Report this comment
  • "well im FOR fluoride in my tap water, i grew up in a area where we had it in our water and for the amount they actually add to the water it doesnt affect ur health, im perfectly healthy after having it in my water for the 20 yrs of my life in fact i have perfectly healthy teeth as well which i put down to the fluoride in the water, if people are causing such problems about having it in their water then why not kick off about having it in tooth paste and i think these people should be aware that there has been traces found in certain foods and drinks. so for those causing a stir about it should wind their necks in a little i think"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Southampton's fluoridation plans 'need backing of residents'

Fluoridation plans 'need backing of residents' Fluoridation plans 'need backing of residents'

GOVERNMENT ministers gave repeated assurances to parliament that fluoridation schemes would only go ahead if they were backed by affected residents, a court heard.

On the opening morning of a judicial review into South Central Strategic Health Authority's decision to add a chemical to the water supplies of nearly 200,000 Hampshire people barristers for Southampton woman Geraldine Milner have outlined their case.

Video news headlines from the Southern Daily Echo

Mrs Milner believes health chiefs should not have approved the plans because of opposition during a public consultation.

London's Royal Courts of Justice heard today that while debating changes to the Water Act in 2003 and 2005 ministers said that residents views were key to the decision making process.

Speaking in October 2003 minister Melanie Johnson told the House of Commons: "there is a difficulty in weighing up the responses, but whatever the case, local opinion must be in favour of the proposal. Local opinion must support the measure overall. Whatever mechanism used a clear majority of people should be in favour."

During the public consultation before the SHA board approved fluoridation in February 2009 72% of respondents from the affected area, which affects parts of Southampton, Eastleigh, Totton, Netley and Rownhams, said they were against the scheme.

In a separate telephone survey 38% of people questioned opposed adding fluoride while 32% gave it their backing.

The judicial review is examining what the governments intention was when it passed legislation determining how health authorities could approve fluoridation schemes.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree