Send pictures to us
Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
Blackpool end Saints good form
3:10pm Saturday 30th August 2008
Comments (127) Have your say »
Saints saw their good recent form abruptly ended as they lost 1-0 to Blackpool at St Mary's.
After two wins in a row Saints were in buoyant mood coming into the lunchtime game in which there were plenty of chances for both sides.
But in the end Ben Burgess' penalty just before half time proved to be the difference between the sides and left Saints with just three points to show for their opening four league matches.
It took less than a minute for the first effort at goal but David Fox's half volley from 25 yards out went wide.
Blackpool had a great chance to take the lead on five minutes when Shaun Barker's long throw from the right picked out the run of Ian Evatt. He was unmarked but from six yards out he steered his diving header wide.
Saints were really getting stretched by Blackpool and conceded two more chances in quick succession.
First Steve Kabba charged thorough on goal but was stopped as he was about to pull the trigger by a brilliant sliding tackle by Andrew Surman.
Then Adam Hammill picked up the loose ball and crossed to the far post where Ben Burgess slid in but couldn't make a clean enough connection to turn home from close range.
The game was really fizzing with both sides breaking quickly and getting men up to support their lone strikers.
Saints created a first good opening of their own on 13 minutes when a blocked shot came out to Adam Lallana who hit the target with a sidefooted shot which beat the keeper but not Rob Edwards back on the line.
Incredibly just a minute later there was almost a carbon copy as Lallana, this time at the back post, saw his shot beat everybody but Ian Evatt on the line.
Bizarrely referee Andre Mariner had to speak to Blackpool teammates Mo Camara and Kabba after they had a blazing row with each other.
Saints were still looking shaky at the back and had Kelvin Davis to thank for keeping out Gary Taylor-Fletcher's low near post effort which came as a result of a simple flick-on from a throw.
Simon Gillet tired an effort from distance on 26 minutes and though it looked a comfortable height Paul Rachubka took no chances because of the pace of it and decided to turn it behind.
Surman became the first player in the book two minutes for a late sliding tackle straight through Taylor-Fletcher before Holmes fired just over the bar.
Blackpool weren't happy when Jamie White caught Rachubka as he came out to slide and clear to stop the Saints man getting through but the referee deemed it a fair challenge.
David McGoldrick was looking to get shots off at every opportunity and got one on target on 41 minutes.
Ben Burgess had inadvertently played him through, McGoldrick cut back inside and from 20 yards unleashed an effort that Rachubka had to tip over.
Gillett became the second Saints players in the book for a foul on Edwards.
Just before half time disaster struck as Saints conceded a penalty.
Taylor-Fletcher chased out the far side of the area after a long corner and Gillett allowed him to turn back and as he broke into the area he was tripped by White.
There was no doubt it was a spot kick and Burgess stepped up and sent Davis the wrong way to make it 1-0 at the break.
Saints made a half time change with White coming off for Nathan Dyer.
Davis was called into action just two minutes into the half as Fox fired off a stinging drive from 20 yards that the Saints keeper had to be strong to turn behind.
Saints were then troubled by a header from a corner which Davis turned onto the bar before he and the ball were bundled over the line by Kabba but a free kick was given for what a looked blatant foul on the Saints keeper.
Saints were being cut open time and again and had Hammill's lacklustre finishing to thank on 50 minutes for them not falling further behind.
Lloyd James pushed forward from right back and saw his low drive take a deflection to guide it wide as Saints tried to get back into their stride.
Dyer was at least starting to cause problems and put an effort over the bar on 58 minutes.
Lallana made it a hat-trick of shots off the line a minute later when he controlled and half volleyed but found Edwards again beyond Rachubka to clear.
James was the next man in the book for a foul on Hammill.
Blackpool thought they had doubled their lead on 62 minutes when Kabba bundled home from close range after Shaun Barker's header was cleared off the line and upwards by Dyer but the linesman's flag was already raised and it was ruled out.
Holmes threatened on 65 minutes but his low shot was saved by Rachubka.
Blackpool made their first switch on 68 minutes with David Vaughan replacing Hammill while Saints responded by bringing on Stern John and Paul Wotton for Morgan Schneiderlin and Simon Gillett.
Wotton and Lallana went into the holding midfield roles with McGoldrick in the hole and John up front.
Davis had to save at the near post two minutes later as Burgess drove in a half volley.
Blackpool had another goal ruled out on 71 minutes when Vaughan's shot was turned home by Kabba but he was offside.
John had a great chance when he met Holmes' left wing free kick but put his diving header from six yards out over the bar.
Blackpool came so close again on 74 minutes, this time Burgess shot across goal but Davis made a brilliant save to deflect onto the far post.
Blackpool made another change with nine minutes remaining with Zeshan Rehman placing Fox before Svensson went in the book.
Blackpool made a final change with four minutes left with Danny Coid on for Taylor-Fletcher.
In stoppage time McGoldrick had a sight of goal and fired past Rachubka but against the angle of post and bar. It proved to be the last chance and Saints were destined to go into the international break on the back of a disappointing defeat.
Your Say YourDaily Echo
Summary Saint, says...
3:30pm Sat 30 Aug 08
1. Svensson and Perry were like statues today and didn't even win much in the air. Whenever Blackpool ran at them, it was far too easy to get between them.
2. Blackpool could and should have had 4 or 5 goals.
3. We have no plan B
4. The players need to run at the opposition defence, not run across the front of them.
5. Gillet, Schnerdelin and White had very poor games.
6. Lloyd James is not a right back, never will be. We need to get in a dedicated right back with some muscle
7. Drew Surman is going backwards as a player. He looks totally unconnected with the rest of the team and I think he hates playing at left back.
8. Every CCC team in the country now knows we are soft in the air and at set pieces.
9. We can play some pretty football and it's nice to see, but it needs to be quicker and there needs to be an end product.
10. Not surprised by the low crowd today all things considered, but if all those super loyal positive fans were all there today, then why was the atmosphere so bad and negative as soon as the team went behind????????
2. Blackpool could and should have had 4 or 5 goals.
3. We have no plan B
4. The players need to run at the opposition defence, not run across the front of them.
5. Gillet, Schnerdelin and White had very poor games.
6. Lloyd James is not a right back, never will be. We need to get in a dedicated right back with some muscle
7. Drew Surman is going backwards as a player. He looks totally unconnected with the rest of the team and I think he hates playing at left back.
8. Every CCC team in the country now knows we are soft in the air and at set pieces.
9. We can play some pretty football and it's nice to see, but it needs to be quicker and there needs to be an end product.
10. Not surprised by the low crowd today all things considered, but if all those super loyal positive fans were all there today, then why was the atmosphere so bad and negative as soon as the team went behind????????
Steve, poole says...
3:40pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Summary Saint wrote:i totaly agree with evrythin u sed why not put cork into right back and i hope pekhart is a goal machine as we didnt look likely to score at all today. Lalana and dyer were the two best players on the pitch but even lalana should have had at least two goals
1. Svensson and Perry were like statues today and didn't even win much in the air. Whenever Blackpool ran at them, it was far too easy to get between them. 2. Blackpool could and should have had 4 or 5 goals. 3. We have no plan B 4. The players need to run at the opposition defence, not run across the front of them. 5. Gillet, Schnerdelin and White had very poor games. 6. Lloyd James is not a right back, never will be. We need to get in a dedicated right back with some muscle 7. Drew Surman is going backwards as a player. He looks totally unconnected with the rest of the team and I think he hates playing at left back. 8. Every CCC team in the country now knows we are soft in the air and at set pieces. 9. We can play some pretty football and it's nice to see, but it needs to be quicker and there needs to be an end product. 10. Not surprised by the low crowd today all things considered, but if all those super loyal positive fans were all there today, then why was the atmosphere so bad and negative as soon as the team went behind????????
DevonSaint, says...
3:46pm Sat 30 Aug 08
I think an evenely matched game which could have gone either way if it weren't for stupidly giving away a penalty.
Still confident, we can't win em all!
COYR!!!!
Still confident, we can't win em all!
COYR!!!!
Simon, says...
3:48pm Sat 30 Aug 08
So utterly predictable. 9 points dropped out of 12 is not promotion form.
JMARTIN, saudi says...
3:48pm Sat 30 Aug 08
NO PACE.
NO DEFENCE
NO STRIKE
WE WILL NEED 40 GOALS, AN AVERAGE TO STAY UP
CAN YOU TELL ME WERE THEY WILL COME FROM.?
NO DEFENCE
NO STRIKE
WE WILL NEED 40 GOALS, AN AVERAGE TO STAY UP
CAN YOU TELL ME WERE THEY WILL COME FROM.?
Keep The Spirit Alive, Southampton says...
3:51pm Sat 30 Aug 08
I also agree strongly with above 2 comments. There was no lack of urgency from any of the players. Im just curious and can someone answer me this. "Why does everyone want Stern John on all the time?" In my view as we all have our own opinions but i feel he dosnt do much for the team except just holds it up. He had a bag full of chances against Birmingham both games and one quality chance today, should have bagged them! I hope Pekhart is a goalscoring machine because we need goals, we have chances but never take them. And today, why do we try walking the ball in all the time :S :S.. Also, anyone heard anything about BWP lately? Hope someone can answer this comment! Cheers! Up The Saints! COYR! X
SFC NOT PLC, says...
3:55pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Cash starve Lowe/Wilde out of St Marys as let REAL Saints fans takeover. This club will never fold as there are a handful of people that would never allow it.
Lowe and judas mike are living in cuckoo land with what they are trying to do.
Its all PR spin on a daily basis with no substance and certainly not any of their own money ! AGAIN
We have just wasted £300,000 on wages on tony Pulis in what is a very bizarre signing.
We are skint are we not ?
Judas Mike Wilde OUT
Lowe and judas mike are living in cuckoo land with what they are trying to do.
Its all PR spin on a daily basis with no substance and certainly not any of their own money ! AGAIN
We have just wasted £300,000 on wages on tony Pulis in what is a very bizarre signing.
We are skint are we not ?
Judas Mike Wilde OUT
sailor sam, portsmouth says...
3:56pm Sat 30 Aug 08
A young team that worked hard and showed a lot of commitment.
I don't know the reason for the booing at the end of the match, but the team certainly did not deserve it.
I don't know the reason for the booing at the end of the match, but the team certainly did not deserve it.
the totton scrutineer, TOTTON says...
3:59pm Sat 30 Aug 08
A game too many for this team.At times they were good but not often enough and going a goal behind maent they were pushing too hard for the equaliser.Missed passes and panic play exposed them as what are a team of young inexperienced players.Jan should have had played the same team as Tueday with Stern John starting.But then hindsight is a wonderful thing,They will learn from this and I hope Jan will too.With 46 games a season he must rest his players and use the squad more
No1 saints fan, says...
4:06pm Sat 30 Aug 08
blimmy cheers for the postive comment, sam the skate sailor, u feeling ok
Ian, Southampton says...
4:09pm Sat 30 Aug 08
"Svensson and Perry were like statues today". Summary Saint has hit the nail on the head. The heart of the defence that played so well on Tuesday night was torn out and replaced by slow old-timers who were outpaced by an average attack. I think seeing their team-mates dropped also had demoralising effect on the rest of the young team. WHY change a winning team??? Jack Cork, especially, was very badly missed.
redhat, Southampton says...
4:14pm Sat 30 Aug 08
No1 saints fan wrote:In fairness,Sailor is always non biast and gives his honest opinion..to which i myself always find interesting to read...
blimmy cheers for the postive comment, sam the skate sailor, u feeling ok
Todays match - i feel the boys didnt give Blackpool enough respect before the game... we thought that this was in the bag before k.o.... which couldnt be further from the truth..at times we did play good football,but too many players had off days,in particular the whole back 4.. and we lack the firepower needed to really punish teams and take our chances more clinically... we now have a 2 week break,to get up and go again when we return away to Q.P.R ..then its 2 home games in 4 days... so lets see.
Todays attendance was a discgrace ... 15,000- yet Derby get 30,000 at home-having not won in over 36 games!!!!
thats loyalty!!! say what you will.
Lowe OUT, says...
4:16pm Sat 30 Aug 08
So then Mr Lowe your embarrasing PR offensive this week has now somewhat backfired.
Just why do you do it eh ??? LOL
Just why do you do it eh ??? LOL
steve, pole says...
4:19pm Sat 30 Aug 08
looks very much like we are going to sign romain gasmi. On the strasbourg website they have labled him as loaned to the saints. From the perfomance today i think we desperately need some players with a more attacking threat.
southseachris, southsea says...
4:21pm Sat 30 Aug 08
I did post a comment on Wednesday after the two wins suggesting everyone should keep their feet on the ground and wait to see how they performed against a team like Blackpool. Well now we know. Blackpool had a game plan which could have come unstuck in the first half but it worked, just like many visitors last season.
They got men behind the ball and, especially in the second half when they were a goal up, closed the midfield and made our passing game very difficult.
I like what JP is trying to do with the resources available but I believe too many people got carried away earlier in the week. I can see us playing better away from home where there may be more space but teams are quick to get wise to our style of play.
Realistically we're going to win a few and lose a few, however let's wait for 10 or so games and then we'll be able to see what the season may hold.
By the way, I was there and didn't here any booing at the end.
They got men behind the ball and, especially in the second half when they were a goal up, closed the midfield and made our passing game very difficult.
I like what JP is trying to do with the resources available but I believe too many people got carried away earlier in the week. I can see us playing better away from home where there may be more space but teams are quick to get wise to our style of play.
Realistically we're going to win a few and lose a few, however let's wait for 10 or so games and then we'll be able to see what the season may hold.
By the way, I was there and didn't here any booing at the end.
Ian, Southampton says...
4:21pm Sat 30 Aug 08
"Im just curious and can someone answer me this. "Why does everyone want Stern John on all the time?" In my view as we all have our own opinions but I feel he doesnt do much for the team except just holds it up." I certainly don't. He was our worst player when he came on as sub on Tuesday night. He always chests or heads the ball back towards his own goal, setting up breakaway attacks for the opposition. We needed another youngster to come on up front today: not John.
Summary Saint, says...
4:28pm Sat 30 Aug 08
the totton scrutineer wrote:Don't agree at all. Most of the team are youngsters and should be champing at the bit to play twice a week in the first team. It wasn't fitness we were lacking today, it was ideas and application and getting rid of silly mistakes.
A game too many for this team.At times they were good but not often enough and going a goal behind maent they were pushing too hard for the equaliser.Missed passes and panic play exposed them as what are a team of young inexperienced players.Jan should have had played the same team as Tueday with Stern John starting.But then hindsight is a wonderful thing,They will learn from this and I hope Jan will too.With 46 games a season he must rest his players and use the squad more
For a team that bases itself on possession football, we gave it away far too easily and gave Blackpool lots of obvious options to explore when they went forward.
I hope they do learn from this, but I feel all the other teams in the division will have learned a lot about our weaknesses and we do have a number (full backs, slow centre backs, set piece defending, lack of pace in midfield, lack of strength up front).
This is an unforgiving league. Today could have been a great platform to boost confidence in the team and fanbase alike and get the club on the up again, but in reality, we've lost badly at home to a poor team, many of the youngsters didn't perform and the two older players were a liability.
MikeC, Southampton says...
4:31pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Unfortunately ill-health meant I had to pass on ticket to my parter (West Ham fan but she supports the Saints more than some on this site) and watch the game on the box.
If you try to play a passing game there will be times when the passes don't come off. Last Tuesday almost every pass went to feet, today they didn't.
That doesn't mean there was any need for the shameful booing that - together with that ridiculous song about killing Portsmouth supporters - was all you could hear from Saints fans on the box. If this young team is to succeed they will need more support than they got today.
I agree with earlier posts that the defence last Tuesday looked much better than today - and that is down to the centre backs. Still, all in all this season looks like we can make progress after the utter rubbish we've endured for the last couple of years.
If you try to play a passing game there will be times when the passes don't come off. Last Tuesday almost every pass went to feet, today they didn't.
That doesn't mean there was any need for the shameful booing that - together with that ridiculous song about killing Portsmouth supporters - was all you could hear from Saints fans on the box. If this young team is to succeed they will need more support than they got today.
I agree with earlier posts that the defence last Tuesday looked much better than today - and that is down to the centre backs. Still, all in all this season looks like we can make progress after the utter rubbish we've endured for the last couple of years.
anne agram, says...
4:31pm Sat 30 Aug 08
steve wrote:i am in ****
looks very much like we are going to sign romain gasmi. On the strasbourg website they have labled him as loaned to the saints. From the perfomance today i think we desperately need some players with a more attacking threat.
anne agram, says...
4:32pm Sat 30 Aug 08
i am in orgasm
HAPPY CHAPPY, ON MY WAY TO PORTUGAL says...
4:38pm Sat 30 Aug 08
HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA IM SO HAPPY IM HAPPY CHAPPY HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA
BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE I DONT THINK SO DO YOU
EVERTON, WHO R YER WHO R YER WHO R YER
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE I DONT THINK SO DO YOU
EVERTON, WHO R YER WHO R YER WHO R YER
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
tobie, London says...
4:42pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Fickle F**kers aren't we all, we played much better football had loads of possesion and if mcgoldric could learn to keep his shots down and lallna shots up we would of won with ease so shut up and sing up. COYR!!!!
Matt Probert, Harefield says...
4:53pm Sat 30 Aug 08
If Saints hadn't tried cheating by tripping that Blackpool player it may have been a different result. Instead a penalty was awarded and a goal scored. About time professional players awoke to fair play, and started setting our children a good example. I'm off to watch pigs fly now.
tobie, London says...
4:55pm Sat 30 Aug 08
E Racing and the English club of Southampton concluded, this Friday afternoon, the loan d' one season with option d' purchase of Romain Gasmi. The young offensive medium formed with the Club thus joined the rows of the training of the Saints, directed by Jan Poortvliet, and boarder of Division One (L2 English). Currently in convalescence (fracture of the 5th métatarse), Romain Gasmi will remain however a few weeks still in Strasbourg to look after his wound there, before s' to fly away definitively for Great Britain. In Southampton, it will find a former boarder of the Training centre and Racing house. Morgan Schneiderlin, transferred this summer, is an indisputable holder in the eleven of the Saints.
HOw come we ain't heard this from are own site yet strasbourg have it down as a done deal?
HOw come we ain't heard this from are own site yet strasbourg have it down as a done deal?
me again, soton says...
4:57pm Sat 30 Aug 08
he he scum back where you belong lucky hampshire has the superPOMPEY to fly the flag scum you are a shambles and you call that support PLAY UP POMPEY
Ken Jeans, Highcliffe,Dorset says...
4:58pm Sat 30 Aug 08
After Tues oh dear I am afraid Svenson & Perry were caught for pace,Gillet hampered by poor ref's booking,and McGoldrick out of ideas.Dyer lived up to his name lets hope the new boys can turn it round,IT'S NOT A BAD TEAM just need a bit of help.I didn't boo but felt a bit dissappointed COYR
on my soapbox!!!, says...
5:01pm Sat 30 Aug 08
HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA IM SO HAPPY IM HAPPY CHAPPY HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA
BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE I DONT THINK SO DO YOU
EVERTON, WHO R YER WHO R YER WHO R YER
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
nice to see such a dedicated pompey fan turn up 3 weeks into our season. im intrigued to know where you were after your first two games? crying perhaps? and what could your club d without such a dedicated supporter? not at the game today? why does that not shock me? you are so predictable its laughable.
BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE I DONT THINK SO DO YOU
EVERTON, WHO R YER WHO R YER WHO R YER
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
nice to see such a dedicated pompey fan turn up 3 weeks into our season. im intrigued to know where you were after your first two games? crying perhaps? and what could your club d without such a dedicated supporter? not at the game today? why does that not shock me? you are so predictable its laughable.
Saintly, says...
5:07pm Sat 30 Aug 08
The curse of Sky Sports has returned, and it probably won't get any better as our next game away to QPR is also on Sky - God help us!
about time, soton says...
5:39pm Sat 30 Aug 08
redhat wrote:is it any suprise when an adult and two kids cost as much as most peoples weekly shopping?to watch that SH** if i wanted to watch kids ill pop the park and watch some tyro games,till mr lowe and co realise they are pricing people out of the game this attendance wont get any better.
No1 saints fan wrote:In fairness,Sailor is always non biast and gives his honest opinion..to which i myself always find interesting to read...
blimmy cheers for the postive comment, sam the skate sailor, u feeling ok
Todays match - i feel the boys didnt give Blackpool enough respect before the game... we thought that this was in the bag before k.o.... which couldnt be further from the truth..at times we did play good football,but too many players had off days,in particular the whole back 4.. and we lack the firepower needed to really punish teams and take our chances more clinically... we now have a 2 week break,to get up and go again when we return away to Q.P.R ..then its 2 home games in 4 days... so lets see.
Todays attendance was a discgrace ... 15,000- yet Derby get 30,000 at home-having not won in over 36 games!!!!
thats loyalty!!! say what you will.
Shazza, says...
5:40pm Sat 30 Aug 08
So has everyones baloon busrt a little?
Whilst I thought we were far better in the first half, WE NEVER SCORED!!! This is a harsh old league, all these supporters coming on here suggesting we are going to walk this league after TWO LEAGUE GAMES are living ina dream world.
Blackpool are a classic championship team and we will face far more like them this season.
It WILL be a hard long slog, hopefully something that these lads are up to.
Whilst I thought we were far better in the first half, WE NEVER SCORED!!! This is a harsh old league, all these supporters coming on here suggesting we are going to walk this league after TWO LEAGUE GAMES are living ina dream world.
Blackpool are a classic championship team and we will face far more like them this season.
It WILL be a hard long slog, hopefully something that these lads are up to.
Saints Foreverrrr!, Southampton says...
5:55pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Does Anyone Know Whats Happened With BWP And Pekhart? Someone Answer This If They Know Please!
StMark, says...
6:06pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Simon wrote:I think expectations are sometimes too high. We were never going to go from nearly-relegated to promoted in 5 minutes!
So utterly predictable. 9 points dropped out of 12 is not promotion form.
steveyot, harefield says...
6:10pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Romain GASMI (prêté à Southampton, Ang.)
confirmed from Strasbourg website, might be a good lesson for the Saints today....feet back on the ground and realistic expectations. They will all learn from the experience. COYS
confirmed from Strasbourg website, might be a good lesson for the Saints today....feet back on the ground and realistic expectations. They will all learn from the experience. COYS
StMark, says...
6:12pm Sat 30 Aug 08
about time wrote:Actually, Derby's tickets are more expensive than ours!
redhat wrote:is it any suprise when an adult and two kids cost as much as most peoples weekly shopping?to watch that SH** if i wanted to watch kids ill pop the park and watch some tyro games,till mr lowe and co realise they are pricing people out of the game this attendance wont get any better.
No1 saints fan wrote:In fairness,Sailor is always non biast and gives his honest opinion..to which i myself always find interesting to read...
blimmy cheers for the postive comment, sam the skate sailor, u feeling ok
Todays match - i feel the boys didnt give Blackpool enough respect before the game... we thought that this was in the bag before k.o.... which couldnt be further from the truth..at times we did play good football,but too many players had off days,in particular the whole back 4.. and we lack the firepower needed to really punish teams and take our chances more clinically... we now have a 2 week break,to get up and go again when we return away to Q.P.R ..then its 2 home games in 4 days... so lets see.
Todays attendance was a discgrace ... 15,000- yet Derby get 30,000 at home-having not won in over 36 games!!!!
thats loyalty!!! say what you will.
david, says...
6:20pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Lowe OUT wrote:another bed-wetting fake saints thats obviously pleased we have lost push off and support pompey you loser
So then Mr Lowe your embarrasing PR offensive this week has now somewhat backfired.
Just why do you do it eh ??? LOL
HAPPY CHAPPY, ON MY WAY TO PORTUGAL says...
6:25pm Sat 30 Aug 08
on my soapbox!!! wrote:See you got home quick from St FAIRIES !
HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA IM SO HAPPY IM HAPPY CHAPPY HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE I DONT THINK SO DO YOU EVERTON, WHO R YER WHO R YER WHO R YER LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT nice to see such a dedicated pompey fan turn up 3 weeks into our season. im intrigued to know where you were after your first two games? crying perhaps? and what could your club d without such a dedicated supporter? not at the game today? why does that not shock me? you are so predictable its laughable.
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Fran, says...
6:37pm Sat 30 Aug 08
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Oi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly??
on my soapbox!!! wrote: HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA IM SO HAPPY IM HAPPY CHAPPY HE HE HE HE HA HA HA HA HE HE HE HE HA HA HA BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE I DONT THINK SO DO YOU EVERTON, WHO R YER WHO R YER WHO R YER LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT nice to see such a dedicated pompey fan turn up 3 weeks into our season. im intrigued to know where you were after your first two games? crying perhaps? and what could your club d without such a dedicated supporter? not at the game today? why does that not shock me? you are so predictable its laughable.See you got home quick from St FAIRIES ! LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Ha ha ha
lovinit lovinit lovinit
Condor Man, Southampton says...
6:42pm Sat 30 Aug 08
it's not doom and gloom but I was worried that Svensson was very poor today. I'd like to see Jack Cork alongside Perry at the back.
Dyer looked totally out of touch with the movement of the side, the second half was a throw back to last season.
Dyer looked totally out of touch with the movement of the side, the second half was a throw back to last season.
about time, soton says...
7:11pm Sat 30 Aug 08
StMark wrote:wtf has derbys ticket prices got to do with anything???????????
about time wrote:Actually, Derby's tickets are more expensive than ours!
redhat wrote:is it any suprise when an adult and two kids cost as much as most peoples weekly shopping?to watch that SH** if i wanted to watch kids ill pop the park and watch some tyro games,till mr lowe and co realise they are pricing people out of the game this attendance wont get any better.
No1 saints fan wrote:In fairness,Sailor is always non biast and gives his honest opinion..to which i myself always find interesting to read...
blimmy cheers for the postive comment, sam the skate sailor, u feeling ok
Todays match - i feel the boys didnt give Blackpool enough respect before the game... we thought that this was in the bag before k.o.... which couldnt be further from the truth..at times we did play good football,but too many players had off days,in particular the whole back 4.. and we lack the firepower needed to really punish teams and take our chances more clinically... we now have a 2 week break,to get up and go again when we return away to Q.P.R ..then its 2 home games in 4 days... so lets see.
Todays attendance was a discgrace ... 15,000- yet Derby get 30,000 at home-having not won in over 36 games!!!!
thats loyalty!!! say what you will.
Doctor Saint, Hedge End says...
7:11pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Condor Man wrote:This is out fourth year in this league and it is obvious that it's full of big defenders, midfielders and forwards. Svensson was outjumped a lot today, but Perry isn't big enough when we have so little other height on the pitch. Without Svensson, the kids would be rudderless. Get Cork next to him at the back and keep the faith. White isn't up to it yet, so give Dyer a bit more of a chance.
it's not doom and gloom but I was worried that Svensson was very poor today. I'd like to see Jack Cork alongside Perry at the back. Dyer looked totally out of touch with the movement of the side, the second half was a throw back to last season.
In a nutshell, says...
7:12pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Losing at home to Blackpool and failing to score is a very bad result.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
7:23pm Sat 30 Aug 08
SFC NOT PLC wrote:I guess that the 'handful of people' that you are talking about, are the ones that turned up today.
Cash starve Lowe/Wilde out of St Marys as let REAL Saints fans takeover. This club will never fold as there are a handful of people that would never allow it. Lowe and judas mike are living in cuckoo land with what they are trying to do. Its all PR spin on a daily basis with no substance and certainly not any of their own money ! AGAIN We have just wasted £300,000 on wages on tony Pulis in what is a very bizarre signing. We are skint are we not ? Judas Mike Wilde OUT
How much money do you think that they could muster to, not just buy the club, but raise a few million quid to buy players?
You have the temerity to say that Lowe and Wilde are living in cuckoo land! Something tells me that you are already in residence.
SAINT STEVE, SOUTHAMPTON says...
7:40pm Sat 30 Aug 08
4 league games. 3 loses. 1 win. Not good form really. Jan's got his head screwed on though & knows what went wrong. I agree that we were trying to make one pass too many, need to be more deadly in the box. Three games in one week was just a little bit too much for some of the kids today. Blackpool didn't have a midweek game & it showed today. We still should of at least got a draw. I think JP should have played the team that beat Birmingham & had Pekhart on he bench too in my opinion.
saint steve, SOUTHAMPTON says...
7:41pm Sat 30 Aug 08
4 league games. 3 loses. 1 win. Not good form really. Jan's got his head screwed on though & knows what went wrong. I agree that we were trying to make one pass too many, need to be more deadly in the box. Three games in one week was just a little bit too much for some of the kids today. Blackpool didn't have a midweek game & it showed today. We still should of at least got a draw. I think JP should have played the team that beat Birmingham & had Pekhart on he bench too in my opinion.
JP's Red and White army, The Chapel stand says...
7:55pm Sat 30 Aug 08
As has been said elsewhere here, Dyer's control was......well dire, every time he got the ball a lack of control left the ball too far in front of him when he was in good positions, the game passed us by for the most part especially in the 2nd half when we were chasing the game looking for an equaliser, the ref was also shocking and he was quick to book our players when the cards stayed in his pocket when Blackpool players used time wasting tactics to there advantage to close out the game and fustrate us. Jan has to look at this as im sure most clubs who come here will now know what out weaknesses are and will expliot them if we can't learn to adapt. he has 2 weeks now to get the players sorted out for QPR, we will need to learn some quick lessons for that one!!! COYR!!
DJI, disappointed but hopeful says...
8:18pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Today, we played a typical Championship side and it exposed our weaknesses to all given that it was televised. Blackpool were like a poor Bristol City in their style of play, which does not bode well. I do however, believe that JP will make the changes and teach the lessons needed from this so we are not so exposed again.
I missed the first 20 minutes as I was stuck in the jam on the M3 so got to see a reasonable first half. But in the second half we appeared more like last season's team; lacking in precision, movement and goal scoring attempts. Consider that Blackpool scored 4 times, 3 disallowed for offside and we didn't even having any attempts to be disallowed.
I agree with the many who say we should have played the same team we fielded against B'ham. Jack Cork has pace and was good in the air and on the floor and (surprisingly) Thomas was very steady too. I would also have put Pekhart on the bench today as we needed some pace and height up front. JP admitted in one interview that the players were tired so he should have rested them and gone for the points with his other winning team, especially going in to a two week break and then having to come back to face QPR away. Momentum is what is needed and progression.
I have loved watching this new team play in all the pre-season and home games so far but I have a concern. If we are to play like Arsenal (comment from JP in the press) then we have a problem. Everyone knows that to suppress Arsenal, you simply flood the midfield to stop them passing and go long when you can. When that happens, Arsenal have always struggled to get anything from their games in the past few seasons. What we need is a plan 'B' which I note JP is saying today. Simpler football, shoot earlier and some early goals. then we can relax and play our pretty football in the 2nd half. Play like that and our rivals will not be able to cope. The lesson here is play toe-to-toe CCC games at SMS in the first half, and keep the 'total football' for the 2nd half and away matches.
I am still very optimistic that we will do well this season and adapt our game tactics to becoming a winning team more regularly.
I missed the first 20 minutes as I was stuck in the jam on the M3 so got to see a reasonable first half. But in the second half we appeared more like last season's team; lacking in precision, movement and goal scoring attempts. Consider that Blackpool scored 4 times, 3 disallowed for offside and we didn't even having any attempts to be disallowed.
I agree with the many who say we should have played the same team we fielded against B'ham. Jack Cork has pace and was good in the air and on the floor and (surprisingly) Thomas was very steady too. I would also have put Pekhart on the bench today as we needed some pace and height up front. JP admitted in one interview that the players were tired so he should have rested them and gone for the points with his other winning team, especially going in to a two week break and then having to come back to face QPR away. Momentum is what is needed and progression.
I have loved watching this new team play in all the pre-season and home games so far but I have a concern. If we are to play like Arsenal (comment from JP in the press) then we have a problem. Everyone knows that to suppress Arsenal, you simply flood the midfield to stop them passing and go long when you can. When that happens, Arsenal have always struggled to get anything from their games in the past few seasons. What we need is a plan 'B' which I note JP is saying today. Simpler football, shoot earlier and some early goals. then we can relax and play our pretty football in the 2nd half. Play like that and our rivals will not be able to cope. The lesson here is play toe-to-toe CCC games at SMS in the first half, and keep the 'total football' for the 2nd half and away matches.
I am still very optimistic that we will do well this season and adapt our game tactics to becoming a winning team more regularly.
HAPPY CHAPPY, ON MY WAY TO PORTUGAL says...
8:24pm Sat 30 Aug 08
15629
Now let me see
1629 Blackpool supporters
6000 kids for a quid
3000 women get in free
Leaves you with a core support of 5000
Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing
YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Now let me see
1629 Blackpool supporters
6000 kids for a quid
3000 women get in free
Leaves you with a core support of 5000
Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing
YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Fran, says...
8:41pm Sat 30 Aug 08
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Oi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly??
15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Ha ha ha
brilliant!
lovinit lovinit lovinit
juan, Hants says...
9:04pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Exactly the same as last year. Lightweight football. Tippy-tappy very nice football but totally ineffective. We have a Dutchman who is clueless about Englsih footbal. Brawn and physical strength are needed to get out of this awful division. How many more times? Blackpool were not pretty but they competed and were far stronger than Saints who are physically not in it.
HAPPY CHAPPY, ON MY WAY TO PORTUGAL says...
9:08pm Sat 30 Aug 08
15629
Now let me see
1629 Blackpool supporters
6000 kids for a quid
3000 women get in free
Leaves you with a core support of 5000
Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing
YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Now let me see
1629 Blackpool supporters
6000 kids for a quid
3000 women get in free
Leaves you with a core support of 5000
Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing
YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Fran, no answer from the skate Ha Ha says...
9:12pm Sat 30 Aug 08
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Oi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly??
15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Ha ha ha
brilliant!
lovinit lovinit lovinit
Kate, Andover says...
9:33pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Hope is not lost. We knew we weren't going to win every match with this new style of football and new players BUT on the whole, I'm still confident we will do well. This was after all, just one game.
As I've said before, when we're winning, we're playing well. The test is when we don't play well and aren't winning. Today was both - the bigger test will be how we come back from that.
I think with the right coaching over the next couple of weeks, we can go to QPR and get a result.
Seems strange nobody's mentioned how awful the ref was.....
Don't panick yet - COYR!!!
As I've said before, when we're winning, we're playing well. The test is when we don't play well and aren't winning. Today was both - the bigger test will be how we come back from that.
I think with the right coaching over the next couple of weeks, we can go to QPR and get a result.
Seems strange nobody's mentioned how awful the ref was.....
Don't panick yet - COYR!!!
US Spitfire, USA says...
9:41pm Sat 30 Aug 08
For all the "pretty" football it sounds like we are playing, the fact is the only league game we have won was against a side that also failed to beat their previous 30+ opponents. We now have 3 points from 4 games. That average will give us 35 points at the end of the season. Last year Leicester went down with 52!!!!
Obvious, says...
9:44pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Kate wrote:Errr, we've played 4 league games and lost 3 of them. So this was not "just one game".
Hope is not lost. We knew we weren't going to win every match with this new style of football and new players BUT on the whole, I'm still confident we will do well. This was after all, just one game. As I've said before, when we're winning, we're playing well. The test is when we don't play well and aren't winning. Today was both - the bigger test will be how we come back from that. I think with the right coaching over the next couple of weeks, we can go to QPR and get a result. Seems strange nobody's mentioned how awful the ref was..... Don't panick yet - COYR!!!
The ref was fine today, bit card happy, but I can't complain with any of his yellow cards.
Blame our static defence and losing possession in midfield all the time instead of the ref.
Kate, Andover says...
10:01pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Obvious wrote:I get your point about losing 3 out of 4 games, what I meant was in each of those games we've lost, we've played quite well. Today we didn't - and I blame that before the ref. He didn't help but it wasn't his cards I diagreed with.
Kate wrote: Hope is not lost. We knew we weren't going to win every match with this new style of football and new players BUT on the whole, I'm still confident we will do well. This was after all, just one game. As I've said before, when we're winning, we're playing well. The test is when we don't play well and aren't winning. Today was both - the bigger test will be how we come back from that. I think with the right coaching over the next couple of weeks, we can go to QPR and get a result. Seems strange nobody's mentioned how awful the ref was..... Don't panick yet - COYR!!!Errr, we've played 4 league games and lost 3 of them. So this was not "just one game". The ref was fine today, bit card happy, but I can't complain with any of his yellow cards. Blame our static defence and losing possession in midfield all the time instead of the ref.
But hey, there's some time to work on learning some lessons before QPR.
Benny, Painted wagon says...
10:31pm Sat 30 Aug 08
Fran wrote:I think he's got his tail between his legs, or he's one of the patched up skates that got beaten to a pulp.
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
I remember that well. They sent a little kid in to see if the wagon was empty, but the kid didn't look upstairs. So the kid went back and said the place only had a few people in, the coach load of skates rushed in thinking they could say "WE DONE THE SAINTS" but the saints all came down and cornered the idiots. What a result, they were trapped and got the biggest kicking they'd ever had!!!!!!!!! The best laugh was, they only ever wanted to row if they were out numbering fans, and about 30 saints done a coach load of about 70 skates.
Saintinexile, USA says...
1:13am Sun 31 Aug 08
Ian wrote:He scored 19 goals last season, that's why.
"Im just curious and can someone answer me this. "Why does everyone want Stern John on all the time?" In my view as we all have our own opinions but I feel he doesnt do much for the team except just holds it up." I certainly don't. He was our worst player when he came on as sub on Tuesday night. He always chests or heads the ball back towards his own goal, setting up breakaway attacks for the opposition. We needed another youngster to come on up front today: not John.
SaintMike, scotland says...
1:59am Sun 31 Aug 08
Saints did not play brilliantly but they tried, and they did not deserve to be booed!!
Have you looked at this new Saints site?
http://ohwhenthesain
ts.forumotion.net/in
dex.htm
Have you looked at this new Saints site?
http://ohwhenthesain
ts.forumotion.net/in
dex.htm
Blackpool Massive, Manila says...
4:54am Sun 31 Aug 08
'Ave it!
Oh I do like to be beside the seaside.
oh I do like to be be beside the sea.
Oh I do like to be beside the seaside.
oh I do like to be be beside the sea.
HAPPY CHAPPY, ON MY WAY TO PORTUGAL says...
5:44am Sun 31 Aug 08
Benny wrote:It just about sums up you lot when all you have to boast about is when you supposedly beat up some Portsmouth supporters. Just goes to show how little your LITTLE club has ever achieved over the years. Still if it gives you some sort of comfort when your team is
Fran wrote:I think he's got his tail between his legs, or he's one of the patched up skates that got beaten to a pulp. I remember that well. They sent a little kid in to see if the wagon was empty, but the kid didn't look upstairs. So the kid went back and said the place only had a few people in, the coach load of skates rushed in thinking they could say "WE DONE THE SAINTS" but the saints all came down and cornered the idiots. What a result, they were trapped and got the biggest kicking they'd ever had!!!!!!!!! The best laugh was, they only ever wanted to row if they were out numbering fans, and about 30 saints done a coach load of about 70 skates.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE I am
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Benny, Painted wagon says...
7:15am Sun 31 Aug 08
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Sums? No, sums is what the skates can't do when adding up this years expenditure with their crooked money, that is just about to come to an end. Oh and there was no supposedly, ask the real sc-m supporters that got the hiding. Don't forget to ask matey that got over 130 stitches in his face, in the 80s cup clash when you were done badly outside the milton, in your own yard. How embarrassing!
Benny wrote:It just about sums up you lot when all you have to boast about is when you supposedly beat up some Portsmouth supporters. Just goes to show how little your LITTLE club has ever achieved over the years. Still if it gives you some sort of comfort when your team is GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE I am LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITFran wrote:I think he's got his tail between his legs, or he's one of the patched up skates that got beaten to a pulp. I remember that well. They sent a little kid in to see if the wagon was empty, but the kid didn't look upstairs. So the kid went back and said the place only had a few people in, the coach load of skates rushed in thinking they could say "WE DONE THE SAINTS" but the saints all came down and cornered the idiots. What a result, they were trapped and got the biggest kicking they'd ever had!!!!!!!!! The best laugh was, they only ever wanted to row if they were out numbering fans, and about 30 saints done a coach load of about 70 skates.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
lovinit lovinit lovinit.
j matin, saudi says...
7:18am Sun 31 Aug 08
Ian wrote:19 goals plus(hello)
"Im just curious and can someone answer me this. "Why does everyone want Stern John on all the time?" In my view as we all have our own opinions but I feel he doesnt do much for the team except just holds it up." I certainly don't. He was our worst player when he came on as sub on Tuesday night. He always chests or heads the ball back towards his own goal, setting up breakaway attacks for the opposition. We needed another youngster to come on up front today: not John.
Boardroom Mole, says...
7:30am Sun 31 Aug 08
Michael Wilde is already getting stressed with Rupert Lowe apparently. Wilde has been telling people he thinks Lowe is undermining his position as football chairman. Wilde thinks Lowe is having too much say in football matters in particular player arrivals and departures.
One could say Wilde has got his just desserts after bringing Lowe back to SFC. That said i can also reveal that Rupert Lowe was planning his own return to SFC anyway.
One could say Wilde has got his just desserts after bringing Lowe back to SFC. That said i can also reveal that Rupert Lowe was planning his own return to SFC anyway.
It will all end in tears, when we are relegated again says...
8:08am Sun 31 Aug 08
j matin wrote:Rupert Lowe is an enigma to my psychiatrist friends. He is an anal-retentive control freak and an egotistical maniac to boot who suffers from continual bouts of megalomania. He has the sort of personality that appeals to weak people devoid of analytical skills or an ability to comprehend reality with no direction to their lives which is why some consider him to be the saviour of SFC and will support him blindly when common sense says they should do otherwise. These people will sink with him. Should he be in charge of our football club? Not in a million years look what he did last time. We had all better get used to the high probability of relegation again under his leadership.
Ian wrote: "Im just curious and can someone answer me this. "Why does everyone want Stern John on all the time?" In my view as we all have our own opinions but I feel he doesnt do much for the team except just holds it up." I certainly don't. He was our worst player when he came on as sub on Tuesday night. He always chests or heads the ball back towards his own goal, setting up breakaway attacks for the opposition. We needed another youngster to come on up front today: not John.19 goals plus(hello)
Oiley John, says...
8:53am Sun 31 Aug 08
Benny wrote:So happy chappy, has proved how sappy, the inbred skates were, when they pee'd their nappies.
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Sums? No, sums is what the skates can't do when adding up this years expenditure with their crooked money, that is just about to come to an end. Oh and there was no supposedly, ask the real sc-m supporters that got the hiding. Don't forget to ask matey that got over 130 stitches in his face, in the 80s cup clash when you were done badly outside the milton, in your own yard. How embarrassing! lovinit lovinit lovinit.Benny wrote:It just about sums up you lot when all you have to boast about is when you supposedly beat up some Portsmouth supporters. Just goes to show how little your LITTLE club has ever achieved over the years. Still if it gives you some sort of comfort when your team is GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE I am LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITFran wrote:I think he's got his tail between his legs, or he's one of the patched up skates that got beaten to a pulp. I remember that well. They sent a little kid in to see if the wagon was empty, but the kid didn't look upstairs. So the kid went back and said the place only had a few people in, the coach load of skates rushed in thinking they could say "WE DONE THE SAINTS" but the saints all came down and cornered the idiots. What a result, they were trapped and got the biggest kicking they'd ever had!!!!!!!!! The best laugh was, they only ever wanted to row if they were out numbering fans, and about 30 saints done a coach load of about 70 skates.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn't rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
Shazza, says...
10:12am Sun 31 Aug 08
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Now let me see, in on a saturday night.
15629
Now let me see
1629 Blackpool supporters
6000 kids for a quid
3000 women get in free
Leaves you with a core support of 5000
Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing
YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT
you f*cking loser....
Denzil, Chilworth says...
10:12am Sun 31 Aug 08
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote:Where were you last week you dirty skate nonce? Probably with your boyfriends scrapyard Sam and Gary Glitter. You're a joke mate, throwing insults from the safety of your Leigh Park bedsit. Bottom of the league I'm just...
Benny wrote:It just about sums up you lot when all you have to boast about is when you supposedly beat up some Portsmouth supporters. Just goes to show how little your LITTLE club has ever achieved over the years. Still if it gives you some sort of comfort when your team is GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE I am LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITFran wrote:I think he\'s got his tail between his legs, or he\'s one of the patched up skates that got beaten to a pulp. I remember that well. They sent a little kid in to see if the wagon was empty, but the kid didn\'t look upstairs. So the kid went back and said the place only had a few people in, the coach load of skates rushed in thinking they could say \"WE DONE THE SAINTS\" but the saints all came down and cornered the idiots. What a result, they were trapped and got the biggest kicking they\'d ever had!!!!!!!!! The best laugh was, they only ever wanted to row if they were out numbering fans, and about 30 saints done a coach load of about 70 skates.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn\'t rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINIT.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
10:15am Sun 31 Aug 08
Shazza wrote:Morning Shazza! ;)
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITNow let me see, in on a saturday night. you f*cking loser....
fan since 71, rouillac says...
10:32am Sun 31 Aug 08
after the dross that has appeared on this site about "we beat you up" !I for one will not visit this site again and leave it to the morons who have now polluted it . To all true supporters of this great club-Keep the true "saints spirit" alive-COYR
Real saints, says...
10:38am Sun 31 Aug 08
fan since 71 wrote:Good. F-ck off then you pr1ck.
after the dross that has appeared on this site about "we beat you up" !I for one will not visit this site again and leave it to the morons who have now polluted it . To all true supporters of this great club-Keep the true "saints spirit" alive-COYR
True Blue, Fareham says...
10:47am Sun 31 Aug 08
Fran wrote:I think that the answer to your question Fran is that he is now playing for Saints.
HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn\'t rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
11:16am Sun 31 Aug 08
I had hoped that, after his irresponsible post regarding the Mick Channon car crash, that Denzil would not post on these pages until he had something intelligent to say, but that is not the case.
He posts on a wide range of subjects. Subjects on which he is totally ignorant. With some of his quotes, it is obvious to any Saints supporter, that he has never been in St Marys Stadium, and some would doubt that he even knows where the stadium is.
He posts on these pages morning, noon and night, which indicates that he is unemployed, and by the content of his posts, is unemployable.
I do not mind paying my taxes to help people like that, but do object to paying to have them submit such dross, on a regular basis, on these pages.
There must be some way that he could be given occupational therapy, like cutting out sticky paper and making picture, play-dough or some such thing.
Perhaps he is beyond help.
He posts on a wide range of subjects. Subjects on which he is totally ignorant. With some of his quotes, it is obvious to any Saints supporter, that he has never been in St Marys Stadium, and some would doubt that he even knows where the stadium is.
He posts on these pages morning, noon and night, which indicates that he is unemployed, and by the content of his posts, is unemployable.
I do not mind paying my taxes to help people like that, but do object to paying to have them submit such dross, on a regular basis, on these pages.
There must be some way that he could be given occupational therapy, like cutting out sticky paper and making picture, play-dough or some such thing.
Perhaps he is beyond help.
kebab man, blackpool says...
11:30am Sun 31 Aug 08
Summary Saint wrote:summary:
1. Svensson and Perry were like statues today and didn't even win much in the air. Whenever Blackpool ran at them, it was far too easy to get between them. 2. Blackpool could and should have had 4 or 5 goals. 3. We have no plan B 4. The players need to run at the opposition defence, not run across the front of them. 5. Gillet, Schnerdelin and White had very poor games. 6. Lloyd James is not a right back, never will be. We need to get in a dedicated right back with some muscle 7. Drew Surman is going backwards as a player. He looks totally unconnected with the rest of the team and I think he hates playing at left back. 8. Every CCC team in the country now knows we are soft in the air and at set pieces. 9. We can play some pretty football and it's nice to see, but it needs to be quicker and there needs to be an end product. 10. Not surprised by the low crowd today all things considered, but if all those super loyal positive fans were all there today, then why was the atmosphere so bad and negative as soon as the team went behind????????
1)****
2)not even that good, relegation year
mr happy, not at work says...
11:33am Sun 31 Aug 08
why don't the echo embrace a registration scheme like most over 'forums'? a couple of wayward posts and you're a goner - we get too many idiots on here to have a constructive debate - in spite of our reality check yesterday, i firmly believe this is lightyears better than some of fare served up last year
SFC NOT PLC, says...
11:35am Sun 31 Aug 08
Nigel Pearsons doing well at Leicester i see played 4 won 3 drawn 1. Now hes the sort of manager that would of gelled the younger ones with some more experience. Al the same departures where going ahead with him towards the end of last season. Pearson was also looking foward to 'slowly' bringing in youngsters.
Rock and roll, says...
11:50am Sun 31 Aug 08
True Blue wrote:Nice try true yellow.
Fran wrote:I think that the answer to your question Fran is that he is now playing for Saints.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn\'t rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
You'll be Bottom of the league cos redtwatts going, your going down, your mafia money is being stopped, Fred dinage is still sniffing round the kids at the sand castle comp.
Happy days from the saints fans point of view.
lakjdfoaisdf, says...
11:54am Sun 31 Aug 08
mr happy wrote:The echo won't do that because then it will make them liable for any slanderous remarks made on this public forum. In other words, they could get sued. It's borderline on the law as it stands how they get away with not moderating the many moronic comments on here. I guess they have got away with it thus far because the Echo is just a small regional newspaper and no one takes much notice of it outside of Southampton.
why don't the echo embrace a registration scheme like most over 'forums'? a couple of wayward posts and you're a goner - we get too many idiots on here to have a constructive debate - in spite of our reality check yesterday, i firmly believe this is lightyears better than some of fare served up last year
Rock and roll, says...
11:58am Sun 31 Aug 08
kebab man wrote:As for you CHAV KEBAB, have you enrolled on that dyslexia course yet?
Summary Saint wrote: 1. Svensson and Perry were like statues today and didn't even win much in the air. Whenever Blackpool ran at them, it was far too easy to get between them. 2. Blackpool could and should have had 4 or 5 goals. 3. We have no plan B 4. The players need to run at the opposition defence, not run across the front of them. 5. Gillet, Schnerdelin and White had very poor games. 6. Lloyd James is not a right back, never will be. We need to get in a dedicated right back with some muscle 7. Drew Surman is going backwards as a player. He looks totally unconnected with the rest of the team and I think he hates playing at left back. 8. Every CCC team in the country now knows we are soft in the air and at set pieces. 9. We can play some pretty football and it's nice to see, but it needs to be quicker and there needs to be an end product. 10. Not surprised by the low crowd today all things considered, but if all those super loyal positive fans were all there today, then why was the atmosphere so bad and negative as soon as the team went behind????????summary: 1)**** 2)not even that good, relegation year
Or should i say;
haev yuo renolled no thta ledysxia crouse yet?
markyr, winchester says...
12:12pm Sun 31 Aug 08
can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.
One defeat and your mostly doom and gloom...., southamtpon says...
12:16pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Not a saints supporter (an exile from up north) but have been watching the Saints and local media with interest. Two wins and most of you think you are going up, a defeat and you are all doom and gloom again. Whatever the rights and wrongs of how your team are in their current financial position there is just a chance that if you are patient and get behind them you could yet see something tangible come from the attractive football. You are playing attractive football, lost on dumb penalty yesterday (and many a team has done that) and you have a team that look mainly like they want to play for the club. It takes time with young players but Alan Hansen got it wrong with his "you can't win anything with kids....." a few years back -you can but you will need to be patient and get behind them for the ride - both ups and downs! Injuries aside they will do okay this year - maybe playoffs maybe not but you should not be looking at the last day survival scenario that you faced last year!
Fran, says...
12:17pm Sun 31 Aug 08
markyr wrote:I thought you were going to a site where you "don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters". Then you say "go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football".
can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.
Why don't you find the direction of the site that only relates to these matters, and leave the football and hooliganism to guys on this site that like it.
Bejesus, some people.
markyr, winchester says...
12:24pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Fran wrote:congratulations fran...i was awiting for someone to pick up on that. i posted in such anger that it was only after i pressed the send button that i realised the mistake i had made. thanks for pointing it out.
markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can\'t spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.I thought you were going to a site where you \"don\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters\". Then you say \"go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football\". Why don\'t you find the direction of the site that only relates to these matters, and leave the football and hooliganism to guys on this site that like it. Bejesus, some people.
ps the post by "one defeat etc etc" is the sort of thing we should be encouraging on this site.
markyr, winchester says...
12:25pm Sun 31 Aug 08
markyr wrote:i know i typed waiting incorrectly
Fran wrote:congratulations fran...i was awiting for someone to pick up on that. i posted in such anger that it was only after i pressed the send button that i realised the mistake i had made. thanks for pointing it out. ps the post by \"one defeat etc etc\" is the sort of thing we should be encouraging on this site.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don\\\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can\\\'t spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.I thought you were going to a site where you \\\"don\\\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters\\\". Then you say \\\"go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football\\\". Why don\\\'t you find the direction of the site that only relates to these matters, and leave the football and hooliganism to guys on this site that like it. Bejesus, some people.
Rock and roll, says...
12:27pm Sun 31 Aug 08
markyr wrote:With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence.
can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.
There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
kebab man, reading says...
12:30pm Sun 31 Aug 08
lakjdfoaisdf wrote:ooooooh sausage roll what a pleasant suprise seeing you here..............no
mr happy wrote: why don't the echo embrace a registration scheme like most over 'forums'? a couple of wayward posts and you're a goner - we get too many idiots on here to have a constructive debate - in spite of our reality check yesterday, i firmly believe this is lightyears better than some of fare served up last yearThe echo won't do that because then it will make them liable for any slanderous remarks made on this public forum. In other words, they could get sued. It's borderline on the law as it stands how they get away with not moderating the many moronic comments on here. I guess they have got away with it thus far because the Echo is just a small regional newspaper and no one takes much notice of it outside of Southampton.
t.........or tom.........who knows
True Blue, Fareham says...
12:33pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Rock and roll wrote:In your dreams **** & Hole.
True Blue wrote:Nice try true yellow. You'll be Bottom of the league cos redtwatts going, your going down, your mafia money is being stopped, Fred dinage is still sniffing round the kids at the sand castle comp. Happy days from the saints fans point of view.Fran wrote:I think that the answer to your question Fran is that he is now playing for Saints.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn\'t rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
Get your own house in order before you start looking for cracks in ours.
I guess that you were one of the 'boo boys' giving encouragement to your young team yesterday.
'Happy days from the saints fans point of view'? What Happy Days?
markyr, winchester says...
12:41pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Rock and roll wrote:In the context of business communication by email correctness in punctuation and grammar seems to have gone out of the window (many emails start with "Hi").
markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can\'t spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you\'ll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a \"spell checker\", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
As I now know that there are some people on here that require punctuation to be correct I will ensure that all my future posts are 100% correct.
(i look forward to corrections!!!!!!)
kebab man, ha ha says...
12:42pm Sun 31 Aug 08
that shut you up sausage roll didnt it ah or was it ha mabey ah ha
lakjdfoaisdf, says...
12:47pm Sun 31 Aug 08
kebab man wrote:Sorry kebab, i don't understand your post. You also have just said "that shut you up sausage roll didnt it ah or was it ha mabey ah ha". What does this mean?
lakjdfoaisdf wrote:ooooooh sausage roll what a pleasant suprise seeing you here..............no t.........or tom.........who knowsmr happy wrote: why don't the echo embrace a registration scheme like most over 'forums'? a couple of wayward posts and you're a goner - we get too many idiots on here to have a constructive debate - in spite of our reality check yesterday, i firmly believe this is lightyears better than some of fare served up last yearThe echo won't do that because then it will make them liable for any slanderous remarks made on this public forum. In other words, they could get sued. It's borderline on the law as it stands how they get away with not moderating the many moronic comments on here. I guess they have got away with it thus far because the Echo is just a small regional newspaper and no one takes much notice of it outside of Southampton.
Rock and roll, says...
12:56pm Sun 31 Aug 08
True Blue wrote:Not me, i don't care for football personally, though it seems neither do you.
Rock and roll wrote:In your dreams **** & Hole. Get your own house in order before you start looking for cracks in ours. I guess that you were one of the 'boo boys' giving encouragement to your young team yesterday. 'Happy days from the saints fans point of view'? What Happy Days?True Blue wrote:Nice try true yellow. You'll be Bottom of the league cos redtwatts going, your going down, your mafia money is being stopped, Fred dinage is still sniffing round the kids at the sand castle comp. Happy days from the saints fans point of view.Fran wrote:I think that the answer to your question Fran is that he is now playing for Saints.HAPPY CHAPPY wrote: 15629 Now let me see 1629 Blackpool supporters 6000 kids for a quid 3000 women get in free Leaves you with a core support of 5000 Something dont add up here when 20000 is needed to break even. It only means one thing YOUR GOING DOWN THE PLUGHOLE LOVINIT LOVINIT LOVINITOi portscummer. What happened to the skate that lost his leg when he got thrown off the train in the 70s. Or the t0ssers that tried to take the wagon but got so smashed up, they couldn\'t rebuild their faces properly?? Ha ha ha brilliant! lovinit lovinit lovinit
Anyway yella, good luck with the team that on most pundits lips this year, is one of the 4 premier teams most likely to go down.
And old |Fred Dinage will still be at the sand castle comps.
Happy days "YELLA"
kebab man, not falling for that says...
12:57pm Sun 31 Aug 08
not falling for your gibbon like humour sausage roll, deary me and you call me the thick one............you are dumber than dog sh*t
lakjdfoaisdf, says...
1:45pm Sun 31 Aug 08
kebab man wrote:Well good luck with your private war. What a strange chap!!
not falling for your gibbon like humour sausage roll, deary me and you call me the thick one............you are dumber than dog sh*t
Denzil, Chilworth says...
2:14pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Artful Dodger wrote:I'd already explained I didn't write that you knob, you choose not to believe me. And stop insinuating I'm on benefits, I wouldn't even know how to get them you fool.
I had hoped that, after his irresponsible post regarding the Mick Channon car crash, that Denzil would not post on these pages until he had something intelligent to say, but that is not the case. He posts on a wide range of subjects. Subjects on which he is totally ignorant. With some of his quotes, it is obvious to any Saints supporter, that he has never been in St Marys Stadium, and some would doubt that he even knows where the stadium is. He posts on these pages morning, noon and night, which indicates that he is unemployed, and by the content of his posts, is unemployable. I do not mind paying my taxes to help people like that, but do object to paying to have them submit such dross, on a regular basis, on these pages. There must be some way that he could be given occupational therapy, like cutting out sticky paper and making picture, play-dough or some such thing. Perhaps he is beyond help.
southseachris, southsea says...
4:46pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Why oh why do posters on this site feel they have to respond to wind-ups from Portsmouth supporters? The more you respond the more they'll post and the opposite would be true if only you'd try it.
The only posts from 'down the road' worth reading are from Sailor Sam, the rest ignore and either write a post relevant to recent events or get on with your life.
The only posts from 'down the road' worth reading are from Sailor Sam, the rest ignore and either write a post relevant to recent events or get on with your life.
Ross, says...
5:22pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Yesterday was the day that Saints' young, inexperienced team came up against true Championship opposition - tall, physical, good in the air and down-right awkward in every way possible. They were frustrated and as soon as they conceded didn't have the mental resolve to get back into the game. But let's not give up on the boys - there's real quality there and I really hope Jan has what it takes to get the best from them. It's a long old season and these are still early days.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
5:55pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Denzil wrote:We all know that you have Claimed that someone else wrote it, but it had the Denzil 'lack of style' about it. It was the sort of nauseous comment that has been your trade mark, which is why and apology would have been more acceptable than trying to blame some other person.
Artful Dodger wrote: I had hoped that, after his irresponsible post regarding the Mick Channon car crash, that Denzil would not post on these pages until he had something intelligent to say, but that is not the case. He posts on a wide range of subjects. Subjects on which he is totally ignorant. With some of his quotes, it is obvious to any Saints supporter, that he has never been in St Marys Stadium, and some would doubt that he even knows where the stadium is. He posts on these pages morning, noon and night, which indicates that he is unemployed, and by the content of his posts, is unemployable. I do not mind paying my taxes to help people like that, but do object to paying to have them submit such dross, on a regular basis, on these pages. There must be some way that he could be given occupational therapy, like cutting out sticky paper and making picture, play-dough or some such thing. Perhaps he is beyond help.I'd already explained I didn't write that you knob, you choose not to believe me. And stop insinuating I'm on benefits, I wouldn't even know how to get them you fool.
No need to get in a Stu about being on benefit - there is no shame attached. We live in a caring society, and even the poor bewildered people 'who wouldn't even know how to get them' are entitled to be cared for, even at a time like this, when people who are working have a tough time finding the cash for fuel bills, the infirm have to be protected.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
6:02pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr's errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help.
markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
You should have used a capital 'I' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote 'I think' in two places.
What a pity that your "spell checker" does not also advise you of this.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
6:02pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Artful Dodger wrote:As I said, I didn't write it. You're like a broken record. Do us all a favour and chuck yourself under a train you goon.
Denzil wrote:We all know that you have Claimed that someone else wrote it, but it had the Denzil 'lack of style' about it. It was the sort of nauseous comment that has been your trade mark, which is why and apology would have been more acceptable than trying to blame some other person. No need to get in a Stu about being on benefit - there is no shame attached. We live in a caring society, and even the poor bewildered people 'who wouldn't even know how to get them' are entitled to be cared for, even at a time like this, when people who are working have a tough time finding the cash for fuel bills, the infirm have to be protected.Artful Dodger wrote: I had hoped that, after his irresponsible post regarding the Mick Channon car crash, that Denzil would not post on these pages until he had something intelligent to say, but that is not the case. He posts on a wide range of subjects. Subjects on which he is totally ignorant. With some of his quotes, it is obvious to any Saints supporter, that he has never been in St Marys Stadium, and some would doubt that he even knows where the stadium is. He posts on these pages morning, noon and night, which indicates that he is unemployed, and by the content of his posts, is unemployable. I do not mind paying my taxes to help people like that, but do object to paying to have them submit such dross, on a regular basis, on these pages. There must be some way that he could be given occupational therapy, like cutting out sticky paper and making picture, play-dough or some such thing. Perhaps he is beyond help.I'd already explained I didn't write that you knob, you choose not to believe me. And stop insinuating I'm on benefits, I wouldn't even know how to get them you fool.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
6:07pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose
Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr's errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital 'I' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote 'I think' in two places. What a pity that your "spell checker" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
r.
daz, Billingshurst says...
6:56pm Sun 31 Aug 08
All teams that are going to have good seasons have bad starts.. heads up boy's.
i think JP has everything he needs 2 make us a good team.. as said on the saints website from pery look how fr we've gone... most of the players look like they wanna get the ball on the floor and pass.. he showed in the game on sat. the back line all passed between them.. iv never seen that and they look comfortable..
WHY U GIVING UP NOW!!!
COYR!
i think JP has everything he needs 2 make us a good team.. as said on the saints website from pery look how fr we've gone... most of the players look like they wanna get the ball on the floor and pass.. he showed in the game on sat. the back line all passed between them.. iv never seen that and they look comfortable..
WHY U GIVING UP NOW!!!
COYR!
Rock and roll, says...
7:10pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post;
Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr's errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital 'I' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote 'I think' in two places. What a pity that your "spell checker" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
"which is why and apology would have been more acceptable".
I think you meant an apology!
Yes?
No?
Yes?
No?
What a complete and utter ar$e.
I think the spell checker was, urm... not used?
Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um..
......er...doing it yourself.
The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today.
Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that's a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes "i") was highlighting, just the fact you can't make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up.
Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though.
Knowing that you are a junkie sc"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
7:22pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Rock and roll wrote:What a disgusting little urchin you are, gobby little cyber warrior who needs a bloody good kicking.
Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post; "which is why and apology would have been more acceptable". I think you meant an apology! Yes? No? Yes? No? What a complete and utter ar$e. I think the spell checker was, urm... not used? Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um.. ......er...doing it yourself. The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today. Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that's a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes "i") was highlighting, just the fact you can't make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up. Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though. Knowing that you are a junkie sc"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr's errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital 'I' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote 'I think' in two places. What a pity that your "spell checker" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
7:26pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Rock and roll wrote:I didn't say that about Mick, how many times do I need to repeat myself. The Artful Soapdodger is Millbrook, explains a lot.
Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post; "which is why and apology would have been more acceptable". I think you meant an apology! Yes? No? Yes? No? What a complete and utter ar$e. I think the spell checker was, urm... not used? Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um.. ......er...doing it yourself. The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today. Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that's a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes "i") was highlighting, just the fact you can't make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up. Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though. Knowing that you are a junkie sc"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr's errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital 'I' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote 'I think' in two places. What a pity that your "spell checker" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
As I said before Looooooooooooooooooo
ser.
Denzil, Chilworth says...
7:27pm Sun 31 Aug 08
See, how did I post thiose two together.
Rock and roll, says...
7:34pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Denzil wrote:They were 4 minutes apart. Unless it takes you longer than 4 minutes to write 17 words!!
Rock and roll wrote:I didn't say that about Mick, how many times do I need to repeat myself. The Artful Soapdodger is Millbrook, explains a lot. As I said before Looooooooooooooooooo ser.Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post; "which is why and apology would have been more acceptable". I think you meant an apology! Yes? No? Yes? No? What a complete and utter ar$e. I think the spell checker was, urm... not used? Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um.. ......er...doing it yourself. The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today. Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that's a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes "i") was highlighting, just the fact you can't make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up. Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though. Knowing that you are a junkie sc"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr's errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital 'I' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote 'I think' in two places. What a pity that your "spell checker" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don't have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can't spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you'll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a "spell checker", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
But hey, who's counting!
Rock and roll, says...
7:48pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Denzil wrote:Just a quick question. Why did you deny the mick channon bit, but never said anything or denied about being called a paedo?
Rock and roll wrote:I didn\'t say that about Mick, how many times do I need to repeat myself. The Artful Soapdodger is Millbrook, explains a lot. As I said before Looooooooooooooooooo ser.Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post; \"which is why and apology would have been more acceptable\". I think you meant an apology! Yes? No? Yes? No? What a complete and utter ar$e. I think the spell checker was, urm... not used? Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um.. ......er...doing it yourself. The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today. Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that\'s a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes \"i\") was highlighting, just the fact you can\'t make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up. Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though. Knowing that you are a junkie sc\"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr\'s errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital \'I\' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote \'I think\' in two places. What a pity that your \"spell checker\" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can\'t spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you\'ll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a \"spell checker\", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
Hey? What's that all about??
Denzil, Chilworth says...
8:11pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Rock and roll wrote:I did knobrot, when I addressed you as a cyber warrior.
Denzil wrote:Just a quick question. Why did you deny the mick channon bit, but never said anything or denied about being called a paedo? Hey? What's that all about??Rock and roll wrote:I didn\'t say that about Mick, how many times do I need to repeat myself. The Artful Soapdodger is Millbrook, explains a lot. As I said before Looooooooooooooooooo ser.Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post; \"which is why and apology would have been more acceptable\". I think you meant an apology! Yes? No? Yes? No? What a complete and utter ar$e. I think the spell checker was, urm... not used? Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um.. ......er...doing it yourself. The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today. Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that\'s a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes \"i\") was highlighting, just the fact you can\'t make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up. Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though. Knowing that you are a junkie sc\"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr\'s errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital \'I\' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote \'I think\' in two places. What a pity that your \"spell checker\" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can\'t spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you\'ll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a \"spell checker\", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
What's all your paedo comments about anyway, trawling for likeminded people are you?
David Crook, Yorkshire says...
8:17pm Sun 31 Aug 08
It was the older players that let us down,I saw the match on sky,the defence was bloody awful.
David Crook
David Crook
Rock and roll, says...
8:19pm Sun 31 Aug 08
Denzil wrote:Calm down handbag.
Rock and roll wrote:I did knobrot, when I addressed you as a cyber warrior. What's all your paedo comments about anyway, trawling for likeminded people are you?Denzil wrote:Just a quick question. Why did you deny the mick channon bit, but never said anything or denied about being called a paedo? Hey? What's that all about??Rock and roll wrote:I didn\'t say that about Mick, how many times do I need to repeat myself. The Artful Soapdodger is Millbrook, explains a lot. As I said before Looooooooooooooooooo ser.Denzil wrote:Big mistake Fartful lodger, you said in your previous post; \"which is why and apology would have been more acceptable\". I think you meant an apology! Yes? No? Yes? No? What a complete and utter ar$e. I think the spell checker was, urm... not used? Well thanks for that little lecture on what i should do, whilst not actually........um.. ......er...doing it yourself. The fartful lodger and Denzil the mick channon hater and local paedo are on a roll today. Well fartful, to clarify, as it seems obvious you struggle with the obvious, my literacy and punctation was not in question - and also not perfect, so i make (that\'s a small i, because i want to) no apologies - i just get fed up with people picking up on the slight mistakes of a poster rather than the point in hand. So punctuation and literacy was not what i (yes \"i\") was highlighting, just the fact you can\'t make a sentence without a smartar$e pulling you up. Again, thanks for proving my point, that these complete idiots infest the echo forum though. Knowing that you are a junkie sc\"m millbrook loser though, will in someway give me an understanding of how you got it so wrong.Artful Dodger wrote:Looooooooooooooooose r.Rock and roll wrote:What a pratt! You think yourself so smart in pointing out Markyr\'s errors, in a post that shows that you also need a bit of help. You should have used a capital \'I\' as the personal pronoun, when you wrote \'I think\' in two places. What a pity that your \"spell checker\" does not also advise you of this.markyr wrote: can anyone point me in the direction of a site where i don\'t have to scroll through a mass of drivel posted by illiterates to find some decent debate that actually relates to football matters. i am not interested in posts from people that can\'t spell (or at least use a spell checker)whose only interest is to abuse supporters of other teams or live on past glories about fights that they were probably never involved in. grow up guys or go somewhere else and leave this site to people who want to talk properly about football.With all respect Marky, i think you\'ll find you should have used a capital at the beginning of your post, also at the beginning of the second sentence. There should also have been one at the beginning of your last sentence. There is a thing called a \"spell checker\", i think you mentioned in your post, this remarkable little piece of genius, can also help with punctuation.
You said you didn't write that one.
You must have had one too many gary glitters.
Whoohey. It rhymes, gary glitter - bitter.
I bet he was n0nsey.
Happy Gilmore, says...
8:06am Mon 1 Sep 08
Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
9:05am Mon 1 Sep 08
Happy Gilmore wrote:If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll's post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made.
Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.
Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while.
I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
James, London says...
9:06am Mon 1 Sep 08
I cannot believe the amount of drivel and iliterate crap on this site absolutely shocking.
bye bye bye - never to return
bye bye bye - never to return
Keith, Redbridge says...
11:06am Mon 1 Sep 08
James wrote:Well, thats good news for a Monday morning. Could you take Denzil with you?
I cannot believe the amount of drivel and iliterate crap on this site absolutely shocking. bye bye bye - never to return
Two tw@ts for the price of one.
James, London says...
11:15am Mon 1 Sep 08
Keith wrote:Thanks for making my point for me you simpleton!
James wrote: I cannot believe the amount of drivel and iliterate crap on this site absolutely shocking. bye bye bye - never to returnWell, thats good news for a Monday morning. Could you take Denzil with you? Two tw@ts for the price of one.
Keith, Redbridge says...
11:56am Mon 1 Sep 08
James wrote:So James, I don't care whether you call me a simpleton or not, because you have already proved yourself to be a LIAR when you said, 'bye bye bye - never to return' and then return within ten minutes.
Keith wrote:Thanks for making my point for me you simpleton!James wrote: I cannot believe the amount of drivel and iliterate crap on this site absolutely shocking. bye bye bye - never to returnWell, thats good news for a Monday morning. Could you take Denzil with you? Two tw@ts for the price of one.
Keith, Redbridge says...
11:57am Mon 1 Sep 08
James wrote:So James, I don't care whether you call me a simpleton or not, because you have already proved yourself to be a LIAR when you said, 'bye bye bye - never to return' and then return within ten minutes.
Keith wrote:Thanks for making my point for me you simpleton!James wrote: I cannot believe the amount of drivel and iliterate crap on this site absolutely shocking. bye bye bye - never to returnWell, thats good news for a Monday morning. Could you take Denzil with you? Two tw@ts for the price of one.
Keith, Redbridge says...
12:01pm Mon 1 Sep 08
James wrote:As you have proved yourself to be a LIAR, by saying, 'bye bye bye - never to return', and then coming back on here within ten minutes, calling me a simpleton does not carry much weight does it.
Keith wrote:Thanks for making my point for me you simpleton!James wrote: I cannot believe the amount of drivel and iliterate crap on this site absolutely shocking. bye bye bye - never to returnWell, thats good news for a Monday morning. Could you take Denzil with you? Two tw@ts for the price of one.
Muppet
Keith, Redbridge says...
12:04pm Mon 1 Sep 08
I am sorry that I posted 'three for the price of one', but according to my screen, posts were not accepted.
Happy Gilmore, says...
1:28pm Mon 1 Sep 08
Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i'm off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.
Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll's post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
threestands, Bournemouth says...
2:23pm Mon 1 Sep 08
SFC NOT PLC wrote:He's managing in a pub league.
Nigel Pearsons doing well at Leicester i see played 4 won 3 drawn 1. Now hes the sort of manager that would of gelled the younger ones with some more experience. Al the same departures where going ahead with him towards the end of last season. Pearson was also looking foward to 'slowly' bringing in youngsters.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
5:13pm Mon 1 Sep 08
Happy Gilmore wrote:If you also want to be picky, then perhaps you should also use a capital letter 'I' for the personal pronoun - not once, but twice.
Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i\\\'m off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll\\\'s post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
Happy Gilmore, says...
6:17pm Mon 1 Sep 08
Artful Dodger wrote:Thank you for the advice, but i have no intentions of being told what i should do, by someone that i believe - from some of the earlier posts - is from Millbrook. Millbrook, of all places, please! Forgive me for dropping to your level, but i suppose ad hominemis the only route of conduct for some people to understand, due to their inability to actually answer the general guts of the post. As such, i hope your dirty council dwelling rat of an ar$e, in time - after relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks - drags it's scummy life back into reality and out of squalor.
Happy Gilmore wrote:If you also want to be picky, then perhaps you should also use a capital letter \'I\' for the personal pronoun - not once, but twice.Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i\\\\\\\'m off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll\\\\\\\'s post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
8:05pm Mon 1 Sep 08
Happy Gilmore wrote:I am not ashamed of Millbrook, and am quite happy to indicate where I live, rather than be ashamed of it.
Artful Dodger wrote:Thank you for the advice, but i have no intentions of being told what i should do, by someone that i believe - from some of the earlier posts - is from Millbrook. Millbrook, of all places, please! Forgive me for dropping to your level, but i suppose ad hominemis the only route of conduct for some people to understand, due to their inability to actually answer the general guts of the post. As such, i hope your dirty council dwelling rat of an ar$e, in time - after relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks - drags it's scummy life back into reality and out of squalor.Happy Gilmore wrote:If you also want to be picky, then perhaps you should also use a capital letter \'I\' for the personal pronoun - not once, but twice.Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i\\\\\\\'m off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll\\\\\\\'s post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
Drop to my level? With your choice of words and phrases, you would have to raise yourself up quite a few levels to be on a par with me and the majority of Millbrook residents.
When you have got over your tantrum, picked up your toys and put them back in your pram, perhaps you would consider using language that you would feel happy using in front of your mother next time you post.
I suggested you use 'I' because it is usual for the person who uses the personal pronoun, considers themselves worthy of a capital letter. In your case, I can understand why you do not.
Happy Gilmore, says...
6:54am Tue 2 Sep 08
Artful Dodger wrote:The fact you state you are not ashamed of Millbrook, proves my point completely. The only people that live there and are not ashamed, are the druggie and drunken filth that have destroyed even more, an already rats nest of an area. I also notice with disbelieve, you defended youself when i said "i'd "drop to your level", plus your defence of Millbrook, but then said absolutely nothing when i wrote you should have "relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks". Incredible! Don't even bother with the old line "It didn't warrant a reply". It seems Artful Dodger, old chap, your pathetic attempt at higher groundsmanship, has only exposed your sad little Millbrook ar$e for the junkie filth you are. Well i hope the drugs wear off soon, but please, please, don't go and rob another old lady for your fix!!
Happy Gilmore wrote:I am not ashamed of Millbrook, and am quite happy to indicate where I live, rather than be ashamed of it. Drop to my level? With your choice of words and phrases, you would have to raise yourself up quite a few levels to be on a par with me and the majority of Millbrook residents. When you have got over your tantrum, picked up your toys and put them back in your pram, perhaps you would consider using language that you would feel happy using in front of your mother next time you post. I suggested you use 'I' because it is usual for the person who uses the personal pronoun, considers themselves worthy of a capital letter. In your case, I can understand why you do not.Artful Dodger wrote:Thank you for the advice, but i have no intentions of being told what i should do, by someone that i believe - from some of the earlier posts - is from Millbrook. Millbrook, of all places, please! Forgive me for dropping to your level, but i suppose ad hominemis the only route of conduct for some people to understand, due to their inability to actually answer the general guts of the post. As such, i hope your dirty council dwelling rat of an ar$e, in time - after relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks - drags it's scummy life back into reality and out of squalor.Happy Gilmore wrote:If you also want to be picky, then perhaps you should also use a capital letter \'I\' for the personal pronoun - not once, but twice.Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i\\\\\\\'m off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll\\\\\\\'s post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
Artful Dodger, Millbrook says...
7:52pm Tue 2 Sep 08
Happy Gilmore wrote:I note that you are so ashamed of where you live, that you do not add your location after your 'name'.
Artful Dodger wrote:The fact you state you are not ashamed of Millbrook, proves my point completely. The only people that live there and are not ashamed, are the druggie and drunken filth that have destroyed even more, an already rats nest of an area. I also notice with disbelieve, you defended youself when i said "i'd "drop to your level", plus your defence of Millbrook, but then said absolutely nothing when i wrote you should have "relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks". Incredible! Don't even bother with the old line "It didn't warrant a reply". It seems Artful Dodger, old chap, your pathetic attempt at higher groundsmanship, has only exposed your sad little Millbrook ar$e for the junkie filth you are. Well i hope the drugs wear off soon, but please, please, don't go and rob another old lady for your fix!!Happy Gilmore wrote:I am not ashamed of Millbrook, and am quite happy to indicate where I live, rather than be ashamed of it. Drop to my level? With your choice of words and phrases, you would have to raise yourself up quite a few levels to be on a par with me and the majority of Millbrook residents. When you have got over your tantrum, picked up your toys and put them back in your pram, perhaps you would consider using language that you would feel happy using in front of your mother next time you post. I suggested you use 'I' because it is usual for the person who uses the personal pronoun, considers themselves worthy of a capital letter. In your case, I can understand why you do not.Artful Dodger wrote:Thank you for the advice, but i have no intentions of being told what i should do, by someone that i believe - from some of the earlier posts - is from Millbrook. Millbrook, of all places, please! Forgive me for dropping to your level, but i suppose ad hominemis the only route of conduct for some people to understand, due to their inability to actually answer the general guts of the post. As such, i hope your dirty council dwelling rat of an ar$e, in time - after relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks - drags it's scummy life back into reality and out of squalor.Happy Gilmore wrote:If you also want to be picky, then perhaps you should also use a capital letter \'I\' for the personal pronoun - not once, but twice.Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i\\\\\\\'m off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll\\\\\\\'s post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
It is abundantly clear that your knowledge of Millbrook is on a par with you command of the written English.
It is quite common for people, when they have lost an argument, or try to bluster their way through a subject of which they have limited knowledge, that they resort to abuse and name calling. I note that, once again, that is what you resort to.
You will note that I do not called you names, or accused you of living in a rat infested slum or any of the other petty, childish things that you have claimed about the residents of Millbrook.
I imagine that the reason must be because I am an adult, and you are an adolescent who likes to talk tough from behind a computer screen.
If the country's future depends on persons like you, then we certainly have a tough time ahead.
Happy Gilmore, says...
9:46pm Tue 2 Sep 08
Artful Dodger wrote:Please please, little Millbrook scum, if you attempt sarcasm, using the English language as a weapon or tool, at least have the intelligence to wield it, you sad pathetic little Millbrook filth.
Happy Gilmore wrote:I note that you are so ashamed of where you live, that you do not add your location after your 'name'. It is abundantly clear that your knowledge of Millbrook is on a par with you command of the written English. It is quite common for people, when they have lost an argument, or try to bluster their way through a subject of which they have limited knowledge, that they resort to abuse and name calling. I note that, once again, that is what you resort to. You will note that I do not called you names, or accused you of living in a rat infested slum or any of the other petty, childish things that you have claimed about the residents of Millbrook. I imagine that the reason must be because I am an adult, and you are an adolescent who likes to talk tough from behind a computer screen. If the country's future depends on persons like you, then we certainly have a tough time ahead.Artful Dodger wrote:The fact you state you are not ashamed of Millbrook, proves my point completely. The only people that live there and are not ashamed, are the druggie and drunken filth that have destroyed even more, an already rats nest of an area. I also notice with disbelieve, you defended youself when i said "i'd "drop to your level", plus your defence of Millbrook, but then said absolutely nothing when i wrote you should have "relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks". Incredible! Don't even bother with the old line "It didn't warrant a reply". It seems Artful Dodger, old chap, your pathetic attempt at higher groundsmanship, has only exposed your sad little Millbrook ar$e for the junkie filth you are. Well i hope the drugs wear off soon, but please, please, don't go and rob another old lady for your fix!!Happy Gilmore wrote:I am not ashamed of Millbrook, and am quite happy to indicate where I live, rather than be ashamed of it. Drop to my level? With your choice of words and phrases, you would have to raise yourself up quite a few levels to be on a par with me and the majority of Millbrook residents. When you have got over your tantrum, picked up your toys and put them back in your pram, perhaps you would consider using language that you would feel happy using in front of your mother next time you post. I suggested you use 'I' because it is usual for the person who uses the personal pronoun, considers themselves worthy of a capital letter. In your case, I can understand why you do not.Artful Dodger wrote:Thank you for the advice, but i have no intentions of being told what i should do, by someone that i believe - from some of the earlier posts - is from Millbrook. Millbrook, of all places, please! Forgive me for dropping to your level, but i suppose ad hominemis the only route of conduct for some people to understand, due to their inability to actually answer the general guts of the post. As such, i hope your dirty council dwelling rat of an ar$e, in time - after relevent aids and general drug and sexual disease checks - drags it's scummy life back into reality and out of squalor.Happy Gilmore wrote:If you also want to be picky, then perhaps you should also use a capital letter \'I\' for the personal pronoun - not once, but twice.Artful Dodger wrote:Artful Dodger, I did read that post. I see rock and roll took it on himself to bring markyr to book, for being so finiky about peoples punctuation. I then noticed you decided to attack rock and roll for his post. Then in turn, was shown by rock and roll that you were not as smart as you tried to make out, as he quoted your previous mistake, thus showing you as more of a fool in the process. As for being exited at 08.06, i was on my dinner break, believe it of not, and often take a peep at the echo site for entertainment. Well i\\\\\\\'m off home now for some tea and bed. Keep up the entertainment guys.Happy Gilmore wrote: Artful Dodger . I notice with some vexation, you threw some practical English lessons at another forum user, who promptly turned your arrogance round, to make you look a complete fool. Could you explain yourself so the readers can understand your reasoning. Not replying only proved you more of a coward and idiot than usual.If you had taken the time to look at Rock & Roll\\\\\\\'s post at 12.27pm yesterday, you would have seen why my post was made. Unlike yourself, I do not live on here, just waiting to reply to posts. I just look in once in a while. I could explain more, but see no reason why I should, and certainly do not require an explanation from you as to why you should get so excited at 08.06am today.
Let me show why, for your grotty little benefit;
"on a par with you command of the written English".
I think you meant, your !
"You will note that I do not called you names".
I think you meant, call !
"If the country's future depends on persons like you".
Well, "persons" could be used in certain contexts, of a sentence, so you may have got away with that one. The trouble is fartful, due the syntax of your post and previous dribblings of yours, i think it's safe to say, you failed again.
I think we can see a pattern here.
You pull me up for not using a capital, and then make errors in your post.
You then go on to use abuse, then cry foul, because the low blow is returned.
You then harp on about me losing an arguement, because i use abuse (again, exactly like you) and fail to remember your previous dribble.
You finish off saying "I am an adult, and you are an adolescent ", and made error after error just as an adolescent.
Well done fartful, you certainly proved what a fine wordsmith of the English language you are.
Sorry did you say something? ;-)
How embarrassed you must feel now, you little Millbrook junkie filth.
David McGoldrick
In this section
- It would be nice to tell Saints fans their club is safe, says Fry
- Hants to face Sussex in Lord's final
- Gillico director Richard Williams speaks out
- Wotte's Egypt U-turn
- Saints draw pre-season opener at Eastleigh
- Four men behind new £12.5m bid for Saints
- Thomas too expensive for Saints
- Lallana won't go cheap says Wotte
- Tessem on trial with Saints
- New bidders enter Saints chase
Sponsored Links
|
|
Local Advertisers
Local Information
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Ed, Taunton says...
3:23pm Sat 30 Aug 08