- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@dailyecho
Daily Echo on Twitter
@the_saints
Saints News on Twitter
SceneSouth
Leisure news on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Facebook
Daily Echo on Facebook
Vincent Tabak guilty of Joanna Yeates' murder (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Vincent Tabak sentenced to life for murder of Jo Yeates
3:14pm Friday 28th October 2011 in News
JURORS have found Vincent Tabak guilty of murdering Hampshire born landscape architect Jo Yeates.
The jury of six men and six women found the Dutchman and former neighbour of Miss Yeates guilty of her murder.
Tabak was sentenced to life imprisonment, and must serve a minimum of 20 years.
The Judge had ruled earlier today that he would accept a majority verdict in the case.
They took 13 hours and 56 minutes to come to a decision.
In-depth
To read the full archive of stories relating to the murder of Joanna Yeates, including all the reaction from the sentencing, see the In-Depth Joanna Yeates section.
Tabak, 33, had admitted killing Miss Yeates before dumping her body which was found on Christmas Day last year, but had denied murdering her.
Giving evidence in his own defence Tabak claimed it was "pure chance" that he strangled her and that he misread her signals by trying to kiss her after she invited him in for a drink.
Tabak says that he put his hand to his 25-year-old victim's throat after she protested at his advances.
But the jury did not believe him and convicted him of murdering the 25-year-old who was a former pupil of Sherborne House School in Chandler's Ford, Embley Park School near Romsey and Peter Symonds College in Winchester.
Police believe Tabak throttled the 25-year-old after watching violent sex videos of women being strangled during sex, it can be revealed.
Tabak also paid for sex with a prostitute in the United States two weeks before killing Miss Yeates, detectives found.
Mr Justice Field began sentencing by telling the jury: ''I think there was a sexual element to this killing.''
Miss Yeates died ''in pain and fear'' and her disappearance left her family suffering ''seven days of agonising uncertainty'', the judge added.
Mr Justice Field told Tabak: ''You have been convicted of the murder of Joanna Yeates on sound and substantial evidence.
''When you entered her flat on the evening of December 17 last year you did not even know her name and had had virtually nothing to do with her.
''You proceeded to strangle her, intending, in my judgment, to kill her.
''A dreadful, evil act committed against a vulnerable unsuspecting young woman in her own home.
''That wicked act ended the life of a young woman who was entitled to expect a life of happiness and fulfilment.
''In my judgment, you are very dangerous. You are also thoroughly deceitful, dishonest and manipulative.
''You have caused devastating heartache and distress to Joanna's family and her partner, Greg Reardon.''
As Mr Justice Field passed his sentence, the jury watched him intently.
Mr Reardon shot a look over his shoulder at Tabak as other members of Miss Yeates's family supported each other, holding hands and fighting back the tears.
Tabak was led away from the dock by six officers under Mr Reardon's watchful eye.
In the corridor outside court, Miss Yeates's family members cried as they shook hands with the senior investigating officer on the case, Detective Chief Inspector Phil Jones.
The judge went on: ''Not only by taking Joanna's life but also by hiding her body, with the result they had to go through seven days of agony wondering what had happened to her.
''The sentence for murder is the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment and that is the sentence I must pass on you.''
The judge said there were no migating features in this case - only aggravating factors - and he proceeded to outline them.
''There is a sexual element to the killing of Joanna Yeates,'' the judge said.
''On your own evidence, after an acquaintenceship of only a few minutes, you moved to kiss Joanna and I am quite satisfied that you did not intend to stop there and intended to go much further.
''It was only because of her loud and gestured screams that your sexual purpose was frustrated.''
Comments(19)
Smartiepants
says...
3:39pm Fri 28 Oct 11
TimTam
says...
4:22pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Northamboy
says...
4:28pm Fri 28 Oct 11
StEmmosfire
says...
4:30pm Fri 28 Oct 11
espanuel
says...
4:50pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Lived in Hampshire while she was at school.
Her parents live in Hampshire.
And many friends in Hampshire.
Whats your PROBLEM?
HAMPSHIRE.
mastershot100
says...
5:03pm Fri 28 Oct 11
"And you must do 5 years before you can be released".
StEmmosfire
says...
5:04pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Timsey
says...
5:33pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Well done to the family for actually saying ‘wished their daughter's killer could have been given capital punishment’ wish more people victims families would speak up
Why should he still have a life when he comes out of prison and probably without doing his full sentence
Jakimb
says...
5:40pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Send him back to Holland and insist that he is imprisoned there for the stipulated time and the Dutch government can pay for his incarceration!
Dan Kerins
says...
5:53pm Fri 28 Oct 11
StEmmosfire wrote:Joanna Yeates grew up in the Romsey area, went to school there and her parents still live there.
It's a great verdict but ECHO now that I can finally comment on the story why do you insist on publishing national stories that have little to do with Southampton and surrounding areas (yes born in Hampshire, stop latching onto easy stories!). I can read about this on the BBC, keep it local!!!
A lot of people in the area will know Joanna Yeates and her family. For these reasons, the trial (and everything prior to it) is very much a story that must be covered by us, such is the level of interest among the Daily Echo's readership. As a newspaper of record, that is our responsibility.
No one is forced to read every story on the website or in the paper, so if something is not of interest to you personally, simply refrain from reading and commenting on it.
StEmmosfire
says...
6:18pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Dan Kerins wrote:I am commenting that i think it is very cheap and lazy for the echo to latch onto this story. I have been following the story through the BBC since day one.
StEmmosfire wrote:Joanna Yeates grew up in the Romsey area, went to school there and her parents still live there.
It's a great verdict but ECHO now that I can finally comment on the story why do you insist on publishing national stories that have little to do with Southampton and surrounding areas (yes born in Hampshire, stop latching onto easy stories!). I can read about this on the BBC, keep it local!!!
A lot of people in the area will know Joanna Yeates and her family. For these reasons, the trial (and everything prior to it) is very much a story that must be covered by us, such is the level of interest among the Daily Echo's readership. As a newspaper of record, that is our responsibility.
No one is forced to read every story on the website or in the paper, so if something is not of interest to you personally, simply refrain from reading and commenting on it.
StEmmosfire
says...
6:50pm Fri 28 Oct 11
eurogordi
says...
7:07pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Unfortunately, this case was high profile from the start with lots of irresponsible media coverage that quite likely swayed the jury before they even reached the courts.
This is one of the reasons I believe that the jury system should be scrapped, because it can never be fully just when we live in an age of trial by the press.
solomum
says...
7:26pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Jakimb wrote:I fully agree that if he is a Dutch national, then he should be imprisoned there. Our prisons are so full already.
OK - he has been found guilty, so why do we have to pay for his imprisonment?
Send him back to Holland and insist that he is imprisoned there for the stipulated time and the Dutch government can pay for his incarceration!
OSPREYSAINT
says...
8:57pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Georgem
says...
10:15pm Fri 28 Oct 11
Jakimb wrote:So you'd be quite happy for any Brit incarcerated abroad to be sent home where we can pay for their incarceration for a crime that was nothing to do with this country? You'd be quite happy, by this logic, that if a native from, say, the DRC, were found guilty of murder here, they were deported back to the Congo, where they'd serve....oh, probably nothing at all, since what passes for a government there isn't going to give two hoots what crimes he's committed abroad?
OK - he has been found guilty, so why do we have to pay for his imprisonment?
Send him back to Holland and insist that he is imprisoned there for the stipulated time and the Dutch government can pay for his incarceration!
ural_our_souls
says...
6:59am Sat 29 Oct 11
Condor Man
says...
8:20am Sat 29 Oct 11
eurogordi wrote:The judge deliberately didn't tell the jury about Tabak's interests in on line violence until after the judgment was made. Had they known about it he'd have been found guilty days ago.
I will no doubt be criticised for my comments, but I am not convinced Tabak is guilty of murder and would have favoured the lesser offence of manslaughter.
Unfortunately, this case was high profile from the start with lots of irresponsible media coverage that quite likely swayed the jury before they even reached the courts.
This is one of the reasons I believe that the jury system should be scrapped, because it can never be fully just when we live in an age of trial by the press.
I hope eventually he'll be deported to the Netherlands and never allowed to return to the UK.
Maybush Lad says...
3:19pm Fri 28 Oct 11
How the hell does someone strangle another by "pure chance"?