Report this comment
  • "
    George4th wrote:
    Over the Edge wrote:
    George4th wrote:
    Over the Edge wrote:
    George4th wrote:
    MGRA wrote:
    Labour starting what they mean to continue... to restrain progress, uphold under-achievment, celebrate mediocraty and promote stagnation. The turkeys of southampton voted for christmas !!
    Correct! It will be a repeat of when they last held sway at SCC.
    >
    Labour deliberate and deliberate and talk and talk and talk and talk and by the time it comes to making a watered down decision all those in the process have run for cover!
    >
    Once you spook developers/investors you put them on notice that the project will be delayed indefinitely. Are those same developers/investors going to hang around waiting for SCC or develop/invest elsewhere?
    >
    Labour ideology hinders the progress of the very people they are supposed to represent. Southampton got left behind by the last Labour councils - time stood still in the City of Southampton for 25 years.
    >
    Unfortunately, Southampton suffers from the days of Union aggro and a reputation for trouble - it's still in the genes of some people and it drags Southampton down. Look around, everywhere outside Southampton (Hampshire/Dorset/Su





    ssex/Berkshire etc) has prospered and progressed far more than we have!
    I wish you Peter Baillie would stop scaremongering, of course the developers will wait, for simple fact that funding (PUSH) for developments like this is for specific areas only, in this case Townhill, similar developments have been delayed, take Thornhill for instance there was delay there at the start of the project, some 6 months if I'm not mistaken, the developer and housing association stayed on board and the development went ahead.

    Its in the councils best interests to allow regeneration programme like this to go ahead, I do think taking to reflect on the whole project is sensible, if there are saving to be made or if a cheaper alternative can be found, then in these times of Tory inflicted austerity, its best to so.

    Having said that the residents/tenants have been consulted and the proposal have been approved by them, so the new council really need to ensure the development happens.

    To me its a no brainer, offloading run down council accommodation and replacing it with new builds brings a community back to life, regardless of own the homes, Housing association, Council (by the way, all councils will be bringing the rents in line with housing associations soon anyway) or private.



    I think
    "I do think taking to reflect on the whole project is sensible, if there are saving to be made or if a cheaper alternative can be found, then in these times of Tory inflicted austerity, its best to so. "

    What is there to think about?! The SCC executives/senior management and everyone else concerned including the residents have said to go ahead!
    >
    The only possible reason for a delay is so that the new Labour council can say "we gave the final go ahead"!!
    >
    My money is on further delay..........
    A bit like the last Tory council saying that they regenerated Thornhill, when in fact the £48,7 million was given to the community by the last Government, the Tory council role to act as the accountable body, creaming of millions in interest because the money was held in the account and applying for funding to run there better homes project to the tune of £7 million plus loads more, Neighbourhood wardens, tidy team and lots more.

    Pot kettle black, I think George
    The Labour council will waffle the same as you have. All due diligence has been done on this project and the deal was done. It is either being delayed for ideology purposes or egos - you tell me which one. Its the residents who are losing out..........
    Did you see the BBC local news tonight?
    The Eco estate That the Tory council built in partnership with Radion?
    Williams was there & no mention of the previous councils part in it.
    When asked if the next phase would happen or if this was the way for the future Williams went on about scale of development & getting it cheaper?
    I've just got my Solar panels (25year lease of roof) & I'm now enjoying free energy in l=the hours of light.
    these houses will benefit from every energy saving device for council tenants?
    Why not allow council Tenants to have them & why not build more ECO homes?
    As for this development how many townhill residents have been writing in anti this development?
    Before stopping it has anyone asked them?
    people on here are going on about Romanse?
    Saving the now Labour Council £500,000 a year & helping pay the two posts created on £28,000 a year?
    This is about a ill thought out estate getting redeveloped & improved for council tenants because even if they live in a HA house they're still classified as council tenants,
    Take a look at the Homebid mag & see how many are HA properties?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

£100m scheme for Townhill Park in Southampton put on hold

Townhill Park residents take a look at the plans

Townhill Park residents take a look at the plans

First published in Southampton Daily Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Politics and business reporter

THE go-ahead for a £100m scheme to transform a Southampton estate has been put on hold, the Daily Echo can reveal.

In one of their first major decisions since coming to power the city council’s new Labour leaders have postponed any decision on the scheme for Townhill Park.

They say it is merely to have a closer look at the proposals, drawn up by the previous Tory administration which lost power at the local council elections earlier this month.

But Conservatives said they fear the delay means their ambitious plans to demolish five blocks of flats in Townhill Park to make way for up to 657 new homes and a shopping parade are now in jeopardy.

The proposals also include a “central park” to create a focus for community life, alongside a “village green,” which would provide a hub for community events and celebrations.

Under the scheme, around a third of the new homes would be sold off by the developers as payment for completing the work. The rest would be handed over to a housing association to manage, because they are able to bring in additional Government funding not offered to councils.

Former Tory housing boss councillor Peter Baillie said: “I have grave concerns that it's under threat and they will find an excuse not to go ahead with it. It will be a massive lost opportunity to improve the quality of life for residents and well as health, schools and the local economy.”

He added: “There’s a big lobby within Labour who don’t like the idea of selling off council land and that’s a big stumbling block.

“I do worry that it’s going to be ideological, that they want to keep control of land and houses.

“They want the council to be building everything. If they want to do that as an idea, they're going to price themselves out of doing it.

“We haven't got £100m -– we’ve got £10 or £20m.”

Cllr Baillie said despite accusations of “selling off the family silver”, the rebuilding project is the only way to achieve a “fundamental change” to an estate where 35 per cent of adults have no qualifications and there are serious health issues connected to economic problems.

Labour vow Despite the hold-up Labour have vowed to press ahead with the regeneration scheme. The council's new finance boss Councillor Simon Letts said a decision on the scheme would be made by the council on July 11 once the plans had been examined in detail.

He added: “It’s such a complex scheme it’s only right we take time to make sure we are happy with it. We don’t want to commit excess funding for this until we are absolutely certain.”

He said there would be a scheme in Townhill Park with broadly the same number of units, possibly with changes to the mix of houses.

He would not say at this stage whether the same amount of funds would be used until they had looked at the details.

“Broadly speaking it will be a similar scheme if not identical,” he added.

Cabinet member for housing councillor Warwick Payne added: “The decision regarding the Townhill Park regeneration framework will be taken in July 2012 rather than May 2012.

"Southampton City Council’s new administration are fully committed to estate regeneration and the Townhill Park scheme and look forward to bringing forward these exciting plans in July 2012.”

Comments (46)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree