Adkins: Midfield duo hold the key to Premier survival bid (From Daily Echo)

Hobson82 wrote:
IMO Jack Cork is Adkins best signing so far. He's full of energy and always gives 110%, reminds a bit like a young Bryan Robson. The only thing Jack Cork needs to add to his locker is GOALS.

bigfella777 wrote:
Jack Frank Porteous Cork, I think he could be as good as Willshere or Cleverley if he stays fit.

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

MGRA wrote:
4-2-3-1. Nigel must read this forum !! ;-) Davis, Shaw, Yosh, Fonte , Clyne at the back , corky and spider and the 2 holders in midfield , 3 attacking midfielders across a narrower midfield but with players who do run diagonally ( punch and Lalla ) , ramirez pulling the strings behind Sir Rickie and there is by far our best team, with Rooffelt, gayrod, Davis, fox and a few other super subs thats by far our best team.... maybe stick with Gazza instead of Davis. This was obvious weeks ago but with players out not possible to play....

Velleity wrote:

MGRA wrote:
4-2-3-1. Nigel must read this forum !! ;-) Davis, Shaw, Yosh, Fonte , Clyne at the back , corky and spider and the 2 holders in midfield , 3 attacking midfielders across a narrower midfield but with players who do run diagonally ( punch and Lalla ) , ramirez pulling the strings behind Sir Rickie and there is by far our best team, with Rooffelt, gayrod, Davis, fox and a few other super subs thats by far our best team.... maybe stick with Gazza instead of Davis. This was obvious weeks ago but with players out not possible to play....

And the great news is that by December we'll have Ramirez back...oh, hang on.

Hobson82 wrote:
IMO Jack Cork is Adkins best signing so far. He's full of energy and always gives 110%, reminds a bit like a young Bryan Robson. The only thing Jack Cork needs to add to his locker is GOALS.

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

MGRA wrote:
4-2-3-1. Nigel must read this forum !! ;-) Davis, Shaw, Yosh, Fonte , Clyne at the back , corky and spider and the 2 holders in midfield , 3 attacking midfielders across a narrower midfield but with players who do run diagonally ( punch and Lalla ) , ramirez pulling the strings behind Sir Rickie and there is by far our best team, with Rooffelt, gayrod, Davis, fox and a few other super subs thats by far our best team.... maybe stick with Gazza instead of Davis. This was obvious weeks ago but with players out not possible to play....

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:

MGRA wrote:
4-2-3-1. Nigel must read this forum !! ;-) Davis, Shaw, Yosh, Fonte , Clyne at the back , corky and spider and the 2 holders in midfield , 3 attacking midfielders across a narrower midfield but with players who do run diagonally ( punch and Lalla ) , ramirez pulling the strings behind Sir Rickie and there is by far our best team, with Rooffelt, gayrod, Davis, fox and a few other super subs thats by far our best team.... maybe stick with Gazza instead of Davis. This was obvious weeks ago but with players out not possible to play....

And the great news is that by December we'll have Ramirez back...oh, hang on.

An attempt at humour there! Nice try!

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Rising_Son wrote:

Hobson82 wrote:
IMO Jack Cork is Adkins best signing so far. He's full of energy and always gives 110%, reminds a bit like a young Bryan Robson. The only thing Jack Cork needs to add to his locker is GOALS.

That would be nice, but he is a defensive midfielder, so I would expect him to be challenging Rickie any time soon.

Velleity wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:

MGRA wrote:
4-2-3-1. Nigel must read this forum !! ;-) Davis, Shaw, Yosh, Fonte , Clyne at the back , corky and spider and the 2 holders in midfield , 3 attacking midfielders across a narrower midfield but with players who do run diagonally ( punch and Lalla ) , ramirez pulling the strings behind Sir Rickie and there is by far our best team, with Rooffelt, gayrod, Davis, fox and a few other super subs thats by far our best team.... maybe stick with Gazza instead of Davis. This was obvious weeks ago but with players out not possible to play....

And the great news is that by December we'll have Ramirez back...oh, hang on.

An attempt at humour there! Nice try!

New name on the Echo site today; straight in with daft comments and insults.

yet another WUM alert!

Seen through you, won't be responding to you again.

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

Velleity wrote:

bigfella777 wrote:
Jack Frank Porteous Cork, I think he could be as good as Willshere or Cleverley if he stays fit.

You are not, and have never been, a Saints supporter. You're a Brighton fan.
----
bigfella777 says...
9:49am Mon 27 Aug 12
We need a prem manager quickly, not a physio.
----

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

And tell me, Is football a funny old game?

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

And tell me, Is football a funny old game?

That's a matter of opinion. When you have completed your education, I suggest you think about it, and then keep your opinion to yourself.

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

And tell me, Is football a funny old game?

That's a matter of opinion. When you have completed your education, I suggest you think about it, and then keep your opinion to yourself.

If you’re going be a smart arse, first you have to be smart. Otherwise you’re just an arse. Now run along! There's a good boy!

bigfella777 wrote:

Velleity wrote:

bigfella777 wrote:
Jack Frank Porteous Cork, I think he could be as good as Willshere or Cleverley if he stays fit.

You are not, and have never been, a Saints supporter. You're a Brighton fan.
----
bigfella777 says...
9:49am Mon 27 Aug 12
We need a prem manager quickly, not a physio.
----

Still think we do need a prem manager, so what.

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

And tell me, Is football a funny old game?

That's a matter of opinion. When you have completed your education, I suggest you think about it, and then keep your opinion to yourself.

If you’re going be a smart arse, first you have to be smart. Otherwise you’re just an arse. Now run along! There's a good boy!

Now you have to resort to insults. What happened to the wit and intelligence that that you were sarcastically trying to demonstrate?

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
As I said on the other thread it's why JWP can't get a start despite his brilliance. Gaston is class and cost £12m so starts. Puncheon is putting in man of the match performances so you can't drop him. Adam is captain and play maker in chief so always starts. Add in Corky and Morgan and there's no room.

Cork is the only one providing cover to the back four which has made all the difference. In his absence I would have used Chappers to keep the balance.

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

And tell me, Is football a funny old game?

That's a matter of opinion. When you have completed your education, I suggest you think about it, and then keep your opinion to yourself.

If you’re going be a smart arse, first you have to be smart. Otherwise you’re just an arse. Now run along! There's a good boy!

Now you have to resort to insults. What happened to the wit and intelligence that that you were sarcastically trying to demonstrate?

Lambert gave 110% on Saturday, he worked his socks off! (They call that a double cliché) Now I’m just showboating!

Alicesdad wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
As I said on the other thread it's why JWP can't get a start despite his brilliance. Gaston is class and cost £12m so starts. Puncheon is putting in man of the match performances so you can't drop him. Adam is captain and play maker in chief so always starts. Add in Corky and Morgan and there's no room.

Cork is the only one providing cover to the back four which has made all the difference. In his absence I would have used Chappers to keep the balance.

Absolutely right on all points. Completely agree.

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Southampton Dominance wrote:

Velleity wrote:
Cork's return is one of the reasons why the back four have started to look so much more solid; they now have some in-depth cover from the midfield.

Much as I love Lallana, he's much happier runnning forwards than backwards. Cork and Spiderman together are worth their weight in gold.

I have to be honest, I didn't see Cork's contribution in its full glory until we were missing him; he's not showy, just very, very effective.

I don't care if he goes another season without scoring - it's a team game and he's a central member of the team.

"It's a team game". No! Really?

So, now you know, Dominance. Say, "Thank you."

Is it a game of two halves, as well?

Yes, it is, unlike ice hockey, polo and basketball.

And tell me, Is football a funny old game?

That's a matter of opinion. When you have completed your education, I suggest you think about it, and then keep your opinion to yourself.

If you’re going be a smart arse, first you have to be smart. Otherwise you’re just an arse. Now run along! There's a good boy!

Now you have to resort to insults. What happened to the wit and intelligence that that you were sarcastically trying to demonstrate?

Lambert gave 110% on Saturday, he worked his socks off! (They call that a double cliché) Now I’m just showboating!

Clearly, your wit and intelligence are either non-existent or in very short supply.

Rising_Son wrote:

Alicesdad wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
As I said on the other thread it's why JWP can't get a start despite his brilliance. Gaston is class and cost £12m so starts. Puncheon is putting in man of the match performances so you can't drop him. Adam is captain and play maker in chief so always starts. Add in Corky and Morgan and there's no room.

Cork is the only one providing cover to the back four which has made all the difference. In his absence I would have used Chappers to keep the balance.

Absolutely right on all points. Completely agree.

I'm not so sure about Chaplow, bit otherwise I agree.

Rising_Son wrote:

Alicesdad wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
As I said on the other thread it's why JWP can't get a start despite his brilliance. Gaston is class and cost £12m so starts. Puncheon is putting in man of the match performances so you can't drop him. Adam is captain and play maker in chief so always starts. Add in Corky and Morgan and there's no room.

Cork is the only one providing cover to the back four which has made all the difference. In his absence I would have used Chappers to keep the balance.

Absolutely right on all points. Completely agree.

I'm not so sure about Chaplow, bit otherwise I agree.

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

Strasbourg Saint wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

Spot on GX.

Please everyone, ignore Kent and Dominatrix.

As for Spiderman and Cork, it was fantastic on Saturday and can only get better. With JWP, Davis and others - Chappers for example - we have a solid combo and the subs to offer Spiderman and Cork a rest when required.

Red n White wrote:
We had all this talk at the beginning of the season about needed a new centre-back, but I think the last two games have shown that what we were missing was a holding midfielder to cover for Cork. I think we could do with signing one in January, possibly a 30-odd free agent who is looking to go into coaching as well, so won't mind not being in the match day squad too often.

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

I agree with you.
They only come on here because they have so little to do in their sad lives it gives them a purpose.
The intention being that they will dominate and totally disrupt the web site.
The purpose of this web site is to discuss and debate issues our great football club.
I find it frustrating to have to fly through the posts trying to find someone that is trying to debate the header story.
Or for that matter any other sensible side story.

I have to ask the question--- WHY--- are our supporters engaging with the consistent moronic rubbish posted on here by possibly 1 or 2 idivuals with multiple log ins and an obvious agenda.


My second question is,

ECHO-----

Do you want this web site to have any credability or following?
If so, find a way to eject those individuals who continue to spoil what has been a great outlet for the Saints fans?

COYR

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

I agree with you.
They only come on here because they have so little to do in their sad lives it gives them a purpose.
The intention being that they will dominate and totally disrupt the web site.
The purpose of this web site is to discuss and debate issues our great football club.
I find it frustrating to have to fly through the posts trying to find someone that is trying to debate the header story.
Or for that matter any other sensible side story.

I have to ask the question--- WHY--- are our supporters engaging with the consistent moronic rubbish posted on here by possibly 1 or 2 idivuals with multiple log ins and an obvious agenda.


My second question is,

ECHO-----

Do you want this web site to have any credability or following?
If so, find a way to eject those individuals who continue to spoil what has been a great outlet for the Saints fans?

COYR

Southampton Dominance wrote:

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

I agree with you.
They only come on here because they have so little to do in their sad lives it gives them a purpose.
The intention being that they will dominate and totally disrupt the web site.
The purpose of this web site is to discuss and debate issues our great football club.
I find it frustrating to have to fly through the posts trying to find someone that is trying to debate the header story.
Or for that matter any other sensible side story.

I have to ask the question--- WHY--- are our supporters engaging with the consistent moronic rubbish posted on here by possibly 1 or 2 idivuals with multiple log ins and an obvious agenda.


My second question is,

ECHO-----

Do you want this web site to have any credability or following?
If so, find a way to eject those individuals who continue to spoil what has been a great outlet for the Saints fans?

COYR

Thank you! Ladies & Gentleman, Winston Churchill!

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

I agree with you.
They only come on here because they have so little to do in their sad lives it gives them a purpose.
The intention being that they will dominate and totally disrupt the web site.
The purpose of this web site is to discuss and debate issues our great football club.
I find it frustrating to have to fly through the posts trying to find someone that is trying to debate the header story.
Or for that matter any other sensible side story.

I have to ask the question--- WHY--- are our supporters engaging with the consistent moronic rubbish posted on here by possibly 1 or 2 idivuals with multiple log ins and an obvious agenda.


My second question is,

ECHO-----

Do you want this web site to have any credability or following?
If so, find a way to eject those individuals who continue to spoil what has been a great outlet for the Saints fans?

COYR

TheSaintsMan wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Alicesdad wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
As I said on the other thread it's why JWP can't get a start despite his brilliance. Gaston is class and cost £12m so starts. Puncheon is putting in man of the match performances so you can't drop him. Adam is captain and play maker in chief so always starts. Add in Corky and Morgan and there's no room.

Cork is the only one providing cover to the back four which has made all the difference. In his absence I would have used Chappers to keep the balance.

Absolutely right on all points. Completely agree.

I'm not so sure about Chaplow, bit otherwise I agree.

What about Steven Davis???

seventh-junction wrote:

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

I agree with you.
They only come on here because they have so little to do in their sad lives it gives them a purpose.
The intention being that they will dominate and totally disrupt the web site.
The purpose of this web site is to discuss and debate issues our great football club.
I find it frustrating to have to fly through the posts trying to find someone that is trying to debate the header story.
Or for that matter any other sensible side story.

I have to ask the question--- WHY--- are our supporters engaging with the consistent moronic rubbish posted on here by possibly 1 or 2 idivuals with multiple log ins and an obvious agenda.


My second question is,

ECHO-----

Do you want this web site to have any credability or following?
If so, find a way to eject those individuals who continue to spoil what has been a great outlet for the Saints fans?

COYR

Good shouts. I'm guilty of reacting to the fish fiddlers but will ignore them from now on.
If we all do they will soon get bored or will be made to look like the sad and lonely attention seeking individuals they obviously are.
Skunts.....couldn't resist one last pop!

seventh-junction wrote:

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

I agree with you.
They only come on here because they have so little to do in their sad lives it gives them a purpose.
The intention being that they will dominate and totally disrupt the web site.
The purpose of this web site is to discuss and debate issues our great football club.
I find it frustrating to have to fly through the posts trying to find someone that is trying to debate the header story.
Or for that matter any other sensible side story.

I have to ask the question--- WHY--- are our supporters engaging with the consistent moronic rubbish posted on here by possibly 1 or 2 idivuals with multiple log ins and an obvious agenda.


My second question is,

ECHO-----

Do you want this web site to have any credability or following?
If so, find a way to eject those individuals who continue to spoil what has been a great outlet for the Saints fans?

COYR

Good shouts. I'm guilty of reacting to the fish fiddlers but will ignore them from now on.
If we all do they will soon get bored or will be made to look like the sad and lonely attention seeking individuals they obviously are.
Skunts.....couldn't resist one last pop!

bigfella777 wrote:

Velleity wrote:

bigfella777 wrote:
Jack Frank Porteous Cork, I think he could be as good as Willshere or Cleverley if he stays fit.

You are not, and have never been, a Saints supporter. You're a Brighton fan.
----
bigfella777 says...
9:49am Mon 27 Aug 12
We need a prem manager quickly, not a physio.
----

Still think we do need a prem manager, so what.

Strasbourg Saint wrote:

GX Saint wrote:
This thread is fast going the way of the Puncheon one. What a load of w@nkers.

It's about Cork and Spiderman. It's a positive story. Why trash the thread? There are fewer proper contributions than abusive ones. Where are all the usual credible posters? Probably can't be arsed with this puerile content.

Spot on GX.

Please everyone, ignore Kent and Dominatrix.

As for Spiderman and Cork, it was fantastic on Saturday and can only get better. With JWP, Davis and others - Chappers for example - we have a solid combo and the subs to offer Spiderman and Cork a rest when required.

saintshorse101 wrote:
i think its very obvious that losing corky put a big whole in the midfield, what we need is cover for him if he were to be injured again or suspended. however i thnk that combination of cork and morgan in the centre of the park is the best pairing we have, yes we have other midfielders who can cover but NA has tried them and its not looked as good. what we cant do though is underestimate morgans part in the partnership. NA said last year that he was one of the best midfielders in the champ and could go on to be big in the prem.
i like to think that we have had our rough patch this season, all clubs get them, and can now push on to a respectable mid table position. well i hope so anyway. lets not forget that reading went from near bottom at christmas last year to win the league, i am not saying we would do that but mid table would be great.

seventh-junction wrote:
Come on you O's

saintlysoul wrote:
Some excellent comments today much better than reacting to baiting from Pompey supporters. It seems to me that NA is in the good position of having good quality midfielders to select from!

One point I'd like people's comments on - when will JWP get a start again and how much do people see him playing!

Keep up the informative comments really helpful and illuminating!

st1halo wrote:

saintlysoul wrote:
Some excellent comments today much better than reacting to baiting from Pompey supporters. It seems to me that NA is in the good position of having good quality midfielders to select from!

One point I'd like people's comments on - when will JWP get a start again and how much do people see him playing!

Keep up the informative comments really helpful and illuminating!

Morgan is on the refs radar at the moment, saintly, so think he'll pick up a suspension soon, more than likely that's when JWP will be back in. Nice to have some depth in midfield isn't t!


STID

saintlysoul wrote:
Some excellent comments today much better than reacting to baiting from Pompey supporters. It seems to me that NA is in the good position of having good quality midfielders to select from!

One point I'd like people's comments on - when will JWP get a start again and how much do people see him playing!

Keep up the informative comments really helpful and illuminating!

Southampton Dominance wrote:

saintlysoul wrote:
Some excellent comments today much better than reacting to baiting from Pompey supporters. It seems to me that NA is in the good position of having good quality midfielders to select from!

One point I'd like people's comments on - when will JWP get a start again and how much do people see him playing!

Keep up the informative comments really helpful and illuminating!

"Illuminating"' you might want to get out more!