Features
Testing the water for a new way to travel in Hampshire
 |
| The Sydney Waterbus |
STUCK in yet another rush hour traffic
jam on the M27, watching your
fuel gauge drop ever lower and feeling
your frustration levels raise
ever higher - you'd pretty much
rather be anywhere else. Well now a radical
proposal hidden away in a lengthy transport
document could change all that.
Imagine getting from Portsmouth to
Southampton, or vice-versa, in about half
an hour and instead of staring at the
bumper of the car in front of you, taking in
scenic views of the Isle of Wight or reading
the Daily Echo.
It may seem far-fetched - or blindingly
obvious - but the idea of a high-speed ferry
between the Solent cities this week became
a genuine possibility.
As revealed by the Echo, Hampshire's
transport chiefs have included a £15m Solent
waterbus service in a wish-list of schemes it
wants the Government to help fund over the
next 20 years.
Transport for South Hampshire - which is
made up of Hampshire County Council,
Southampton City Council and Portsmouth
City Council - say a massive £2.6 billion
upgrade of the region's transport network is
needed to stop it grinding to a halt.
The powerful joint committee's chair,
Councillor Mel Kendal, said he had no doubt
residents living along Hampshire's south
coast would one day catch a
waterbus to get to and from
work.
"I just can't believe that we
haven't actually, as a maritime
nation, done this already," he
said.
Of course other famous
coastal cities across the world
- including Sydney, Hong
Kong, Seattle and Singapore -
have been ferrying about their
residents and visitors for
years.
However, the idea of a Solent
water link is not a new one.
Gosport Borough Council's
longest serving councillor,
Peter Edgar, first floated the
idea more than ten years ago.
"We've got two great cities
in Portsmouth and
Southampton, both with
tremendous attractions, and
it's ridiculous not to link them
by water," the Tory councillor
said.
"In other parts of the world,
such as Singapore, these
water links have worked
extremely well and it just
amazes me that it's taken ten
years to get this thing off the
ground."
WATER transport is at the heart of famous coastal cities - and their transport
networks - across the world. As our roads get ever busier, authorities
are increasingly transforming their coasts into water highways.
No holiday to Sydney would be complete without a trip on a ferry or
JetCat, pictured, from Circular Quay to Manly. In fact, the ferry's iconic status
is central to Sydney's image as a harbour city.
Tourists can take in the sights of Sydney Harbour Bridge and the Opera
House, while for lucky residents, it's simply the fastest way to get to work
every day.
However, like all forms of public transport it has not been without its crisis.
Four people were killed last year when a ferry collided with another
vessel in the harbour.
In Singapore, watertaxis are one of the most popular ways of getting
around and a new green fleet of 20 electronic boats will begin nipping
across the harbour later this month.
While in the famous Italian water city of Venice, locals sick of being
crushed by hoards of tourists are being given their own waterbus service.
London has Britain's most extensive waterbus service, Thames Clipper,
which carries more than 20,000 passengers per week.
Packed with features such as wireless Internet and a cafe, cruising the
Thames is proving far more enjoyable than a gloomy journey on the Tube.
1:18pm Sunday 13th April 2008
Print 
Email this
CommentPosted by: hulla, baloo on 2:21pm Sun 13 Apr 08
This story was reported in the Echo recently,along with details of an earlier trial and prices, which to me, is why it did not work.
Far too expensive.
I notice a possible pricing structure has been left out of this story.
This story was reported in the Echo recently,along with details of an earlier trial and prices, which to me, is why it did not work.
Far too expensive.
I notice a possible pricing structure has been left out of this story.
Posted by: Andy, Locks Heath on 2:44pm Sun 13 Apr 08
If Councillor Kendall believes this then I doubt he is fit to be head of the South's Transport Policy. You only have to dig a few inches below the surface of this nonsense to realise it's not feasible as a transport option and can hardly be called an integrated option. Firstly a seaborne service will be disrupted by the weather unlike anything on the Thames so there is no comparison; the inherent unreliability will prevent it from ever generating jobs or wealth. There are no currently viable intermediate stops so it is suitable only for end to end journeys, furthermore any intermediate stop would add so much to time and labour costs that it would make the overall journey even more uneconomic. Capacity would be limited and inflexible so it could not be used as part of a mass commuting option. Talk of an onboard cafe is a nonsense (does it currently exist on the Cowes Redjets?) Marine regulations probably insist on passengers remaining seated anyway for high speed craft, and I doubt commuters will want to travel on anything like the Leisure Scene or Blue Funnel type craft! There is already a semifast FGW trains service from Portsmouth the Southampton that would exceed net City Centre to Centre timings and would also be cheaper, more frequent more reliable and able to run at speed after dark (There is no inshore shipping lane between Gosport and Calshot). What possible reasons does Cllr Kendall have for thinking that this service is viable other than "a nice sea view out of the window"? South Hants Transport deserves better than this infantile headline catching claptrap. Cllr Kendall - can we get South East Hants Rapid Transit back on the agenda please? How about Waterside Rail? How about rail-bus integration? How about safe cycle routes from the east into Southampton? How about subsidised travel for cycle users on Gosport and Hythe Ferries? How about single through ticketing? It's no good - I'm going to have to stand for election!
If Councillor Kendall believes this then I doubt he is fit to be head of the South's Transport Policy. You only have to dig a few inches below the surface of this nonsense to realise it's not feasible as a transport option and can hardly be called an integrated option. Firstly a seaborne service will be disrupted by the weather unlike anything on the Thames so there is no comparison; the inherent unreliability will prevent it from ever generating jobs or wealth. There are no currently viable intermediate stops so it is suitable only for end to end journeys, furthermore any intermediate stop would add so much to time and labour costs that it would make the overall journey even more uneconomic. Capacity would be limited and inflexible so it could not be used as part of a mass commuting option. Talk of an onboard cafe is a nonsense (does it currently exist on the Cowes Redjets?) Marine regulations probably insist on passengers remaining seated anyway for high speed craft, and I doubt commuters will want to travel on anything like the Leisure Scene or Blue Funnel type craft! There is already a semifast FGW trains service from Portsmouth the Southampton that would exceed net City Centre to Centre timings and would also be cheaper, more frequent more reliable and able to run at speed after dark (There is no inshore shipping lane between Gosport and Calshot). What possible reasons does Cllr Kendall have for thinking that this service is viable other than "a nice sea view out of the window"? South Hants Transport deserves better than this infantile headline catching claptrap. Cllr Kendall - can we get South East Hants Rapid Transit back on the agenda please? How about Waterside Rail? How about rail-bus integration? How about safe cycle routes from the east into Southampton? How about subsidised travel for cycle users on Gosport and Hythe Ferries? How about single through ticketing? It's no good - I'm going to have to stand for election!
Posted by: paul b on 3:18pm Sun 13 Apr 08
My motorbike is much better than a floating bus
My motorbike is much better than a floating bus
Posted by: lionel, Southampton on 4:19pm Sun 13 Apr 08
"There is no inshore shipping lane between Gosport and Calshot"
There is, it's called the North Channel, used by small coasters, dredgers and the like.
But apart from that, I agree with everything Andy said. If this story had been published on April 1st, it would undoubtedly be taken for an April Fool joke.
"There is no inshore shipping lane between Gosport and Calshot"
There is, it's called the North Channel, used by small coasters, dredgers and the like.
But apart from that, I agree with everything Andy said. If this story had been published on April 1st, it would undoubtedly be taken for an April Fool joke.
Posted by: King Mush, Woolston on 7:45pm Sun 13 Apr 08
I still miss the old Floating Bridge.
Sigh.......
I still miss the old Floating Bridge.
Sigh.......
Posted by: Andy, Locks Heath on 11:54pm Sun 13 Apr 08
Thanks Lionel - I stand corrected.
Thanks Lionel - I stand corrected.
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!