Report this comment
  • "Well noted Torchie. Southy could not provide any reference to this so called EU "ruling" - because it does not exist. If what he said was true (it isn't) then Hutchison Ports have more to worry about than Southampton as they would stand to lose their entire deep sea market to this Avonmouth Container Port expansion that Dopey thinks is a closely guarded secret (it isn't). The EU support some projects with funding but that is not the same thing as a "ruling". The UK govt has just spent £100m on W10 gauge clearance from Felixstowe to The WCML and there are over 30 trains a day using it - the Portishead side of the Avon doesn't even have a rail link at the moment!"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.

  • Enter the above word in the box below

Cabinet boss concerned by delays to decision on Southampton's £150m port expansion

First published in Southampton Daily Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Parliamentary Correspondent

THE MOST senior civil servant in the country has expressed his concern at delays to a decision on Southampton’s £150m port upgrade.

Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood said the proposed new investment, which will safeguard 2,000 jobs, was “welcome” and would be vital to the economy.

In his role at the head of the civil service, Sir Jeremy is said to be the most powerful unelected man in Britain.

His comments came as frustration grew over the time being taken by the Marine Management Organisation to reach a verdict on the £150m project.

The quango had been expected to make an announcement last week.

But a spokesman said: “We are still in the process of determining the application and are working very closely with the applicant. We expect to make a decision in the near future.”

Port owner ABP wants to combine the existing berths 201 and 202 as an increase in the length of container ships has meant the current deepsea berths, 204 to 207, can no longer handle four large vessels at once.

The expansion has been tied up in red tape, including an objection from the owners of rival port Felixstowe and claims of mistakes by the officials in charge of the planning process.

A verdict is needed as soon as possible because the work can only begin in a certain time window for environmental reasons. The major works must be carried out between September and March to avoid disturbing migratory Atlantic salmon.

The slow rate of progress was criticised by Southampton Itchen MP John Denham, pictured left.

He said: “I’m hugely frustrated.

There weren’t any significant objections, and no new issues were raised.

It’s over a month since the consultation ended – they should have made a decision by now."

Responding to a letter sent by Mr Denham, Sir Jeremy wrote: “Southampton and other container ports make a vital contribution to the UK economy. It is a welcome sign of confidence that ABP are willing to invest on the scale necessary to allow Southampton to handle the latest container vessels.

“I share your concerns that this significant investment has been delayed for so long, initially because of errors by those considering the necessary marine consents and later as the result of a judicial review sought by another port operator.”

Sir Jeremy said the MMO was making “every effort” to reach a swift decision but said neither ministers or senior officials could interfere in the process.

Comments (22)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree