Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
9:00am Tuesday 18th December 2007
GLOBAL WARMING may cause the world's seas to rise to more than TWICE the level currently predicted, latest research by Southampton scientists reveals.
Seas could rise dramatically - submerging coastal communities in the process and bringing devastation on a catastrophic scale.
“If we are right we’ll all be in trouble, for sure. It’s an enormous global sea level rise. For places like Bangladesh and the Nile Delta you will have really big problems because you cannot protect coastal flatlands."
Report author
The new research involved analysis of past sea levels which showed they rose by an average of 1.6 metres every 100 years the last time the Earth was as warm as it could become later this century.
Worryingly, these levels suggest current predictions of sea-level rises need to be more than doubled.
The study by a consortium of scientists from the National Oceanography Centre in Southampton and research centres in Tübingen (Germany), Cambridge and New York, is published this week in the new journal, Nature Geoscience.
It indicates that current beliefs about rising sea levels, based on the recent IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report, are far too low.
Lead author, Professor Eelco Rohling of the University of Southampton's School of Ocean and Earth Science, based at the National Oceanography Centre, said: "We're not predicting the future but we're looking at what the past is telling us in terms of how quick things can go. All the projections into the future are hanging on theoretical models and what we want is to put hard data behind it.
"What we're finding is rates of change are more than twice as high as the IPCC is predicting.
"The main reason for this is the IPCC is overlooking the large ice sheet and our research shows that's a very large component of rising sea levels.
"This would basically mean sea levels might rise up to two and a half times faster than the IPCC suggests. That has massive implications for any coastal infrastructure, especially in developing countries.
"If we are right we'll all be in trouble, for sure. It's an enormous global sea level rise. For places like Bangladesh and the Nile Delta you will have really big problems because you cannot protect coastal flatlands.
"In the UK anywhere lower than a man's height above sea level is going to be in trouble.
"What you have to take into account is also the increase in storminess that is being predicted - the storm surges that you may get. So it's the base line that you have to bring up. The margin of caution needs to be much wider than it would be on the basis of the IPCC report.
"The matter of potential climate change needs to be taken even more seriously. We need to really start looking at protecting certain areas and maybe we need to start giving up on others in a strategic way.
"My personal conviction is that we are going to be looking at quite a substantial level of sea level rise before any solutions to the problem may be put in place."
The new research involved looking at the last interglacial' - a snapshot of time some 124 to 119,000 years ago - when sea levels reached about six metres (20 feet) above the present, due to melt-back of ice sheets.
moose, winch says...
9:48am Tue 18 Dec 07
Its getting hotter and wetter, says...
10:20am Tue 18 Dec 07
Woody, Winchester says...
12:27pm Tue 18 Dec 07
Peter, Southampton says...
1:36pm Tue 18 Dec 07
hmm, says...
1:41pm Tue 18 Dec 07
i know best, dorset says...
5:07pm Tue 18 Dec 07
Bus Driver, Southampton says...
5:08pm Tue 18 Dec 07
hmm wrote:Nice comment and thought, shame the local council will not get behind it.
If we built lots of ice rinks this would help use up some of the water
Old Git, Southampton says...
6:19pm Tue 18 Dec 07
George, Cyprus says...
9:24pm Tue 18 Dec 07
cleverchap, southampton says...
9:54pm Tue 18 Dec 07
Noah, Winchester says...
11:04pm Tue 18 Dec 07
George wrote:Ignorance is bliss sometimes and common sense will probably prevail as it always does sooner or later.
I don't know what scares me the most, the scientific consensus on dangerous anthropogenic global climate destabilization, or the scientific ignorance displayed in full glory in all of the posts preceding mine.
deb havard, `13`1-960 says...
11:19pm Tue 18 Dec 07
Christoff, says...
2:43pm Wed 19 Dec 07
deb havard wrote:i love your posts. Best troll going.
its only global warming in the summer actualy havent you noticed that it very cold today and it hasn't rained for nearly a week i think hat this is scare monkeying on to stop people using their hoses
Old Git, Southampton says...
8:52pm Wed 19 Dec 07
George wrote:George, you really do scare too easily. I'm a scientist who’s analysed ‘the data’, so please don't humour me. This is a political scandal of global proportions, an ‘issue’ that ‘justifies’ taxes. Also, don't belittle the common sense of the 'ignorant masses’; their input (common sense) is far more relevant than that of neurotic environ-mentalists and devious public servants. You probably refer to the latter as politicians, i.e. dickheads
I don't know what scares me the most, the scientific consensus on dangerous anthropogenic global climate destabilization, or the scientific ignorance displayed in full glory in all of the posts preceding mine.
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Hiram Hackenbacker, Tracey Island says...
9:29am Tue 18 Dec 07
Worth reminding readers that that was not "human accelerated climate change" then and it isn't now.
Also I like sexist scientific measurements like "In the UK anywhere lower than a man's height above sea level is going to be in trouble". So that will be about 1.8m high then? They only taught the metric system to me at school in England!