Motorists feared body left hanging on bridge over M27

Daily Echo: Hanging body prank branded thoughtless by police Hanging body prank branded thoughtless by police

MOTORISTS inundated police with reports that ‘a body’ was hanging from a footbridge over a Hampshire motorway.

Police received a number of calls from concerned drivers who saw the figure hanging from the bridge at Copythorne.

However, when police arrived just before 6am today they discovered it was a dummy that had been covered with a sheet in a suspected prank.

Inspector Bernadette Smith of Hampshire police described the prank as “thoughtless and irresponsible”

She said: “It was very distracting and distressing for the motorists on the M27 this morning and both thoughtless and irresponsible of the people who decided to place it there.”

No delays or accidents were reported as a result of the incident.

Comments (48)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:36am Tue 4 Sep 12

ToastyTea says...

that's pretty funny to be fair.
that's pretty funny to be fair. ToastyTea
  • Score: 0

9:47am Tue 4 Sep 12

bazzeroz says...

ToastyTea wrote:
that's pretty funny to be fair.
You must be some sort of moron to be fair!
[quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: that's pretty funny to be fair.[/p][/quote]You must be some sort of moron to be fair! bazzeroz
  • Score: 0

9:49am Tue 4 Sep 12

hulla baloo says...

ToastyTea wrote:
that's pretty funny to be fair.
Not if you were driving at 70mph and thought it was a real person, could have caused a serious accident and possible loss of life. To be fair.
[quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: that's pretty funny to be fair.[/p][/quote]Not if you were driving at 70mph and thought it was a real person, could have caused a serious accident and possible loss of life. To be fair. hulla baloo
  • Score: 0

9:51am Tue 4 Sep 12

sparkster says...

im all for a prank thats what makes the world go round but im sorry i dont find that funny, i know it didnt thank goodness but it could have caused a serious accident
im all for a prank thats what makes the world go round but im sorry i dont find that funny, i know it didnt thank goodness but it could have caused a serious accident sparkster
  • Score: 0

9:51am Tue 4 Sep 12

tiggerlou says...

Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
Well toastytea is a troll to be fair tiggerlou
  • Score: 0

9:52am Tue 4 Sep 12

jonnyx says...

ToastyTea wrote:
that's pretty funny to be fair.
i've followed your recent comments with interest toastytea, and i think it's clear that bazzeroz has hit the nail on the head in his above post.
[quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: that's pretty funny to be fair.[/p][/quote]i've followed your recent comments with interest toastytea, and i think it's clear that bazzeroz has hit the nail on the head in his above post. jonnyx
  • Score: 0

10:12am Tue 4 Sep 12

Georgem says...

tiggerlou wrote:
Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
[quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that. Georgem
  • Score: 0

10:17am Tue 4 Sep 12

ToastyTea says...

Georgem wrote:
tiggerlou wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
Thanks George, appreciated.
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that.[/p][/quote]Thanks George, appreciated. ToastyTea
  • Score: 0

10:19am Tue 4 Sep 12

Georgem says...

ToastyTea wrote:
Georgem wrote:
tiggerlou wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
Thanks George, appreciated.
You're most welcome.
[quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that.[/p][/quote]Thanks George, appreciated.[/p][/quote]You're most welcome. Georgem
  • Score: 0

10:39am Tue 4 Sep 12

rightway says...

Lets stop being fair, to be fair.
Lets stop being fair, to be fair. rightway
  • Score: 0

10:54am Tue 4 Sep 12

ToastyTea says...

rightway wrote:
Lets stop being fair, to be fair.
Ok fair point.
[quote][p][bold]rightway[/bold] wrote: Lets stop being fair, to be fair.[/p][/quote]Ok fair point. ToastyTea
  • Score: 0

11:36am Tue 4 Sep 12

hulla baloo says...

Georgem wrote:
ToastyTea wrote:
Georgem wrote:
tiggerlou wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
Thanks George, appreciated.
You're most welcome.
2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that.[/p][/quote]Thanks George, appreciated.[/p][/quote]You're most welcome.[/p][/quote]2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society? hulla baloo
  • Score: 0

11:47am Tue 4 Sep 12

Georgem says...

hulla baloo wrote:
Georgem wrote:
ToastyTea wrote:
Georgem wrote:
tiggerlou wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
Thanks George, appreciated.
You're most welcome.
2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?
No, that's been going for years. We're relative johnny-come-latelys.
[quote][p][bold]hulla baloo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that.[/p][/quote]Thanks George, appreciated.[/p][/quote]You're most welcome.[/p][/quote]2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?[/p][/quote]No, that's been going for years. We're relative johnny-come-latelys. Georgem
  • Score: 0

2:38pm Tue 4 Sep 12

burgerboy says...

Georgem wrote:
hulla baloo wrote:
Georgem wrote:
ToastyTea wrote:
Georgem wrote:
tiggerlou wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
Thanks George, appreciated.
You're most welcome.
2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?
No, that's been going for years. We're relative johnny-come-latelys.
Why don't you two just get a room.!!!
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hulla baloo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that.[/p][/quote]Thanks George, appreciated.[/p][/quote]You're most welcome.[/p][/quote]2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?[/p][/quote]No, that's been going for years. We're relative johnny-come-latelys.[/p][/quote]Why don't you two just get a room.!!! burgerboy
  • Score: 0

2:47pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Georgem says...

burgerboy wrote:
Georgem wrote:
hulla baloo wrote:
Georgem wrote:
ToastyTea wrote:
Georgem wrote:
tiggerlou wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair
A fairly successful one, at that.
Thanks George, appreciated.
You're most welcome.
2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?
No, that's been going for years. We're relative johnny-come-latelys.
Why don't you two just get a room.!!!
What are you talking about? We have! Get out of our room, pervert! We're paying for this by the hour.
[quote][p][bold]burgerboy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]hulla baloo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]tiggerlou[/bold] wrote: Well toastytea is a troll to be fair[/p][/quote]A fairly successful one, at that.[/p][/quote]Thanks George, appreciated.[/p][/quote]You're most welcome.[/p][/quote]2 founder members of the mutual appreciation society?[/p][/quote]No, that's been going for years. We're relative johnny-come-latelys.[/p][/quote]Why don't you two just get a room.!!![/p][/quote]What are you talking about? We have! Get out of our room, perv[bold][/bold]ert! We're paying for this by the hour. Georgem
  • Score: 0

3:17pm Tue 4 Sep 12

burgerboy says...

Your not the bloke that went into sainsburys and took a picture of his d**k on a display i-pod for all to see, as reported in the bournemouth echo.(;o)
Your not the bloke that went into sainsburys and took a picture of his d**k on a display i-pod for all to see, as reported in the bournemouth echo.(;o) burgerboy
  • Score: 0

3:35pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Darren38400 says...

I appreciate it must have been distressing for those who drove under this but it is a bit funny.
I appreciate it must have been distressing for those who drove under this but it is a bit funny. Darren38400
  • Score: 0

3:35pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Darren38400 says...

I appreciate it must have been distressing for those who drove under this but it is a bit funny.
I appreciate it must have been distressing for those who drove under this but it is a bit funny. Darren38400
  • Score: 0

3:38pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Darren38400 says...

I wonder if anybody saw anyone "hanging around" the bridge last night?
I wonder if anybody saw anyone "hanging around" the bridge last night? Darren38400
  • Score: 0

3:38pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Darren38400 says...

I wonder if anybody saw anyone "hanging around" the bridge last night?
I wonder if anybody saw anyone "hanging around" the bridge last night? Darren38400
  • Score: 0

5:00pm Tue 4 Sep 12

BillyTheKid says...

What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous. BillyTheKid
  • Score: 0

5:09pm Tue 4 Sep 12

100%HANTSBOY says...

Story posted 07.54 this morning,not exactly "Breaking" noose,more like old noose now!
Story posted 07.54 this morning,not exactly "Breaking" noose,more like old noose now! 100%HANTSBOY
  • Score: 0

5:15pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Huffter says...

"No delays or accidents" - sounds like an improvement to the usual situation on the M27!
"No delays or accidents" - sounds like an improvement to the usual situation on the M27! Huffter
  • Score: 0

6:29pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Georgem says...

BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
[quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments! Georgem
  • Score: 0

7:18pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Inform Al says...

Seems like all the cretins, bigots and inbreds in Southampton are posting here today.
Seems like all the cretins, bigots and inbreds in Southampton are posting here today. Inform Al
  • Score: 0

8:48pm Tue 4 Sep 12

sparkster says...

I agree with BillyTheKid it could have had serious consequences and what if any of the motorists had a heart complaint, a prank is a prank but that was downright bloody stupid
I agree with BillyTheKid it could have had serious consequences and what if any of the motorists had a heart complaint, a prank is a prank but that was downright bloody stupid sparkster
  • Score: 0

9:12pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Sir Ad E Noid says...

Darren38400 wrote:
I appreciate it must have been distressing for those who drove under this but it is a bit funny.
A retard.
[quote][p][bold]Darren38400[/bold] wrote: I appreciate it must have been distressing for those who drove under this but it is a bit funny.[/p][/quote]A retard. Sir Ad E Noid
  • Score: 0

9:14pm Tue 4 Sep 12

Sir Ad E Noid says...

ToastyTea wrote:
that's pretty funny to be fair.
And a relative of yours Darren, exhibiting the same symptoms as your good self.
[quote][p][bold]ToastyTea[/bold] wrote: that's pretty funny to be fair.[/p][/quote]And a relative of yours Darren, exhibiting the same symptoms as your good self. Sir Ad E Noid
  • Score: 0

9:49pm Tue 4 Sep 12

BillyTheKid says...

Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny. BillyTheKid
  • Score: 0

12:36am Wed 5 Sep 12

Tracykelisha says...

Ur bloody sad I fink this is sick ok as yes it cud of caue
Sed a crash toastytea u werido grow up
Ur bloody sad I fink this is sick ok as yes it cud of caue Sed a crash toastytea u werido grow up Tracykelisha
  • Score: 0

8:49am Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
[quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting. Georgem
  • Score: 0

9:26am Wed 5 Sep 12

burgerboy says...

Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
Well said Georgem,Go and get a life and a sense of humour,"Billy the Flid".
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.[/p][/quote]Well said Georgem,Go and get a life and a sense of humour,"Billy the Flid". burgerboy
  • Score: 0

9:42am Wed 5 Sep 12

rightway says...

burgerboy wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
Well said Georgem,Go and get a life and a sense of humour,"Billy the Flid".
I for one would never defend Billy the kid, but to refer to someone as a "flid" shows what a small minded, nasty little boy you are. Go sit alone in a dark room when you sneer at those born this way through no fault of their own.
[quote][p][bold]burgerboy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.[/p][/quote]Well said Georgem,Go and get a life and a sense of humour,"Billy the Flid".[/p][/quote]I for one would never defend Billy the kid, but to refer to someone as a "flid" shows what a small minded, nasty little boy you are. Go sit alone in a dark room when you sneer at those born this way through no fault of their own. rightway
  • Score: 0

10:15am Wed 5 Sep 12

CruelDevil says...

Tracykelisha wrote:
Ur bloody sad I fink this is sick ok as yes it cud of caue Sed a crash toastytea u werido grow up
Want to try that again in English?
[quote][p][bold]Tracykelisha[/bold] wrote: Ur bloody sad I fink this is sick ok as yes it cud of caue Sed a crash toastytea u werido grow up[/p][/quote]Want to try that again in English? CruelDevil
  • Score: 0

12:57pm Wed 5 Sep 12

ilogik_23 says...

CruelDevil wrote:
Tracykelisha wrote: Ur bloody sad I fink this is sick ok as yes it cud of caue Sed a crash toastytea u werido grow up
Want to try that again in English?
To be fair toasty tea that's quite funny you pointed out about the spelling, Hilarious! However must agree with Bazzeroz and say it's not funny at all really, although not going to call you a moron, but I will say ' just think a little ' ...
[quote][p][bold]CruelDevil[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tracykelisha[/bold] wrote: Ur bloody sad I fink this is sick ok as yes it cud of caue Sed a crash toastytea u werido grow up[/p][/quote]Want to try that again in English?[/p][/quote]To be fair toasty tea that's quite funny you pointed out about the spelling, Hilarious! However must agree with Bazzeroz and say it's not funny at all really, although not going to call you a moron, but I will say ' just think a little ' ... ilogik_23
  • Score: 0

1:06pm Wed 5 Sep 12

ilogik_23 says...

And even funnier is that it was actually CruelDevil that pointed it out! But again, reading all the stupid comments there are some right berks around who fill their time slating and being immature about these things. I guess these people haven't experienced anything tragic yet in their lives, maybe that'll change their views when they do, but who knows.....
And even funnier is that it was actually CruelDevil that pointed it out! But again, reading all the stupid comments there are some right berks around who fill their time slating and being immature about these things. I guess these people haven't experienced anything tragic yet in their lives, maybe that'll change their views when they do, but who knows..... ilogik_23
  • Score: 0

2:20pm Wed 5 Sep 12

CruelDevil says...

ilogik_23 wrote:
And even funnier is that it was actually CruelDevil that pointed it out! But again, reading all the stupid comments there are some right berks around who fill their time slating and being immature about these things. I guess these people haven't experienced anything tragic yet in their lives, maybe that'll change their views when they do, but who knows.....
thank you!
[quote][p][bold]ilogik_23[/bold] wrote: And even funnier is that it was actually CruelDevil that pointed it out! But again, reading all the stupid comments there are some right berks around who fill their time slating and being immature about these things. I guess these people haven't experienced anything tragic yet in their lives, maybe that'll change their views when they do, but who knows.....[/p][/quote]thank you! CruelDevil
  • Score: 0

2:31pm Wed 5 Sep 12

BillyTheKid says...

Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did.

As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply.

Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer.

Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway.

Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me.

I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right.

You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this.

There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.[/p][/quote]Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did. As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply. Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer. Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway. Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me. I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right. You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this. There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us. BillyTheKid
  • Score: 0

2:46pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did.

As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply.

Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer.

Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway.

Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me.

I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right.

You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this.

There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.
As I've said in the past, Billy, you seem to think every reply is some sort of attempt to provoke you. I must say, conversations with you in real life must be rather dull if this is how you react. All your friends and family must be creeping around you on conversational eggshells, lest you accuse them of attacking you all the time.

Why is it, every time someone responds to your posts, you find it necessary to reply with a billion paragraphs on why they're such a terrible person? Did it ever occur to you to just reply to the post? Give it a go.
[quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.[/p][/quote]Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did. As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply. Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer. Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway. Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me. I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right. You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this. There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.[/p][/quote]As I've said in the past, Billy, you seem to think every reply is some sort of attempt to provoke you. I must say, conversations with you in real life must be rather dull if this is how you react. All your friends and family must be creeping around you on conversational eggshells, lest you accuse them of attacking you all the time. Why is it, every time someone responds to your posts, you find it necessary to reply with a billion paragraphs on why they're such a terrible person? Did it ever occur to you to just reply to the post? Give it a go. Georgem
  • Score: 0

2:49pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

Billy, if you think pulling the "poor victim" card out for the eight-hundredth time is going to allow you to troll and insult people with impunity, think again. You might have said you were going to ignore Evil GeorgeM(tm)'s posts, but you've said that before, and failed. Your ego won't allow you to stop trying to treat everyone like your former pupils.
Billy, if you think pulling the "poor victim" card out for the eight-hundredth time is going to allow you to troll and insult people with impunity, think again. You might have said you were going to ignore Evil GeorgeM(tm)'s posts, but you've said that before, and failed. Your ego won't allow you to stop trying to treat everyone like your former pupils. Georgem
  • Score: 0

3:02pm Wed 5 Sep 12

BillyTheKid says...

Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did.

As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply.

Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer.

Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway.

Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me.

I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right.

You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this.

There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.
As I've said in the past, Billy, you seem to think every reply is some sort of attempt to provoke you. I must say, conversations with you in real life must be rather dull if this is how you react. All your friends and family must be creeping around you on conversational eggshells, lest you accuse them of attacking you all the time.

Why is it, every time someone responds to your posts, you find it necessary to reply with a billion paragraphs on why they're such a terrible person? Did it ever occur to you to just reply to the post? Give it a go.
Your post, as I expected, is nothing but provocative fiction.
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.[/p][/quote]Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did. As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply. Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer. Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway. Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me. I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right. You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this. There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.[/p][/quote]As I've said in the past, Billy, you seem to think every reply is some sort of attempt to provoke you. I must say, conversations with you in real life must be rather dull if this is how you react. All your friends and family must be creeping around you on conversational eggshells, lest you accuse them of attacking you all the time. Why is it, every time someone responds to your posts, you find it necessary to reply with a billion paragraphs on why they're such a terrible person? Did it ever occur to you to just reply to the post? Give it a go.[/p][/quote]Your post, as I expected, is nothing but provocative fiction. BillyTheKid
  • Score: 0

3:04pm Wed 5 Sep 12

BillyTheKid says...

Georgem wrote:
Billy, if you think pulling the "poor victim" card out for the eight-hundredth time is going to allow you to troll and insult people with impunity, think again. You might have said you were going to ignore Evil GeorgeM(tm)'s posts, but you've said that before, and failed. Your ego won't allow you to stop trying to treat everyone like your former pupils.
Ya-da ya-da ya-da............evi
l george, former pupils, ego.........ya-da, ya-da, ya-da.......
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: Billy, if you think pulling the "poor victim" card out for the eight-hundredth time is going to allow you to troll and insult people with impunity, think again. You might have said you were going to ignore Evil GeorgeM(tm)'s posts, but you've said that before, and failed. Your ego won't allow you to stop trying to treat everyone like your former pupils.[/p][/quote]Ya-da ya-da ya-da............evi l george, former pupils, ego.........ya-da, ya-da, ya-da....... BillyTheKid
  • Score: 0

3:16pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
BillyTheKid wrote:
What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.
No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments!
My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.
Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.
Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did.

As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply.

Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer.

Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway.

Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me.

I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right.

You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this.

There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.
As I've said in the past, Billy, you seem to think every reply is some sort of attempt to provoke you. I must say, conversations with you in real life must be rather dull if this is how you react. All your friends and family must be creeping around you on conversational eggshells, lest you accuse them of attacking you all the time.

Why is it, every time someone responds to your posts, you find it necessary to reply with a billion paragraphs on why they're such a terrible person? Did it ever occur to you to just reply to the post? Give it a go.
Your post, as I expected, is nothing but provocative fiction.
*sigh* tragic, really.
[quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: What a lot of mindless, pointless drivel you all write about a matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous.[/p][/quote]No different to commenting on nothing other than your distaste for other people's comments![/p][/quote]My comment on the article : it is a "matter that is both serious and potentially hazardous", ie not funny.[/p][/quote]Cherry-pick words from your post all you like; you're still - as ever - only interested in telling others how they should be commenting.[/p][/quote]Basseroz, hulla baloo, sparkster, jonnyx, ilogik, Inform Al, Sir Ad E Noid, and Tracykelisha all indicate disapproval of the stunt, and some criticise those who think it funny, as I did. As a rule, nobody responds to your posts, Georgem, so you deliberately misinterpret or provoke people to elicit some reply. Until about a week ago, I have challenged you at every opportunity to highlight your sad activities here. You, together with Lone Ranger, clausentum, rightway, stillness and one or two others have been responsible for some very unpleasant trolling in the past, where you have all collectively victimised me. In fighting back, my own credibility has been compromised a little, but time is a great healer. Recently, you have complained about me hounding you. Last week, to bring these altercations to an end, I said I would no longer respond to any of your posts, and asked you to do the same with mine. You had already stated you would ignore mine in future anyway. Yet, this is the third time since last week you have attempted to provoke a reaction from me. I'm just letting you know that I recognise your strategies, and that ignoring them is not an admission that you are right. You spend all day every day posting shallow, insignificant comments on this forum, most of the time trying to get other people to engage with you. And you know I am not the first to mention this. There is no need for you to reply to this post. Let's see if you have the self-control to make this the very last communication between us.[/p][/quote]As I've said in the past, Billy, you seem to think every reply is some sort of attempt to provoke you. I must say, conversations with you in real life must be rather dull if this is how you react. All your friends and family must be creeping around you on conversational eggshells, lest you accuse them of attacking you all the time. Why is it, every time someone responds to your posts, you find it necessary to reply with a billion paragraphs on why they're such a terrible person? Did it ever occur to you to just reply to the post? Give it a go.[/p][/quote]Your post, as I expected, is nothing but provocative fiction.[/p][/quote]*sigh* tragic, really. Georgem
  • Score: 0

3:17pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

BillyTheKid wrote:
Georgem wrote:
Billy, if you think pulling the "poor victim" card out for the eight-hundredth time is going to allow you to troll and insult people with impunity, think again. You might have said you were going to ignore Evil GeorgeM(tm)'s posts, but you've said that before, and failed. Your ego won't allow you to stop trying to treat everyone like your former pupils.
Ya-da ya-da ya-da............evi

l george, former pupils, ego.........ya-da, ya-da, ya-da.......
Now you're getting the idea! Just shrug it off! Ditch the old "Poor Billy, victim" act! It was a bit pathetic, and nobody was buying it anyway.

I'll just remind you, you actually admitted to troll-like behaviour in your most recent faux truce. Just sayin'
[quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: Billy, if you think pulling the "poor victim" card out for the eight-hundredth time is going to allow you to troll and insult people with impunity, think again. You might have said you were going to ignore Evil GeorgeM(tm)'s posts, but you've said that before, and failed. Your ego won't allow you to stop trying to treat everyone like your former pupils.[/p][/quote]Ya-da ya-da ya-da............evi l george, former pupils, ego.........ya-da, ya-da, ya-da.......[/p][/quote]Now you're getting the idea! Just shrug it off! Ditch the old "Poor Billy, victim" act! It was a bit pathetic, and nobody was buying it anyway. I'll just remind you, you actually admitted to troll-like behaviour in your most recent faux truce. Just sayin' Georgem
  • Score: 0

3:48pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

BillyTheKid wrote:
I say, I say, I say. How do you get half a ton of sh** into something the size of a small football ?

Dunno.

Ask Georgem. He's managed it with his head !

Before you report this, remember I have archived what you have just said to provoke it !
Archive whatever you want, Billy, creepy though it may be. Make sure you archive your own posts as well. I know you think you're beyond reproach, and that your endless diatribes qualify as some Hannibal Lecter-type insight into the mind of Evil Georgem(tm), but they are, in fact, designed exactly to inflame another user. Pretty much a troll, by definition.
[quote][p][bold]BillyTheKid[/bold] wrote: I say, I say, I say. How do you get half a ton of sh** into something the size of a small football ? Dunno. Ask Georgem. He's managed it with his head ! Before you report this, remember I have archived what you have just said to provoke it ![/p][/quote]Archive whatever you want, Billy, creepy though it may be. Make sure you archive your own posts as well. I know you think you're beyond reproach, and that your endless diatribes qualify as some Hannibal Lecter-type insight into the mind of Evil Georgem(tm), but they are, in fact, designed exactly to inflame another user. Pretty much a troll, by definition. Georgem
  • Score: 0

3:51pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

Tune in every day forever, to see Billy pick fights with people, then complain that he's being 'victimised'.
Tune in every day forever, to see Billy pick fights with people, then complain that he's being 'victimised'. Georgem
  • Score: 0

4:30pm Wed 5 Sep 12

Georgem says...

Billy, at no point have you torn me to shreds. Seriously, give up. You and I see this entire set of incidents entirely differently.
Billy, at no point have you torn me to shreds. Seriously, give up. You and I see this entire set of incidents entirely differently. Georgem
  • Score: 0

6:44pm Wed 5 Sep 12

BillyTheKid says...

Georgem wrote:
Billy, at no point have you torn me to shreds. Seriously, give up. You and I see this entire set of incidents entirely differently.
The only reason you are commenting now is because I have fed you material to attack. When the material dries up, you'll dry up.
[quote][p][bold]Georgem[/bold] wrote: Billy, at no point have you torn me to shreds. Seriously, give up. You and I see this entire set of incidents entirely differently.[/p][/quote]The only reason you are commenting now is because I have fed you material to attack. When the material dries up, you'll dry up. BillyTheKid
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree