OPEN WIDE: Hampshire residents have little to smile about when it comes to dental funding.
LESS money was spent on dental care in Hampshire than most other places in the country, new figures have revealed.
Hampshire health chiefs spent just £30 a head on dental care in the county - a massive 67 per cent lower than in some areas of the country.
The figures come as it was revealed that dental health among Southampton's under-fives was far worse than the national average.
Fluoridation
And they were published on the same day that Prime Minister Gordon Brown, pictured left, insisted fluoridation of the city's tap water would benefit residents.
The statistics, released by the Information Centre for Health and Social Care, showed expenditure on dental care increased by just 30 per cent over eight years between 1997/8 and 2005/6 - the lowest rate in the country.
Health bosses raised the amount they spent over the period from £41.9m to £54.4m while south Yorkshire increased its spend by 69 per cent.
advertisement
A spokesman from the National Association of Dentists said health bosses needed to ensure money was ploughed into areas like Southampton.
She said: "Where there are pockets of need, there should be greater funding in those areas.
"We would also call for PCTs to have access to dental expertise and professionals who can advise in terms of providing the appropriate care."
NHS South Central spokesman Sandra White said the figures appeared low as there may have been a lack of NHS dentists choosing to work in the area at the time.
She added that the state of residents' teeth was not necessarily linked to access to dental practices.
"The figures were bad because the amount spent was dependent on whether dentists wanted to set up in the area and how hard they worked," she said.
"There was a lack of dentists, but that was their choice - nobody had any power over them. These days the PCT has power over their contracts and funds are not lost when dental practices decide to leave.
"Also, when you look at provision of dentistry, you might find it is a different picture when you take into account the number of private practices."
The data refers to outlay in England on NHS dental care before the new dental contract came into force on April 1 2006.
Lets face it better nhs provision would have an impact on childrens teeth together perhaps with some dental education.
Not everyone, parents included, can afford private dental treatment - which has increased significantly over the past five years - and often private practices, if they still treat children on the nhs, will only do so if at least one parent regularly receives private treatment.
Also, pct's have been known to advise not taking fresh children (those who have not seen a dentist for a couple of years) onto do nhs work - another way of cutting costs?
Lets face it better nhs provision would have an impact on childrens teeth together perhaps with some dental education.
Not everyone, parents included, can afford private dental treatment - which has increased significantly over the past five years - and often private practices, if they still treat children on the nhs, will only do so if at least one parent regularly receives private treatment.
Also, pct's have been known to advise not taking fresh children (those who have not seen a dentist for a couple of years) onto do nhs work - another way of cutting costs?
[quote][bold]Jo[/bold] wrote:
Lets face it better nhs provision would have an impact on childrens teeth together perhaps with some dental education. Not everyone, parents included, can afford private dental treatment - which has increased significantly over the past five years - and often private practices, if they still treat children on the nhs, will only do so if at least one parent regularly receives private treatment. Also, pct's have been known to advise not taking fresh children (those who have not seen a dentist for a couple of years) onto do nhs work - another way of cutting costs?[/quote] Actually I can afford private dental treatment because I look after my teeth. Now if the underclass stopped eating junk and brushed a few times a day they could also afford private treatment - because it would cost them nothing.
Jo wrote:
Lets face it better nhs provision would have an impact on childrens teeth together perhaps with some dental education. Not everyone, parents included, can afford private dental treatment - which has increased significantly over the past five years - and often private practices, if they still treat children on the nhs, will only do so if at least one parent regularly receives private treatment. Also, pct's have been known to advise not taking fresh children (those who have not seen a dentist for a couple of years) onto do nhs work - another way of cutting costs?
Actually I can afford private dental treatment because I look after my teeth. Now if the underclass stopped eating junk and brushed a few times a day they could also afford private treatment - because it would cost them nothing.
Posted by: Hants, Ocean Village on 11:45pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I fail to see why tooth care cannot be provided by the NHS.
Are teeth not part of our health check up? We can go to the doctors for a FREE health check, surely teeth are part of our body?
So far teeth, eyes and almost hearing is becoming private. So what's next? The heart?
NHS stands for National Health Service which in my mind means ANYTHING to do with our health and therefore body. Teeth are part of the body, so why isn't it covered?
I fail to see why tooth care cannot be provided by the NHS.
Are teeth not part of our health check up? We can go to the doctors for a FREE health check, surely teeth are part of our body?
So far teeth, eyes and almost hearing is becoming private. So what's next? The heart?
NHS stands for National Health Service which in my mind means ANYTHING to do with our health and therefore body. Teeth are part of the body, so why isn't it covered?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
We ask you to keep your comments respectful and bear in mind the subject matter. Please avoid tasteless and abusive language. We reserve the right to pass on details to the police/and or the business which owns any computers being used to place inappropriate material. For more information see our terms and conditions.
Print
Email this
Comment
