Politics RSS Feed


Politics

...but council chief wants to spend £100,000 on an image consultant


THE chief executive of cash strapped Southampton City Council wants to splash out £100,000 on a consultant to boost the council’s image.

Brad Roynon wants a “managing consultant” to bring in more experience running its media team which he thinks is not doing a good enough job.

He claimed council media staff were “not familiar with local government and its framework or structures” and that “media staff have relative inexperience in the area of media relations”.

The consultant – who will cost £15,000 to recruit – will become assistant head of communications and be paid more than head of communications (Liz Kite).

The job, replacing a soon to be vacant lower paid post, will be to review the work of the communication department, draw up an improvement plan and oversee its implementation, whilst also “running the media team”. It is believed a London based agency will be used.

Mr Roynon, the council’s highest paid public servant on more than £150,000 a year, will ask Tory council leaders to sign off the cash on Monday. The council spent £2.3m on publicity last year.

But he has told them: “There is an impression that the council is not always telling its story well in the media and that it could take a more proactive approach to bring this about.”

But Mark Wallace, campaign director at the Taxpayers’ Alliance blasted: “It’s disgusting that with everyone tightening their belts the council wants to splash out on another experienced spin doctor.”

“If the existing media staff aren’t good enough then the job should be paid for by getting rid of some of them.

“People don’t pay their council tax so that spin doctors can tell them the council is good.

“The council should just do a good job in the first place.”

Mr Roynon also wants to create two new assistant chief executives – one for strategy and the other, a £132,000 job to oversee economic development - under a restructuring plan.

Other departments will have to find savings of £200,000 to pay for the changes.

It comes as a panel of six councillors agreed in secret to hand 22 chief officers pay rises by upgrading salary bandings by up to 13 per cent.

Unison branch secretary Mike Tucker said. “Council workers will be concerned at a time when the council is proposing to privatise jobs and make redundancies the number of senior management jobs is being increased.

“When the council is directly providing less services there seems to be no reason to increase the number of senior managers within the council.”


Your Say YourEcho

AngrySotonResident, says...
3:50pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Another report of stupidity from our council and one if it's members. Instead of using the money to help i.e. pensioners etc this fool wants to blow it on another consultancy firm that will, to be honest, not benefit the public in any shape or form.

Sack this fool!

Roy S, Southampton says...
3:51pm Sat 25 Oct 08

In view of the financial problems facing the council, perhaps the councillors should have a whip round themselves to pay for this...

Vonnie, Southampton says...
4:10pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Unison branch secretary Mike Tucker said. “Council workers will be concerned at a time when the council is proposing to privatise jobs and make redundancies the number of senior management jobs is being increased.

All Chiefs and no Indians, but which Union do these managers belong to? Unison?

gusmat, southampton says...
4:26pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Why are these people allowed to be so arrogant in spending our money on whatever fancy takes them. Can nothing be done to stop them?

Condor Man, Southampton says...
5:23pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Mike Tucker did nothing when Southampton City Training staff were forced to join City College nor when loads were TUPE'd over to Capita. Both organisations have culled since.

The best thing to do is write to Cllr Samuels and say you want the likes of Roynon, Williamson and Webster to be sacked for failing to deliver and turning Southampton into a 3rd rate city at best. I went to Salisbury today and was amazed at the lack of ne'er do wells - 20 miles away the city is being ruined by them.

pob, says...
6:56pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Has our overpaid council leader no shame? I think Southampton's image might be better enhanced if he spent this £100000 of our money on enhancing our potholed roads, public transport and other benefits of real value to the ratepayers. At the moment the image that most readily springs to mind is that of too many of our councillors and officers putting themselves ahead of the interests of the people who employ them at great cost.

RJG, Bitterne Park says...
7:34pm Sat 25 Oct 08

So the Tories have got the shakes and decided they want to use the organs of local government to get their message across better than they've been doing up until now. I don't really know how a PR consultant could more effectively spin 'we're taking away your free swimming / bus pass / school meals,' but then again I'm not paid £100k.

Just one word of warning though- Brad Roynon has been put in a very awkward position by the Tories, settling their internal squabbles and now taking the flak for their new profligate spending. People shouldn't be distracted- ultimately it should be the political masters rather than their servants that pay for this decision.

mr.southampton, Southampton says...
7:40pm Sat 25 Oct 08

I love the quote that the current media staff are “not familiar with local government and its framework or structures” These people are on huge salaries compared to other people employed by the council, like home care workers who actually make a real difference, will an outside consultancy make it any better though, or will it be a shambles like the Capita outsourcing.

bunneymen, southampton says...
7:52pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Very disturbing story, I assume not only has he just obtained a massive wage increase, along with other chief officers, he now appears laying the ground work for his next pay rise. After all, the more responsibility you have the higher the wage.
Still it sounds like a few constructive dismissal cases coming up in the ex media department.
Just a thought, the person leaving isn't the one coming back as a consultant on pay X 5 is it? as that kind of thing should not be allowed because I'm sure it has never happened before.
Perhaps the new lot can introduce a better way of being able to complain about the officers and members, a way that actually does something instead of the ever enlarging sandpit they all bury their heads in.
Serve the people of Southampton, I think not. There's only one being served here.


owen_thesaints, The forgotten side of the City says...
9:04pm Sat 25 Oct 08

"He claimed council media staff were “not familiar with local government and its framework or structures” and that “media staff have relative inexperience in the area of media relations”. "

May I suggest then you sack them and get people in who are up to the job instead!

bunneymen, southampton says...
9:32pm Sat 25 Oct 08

As the chief exec now appears to talk direct to the Echo perhaps they could ask him if he was involved in the appointment of Liz Kite 3 years ago. Appointed to improve the image of the council, some appointment from the sound of it, he clearly believes she has failed at her job. Why wasn't she shipped out after her probation period, that would have saved some money.

There already is a head of economic development. If he isn't doing his job why is still here?

The problem is that the public believe that our council never sacks the incompetent staff, it just promotes them.

sadtobehere, Southampton says...
9:39am Sun 26 Oct 08

It is time the people were allowed to have a say in how the money is spent on the priorities for the city. There should be no pay awards until the city has visible improvements in education for all, public transport and roads.
The pay awards should be cancelled immediately and people with common sense employed. There is a wealth of talent in this city - spin doctors are not needed.

WouldratherliveinPompey, Southampton says...
10:10am Sun 26 Oct 08

Anyone else see the irony of the Echo bashing local council media and plans for a 'Spin Doctor' when it is the Echos negative reporting policies that make it necessary?

Ciaran, Southampton says...
6:30pm Sun 26 Oct 08

WouldratherliveinPom
pey
wrote:
Anyone else see the irony of the Echo bashing local council media and plans for a 'Spin Doctor' when it is the Echos negative reporting policies that make it necessary?
Hardly ironic, is it. If the media office can't do their job, what's the point in them?

As our local paper, it is the Echo's job to criticise the council if it's not doing the job it is elected (and appointed) to do.

If the council worked well, there wouldn't be anything negative for the Echo's hacks to report!

mr_lee_white@hotmail.com, Southampton says...
1:41pm Mon 27 Oct 08

Just exactly WHO are these Council executives reporting to?

Why do we need to publicise the Council or its services at all?

If I could send a message to them, it would be: "Just collect our rubbish, light our streets, mow the parks lawns, fix the roads and plan the town, do the basics and forget playing at big business"...






Your sayYour Echo

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.

Brad Roynon Brad Roynon

Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »