Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
9:00am Wednesday 12th December 2007
Click here to see the bigger picture
A GIANT wind turbine - almost double the size of Southampton Civic Centre clock tower - could be built in a mystery location in the city.
“It would be a landmark and some people would love it and some people would hate it, but the real benefit would be the 1,500 residents who’d get reduced energy bills.”
Councillor Gavin Dick
The enormous turbine - one of the biggest in the country - could soar a staggering 85m (279ft) into the sky, with rotating blades stretching 33m (108ft).
It's not the only turbine being considered for the city with plans to install one at every school.
Its location is being kept secret for commercial reasons. However the Daily Echo can reveal a windy, spacious site on the northern edge of the city has already been identified.
The single two megawatt turbine - potentially an iconic landmark in the south - would power up to 1,500 Southampton homes and mean cheaper power bills.
With a full public consultation to be launched in six months, the giant turbine - half the height of Portsmouth's Spinnaker Tower - could be spinning as early as 2009.
After conducting a survey of Southampton, the Energy Saving Trust yesterday singled out the secret site where it wants to build the giant turbine.
The tower would be installed at no cost to taxpayers and the energy consumption would be split between the city and the not for profit organisation.
The council would then be able to sell its 50 per cent share of power to either homes or small businesses.
The exact size will depend on wind speeds and wind generation in the area, but the council wants to build as big as possible and is looking to replicate the success of the 85m turbine on the M4 at Reading.
Councillor Gavin Dick, Cabinet member for Environment and Transport, pictured below, said: "This survey will determine the site of the turbine, but obviously we are looking to get the maximum energy consumption out of any turbine that is installed in the city.
"We will take into consideration the surrounding area, the views of residents and obviously there will be consultation with the city.
"It would be a landmark and some people would love it and some people would hate it, but the real benefit would be the 1,500 residents who'd get reduced energy bills."
In an effort to make Southampton the greenest city in the country, the council also wants 35 schools in the city to install their wind turbines to supply their own energy.
Cllr Dick added: "All the money that will be saved will be then be put back into education and they can spend more money on teaching the children."
To boost the number of residential wind turbines on roofs of city homes, the council will also scrap the £265 planning application fee.
The announcement comes days after the government revealed plans for every home in the UK to be powered by 7,000 offshore turbines by 2020.
Cllr Dick said the council was not looking at offshore wind farms because of the disruption it would cause to busy shipping lanes leading into the port.
Hiram Hackenbacker, Tracey Island says...
9:36am Wed 12 Dec 07
Harry Remmington, New Forest says...
9:38am Wed 12 Dec 07
A Southampton resident, says...
9:39am Wed 12 Dec 07
Waiting, says...
9:39am Wed 12 Dec 07
bemused onlooker, Southampton says...
9:44am Wed 12 Dec 07
last one out..., Romsey says...
9:44am Wed 12 Dec 07
In The Know, SOTON says...
10:02am Wed 12 Dec 07
Sparky, says...
10:03am Wed 12 Dec 07
gladstone, Southampton says...
10:05am Wed 12 Dec 07
deb havard, eastleigh says...
10:06am Wed 12 Dec 07
Power Pup, says...
10:09am Wed 12 Dec 07
sheitma pance, Soton says...
10:15am Wed 12 Dec 07
deb havard wrote:i hadn't thought of that. who wood benefit from such a project? i can only think that it is the yaughting fraternity that is behind this proposal as they are the only people i can think of that wood like it more windy.
this isn\'t a good idea, it\'s windy enough as it is it is whithout a massive wind terbine blowing across southampton, clothes driving on the line with be only good think. How are these terbines powered? electric presumablley. and whos going to pay for it? we are.. why dont the make some sola panels instead?
Apologetic, Southampton says...
10:17am Wed 12 Dec 07
deb havard wrote:I am sorry for having been taken-in. I genuinely though you were stupid and illiterate. I see now that I am the stupid one for being narked by a troll.
this isn't a good idea, it's windy enough as it is it is whithout a massive wind terbine blowing across southampton, clothes driving on the line with be only good think. How are these terbines powered? electric presumablley. and whos going to pay for it? we are.. why dont the make some sola panels instead?
Oh Flatulent One, Swamptown says...
10:19am Wed 12 Dec 07
deb havard wrote:Every now and then one gets a brief glimpse of the the darker side of humour....
this isn't a good idea, it's windy enough as it is it is whithout a massive wind terbine blowing across southampton, clothes driving on the line with be only good think. How are these terbines powered? electric presumablley. and whos going to pay for it? we are.. why dont the make some sola panels instead?
Geothermal?, says...
10:28am Wed 12 Dec 07
Da-na-na-na-na, Grammar-man!! says...
10:40am Wed 12 Dec 07
sheitma pance wrote:To both of you; if you're going to attempt humour, at least try and spell and punctuate properly. The punchline (if that's what you call it) is rather lost if you have to spend half the time reading it, trying to decipher what you've written.
deb havard wrote: this isn\'t a good idea, it\'s windy enough as it is it is whithout a massive wind terbine blowing across southampton, clothes driving on the line with be only good think. How are these terbines powered? electric presumablley. and whos going to pay for it? we are.. why dont the make some sola panels instead?i hadn't thought of that. who wood benefit from such a project? i can only think that it is the yaughting fraternity that is behind this proposal as they are the only people i can think of that wood like it more windy. once again its going to be the taxpayer picking up the bill to power this thing.
gladstone, Southampton says...
10:47am Wed 12 Dec 07
Geothermal? wrote:We do benefit from geothermal heat and power. Much of the city centre, including West Quay and the Civic Centre, are heated this way. It's unlikely that wind power from one turbine will meet the energy needs of the whole city. But should we rule out any ideas unless they solve the whole problem? There's a place for cynicism but sometimes you have to have a little trust.
I thought we were all going to benefit massively from geothermal energy, with combined heat and power. May be I\'m being cynical but I have a sneaking suspicion that there is some kind of grant available here, a target to be met, or at the most a PR opportunity. But cheap clean power to benefit a majority of the city\'s residents and businesses? No, not here. I wonder if there\'s a fact-finding trip being offered by Acme Wind Turbines to interested politicos....some where warm and not too windy.
E Word, says...
10:51am Wed 12 Dec 07
To both of you: if you're going to attempt humour, at least try to spell and punctuate properly. The punchline (if that's what you call it) is rather lost if one has to spend half the time reading it, trying to decipher what you've written.
Sheitma Pance, Soton says...
11:04am Wed 12 Dec 07
Dan Druff, says...
11:12am Wed 12 Dec 07
Da-na-na-na-na, Grammar-man!! says...
11:37am Wed 12 Dec 07
E Word wrote:I'm back! I think you're just nit-picking, E Word. Espcially given your close "k, thx, bye".
To both of you: if you're going to attempt humour, at least try to spell and punctuate properly. The punchline (if that's what you call it) is rather lost if one has to spend half the time reading it, trying to decipher what you've written.Some corrections as above. Style and sentence construction were also poor. Come back when you are worthy of your title. k, thx, bye.
Da-na-na-na-na, Grammar-man!! says...
11:40am Wed 12 Dec 07
Da-na-na-na-na wrote:Arsegrapes. I never said I was "Spelling Man ", did I? The correct spelling should have been "Especially". Forgive me people.
E Word wrote:I'm back! I think you're just nit-picking, E Word. Espcially given your close "k, thx, bye". Could do better. See me after class.To both of you: if you're going to attempt humour, at least try to spell and punctuate properly. The punchline (if that's what you call it) is rather lost if one has to spend half the time reading it, trying to decipher what you've written.Some corrections as above. Style and sentence construction were also poor. Come back when you are worthy of your title. k, thx, bye.
Another Denzil, Not quite Romsey says...
12:21pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Sheitma Pance wrote:In your case, no.
why have a go at my spelling?
do the opiniuns of dislecsics not count?
Phil the Sceptic, Winchester says...
12:37pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Fulloffedupness, Southampton says...
1:28pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Andy Pandy, Chandlers ford says...
1:37pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Robert, says...
2:34pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Lindsay Story, southampton says...
3:02pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Loed Ikea, Ikeaville says...
4:02pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Andy, Locks Heath says...
4:03pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Sheitma Pance, Soton says...
4:06pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Power Pup, says...
4:22pm Wed 12 Dec 07
On the subject of wind turbines, it is axiomatic that they cannot be relied upon to meet continuous energy demand, because the wind does not always blow; therefore a base of around ten to fifteen nuclear stations would also be required to guarantee that base load.
King Mush, Woolston says...
4:35pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Costa Baz, says...
4:41pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Red Rooster, Sholing says...
4:43pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Gunga Din, St Marys says...
4:55pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Farty Fart Pants, says...
5:18pm Wed 12 Dec 07
The Rt Hon B. Igcock, Member of the House of Commons, House of Commons says...
5:24pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Farty Fart Pants wrote:Nothing funny about it at all, actually!
What an unfortunate name... Cllr Dick
Old Git, Southampton says...
7:29pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Sydnee Guff Pants, SOUTH says...
8:09pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Sailor Steve, Chandler's Ford says...
9:31pm Wed 12 Dec 07
windy pants, says...
10:40pm Wed 12 Dec 07
Ian R, North Baddesley says...
12:32am Thu 13 Dec 07
anon, Totton says...
3:40am Thu 13 Dec 07
deb havard wrote:It won't produce more wind, you need to do a little research before putting stupid comments like this.
this isn\\\'t a good idea, it\\\'s windy enough as it is it is whithout a massive wind terbine blowing across southampton, clothes driving on the line with be only good think. How are these terbines powered? electric presumablley. and whos going to pay for it? we are.. why dont the make some sola panels instead?
WINDY, GOSPORT says...
6:46am Thu 13 Dec 07
hmm, says...
7:50am Thu 13 Dec 07
WINDY wrote:Where is that, Reading?
anyone who has taken notice of the weather over the last 3 days would
notice there has not been enough wind for one revolution of a wind
turbine,Last weekend no doubt it would have been going like the
proverbial, however I don't believe there are batteries big enough to
store the electricity yet. there is a similar rather large one on the
side of the m4 before you enter London, I don't think I've ever seen it
moving.
tucanofulano, USA says...
6:48am Mon 7 Jan 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
hmm, says...
9:25am Wed 12 Dec 07