Two rescued from car in flooded ford near Lyndhurst

Two rescued from car in flooded ford Two rescued from car in flooded ford

Two people were rescued from their car this afternoon after attempting to drive through a swollen ford in the New Forest.

The rescue was carried out by Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service, which urged motorists not to drive through floodwater as it was often deeper than it looked.

Crews from Lyndhurst and Hardley fire stations were called to Balmer Lawn Road in Brockenhurst just before 3pm.

Crew manager Peter Cooksey said: “Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service will continue to do its utmost to warn motorists of the risks of driving into deep water.

“Your vehicle may be swept away or become stranded. Vehicles can float away in just two feet of water.

“If your vehicle stalls, leave it immediately if safe to do so and seek higher ground. Don't travel in heavy rain storms unless absolutely necessary.”

Comments(4)

eurogordi says...
8:31pm Tue 9 Oct 12

Forgive me for asking, but where exactly is the ford in Balmer Lawn Road ? I often use this road and have never seen a ford. Part of the road under the railway bridge is prone to deep flooding, but I don't think that constitutes a ford.

Torchie1 says...
11:31pm Tue 9 Oct 12

eurogordi wrote:
Forgive me for asking, but where exactly is the ford in Balmer Lawn Road ? I often use this road and have never seen a ford. Part of the road under the railway bridge is prone to deep flooding, but I don't think that constitutes a ford.
That's because you know the road and the author of this article doesn't.

dopplershift says...
10:42am Wed 10 Oct 12

Whether it was under the railway bridge on Balmer Lawn Road (which it probably was) or the ford on Brookley Road both locations clearly have the measuring boards by the side of them which would have indicated high water level. If anything over a half a metre and you're risking it. As dumb as this article really.
.
If it was under the railway bridge then maybe Crew manager Peter Cooksey can explain how a car would be swept away? as in all tense and purposes it's just a puddle?

CruelDevil says...
5:31pm Wed 10 Oct 12

Appricating that these individuals required a rescue....but what a waste of emergency services resources!

Surely the people involved should be charged the cost of the rescue on the basis it was purely their stupidiy that caused the situation in the first place?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree