CHARITIES received a record (pounds) 7.3bn in donations last year even though a third of people still give nothing.
Despite economic uncertainty, the average monthly donation rose by 4% in 2002 to (pounds) 12.93, with women giving an average of (pounds) 13.57 a month, more than (pounds) 1 higher than men's donations while generally earning less.
The figures were released by the Charities Aid Foundation and the National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
At the same time as the rise, the proportion of people giving money to charity fell slightly to 67.3% from 68.5% the previous year.
Only 7.6% of people gave more than (pounds) 50 a month, but despite this they accounted for more than 60% of the total donated during the year. The groups said an increase in people donating on a regular basis through direct debits, which now account for more than 15% of the total, had helped to prevent a stagnation in the amount given.
However, giving money to street collectors is still the most popular way to donate, with one in five people making a contribution in this way.
Medical research charities remain the most popular causes, with 24% contributing to them, followed by organisations for children and young people, backed by 20.5%.
Stuart Etherington, chief executive of the NCVO, said: ''British donors have shown themselves to be a resilient lot who, despite gloomy forecasts and widespread concerns about consumer finance, have just kept on giving.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article