sited in the city were dashed when it was announced it would be based in Tyneside instead.
Funding has been withdrawn for Guildhall Square
Port firms, local politicians and business groups had pitched Southampton as The Marine Management Organisation’s “natural home”, but the north-east won out because of its “broad range and good balance of marine interests”.
The future of Southampton docks, on which 12,000 local workers depend, is under threat from Government proposals for a “swingeing” increase in ship taxes.
Fears have been raised that many of the port’s biggest customers could quit the city for cheaper alternatives abroad in the face of 67 per cent rises in their tax bills.
Ambitious building projects at five Hampshire colleges, costing a total of £160m, hang in the balance after funding was suddenly shelved.
Southampton docks faces a ‘swingeing’ increase in ship taxes
Schemes at Southampton City College, Itchen College, Taunton’s College, Totton College and Brockenhurst College are all on hold, pending a review, because The Learning and Skills Council said it had run out of cash to pay for them.
And now we can also reveal that the South East England Development Agency (Seeda) has pulled the £4.6m it had promised for the revamp of Guildhall Square, as a central part of plans to develop a cultural quarter.
Southampton taxpayers could now be forced to foot the bill for the scheme to create a plush granite plaza stretching from East Park to the steps of the Guildhall.
Funding has been shelved for college building projects
The City Council remains committed to the project, despite the developers behind the £50m two landmark 18-storey glass towers that were to house the new arts complex having pulled out last year.
Southampton’s Cabinet member for economic development, Royston Smith, said the authority would not be knocked off course by Seeda’s “disgraceful” decision.
The council is already paying the £500,000 costs of pulling down the derelict former Tyrell and Green building, converting the eyesore into a temporary park in a bid to attract a new firm to take on the scheme.
“If necessary, we will borrow the money to continue with Guildhall Square where Seeda has let us down,” said Councillor Smith.
“It will be going forward where possible, but with Southampton taxpayers’ money, where it should have been with promised money where the Government has let us down.
The Marine Management Organisation will not be coming to the city
“We promised we would deliver this and we will find a way to deliver it.”
Cllr Smith believes the pulled funding provides just another example of Southampton being let down by the “hollow words” delivered when Cabinet came to the city last month.
“I never thought it was anything more than an expensive publicity stunt,” he said.
“They said they were coming down to listen to people, but they didn’t talk to a single member of the public.
“Who did they listen to and what did they hear? They didn’t hear anyone saying please take all our investment away, but that’s exactly what they’ve done.
“We have a Secretary of State who says he is Southampton’s voice in the Cabinet. We’ve lost anything up to £70m in the last week, so I challenge anyone to say this is a voice in the Cabinet.
“In light of what has happened in Southampton since that visit, I would hope for any other city’s sake that they don’t announce plans to go there, because they’re clearly a jinx – they certainly haven’t done us any favours.”
Southampton Itchen MP John Denham, the Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills, last night accused the Tory councillor of talking the city down.
“As local MP, I share the disappointment about Seeda’s decision, but recognise they have to make tough decisions on priorities,” he said.
“But I think Cllr Smith needs to be honest with the people of Southampton. His party committed themselves to £5 billion of public spending cuts, starting from April.
“No Conservative politician can stand up and complain about any project being cut, because it’s perfectly clear that if they were in power there would be more cut.
“I think Royston Smith should stop his campaign of talking the city down, and putting everything that happens in the worst possible light.
“If I were in charge of economic development, I would want to be talking the city up.”
Comments(24)
Condor Man
says...
8:52am Sun 29 Mar 09
goard
says...
9:43am Sun 29 Mar 09
Duncan Disorderly
says...
10:42am Sun 29 Mar 09
southy
says...
1:21pm Sun 29 Mar 09
Finlay
says...
3:17pm Sun 29 Mar 09
goard
says...
4:30pm Sun 29 Mar 09
Maverell
says...
5:07pm Sun 29 Mar 09
thesaint
says...
5:35pm Sun 29 Mar 09
Condor Man wrote:the southampton mps are good local mps and would vote for them even if they were tory or liberal,i cannot stand the current labour party and remember when the torys mismanged the countrys finances .so it gets harder to find some to vote for.
anyone who votes for either Denham or Whitehead in the next election will be condemning the rest of us to another 5 years of financial mismanagement. If you seriously think that life has improved since 1997 you are deluded. All we've seen are taxes rising to pay for huge pay increases for people at the top of public services.
The Labour party have proved themselves to be the party of financial collapse as they were in the late 60s and 70s.
The last recession was solved by fiscal prudence, this stimulus will make us all poorer in the long run.
Condor Man
says...
6:32pm Sun 29 Mar 09
thesaint wrote:I couldn't care less about their ability. The fact is that they are backing a government that is leading this country into a abyss. Therefore they are guilty by association and should lose their seats. If you seriously think that by electing with Denham or Whitehead we'll see an improvement in the fortunes of city and country you are deluded.
Condor Man wrote: anyone who votes for either Denham or Whitehead in the next election will be condemning the rest of us to another 5 years of financial mismanagement. If you seriously think that life has improved since 1997 you are deluded. All we've seen are taxes rising to pay for huge pay increases for people at the top of public services. The Labour party have proved themselves to be the party of financial collapse as they were in the late 60s and 70s. The last recession was solved by fiscal prudence, this stimulus will make us all poorer in the long run.the southampton mps are good local mps and would vote for them even if they were tory or liberal,i cannot stand the current labour party and remember when the torys mismanged the countrys finances .so it gets harder to find some to vote for.
ex so'ton
says...
7:35pm Sun 29 Mar 09
Tobeblunt
says...
8:00pm Sun 29 Mar 09
Condor Man wrote:any of the political parties condem Southampton to a missmanagement of finances and do nothing to make to city worth living in. I'm only here because family live in southampton other wise i'd live else where. This city is a sh1t hole.
anyone who votes for either Denham or Whitehead in the next election will be condemning the rest of us to another 5 years of financial mismanagement. If you seriously think that life has improved since 1997 you are deluded. All we've seen are taxes rising to pay for huge pay increases for people at the top of public services. The Labour party have proved themselves to be the party of financial collapse as they were in the late 60s and 70s. The last recession was solved by fiscal prudence, this stimulus will make us all poorer in the long run.
Lone Ranger
says...
9:44pm Sun 29 Mar 09
Condor Man wrote:There you go again Condor Man with the usual Conservative cr@p.
thesaint wrote:I couldn't care less about their ability. The fact is that they are backing a government that is leading this country into a abyss. Therefore they are guilty by association and should lose their seats. If you seriously think that by electing with Denham or Whitehead we'll see an improvement in the fortunes of city and country you are deluded.Condor Man wrote: anyone who votes for either Denham or Whitehead in the next election will be condemning the rest of us to another 5 years of financial mismanagement. If you seriously think that life has improved since 1997 you are deluded. All we've seen are taxes rising to pay for huge pay increases for people at the top of public services. The Labour party have proved themselves to be the party of financial collapse as they were in the late 60s and 70s. The last recession was solved by fiscal prudence, this stimulus will make us all poorer in the long run.the southampton mps are good local mps and would vote for them even if they were tory or liberal,i cannot stand the current labour party and remember when the torys mismanged the countrys finances .so it gets harder to find some to vote for.
Paramjit Bahia
says...
10:57pm Sun 29 Mar 09
stuartjebbitt
says...
9:06am Mon 30 Mar 09
southy
says...
10:00am Mon 30 Mar 09
stuartjebbitt wrote:theres more than 2 partys to vote for,well most areas have more than 2, this coming elections in june (UE MP elections), a lot of areas will have a new to chose the cnwp are putting up people in many areas, vote for this one and send a message to all the other partys enough is enough, it will only take the next 2 years for the message to get clear to them, next year will be the general elections and the cnwp will probley be doing the same there to, just to get the message across to all partys, stop thinking off them selfs and start doing some thing for the masses.
Trouble is, with our archaic voting system there's only 2 choices of government, both of which have failed us time after time.
You can win a landslide victory in the UK with 40% of the vote.
That isn't democracy to my mind.
goard
says...
12:10pm Mon 30 Mar 09
Redback
says...
12:46pm Mon 30 Mar 09
ex so'ton
says...
7:56pm Mon 30 Mar 09
southy
says...
12:14pm Tue 31 Mar 09
ex so'ton
says...
9:49pm Wed 1 Apr 09
southy
says...
12:33pm Thu 2 Apr 09
ex so'ton
says...
2:34pm Thu 2 Apr 09
southy wrote:Thanks muchly. Will look out for them when the time comes.
Campaign for a New Workers Party
southy
says...
10:39am Fri 3 Apr 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Maverell says...
7:18am Sun 29 Mar 09