Puncheon: I want to stay a Saint

Jason Puncheon at Stamford Bridge last night.

Jason Puncheon at Stamford Bridge last night.

First published in Sport Daily Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Senior Sports Reporter

Jason Puncheon revealed after last night’s Stamford Bridge heroics that he hopes to sign a new contract at Saints.

The winger completed a remarkable comeback against Chelsea, lashing a late volley into the top corner to earn Nigel Adkins’ men a 2-2 draw away to the European champions.

Puncheon has now scored five times this season and has established himself as a key component in the Saints side.

The 26-year-old is out of contract this summer, however, with a new deal yet to be signed.

But Puncheon declared last night that he wants to be back at Saints next season.

“I’m hoping to be, I’m happy here, and that’s the most important thing,” he said.

Puncheon would not disclose whether negotiations had begun, adding: “I can just say that I’m happy here and that’s all I can say, and what will be dealt with will be dealt with internally.”

Given his form this season, it would certainly be a surprise if Saints did not want him back.

Puncheon, who said he is “absolutely buzzing” with the way his campaign is panning out, capped the latest in a string of fine performances last night with a spectacular goal.

Since being welcomed back into the Saints fold a year ago, following the end of a rocky relationship with the club’s hierarchy, the midfielder has emerged as a potent attacking threat.

Related links

He admits that is something he has worked hard on to improve.

“I get in the positions to score, and I always knew I needed to prove it, and obviously to get to the next level – and this is the Premier League – you’ve got to do that and that’s what I’m doing now,” he said.

Speaking of his goal at Chelsea, he added: “The ball bounced up and I thought keep it in the air and just hit it on the volley and I’ve done that and it’s gone in.”

Puncheon felt Saints deserved the draw and showed strong character to fight back from their half-time deficit.

“It was great to get the point, especially being 2-0 down at half-time and that’s what we’ve got from it,” he said.

“It was harsh (to be 2-0 down at the break), especially two quick goals like that, but the main thing is we got something from the game.

“I felt we were confident and we took that into the second half and obviously got the point.”

Comments (267)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:12am Thu 17 Jan 13

christian-saint says...

Well done Punch, you are bossing it this season!! Right wing superstar!
Well done Punch, you are bossing it this season!! Right wing superstar! christian-saint
  • Score: 0

6:34am Thu 17 Jan 13

Norwegian Saint says...

What a turn around, about 12 months ago he was booed coming on the pitch, now he is one of the first names on the team sheet with a few man-of-the-match games.
Sign the lad up, we have a young brilliant team... Proud to be a Saint!
What a turn around, about 12 months ago he was booed coming on the pitch, now he is one of the first names on the team sheet with a few man-of-the-match games. Sign the lad up, we have a young brilliant team... Proud to be a Saint! Norwegian Saint
  • Score: 0

6:42am Thu 17 Jan 13

City Saint says...

Well done Jason, and the whole team, on a superb result last night.

And good on Punch for showing that with hard work, and a willingness to man up, anyone in the club can straighten their halo and become a top Saint.
Well done Jason, and the whole team, on a superb result last night. And good on Punch for showing that with hard work, and a willingness to man up, anyone in the club can straighten their halo and become a top Saint. City Saint
  • Score: 0

6:52am Thu 17 Jan 13

Sally Hamilton Original says...

My player of the season, we have to give him a new deal and soon, he deserves it!
My player of the season, we have to give him a new deal and soon, he deserves it! Sally Hamilton Original
  • Score: 0

7:14am Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

Well done Nigel and the lads. Adkins got the tactics just right. And bringing Rickie on was genius. He had the pace to cause Chelsea problems. COYR
Well done Nigel and the lads. Adkins got the tactics just right. And bringing Rickie on was genius. He had the pace to cause Chelsea problems. COYR since 1885
  • Score: 0

7:40am Thu 17 Jan 13

St.David says...

Get him signed now. He has been our stand out player since pre season. Great goal last night. Coyrs....
Get him signed now. He has been our stand out player since pre season. Great goal last night. Coyrs.... St.David
  • Score: 0

7:41am Thu 17 Jan 13

Puddletown Saint says...

Surely SRL and Punch must be considered for the next England squad. Would have Luke in there as well as he was streets ahead of Cole last night. Corky cannot be far off much better than Cleverly and Nath is 10 times the player of Johnson. Ada is already there.

Fantastic result last night COYR
Surely SRL and Punch must be considered for the next England squad. Would have Luke in there as well as he was streets ahead of Cole last night. Corky cannot be far off much better than Cleverly and Nath is 10 times the player of Johnson. Ada is already there. Fantastic result last night COYR Puddletown Saint
  • Score: 0

7:49am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

7:50am Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintinCanada says...

I think that him remaining with us will enhance his chances of a England cap sometime soon.
I think that him remaining with us will enhance his chances of a England cap sometime soon. SaintinCanada
  • Score: 0

7:57am Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintinCanada says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
Not sure what drugs you are on, but you should try some other stuff.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]Not sure what drugs you are on, but you should try some other stuff. SaintinCanada
  • Score: 0

8:19am Thu 17 Jan 13

saintmicky says...

Lets just get that signature on the piece of paper! Well done Punch
Lets just get that signature on the piece of paper! Well done Punch saintmicky
  • Score: 0

8:38am Thu 17 Jan 13

Ganja Jungle says...

Sign him up please.
Sign him up please. Ganja Jungle
  • Score: 0

8:39am Thu 17 Jan 13

insane saint says...

are we sure we want him?
are we sure we want him? insane saint
  • Score: 0

9:01am Thu 17 Jan 13

shaun_inuk says...

Considering Luke Shaw even says that punch is the guy who has taken him under his wing then he's obviously a changed man and deserves at least another year.

Sign him up
Considering Luke Shaw even says that punch is the guy who has taken him under his wing then he's obviously a changed man and deserves at least another year. Sign him up shaun_inuk
  • Score: 0

9:02am Thu 17 Jan 13

City Saint says...

The best thing about Pucheon's comments is that he is talking as though he is so sure that we are staying up that it's not even an issue.

That kind of confidence in the squad will help us keep climbing the table. There's no reason we can't match Wet Spam in this league.
The best thing about Pucheon's comments is that he is talking as though he is so sure that we are staying up that it's not even an issue. That kind of confidence in the squad will help us keep climbing the table. There's no reason we can't match Wet Spam in this league. City Saint
  • Score: 0

9:04am Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Excellent news!
Excellent news! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:05am Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

14
14 Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:11am Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
As Velleity posted:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27.

Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]As Velleity posted: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27. Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:12am Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

I was so doubtful about him this season, but hands up, I was wrong, been superb, and deserves a decent deal.
I was so doubtful about him this season, but hands up, I was wrong, been superb, and deserves a decent deal. Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

9:20am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
As Velleity posted:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27.

Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE!
Brilliant deduction! The jig is up for me, and there I was thinking I had fooled you. Nothing gets by you and Valerie.

What's is funny is that out of nowhere all of the Stepford wives materialised within a few minutes of each other, mid game. Seems to occur all to frequently.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]As Velleity posted: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27. Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE![/p][/quote]Brilliant deduction! The jig is up for me, and there I was thinking I had fooled you. Nothing gets by you and Valerie. What's is funny is that out of nowhere all of the Stepford wives materialised within a few minutes of each other, mid game. Seems to occur all to frequently. Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

9:20am Thu 17 Jan 13

Alicesdad says...

It says a lot for Cortese that Punch is still here. Maximum respect !
I hope he gets signed up.

Gradually we are inching up the table, a point at a time but it's progress and we are now in sight of a mid table position.

It's a tough month ahead as we have the returns against Man Utd/Man City.
I doubt they are looking forward to playing us much. But if we can get points off them we should be well set to make sure we finish well above the drop zone.
It says a lot for Cortese that Punch is still here. Maximum respect ! I hope he gets signed up. Gradually we are inching up the table, a point at a time but it's progress and we are now in sight of a mid table position. It's a tough month ahead as we have the returns against Man Utd/Man City. I doubt they are looking forward to playing us much. But if we can get points off them we should be well set to make sure we finish well above the drop zone. Alicesdad
  • Score: 0

9:21am Thu 17 Jan 13

St Retford says...

There's only one word for his goal last night, and that's "Le-Tissier-esque".

It was GLORIOUS.

Funny how things turn around for some people, isn't it?
There's only one word for his goal last night, and that's "Le-Tissier-esque". It was GLORIOUS. Funny how things turn around for some people, isn't it? St Retford
  • Score: 0

9:22am Thu 17 Jan 13

JohnItaly says...

Punch has to be applauded for the way he has handled himself following his reconciliation with the club and NC. Clearly he has "buckled down" and conducted himself with a very positive attitude. This needs to be rewarded with a new contract which in itself would be a perfect example of the club's approach those players who are prepared to put the effort in for the club.
Punch has to be applauded for the way he has handled himself following his reconciliation with the club and NC. Clearly he has "buckled down" and conducted himself with a very positive attitude. This needs to be rewarded with a new contract which in itself would be a perfect example of the club's approach those players who are prepared to put the effort in for the club. JohnItaly
  • Score: 0

9:25am Thu 17 Jan 13

St Retford says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
As Velleity posted:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27.

Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE!
Brilliant deduction! The jig is up for me, and there I was thinking I had fooled you. Nothing gets by you and Valerie.

What's is funny is that out of nowhere all of the Stepford wives materialised within a few minutes of each other, mid game. Seems to occur all to frequently.
That might be because the "stepford wives" represent the viewpoint of the majority, who tend to get annoyed when trolls like you come on here and start posting utter bul1shit to get a reaction. It's not that they're the same person; it's just that there are a lot of people who think like they do.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]As Velleity posted: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27. Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE![/p][/quote]Brilliant deduction! The jig is up for me, and there I was thinking I had fooled you. Nothing gets by you and Valerie. What's is funny is that out of nowhere all of the Stepford wives materialised within a few minutes of each other, mid game. Seems to occur all to frequently.[/p][/quote]That might be because the "stepford wives" represent the viewpoint of the majority, who tend to get annoyed when trolls like you come on here and start posting utter bul1shit to get a reaction. It's not that they're the same person; it's just that there are a lot of people who think like they do. St Retford
  • Score: 0

9:27am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
As Velleity posted:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27.

Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE!
Hey don't forget, I'm not just sainty soul, I'm also Kent, Andy, Soton Dominatrix, blue and white and a whole list of other people who mug you off on a regular basis. Nice work Sherlock! Oh sorry, I forgot you, investigate with Valerie. Ok, nice work Dempsey and Makepeace!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]As Velleity posted: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27. Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE![/p][/quote]Hey don't forget, I'm not just sainty soul, I'm also Kent, Andy, Soton Dominatrix, blue and white and a whole list of other people who mug you off on a regular basis. Nice work Sherlock! Oh sorry, I forgot you, investigate with Valerie. Ok, nice work Dempsey and Makepeace! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

9:30am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

St Retford wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
As Velleity posted:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27.

Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE!
Brilliant deduction! The jig is up for me, and there I was thinking I had fooled you. Nothing gets by you and Valerie.

What's is funny is that out of nowhere all of the Stepford wives materialised within a few minutes of each other, mid game. Seems to occur all to frequently.
That might be because the "stepford wives" represent the viewpoint of the majority, who tend to get annoyed when trolls like you come on here and start posting utter bul1shit to get a reaction. It's not that they're the same person; it's just that there are a lot of people who think like they do.
Point taken Seed, I mean Retty! Opps!
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]As Velleity posted: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls Velleity "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. What gives it away is that whilst it's normal for skunts to round on each other he doesn't realise we don't do that this end of the M27. Well done last night Nigel, players and fans. TOGETHER AS ONE![/p][/quote]Brilliant deduction! The jig is up for me, and there I was thinking I had fooled you. Nothing gets by you and Valerie. What's is funny is that out of nowhere all of the Stepford wives materialised within a few minutes of each other, mid game. Seems to occur all to frequently.[/p][/quote]That might be because the "stepford wives" represent the viewpoint of the majority, who tend to get annoyed when trolls like you come on here and start posting utter bul1shit to get a reaction. It's not that they're the same person; it's just that there are a lot of people who think like they do.[/p][/quote]Point taken Seed, I mean Retty! Opps! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

9:32am Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Can you hear them
They talk about us
Telling lies
Well that's no surprise

Can you see them
See right through them
They have no shield
No secrets to reveal

It doesn't matter what they say
In the jealous games skunts play
Our future’s sealed

Careless talk
Through paper sites
We can't stop them
Only laugh at them

Spreading rumors
So far from true
Dragged up from the seaworld
Just like some precious pearl

It doesn't matter what they say
In the jealous games skunts play
Our future’s sealed
Pay no mind to what they say
It doesn't matter anyway
Our future’s sealed

There's a weapon
We must use
In our defense
Silence

When you look at them
Look right through them
That's when they'll disappear
That's when you'll be feared

Hush, my darling
Don't you cry
Quiet, angel
Forget their lies
Can you hear them They talk about us Telling lies Well that's no surprise Can you see them See right through them They have no shield No secrets to reveal It doesn't matter what they say In the jealous games skunts play Our future’s sealed Careless talk Through paper sites We can't stop them Only laugh at them Spreading rumors So far from true Dragged up from the seaworld Just like some precious pearl It doesn't matter what they say In the jealous games skunts play Our future’s sealed Pay no mind to what they say It doesn't matter anyway Our future’s sealed There's a weapon We must use In our defense Silence When you look at them Look right through them That's when they'll disappear That's when you'll be feared Hush, my darling Don't you cry Quiet, angel Forget their lies Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:33am Thu 17 Jan 13

mbetts says...

Since he's had his heart to heart with NA & NC he's pulled his finger out, stopped stropping and slowly but surely got better and better with every game and won around the fans at the same time.

Definitely an important part of the team, although he's obviously very one footed he can produce moments of brilliance at the highest level and we'd need to spend £5m+ to find an adequate replacement.
Since he's had his heart to heart with NA & NC he's pulled his finger out, stopped stropping and slowly but surely got better and better with every game and won around the fans at the same time. Definitely an important part of the team, although he's obviously very one footed he can produce moments of brilliance at the highest level and we'd need to spend £5m+ to find an adequate replacement. mbetts
  • Score: 0

9:34am Thu 17 Jan 13

mushrooms says...

If he had a right foot he'd be the best player in the world.
If he had a right foot he'd be the best player in the world. mushrooms
  • Score: 0

9:35am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Can you hear them
They talk about us
Telling lies
Well that's no surprise

Can you see them
See right through them
They have no shield
No secrets to reveal

It doesn't matter what they say
In the jealous games skunts play
Our future’s sealed

Careless talk
Through paper sites
We can't stop them
Only laugh at them

Spreading rumors
So far from true
Dragged up from the seaworld
Just like some precious pearl

It doesn't matter what they say
In the jealous games skunts play
Our future’s sealed
Pay no mind to what they say
It doesn't matter anyway
Our future’s sealed

There's a weapon
We must use
In our defense
Silence

When you look at them
Look right through them
That's when they'll disappear
That's when you'll be feared

Hush, my darling
Don't you cry
Quiet, angel
Forget their lies
Seed, you're not making much headway, quick, log in Mush down under! Btw, nice song!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Can you hear them They talk about us Telling lies Well that's no surprise Can you see them See right through them They have no shield No secrets to reveal It doesn't matter what they say In the jealous games skunts play Our future’s sealed Careless talk Through paper sites We can't stop them Only laugh at them Spreading rumors So far from true Dragged up from the seaworld Just like some precious pearl It doesn't matter what they say In the jealous games skunts play Our future’s sealed Pay no mind to what they say It doesn't matter anyway Our future’s sealed There's a weapon We must use In our defense Silence When you look at them Look right through them That's when they'll disappear That's when you'll be feared Hush, my darling Don't you cry Quiet, angel Forget their lies[/p][/quote]Seed, you're not making much headway, quick, log in Mush down under! Btw, nice song! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

9:47am Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense. warrens 76
  • Score: 0

9:56am Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait. Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

9:58am Thu 17 Jan 13

billythesaint says...

I dunno who has been his shooting coach but they need a raise! He used the hit the church behind the Chapel end, now he hits the back of the net. I almost dislocated my hip and knocked out my girlfriend when he scored last night. Sign him up pronto!
I dunno who has been his shooting coach but they need a raise! He used the hit the church behind the Chapel end, now he hits the back of the net. I almost dislocated my hip and knocked out my girlfriend when he scored last night. Sign him up pronto! billythesaint
  • Score: 0

10:24am Thu 17 Jan 13

milton road says...

impressed. Only the third time in 90 home games a team has come back from 2-0 down against Chelsea.
The confidence boost that must give the side is great especially after the cup tie. That was against the European champions.
COYR
impressed. Only the third time in 90 home games a team has come back from 2-0 down against Chelsea. The confidence boost that must give the side is great especially after the cup tie. That was against the European champions. COYR milton road
  • Score: 0

10:30am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind?

I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.[/p][/quote]I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind? I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright. Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

10:31am Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintMax says...

mbetts wrote:
Since he's had his heart to heart with NA & NC he's pulled his finger out, stopped stropping and slowly but surely got better and better with every game and won around the fans at the same time.

Definitely an important part of the team, although he's obviously very one footed he can produce moments of brilliance at the highest level and we'd need to spend £5m+ to find an adequate replacement.
Agree with you mbetts.
It was almost like he used to think the team should revolve around him and if it didnt he would sulk.. All respect to him for turning himself around and becoming a team member.
I also think he has found his sweet spot with us - if he went elsewhere he may struggle.. surely every leftback knows he will cut in on his left foot?
Tie him into a contract pronto
[quote][p][bold]mbetts[/bold] wrote: Since he's had his heart to heart with NA & NC he's pulled his finger out, stopped stropping and slowly but surely got better and better with every game and won around the fans at the same time. Definitely an important part of the team, although he's obviously very one footed he can produce moments of brilliance at the highest level and we'd need to spend £5m+ to find an adequate replacement.[/p][/quote]Agree with you mbetts. It was almost like he used to think the team should revolve around him and if it didnt he would sulk.. All respect to him for turning himself around and becoming a team member. I also think he has found his sweet spot with us - if he went elsewhere he may struggle.. surely every leftback knows he will cut in on his left foot? Tie him into a contract pronto SaintMax
  • Score: 0

10:31am Thu 17 Jan 13

Tirau Dan says...

I listened to Punch with radio solent in the after match interview.. when asked about a contract renewal I'm pretty sure he said "I can't talk about that, all I can say is I'm happy here." I thought that was really mature and sensible..
I had just tweeted to Luke Shaw a congrats when a chelsea fan jumped on him and called him names.. Luke tweeted "Get a tissue" hahaha good man,
Both our full backs were excellent and have had lots of congrats but lets give a firm pat on the back to Yoshi and Jos.. Jos gives me nerves sometimes but he was rock solid and hoofed it out of the danger area well and did a couple of decent short passes too. Tons of effort and commitment going in from all our lads at the mo.. credit to fans, club and owners.
I listened to Punch with radio solent in the after match interview.. when asked about a contract renewal I'm pretty sure he said "I can't talk about that, all I can say is I'm happy here." I thought that was really mature and sensible.. I had just tweeted to Luke Shaw a congrats when a chelsea fan jumped on him and called him names.. Luke tweeted "Get a tissue" hahaha good man, Both our full backs were excellent and have had lots of congrats but lets give a firm pat on the back to Yoshi and Jos.. Jos gives me nerves sometimes but he was rock solid and hoofed it out of the danger area well and did a couple of decent short passes too. Tons of effort and commitment going in from all our lads at the mo.. credit to fans, club and owners. Tirau Dan
  • Score: 0

10:35am Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintMax says...

billythesaint wrote:
I dunno who has been his shooting coach but they need a raise! He used the hit the church behind the Chapel end, now he hits the back of the net. I almost dislocated my hip and knocked out my girlfriend when he scored last night. Sign him up pronto!
great LOL. could have been worse, you could have dislocated your girlfriend and knocked out your hip!
[quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: I dunno who has been his shooting coach but they need a raise! He used the hit the church behind the Chapel end, now he hits the back of the net. I almost dislocated my hip and knocked out my girlfriend when he scored last night. Sign him up pronto![/p][/quote]great LOL. could have been worse, you could have dislocated your girlfriend and knocked out your hip! SaintMax
  • Score: 0

10:37am Thu 17 Jan 13

batesieboy says...

Taunton Saint wrote:
I was so doubtful about him this season, but hands up, I was wrong, been superb, and deserves a decent deal.
You weren't wrong. Puncheon was getting shown the door, quite rightly.No-one wanted him though, so he was allowed back in thanks to a forgiving Cortese, Adkins and Reed. That he applied himself in the right way and has improved so much means he is a different player and person now. So I repeat, you were not wrong at all. Punch was, and he's put it right. So well done to him, and everyone else who had a hand in the metamorphosis.
[quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: I was so doubtful about him this season, but hands up, I was wrong, been superb, and deserves a decent deal.[/p][/quote]You weren't wrong. Puncheon was getting shown the door, quite rightly.No-one wanted him though, so he was allowed back in thanks to a forgiving Cortese, Adkins and Reed. That he applied himself in the right way and has improved so much means he is a different player and person now. So I repeat, you were not wrong at all. Punch was, and he's put it right. So well done to him, and everyone else who had a hand in the metamorphosis. batesieboy
  • Score: 0

10:39am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
[quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

10:45am Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind?

I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.
Too many years of counting chickens before and all that means I will not call relegation or not..

What I will say is if we start pulling results of the big boys we will stay up..everyone who as ever stayed up usually does it by winning a collection of unlikely matches..
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.[/p][/quote]I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind? I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.[/p][/quote]Too many years of counting chickens before and all that means I will not call relegation or not.. What I will say is if we start pulling results of the big boys we will stay up..everyone who as ever stayed up usually does it by winning a collection of unlikely matches.. warrens 76
  • Score: 0

10:48am Thu 17 Jan 13

Beer Monster says...

Punch is the epitome of how far we've come in the last three years, and it's been through the nouse of the management team that we've been able to achieve it.

Keep the faith

COYR
Punch is the epitome of how far we've come in the last three years, and it's been through the nouse of the management team that we've been able to achieve it. Keep the faith COYR Beer Monster
  • Score: 0

10:48am Thu 17 Jan 13

st1halo says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
Agree about Guly he hasn't done anything to convince me about his ability despite many on here defend him.
Great result last night. Nigel used his head and packed the midfield as this is where it was lost last time around.
My only gripe (again - the same one for most games) is we MUST learn to retain the ball and slow the game down sometimes instead of panicking. Once we were on level terms we kept hoofing it away, giving it back and inviting pressure. Control of the game is something Nigel talks much about and not only will it mean we can see games out but it will save the strain on my sphincter!!
I can bend coins with it now!!


STID
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.[/p][/quote]Agree about Guly he hasn't done anything to convince me about his ability despite many on here defend him. Great result last night. Nigel used his head and packed the midfield as this is where it was lost last time around. My only gripe (again - the same one for most games) is we MUST learn to retain the ball and slow the game down sometimes instead of panicking. Once we were on level terms we kept hoofing it away, giving it back and inviting pressure. Control of the game is something Nigel talks much about and not only will it mean we can see games out but it will save the strain on my sphincter!! I can bend coins with it now!! STID st1halo
  • Score: 0

10:54am Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintMax says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind?

I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.
Too many years of counting chickens before and all that means I will not call relegation or not..

What I will say is if we start pulling results of the big boys we will stay up..everyone who as ever stayed up usually does it by winning a collection of unlikely matches..
I think NA learnt from the Arsenal game (the recent one), to smother their creative fluid midfield, get up to half time with minimal damage, begin to worry the home fans and then bring on the big guns.
Though I think even he would be honest and say to come back from 2 - 0 was a pleasant suprise.
The game also highlighted that Rodriguez is currently not an option - will be, but we cant afford him at the moment.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.[/p][/quote]I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind? I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.[/p][/quote]Too many years of counting chickens before and all that means I will not call relegation or not.. What I will say is if we start pulling results of the big boys we will stay up..everyone who as ever stayed up usually does it by winning a collection of unlikely matches..[/p][/quote]I think NA learnt from the Arsenal game (the recent one), to smother their creative fluid midfield, get up to half time with minimal damage, begin to worry the home fans and then bring on the big guns. Though I think even he would be honest and say to come back from 2 - 0 was a pleasant suprise. The game also highlighted that Rodriguez is currently not an option - will be, but we cant afford him at the moment. SaintMax
  • Score: 0

10:55am Thu 17 Jan 13

up saints says...

well i think like most team selection was wrong last nght.2 nil down half time thought mite as well save lambo and ramirez for the everton game nice to be proved wrong.i thought guly as poor and chappers did not do alot when he came on but just my opinion.still think we need a keeper in the transfere window but if nigel thinks he is the best we have keep to him in no rotation again. get punch on board asap
well i think like most team selection was wrong last nght.2 nil down half time thought mite as well save lambo and ramirez for the everton game nice to be proved wrong.i thought guly as poor and chappers did not do alot when he came on but just my opinion.still think we need a keeper in the transfere window but if nigel thinks he is the best we have keep to him in no rotation again. get punch on board asap up saints
  • Score: 0

11:06am Thu 17 Jan 13

Crispinmumbles says...

Well spank my with celery and call me Sigue Sigue Sputnik! I wasn't expecting a point from this one, nice one lads
Well spank my with celery and call me Sigue Sigue Sputnik! I wasn't expecting a point from this one, nice one lads Crispinmumbles
  • Score: 0

11:08am Thu 17 Jan 13

hedge end bob says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind?

I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.
You ust be joking when you say , i cant see us going down.LOL your team have just lost players got no money to replace them and will be in the 4th division if they still exist next season.
HAVN'T seen Five trophys between us...... on here? , maybe he has had a ban imposed on him???

GREAT RESULT, hope the fans returned the chant to the Chelsea fans...... you've had your day out NOW FCUK OFF.

Like wise BBB.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.[/p][/quote]I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind? I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.[/p][/quote]You ust be joking when you say , i cant see us going down.LOL your team have just lost players got no money to replace them and will be in the 4th division if they still exist next season. HAVN'T seen Five trophys between us...... on here? , maybe he has had a ban imposed on him??? GREAT RESULT, hope the fans returned the chant to the Chelsea fans...... you've had your day out NOW FCUK OFF. Like wise BBB. hedge end bob
  • Score: 0

11:15am Thu 17 Jan 13

business-guru says...

Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.
Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does. business-guru
  • Score: 0

11:15am Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
BBB

I'll be fair, if you were debating, then fine, I was at work so wasnt here.

But you go on to state .....

"And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun"

Really? seen you get quite personal a number of times

Sorry mate, hung by your own Petard
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]BBB I'll be fair, if you were debating, then fine, I was at work so wasnt here. But you go on to state ..... "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun" Really? seen you get quite personal a number of times Sorry mate, hung by your own Petard Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

11:15am Thu 17 Jan 13

willygetaway says...

Pucheon,is in the zone right now he,s earned every bit of a new contract (snatch his hand off Nigel)
Pucheon,is in the zone right now he,s earned every bit of a new contract (snatch his hand off Nigel) willygetaway
  • Score: 0

11:27am Thu 17 Jan 13

Nemesisaint says...

Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.
Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster. Nemesisaint
  • Score: 0

11:31am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

hedge end bob wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
In hindsight we can say that NA got it right...

The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared.

....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful...

Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over

2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant...

...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them....

Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now...

We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.
I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind?

I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.
You ust be joking when you say , i cant see us going down.LOL your team have just lost players got no money to replace them and will be in the 4th division if they still exist next season.
HAVN'T seen Five trophys between us...... on here? , maybe he has had a ban imposed on him???

GREAT RESULT, hope the fans returned the chant to the Chelsea fans...... you've had your day out NOW FCUK OFF.

Like wise BBB.
LOL, you pleb!
[quote][p][bold]hedge end bob[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]In hindsight we can say that NA got it right... The failure in the first half was FEAR for some reason even when confronted with clear attacking opportunities we were to scared. ....as for Guly's usefulness well t!tis on a bull are more useful... Davis...I have rarely seen a more hopeless nothing effort...head over the ball and smash it straight ahead, mind not working quick enough...moan over 2nd half..Southampton team turned up and it was not luck either...firstly how many people noticed an increase in tempo that a lot of us have been screaming for, speed was apparant... ...moreover bringing our best players on when Chelski could no longer run us ragged was inspired and Chelski found themselves playing against a team that could pass as good and finish as good as them.... Beating Everton will and needs to be the next step...we have to get scalps of the top ten now... We are getting better at dealing with pressure but play a better game when we are not under it...indeed the further we get away from the relegation zone the further we will get away from the relegation zone..if that makes sense.[/p][/quote]I see that keeping Rickie rested, and then bringing him on, meant he made a greater impact. Don't you think that maybe, if him and Gaston had started , we might not have fallen two behind? I can't see us going down, can you? There's a lot of quality in the team and with a few wise purchases, we should be alright.[/p][/quote]You ust be joking when you say , i cant see us going down.LOL your team have just lost players got no money to replace them and will be in the 4th division if they still exist next season. HAVN'T seen Five trophys between us...... on here? , maybe he has had a ban imposed on him??? GREAT RESULT, hope the fans returned the chant to the Chelsea fans...... you've had your day out NOW FCUK OFF. Like wise BBB.[/p][/quote]LOL, you pleb! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

11:32am Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

business-guru wrote:
Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.
A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well..

Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions..

...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal..

His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad.

You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game..

The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..
[quote][p][bold]business-guru[/bold] wrote: Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.[/p][/quote]A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well.. Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions.. ...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal.. His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad. You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game.. The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl.. warrens 76
  • Score: 0

11:33am Thu 17 Jan 13

Cheapshot says...

Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover!

A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract.

COYR!!
Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover! A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract. COYR!! Cheapshot
  • Score: 0

11:46am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing!
The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

11:48am Thu 17 Jan 13

Cheapshot says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing!
Sssssssssssssshhhhhh
hhhhh!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing![/p][/quote]Sssssssssssssshhhhhh hhhhh! Cheapshot
  • Score: 0

11:54am Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Nemesisaint wrote:
Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.
Ramblings! Do you read what people post? I suppose they're all Oscar Wildes or Christopher Hitchens. Brilliant!
[quote][p][bold]Nemesisaint[/bold] wrote: Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.[/p][/quote]Ramblings! Do you read what people post? I suppose they're all Oscar Wildes or Christopher Hitchens. Brilliant! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

11:55am Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

Cheapshot wrote:
Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover!

A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract.

COYR!!
I take it you are of the fairer sex?
[quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover! A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract. COYR!![/p][/quote]I take it you are of the fairer sex? warrens 76
  • Score: 0

12:02pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Cheapshot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing!
Sssssssssssssshhhhhh

hhhhh!
Sssssssssshhhhhhhh, well I never! Look, I can’t devote the kind of time some of you fellas do, someone’s got to work to provide the benefits you all claim, but I like to dabble in a bit of thread. So shoot me! Occasionally, BBB needs his court jesters to amuse him. Up the saints!
[quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing![/p][/quote]Sssssssssssssshhhhhh hhhhh![/p][/quote]Sssssssssshhhhhhhh, well I never! Look, I can’t devote the kind of time some of you fellas do, someone’s got to work to provide the benefits you all claim, but I like to dabble in a bit of thread. So shoot me! Occasionally, BBB needs his court jesters to amuse him. Up the saints! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

12:06pm Thu 17 Jan 13

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Cheapshot wrote:
Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover!

A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract.

COYR!!
I take it you are of the fairer sex?
Ahhhh Lord Stoneham, you alone on a a football forum.
ARE THEY MAD ?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover! A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract. COYR!![/p][/quote]I take it you are of the fairer sex?[/p][/quote]Ahhhh Lord Stoneham, you alone on a a football forum. ARE THEY MAD ? willygetaway
  • Score: 0

12:09pm Thu 17 Jan 13

likewatchingbrazil says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Nemesisaint wrote:
Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.
Ramblings! Do you read what people post? I suppose they're all Oscar Wildes or Christopher Hitchens. Brilliant!
on a serious note, hows your club doing,
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Nemesisaint[/bold] wrote: Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.[/p][/quote]Ramblings! Do you read what people post? I suppose they're all Oscar Wildes or Christopher Hitchens. Brilliant![/p][/quote]on a serious note, hows your club doing, likewatchingbrazil
  • Score: 0

12:13pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Cheapshot says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Cheapshot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing!
Sssssssssssssshhhhhh


hhhhh!
Sssssssssshhhhhhhh, well I never! Look, I can’t devote the kind of time some of you fellas do, someone’s got to work to provide the benefits you all claim, but I like to dabble in a bit of thread. So shoot me! Occasionally, BBB needs his court jesters to amuse him. Up the saints!
Sssssssssssshhhhhhhh
hhhhh!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing![/p][/quote]Sssssssssssssshhhhhh hhhhh![/p][/quote]Sssssssssshhhhhhhh, well I never! Look, I can’t devote the kind of time some of you fellas do, someone’s got to work to provide the benefits you all claim, but I like to dabble in a bit of thread. So shoot me! Occasionally, BBB needs his court jesters to amuse him. Up the saints![/p][/quote]Sssssssssssshhhhhhhh hhhhh! Cheapshot
  • Score: 0

12:14pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Cheapshot says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Cheapshot wrote:
Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover!

A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract.

COYR!!
I take it you are of the fairer sex?
No
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover! A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract. COYR!![/p][/quote]I take it you are of the fairer sex?[/p][/quote]No Cheapshot
  • Score: 0

12:19pm Thu 17 Jan 13

likewatchingbrazil says...

likewatchingbrazil wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Nemesisaint wrote:
Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.
Ramblings! Do you read what people post? I suppose they're all Oscar Wildes or Christopher Hitchens. Brilliant!
on a serious note, hows your club doing,
no answer was the loud reply as he dropped his glass eye and waved his wooden leg
[quote][p][bold]likewatchingbrazil[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Nemesisaint[/bold] wrote: Bring back Branfoot says "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun." What you have said there is just about as wrong as it could be, sadly you are not honest, you have been personal, even in the post that the quote came from. The only one that appears to think you are funny? = yourself. Last nights game was a joy to follow on the match thread only spoilt by the imature ramblings of one poster.[/p][/quote]Ramblings! Do you read what people post? I suppose they're all Oscar Wildes or Christopher Hitchens. Brilliant![/p][/quote]on a serious note, hows your club doing,[/p][/quote]no answer was the loud reply as he dropped his glass eye and waved his wooden leg likewatchingbrazil
  • Score: 0

12:30pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing!
So then mate, once more into the fore

You don't get Personal - hmmmm

Really?

As usual someone finds you out (not difficult), and you start to throw insults around instead of acceptig a rational argument

I will now ignore you, beneath me. Goodbye - see you on one of your other Users
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: The kangaroo court is session. I've never seen a chimp hold a gavel, impressive! Truth is, some of you are seething because you like to dish it out, but when someone comes along and makes you look like a first class prat, you start blubbing![/p][/quote]So then mate, once more into the fore You don't get Personal - hmmmm Really? As usual someone finds you out (not difficult), and you start to throw insults around instead of acceptig a rational argument I will now ignore you, beneath me. Goodbye - see you on one of your other Users Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

12:32pm Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cheapshot wrote:
Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover!

A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract.

COYR!!
I take it you are of the fairer sex?
Ahhhh Lord Stoneham, you alone on a a football forum.
ARE THEY MAD ?
Yes, yes they are...what time did you get back?
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover! A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract. COYR!![/p][/quote]I take it you are of the fairer sex?[/p][/quote]Ahhhh Lord Stoneham, you alone on a a football forum. ARE THEY MAD ?[/p][/quote]Yes, yes they are...what time did you get back? warrens 76
  • Score: 0

12:34pm Thu 17 Jan 13

mack chinnon says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
Fcuk off you boring kunt.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]Fcuk off you boring kunt. mack chinnon
  • Score: 0

12:36pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

If you look at the successes of the last two seasons many games that were in the balance were won with impact substitutions. Nigel has not been able to do that this season because the bench is weak and more suited to covering for injuries than changing games. Last night he gave himself the power of Lambert and Gaston on the bench - awesome.

Another similarity between Rickie and Le Tiss is that neither are natural athletes despite being hugely gifted footballers. We fans must get used to the fact that when we play one up front it cannot be Rickie he does not have the pace or stammina for it - that is why we signed Jay Rod.
If you look at the successes of the last two seasons many games that were in the balance were won with impact substitutions. Nigel has not been able to do that this season because the bench is weak and more suited to covering for injuries than changing games. Last night he gave himself the power of Lambert and Gaston on the bench - awesome. Another similarity between Rickie and Le Tiss is that neither are natural athletes despite being hugely gifted footballers. We fans must get used to the fact that when we play one up front it cannot be Rickie he does not have the pace or stammina for it - that is why we signed Jay Rod. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

12:38pm Thu 17 Jan 13

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cheapshot wrote:
Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover!

A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract.

COYR!!
I take it you are of the fairer sex?
Ahhhh Lord Stoneham, you alone on a a football forum.
ARE THEY MAD ?
Yes, yes they are...what time did you get back?
about 00,30 we stopped for a tonsil soother
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cheapshot[/bold] wrote: Sky Sports are saying Dan Seaborne is on his way to the Cherries (silly name) on loan for the rest of the season...surely this must mean we have another CB coming in? Otherwise we have no cover! A little bit of wee came out when Punch scored last night, for that reason alone he's worthy of a new contract. COYR!![/p][/quote]I take it you are of the fairer sex?[/p][/quote]Ahhhh Lord Stoneham, you alone on a a football forum. ARE THEY MAD ?[/p][/quote]Yes, yes they are...what time did you get back?[/p][/quote]about 00,30 we stopped for a tonsil soother willygetaway
  • Score: 0

12:47pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintmac says...

All we want now is for Forren to sign then a very good week will become a brilliant week.
Have our Norwegian friends heard
anymore on Forren?
All we want now is for Forren to sign then a very good week will become a brilliant week. Have our Norwegian friends heard anymore on Forren? saintmac
  • Score: 0

12:51pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

mack chinnon wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
Fcuk off you boring kunt.
You too Seed, I mean mack chinnon, hilarious name!
[quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]Fcuk off you boring kunt.[/p][/quote]You too Seed, I mean mack chinnon, hilarious name! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

12:53pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Well one Jason great goal and performance yet again. Now get your agent to talk to the club and sort out a new 3 year contract asap.
If RVP had scored a quality goal like that the papers would have headlines about the wonder strike etc and not concentrate all their efforts on Chelsea's woes
COYR
Well one Jason great goal and performance yet again. Now get your agent to talk to the club and sort out a new 3 year contract asap. If RVP had scored a quality goal like that the papers would have headlines about the wonder strike etc and not concentrate all their efforts on Chelsea's woes COYR J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

12:59pm Thu 17 Jan 13

likewatchingbrazil says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
mack chinnon wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut.

Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it.

Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary!

Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula!
Fcuk off you boring kunt.
You too Seed, I mean mack chinnon, hilarious name!
hows your club doing?
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: I must say the match thread was going swimmingly last night, before the happy clapping thought police broke down the door and came goose stepping in, demanding to see our papers. Not nice guys, and on a match day! Tut tut. Anyway let's put the Disney Manson family to one side and talk turkey. Nigel was too negative in his team selection. If Gaston and Rickie had started, who knows, we could have won it. Nigel must purchase wisely in the window and must be positive in his team selection and tactics. Speed it up Nige. We have some quality players, when you let them be direct, they deliver! Now let's all get behind the team and put last nights unsavoury events behind us. I mean really, was deploying the French sleeping gas canister really necessary! Note for the wives, if you all start posting at exactly the same time, it's not difficult for us to suss that 10 of you, in reality, actually equals 2 or 3. It's commonly referred to, in mathematical circles, as the yokel formula![/p][/quote]Fcuk off you boring kunt.[/p][/quote]You too Seed, I mean mack chinnon, hilarious name![/p][/quote]hows your club doing? likewatchingbrazil
  • Score: 0

12:59pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.
Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have. J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

1:01pm Thu 17 Jan 13

likewatchingbrazil says...

ssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
hhhhhhhhhhh
ssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhhhhhh likewatchingbrazil
  • Score: 0

1:09pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Inspiral Saint says...

Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
Sheppy's I hope. Nice drop that!
[quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]Sheppy's I hope. Nice drop that! Inspiral Saint
  • Score: 0

1:10pm Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintJD says...

Brilliant result last night (especially when you consider according to some on here our club is in complete disarray and everyone isn't talking :)) and a great goal from Punch. Thank you Luke Shaw for signing up and showing other players that we mean to keep this team together.

Now wouldn't it be nice to get three points on Monday, preferably with everyone around us losing or drawing.

Then we'll have some momentum and real belief.

2-0 down at Chelsea the old Saints would have shipped 4 or more. Brilliant.
Brilliant result last night (especially when you consider according to some on here our club is in complete disarray and everyone isn't talking :)) and a great goal from Punch. Thank you Luke Shaw for signing up and showing other players that we mean to keep this team together. Now wouldn't it be nice to get three points on Monday, preferably with everyone around us losing or drawing. Then we'll have some momentum and real belief. 2-0 down at Chelsea the old Saints would have shipped 4 or more. Brilliant. SaintJD
  • Score: 0

1:11pm Thu 17 Jan 13

st1halo says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.
If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one!

THREE MONTHS!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

STID
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.[/p][/quote]If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one! THREE MONTHS!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA STID st1halo
  • Score: 0

1:16pm Thu 17 Jan 13

likewatchingbrazil says...

st1halo wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.
If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one!

THREE MONTHS!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

STID
3 months, that's got to be a south coast record, well done the fish.
[quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.[/p][/quote]If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one! THREE MONTHS!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA STID[/p][/quote]3 months, that's got to be a south coast record, well done the fish. likewatchingbrazil
  • Score: 0

1:16pm Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintJD says...

Where's Saintly Soul by the way? I miss his insight and accurate insider information.

Bring back Branfoot - can you log out and activate your alter ego for a few minutes?
Where's Saintly Soul by the way? I miss his insight and accurate insider information. Bring back Branfoot - can you log out and activate your alter ego for a few minutes? SaintJD
  • Score: 0

1:17pm Thu 17 Jan 13

likewatchingbrazil says...

sha la la la la la
sha la la la la la likewatchingbrazil
  • Score: 0

1:22pm Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintJD says...

There are reports today that Fulham are in for Maarten Stekelenberg at Roma.

If this is true we should be straight in to hijack that one - what a coup that would be for the club.

An Italian connection so surprised we didn't look before if he really is available.

He's 30, but that's probably four or five prime years and another five good years for a keeper.
There are reports today that Fulham are in for Maarten Stekelenberg at Roma. If this is true we should be straight in to hijack that one - what a coup that would be for the club. An Italian connection so surprised we didn't look before if he really is available. He's 30, but that's probably four or five prime years and another five good years for a keeper. SaintJD
  • Score: 0

1:22pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

likewatchingbrazil wrote:
st1halo wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.
If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one!

THREE MONTHS!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

STID
3 months, that's got to be a south coast record, well done the fish.
Crikey!...Is it really a quarter of a year since they won? With the quarter VAT bill due at the same time must make it a really depressing place to be.......WHA HA HA HA HA ....WTFILN!!
[quote][p][bold]likewatchingbrazil[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.[/p][/quote]If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one! THREE MONTHS!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA STID[/p][/quote]3 months, that's got to be a south coast record, well done the fish.[/p][/quote]Crikey!...Is it really a quarter of a year since they won? With the quarter VAT bill due at the same time must make it a really depressing place to be.......WHA HA HA HA HA ....WTFILN!! J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

1:23pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Come on Scunny!
Come on Scunny! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

1:27pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR since 1885
  • Score: 0

1:35pm Thu 17 Jan 13

st1halo says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
likewatchingbrazil wrote:
st1halo wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.
If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one!

THREE MONTHS!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

STID
3 months, that's got to be a south coast record, well done the fish.
Crikey!...Is it really a quarter of a year since they won? With the quarter VAT bill due at the same time must make it a really depressing place to be.......WHA HA HA HA HA ....WTFILN!!
Went on the snooze site the other day and they were discussing new names for Farton Park. They came up with things like Portsmouth Community Ground etc etc ...... I didn't have the heart to tell them it's going to be Portsmouth Household Waste and Recycling Centre

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

STID
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]likewatchingbrazil[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: Can someone remind me again where the skunts are in League 1 and when as the last time they won a game....I've forgotten, like some others on here have.[/p][/quote]If they don't get a win this week it'll be 3 months without one! THREE MONTHS!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA STID[/p][/quote]3 months, that's got to be a south coast record, well done the fish.[/p][/quote]Crikey!...Is it really a quarter of a year since they won? With the quarter VAT bill due at the same time must make it a really depressing place to be.......WHA HA HA HA HA ....WTFILN!![/p][/quote]Went on the snooze site the other day and they were discussing new names for Farton Park. They came up with things like Portsmouth Community Ground etc etc ...... I didn't have the heart to tell them it's going to be Portsmouth Household Waste and Recycling Centre HAHAHAHAHAHAHA STID st1halo
  • Score: 0

1:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

St Retford says...

"You muppets can get back to calling each other names."

Amazing!
"You muppets can get back to calling each other names." Amazing! St Retford
  • Score: 0

1:45pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Thornhill Saint says...

warrens 76 wrote:
business-guru wrote:
Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.
A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well..

Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions..

...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal..

His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad.

You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game..

The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..
Why go on and on about Guly? He did a job yesterday supporting Shaw down the Left and he showed a bit of skill shaking off two Chelsea players to start the move which led to the goal.

He is a squad player who is in while Lallana is out and he worked his socks off yesterday tracking back. He has had a couple of good games prior to this despite the miss you go on about. Lambert Puncheon and Rodriquez have missed sitters, or chances to play others in. Ramirez has been more guuity than anyone recently in terms of losing the ball. Why fixate on and castigate one player over and over again?

I am looking forward to Lallana coming back down the left as much as anybody else, but it I see nothing to be gained by picking out squad players and lambasting them.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]business-guru[/bold] wrote: Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.[/p][/quote]A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well.. Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions.. ...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal.. His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad. You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game.. The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..[/p][/quote]Why go on and on about Guly? He did a job yesterday supporting Shaw down the Left and he showed a bit of skill shaking off two Chelsea players to start the move which led to the goal. He is a squad player who is in while Lallana is out and he worked his socks off yesterday tracking back. He has had a couple of good games prior to this despite the miss you go on about. Lambert Puncheon and Rodriquez have missed sitters, or chances to play others in. Ramirez has been more guuity than anyone recently in terms of losing the ball. Why fixate on and castigate one player over and over again? I am looking forward to Lallana coming back down the left as much as anybody else, but it I see nothing to be gained by picking out squad players and lambasting them. Thornhill Saint
  • Score: 0

1:46pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
[quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

1:48pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

St Retford wrote:
"You muppets can get back to calling each other names."

Amazing!
I know it's joke isn't it Beaker!...:o)
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: "You muppets can get back to calling each other names." Amazing![/p][/quote]I know it's joke isn't it Beaker!...:o) J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

1:50pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
St Retford wrote:
"You muppets can get back to calling each other names."

Amazing!
I know it's joke isn't it Beaker!...:o)
Don't forget "lightweights"..doub
le whammy!!
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: "You muppets can get back to calling each other names." Amazing![/p][/quote]I know it's joke isn't it Beaker!...:o)[/p][/quote]Don't forget "lightweights"..doub le whammy!! J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

1:55pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working. since 1885
  • Score: 0

1:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
St Retford wrote:
"You muppets can get back to calling each other names."

Amazing!
I know it's joke isn't it Beaker!...:o)
Don't forget "lightweights"..doub

le whammy!!
Re: 1885, are either of you thinking what I'm thinking? I wonder how he spells rosé!
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: "You muppets can get back to calling each other names." Amazing![/p][/quote]I know it's joke isn't it Beaker!...:o)[/p][/quote]Don't forget "lightweights"..doub le whammy!![/p][/quote]Re: 1885, are either of you thinking what I'm thinking? I wonder how he spells rosé! Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

2:02pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

My own personal stalker. You're the pretentious one who threw his toys out his pram. Was it pompous or bore that upset you? COYR
My own personal stalker. You're the pretentious one who threw his toys out his pram. Was it pompous or bore that upset you? COYR since 1885
  • Score: 0

2:03pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

Nigel buy a defensive midfielder.
Nigel buy a defensive midfielder. since 1885
  • Score: 0

2:14pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
[quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!! J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

2:18pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

Stalker are you still there? Don't boil my bunny.
Stalker are you still there? Don't boil my bunny. since 1885
  • Score: 0

2:21pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!![/p][/quote]J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves. Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

2:25pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
Fair shout mush. I just dont know who's a skate and who is legit. It's a right vipers nest in here. This guy keeps coming on when I come on and mentioning me. Crazy
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!![/p][/quote]Fair shout mush. I just dont know who's a skate and who is legit. It's a right vipers nest in here. This guy keeps coming on when I come on and mentioning me. Crazy since 1885
  • Score: 0

2:25pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

Meanwhile, in the world of football, compared to what he was used to, Michael Appleton must think it's Christmas. He's just said, 'If I want to sign a player or let someone go then the owners have said that I can do that.'
Meanwhile, in the world of football, compared to what he was used to, Michael Appleton must think it's Christmas. He's just said, 'If I want to sign a player or let someone go then the owners have said that I can do that.' Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

2:28pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Strasbourg Saint wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.
I'm not, he sounds a right pleb and I'm just sticking up for the Sesame St Massive!
I can't remember any of the gang called "Stalker" or "Bunny" though....WTF is he on about ..:o)
[quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!![/p][/quote]J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.[/p][/quote]I'm not, he sounds a right pleb and I'm just sticking up for the Sesame St Massive! I can't remember any of the gang called "Stalker" or "Bunny" though....WTF is he on about ..:o) J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

2:29pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

Strasbourg Saint wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.
What's your problem pal? Everytime I come on you start giving me grief. You started trouble with me and I told you what I thought of you. Add creepy to portentous pompous bore.
[quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!![/p][/quote]J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.[/p][/quote]What's your problem pal? Everytime I come on you start giving me grief. You started trouble with me and I told you what I thought of you. Add creepy to portentous pompous bore. since 1885
  • Score: 0

2:30pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Rising_Son says...

Thornhill Saint wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
business-guru wrote:
Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.
A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well..

Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions..

...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal..

His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad.

You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game..

The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..
Why go on and on about Guly? He did a job yesterday supporting Shaw down the Left and he showed a bit of skill shaking off two Chelsea players to start the move which led to the goal.

He is a squad player who is in while Lallana is out and he worked his socks off yesterday tracking back. He has had a couple of good games prior to this despite the miss you go on about. Lambert Puncheon and Rodriquez have missed sitters, or chances to play others in. Ramirez has been more guuity than anyone recently in terms of losing the ball. Why fixate on and castigate one player over and over again?

I am looking forward to Lallana coming back down the left as much as anybody else, but it I see nothing to be gained by picking out squad players and lambasting them.
I wonder what it is that makes some people hate so much.
[quote][p][bold]Thornhill Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]business-guru[/bold] wrote: Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.[/p][/quote]A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well.. Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions.. ...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal.. His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad. You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game.. The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..[/p][/quote]Why go on and on about Guly? He did a job yesterday supporting Shaw down the Left and he showed a bit of skill shaking off two Chelsea players to start the move which led to the goal. He is a squad player who is in while Lallana is out and he worked his socks off yesterday tracking back. He has had a couple of good games prior to this despite the miss you go on about. Lambert Puncheon and Rodriquez have missed sitters, or chances to play others in. Ramirez has been more guuity than anyone recently in terms of losing the ball. Why fixate on and castigate one player over and over again? I am looking forward to Lallana coming back down the left as much as anybody else, but it I see nothing to be gained by picking out squad players and lambasting them.[/p][/quote]I wonder what it is that makes some people hate so much. Rising_Son
  • Score: 0

2:30pm Thu 17 Jan 13

since 1885 says...

I'll pop back later when the psycho's gone. Bet you any money the silly mare will follow me.
I'll pop back later when the psycho's gone. Bet you any money the silly mare will follow me. since 1885
  • Score: 0

2:36pm Thu 17 Jan 13

St Retford says...

"You muppets can get back to calling each other names."
"You muppets can get back to calling each other names." St Retford
  • Score: 0

2:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.
I'm not, he sounds a right pleb and I'm just sticking up for the Sesame St Massive!
I can't remember any of the gang called "Stalker" or "Bunny" though....WTF is he on about ..:o)
I think he reckons I'm stalking him because (and I openly apologise for this now and promise to inflict my own Daniel O'Donnell induced punishment via You Tube) I gave him attention a few days ago.

Still, great point wasn't it? Nigel Adkins, tactical genius!
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!![/p][/quote]J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.[/p][/quote]I'm not, he sounds a right pleb and I'm just sticking up for the Sesame St Massive! I can't remember any of the gang called "Stalker" or "Bunny" though....WTF is he on about ..:o)[/p][/quote]I think he reckons I'm stalking him because (and I openly apologise for this now and promise to inflict my own Daniel O'Donnell induced punishment via You Tube) I gave him attention a few days ago. Still, great point wasn't it? Nigel Adkins, tactical genius! Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

2:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Rising_Son says...

since 1885 wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
since 1885 wrote:
Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR
Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR
Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.
"Classic. You must be the funny one."
"The jokes aren't working"
Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working.
Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical.
Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended.
Chill out Gonzo!!
J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.
What's your problem pal? Everytime I come on you start giving me grief. You started trouble with me and I told you what I thought of you. Add creepy to portentous pompous bore.
since 1885, if you don't what is written on this site or the people who contribute to it, why do you join in?
[quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]since 1885[/bold] wrote: Stone me lots of juvenile insults between the idiots. Bunch of lightweights. Anyways great result, lads worked their socks off & Nigel is the right man to lead us up the table. Now you muppets can get back to calling each other names. COYR[/p][/quote]Ok thanks Gonzo...see ya..COYR[/p][/quote]Classic. You must be the funny one. Why don't you post football stuff. The jokes aren't working.[/p][/quote]"Classic. You must be the funny one." "The jokes aren't working" Firstly you have obviously hinted that humour is indeed in my post as you've replied with the above and used words such as "funny" and "jokes" but then contradict yourself by saying they are not working. Secondly the fact that you feel the need to insult other posters prior to your insulting post also makes you seem hypocritical. Maybe you should lighten up a bit and possibly keep YOUR comments purely about football so you don't get out of your pram when you get the responses that you obviously can't handle or appreciate the humour content intended. Chill out Gonzo!![/p][/quote]J7, he's not worth it. Don't feed him the attention he craves.[/p][/quote]What's your problem pal? Everytime I come on you start giving me grief. You started trouble with me and I told you what I thought of you. Add creepy to portentous pompous bore.[/p][/quote]since 1885, if you don't what is written on this site or the people who contribute to it, why do you join in? Rising_Son
  • Score: 0

2:41pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Rising_Son says...

don't like
don't like Rising_Son
  • Score: 0

2:52pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

St Retford wrote:
"You muppets can get back to calling each other names."
Thanks! Can I call you a dumb idiot? I'll let you call me a creepy, portentous, pompous bore.

Meanwhile, (trying once more to discuss footy), does anyone think Punch should be played more often on the left? I remember Strachan, when playing Fab Fernandes on the right, would argue that you don't need to beat a player to be able to cross the ball. Thus, a left-footed winger could play on the right and a right-footed winger on the left. Personally, I think that's only true if the winger has the option to cross with either foot, which Punch right now doesn't. Thus, left backs know he's going to come inside.

Once the training team have coached him into being able to cross with his right, he'll be genuine class.
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: "You muppets can get back to calling each other names."[/p][/quote]Thanks! Can I call you a dumb idiot? I'll let you call me a creepy, portentous, pompous bore. Meanwhile, (trying once more to discuss footy), does anyone think Punch should be played more often on the left? I remember Strachan, when playing Fab Fernandes on the right, would argue that you don't need to beat a player to be able to cross the ball. Thus, a left-footed winger could play on the right and a right-footed winger on the left. Personally, I think that's only true if the winger has the option to cross with either foot, which Punch right now doesn't. Thus, left backs know he's going to come inside. Once the training team have coached him into being able to cross with his right, he'll be genuine class. Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

2:54pm Thu 17 Jan 13

milton road says...

Back to football Puncheon is the player now we were all expecting when he first came, fair play to everyone at the club sorting things out and getting him back on board the bus.
Looks like a centre half is imminent Sea is back to the Cherries for the rest of the season.
The difference between this league and the championship is light years. We were a little over awed the first 10 games and our inexperience showed.
I think anyone including WHU and below is in danger of going down. Norwich put a good run together for awhile but have stuttered of late, Fulham are vulnerable and WHU have found points hard after a good start. They are all looking behind them knowing one slip and they are in amongst it.
We have control over our destiny, its now about what we do.
Back to football Puncheon is the player now we were all expecting when he first came, fair play to everyone at the club sorting things out and getting him back on board the bus. Looks like a centre half is imminent Sea is back to the Cherries for the rest of the season. The difference between this league and the championship is light years. We were a little over awed the first 10 games and our inexperience showed. I think anyone including WHU and below is in danger of going down. Norwich put a good run together for awhile but have stuttered of late, Fulham are vulnerable and WHU have found points hard after a good start. They are all looking behind them knowing one slip and they are in amongst it. We have control over our destiny, its now about what we do. milton road
  • Score: 0

2:57pm Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintJD says...

Anyone want to talk about football?

For me, we now need to see our current rosy league position as an opportunity rather than as proof we don't need to strengthen.

Sounds stupid, but being a few teams away from the relegation zone and seemingly on the up, be it by only 3 points, will make players see us as a much better proposition and increase our bargaining power.

It also removes that 'desperation' factor clubs use to increase a fee.

Let's get them in while we can.

For Saint's good and for everyone's good I just hope Arry's spending spree somehow fails, Remy turns out to be a luxury player with a bad attitude and they end up with more players who don't really give a crap about QPR.

They've got a nice run-in, so I fear it's going to be another amazing escape (though not quite as amazing when you actually look at the squad, wages and transfer kitty). I think Harry secretly knows that five points is nothing based on some of the clubs around him. They should have the resources to overtake Reading, Wigan and Villa without any miracles happening.
Anyone want to talk about football? For me, we now need to see our current rosy league position as an opportunity rather than as proof we don't need to strengthen. Sounds stupid, but being a few teams away from the relegation zone and seemingly on the up, be it by only 3 points, will make players see us as a much better proposition and increase our bargaining power. It also removes that 'desperation' factor clubs use to increase a fee. Let's get them in while we can. For Saint's good and for everyone's good I just hope Arry's spending spree somehow fails, Remy turns out to be a luxury player with a bad attitude and they end up with more players who don't really give a crap about QPR. They've got a nice run-in, so I fear it's going to be another amazing escape (though not quite as amazing when you actually look at the squad, wages and transfer kitty). I think Harry secretly knows that five points is nothing based on some of the clubs around him. They should have the resources to overtake Reading, Wigan and Villa without any miracles happening. SaintJD
  • Score: 0

3:20pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

SaintJD wrote:
Anyone want to talk about football?

For me, we now need to see our current rosy league position as an opportunity rather than as proof we don't need to strengthen.

Sounds stupid, but being a few teams away from the relegation zone and seemingly on the up, be it by only 3 points, will make players see us as a much better proposition and increase our bargaining power.

It also removes that 'desperation' factor clubs use to increase a fee.

Let's get them in while we can.

For Saint's good and for everyone's good I just hope Arry's spending spree somehow fails, Remy turns out to be a luxury player with a bad attitude and they end up with more players who don't really give a crap about QPR.

They've got a nice run-in, so I fear it's going to be another amazing escape (though not quite as amazing when you actually look at the squad, wages and transfer kitty). I think Harry secretly knows that five points is nothing based on some of the clubs around him. They should have the resources to overtake Reading, Wigan and Villa without any miracles happening.
I don't know much about Remy, but a French friend of mine doesn't really rate him. Time will tell, but one thing's for sure, bringing loads of new faces in because 'those at the club are not good enough', as 'arry did at SMS in 2005 and is doing at Loftus Road, isn't the answer. He may have bought success by building (and overpaying for) competitive squads, but his record of turning around sinking ships like the 'SS Lowe Enterprise' ain't good.

So, along with Villa and Reading (or maybe Wigan) I still see QPR going down. I really don't rate Villa and they haven't the funds to buy the couple of players that might make a difference. Alas, Reading came up a year or two too early.

Wigan? They seem to know how to scrap for points but reaching 17th would be a success.

I also think Newcastle, Sunderland and Fulham could be stressing until the last couple of matches, while Norwich and Spam should be okay.

That doesn't mean we'll be well clear. Every point is vital.
[quote][p][bold]SaintJD[/bold] wrote: Anyone want to talk about football? For me, we now need to see our current rosy league position as an opportunity rather than as proof we don't need to strengthen. Sounds stupid, but being a few teams away from the relegation zone and seemingly on the up, be it by only 3 points, will make players see us as a much better proposition and increase our bargaining power. It also removes that 'desperation' factor clubs use to increase a fee. Let's get them in while we can. For Saint's good and for everyone's good I just hope Arry's spending spree somehow fails, Remy turns out to be a luxury player with a bad attitude and they end up with more players who don't really give a crap about QPR. They've got a nice run-in, so I fear it's going to be another amazing escape (though not quite as amazing when you actually look at the squad, wages and transfer kitty). I think Harry secretly knows that five points is nothing based on some of the clubs around him. They should have the resources to overtake Reading, Wigan and Villa without any miracles happening.[/p][/quote]I don't know much about Remy, but a French friend of mine doesn't really rate him. Time will tell, but one thing's for sure, bringing loads of new faces in because 'those at the club are not good enough', as 'arry did at SMS in 2005 and is doing at Loftus Road, isn't the answer. He may have bought success by building (and overpaying for) competitive squads, but his record of turning around sinking ships like the 'SS Lowe Enterprise' ain't good. So, along with Villa and Reading (or maybe Wigan) I still see QPR going down. I really don't rate Villa and they haven't the funds to buy the couple of players that might make a difference. Alas, Reading came up a year or two too early. Wigan? They seem to know how to scrap for points but reaching 17th would be a success. I also think Newcastle, Sunderland and Fulham could be stressing until the last couple of matches, while Norwich and Spam should be okay. That doesn't mean we'll be well clear. Every point is vital. Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

3:21pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

SaintJD wrote:
Anyone want to talk about football?

For me, we now need to see our current rosy league position as an opportunity rather than as proof we don't need to strengthen.

Sounds stupid, but being a few teams away from the relegation zone and seemingly on the up, be it by only 3 points, will make players see us as a much better proposition and increase our bargaining power.

It also removes that 'desperation' factor clubs use to increase a fee.

Let's get them in while we can.

For Saint's good and for everyone's good I just hope Arry's spending spree somehow fails, Remy turns out to be a luxury player with a bad attitude and they end up with more players who don't really give a crap about QPR.

They've got a nice run-in, so I fear it's going to be another amazing escape (though not quite as amazing when you actually look at the squad, wages and transfer kitty). I think Harry secretly knows that five points is nothing based on some of the clubs around him. They should have the resources to overtake Reading, Wigan and Villa without any miracles happening.
Good points. One problem HR will have with so many new additions is hoping they all gel as a team and quickly.
If we can add just a couple or three good signings it shouldn't be to difficult to bed them in with what appears to be a happy squad.
Get Adam and Jose etc fit again and we'll be even stronger hopefully
[quote][p][bold]SaintJD[/bold] wrote: Anyone want to talk about football? For me, we now need to see our current rosy league position as an opportunity rather than as proof we don't need to strengthen. Sounds stupid, but being a few teams away from the relegation zone and seemingly on the up, be it by only 3 points, will make players see us as a much better proposition and increase our bargaining power. It also removes that 'desperation' factor clubs use to increase a fee. Let's get them in while we can. For Saint's good and for everyone's good I just hope Arry's spending spree somehow fails, Remy turns out to be a luxury player with a bad attitude and they end up with more players who don't really give a crap about QPR. They've got a nice run-in, so I fear it's going to be another amazing escape (though not quite as amazing when you actually look at the squad, wages and transfer kitty). I think Harry secretly knows that five points is nothing based on some of the clubs around him. They should have the resources to overtake Reading, Wigan and Villa without any miracles happening.[/p][/quote]Good points. One problem HR will have with so many new additions is hoping they all gel as a team and quickly. If we can add just a couple or three good signings it shouldn't be to difficult to bed them in with what appears to be a happy squad. Get Adam and Jose etc fit again and we'll be even stronger hopefully J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

3:23pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintkenny says...

for me jason seems more suited to the premier football ,he looked a better player when he went on loan .he gets more space at this level .and a number of championship teams played long ball .other than west ham .most of the teams pass the ball .his link up with clyne since arriving as been fantastic ,one of the best right side partnerships in the premier league.and luke shaw as improved getting forward more now .which look even more promising when adam comes back ,30 goals already many more to come .and a cruise to 40 points
for me jason seems more suited to the premier football ,he looked a better player when he went on loan .he gets more space at this level .and a number of championship teams played long ball .other than west ham .most of the teams pass the ball .his link up with clyne since arriving as been fantastic ,one of the best right side partnerships in the premier league.and luke shaw as improved getting forward more now .which look even more promising when adam comes back ,30 goals already many more to come .and a cruise to 40 points saintkenny
  • Score: 0

3:26pm Thu 17 Jan 13

CB FRY LIVES says...

Puddletown Saint wrote:
Surely SRL and Punch must be considered for the next England squad. Would have Luke in there as well as he was streets ahead of Cole last night. Corky cannot be far off much better than Cleverly and Nath is 10 times the player of Johnson. Ada is already there.

Fantastic result last night COYR
GOOD POST.The problem with the england team as always is that SAINTS are still perceived as being an unfashionable club by the national media-both press and tv.i listened to that donut alan bernard bird brain brazil this morning between 6-00am-7am and there was plenty of talk about the match but it was all from a chelski perspective not one saints player even got a name check .unless you counted mick channon and that was about horse racing not football.it was all about how chelsea chucked it away not abount saints' fantastic fightback and how brilliant cork,clyne,shaw,punc
heon and lambert were. i had to switch off when that poor excuse for a journalist matt scott came on talking about chelski and he momentarily forgot who chelsea were even playing last night.Pathetic or what.
[quote][p][bold]Puddletown Saint[/bold] wrote: Surely SRL and Punch must be considered for the next England squad. Would have Luke in there as well as he was streets ahead of Cole last night. Corky cannot be far off much better than Cleverly and Nath is 10 times the player of Johnson. Ada is already there. Fantastic result last night COYR[/p][/quote]GOOD POST.The problem with the england team as always is that SAINTS are still perceived as being an unfashionable club by the national media-both press and tv.i listened to that donut alan bernard bird brain brazil this morning between 6-00am-7am and there was plenty of talk about the match but it was all from a chelski perspective not one saints player even got a name check .unless you counted mick channon and that was about horse racing not football.it was all about how chelsea chucked it away not abount saints' fantastic fightback and how brilliant cork,clyne,shaw,punc heon and lambert were. i had to switch off when that poor excuse for a journalist matt scott came on talking about chelski and he momentarily forgot who chelsea were even playing last night.Pathetic or what. CB FRY LIVES
  • Score: 0

3:44pm Thu 17 Jan 13

SaintJD says...

saintkenny wrote:
for me jason seems more suited to the premier football ,he looked a better player when he went on loan .he gets more space at this level .and a number of championship teams played long ball .other than west ham .most of the teams pass the ball .his link up with clyne since arriving as been fantastic ,one of the best right side partnerships in the premier league.and luke shaw as improved getting forward more now .which look even more promising when adam comes back ,30 goals already many more to come .and a cruise to 40 points
Very true, although I'm not sure about the cruise to 40 points comment. Unless you are describing a cruise as a long journey split up with the odd storm and loads of little stops and detours. In which case that sounds more like the Saints I know.
[quote][p][bold]saintkenny[/bold] wrote: for me jason seems more suited to the premier football ,he looked a better player when he went on loan .he gets more space at this level .and a number of championship teams played long ball .other than west ham .most of the teams pass the ball .his link up with clyne since arriving as been fantastic ,one of the best right side partnerships in the premier league.and luke shaw as improved getting forward more now .which look even more promising when adam comes back ,30 goals already many more to come .and a cruise to 40 points[/p][/quote]Very true, although I'm not sure about the cruise to 40 points comment. Unless you are describing a cruise as a long journey split up with the odd storm and loads of little stops and detours. In which case that sounds more like the Saints I know. SaintJD
  • Score: 0

3:49pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Saintjock says...

warrens 76 wrote:
business-guru wrote: Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.
A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well.. Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions.. ...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal.. His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad. You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game.. The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..
Rickie's goal last would not have happened if Guly hadn't shown the tenacity and skills to win the ball, control and string out the pass in really tight circumstances. My beef with Guly's knockers is there's little balance in their criticisms - ignore or forget his many positive contributions to goals, build up play or clearances, always bring up his negatives.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]business-guru[/bold] wrote: Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.[/p][/quote]A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well.. Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions.. ...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal.. His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad. You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game.. The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..[/p][/quote]Rickie's goal last would not have happened if Guly hadn't shown the tenacity and skills to win the ball, control and string out the pass in really tight circumstances. My beef with Guly's knockers is there's little balance in their criticisms - ignore or forget his many positive contributions to goals, build up play or clearances, always bring up his negatives. Saintjock
  • Score: 0

3:54pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Guly is doing his best and working his socks off. He's being picked by the manager so support him. When we've strengthened further I'm sure he will get less game time. You can only pick a team from the squad you have and from those in it that are fit.
Guly is doing his best and working his socks off. He's being picked by the manager so support him. When we've strengthened further I'm sure he will get less game time. You can only pick a team from the squad you have and from those in it that are fit. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

3:58pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintkenny says...

SaintJD wrote:
saintkenny wrote:
for me jason seems more suited to the premier football ,he looked a better player when he went on loan .he gets more space at this level .and a number of championship teams played long ball .other than west ham .most of the teams pass the ball .his link up with clyne since arriving as been fantastic ,one of the best right side partnerships in the premier league.and luke shaw as improved getting forward more now .which look even more promising when adam comes back ,30 goals already many more to come .and a cruise to 40 points
Very true, although I'm not sure about the cruise to 40 points comment. Unless you are describing a cruise as a long journey split up with the odd storm and loads of little stops and detours. In which case that sounds more like the Saints I know.
if you look at the results .not much upto till we get to 4 points then we keep picking points up ,only 2 one nil defeats recently .so that tells you .you can see we have adapted much more .and losing fonte was a blow .the emergence of shaw ,fox was out of his depth at left back ,the norg player was at chelsea watching soon be a done deal onwards and upwards
[quote][p][bold]SaintJD[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintkenny[/bold] wrote: for me jason seems more suited to the premier football ,he looked a better player when he went on loan .he gets more space at this level .and a number of championship teams played long ball .other than west ham .most of the teams pass the ball .his link up with clyne since arriving as been fantastic ,one of the best right side partnerships in the premier league.and luke shaw as improved getting forward more now .which look even more promising when adam comes back ,30 goals already many more to come .and a cruise to 40 points[/p][/quote]Very true, although I'm not sure about the cruise to 40 points comment. Unless you are describing a cruise as a long journey split up with the odd storm and loads of little stops and detours. In which case that sounds more like the Saints I know.[/p][/quote]if you look at the results .not much upto till we get to 4 points then we keep picking points up ,only 2 one nil defeats recently .so that tells you .you can see we have adapted much more .and losing fonte was a blow .the emergence of shaw ,fox was out of his depth at left back ,the norg player was at chelsea watching soon be a done deal onwards and upwards saintkenny
  • Score: 0

4:08pm Thu 17 Jan 13

El Santo says...

warrens 76 wrote:
business-guru wrote:
Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.
A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well..

Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions..

...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal..

His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad.

You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game..

The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..
I disagree. Guly is second choice after Lallana... so he is not superb, like him, but does well when asked to play and is not crying and making noises if he is sitting on the bench. He comes out, helps Shaw like an older brother, tightens our left side and several goal occasions have started because of his physical presence and pressing on defenders (vs Arsenal). He is not great, agree, but he is a great teamplayer, a great resource to tap on when we need him.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]business-guru[/bold] wrote: Guly played well last night. He also did against Arsenal. As for punch, he will be one of the highest paid players at Saints if he stays and can make a place in the history of the club, if he plays for a few years and gets better and better, he could become a cult hero.... hope he does.[/p][/quote]A few accurate passes and mainly anonymity do not qualify as did well.. Guly is a player who does not deliver enough, no were near enough, he cannot mix it, has missed sitters and most important failed on match winning occassions.. ...be it a pathetic header at pmuff that allowed an equaliser or open goal after open goal.. His crossing occassionally looks good ONLY because everyone else, bar Shaw has recently been so bad. You replace Guly with a player who can turn matches and look at the results we could have had...never mind the general positive influencing or in has case not of the game.. The word is effective and he is neither fish nor fowl..[/p][/quote]I disagree. Guly is second choice after Lallana... so he is not superb, like him, but does well when asked to play and is not crying and making noises if he is sitting on the bench. He comes out, helps Shaw like an older brother, tightens our left side and several goal occasions have started because of his physical presence and pressing on defenders (vs Arsenal). He is not great, agree, but he is a great teamplayer, a great resource to tap on when we need him. El Santo
  • Score: 0

4:14pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

Taunton Saint wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
BBB

I'll be fair, if you were debating, then fine, I was at work so wasnt here.

But you go on to state .....

"And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun"

Really? seen you get quite personal a number of times

Sorry mate, hung by your own Petard
Taunton, "personal" is all he does under the BBB sign on. As saintly..ah..sole, he's obsessed with made up "in the know" facts.

This is the first thread where I've ever seen him debate football. Hopefully it'll carry on and he'll drop the tedious aggression.
[quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]BBB I'll be fair, if you were debating, then fine, I was at work so wasnt here. But you go on to state ..... "And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun" Really? seen you get quite personal a number of times Sorry mate, hung by your own Petard[/p][/quote]Taunton, "personal" is all he does under the BBB sign on. As saintly..ah..sole, he's obsessed with made up "in the know" facts. This is the first thread where I've ever seen him debate football. Hopefully it'll carry on and he'll drop the tedious aggression. Velleity
  • Score: 0

4:20pm Thu 17 Jan 13

three halves says...

I dont think Guly will ever win over the supporters as he is simply not good enough even if he is trying harder.
I dont think Guly will ever win over the supporters as he is simply not good enough even if he is trying harder. three halves
  • Score: 0

4:26pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

Sorry, I should have ignored Saintly..ah..soul/Br
ing back Branfoot.

Anway, back to footy...

Puncheon looks like a different player this year: he's clearly mentally committed in a way that I didn't see before the bust up with the club. I do wonder if the periods out on loan where no-one wanted him for good made him realise that his attitude was self-destructive. Whatever it is, his mind is where the difference is. He always had the skill but seemed to choose when to show it.

I said during the game last night that Guly appeared to be having a mare. I've just watched the extended highlights and he seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made, so not so sure. Whatever he is, it's frustarting to a lot of people. When he's on form he's sublime. I wonder if theres any of Puncheon's problems in him.

Then again, NA quite clearly rates him or he wouldn't have him out so much. There's clearly something there that we can't see (or choose not to see).
Sorry, I should have ignored Saintly..ah..soul/Br ing back Branfoot. Anway, back to footy... Puncheon looks like a different player this year: he's clearly mentally committed in a way that I didn't see before the bust up with the club. I do wonder if the periods out on loan where no-one wanted him for good made him realise that his attitude was self-destructive. Whatever it is, his mind is where the difference is. He always had the skill but seemed to choose when to show it. I said during the game last night that Guly appeared to be having a mare. I've just watched the extended highlights and he seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made, so not so sure. Whatever he is, it's frustarting to a lot of people. When he's on form he's sublime. I wonder if theres any of Puncheon's problems in him. Then again, NA quite clearly rates him or he wouldn't have him out so much. There's clearly something there that we can't see (or choose not to see). Velleity
  • Score: 0

4:35pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Beer Monster says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Guly is doing his best and working his socks off. He's being picked by the manager so support him. When we've strengthened further I'm sure he will get less game time. You can only pick a team from the squad you have and from those in it that are fit.
This. Cheers Seed :-)
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Guly is doing his best and working his socks off. He's being picked by the manager so support him. When we've strengthened further I'm sure he will get less game time. You can only pick a team from the squad you have and from those in it that are fit.[/p][/quote]This. Cheers Seed :-) Beer Monster
  • Score: 0

5:45pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintmac says...

Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made".

I think he is the type of player we don't
always appreciate just how much he
quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?
Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made". I think he is the type of player we don't always appreciate just how much he quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't? saintmac
  • Score: 0

6:38pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintshorse101 says...

i wasnt happy with punch when he went out on loan to qpr because of the way he did it and said at the time that i didnt want him back at saints. when he came back i thought that he would be disruptive at the training ground. then he made those twitter comments, i thought his days were numbered. however when he made his peace with NC and NA and was picked to play i supported him. i have since said that i was wrong to want him gone and am glad to say that. he has turned into one of our best players. his partnership with clyne on the right is a delight to see and if lalla and shaw can do the same on the left we will be force to be reckoned with.
i wish people would treat guly the same, you may not like him or wouldnt pick him but if NA picks him then support him, look at the way chelski`s fans reacted to torres last night, booing him on and then during the game, it must have affected him!
i wasnt happy with punch when he went out on loan to qpr because of the way he did it and said at the time that i didnt want him back at saints. when he came back i thought that he would be disruptive at the training ground. then he made those twitter comments, i thought his days were numbered. however when he made his peace with NC and NA and was picked to play i supported him. i have since said that i was wrong to want him gone and am glad to say that. he has turned into one of our best players. his partnership with clyne on the right is a delight to see and if lalla and shaw can do the same on the left we will be force to be reckoned with. i wish people would treat guly the same, you may not like him or wouldnt pick him but if NA picks him then support him, look at the way chelski`s fans reacted to torres last night, booing him on and then during the game, it must have affected him! saintshorse101
  • Score: 0

7:05pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
i wasnt happy with punch when he went out on loan to qpr because of the way he did it and said at the time that i didnt want him back at saints. when he came back i thought that he would be disruptive at the training ground. then he made those twitter comments, i thought his days were numbered. however when he made his peace with NC and NA and was picked to play i supported him. i have since said that i was wrong to want him gone and am glad to say that. he has turned into one of our best players. his partnership with clyne on the right is a delight to see and if lalla and shaw can do the same on the left we will be force to be reckoned with.
i wish people would treat guly the same, you may not like him or wouldnt pick him but if NA picks him then support him, look at the way chelski`s fans reacted to torres last night, booing him on and then during the game, it must have affected him!
That.

...it's really good to be proved wrong sometimes COYR! :O)
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: i wasnt happy with punch when he went out on loan to qpr because of the way he did it and said at the time that i didnt want him back at saints. when he came back i thought that he would be disruptive at the training ground. then he made those twitter comments, i thought his days were numbered. however when he made his peace with NC and NA and was picked to play i supported him. i have since said that i was wrong to want him gone and am glad to say that. he has turned into one of our best players. his partnership with clyne on the right is a delight to see and if lalla and shaw can do the same on the left we will be force to be reckoned with. i wish people would treat guly the same, you may not like him or wouldnt pick him but if NA picks him then support him, look at the way chelski`s fans reacted to torres last night, booing him on and then during the game, it must have affected him![/p][/quote]That. ...it's really good to be proved wrong sometimes COYR! :O) Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

7:23pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Sorry val, I zoned out. You have no personality and no life, your posts demonstrate this. You spend every waking hour trawling through old posts trying to prove meaningless points. You are so stupid that you persist in claiming I'm sainty soul, which I'm not.

You're one of a few on here who take this thread too seriously and like to dish it out but can't take it. That's what makes you all amusing, in a sad way!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Sorry val, I zoned out. You have no personality and no life, your posts demonstrate this. You spend every waking hour trawling through old posts trying to prove meaningless points. You are so stupid that you persist in claiming I'm sainty soul, which I'm not. You're one of a few on here who take this thread too seriously and like to dish it out but can't take it. That's what makes you all amusing, in a sad way! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

7:25pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!! saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

7:26pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

saintmac wrote:
Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made".

I think he is the type of player we don't
always appreciate just how much he
quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?
Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake!

I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him.

I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another.

Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud.
[quote][p][bold]saintmac[/bold] wrote: Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made". I think he is the type of player we don't always appreciate just how much he quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?[/p][/quote]Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake! I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him. I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another. Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud. Velleity
  • Score: 0

7:27pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Sadder still is that even when you group up, you still can't come out on top. You have to resort to f this and f that. No class and no comebacks. I'm giving it large and you can't stand it.
Sadder still is that even when you group up, you still can't come out on top. You have to resort to f this and f that. No class and no comebacks. I'm giving it large and you can't stand it. Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

7:28pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Folkestone Saint says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Guly is doing his best and working his socks off. He's being picked by the manager so support him. When we've strengthened further I'm sure he will get less game time. You can only pick a team from the squad you have and from those in it that are fit.
What have you done with the real Seedy, that was quite deep :o)
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Guly is doing his best and working his socks off. He's being picked by the manager so support him. When we've strengthened further I'm sure he will get less game time. You can only pick a team from the squad you have and from those in it that are fit.[/p][/quote]What have you done with the real Seedy, that was quite deep :o) Folkestone Saint
  • Score: 0

7:30pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Sorry val, I zoned out. You have no personality and no life, your posts demonstrate this. You spend every waking hour trawling through old posts trying to prove meaningless points. You are so stupid that you persist in claiming I'm sainty soul, which I'm not.

You're one of a few on here who take this thread too seriously and like to dish it out but can't take it. That's what makes you all amusing, in a sad way!
BBB thanks confirming you're not me. I've just confirmed I'm not you!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Sorry val, I zoned out. You have no personality and no life, your posts demonstrate this. You spend every waking hour trawling through old posts trying to prove meaningless points. You are so stupid that you persist in claiming I'm sainty soul, which I'm not. You're one of a few on here who take this thread too seriously and like to dish it out but can't take it. That's what makes you all amusing, in a sad way![/p][/quote]BBB thanks confirming you're not me. I've just confirmed I'm not you!!!!! saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

7:32pm Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

Velleity wrote:
saintmac wrote:
Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made".

I think he is the type of player we don't
always appreciate just how much he
quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?
Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake!

I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him.

I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another.

Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud.
Velleity NO...if you walked into my pub and said Guly is a good player I would say Velleity as much as I like your repartee and as much as your humour and love of Saints is my cup of tea I would say NO Velleity NO, Guly does not put himself abaaat he may be Brazilian but if he continues to miss and eff up like he does I would be forced to take action..wallop.
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintmac[/bold] wrote: Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made". I think he is the type of player we don't always appreciate just how much he quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?[/p][/quote]Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake! I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him. I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another. Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud.[/p][/quote]Velleity NO...if you walked into my pub and said Guly is a good player I would say Velleity as much as I like your repartee and as much as your humour and love of Saints is my cup of tea I would say NO Velleity NO, Guly does not put himself abaaat he may be Brazilian but if he continues to miss and eff up like he does I would be forced to take action..wallop. warrens 76
  • Score: 0

7:32pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
Fine by me (I have no bother as to who you are...if you were a wum...it would just make you a bit of a saddo imo)....opinions are not a problem...but if you want to make bold radical statements, then at least back them up with somekind of evidence.
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]Fine by me (I have no bother as to who you are...if you were a wum...it would just make you a bit of a saddo imo)....opinions are not a problem...but if you want to make bold radical statements, then at least back them up with somekind of evidence. Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

7:34pm Thu 17 Jan 13

angus mc coatup says...

I pretty much felt the same as saintshorse about punch.but everyone is enttled to a second chance,and boy am I glad he took It.great skill and tehnique for his goal last night, and he is going from strength to strength.I think nigel must have had a huge part to play in his redemption and attitude change.
mind you I think mr adkins has played a huge part in our recent resurgence in form results and all things saints.to all the critics out there,well all I can say is this,If this Is nigel,and the team out of their depth.then roll on the day they come to terms with this division.
I pretty much felt the same as saintshorse about punch.but everyone is enttled to a second chance,and boy am I glad he took It.great skill and tehnique for his goal last night, and he is going from strength to strength.I think nigel must have had a huge part to play in his redemption and attitude change. mind you I think mr adkins has played a huge part in our recent resurgence in form results and all things saints.to all the critics out there,well all I can say is this,If this Is nigel,and the team out of their depth.then roll on the day they come to terms with this division. angus mc coatup
  • Score: 0

7:36pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintkenny says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
wrong na and nc get on well ,have never had a problem .nc as just backed na in bringing in the new player ,and all the players that nigel chose to bring in .were all nigels choice ,nigel has been backed with more cash in saints long history than any other manager ,nigel is very happy at this club managing a club in the premier league .he his living his dream .you think you know a lot but you have got this 100 percent wrong,there is always going to be pressure in the premier league ,next season will test nigels loyalty when other clubs will want ,we may be faced with the problems swansea and norwich faced at the start of this season,come next august
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]wrong na and nc get on well ,have never had a problem .nc as just backed na in bringing in the new player ,and all the players that nigel chose to bring in .were all nigels choice ,nigel has been backed with more cash in saints long history than any other manager ,nigel is very happy at this club managing a club in the premier league .he his living his dream .you think you know a lot but you have got this 100 percent wrong,there is always going to be pressure in the premier league ,next season will test nigels loyalty when other clubs will want ,we may be faced with the problems swansea and norwich faced at the start of this season,come next august saintkenny
  • Score: 0

7:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
I pretty much felt the same as saintshorse about punch.but everyone is enttled to a second chance,and boy am I glad he took It.great skill and tehnique for his goal last night, and he is going from strength to strength.I think nigel must have had a huge part to play in his redemption and attitude change.
mind you I think mr adkins has played a huge part in our recent resurgence in form results and all things saints.to all the critics out there,well all I can say is this,If this Is nigel,and the team out of their depth.then roll on the day they come to terms with this division.
Very well said sir!
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: I pretty much felt the same as saintshorse about punch.but everyone is enttled to a second chance,and boy am I glad he took It.great skill and tehnique for his goal last night, and he is going from strength to strength.I think nigel must have had a huge part to play in his redemption and attitude change. mind you I think mr adkins has played a huge part in our recent resurgence in form results and all things saints.to all the critics out there,well all I can say is this,If this Is nigel,and the team out of their depth.then roll on the day they come to terms with this division.[/p][/quote]Very well said sir! warrens 76
  • Score: 0

7:40pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Sorry val, I zoned out. You have no personality and no life, your posts demonstrate this. You spend every waking hour trawling through old posts trying to prove meaningless points. You are so stupid that you persist in claiming I'm sainty soul, which I'm not.

You're one of a few on here who take this thread too seriously and like to dish it out but can't take it. That's what makes you all amusing, in a sad way!
BBB thanks confirming you're not me. I've just confirmed I'm not you!!!!!
and done just two minutes apart, ideal timing to log out of one and into the other, then back on, and then back off

Brilliant you are genius, just so good for us all
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Sorry val, I zoned out. You have no personality and no life, your posts demonstrate this. You spend every waking hour trawling through old posts trying to prove meaningless points. You are so stupid that you persist in claiming I'm sainty soul, which I'm not. You're one of a few on here who take this thread too seriously and like to dish it out but can't take it. That's what makes you all amusing, in a sad way![/p][/quote]BBB thanks confirming you're not me. I've just confirmed I'm not you!!!!![/p][/quote]and done just two minutes apart, ideal timing to log out of one and into the other, then back on, and then back off Brilliant you are genius, just so good for us all Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

7:42pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Rob The Saint NOT in NZ says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Sadder still is that even when you group up, you still can't come out on top. You have to resort to f this and f that. No class and no comebacks. I'm giving it large and you can't stand it.
Using the phrase 'giving it large' shows all we need to know about you...

You seem to like to give cheap, childish abuse to others, whilst complaining about receiving stick.

The words 'pot, kettle & black' come to mind.

Try & stick to debating all matters concerning Saints, because when you get on your high horse you come a cropper all the time.

Back to the thread, & for what it's worth I thought Puncheon was gladly on the way out of Saints a year ago, but he has swallowed a lot of humble & knuckled down to really apply himself to the cause.

I really hope he does want to stay & that a deal will be done. He has been like a new signing this season & his goal last night was pure class.

COYR!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: Sadder still is that even when you group up, you still can't come out on top. You have to resort to f this and f that. No class and no comebacks. I'm giving it large and you can't stand it.[/p][/quote]Using the phrase 'giving it large' shows all we need to know about you... You seem to like to give cheap, childish abuse to others, whilst complaining about receiving stick. The words 'pot, kettle & black' come to mind. Try & stick to debating all matters concerning Saints, because when you get on your high horse you come a cropper all the time. Back to the thread, & for what it's worth I thought Puncheon was gladly on the way out of Saints a year ago, but he has swallowed a lot of humble & knuckled down to really apply himself to the cause. I really hope he does want to stay & that a deal will be done. He has been like a new signing this season & his goal last night was pure class. COYR! Rob The Saint NOT in NZ
  • Score: 0

7:42pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
saintmac wrote:
Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made".

I think he is the type of player we don't
always appreciate just how much he
quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?
Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake!

I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him.

I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another.

Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud.
Velleity NO...if you walked into my pub and said Guly is a good player I would say Velleity as much as I like your repartee and as much as your humour and love of Saints is my cup of tea I would say NO Velleity NO, Guly does not put himself abaaat he may be Brazilian but if he continues to miss and eff up like he does I would be forced to take action..wallop.
I think we ave to accept that opinion is divided on the matter of Guly's performances.
I have made a point of watching his movement off the ball and his workrate is actually very good.
I have to admit that he is yet to really prove himself when he get a chance on target though.
As with Punch....it would be great to see him make the grade.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintmac[/bold] wrote: Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made". I think he is the type of player we don't always appreciate just how much he quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?[/p][/quote]Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake! I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him. I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another. Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud.[/p][/quote]Velleity NO...if you walked into my pub and said Guly is a good player I would say Velleity as much as I like your repartee and as much as your humour and love of Saints is my cup of tea I would say NO Velleity NO, Guly does not put himself abaaat he may be Brazilian but if he continues to miss and eff up like he does I would be forced to take action..wallop.[/p][/quote]I think we ave to accept that opinion is divided on the matter of Guly's performances. I have made a point of watching his movement off the ball and his workrate is actually very good. I have to admit that he is yet to really prove himself when he get a chance on target though. As with Punch....it would be great to see him make the grade. Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

7:42pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

saintkenny wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
wrong na and nc get on well ,have never had a problem .nc as just backed na in bringing in the new player ,and all the players that nigel chose to bring in .were all nigels choice ,nigel has been backed with more cash in saints long history than any other manager ,nigel is very happy at this club managing a club in the premier league .he his living his dream .you think you know a lot but you have got this 100 percent wrong,there is always going to be pressure in the premier league ,next season will test nigels loyalty when other clubs will want ,we may be faced with the problems swansea and norwich faced at the start of this season,come next august
I hope you're right I'm reporting what I've been told. I hope NA is happy as he's a decent man and deserves support from the chairman he's clearly popular with the fans and I'd like to see him stay for the rest of the season hopefully he will!

As far as Punch is concerned I'm delighted for the lad. He's had his problems in the past but he's addressed them and knuckled down. I'm pleased to see he's looking after Luke Shaw that's the sign of a good professional who looks out for the younger players. Punch just shows that with the right attitude, belief and ficus you can surmount any problem. I wish him well and to be reading soon that he's been given a new contract he deserves it!
[quote][p][bold]saintkenny[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]wrong na and nc get on well ,have never had a problem .nc as just backed na in bringing in the new player ,and all the players that nigel chose to bring in .were all nigels choice ,nigel has been backed with more cash in saints long history than any other manager ,nigel is very happy at this club managing a club in the premier league .he his living his dream .you think you know a lot but you have got this 100 percent wrong,there is always going to be pressure in the premier league ,next season will test nigels loyalty when other clubs will want ,we may be faced with the problems swansea and norwich faced at the start of this season,come next august[/p][/quote]I hope you're right I'm reporting what I've been told. I hope NA is happy as he's a decent man and deserves support from the chairman he's clearly popular with the fans and I'd like to see him stay for the rest of the season hopefully he will! As far as Punch is concerned I'm delighted for the lad. He's had his problems in the past but he's addressed them and knuckled down. I'm pleased to see he's looking after Luke Shaw that's the sign of a good professional who looks out for the younger players. Punch just shows that with the right attitude, belief and ficus you can surmount any problem. I wish him well and to be reading soon that he's been given a new contract he deserves it! saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

7:57pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintkenny says...

saintlysoul wrote:
saintkenny wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
wrong na and nc get on well ,have never had a problem .nc as just backed na in bringing in the new player ,and all the players that nigel chose to bring in .were all nigels choice ,nigel has been backed with more cash in saints long history than any other manager ,nigel is very happy at this club managing a club in the premier league .he his living his dream .you think you know a lot but you have got this 100 percent wrong,there is always going to be pressure in the premier league ,next season will test nigels loyalty when other clubs will want ,we may be faced with the problems swansea and norwich faced at the start of this season,come next august
I hope you're right I'm reporting what I've been told. I hope NA is happy as he's a decent man and deserves support from the chairman he's clearly popular with the fans and I'd like to see him stay for the rest of the season hopefully he will!

As far as Punch is concerned I'm delighted for the lad. He's had his problems in the past but he's addressed them and knuckled down. I'm pleased to see he's looking after Luke Shaw that's the sign of a good professional who looks out for the younger players. Punch just shows that with the right attitude, belief and ficus you can surmount any problem. I wish him well and to be reading soon that he's been given a new contract he deserves it!
whatever happened was his problem and he appolgized and got on with his football .jason is more suited to premier league football .he did better when we sent him on loan .but the na bringing clyne in .and nc backed this has gave us a great right side ,nigel thought about this and these 2 are formidable on the right linking up for a number of goals now .so i would expect him to get a new contract.he must have been fed up going out on loan ,now its all going well for him.with na if your losing games in the premier league then the media will pressure the manager .and nc could of fallen to that earlier.having only got 4 points .but he remained patient.and stuck with nigel .and now he can see he has made the right decision.you can see the team as adapted now .only 2 defeats 1 0 losses .back to a point a game .remarkable turn around and na gets all credit for that
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintkenny[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]wrong na and nc get on well ,have never had a problem .nc as just backed na in bringing in the new player ,and all the players that nigel chose to bring in .were all nigels choice ,nigel has been backed with more cash in saints long history than any other manager ,nigel is very happy at this club managing a club in the premier league .he his living his dream .you think you know a lot but you have got this 100 percent wrong,there is always going to be pressure in the premier league ,next season will test nigels loyalty when other clubs will want ,we may be faced with the problems swansea and norwich faced at the start of this season,come next august[/p][/quote]I hope you're right I'm reporting what I've been told. I hope NA is happy as he's a decent man and deserves support from the chairman he's clearly popular with the fans and I'd like to see him stay for the rest of the season hopefully he will! As far as Punch is concerned I'm delighted for the lad. He's had his problems in the past but he's addressed them and knuckled down. I'm pleased to see he's looking after Luke Shaw that's the sign of a good professional who looks out for the younger players. Punch just shows that with the right attitude, belief and ficus you can surmount any problem. I wish him well and to be reading soon that he's been given a new contract he deserves it![/p][/quote]whatever happened was his problem and he appolgized and got on with his football .jason is more suited to premier league football .he did better when we sent him on loan .but the na bringing clyne in .and nc backed this has gave us a great right side ,nigel thought about this and these 2 are formidable on the right linking up for a number of goals now .so i would expect him to get a new contract.he must have been fed up going out on loan ,now its all going well for him.with na if your losing games in the premier league then the media will pressure the manager .and nc could of fallen to that earlier.having only got 4 points .but he remained patient.and stuck with nigel .and now he can see he has made the right decision.you can see the team as adapted now .only 2 defeats 1 0 losses .back to a point a game .remarkable turn around and na gets all credit for that saintkenny
  • Score: 0

7:59pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintshorse101 says...

when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc.
i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you.
by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away.
cue the i`m better than you abuse!
when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc. i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you. by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away. cue the i`m better than you abuse! saintshorse101
  • Score: 0

8:02pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!! slugger
  • Score: 0

8:03pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up.

They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.
I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up. They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored. Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

8:09pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc.
i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you.
by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away.
cue the i`m better than you abuse!
You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me!
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc. i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you. by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away. cue the i`m better than you abuse![/p][/quote]You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

8:10pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Nemesisaint says...

Perhaps when Jason Puncheon got into his bit of bother, we got the wrong end of the stick? At the time he was accused of bullying Oxlade Chamberlain, it may be that he was trying to help him but Chamberlain was too arrogant to accept his help, it seems that Jason has been instrumental in Luke Shaws progress, so did we have Jason wrongly accused at the time?
Perhaps when Jason Puncheon got into his bit of bother, we got the wrong end of the stick? At the time he was accused of bullying Oxlade Chamberlain, it may be that he was trying to help him but Chamberlain was too arrogant to accept his help, it seems that Jason has been instrumental in Luke Shaws progress, so did we have Jason wrongly accused at the time? Nemesisaint
  • Score: 0

8:10pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintkenny says...

a point is there is a difference to what knowledge you have and what you are told .any person should do research and make sure it is fact and not fiction before posting comments to that effect .otherwise it has no substance
a point is there is a difference to what knowledge you have and what you are told .any person should do research and make sure it is fact and not fiction before posting comments to that effect .otherwise it has no substance saintkenny
  • Score: 0

8:12pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc.
i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you.
by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away.
cue the i`m better than you abuse!
You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me!
Yeah , thanks mush .......... you wanna talk football or just insult people (you hate people insulting rather than talking football, right?).
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc. i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you. by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away. cue the i`m better than you abuse![/p][/quote]You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me![/p][/quote]Yeah , thanks mush .......... you wanna talk football or just insult people (you hate people insulting rather than talking football, right?). slugger
  • Score: 0

8:20pm Thu 17 Jan 13

mack chinnon says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc.
i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you.
by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away.
cue the i`m better than you abuse!
You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me!
Fcuk off you boring kunt.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc. i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you. by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away. cue the i`m better than you abuse![/p][/quote]You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me![/p][/quote]Fcuk off you boring kunt. mack chinnon
  • Score: 0

8:22pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc.
i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you.
by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away.
cue the i`m better than you abuse!
Absolutely spot on. No Saints fan I've ever met has a good word to say about Branfoot - more hated than Lowe.
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc. i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you. by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away. cue the i`m better than you abuse![/p][/quote]Absolutely spot on. No Saints fan I've ever met has a good word to say about Branfoot - more hated than Lowe. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:24pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

mack chinnon wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc.
i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you.
by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away.
cue the i`m better than you abuse!
You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me!
Fcuk off you boring kunt.
Language Timothy. Still boss hogging my way around the thread! The yokels are seething. Lol
[quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: when you get a poster on here who continually tells everyone else how great he is and how everyone else is stupid, how he is able to outwit us all, how he only wants to debate football yet has only done so on 1 thread, who says he dosent abuse other posters yet abuses 1 poster to the point of them leaving and then abusing another poster, all this whilst having a sign in name proclaiming his want of the most hated manager in saints history back. you have to wonder and ask yourself what is their aim? particularly as its clear to all that they use a second log in name to back up their first and to rubbish to club the chairman and the manager, his tactics, signings, lack of money, etc etc. i dont care if you want to be a wum! thats your choice, and a choice that you have to live with. but i like many other posters dont bother taking any notice of you. by the way i know not any saints fan who would use branfoots name in any manner other than negative, kind of a give away. cue the i`m better than you abuse![/p][/quote]You know I'm great. Why I have a monopoly on the truth! That I take my precious time to school the happy clapping simpletons about football, they should be thanking me![/p][/quote]Fcuk off you boring kunt.[/p][/quote]Language Timothy. Still boss hogging my way around the thread! The yokels are seething. Lol Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

8:25pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

C'mon BBB , let's talk football .
C'mon BBB , let's talk football . slugger
  • Score: 0

8:26pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything? saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

8:26pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

That looks like another penalty we didn't get in the photo....bl00dy refs!! we should have won it!...:o)
That looks like another penalty we didn't get in the photo....bl00dy refs!! we should have won it!...:o) J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

8:28pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)
Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :) Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:31pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
You said JWP would start , all opinions are great ..... i guess it's just the way those opinions are voiced by some is the giveaway .
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]You said JWP would start , all opinions are great ..... i guess it's just the way those opinions are voiced by some is the giveaway . slugger
  • Score: 0

8:34pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
You said JWP would start , all opinions are great ..... i guess it's just the way those opinions are voiced by some is the giveaway .
Did I? Ah well yes I suppose the ways things are said make a difference. I may come across arrogant but I'm not just a football lover!!!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]You said JWP would start , all opinions are great ..... i guess it's just the way those opinions are voiced by some is the giveaway .[/p][/quote]Did I? Ah well yes I suppose the ways things are said make a difference. I may come across arrogant but I'm not just a football lover!!! saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

8:35pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)
mmmmm......pub...
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)[/p][/quote]mmmmm......pub... J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

8:35pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Folkestone Saint says...

Strasbourg Saint wrote:
I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up.

They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.
Yep, gunna have to get a new wheel fitted to my mouse the amount of scrolling through the trolling decent folk have to do here
[quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up. They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.[/p][/quote]Yep, gunna have to get a new wheel fitted to my mouse the amount of scrolling through the trolling decent folk have to do here Folkestone Saint
  • Score: 0

8:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)
I'm not you , Bill is not you , j7 is not you , velleity is not you , mack is not you , puppy is not you ......... I dearly hope that one day some wum decides we are all one person and actually turns up !
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)[/p][/quote]I'm not you , Bill is not you , j7 is not you , velleity is not you , mack is not you , puppy is not you ......... I dearly hope that one day some wum decides we are all one person and actually turns up ! slugger
  • Score: 0

8:37pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Bring back Branfoot says...

Strasbourg Saint wrote:
I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up.

They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.
Zzzzzzzzz wake me up when he finishes!
[quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up. They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.[/p][/quote]Zzzzzzzzz wake me up when he finishes! Bring back Branfoot
  • Score: 0

8:39pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:43pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up.

They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.
Zzzzzzzzz wake me up when he finishes!
Stay asleep or preferably go into a coma.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: I came to conclusion long ago that SaintlySoul and BBB were, along with several notable others, responsible for ruining many of these Echo threads. I really don't care whether they're Saints fans, skates, or not even footy fans, or whether or not they are one and the same, they are guilty of regularly posting stuff which contributes nothing to the debate and deliberately winds people up. They have earned just one right - when it comes to anything they write - the right to be completely ignored.[/p][/quote]Zzzzzzzzz wake me up when he finishes![/p][/quote]Stay asleep or preferably go into a coma. J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

8:43pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

I've been reviewing the album, I think two of my tracks are good but nothing comes close to the quality of TonyinLiberia's version of The Clash and London Calling.
I've been reviewing the album, I think two of my tracks are good but nothing comes close to the quality of TonyinLiberia's version of The Clash and London Calling. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:44pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


--------------------
---

You've been sussed matey!
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. -------------------- --- You've been sussed matey! Velleity
  • Score: 0

8:45pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)
I'm not you , Bill is not you , j7 is not you , velleity is not you , mack is not you , puppy is not you ......... I dearly hope that one day some wum decides we are all one person and actually turns up !
I was but I'm ok now
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)[/p][/quote]I'm not you , Bill is not you , j7 is not you , velleity is not you , mack is not you , puppy is not you ......... I dearly hope that one day some wum decides we are all one person and actually turns up ![/p][/quote]I was but I'm ok now J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

8:45pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Admin calling; to the faraway few
When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do
Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss
It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost
Admin calling; now don’t look to us
Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing
Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Admin calling; to the imitation zone
Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone
Admin calling; to the zombies of death
The trust’s empty promises are all you have left
Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout
But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs
‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Now get this…
Admin calling; said were you there too?
When they said pack the park; was that all you could do?
Admin calling; in just a short while
And after all this, won’t you give me a smile
Admin calling …
Admin calling…
I never felt so much like like like...
Admin calling; to the faraway few When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost Admin calling; now don’t look to us Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Admin calling; to the imitation zone Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone Admin calling; to the zombies of death The trust’s empty promises are all you have left Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs ‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Now get this… Admin calling; said were you there too? When they said pack the park; was that all you could do? Admin calling; in just a short while And after all this, won’t you give me a smile Admin calling … Admin calling… I never felt so much like like like... Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:48pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

Velleity wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life.


--------------------

---

You've been sussed matey!
They/he/she/it went very quiet when we equalized...
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life. -------------------- --- You've been sussed matey![/p][/quote]They/he/she/it went very quiet when we equalized... Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

8:48pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Strasbourg Saint says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)
I'm not you , Bill is not you , j7 is not you , velleity is not you , mack is not you , puppy is not you ......... I dearly hope that one day some wum decides we are all one person and actually turns up !
One thing's for sure, I'm me ...... and so is my wife!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Branfoot thinks we are all the same person. He's welcome to come to the Joshua Tree and meet all one of us. I'm sure J7 would really like that :)[/p][/quote]I'm not you , Bill is not you , j7 is not you , velleity is not you , mack is not you , puppy is not you ......... I dearly hope that one day some wum decides we are all one person and actually turns up ![/p][/quote]One thing's for sure, I'm me ...... and so is my wife! Strasbourg Saint
  • Score: 0

8:49pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad. saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

8:51pm Thu 17 Jan 13

angus mc coatup says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
fcuk off you boring kunt...........
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]fcuk off you boring kunt........... angus mc coatup
  • Score: 0

8:52pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

saintmac wrote:
Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made".

I think he is the type of player we don't
always appreciate just how much he
quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?
Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake!

I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him.

I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another.

Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud.
[quote][p][bold]saintmac[/bold] wrote: Velleity - I think you answered your own question when you said "He (Guly) seemed to be involved in a good number of the decent moves we made". I think he is the type of player we don't always appreciate just how much he quietly contributes. Sure,he has made mistakes but then who hasn't?[/p][/quote]Just to be clear, I support him. I rate him very highly. The guy has an 87% pass completion rate this season, for LeTiss's sake! I hated him at first, then saw that he was subtly terrific; last night on a bad feed I didn't like what he was doing, today on the highlights I did. I can see why there is so much divided feeling about him. I do think that one of the things people don't like is that if a ball's out of reach, he knows quickly and stops moving. Fans prefer someone who huffs and puffs even after lost balls. Visible effort is one thing, good ball skills another. Not trying to ignite a flame war, just thinking aloud. Velleity
  • Score: 0

8:52pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Admin calling; to the faraway few
When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do
Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss
It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost
Admin calling; now don’t look to us
Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing
Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Admin calling; to the imitation zone
Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone
Admin calling; to the zombies of death
The trust’s empty promises are all you have left
Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout
But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs
‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Now get this…
Admin calling; said were you there too?
When they said pack the park; was that all you could do?
Admin calling; in just a short while
And after all this, won’t you give me a smile
Admin calling …
Admin calling…
I never felt so much like like like...
The best yet ........ get it recorded !
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Admin calling; to the faraway few When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost Admin calling; now don’t look to us Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Admin calling; to the imitation zone Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone Admin calling; to the zombies of death The trust’s empty promises are all you have left Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs ‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Now get this… Admin calling; said were you there too? When they said pack the park; was that all you could do? Admin calling; in just a short while And after all this, won’t you give me a smile Admin calling … Admin calling… I never felt so much like like like...[/p][/quote]The best yet ........ get it recorded ! slugger
  • Score: 0

8:54pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
fcuk off you boring kunt...........
And what do you do for a living go on surprise me? Or shall I guess?
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]fcuk off you boring kunt...........[/p][/quote]And what do you do for a living go on surprise me? Or shall I guess? saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

8:54pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Does anyone else get a big 31 JAN floating around the page when you logon?

Even the Echo are at it now!



31.3.13
Does anyone else get a big 31 JAN floating around the page when you logon? Even the Echo are at it now! 31.3.13 Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

saintlysoul wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
fcuk off you boring kunt...........
And what do you do for a living go on surprise me? Or shall I guess?
Fack off you boring snivelling skatecunt!
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]fcuk off you boring kunt...........[/p][/quote]And what do you do for a living go on surprise me? Or shall I guess?[/p][/quote]Fack off you boring snivelling skatecunt! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on! J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

8:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
No you're not. You're on here with your two signons, trying to have it all ways.

As Saintly..ah..sole, you've WHINED and WHINED and WHINED incessantly, claimed inside knowledge about how the money's run out, how NA and NC aren't talking and about how players land in NA's lap without him knowing a thing about it. All with no evidence, all tripe, and you know it.

As Bring back Branfoot you come on here and shout things that (I promise you) only YOU find hilariously funny. You've seen people like that in pubs and they are just tedious bores.

So, after all this deliberate effort to antagonise everyone, you've been found out to be a two-faced WUM.

And what happens? For the first time, EVER, you're claiming under both your signons (another giveaway) to want only to discuss football and how you're being bullied.

Well, you made your bed, fucktard, now go and lie in it.
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]No you're not. You're on here with your two signons, trying to have it all ways. As Saintly..ah..sole, you've WHINED and WHINED and WHINED incessantly, claimed inside knowledge about how the money's run out, how NA and NC aren't talking and about how players land in NA's lap without him knowing a thing about it. All with no evidence, all tripe, and you know it. As Bring back Branfoot you come on here and shout things that (I promise you) only YOU find hilariously funny. You've seen people like that in pubs and they are just tedious bores. So, after all this deliberate effort to antagonise everyone, you've been found out to be a two-faced WUM. And what happens? For the first time, EVER, you're claiming under both your signons (another giveaway) to want only to discuss football and how you're being bullied. Well, you made your bed, fucktard, now go and lie in it. Velleity
  • Score: 0

8:57pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Does anyone else get a big 31 JAN floating around the page when you logon?

Even the Echo are at it now!



31.3.13
31st of jan is also my eldest daughters 10th birthday ........ what a celebration it could be !
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Does anyone else get a big 31 JAN floating around the page when you logon? Even the Echo are at it now! 31.3.13[/p][/quote]31st of jan is also my eldest daughters 10th birthday ........ what a celebration it could be ! slugger
  • Score: 0

8:57pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
I'm CEO of a large service company turning over £8m and employing over 100 people. And you are?
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]I'm CEO of a large service company turning over £8m and employing over 100 people. And you are? Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

8:58pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintlysoul says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you! saintlysoul
  • Score: 0

8:58pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Admin calling; to the faraway few
When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do
Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss
It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost
Admin calling; now don’t look to us
Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing
Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Admin calling; to the imitation zone
Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone
Admin calling; to the zombies of death
The trust’s empty promises are all you have left
Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout
But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs
‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Now get this…
Admin calling; said were you there too?
When they said pack the park; was that all you could do?
Admin calling; in just a short while
And after all this, won’t you give me a smile
Admin calling …
Admin calling…
I never felt so much like like like...
The best yet ........ get it recorded !
For god's sake hire a decent singer....

...like me for instance! :O)
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Admin calling; to the faraway few When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost Admin calling; now don’t look to us Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Admin calling; to the imitation zone Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone Admin calling; to the zombies of death The trust’s empty promises are all you have left Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs ‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Now get this… Admin calling; said were you there too? When they said pack the park; was that all you could do? Admin calling; in just a short while And after all this, won’t you give me a smile Admin calling … Admin calling… I never felt so much like like like...[/p][/quote]The best yet ........ get it recorded ![/p][/quote]For god's sake hire a decent singer.... ...like me for instance! :O) Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:04pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
tbf...he could be a surgeon...even surgeons can be skate kunts.
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]tbf...he could be a surgeon...even surgeons can be skate kunts. Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Admin calling; to the faraway few
When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do
Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss
It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost
Admin calling; now don’t look to us
Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing
Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Admin calling; to the imitation zone
Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone
Admin calling; to the zombies of death
The trust’s empty promises are all you have left
Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout
But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out
Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs
‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise
The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in
Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin
Liquidation, but I have no fear
‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton!
Now get this…
Admin calling; said were you there too?
When they said pack the park; was that all you could do?
Admin calling; in just a short while
And after all this, won’t you give me a smile
Admin calling …
Admin calling…
I never felt so much like like like...
The best yet ........ get it recorded !
For god's sake hire a decent singer....

...like me for instance! :O)
I'm on the vocals, I've been practicing!

You can do the catering.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Admin calling; to the faraway few When you don’t pay your bills, you know what they do Admin calling; when ‘Arry’s the boss It won’t be long ‘till you’re counting the cost Admin calling; now don’t look to us Balram Chanrai has bitten the dust Admin calling; say you ain’t got no swing Or anything else, ‘cause Birch sold everything The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Admin calling; to the imitation zone Turns out the fake sheik was only a clone Admin calling; to the zombies of death The trust’s empty promises are all you have left Admin calling; now I don’t want to shout But when that last goal went in, I saw you walking out Admin calling; say you ain’t got no highs ‘Cause you’re going down, and you’ll never rise The ice age is coming; the bank’s zooming in Meltdown expected, the squad’s getting thin Liquidation, but I have no fear ‘Cause Pompey are drowning and I – live in Southampton! Now get this… Admin calling; said were you there too? When they said pack the park; was that all you could do? Admin calling; in just a short while And after all this, won’t you give me a smile Admin calling … Admin calling… I never felt so much like like like...[/p][/quote]The best yet ........ get it recorded ![/p][/quote]For god's sake hire a decent singer.... ...like me for instance! :O)[/p][/quote]I'm on the vocals, I've been practicing! You can do the catering. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
After my invite to "talk football" BBB has ignored me ....... strange , or not so strange ?
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]After my invite to "talk football" BBB has ignored me ....... strange , or not so strange ? slugger
  • Score: 0

9:08pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
Ah.... Sturgeon......I thought there was something fishy about you.
If you can't relate to any of US why come on here?
Why not go and have a scrub or something less boring and leave US to relate to each other in peace
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]Ah.... Sturgeon......I thought there was something fishy about you. If you can't relate to any of US why come on here? Why not go and have a scrub or something less boring and leave US to relate to each other in peace J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

9:08pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

To be fair there's only one group that can decide how good this song is - but there's no one at home over there :(
To be fair there's only one group that can decide how good this song is - but there's no one at home over there :( Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:09pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
tbf...he could be a surgeon...even surgeons can be skate kunts.
Perhaps he's a sturgeon ?
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]tbf...he could be a surgeon...even surgeons can be skate kunts.[/p][/quote]Perhaps he's a sturgeon ? slugger
  • Score: 0

9:11pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
After my invite to "talk football" BBB has ignored me ....... strange , or not so strange ?
He's logged on as arsehole at the moment, you'll have to wait.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]After my invite to "talk football" BBB has ignored me ....... strange , or not so strange ?[/p][/quote]He's logged on as arsehole at the moment, you'll have to wait. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:11pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
Ah.... Sturgeon......I thought there was something fishy about you.
If you can't relate to any of US why come on here?
Why not go and have a scrub or something less boring and leave US to relate to each other in peace
Great minds ....... lol
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]Ah.... Sturgeon......I thought there was something fishy about you. If you can't relate to any of US why come on here? Why not go and have a scrub or something less boring and leave US to relate to each other in peace[/p][/quote]Great minds ....... lol slugger
  • Score: 0

9:12pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

slugger wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
tbf...he could be a surgeon...even surgeons can be skate kunts.
Perhaps he's a sturgeon ?
Is that a posh type of skate?
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]tbf...he could be a surgeon...even surgeons can be skate kunts.[/p][/quote]Perhaps he's a sturgeon ?[/p][/quote]Is that a posh type of skate? Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:13pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Rob The Saint NOT in NZ says...

saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
Tree surgeon I hope.

If not, God help us if any of us are going under the knife with you in theatre.

With such arrogance & smugness on display we'd literally be lucky to get out alive.

Nurse!
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]Tree surgeon I hope. If not, God help us if any of us are going under the knife with you in theatre. With such arrogance & smugness on display we'd literally be lucky to get out alive. Nurse! Rob The Saint NOT in NZ
  • Score: 0

9:16pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Rob The Saint NOT in NZ wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
Tree surgeon I hope.

If not, God help us if any of us are going under the knife with you in theatre.

With such arrogance & smugness on display we'd literally be lucky to get out alive.

Nurse!
He's what I like to call a skate kunt, or as the kids of today say - skunt!
[quote][p][bold]Rob The Saint NOT in NZ[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]Tree surgeon I hope. If not, God help us if any of us are going under the knife with you in theatre. With such arrogance & smugness on display we'd literally be lucky to get out alive. Nurse![/p][/quote]He's what I like to call a skate kunt, or as the kids of today say - skunt! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:17pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

A Surgeon? Jesus do me a favour!!

I am laughing out aloud here

Let me guess you play Golf with a Director of the club hence all your inside knowledge .....

Please, you could be a Tree Surgeon I suppose ......
A Surgeon? Jesus do me a favour!! I am laughing out aloud here Let me guess you play Golf with a Director of the club hence all your inside knowledge ..... Please, you could be a Tree Surgeon I suppose ...... Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

9:18pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

STOP QUOTING!!!!

Start again.
STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again. Velleity
  • Score: 0

9:19pm Thu 17 Jan 13

OSPREYSAINT says...

saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
Cross out Hippocratic Oath, enter hypocritical oaf. Couldn't resist it.
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]Cross out Hippocratic Oath, enter hypocritical oaf. Couldn't resist it. OSPREYSAINT
  • Score: 0

9:19pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Velleity wrote:
STOP QUOTING!!!!

Start again.
No!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.[/p][/quote]No! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:20pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

It does make me smile when the wums call us names (happy clappers is a personal favorite) ........ they know we all support our club and will try any angle to undermine that support ......... i take it as a compliment and so should we all ...... COYR !!!
It does make me smile when the wums call us names (happy clappers is a personal favorite) ........ they know we all support our club and will try any angle to undermine that support ......... i take it as a compliment and so should we all ...... COYR !!! slugger
  • Score: 0

9:21pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Ospers! Welcome back.
Ospers! Welcome back. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:24pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

Superb entertainment tonight...not quite on the scale of a Saints display of course...

...more on the scale of Pompey losing again.

Like I said....superb! :O)
Superb entertainment tonight...not quite on the scale of a Saints display of course... ...more on the scale of Pompey losing again. Like I said....superb! :O) Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:26pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

slugger wrote:
It does make me smile when the wums call us names (happy clappers is a personal favorite) ........ they know we all support our club and will try any angle to undermine that support ......... i take it as a compliment and so should we all ...... COYR !!!
Its why Slugger our mate (BBB / Saintly Sole as I call him cos he is a flat fish really) isn't who he claims to be

You see, being a Surgeon although in charge he would, in fact, also be reliant on TEAMwork, DIFFERING views as he discusses the way to help Patients

The fact that he can't accept this shows, that like everything else, he is a Sad WUM

So here is yor new name Saintly SOLE- bye bye Fishface
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: It does make me smile when the wums call us names (happy clappers is a personal favorite) ........ they know we all support our club and will try any angle to undermine that support ......... i take it as a compliment and so should we all ...... COYR !!![/p][/quote]Its why Slugger our mate (BBB / Saintly Sole as I call him cos he is a flat fish really) isn't who he claims to be You see, being a Surgeon although in charge he would, in fact, also be reliant on TEAMwork, DIFFERING views as he discusses the way to help Patients The fact that he can't accept this shows, that like everything else, he is a Sad WUM So here is yor new name Saintly SOLE- bye bye Fishface Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

9:28pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

I miss Kent.
I miss Kent. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:31pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
Telescopic sight required ?
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]Telescopic sight required ? slugger
  • Score: 0

9:32pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
J7 wouldn't have missed Kent.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]J7 wouldn't have missed Kent. Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:33pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
Telescopic sight required ?
Nah, good old bricks and gas, can't beat em!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]Telescopic sight required ?[/p][/quote]Nah, good old bricks and gas, can't beat em! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:33pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Taunton Saint says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
I have to be fair I do think Kent was a different Troll to BBB & Saintly Sole

Kent couldn't string more than 3 words together, at least BBB/SS can type

As with all Skates what they type is rubbish, unfunny and pathetic
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]I have to be fair I do think Kent was a different Troll to BBB & Saintly Sole Kent couldn't string more than 3 words together, at least BBB/SS can type As with all Skates what they type is rubbish, unfunny and pathetic Taunton Saint
  • Score: 0

9:34pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Velleity wrote:
STOP QUOTING!!!!

Start again.
No!
Yes!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.[/p][/quote]No![/p][/quote]Yes! Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:34pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

First verse needs no changing - too perfect for words. There's one line may need a little work, though - you may be able to spot it.

-----------------

Born down in a dead man town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
Till you spend half your life just covering up

Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey
I was born in Pompey, born in Pompey

Got in a financial jam
So they put a trust pledge in my hand
But I’d paid it all to a Gay-dam-ak
Who blew it all in a bizarre financial structure that hid his involvement almost completely from creditors but left the club in financial ruin and somehow owing him money

Born in Pompey..

Come back home to Fratton Park
The lights were off it was all dark
Went down to see my PST man
He said son, don't you understand?
Born in Pompey..

I had a saviour name of Chan-er-ai
All he did was lie and lie
The trust is there, he's all gone..gone..gone

I had a sister I shagged in a barn
I got a picture of her in her uncle’s arms

Down in the shadow of Fratton P
With the scooter lady still smelling of wee
We’re ten years losing down the road
Ryman league, ain’t got nowhere to go

Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey
Born in Pompey, I'm a sister shaggin’ daddy in Pompey
Born in Pompey, born in Pompey
Born in Pompey, I'm a skint skunt daddy in Pompey
First verse needs no changing - too perfect for words. There's one line may need a little work, though - you may be able to spot it. ----------------- Born down in a dead man town The first kick I took was when I hit the ground You end up like a dog that's been beat too much Till you spend half your life just covering up Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey I was born in Pompey, born in Pompey Got in a financial jam So they put a trust pledge in my hand But I’d paid it all to a Gay-dam-ak Who blew it all in a bizarre financial structure that hid his involvement almost completely from creditors but left the club in financial ruin and somehow owing him money Born in Pompey.. Come back home to Fratton Park The lights were off it was all dark Went down to see my PST man He said son, don't you understand? Born in Pompey.. I had a saviour name of Chan-er-ai All he did was lie and lie The trust is there, he's all gone..gone..gone I had a sister I shagged in a barn I got a picture of her in her uncle’s arms Down in the shadow of Fratton P With the scooter lady still smelling of wee We’re ten years losing down the road Ryman league, ain’t got nowhere to go Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey Born in Pompey, I'm a sister shaggin’ daddy in Pompey Born in Pompey, born in Pompey Born in Pompey, I'm a skint skunt daddy in Pompey Velleity
  • Score: 0

9:41pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Velleity wrote:
First verse needs no changing - too perfect for words. There's one line may need a little work, though - you may be able to spot it.

-----------------

Born down in a dead man town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
Till you spend half your life just covering up

Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey
I was born in Pompey, born in Pompey

Got in a financial jam
So they put a trust pledge in my hand
But I’d paid it all to a Gay-dam-ak
Who blew it all in a bizarre financial structure that hid his involvement almost completely from creditors but left the club in financial ruin and somehow owing him money

Born in Pompey..

Come back home to Fratton Park
The lights were off it was all dark
Went down to see my PST man
He said son, don't you understand?
Born in Pompey..

I had a saviour name of Chan-er-ai
All he did was lie and lie
The trust is there, he's all gone..gone..gone

I had a sister I shagged in a barn
I got a picture of her in her uncle’s arms

Down in the shadow of Fratton P
With the scooter lady still smelling of wee
We’re ten years losing down the road
Ryman league, ain’t got nowhere to go

Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey
Born in Pompey, I'm a sister shaggin’ daddy in Pompey
Born in Pompey, born in Pompey
Born in Pompey, I'm a skint skunt daddy in Pompey
I can't, all seems good to me?

By the way what happened to your not doing skate bashing stance !?! :)
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: First verse needs no changing - too perfect for words. There's one line may need a little work, though - you may be able to spot it. ----------------- Born down in a dead man town The first kick I took was when I hit the ground You end up like a dog that's been beat too much Till you spend half your life just covering up Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey I was born in Pompey, born in Pompey Got in a financial jam So they put a trust pledge in my hand But I’d paid it all to a Gay-dam-ak Who blew it all in a bizarre financial structure that hid his involvement almost completely from creditors but left the club in financial ruin and somehow owing him money Born in Pompey.. Come back home to Fratton Park The lights were off it was all dark Went down to see my PST man He said son, don't you understand? Born in Pompey.. I had a saviour name of Chan-er-ai All he did was lie and lie The trust is there, he's all gone..gone..gone I had a sister I shagged in a barn I got a picture of her in her uncle’s arms Down in the shadow of Fratton P With the scooter lady still smelling of wee We’re ten years losing down the road Ryman league, ain’t got nowhere to go Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey Born in Pompey, I'm a sister shaggin’ daddy in Pompey Born in Pompey, born in Pompey Born in Pompey, I'm a skint skunt daddy in Pompey[/p][/quote]I can't, all seems good to me? By the way what happened to your not doing skate bashing stance !?! :) Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

9:41pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintshorse101 says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Velleity wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.
No!
Yes!
might do
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.[/p][/quote]No![/p][/quote]Yes![/p][/quote]might do saintshorse101
  • Score: 0

9:43pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Spirit of 58 says...

saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
Last para: The perfect job description for Westwood or his chums then!
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]Last para: The perfect job description for Westwood or his chums then! Spirit of 58
  • Score: 0

9:44pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Forget about Tescos burgers, you should try their meatballs they are the dogs ****!...:o)
Forget about Tescos burgers, you should try their meatballs they are the dogs ****!...:o) J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

9:47pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

Crane driver required in Vauxhall area, must be prepared to work on a rotor...
Crane driver required in Vauxhall area, must be prepared to work on a rotor... J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

9:47pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Velleity wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.
No!
Yes!
might do
Why?
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.[/p][/quote]No![/p][/quote]Yes![/p][/quote]might do[/p][/quote]Why? Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

9:47pm Thu 17 Jan 13

mack chinnon says...

saintlysoul wrote:
J7junctionseven wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
slugger wrote:
saintlysoul wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Taunton Saint wrote:
BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal

Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue.

Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.
I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter.

I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically!
I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard.

Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity.

In case you've forgotten, here it is:

Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before.

Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt.


What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.
Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today.

I really do not know who bbb is.

On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge.

Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about !

All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!!
You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!!
Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?
Fack off you skate wum.
That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.
"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on!
I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you!
Sturgeon. Isnt that a fish
[quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintlysoul[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: BBB - face it mate ya sad, getting a kick coming on here, oh well, its your "life" pal Always willing to debate football with a fan of any team as I have said previously. It is obvious though you don't have a clue. Can't wait for some witty Yokel retort in response as I live in Taunton. Better get me smock on, drink my cider and chew some straw whilst I wait.[/p][/quote]I think you'll find I was debating last night. But Valarie starts calling, all the posters she thinks are negative, an offensive term. And to be honest I don't get personal, I'm just having a bit of fun. I was getting a fair bit of stick last night and loved the banter. I'm no angel, but I like debating with people who make actual points, even if I don't agree. Proof of this is that a couple of happy clappers actually changed my mind before Christmas about Nigel. I'm big enough to admit that getting rid of him before he's been given the entire season to put things right, would be stupid! And would be a better option at this point. I was not thinking logically![/p][/quote]I assume by "Valerie", you mean me. You use that name in both your signons, as saintly..ah..sole where you claim inside information and as Branfoot, where you're just a tedious loudmouthed fucktard. Oddly, I didn't make any comments about your arguments last night, just a point about your identity. In case you've forgotten, here it is: Saintly..ah..sole signed off during the Chelsea match just before Bring back Branfoot came online. Odd coincidence. He calls me "Valerie" in both signons and finally both saintly..ah..sole and BBB don't say, "rose tinted spectacles". They both say "rosé tinted spectacles". BBB did it in the Chelsea thread and ah..soul did it a day or two before. Saintly..ah..soul and Bring back Branfoot are the same person with two signons, without any shadow of a doubt. What a tragic life you must lead. I genuinely feel pity if this is as good as it gets for you.[/p][/quote]Valerie just to clarify one thing. Bring back Branfoot and I are separate individuals. I was on here last night when I posted that both Lambert and Ramirez were on the bench. Despite the retorts to that comment I was proved right. Slugger had the grace to acknowledge that. I signed off last night as I was on duty and had to go to work where I've been for the last 24 hours. I've not been on here today. I really do not know who bbb is. On a more serious note I was delighted with the result last night a fantastic achievement to come back from two down at Stamford Bridge. Everyone knows I have concerns about the saints and what goes on behind the scenes. I genuinely believe that NA is not being treated well. I believe NC does not talk to NA. NA s comment about new signings says it all I do not think he is involved in such decisions. I simply bring this to people's attention for comment and debate. I thought this was what this site was all about ! All I want to do is discuss and debate nowt else!!!!![/p][/quote]You were indeed right about Rickie and Gaston (not about JWP and a couple of others who i can't remember right now) ........ I love the banter on this site , it makes it interesting imo ........ Bringbackbranfoot is no more a saint than John Westwood (also imo) ....... COYR !!!![/p][/quote]Sorry what did I say about JWP? I thought I said he'd be on the bench? The banter on here is good. One thing I struggle with is why nobody is allowed to put anything on her that is critical of the saints without being subjected to abuse or accused of being a skate or WUM? Nothing in life is perfect surely we should see the good and bad in everything?[/p][/quote]Fack off you skate wum.[/p][/quote]That's what spoils this site this type of abuse. Is it necessary? You let yourself down responding like that. I'm a decent professional person having to deal with all types in my work. Your type ruin things. You have no idea how to behave. You probably have no job are drink and or drug dependent and contribute nothing to society draining the nhs and the legal aid fund wanting everything for nothing. You make life I difficult for others. Sad sad sad.[/p][/quote]"Decent professional person".......... Are you a male prostitute by any chance?....Give us clue so we can guess what you do, if that's not bang on![/p][/quote]I'm a surgeon that's probably why I can't relate to any of you![/p][/quote]Sturgeon. Isnt that a fish mack chinnon
  • Score: 0

9:49pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Rob The Saint NOT in NZ says...

Taunton Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
I have to be fair I do think Kent was a different Troll to BBB & Saintly Sole

Kent couldn't string more than 3 words together, at least BBB/SS can type

As with all Skates what they type is rubbish, unfunny and pathetic
The last I heard kent & lessglory were standing in the street somewhere in Skatesville looking up to the heavens as they'd heard there is going to be loads of white powder covering the streets soon.
[quote][p][bold]Taunton Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]I have to be fair I do think Kent was a different Troll to BBB & Saintly Sole Kent couldn't string more than 3 words together, at least BBB/SS can type As with all Skates what they type is rubbish, unfunny and pathetic[/p][/quote]The last I heard kent & lessglory were standing in the street somewhere in Skatesville looking up to the heavens as they'd heard there is going to be loads of white powder covering the streets soon. Rob The Saint NOT in NZ
  • Score: 0

9:52pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Velleity wrote:
First verse needs no changing - too perfect for words. There's one line may need a little work, though - you may be able to spot it.

-----------------

Born down in a dead man town
The first kick I took was when I hit the ground
You end up like a dog that's been beat too much
Till you spend half your life just covering up

Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey
I was born in Pompey, born in Pompey

Got in a financial jam
So they put a trust pledge in my hand
But I’d paid it all to a Gay-dam-ak
Who blew it all in a bizarre financial structure that hid his involvement almost completely from creditors but left the club in financial ruin and somehow owing him money

Born in Pompey..

Come back home to Fratton Park
The lights were off it was all dark
Went down to see my PST man
He said son, don't you understand?
Born in Pompey..

I had a saviour name of Chan-er-ai
All he did was lie and lie
The trust is there, he's all gone..gone..gone

I had a sister I shagged in a barn
I got a picture of her in her uncle’s arms

Down in the shadow of Fratton P
With the scooter lady still smelling of wee
We’re ten years losing down the road
Ryman league, ain’t got nowhere to go

Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey
Born in Pompey, I'm a sister shaggin’ daddy in Pompey
Born in Pompey, born in Pompey
Born in Pompey, I'm a skint skunt daddy in Pompey
I can't, all seems good to me?

By the way what happened to your not doing skate bashing stance !?! :)
I couldn't resist - I was listening to the wireless and on came Bruce: after the first verse I felt it wrote itself.

I also felt that an attack on BBB/ Saintly..ah..sole was worth the effort, so an anti-Pompey song seemed the right thing to do. Hurt him where he feels it.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: First verse needs no changing - too perfect for words. There's one line may need a little work, though - you may be able to spot it. ----------------- Born down in a dead man town The first kick I took was when I hit the ground You end up like a dog that's been beat too much Till you spend half your life just covering up Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey I was born in Pompey, born in Pompey Got in a financial jam So they put a trust pledge in my hand But I’d paid it all to a Gay-dam-ak Who blew it all in a bizarre financial structure that hid his involvement almost completely from creditors but left the club in financial ruin and somehow owing him money Born in Pompey.. Come back home to Fratton Park The lights were off it was all dark Went down to see my PST man He said son, don't you understand? Born in Pompey.. I had a saviour name of Chan-er-ai All he did was lie and lie The trust is there, he's all gone..gone..gone I had a sister I shagged in a barn I got a picture of her in her uncle’s arms Down in the shadow of Fratton P With the scooter lady still smelling of wee We’re ten years losing down the road Ryman league, ain’t got nowhere to go Born in Pompey, I was born in Pompey Born in Pompey, I'm a sister shaggin’ daddy in Pompey Born in Pompey, born in Pompey Born in Pompey, I'm a skint skunt daddy in Pompey[/p][/quote]I can't, all seems good to me? By the way what happened to your not doing skate bashing stance !?! :)[/p][/quote]I couldn't resist - I was listening to the wireless and on came Bruce: after the first verse I felt it wrote itself. I also felt that an attack on BBB/ Saintly..ah..sole was worth the effort, so an anti-Pompey song seemed the right thing to do. Hurt him where he feels it. Velleity
  • Score: 0

9:53pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintshorse101 says...

i take it loads of games will be called off this week with all this snow coming. remember when teams used to play in the snow? they used to just get the orange ball out! now they call it off on crowd safety grounds.
wonder if scunny will get their win, sorry force of habbit, game on. thats another game they wont play.
someone posted the other day that the fa wont let them go because its too much trouble sorting the league out, well all theyve got to do is press the delete button and they are gone!
i take it loads of games will be called off this week with all this snow coming. remember when teams used to play in the snow? they used to just get the orange ball out! now they call it off on crowd safety grounds. wonder if scunny will get their win, sorry force of habbit, game on. thats another game they wont play. someone posted the other day that the fa wont let them go because its too much trouble sorting the league out, well all theyve got to do is press the delete button and they are gone! saintshorse101
  • Score: 0

9:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

I've just finished with my cross eyed girlfriend....she was seeing someone else
I've just finished with my cross eyed girlfriend....she was seeing someone else J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

9:56pm Thu 17 Jan 13

J7junctionseven says...

I've just finished with my cross eyed girlfriend....she was seeing someone else
I've just finished with my cross eyed girlfriend....she was seeing someone else J7junctionseven
  • Score: 0

9:57pm Thu 17 Jan 13

mack chinnon says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Superb entertainment tonight...not quite on the scale of a Saints display of course...

...more on the scale of Pompey losing again.

Like I said....superb! :O)
Come on Scunny.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Superb entertainment tonight...not quite on the scale of a Saints display of course... ...more on the scale of Pompey losing again. Like I said....superb! :O)[/p][/quote]Come on Scunny. mack chinnon
  • Score: 0

10:01pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Velleity wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.
No!
Yes!
might do
Why?
What?
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: STOP QUOTING!!!! Start again.[/p][/quote]No![/p][/quote]Yes![/p][/quote]might do[/p][/quote]Why?[/p][/quote]What? Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

10:05pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Just watched Jasons' goal again on you tube ........... what a sublime lay off by gaston to put him in ! ......... i think we all missed that and it shows his real quality .
Just watched Jasons' goal again on you tube ........... what a sublime lay off by gaston to put him in ! ......... i think we all missed that and it shows his real quality . slugger
  • Score: 0

10:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
Kent has not responded since I informed him that his address is being tracked down!

I informed him that IF he never posted again we would not publish it...however my guys will find it if he or in the future any rude aggresive skunts turn up..
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]Kent has not responded since I informed him that his address is being tracked down! I informed him that IF he never posted again we would not publish it...however my guys will find it if he or in the future any rude aggresive skunts turn up.. warrens 76
  • Score: 0

10:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

angus mc coatup says...

J7junctionseven wrote:
I've just finished with my cross eyed girlfriend....she was seeing someone else
I'v just finished with my welly throwing champion girlfriend.....she was having a fling !
[quote][p][bold]J7junctionseven[/bold] wrote: I've just finished with my cross eyed girlfriend....she was seeing someone else[/p][/quote]I'v just finished with my welly throwing champion girlfriend.....she was having a fling ! angus mc coatup
  • Score: 0

10:07pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

I see the skunt squad is down to fourteen, coincidentally the same number of days left. Will it be thirteen tomorrow?

Remember you heard it here first!



13.1.13
I see the skunt squad is down to fourteen, coincidentally the same number of days left. Will it be thirteen tomorrow? Remember you heard it here first! 13.1.13 Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

10:09pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Velleity says...

I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song.

I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.
I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person. Velleity
  • Score: 0

10:11pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I miss Kent.
Kent has not responded since I informed him that his address is being tracked down!

I informed him that IF he never posted again we would not publish it...however my guys will find it if he or in the future any rude aggresive skunts turn up..
Good man. Your chaps need to get to work on The News, some very rude skunts there!
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I miss Kent.[/p][/quote]Kent has not responded since I informed him that his address is being tracked down! I informed him that IF he never posted again we would not publish it...however my guys will find it if he or in the future any rude aggresive skunts turn up..[/p][/quote]Good man. Your chaps need to get to work on The News, some very rude skunts there! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

10:15pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Baddesley Bill says...

Ok ok...I'll give this song album thing a go...

To the tune of Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here:


So, so you think you can tell
Fratton Park from Hell,
Blue shirt’s from pain.
Can you tell a fake sheik
From a Russian sat in jail?
A fantasy tale?
Do you think you can tell?

And did they get you to trade
Your heroes for gold?
Hot pies for cold peas?
Hot prospects for loanees?
Cold comfort for change?
And did you exchange
A walk on part in the Prem
For a League 2 role in a cage?

How I wish, how I wish you were here.
We're just a few lost skates
Swimming in a fish bowl,
Year after year,
Running over the same old ground.
What have we found?
The same old fears.
Wish you were here

First draft. Copyright pending.
Ok ok...I'll give this song album thing a go... To the tune of Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here: So, so you think you can tell Fratton Park from Hell, Blue shirt’s from pain. Can you tell a fake sheik From a Russian sat in jail? A fantasy tale? Do you think you can tell? And did they get you to trade Your heroes for gold? Hot pies for cold peas? Hot prospects for loanees? Cold comfort for change? And did you exchange A walk on part in the Prem For a League 2 role in a cage? How I wish, how I wish you were here. We're just a few lost skates Swimming in a fish bowl, Year after year, Running over the same old ground. What have we found? The same old fears. Wish you were here First draft. Copyright pending. Baddesley Bill
  • Score: 0

10:16pm Thu 17 Jan 13

OSPREYSAINT says...

No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out!
No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out! OSPREYSAINT
  • Score: 0

10:18pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Ok ok...I'll give this song album thing a go...

To the tune of Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here:


So, so you think you can tell
Fratton Park from Hell,
Blue shirt’s from pain.
Can you tell a fake sheik
From a Russian sat in jail?
A fantasy tale?
Do you think you can tell?

And did they get you to trade
Your heroes for gold?
Hot pies for cold peas?
Hot prospects for loanees?
Cold comfort for change?
And did you exchange
A walk on part in the Prem
For a League 2 role in a cage?

How I wish, how I wish you were here.
We're just a few lost skates
Swimming in a fish bowl,
Year after year,
Running over the same old ground.
What have we found?
The same old fears.
Wish you were here

First draft. Copyright pending.
Not bad for a first effort.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Ok ok...I'll give this song album thing a go... To the tune of Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here: So, so you think you can tell Fratton Park from Hell, Blue shirt’s from pain. Can you tell a fake sheik From a Russian sat in jail? A fantasy tale? Do you think you can tell? And did they get you to trade Your heroes for gold? Hot pies for cold peas? Hot prospects for loanees? Cold comfort for change? And did you exchange A walk on part in the Prem For a League 2 role in a cage? How I wish, how I wish you were here. We're just a few lost skates Swimming in a fish bowl, Year after year, Running over the same old ground. What have we found? The same old fears. Wish you were here First draft. Copyright pending.[/p][/quote]Not bad for a first effort. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

10:40pm Thu 17 Jan 13

saintshorse101 says...

Velleity wrote:
I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.
ive come to believe that seed is in fact a bad influence on us all, where as scooter/kenty/bbb/sa
intly are all just bad effluence!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.[/p][/quote]ive come to believe that seed is in fact a bad influence on us all, where as scooter/kenty/bbb/sa intly are all just bad effluence! saintshorse101
  • Score: 0

10:48pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.
ive come to believe that seed is in fact a bad influence on us all, where as scooter/kenty/bbb/sa

intly are all just bad effluence!
Seed is indeed a bad influence ........ but a fun one ! ...... as for the rest ... Pah !
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.[/p][/quote]ive come to believe that seed is in fact a bad influence on us all, where as scooter/kenty/bbb/sa intly are all just bad effluence![/p][/quote]Seed is indeed a bad influence ........ but a fun one ! ...... as for the rest ... Pah ! slugger
  • Score: 0

10:54pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

slugger wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.
ive come to believe that seed is in fact a bad influence on us all, where as scooter/kenty/bbb/sa


intly are all just bad effluence!
Seed is indeed a bad influence ........ but a fun one ! ...... as for the rest ... Pah !
skunts.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.[/p][/quote]ive come to believe that seed is in fact a bad influence on us all, where as scooter/kenty/bbb/sa intly are all just bad effluence![/p][/quote]Seed is indeed a bad influence ........ but a fun one ! ...... as for the rest ... Pah ![/p][/quote]skunts. Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

10:58pm Thu 17 Jan 13

angus mc coatup says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out!
ossy where you been,thought the skunts had kidnapped you.
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out![/p][/quote]ossy where you been,thought the skunts had kidnapped you. angus mc coatup
  • Score: 0

11:09pm Thu 17 Jan 13

OSPREYSAINT says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out!
ossy where you been,thought the skunts had kidnapped you.
Sulking!
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out![/p][/quote]ossy where you been,thought the skunts had kidnapped you.[/p][/quote]Sulking! OSPREYSAINT
  • Score: 0

11:12pm Thu 17 Jan 13

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Velleity wrote:
I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song.

I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.
'I had a sister I shagged in a barn'.

Pure poetry!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: I hope those of you who have met me know me well enough to believe me when I say I'm feeling guilty for that song. I blame Seed's influence. He's a bad person.[/p][/quote]'I had a sister I shagged in a barn'. Pure poetry! Seedhouse the Unrepentant
  • Score: 0

11:13pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

Don't let the basterds get you down mush , they're dancing their last dance , all be over soon ! :o)
Don't let the basterds get you down mush , they're dancing their last dance , all be over soon ! :o) slugger
  • Score: 0

11:16pm Thu 17 Jan 13

angus mc coatup says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out!
ossy where you been,thought the skunts had kidnapped you.
Sulking!
there's room for everyone's opinion
( skunt wum's excluded ) don't be shy mush.
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: No source quoted, ala MGRA, but an ITK is hinting that there will be a Press Call tomorrow, hopefully the Forren anouncement, one way or the other. If it doesn't get snowed out![/p][/quote]ossy where you been,thought the skunts had kidnapped you.[/p][/quote]Sulking![/p][/quote]there's room for everyone's opinion ( skunt wum's excluded ) don't be shy mush. angus mc coatup
  • Score: 0

11:18pm Thu 17 Jan 13

OSPREYSAINT says...

Did you see the tripe on the Match thread? i.e. "Nicole23 wrote:
I swear all the posters on here with Saint in their name like ospreysaint saintlyrsoul, norwegiansaint are all Skates. Thats how messed up this site is Ive had enough of it, all you do is slag people off on here, your probably all obese as well and bald." ....... and that other troll, tangowebb or whatever, which of our notorious mongs was that. That's why I refuse to post, there is no sense in being sensible when you have to tolerate that kind of rubbish.
Did you see the tripe on the Match thread? i.e. "Nicole23 wrote: I swear all the posters on here with Saint in their name like ospreysaint saintlyrsoul, norwegiansaint are all Skates. Thats how messed up this site is Ive had enough of it, all you do is slag people off on here, your probably all obese as well and bald." ....... and that other troll, tangowebb or whatever, which of our notorious mongs was that. That's why I refuse to post, there is no sense in being sensible when you have to tolerate that kind of rubbish. OSPREYSAINT
  • Score: 0

11:22pm Thu 17 Jan 13

slugger says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Did you see the tripe on the Match thread? i.e. "Nicole23 wrote:
I swear all the posters on here with Saint in their name like ospreysaint saintlyrsoul, norwegiansaint are all Skates. Thats how messed up this site is Ive had enough of it, all you do is slag people off on here, your probably all obese as well and bald." ....... and that other troll, tangowebb or whatever, which of our notorious mongs was that. That's why I refuse to post, there is no sense in being sensible when you have to tolerate that kind of rubbish.
Just ignore it mate , if only one person gets chased off then they have a victory ....... do you want them to win ?
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: Did you see the tripe on the Match thread? i.e. "Nicole23 wrote: I swear all the posters on here with Saint in their name like ospreysaint saintlyrsoul, norwegiansaint are all Skates. Thats how messed up this site is Ive had enough of it, all you do is slag people off on here, your probably all obese as well and bald." ....... and that other troll, tangowebb or whatever, which of our notorious mongs was that. That's why I refuse to post, there is no sense in being sensible when you have to tolerate that kind of rubbish.[/p][/quote]Just ignore it mate , if only one person gets chased off then they have a victory ....... do you want them to win ? slugger
  • Score: 0