Fluoride row reaches High Court (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Judicial review due for fluoride plans for Southampton
11:34am Wednesday 19th January 2011 in Fluoride
By Jon Reeve, Education Reporter
Fluoride row reaches High Court
A LANDMARK court case that will decide the future of a controversial scheme to fluoridate Hampshire tap water was due to start today.
A High Court judge is set to examine whether or not health bosses were right to approve the plans in a bid to improve children’s dental health in Southampton, despite public opposition.
If the legal challenge, which has been brought by city resident Geraldine Milner, is successful, it could mean the scheme – the first in the country to be approved by a health authority rather than an elected council – is stopped.
But South Central Strategic Health Authority, which has set aside £400,000 to fight the judicial review, insists it did everything it was required to by law during a public consultation held before its board gave the plans the green light, nearly two years ago.
Despite Government plans to scrap all SHAs by next spring, it insists it would press ahead with work to see the chemical added to the water supplies of parts of Southampton, Eastleigh, Totton, Netley and Rownhams, if their defence is successful.
As revealed in yesterday’s Daily Echo, the leaders of Southampton City and Hampshire County councils, the bodies which will take over responsibility for fluoridation, both say they would call on the Government to stop the SHA introducing it in its “dying days”.
Ahead of the start of the two-day hearing, campaigners were due to stage a demonstration on the steps of London’s Royal Courts of Justice against the NHS body continuing to defend its case.
Stephen Peckham, chairman of Hampshire Against Fluoridation said: “Local anger about the SHA’s decision has grown since 2009. People feel that fluoridation is being imposed on them without their consent or approval.
“If Ms Milner had not taken this action the SHA would have just steam-rolled ahead with a total disregard for the evidence and local opinion.”
Comments(9)
Niel
says...
1:53pm Wed 19 Jan 11
I don't think so, too much fluorine is toxic, and not just to human's. The cost of cleaning up tap water contaminated with it for hospital use and industrial processing is huge, typically South Central Strategic Health Authority ignore those issues and costs.
As for setting aside 400K to fight a review, perhaps the gov't are right to try and get rid of wasteful layers of management, who's value add is invariably negative... Yes I have direct experience of this within the NHS.
Education and better diet are what stops the need for fillings, my son who lives in a flouride free area has NO fillings, brought up on poor diet I have quite a few, adding toxins to water in the HOPE of preventing tooth decay is like believing in the tooth fairy, but a lot more dangerous!
Linesman
says...
2:48pm Wed 19 Jan 11
Mercury is also a poison - more deadly than flouride - yet that was used in dental fillings for donkey's years. Why didn't it wipe out masses of the population?
Because it was such a small percentage of the mix, that it was not harmful, but was at a level that made the mix efficient - just like the was flouride would be added to water.
Strange as it may seem, there are some areas where flouride appears naturally in the water, and at a higher level than is proposed for this area.
geoff51
says...
4:02pm Wed 19 Jan 11
Chas O'Bursledon wrote:Dont expect the state to provide all the answers to your problems.
The selfishness of Geraldine Milner beggars belief. My daughters were born in Greater London. They have a couple of fillings each. Both their mother and I have a mouthful of mercury and gold as we were born before floridation of water. She is wanting to condemn children to a life of fillings for no good reason. Floridation is perfectly safe. There is no science to say otherwise. The consultation was properly conducted and valid. The decision to floridate is sound. One can only hope that Ms Milner loses. Sadly, she will not incur costs. We will on our water rates.
Buy your children good toothbrushes, floride toothpaste and teach them how to clean their teeth properly
Simple!
mummsie
says...
5:30pm Wed 19 Jan 11
geoff51 wrote:Well said Geoff51 ! Couldn't have said it better myself (even with a mouth full of Mercury and Gold !
Chas O'Bursledon wrote:Dont expect the state to provide all the answers to your problems.
The selfishness of Geraldine Milner beggars belief. My daughters were born in Greater London. They have a couple of fillings each. Both their mother and I have a mouthful of mercury and gold as we were born before floridation of water. She is wanting to condemn children to a life of fillings for no good reason. Floridation is perfectly safe. There is no science to say otherwise. The consultation was properly conducted and valid. The decision to floridate is sound. One can only hope that Ms Milner loses. Sadly, she will not incur costs. We will on our water rates.
Buy your children good toothbrushes, floride toothpaste and teach them how to clean their teeth properly
Simple!
lonsoz
says...
7:41pm Thu 20 Jan 11
mummsie wrote:why dont you ignorant people research things before you write your utter garbage. There are certainly health consequences to this.
geoff51 wrote:Well said Geoff51 ! Couldn't have said it better myself (even with a mouth full of Mercury and Gold !Chas O'Bursledon wrote: The selfishness of Geraldine Milner beggars belief. My daughters were born in Greater London. They have a couple of fillings each. Both their mother and I have a mouthful of mercury and gold as we were born before floridation of water. She is wanting to condemn children to a life of fillings for no good reason. Floridation is perfectly safe. There is no science to say otherwise. The consultation was properly conducted and valid. The decision to floridate is sound. One can only hope that Ms Milner loses. Sadly, she will not incur costs. We will on our water rates.Dont expect the state to provide all the answers to your problems. Buy your children good toothbrushes, floride toothpaste and teach them how to clean their teeth properly Simple!
1) Fluoride is known to cause dental fluorosis, a defect of the tooth enamel caused by fluoride’s interference with developing teeth. Its visible signs are mottled or yellowed teeth. Nearly 30% of children drinking fluoridated water suffer from dental fluorosis on two or more teeth (Hileman, 1988).
2) Fluoride is associated with Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia. Fluoride enters the brain and enables aluminum to cross the blood-brain barrier, resulting in increased risk for these diseases. Fluoride has also been associated with low IQ and mental retardation in children (Hileman, 1988).
3) Fluoride can cause a crippling bone disease called skeletal fluorosis. In more mild forms, symptoms of this disease include chronic joint pain, similar to the symptoms of arthritis. Arthritis has now reached near epidemic levels in the United States, and the connection to fluoridated water should be considered.
4) Fluoride depresses the activity of the human thyroid gland and has been commonly used as an effective treatment for patients with overactive thyroids. Fluoride may depress the activity of the healthy thyroid, as well, resulting in an underactive thyroid, a common cause of obesity. More than 20 million people in the United States receive treatment for thyroid problems.
5) Fluoride disrupts the activity of normally functioning hormones. Fluoride can reduce levels of melatonin, the sleep hormone, in the body, causing chronic insomnia (Hileman, 1988).
Most European countries have now rejected the process of water fluoridation. Their children’s teeth have not suffered from this rejection. The cost/benefit ratio of fluoridated water no longer warrants the presence of fluoride in drinking water.
if your children need fillings perhaps you should a) brush their teeth properly b)consult your dentist c) not spoil them with sweets :)
Calli
says...
12:53am Fri 21 Jan 11
Pete H Smith
says...
4:22pm Sat 22 Jan 11
Mary Williams
says...
4:30pm Sat 22 Jan 11
yroid problems, obesity and depression -not enough research has been done. Fluoride is an enzyme inhibitor and affects many body functions. There are too many top scientists against fluoridation-so how can we possibly advocate adding it to our water unless we are 100% sure of its safety. The bottom line is the morality of medicating water without knowing each persons dose and doing it against a persons will. May I congratulate Gerri Milner on her brave stance against the deplorable actions of the SHA and the disgusting waste of tax payers money.
Chas O'Bursledon says...
1:21pm Wed 19 Jan 11
The consultation was properly conducted and valid. The decision to floridate is sound. One can only hope that Ms Milner loses. Sadly, she will not incur costs. We will on our water rates.