Sam Wilson's dad hits back at Eastleigh boss Ian Baird

Sam Wilson, on the ball for Eastleigh Sam Wilson, on the ball for Eastleigh

BARRY Wilson, father of Eastleigh’s teenage strike prospect Sam, has challenged manager Ian Baird’s announcement that his son has been transfer-listed.

Baird stirred up a hornet’s nest last weekend by telling The Daily Echo that he had regrettably put the former Portsmouth Academy forward and Fulham trialist on the list due to “circumstances beyond my control.”

But that triggered an angry response from Wilson’s dad Barry who said he had already reached an agreement with Spitfires owner Stewart Donald for his son to be released.

The club, he said, could no longer provide Sam with the full-time training agreed when the player signed a two-year contract last October.

Wilson Snr said: “Initially Ian Baird was supposed to deliver the full-time training programme but, after many sessions had been cancelled, the club brought in Darren Waterman just before Christmas to deliver the programme.

“When (Donald’s company) Bridle Insurance finally took over at the beginning of February, they released Darren and told Sam full-time training could no longer be provided.

“I had a meeting with Stewart and we agreed that Sam would fulfil the fixtures until the end of the season and, after that, he would be a free agent.

“Ian Baird was fully aware of the contents of this agreement. He continued to try and convince Sam to stay at the club but, given that he (Baird) had already announced that it would be very difficult for kids to get into the team next season, Sam decided he wanted to try and get into a professional club again.

“It was agreed with Stewart that we would keep things quiet and agree an announcement when the club felt it appropriate.

“Clearly Ian Baird had a different agenda when he made his unauthorised announcement last week.

“For the record, Sam could not be transfer-listed as he had already been released.”

Donald – described by Wilson Snr as being “very supportive of Sam’s situation” – confirmed: “Barry got an agreement that I wouldn’t hold Sam to his contract and we tried to help by paying him during the summer and circulating his name.

"Technically it’s right that Sam wasn’t transfer-listed, but the point Ian was trying to make was that he won’t be at this club next year.”

Donald acknowledged Wilson Snr’s role as a football agent had caused friction with Baird and that it had all got “very personal.”

Until recently Wilson Snr also represented ex-Saints keeper Jack Dovey – plus he was advising promising youngsters Ben Wilson and Matt Gray, who turned down two-year deals with the club.

“The reason it’s come to a head is because of a deterioriation between Barry and Ian with regards to negotiations around other players,” said Donald. “Barry represented Jack Dovey to the point where it looked like we would lose Jack.

But when Barry stopped representing Jack, a deal was done.

“From Ian’s perspective, one of the stumbling blocks was that he was unwilling to pay an agent’s fee to Barry for Jack’s signature.

“Ian hasn’t got his own agenda, he’s got a football club agenda.”

The only interest Eastleigh have received for Wilson is from Evo-Stik South & West club Poole Town.

The youngster has, however, had two offers of trials from professional clubs, starting in July, and has been told he will be invited to join the Northern Ireland under-19 squad when they next meet.

Comments(14)

spitfire63 says...
5:14pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Aaah, so the plot thickens, the reason Jack Dovey took so long to sign is because Mr. W had his grubby little paws in the pie. No wonder he has it in for Ian Baird.
Hopefully you are also transfer listed Mr. W.

bwilso says...
5:19pm Fri 8 Jun 12

spitfire63, if I were you I would wait a bit until the full facts are revealed before you make statements like you have.

myers says...
6:00pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Not like agents to have a hidden agenda !!!!

Sir Ad E Noid says...
9:44pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Spitfire63, head for the clouds!!

Bluenose65 says...
10:22pm Fri 8 Jun 12

Oh dear !!

Pasty UK says...
10:58pm Fri 8 Jun 12

To me the lads dad,who i assume is bwilso from previos postings wants to stick up for his boy which noone would argue with and i will say he fights his corner. Mr bwilso problem is he has done it in the wrong way and is embarasing his son by fighting with people on his club forum,on this web site and wherever.If your son is that hot go and find a league club and prove your point with what your son can do in a game

Pasty UK says...
11:01pm Fri 8 Jun 12

bwilso wrote:
spitfire63, if I were you I would wait a bit until the full facts are revealed before you make statements like you have.
Mr bwilso. i am confused. are you an official agent? i thought you were just an over protective dad or ami wrong?

spitfire63 says...
11:23pm Fri 8 Jun 12

The facts are there for all to see.
I recall Bairdy saying that he had tried to contact Dovey's agent several times without the courtesy of a reply.
Most EFC supporters had no idea that the agent was Mr. W . and Bairdy had the decency not to name him despite their personal conflict.
The same Mr. W. claims to be a EFC fan. (yeah right!)
Clearly Dovey always wanted to sign but Bairdy was not prepared to grease BW's palm.
Good for Bairdy.


Time for BW to move on.

Droewors says...
8:17am Sat 9 Jun 12

Spitfire63,
Whilst I too did not know that Barry was Dovey's representative, I don't think he would have tried to prevent the player from signing for EFC, just looking for the best deal. As we know, agents are like lawyers, it is not the most popular profession but they also have to make a living so wanting a commission is not entirely unexpected.
I also believe that his intentions in this whole sorry saga were to defend his son, Whilst the agreement may well have been breached, it was not a capital offence, He wears his heart on his sleeve and used a sledgehammer to crack a nut. But let’s give the guy a break and allow this unpleasantness to die down.

bwilso says...
11:20am Sat 9 Jun 12

Spitfire 63, firstly you have no idea who I am or what I do!
"The facts are there for all to see."
Strangely I was always taught to hear both sides of a story before making my opinion, you don't seem to see things that way.
The article yesterday contained comments made by the club aimed at me, if Mr. Baird is so sensible, why wouldn't he have left private club business private? I will not comment on this situation until the club makes the agreed statement on their web site which might give some more clarity to the situation.
What I will say is that Ian Baird never had any problem reaching me at any time during our discussions so you might have got that wrong along with the other assumptions you have made....

spitfire63 says...
12:32pm Sat 9 Jun 12

All of a sudden you are saying, don't believe what you read in the papers, get the other side first....
Don't you think that is a little rich coming from you? Lol

bwilso says...
1:15pm Sat 9 Jun 12

I have never said don't believe what you read in the papers, did I. Please point me to the post where I have said that? What I have said is, "The article yesterday contained comments made by the club aimed at me".
It is clear you have made your mind up, which is fair enough, you would be best to get on with it but as I have said before, let's see if that continues to be your belief if or when the club makes a statement...somehow I don't think anything will change your position. Oh and by the way, I believe Ian Baird was an agent/consultant at one time, I wonder how he made a living then??

spitfire63 says...
1:19pm Sat 9 Jun 12

Sorry Mr W,

I know you like a good argument but I am getting bored now.

Maybe I'll see you at Poole Town sometime.

bwilso says...
2:17pm Sun 10 Jun 12

spitfire63, I know you are bored and probably somewhere in Poole but this has been just posted on the Eastleigh FC web site:
The article that appeared in the Echo recently regarding Sam WIlson needs some clarification to ensure a fair and balanced view on the statements made by the club on Ian Baird's behalf.

At no stage in any conversations we had with Ben Wilson or Matty Gray was Barry Wilson involved in any negotiations with either of the players or the club. He did not advise them nor did he try to get involved in their decisions not to take the contracts which we offered the players.

In the article it stated Stewart Donald quoted, "From Ian's perspective one of the stumbling blocks was that he was unwilling to pay an agents fee to Barry for Jack's signature". We would also like to state that in a conversation between Stewart and Barry Wilson, the following was said by Barry, " If I am the reason Ian won't sign Jack, then I will advise Jack to complete the deal without me for the benefit of the player and the club."
The club will make no further comment on theses matters.
Like I said before...two sides to any story.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree