Hampshire Chief Constable Andy Marsh cleared of misconduct after investigation into Stanbridge Earls School

Hampshire Police Chief Constable Andy Marsh

Hampshire Police Chief Constable Andy Marsh

First published in Crime
Last updated

HAMPSHIRE'S top police officer has been formally cleared of any wrongdoing after the conclusion of an inquiry into a school hit by sex abuse claims.

As reported in the Daily Echo, Andy Marsh, the chief constable of Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, was last month cleared of wrong-doing after an investigation by another force amid complaints about police inquiries surrounding Stanbridge Earls in Romsey.

Now the senior investigating officer on the case, Operation Oregon, has written to Hampshire's Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) Simon Hayes, concluding there are no grounds to justify the serving of misconduct notices upon Mr Marsh.

Mr Hayes said: “All complaints against the Chief Constable have not been upheld.

“In his letter, Chief Constable Kavanagh (of Essex police) confirmed that Hampshire Constabulary provided full co-operation to the Operation Oregon team and that Chief Constable Marsh gave the investigation his full support, and provided a full, detailed and helpful account, which he was under no obligation to do.

“Having previously stated my absolute confidence in Chief Constable Marsh, I welcome this news and look forward to receiving the final report.”

Daily Echo: Hampshire PCC Simon Hayes

Hampshire Police and Crime Comissioner Simon Hayes

Mr Marsh said he welcomed the outcome of the investigation, and would like to thank everybody for their support over the recent months.

He said: “Effective policing requires high public confidence across our communities. This trust helps police to protect vulnerable people and to create a hostile environment for the most serious criminals.

“Confidence in policing in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight is not just at an all time high, the independent crime survey consistently shows it to be considerably higher than in other parts of the country.

“That is because trust is built by the actions of thousands of dedicated police officers and staff who do not make the headlines, but serve the public every hour of every day.

“I am very proud to lead such an inspiring group of people and to have the privilege of receiving hundreds of emails and letters of thanks from the public, underlining the outstanding work that is done.”

Daily Echo: Stanbridge Earls school

Stanbridge Earls school

The inquiry, which was carried out by Essex Police on behalf of Mr Hayes, was launched last August amid breach of confidentiality and contempt of court claims.

It is understood to be the first time that a UK PCC has ordered a probe of their own chief constable.

As the Daily Echo revealed exclusively, Mr Marsh was investigated over nine complaints.

These included:

  • A failure to undertake a thorough investigation into the sexual abuse of vulnerable pupils.
  • As a result, a failure to protect a vulnerable child from harm.
  • Giving “instructions” to officers that were designed to “mislead” parents of alleged victims.
  • Leaking details of alleged victims.

Some of these allegations had related to Operation Flamborough - an inquiry set up by Hampshire police after claims that Stanbridge Earls failed to properly protect a vulnerable child who claimed to have been raped by fellow pupils.

Mr Marsh was also investigated over claims that he told his boss, Mr Hayes, that the operation was “established to protect Hampshire Constabulary's reputation”.

He was also accused of leaking details of a criminal investigation and details of alleged rape victims to Caroline Nokes, MP for Romsey and Southampton North, as well as to Hampshire County Council.

Mr Marsh's exoneration comes as prosecutors ruled that there was “insufficient evidence” to bring charges against claims of sexual abuse of pupils through Operation Flamborough, as reported.

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:30pm Tue 10 Jun 14

Tallship says...

Unbelievable, how can an investigation into what Hampshire's Chief Constable did or didn't do be independent if the person investigating is the Chief Constable of Essex.
Unbelievable, how can an investigation into what Hampshire's Chief Constable did or didn't do be independent if the person investigating is the Chief Constable of Essex. Tallship
  • Score: 10

3:37pm Tue 10 Jun 14

stillhere says...

Public confidence in hants police and the Commissioner is damaged by the revelation in their own in house newspaper, available on their website. This reports their own staff survey as concluding that as few as 1 in 4 of the force have confidence in the leadership of their chief officers and only 1 in 5 feel valued by their chief officers.
Will the Chief Constable be held to account by the Commissioner for presiding over this decline in morale? Although Ch4's documentary on Kent's PCC was equally hilarious and frightening,to her credit she did at least seem to be trying to hold the chief to account on behalf of the public.
Public confidence in hants police and the Commissioner is damaged by the revelation in their own in house newspaper, available on their website. This reports their own staff survey as concluding that as few as 1 in 4 of the force have confidence in the leadership of their chief officers and only 1 in 5 feel valued by their chief officers. Will the Chief Constable be held to account by the Commissioner for presiding over this decline in morale? Although Ch4's documentary on Kent's PCC was equally hilarious and frightening,to her credit she did at least seem to be trying to hold the chief to account on behalf of the public. stillhere
  • Score: 5

7:53pm Tue 10 Jun 14

elvisimo says...

Tallship wrote:
Unbelievable, how can an investigation into what Hampshire's Chief Constable did or didn't do be independent if the person investigating is the Chief Constable of Essex.
Who would you suggest?
[quote][p][bold]Tallship[/bold] wrote: Unbelievable, how can an investigation into what Hampshire's Chief Constable did or didn't do be independent if the person investigating is the Chief Constable of Essex.[/p][/quote]Who would you suggest? elvisimo
  • Score: 0

10:19pm Tue 10 Jun 14

Tallship says...

elvisimo wrote:
Tallship wrote:
Unbelievable, how can an investigation into what Hampshire's Chief Constable did or didn't do be independent if the person investigating is the Chief Constable of Essex.
Who would you suggest?
I would suggest a judge or a similar person who has no connection to the police. Otherwise as in this case it's the funny handshake gang investigating one of thier own.
[quote][p][bold]elvisimo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tallship[/bold] wrote: Unbelievable, how can an investigation into what Hampshire's Chief Constable did or didn't do be independent if the person investigating is the Chief Constable of Essex.[/p][/quote]Who would you suggest?[/p][/quote]I would suggest a judge or a similar person who has no connection to the police. Otherwise as in this case it's the funny handshake gang investigating one of thier own. Tallship
  • Score: 2

7:19am Wed 11 Jun 14

Crazywolf says...

or just maybe he did do everything right? and someone else was keeping it all in the press in order to slur his name? or that of the school?
or just maybe he did do everything right? and someone else was keeping it all in the press in order to slur his name? or that of the school? Crazywolf
  • Score: 1

10:00am Wed 11 Jun 14

skeptik says...

Would like to see the forces amalgamated - from 43 down to 8 regional and the Met. Some of the money saved could be used to set up a completely separate non constabulary investigating branch to investigate all ranks, to charge where necessary and prosecute defaulters. The principal of nothing to hide and a clearly independent verdict. In todays world we have see too often that the establishment should not be police, judge and jury - in house.
Would like to see the forces amalgamated - from 43 down to 8 regional and the Met. Some of the money saved could be used to set up a completely separate non constabulary investigating branch to investigate all ranks, to charge where necessary and prosecute defaulters. The principal of nothing to hide and a clearly independent verdict. In todays world we have see too often that the establishment should not be police, judge and jury - in house. skeptik
  • Score: 1

11:05am Wed 11 Jun 14

Tallship says...

Crazywolf wrote:
or just maybe he did do everything right? and someone else was keeping it all in the press in order to slur his name? or that of the school?
The slur on the school's good name has done more damage. Police Chief Constables come and go. But a school like Stanbridge Earls earns a good reputation over many years.
[quote][p][bold]Crazywolf[/bold] wrote: or just maybe he did do everything right? and someone else was keeping it all in the press in order to slur his name? or that of the school?[/p][/quote]The slur on the school's good name has done more damage. Police Chief Constables come and go. But a school like Stanbridge Earls earns a good reputation over many years. Tallship
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree