Iain wrote:
To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can\'t then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can\'t stop their filthy habit.

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can't stop their filthy habit.

Chris wrote:

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can\'t then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can\'t stop their filthy habit.

Smoking should be banned in all public places indoors and out. If people want to smoke they should do so in private and not inflict their poison on those of us that value our lives.

Chris wrote:

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can\'t then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can\'t stop their filthy habit.

Smoking should be banned in all public places indoors and out. If people want to smoke they should do so in private and not inflict their poison on those of us that value our lives.

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can't stop their filthy habit.

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote:
To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can't stop their filthy habit.

c wrote:
L O L, why do most of the stories on here end up with people arguing about things that have nothing to do with the headline,

Keith Oftergrass wrote:
Widening the pavements ? Presumably by narrowing the roads, so how does that make it safer ? I suppose they\'ll get rid of roadside parking....

Also, what about the other £5M in the £6M scheme, presumably this will be to build a load of flats in dirty great tower blocks ?

c wrote:
Ime not having a go george, your entitled to you opinion, but its funny how the discussion changes , like the new lift in redbridge towers, everyone in the block was accused of being unemployed drug addics and the like.

saddened wrote:
Street furniture jsut encourages all day drinking and smoking. There are always drunks in the area. The atmosphere in London Road is horrendous. Some days, there are fights and then you have to walk through the cigarette smoke.One is also attacked by bullies on bikes. It is not pleasant to walk in to Southampton along this route. I now use the bus hardly leading to a healthy lifestyle.

Freda Wheeler wrote:
So, what they are going to do is to re-open all the roads that they closed off to traffic to make pedestian areas, then widen the payments... though I am muchly delighted to be aloowed to ride my bike down through the percinct without some pedestrian shouting at me to dismount, I am concerned at the cost to the public of undoing all the pedestrianised areas of the high street.

Chris wrote:

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can\\\'t then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can\\\'t stop their filthy habit.

Smoking should be banned in all public places indoors and out. If people want to smoke they should do so in private and not inflict their poison on those of us that value our lives.

allsaintsnocurves wrote:
When is the council going to realise that what southampton really needs is a public transportation system that connects all the main parts of southampton! My suggestion would be a mono rail type that could be raised above ground to reduce the traffic congestion that is only going to get worse from Ocean Village to the station! The longer time goes on the more disruption it will cause to put in!

Gilmore wrote:

allsaintsnocurves wrote: When is the council going to realise that what southampton really needs is a public transportation system that connects all the main parts of southampton! My suggestion would be a mono rail type that could be raised above ground to reduce the traffic congestion that is only going to get worse from Ocean Village to the station! The longer time goes on the more disruption it will cause to put in!

A what-o-rail?!

Gozza wrote:
Monorail? Lets start with a decent bus system before we get too ambitious!

Barney wrote:
What about us brain dead slobs?

Gilmore wrote:
Is there a chance the track could bend?

allsaintsnocurves wrote:

Gilmore wrote: Is there a chance the track could bend?

Have a look at this example of a monorail and tell me how much space this takes up on the ground?..and does it look like it can bend?? http://www.brianhaye s .com/images/monorail .jpg

Iain wrote:
I think she's trying to tell you that there's not a chance, my Shirley friend. My only concern is that the High Street will still be all cracked and broken.

I now suddenly want a Southampton Monorail!

Sweety wrote:
What was in the pudding can _ Plum Duff ?

JASON BOURNE, soton on 10:37am today

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can't stop their filthy habit.

NAZI!

Suzanne wrote:

JASON BOURNE, soton on 10:37am today

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can't stop their filthy habit.

NAZI!

You sound like a typical Millbrook drug using loser!!!

Suzanne wrote:

JASON BOURNE, soton on 10:37am today

disgusted wrote:

Iain wrote: To be fair, the fact that you have to walk through cigarette smoke is because people like you complained that you wanted all smokers out of buildings. You can't then complain when they smoke outside.

of course we can. Smokers are a blight and should be locked away if they can't stop their filthy habit.

NAZI!

You sound like a typical Millbrook drug using loser!!!