Report this comment
  • "
    ohec wrote:
    loosehead wrote:
    ohec wrote:
    What is needed in this country is a housing market that is a true reflection of peoples earnings and in order to get that we need a massive price crash to bring property down to realistic levels so they are affordable for many more people thus reducing the strain on the rental market, you also appear to have the British obsession of buying houses, the so-called property ladder that surprise surprise not everybody wants to get on as you say you made your choice to go without a family holidays or a new car to save for that magical deposit but others would sooner have children holidays and cars its all a matter of choice.
    No they would rather have the maintenance & modernisation done for them whilst they have brand new cars & two holidays plus smart phones,smart TV's & then if that's threatened they go to the food bank rather than buy food.
    I know & anyone being honest knows Council/affordable housing was only ever intended for low paid working class people not well paid people who want to live the high life.
    If you weeded out the ones who could quite easily afford to buy I wonder how large the housing waiting list would be?
    You are obsessed with this idea that everybody wants to buy houses, its not just a case of being able to afford to buy its a case of whether you want to, in most countries buying or renting is a matter of choice and choice alone this idea that the only people that rent are those that can't afford to buy is totally wrong. I grant you that the situation is about to change as far as social housing is concerned but that will only apply to new tenants where the proposal is for time limited leases, the whole concept that your best investment is bricks and mortar has run its time and more and more people will revert back to renting not just out of choice but house prices have reached unsustainable levels so the only way for them to go is down.
    Please read this post! COUNCIL hoses are there for people WHO CAN'T AFFORD TO BUY.
    this was why they were created & not for THOSE WHO CAN AFFORD TO BUY.
    why should a couple both working in Sainsbury's get stuck in flats say top floor with children yet a family on good money live in a council home ?
    they should be in private housing & council homes should be for the low paid.
    Could a Labour supporter say Linesman or Lone Ranger comment on his subject?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Eastleigh residents protest over plans for 1,000 homes at beauty spot

Protesters at Stoneham Park campaign against the proposed development of more than 1,000 homes in the area. Protesters at Stoneham Park campaign against the proposed development of more than 1,000 homes in the area.

ANGRY residents have demonstrated at a beauty spot earmarked for more than 1,000 houses.

About 50 people went to Stoneham Park in Eastleigh to raise awareness that the greenfield land is under threat from the bulldozers.

The 61-acre site, near Chestnut Avenue, has appeared in Eastleigh Borough Council’s Draft Local Plan as a possible area to build 1,300 new homes.

Campaigners say it would lead to traffic chaos and destroy one of the last green gaps between Eastleigh and Southampton.

Protest organiser Pat Ford said she was happy with the turnout, but disappointed that more Eastleigh borough councillors did not turn up.

She said: “We asked all 44 councillors on the borough – five replied, 39 ignored us and none came.

“I think it’s disgusting.

“But it was a really good turnout.”

Eastleigh North’s Liberal Democrat councillor Chris Thomas, also the chairman of the council’s Eastleigh Local Area Committee, said: “Councillors have many commitments and in my case I did not actually receive an invitation.

However, in this case the local plan has got a long way to go and any representations would be more useful when made directly to the council.”

Related links

Related links

The leader of the council’s Conservative group, Councillor Godfrey Olson, said that he had been unable to attend.

He said: “I had been to a similar event three or four weeks beforehand when Mrs Ford took me around.

“I am totally opposed to building on that land for so many reasons.

It is a lovely rural setting, it will destroy the park, it will create traffic and it takes away recreational space.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree