Nato special forces have intercepted a large shipment of Iranian-made arms destined for Taliban insurgents fighting British troops in Afghanistan's Helmand province.
The haul included a number of deadly "explosively-formed projectiles" used in roadside ambushes and capable of penetrating even tank armour.
The shipment is the third seized this year. Two smaller convoys carrying weapons from Iran were seized in Helmand in April and May.
A Nato source said yesterday that "Western special forces" had interdicted the arms in Farah province, a vast desert area which is sparsely inhabited and poorly policed.
He added: "The Taliban are obviously trying to vary their routes after losing their last two supply convoys. This interception was intelligence-led.
"It was size of the shipment that has grabbed our undivided attention this time round. The insurgents were obviously planning a major offensive at some point or trying to stock up in a single throw for a longer campaign."
The Taliban have lost an estimated 3000 fighters in battles with British, Dutch, Canadian and US troops this year.
Nato sources said that, while the hardline insurgents were still prepared to tackle allied forces in conventional ambushes, it was clear that the organisation's leaders were shifting the emphasis to more indirect action.
While Britain and the Afghan government have played down accusations that the Iranian government is directly involved in smuggling arms across the border, the US has publicly accused Tehran of complicity in terrorism in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
Military sources say the likely sources of arms are Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, a 120,000-strong organisation which answers to the country's ruling clerics rather than its high command, or powerful drug smugglers who want to prevent Nato from interfering with their opium supplies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article