New Forest RSS Feed


Developers’ new proposal for ex-chicken factory site in Lymington


IT has been almost a decade in the planning but this is the latest vision of how a multi-million pound waterfront development will look.

Developers have been repeatedly told to go back to the drawing board to come up with a suitable design for the £80m project at the former Webbs chicken factory site.

But as the public get ready to have their say as part of the consultation process, the latest design for the Bridge Road plot in Lymington has again come in from heavy criticism from planners.

The design has been described as “boxy” and “brutalist” by critics.

The revised scheme is for 195 private apartments, 93 social housing apartments, live-work units, a restaurant/retail and two other shops plus a public riverside walkway, on the site which has been vacant since 2001.

New Forest chief planning officer Chris Elliott said: “They say it picks up the themes of Georgian architecture. I’m not entirely convinced the people of Lymington will see it that way.”

‘Brutalist’ style While Dr Donald Mackenzie of the watchdog Lymington Society said: “Generally the committee feel they are unsuitable for the town. They may be suitable for a clifftop location where there’s lots of space around them.

“The style is too modern and brutalist. While they may have architectural merit they are totally unsuitable for the site.”

He said committee members liked the way Redrow had provided more open space and made the development part of the town with a bridge over the railway.

But four-storey buildings would be too dominant for the gateway site, Lymington should not suffer because a company has to make a profit and some of the finishing was a “tenuous link” to the town’s Georgian buildings, he added.

Redrow design director Trevor Wright said: “We look forward to receiving local feedback following the exhibition, which will be reviewed and considered by the project team. After which, we will continue to liaise with all parties, including the district council.”

The public consultation will take place between 11am and 3pm next Saturday.


Comments(6)

The Edge of Reason says...
8:48am Fri 6 Aug 10

93 social housing apartments, I bet the posh people of Lymington will love that.

jimbobbo says...
8:57am Fri 6 Aug 10

The Edge of Reason wrote:
93 social housing apartments, I bet the posh people of Lymington will love that.
Social housing does not necessarily mean council house dwelling folk who have never done a days work in their lives and persistently leave their child's toys strewn across the front lawn.

Social housing also includes HA schemes such as first time buyer & rent-to-buy; only available for those with jobs who cannot afford to get on the property ladder any other way.

MaximumAdrian says...
9:39am Fri 6 Aug 10

jimbobbo wrote:
The Edge of Reason wrote: 93 social housing apartments, I bet the posh people of Lymington will love that.
Social housing does not necessarily mean council house dwelling folk who have never done a days work in their lives and persistently leave their child's toys strewn across the front lawn. Social housing also includes HA schemes such as first time buyer & rent-to-buy; only available for those with jobs who cannot afford to get on the property ladder any other way.
So how are these 93 apartments to be split?
.
It only takes 2 or 3 from the underclass to ruin it for everyone else.

The Edge of Reason says...
9:51am Fri 6 Aug 10

jimbobbo wrote:
The Edge of Reason wrote:
93 social housing apartments, I bet the posh people of Lymington will love that.
Social housing does not necessarily mean council house dwelling folk who have never done a days work in their lives and persistently leave their child's toys strewn across the front lawn.

Social housing also includes HA schemes such as first time buyer & rent-to-buy; only available for those with jobs who cannot afford to get on the property ladder any other way.
Almost all council that have housing stock are registered social landlords (RSLs) social housing is exactly what it says on the tin.

Almost all new builds offer part rent part buy, they are called affordable homes, they also offer social housing as a way of convincing planners to approve their development, so the posh people of Lymington will be getting the people off the local authorities housing list, and I agree that they should.

My comment was not aimed at people on the council housing list but the people of Lymington who will further object to this development of those grounds that they don't want those people in their area.

TheVillager says...
11:33am Fri 6 Aug 10

I think you will find there is already social housing in and around Lymington. You will also find that not everyone in/around Lymington is 'posh', some of us just work hard for a living and are lucky enough to live in a nice place.

benwcox says...
3:27pm Tue 10 Aug 10

As a neighbouring property to the site, I have a NIMBY, but balanced attitude. Like many others, I'm not opposed to development of the site, but the fact of the matter remains that the site should not be over-devloped, both in height and density as proposed. There will be four story buildings whose ground level is level with the top of neighbouring garden fences (6 feet height)! There is not enough green space proposed, for all to enjoy because the devloper (understandably) would prefer not to loose money. However, is this developement to suit Lymington or the developer? A common request is - Please build something that is in keeping, attractive and something we can all be proud of. To achieve this, it really will mean a trip back to the drawing board.


TOO BOXY? An artist’s impression of the latest proposed design for the former chicken factory site. TOO BOXY? An artist’s impression of the latest proposed design for the former chicken factory site.

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses