Adkins hails revitalised Puncheon

Daily Echo: Adkins hails revitalised Puncheon Adkins hails revitalised Puncheon

Saints manager Nigel Adkins praised match winner Jason Puncheon for his maturity after his strike earned the club a valuable victory against Reading.

The midfielder’s fourth goal of the season separated the sides at St Mary’s and capped another impressive performance from the 26-year-old.

Puncheon appeared to be on his way out of Saints a year ago, but resolved differences he had with the club and has now become an integral part of the first-team.

“He’s good, he’s matured, he’s had a good pre-season with us, he’s come back, it’s a fresh start if you like and he’s grasped it with both hands,” said Adkins.

“It just shows how if you work very hard, adapt to the culture you’re surrounded with, and grow and mature – and he’s done that.”

Saints fully deserved their win, and Adkins admitted the margin of victory should have been greater.

“I thought we dominated the game, I thought we were worthy winners,” he said. “The amount of chances we created, we should have put a few more in the back of the net.

“We played a good tempo of football, a variety of attacks and it was a good 1-0 victory for us.”

Related links

Comments (412)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:49pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Tye-Dye pt2 says...

Punch has the hunger back, another motm display with a few other worthy contenders. The 78% continue to be proven correct, there's only 1 Nigel Adkins! Onward as one, upward is our fate.



14.12.12 WTFILN!!!
Punch has the hunger back, another motm display with a few other worthy contenders. The 78% continue to be proven correct, there's only 1 Nigel Adkins! Onward as one, upward is our fate. 14.12.12 WTFILN!!! Tye-Dye pt2

6:00pm Sat 8 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

78% were right.
My disappointment at the time were the others who doubted and the Echo for starting the back stabbing of the manager of their local team.
Sometimes wonder if the Echo realise that there constant barrage of anti Saints propaganda is losing them readership daily.
The main bulk of posters on here are fully behind the team and the others tend to be WUMs who don't even support a football team, but just want to get bites. There have been accusations that the windups are actually Echo employees just trying to start a debate to show to advertisers that there is interest in this site.
Support the Saints.
78% were right. My disappointment at the time were the others who doubted and the Echo for starting the back stabbing of the manager of their local team. Sometimes wonder if the Echo realise that there constant barrage of anti Saints propaganda is losing them readership daily. The main bulk of posters on here are fully behind the team and the others tend to be WUMs who don't even support a football team, but just want to get bites. There have been accusations that the windups are actually Echo employees just trying to start a debate to show to advertisers that there is interest in this site. Support the Saints. dadofmy3sons

6:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display !
luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display ! slugger

6:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12

truelysaints says...

You know what they say, Come the end of the year, the table will show the likely positions of teams by the end of the season.”
You know what they say, Come the end of the year, the table will show the likely positions of teams by the end of the season.” truelysaints

6:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12

skiptonsaint says...

Also thought kelvin made a real difference today. Very calm lookin defence today

Are we going to look back on this end of season and say that was the point the season really started
Also thought kelvin made a real difference today. Very calm lookin defence today Are we going to look back on this end of season and say that was the point the season really started skiptonsaint

6:08pm Sat 8 Dec 12

thomasupton says...

Puncheon was outstanding again today, my man of the match. On a sadder note, hope the person receiving cpr on the pavement on the way back is ok.
Puncheon was outstanding again today, my man of the match. On a sadder note, hope the person receiving cpr on the pavement on the way back is ok. thomasupton

6:14pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Velleity says...

slugger wrote:
luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display !
Indeedy. Whenever the ball went near him you knew it was going to be safe.

Also, he did a dribble past three defenders in the first half that was absolutely sublime. He laid it off perfectly to (I think) Lambert.

He certainly doesn't look young - he won't be intimidated and has a nice touch on him.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display ![/p][/quote]Indeedy. Whenever the ball went near him you knew it was going to be safe. Also, he did a dribble past three defenders in the first half that was absolutely sublime. He laid it off perfectly to (I think) Lambert. He certainly doesn't look young - he won't be intimidated and has a nice touch on him. Velleity

6:18pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong. Baddesley Bill

6:20pm Sat 8 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game.
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game. The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled. This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January? Would it help or would it disrupt? We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available? When Adam went off, who took the arm band? dadofmy3sons

6:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Mush On The Beach says...

Where's the skunt chimp tea party now?
I'll tell you where, they are bricking it in their caravan because their worst nightmare is materialising in front of their eyes ... we are good enough to stay up and their extinction is inevitable :)

Jason Pucheon my MOTM
Where's the skunt chimp tea party now? I'll tell you where, they are bricking it in their caravan because their worst nightmare is materialising in front of their eyes ... we are good enough to stay up and their extinction is inevitable :) Jason Pucheon my MOTM Mush On The Beach

6:22pm Sat 8 Dec 12

SPIKEISLANDTRADER says...

Needed the points and commitment , well done you REDS and faith again in N.A. 15th and rising up the league
Needed the points and commitment , well done you REDS and faith again in N.A. 15th and rising up the league SPIKEISLANDTRADER

6:25pm Sat 8 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it.
A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it. A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that. dadofmy3sons

6:25pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you! Bring back Branfoot

6:25pm Sat 8 Dec 12

SFCOLDBOY says...

slugger wrote:
luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display !
Slugger,
I agree he looks like he's been doing this for years.
Totaly self assured.
Always does the simple things, was not in the least over-awed by that bruiser Roberts.
Even went past their full back a couple of times and produce good crosses.
What a propect.
COYR
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display ![/p][/quote]Slugger, I agree he looks like he's been doing this for years. Totaly self assured. Always does the simple things, was not in the least over-awed by that bruiser Roberts. Even went past their full back a couple of times and produce good crosses. What a propect. COYR SFCOLDBOY

6:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not. dadofmy3sons

6:31pm Sat 8 Dec 12

DisplacedFan says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
Bill: I thought Guly added to the team today with some nice touches.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]Bill: I thought Guly added to the team today with some nice touches. DisplacedFan

6:31pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Crossley Place Saint says...

Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.

Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season. Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long. Crossley Place Saint

6:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not.[/p][/quote]You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre. Bring back Branfoot

6:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12

DisplacedFan says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it.
A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.
Agree. If Nigel has confidence in him, that's good enough for me. I might not like all he does all the time, but booing a team player is unconscionable and counterproductive to the team's performance.
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it. A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.[/p][/quote]Agree. If Nigel has confidence in him, that's good enough for me. I might not like all he does all the time, but booing a team player is unconscionable and counterproductive to the team's performance. DisplacedFan

6:37pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Crossley Place Saint wrote:
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.

Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .
[quote][p][bold]Crossley Place Saint[/bold] wrote: Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season. Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.[/p][/quote]can't find a single bit of this post to agree with . slugger

6:38pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

slugger wrote:
Crossley Place Saint wrote:
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.

Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .
the 3 points bit i guess .
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Crossley Place Saint[/bold] wrote: Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season. Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.[/p][/quote]can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .[/p][/quote]the 3 points bit i guess . slugger

6:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12

just kidding says...

I agree Puncheon played well today, along with the rest of the team, but if you want a true MAN of the match,then that title belongs to Guly DePrado. Any one that has to put up with that kind of reception every time he comes on has more courage than those low life so called fans who booed him. No one deserves that, no matter what you think of them. Even Nigel rolled his eyes when he heard that. One thing though, seems like the man shrugged it off, cause he played really well in my opinion.
I agree Puncheon played well today, along with the rest of the team, but if you want a true MAN of the match,then that title belongs to Guly DePrado. Any one that has to put up with that kind of reception every time he comes on has more courage than those low life so called fans who booed him. No one deserves that, no matter what you think of them. Even Nigel rolled his eyes when he heard that. One thing though, seems like the man shrugged it off, cause he played really well in my opinion. just kidding

6:41pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

DisplacedFan wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it.
A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.
Agree. If Nigel has confidence in him, that's good enough for me. I might not like all he does all the time, but booing a team player is unconscionable and counterproductive to the team's performance.
To be fair...I was a little nervous for NA when he brought Guly on. Proof indeed that the manager generally knows best. The boo boys can do one IMO.
[quote][p][bold]DisplacedFan[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it. A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.[/p][/quote]Agree. If Nigel has confidence in him, that's good enough for me. I might not like all he does all the time, but booing a team player is unconscionable and counterproductive to the team's performance.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I was a little nervous for NA when he brought Guly on. Proof indeed that the manager generally knows best. The boo boys can do one IMO. Baddesley Bill

6:44pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Crossley Place Saint says...

just kidding wrote:
I agree Puncheon played well today, along with the rest of the team, but if you want a true MAN of the match,then that title belongs to Guly DePrado. Any one that has to put up with that kind of reception every time he comes on has more courage than those low life so called fans who booed him. No one deserves that, no matter what you think of them. Even Nigel rolled his eyes when he heard that. One thing though, seems like the man shrugged it off, cause he played really well in my opinion.
can't find a single bit of this post to disagree with :-)
[quote][p][bold]just kidding[/bold] wrote: I agree Puncheon played well today, along with the rest of the team, but if you want a true MAN of the match,then that title belongs to Guly DePrado. Any one that has to put up with that kind of reception every time he comes on has more courage than those low life so called fans who booed him. No one deserves that, no matter what you think of them. Even Nigel rolled his eyes when he heard that. One thing though, seems like the man shrugged it off, cause he played really well in my opinion.[/p][/quote]can't find a single bit of this post to disagree with :-) Crossley Place Saint

6:48pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Littleton-Saint says...

Let's just hope Adam's injury isn't serious. Great to see us out of the drop-zone.
Let's just hope Adam's injury isn't serious. Great to see us out of the drop-zone. Littleton-Saint

6:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12

CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger says...

If you boo'd Guly today fcuk you!!!
Big up for Saints number 1 keeper Super Kelv and wot a player Shaw is..
Coyr
If you boo'd Guly today fcuk you!!! Big up for Saints number 1 keeper Super Kelv and wot a player Shaw is.. Coyr CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger

7:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Saintsayer II says...

For me MotM was Luke Shaw because of the way he coped with Roberts who tried to muscle him out of it but totally failed

There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt

To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0
For me MotM was Luke Shaw because of the way he coped with Roberts who tried to muscle him out of it but totally failed There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0 Saintsayer II

7:08pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Saintsayer II wrote:
For me MotM was Luke Shaw because of the way he coped with Roberts who tried to muscle him out of it but totally failed

There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt

To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0
like !!
[quote][p][bold]Saintsayer II[/bold] wrote: For me MotM was Luke Shaw because of the way he coped with Roberts who tried to muscle him out of it but totally failed There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0[/p][/quote]like !! angus mc coatup

7:14pm Sat 8 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Complete anorak that I am, I have been on 6 different sites to read reports on the game and all of them state that it should have been by a greater margin.
Good....but bad!
Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us.
We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today.
Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis.
One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw.
Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne.
So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch.
Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance.
Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter.
Complete anorak that I am, I have been on 6 different sites to read reports on the game and all of them state that it should have been by a greater margin. Good....but bad! Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us. We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today. Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis. One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw. Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne. So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch. Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance. Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter. dadofmy3sons

7:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
Complete anorak that I am, I have been on 6 different sites to read reports on the game and all of them state that it should have been by a greater margin.
Good....but bad!
Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us.
We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today.
Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis.
One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw.
Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne.
So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch.
Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance.
Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter.
Fair point...we do seem accomplished at bringing the ball forward...but if only we could create the space in the opposing box to get the shot away...we'd win games like today by 3 or 4 goals.
Regardless of anything....I am a very happy Saint tonight! :0)
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: Complete anorak that I am, I have been on 6 different sites to read reports on the game and all of them state that it should have been by a greater margin. Good....but bad! Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us. We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today. Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis. One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw. Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne. So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch. Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance. Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter.[/p][/quote]Fair point...we do seem accomplished at bringing the ball forward...but if only we could create the space in the opposing box to get the shot away...we'd win games like today by 3 or 4 goals. Regardless of anything....I am a very happy Saint tonight! :0) Baddesley Bill

7:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Costa Baz says...

Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward.

He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.

Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.

Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward. He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back. Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing. Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left. Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!! Costa Baz

7:32pm Sat 8 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game.
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
My little nephew said that Fonte took the armband after Lala went off. I too thought Guly did well, because he was in the position where he is the most dangerous to the opposition and he was unlucky not to be on the scoresheet. Shaw was outstanding, Puncheons first "goal" should not have been ruled out, but the Referee got most things right. What a brave guy Yosh is he was really caught a good one. Disappointed in La Fondres performance and had spent more time playing football than arguing the toss he may have been more effective. I thought Spider wasn't as effective as usual, that fifth card hanging over him seems to be affecting his aggression. Shouldn't grumble, it was a good team performance and a much needed win. Just regretting a long wait 'til the next game, but at least it will give Lala more recovery time.
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game. The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled. This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January? Would it help or would it disrupt? We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available? When Adam went off, who took the arm band?[/p][/quote]My little nephew said that Fonte took the armband after Lala went off. I too thought Guly did well, because he was in the position where he is the most dangerous to the opposition and he was unlucky not to be on the scoresheet. Shaw was outstanding, Puncheons first "goal" should not have been ruled out, but the Referee got most things right. What a brave guy Yosh is he was really caught a good one. Disappointed in La Fondres performance and had spent more time playing football than arguing the toss he may have been more effective. I thought Spider wasn't as effective as usual, that fifth card hanging over him seems to be affecting his aggression. Shouldn't grumble, it was a good team performance and a much needed win. Just regretting a long wait 'til the next game, but at least it will give Lala more recovery time. OSPREYSAINT

7:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Costa Baz wrote:
Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward.

He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.

Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.

Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
isn't it nice when people can't agree on motm ? ........ just shows how far we've come ....... same as you for the poor fella who was taken ill .
[quote][p][bold]Costa Baz[/bold] wrote: Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward. He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back. Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing. Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left. Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!![/p][/quote]isn't it nice when people can't agree on motm ? ........ just shows how far we've come ....... same as you for the poor fella who was taken ill . slugger

7:38pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Scruffygirl94 says...

Can I make a plea please to all those who booed Guly....DON'T! Give the guy a chance! I thought he was brilliant today and was so willing him to score which he so nearly did just to prove those doubters wrong. I do wish people would trust Nigel's judgement. If he thinks Guly should come on then he should come on so can those booing supporters just start being a little more positive like the manager for a change.
Can I make a plea please to all those who booed Guly....DON'T! Give the guy a chance! I thought he was brilliant today and was so willing him to score which he so nearly did just to prove those doubters wrong. I do wish people would trust Nigel's judgement. If he thinks Guly should come on then he should come on so can those booing supporters just start being a little more positive like the manager for a change. Scruffygirl94

7:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Thornhill Saint says...

A decent display from the team. We were neater and hungrier than Reading today.

I am still not sue Rodriguez and Lambert should play together. I don't think Rodriguez was that bead, but I would like to see what Mayuka can do. Our two full backs are class, and the centre backs looked solid today

Puncheon and Clyne linking up down the right is particularly potent threat. Puncheon aside we still look a little shy to shoot however. Lambert's effort in the first half was class.

A titanic battle between Shaw and Roberts. Both played well and kept each other busy. It was good to see Le Fondre have an off day. I still cringe a bit when I think of how he and Reading took us to the cleaners last season.

Unfortunately when he comes on it has a detrimental effect on the crowd. Some boo. Some others tell those that boo to shut up. The singing stops and the murmuring is deafening as everybody discusses.the Guly factor. None of it is his fault really. All he can do is his best when he comes on. He made a positive impact today. Some of the more cynical sorts kept saying, "Who is he?" and "Is that the same Guly". As Dave Merrington said, he gets knocked all the time. When a player deserves it is it so difficult to simply say "He played well".

I hope Lallana is OK. Not a bad time to have a couple of weeks off. Onwards and upwards!!!
A decent display from the team. We were neater and hungrier than Reading today. I am still not sue Rodriguez and Lambert should play together. I don't think Rodriguez was that bead, but I would like to see what Mayuka can do. Our two full backs are class, and the centre backs looked solid today Puncheon and Clyne linking up down the right is particularly potent threat. Puncheon aside we still look a little shy to shoot however. Lambert's effort in the first half was class. A titanic battle between Shaw and Roberts. Both played well and kept each other busy. It was good to see Le Fondre have an off day. I still cringe a bit when I think of how he and Reading took us to the cleaners last season. Unfortunately when he comes on it has a detrimental effect on the crowd. Some boo. Some others tell those that boo to shut up. The singing stops and the murmuring is deafening as everybody discusses.the Guly factor. None of it is his fault really. All he can do is his best when he comes on. He made a positive impact today. Some of the more cynical sorts kept saying, "Who is he?" and "Is that the same Guly". As Dave Merrington said, he gets knocked all the time. When a player deserves it is it so difficult to simply say "He played well". I hope Lallana is OK. Not a bad time to have a couple of weeks off. Onwards and upwards!!! Thornhill Saint

7:42pm Sat 8 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not.[/p][/quote]You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.[/p][/quote]In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation. OSPREYSAINT

7:45pm Sat 8 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game.
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
My little nephew said that Fonte took the armband after Lala went off. I too thought Guly did well, because he was in the position where he is the most dangerous to the opposition and he was unlucky not to be on the scoresheet. Shaw was outstanding, Puncheons first "goal" should not have been ruled out, but the Referee got most things right. What a brave guy Yosh is he was really caught a good one. Disappointed in La Fondres performance and had spent more time playing football than arguing the toss he may have been more effective. I thought Spider wasn't as effective as usual, that fifth card hanging over him seems to be affecting his aggression. Shouldn't grumble, it was a good team performance and a much needed win. Just regretting a long wait 'til the next game, but at least it will give Lala more recovery time.
Sorry I missed out "Roberts" after La Fondre insert between 'had' and 'spent'!
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game. The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled. This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January? Would it help or would it disrupt? We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available? When Adam went off, who took the arm band?[/p][/quote]My little nephew said that Fonte took the armband after Lala went off. I too thought Guly did well, because he was in the position where he is the most dangerous to the opposition and he was unlucky not to be on the scoresheet. Shaw was outstanding, Puncheons first "goal" should not have been ruled out, but the Referee got most things right. What a brave guy Yosh is he was really caught a good one. Disappointed in La Fondres performance and had spent more time playing football than arguing the toss he may have been more effective. I thought Spider wasn't as effective as usual, that fifth card hanging over him seems to be affecting his aggression. Shouldn't grumble, it was a good team performance and a much needed win. Just regretting a long wait 'til the next game, but at least it will give Lala more recovery time.[/p][/quote]Sorry I missed out "Roberts" after La Fondre insert between 'had' and 'spent'! OSPREYSAINT

7:47pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
echo that ospreysaint , support the whole team ...... how hard can it be if you're a saint ?
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not.[/p][/quote]You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.[/p][/quote]In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.[/p][/quote]echo that ospreysaint , support the whole team ...... how hard can it be if you're a saint ? slugger

7:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Reality-man says...

slugger wrote:
Crossley Place Saint wrote:
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.

Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .
I'm with you slugger, something about this comment smells a little fishy
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Crossley Place Saint[/bold] wrote: Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season. Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.[/p][/quote]can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .[/p][/quote]I'm with you slugger, something about this comment smells a little fishy Reality-man

7:51pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

I blame Fox :)
I blame Fox :) Seedhouse the Unrepentant

7:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
Not just me then :0)
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not.[/p][/quote]You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.[/p][/quote]In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.[/p][/quote]Not just me then :0) Baddesley Bill

7:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12

SaintinCanada says...

Scruffygirl94 wrote:
Can I make a plea please to all those who booed Guly....DON'T! Give the guy a chance! I thought he was brilliant today and was so willing him to score which he so nearly did just to prove those doubters wrong. I do wish people would trust Nigel's judgement. If he thinks Guly should come on then he should come on so can those booing supporters just start being a little more positive like the manager for a change.
Well said!!!
[quote][p][bold]Scruffygirl94[/bold] wrote: Can I make a plea please to all those who booed Guly....DON'T! Give the guy a chance! I thought he was brilliant today and was so willing him to score which he so nearly did just to prove those doubters wrong. I do wish people would trust Nigel's judgement. If he thinks Guly should come on then he should come on so can those booing supporters just start being a little more positive like the manager for a change.[/p][/quote]Well said!!! SaintinCanada

7:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Velleity says...

I blame Guly.

Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one.
I blame Guly. Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves. Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one. Velleity

7:56pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

an almost fish free site , how nice .
an almost fish free site , how nice . slugger

7:56pm Sat 8 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Anybody care how Poopey got on?
Anybody care how Poopey got on? dadofmy3sons

8:00pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

i also thought yoshida and jose had good games , any advance ?
i also thought yoshida and jose had good games , any advance ? slugger

8:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Scunthorpe United says...

10 points out of 15 in the last five matches - well done to Nigel (and Andy) and the boys!
Keep the faith! The glass is half full!
10 points out of 15 in the last five matches - well done to Nigel (and Andy) and the boys! Keep the faith! The glass is half full! Scunthorpe United

8:06pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Tye-Dye pt2 says...

Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ! Tye-Dye pt2

8:09pm Sat 8 Dec 12

RedArmy1 says...

GREAT RESULT TODAY !!

WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY
NOW ????

Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well.

RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY

WE RULE THE SOUTH.
GREAT RESULT TODAY !! WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY NOW ???? Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well. RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY WE RULE THE SOUTH. RedArmy1

8:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Velleity says...

Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh

!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
[quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh. Velleity

8:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
OSPers you think he was sublime? Le Tissier was sublime, in certain matches. Do Prado was threatening because he was played in his correct position. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that the fans should lay off him, but Premiership quality, I'm skeptical. Hope he proves me wrong!
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not.[/p][/quote]You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.[/p][/quote]In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.[/p][/quote]OSPers you think he was sublime? Le Tissier was sublime, in certain matches. Do Prado was threatening because he was played in his correct position. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that the fans should lay off him, but Premiership quality, I'm skeptical. Hope he proves me wrong! Bring back Branfoot

8:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

RedArmy1 wrote:
GREAT RESULT TODAY !!

WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY
NOW ????

Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well.

RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY

WE RULE THE SOUTH.
I'm going. And so our my 20 other personalities.

It's all good. Like the Newcastle game you can't pick a bad man of the match. For me Punch didn't have his best game, but he scored twice.

Was in aap3 box today. Nice people, very supportive of the club they sponsor - they do away games. The futures brght - it's red and a bit of white!
[quote][p][bold]RedArmy1[/bold] wrote: GREAT RESULT TODAY !! WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY NOW ???? Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well. RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY WE RULE THE SOUTH.[/p][/quote]I'm going. And so our my 20 other personalities. It's all good. Like the Newcastle game you can't pick a bad man of the match. For me Punch didn't have his best game, but he scored twice. Was in aap3 box today. Nice people, very supportive of the club they sponsor - they do away games. The futures brght - it's red and a bit of white! Seedhouse the Unrepentant

8:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12

RedArmy1 says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.

Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
It's just you!
no it's not.
You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
OSPers you think he was sublime? Le Tissier was sublime, in certain matches. Do Prado was threatening because he was played in his correct position. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that the fans should lay off him, but Premiership quality, I'm skeptical. Hope he proves me wrong!
Guly looked good today.

ALL THE TEAM PLAYED WELL.

Luke Shaw is tenacious and was Quality.

RED ARMY RULE THE SOUTH.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team. Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.[/p][/quote]It's just you![/p][/quote]no it's not.[/p][/quote]You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.[/p][/quote]In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.[/p][/quote]OSPers you think he was sublime? Le Tissier was sublime, in certain matches. Do Prado was threatening because he was played in his correct position. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that the fans should lay off him, but Premiership quality, I'm skeptical. Hope he proves me wrong![/p][/quote]Guly looked good today. ALL THE TEAM PLAYED WELL. Luke Shaw is tenacious and was Quality. RED ARMY RULE THE SOUTH. RedArmy1

8:23pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh


!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin

g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates! Bring back Branfoot

8:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Costa Baz says...

slugger wrote:
Costa Baz wrote:
Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward.

He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.

Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.

Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
isn't it nice when people can't agree on motm ? ........ just shows how far we've come ....... same as you for the poor fella who was taken ill .
It was a good team performance against a poor Reading team that looks destined to go back down.

Always good to disagree on MOTM.
Also good to discuss football on a football thread.

Long may it continue.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Costa Baz[/bold] wrote: Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward. He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back. Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing. Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left. Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!![/p][/quote]isn't it nice when people can't agree on motm ? ........ just shows how far we've come ....... same as you for the poor fella who was taken ill .[/p][/quote]It was a good team performance against a poor Reading team that looks destined to go back down. Always good to disagree on MOTM. Also good to discuss football on a football thread. Long may it continue. Costa Baz

8:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Velleity wrote:
I blame Guly.

Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one.
Now that's a wise comment! Booing your own player is plain dumb! But on here, fans should be allowed to voice their opinions on a player, without the Stepford wives going ape!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: I blame Guly. Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves. Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one.[/p][/quote]Now that's a wise comment! Booing your own player is plain dumb! But on here, fans should be allowed to voice their opinions on a player, without the Stepford wives going ape! Bring back Branfoot

8:30pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh



!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin


g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface ! slugger

8:32pm Sat 8 Dec 12

toutlaw says...

Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
Great performance. To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at? He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality toutlaw

8:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh




!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin



g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0) Baddesley Bill

8:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh





!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin




g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
is that football talk ? ........ i may just report this , anyone else ?
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]is that football talk ? ........ i may just report this , anyone else ? slugger

8:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

slugger wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh




!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin



g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface ![/p][/quote]Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat! Bring back Branfoot

8:36pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

slugger wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh






!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin





g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
is that football talk ? ........ i may just report this , anyone else ?
He calls me a w, And I can't give a bit back. See you're proving my point, you are just a dummy!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]is that football talk ? ........ i may just report this , anyone else ?[/p][/quote]He calls me a w, And I can't give a bit back. See you're proving my point, you are just a dummy! Bring back Branfoot

8:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
slugger wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh





!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin




g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat!
i'm a saint and you aint ...... ta ta .
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface ![/p][/quote]Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat![/p][/quote]i'm a saint and you aint ...... ta ta . slugger

8:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0) Baddesley Bill

8:41pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Another thing, I like this, everybody knows that the most regular visitors of you have multiple users! You all come on at the same time! Bill, Angus and slugger are the same. But the funniest thing of all is that you still come off second best in the spats! Incredible, unbelievable, but totally brilliant! Lol
Another thing, I like this, everybody knows that the most regular visitors of you have multiple users! You all come on at the same time! Bill, Angus and slugger are the same. But the funniest thing of all is that you still come off second best in the spats! Incredible, unbelievable, but totally brilliant! Lol Bring back Branfoot

8:42pm Sat 8 Dec 12

boilerman says...

Good three points, should have won by more as a little bit nervous every time we gave away free kicks around the box.
I thought Reading got away with a lot yet we seemed to get pulled up more by the ref.
Well done Nigel and the boys bring on Sunderland and lets destroy them to improve our goal difference, onwards and upwards.
Good three points, should have won by more as a little bit nervous every time we gave away free kicks around the box. I thought Reading got away with a lot yet we seemed to get pulled up more by the ref. Well done Nigel and the boys bring on Sunderland and lets destroy them to improve our goal difference, onwards and upwards. boilerman

8:46pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

also good results around us today , i have a good feeling about the rest of our season .......... i believe we're only 11 points from a champion league spot , how positive is that ?
also good results around us today , i have a good feeling about the rest of our season .......... i believe we're only 11 points from a champion league spot , how positive is that ? slugger

8:47pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh





!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin




g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
As I said, you're a totalwanker.

Anyone who comes on here naming himself after the most hated manager we've ever had, slags of the 'orange' manager and the players, and sides with the skunts is atwat.

I really hope you're a skunt. if you are a saint then you bring shame on us all.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]As I said, you're a totalwanker. Anyone who comes on here naming himself after the most hated manager we've ever had, slags of the 'orange' manager and the players, and sides with the skunts is atwat. I really hope you're a skunt. if you are a saint then you bring shame on us all. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

8:47pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol Bring back Branfoot

8:48pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh





!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin




g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
I was in politics. It didn't work out...
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)[/p][/quote]I was in politics. It didn't work out... Seedhouse the Unrepentant

8:51pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
So...we are agreed..you lost the plot then...cheers :0)
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol[/p][/quote]So...we are agreed..you lost the plot then...cheers :0) Baddesley Bill

8:52pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Little Hitler says...

Big mouth Bring Back Branfoot's blown a fuse!
Big mouth Bring Back Branfoot's blown a fuse! Little Hitler

8:52pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh






!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin





g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
As I said, you're a totalwanker.

Anyone who comes on here naming himself after the most hated manager we've ever had, slags of the 'orange' manager and the players, and sides with the skunts is atwat.

I really hope you're a skunt. if you are a saint then you bring shame on us all.
You bring shame on us! I remember the amount of students from other cities, studying here, who used to take the p1ss out All locals, because of d1cks like you. They had us all down as a bunch of yokels, because of vegetables like you, no offence! Call a spade a spade and all that!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]As I said, you're a totalwanker. Anyone who comes on here naming himself after the most hated manager we've ever had, slags of the 'orange' manager and the players, and sides with the skunts is atwat. I really hope you're a skunt. if you are a saint then you bring shame on us all.[/p][/quote]You bring shame on us! I remember the amount of students from other cities, studying here, who used to take the p1ss out All locals, because of d1cks like you. They had us all down as a bunch of yokels, because of vegetables like you, no offence! Call a spade a spade and all that! Bring back Branfoot

8:52pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
You're getting desperate. Go to bed.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol[/p][/quote]You're getting desperate. Go to bed. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

8:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh





!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin




g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob angus mc coatup

8:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Velleity says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh



!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin


g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
I don't wind "the Skates" up. If you can find a post where I've ever used that word, for a start, I'll give you a tenner. I'm all for just ignoring them.

I call them Portsmouth fans (as above) as I simply don't buy into any football hatred. I know a Man U fan whose life was ruined by hooligans (incidentally wearing Saints colours) and I never, ever join in when the songs are aimed at Portsmouth.

However, I dislike their constant and tediously unfunny posts on here, though I like some of the Portsmouth posters who actually think and try to banter rather than drip feed hate.

Unfortunately, you side with the unfunny idiots (kent, scooter, et al) often enough that I suspect you are one of them. Joining the gang of unpleasant posters from Porstmouth is possibly not the way to be taken seriously (or even seen to be a Saints fan).

I'm sure your response will be abusive but before you do, you might want to consider whether there might be anything true in what I'm saying.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]I don't wind "the Skates" up. If you can find a post where I've ever used that word, for a start, I'll give you a tenner. I'm all for just ignoring them. I call them Portsmouth fans (as above) as I simply don't buy into any football hatred. I know a Man U fan whose life was ruined by hooligans (incidentally wearing Saints colours) and I never, ever join in when the songs are aimed at Portsmouth. However, I dislike their constant and tediously unfunny posts on here, though I like some of the Portsmouth posters who actually think and try to banter rather than drip feed hate. Unfortunately, you side with the unfunny idiots (kent, scooter, et al) often enough that I suspect you are one of them. Joining the gang of unpleasant posters from Porstmouth is possibly not the way to be taken seriously (or even seen to be a Saints fan). I'm sure your response will be abusive but before you do, you might want to consider whether there might be anything true in what I'm saying. Velleity

8:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
You're getting desperate. Go to bed.
Desperate is creating multiple usernames and spending your whole life on a thread! Quick, log someone else in to agree with you. Lol
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol[/p][/quote]You're getting desperate. Go to bed.[/p][/quote]Desperate is creating multiple usernames and spending your whole life on a thread! Quick, log someone else in to agree with you. Lol Bring back Branfoot

8:57pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
You're getting desperate. Go to bed.
Desperate is creating multiple usernames and spending your whole life on a thread! Quick, log someone else in to agree with you. Lol
Oh dear. Nurse!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol[/p][/quote]You're getting desperate. Go to bed.[/p][/quote]Desperate is creating multiple usernames and spending your whole life on a thread! Quick, log someone else in to agree with you. Lol[/p][/quote]Oh dear. Nurse! Seedhouse the Unrepentant

8:58pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Velleity wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh




!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin



g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
I don't wind "the Skates" up. If you can find a post where I've ever used that word, for a start, I'll give you a tenner. I'm all for just ignoring them.

I call them Portsmouth fans (as above) as I simply don't buy into any football hatred. I know a Man U fan whose life was ruined by hooligans (incidentally wearing Saints colours) and I never, ever join in when the songs are aimed at Portsmouth.

However, I dislike their constant and tediously unfunny posts on here, though I like some of the Portsmouth posters who actually think and try to banter rather than drip feed hate.

Unfortunately, you side with the unfunny idiots (kent, scooter, et al) often enough that I suspect you are one of them. Joining the gang of unpleasant posters from Porstmouth is possibly not the way to be taken seriously (or even seen to be a Saints fan).

I'm sure your response will be abusive but before you do, you might want to consider whether there might be anything true in what I'm saying.
Now this person doesn't agree with me and backs up his points with valid reasons and is polite! You I respect! The rest of the wives should take a leaf out Valleity's book!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]I don't wind "the Skates" up. If you can find a post where I've ever used that word, for a start, I'll give you a tenner. I'm all for just ignoring them. I call them Portsmouth fans (as above) as I simply don't buy into any football hatred. I know a Man U fan whose life was ruined by hooligans (incidentally wearing Saints colours) and I never, ever join in when the songs are aimed at Portsmouth. However, I dislike their constant and tediously unfunny posts on here, though I like some of the Portsmouth posters who actually think and try to banter rather than drip feed hate. Unfortunately, you side with the unfunny idiots (kent, scooter, et al) often enough that I suspect you are one of them. Joining the gang of unpleasant posters from Porstmouth is possibly not the way to be taken seriously (or even seen to be a Saints fan). I'm sure your response will be abusive but before you do, you might want to consider whether there might be anything true in what I'm saying.[/p][/quote]Now this person doesn't agree with me and backs up his points with valid reasons and is polite! You I respect! The rest of the wives should take a leaf out Valleity's book! Bring back Branfoot

9:00pm Sat 8 Dec 12

mack chinnon says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh






!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin





g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)[/p][/quote]I was in politics. It didn't work out...[/p][/quote]Fiddiling your expense,s were you. mack chinnon

9:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Velleity says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Hadn't read this when I posted last.

Who's judging that you get the best of the witty retorts? Ah, you, of course. Makes your opinion .... well .... worthless, frankly.

I don't see anyone (bar your friends Kent, Moreglory and Scooter) telling you that you're funny.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol[/p][/quote]Hadn't read this when I posted last. Who's judging that you get the best of the witty retorts? Ah, you, of course. Makes your opinion .... well .... worthless, frankly. I don't see anyone (bar your friends Kent, Moreglory and Scooter) telling you that you're funny. Velleity

9:03pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

mack chinnon wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh







!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin






g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Sadly I didn't get that far :(
[quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)[/p][/quote]I was in politics. It didn't work out...[/p][/quote]Fiddiling your expense,s were you.[/p][/quote]Sadly I didn't get that far :( Seedhouse the Unrepentant

9:06pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh






!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin





g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus! Bring back Branfoot

9:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.
Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

9:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
mack chinnon wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh








!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin







g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Sadly I didn't get that far :(
That's democracy for ya!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)[/p][/quote]I was in politics. It didn't work out...[/p][/quote]Fiddiling your expense,s were you.[/p][/quote]Sadly I didn't get that far :([/p][/quote]That's democracy for ya! Baddesley Bill

9:09pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Little Hitler says...

I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then.

There there, there there...
I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then. There there, there there... Little Hitler

9:10pm Sat 8 Dec 12

F Fan says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
slugger wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh





!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin




g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat!
Quite right. I do sometimes laugh and sometimes get angry at posts that are stupid and/or abusive. Yours are usually both.

Guly looked fit and up for it today. I do think he is much better playing up front than in midfield. Holds the ball pretty well, very good pass completion and has a touch of class on the ball. Disgraceful booing when he came on. Best fans in the country? I think not.

Rodriguez did better today – worked really hard - but his touch isn’t great and he is too selfish when near to goal.

Shaw is just awesome – period - not just for his age. Early days yet but after Cole and Baines, who is a better English left back at the moment?

Fonte is getting much better as he gets to the pace of the PL and Yashida reads the play so well. But his distribution is poor. Puncheon and Clyne are shaping up as a pretty formidable partnership.

Interesting piece by Jim White in the Telegraph today on how the increase in goals lost by the top teams this season may be linked to full backs struggling to cope with the 4231 formation imported from Spain. With the 3 roaming all over the place, full backs don’t have an obvious person to mark and are sucked up field and in field, leaving space behind them – think Danny Fox and these open swathes that cost us dearly early on in the season. Cork is so good at covering that we get away with it more now and Shaw is simply better than Fox.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface ![/p][/quote]Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat![/p][/quote]Quite right. I do sometimes laugh and sometimes get angry at posts that are stupid and/or abusive. Yours are usually both. Guly looked fit and up for it today. I do think he is much better playing up front than in midfield. Holds the ball pretty well, very good pass completion and has a touch of class on the ball. Disgraceful booing when he came on. Best fans in the country? I think not. Rodriguez did better today – worked really hard - but his touch isn’t great and he is too selfish when near to goal. Shaw is just awesome – period - not just for his age. Early days yet but after Cole and Baines, who is a better English left back at the moment? Fonte is getting much better as he gets to the pace of the PL and Yashida reads the play so well. But his distribution is poor. Puncheon and Clyne are shaping up as a pretty formidable partnership. Interesting piece by Jim White in the Telegraph today on how the increase in goals lost by the top teams this season may be linked to full backs struggling to cope with the 4231 formation imported from Spain. With the 3 roaming all over the place, full backs don’t have an obvious person to mark and are sucked up field and in field, leaving space behind them – think Danny Fox and these open swathes that cost us dearly early on in the season. Cork is so good at covering that we get away with it more now and Shaw is simply better than Fox. F Fan

9:11pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.
absobloodylutely ........ 11 points from champions league !
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.[/p][/quote]absobloodylutely ........ 11 points from champions league ! slugger

9:12pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Little Hitler wrote:
I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then.

There there, there there...
I'm perplexed ..they should be celebrating their point against the L1 leaders today....

...Tranmere I think.
[quote][p][bold]Little Hitler[/bold] wrote: I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then. There there, there there...[/p][/quote]I'm perplexed ..they should be celebrating their point against the L1 leaders today.... ...Tranmere I think. Baddesley Bill

9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Puddletown Saint says...

Hey guys - there was a football match today that we won:

Davis 7 Calming
Clyne 8 Future England
Shaw 8 Now England
Fonte 7 Improving
Yosida 7 Steady
Punch 8 Impressive
Lallana 7 Hope he is okay
Cork 8 Makes the difference
Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion
Lambert 7 Team player
Jay Rod 7 His best game
Gaston 7 More central
Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception

2 weeks seems a long time COYR
Hey guys - there was a football match today that we won: Davis 7 Calming Clyne 8 Future England Shaw 8 Now England Fonte 7 Improving Yosida 7 Steady Punch 8 Impressive Lallana 7 Hope he is okay Cork 8 Makes the difference Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion Lambert 7 Team player Jay Rod 7 His best game Gaston 7 More central Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception 2 weeks seems a long time COYR Puddletown Saint

9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12

mack chinnon says...

Little Hitler wrote:
I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then.

There there, there there...
NO. Support Preston.
[quote][p][bold]Little Hitler[/bold] wrote: I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then. There there, there there...[/p][/quote]NO. Support Preston. mack chinnon

9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh







!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin






g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself . angus mc coatup

9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint! Bring back Branfoot

9:14pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Stroppy_gramps says...

With regard to Do Prado

The only response to the boos is for the rest of the fans to cheer louder.

I think it's because he's a bit like the French Rugby team.

You never what is going to turn up - a sublime, effortless player like today or just baggage that the rest of the team has to play around
That's kind of frustrating to watch when your team is fighting to get out of the relegation zone. So I'm not surprised some fans have the knives out for him.

I really really hope that he can keep up more performances like today. I said it in another thread and I'll say it here - I'm no Guly fan but today he was superb and another 5 minutes in the game and he would have scored.

As for the rest..... the whole team can be motm for me. Shaw is shaping up wonderfully - a very mature performance today, especially when he wouldn't allow himself to be muscled off the ball.
Davis put in a solid performance but wasn't really given any problem shots to deal with. The movement off the ball by the whole time was brilliant.

I thought the referee was shocking in general -for both teams.
With regard to Do Prado The only response to the boos is for the rest of the fans to cheer louder. I think it's because he's a bit like the French Rugby team. You never what is going to turn up - a sublime, effortless player like today or just baggage that the rest of the team has to play around That's kind of frustrating to watch when your team is fighting to get out of the relegation zone. So I'm not surprised some fans have the knives out for him. I really really hope that he can keep up more performances like today. I said it in another thread and I'll say it here - I'm no Guly fan but today he was superb and another 5 minutes in the game and he would have scored. As for the rest..... the whole team can be motm for me. Shaw is shaping up wonderfully - a very mature performance today, especially when he wouldn't allow himself to be muscled off the ball. Davis put in a solid performance but wasn't really given any problem shots to deal with. The movement off the ball by the whole time was brilliant. I thought the referee was shocking in general -for both teams. Stroppy_gramps

9:15pm Sat 8 Dec 12

penalty says...

My motm is jose- i thought he was awesome today. Gaston did well when he came on. Jayrod did ok against a poor Reading backline-it's true he needs the experience but he'll struggle to make an impact against the better sides this season- i think Saints see him as a long term successor for SRL. Guly looked up for it today and was actually played in the correct position.
Great to see us move up the table...Looking forward to whipping Sunderland.
Red Army!!
My motm is jose- i thought he was awesome today. Gaston did well when he came on. Jayrod did ok against a poor Reading backline-it's true he needs the experience but he'll struggle to make an impact against the better sides this season- i think Saints see him as a long term successor for SRL. Guly looked up for it today and was actually played in the correct position. Great to see us move up the table...Looking forward to whipping Sunderland. Red Army!! penalty

9:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
mack chinnon wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh









!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin








g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Sadly I didn't get that far :(
That's democracy for ya!
No, it's the tory party. If I'd got in front of the electorate i'd have romped it!

Reading got Sunderland this Tuesday I think, a draw would be nice.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)[/p][/quote]I was in politics. It didn't work out...[/p][/quote]Fiddiling your expense,s were you.[/p][/quote]Sadly I didn't get that far :([/p][/quote]That's democracy for ya![/p][/quote]No, it's the tory party. If I'd got in front of the electorate i'd have romped it! Reading got Sunderland this Tuesday I think, a draw would be nice. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

9:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh








!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin







g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol Bring back Branfoot

9:19pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh









!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin








g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one! Bring back Branfoot

9:24pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Fuckoff.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

9:26pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Stroppy_gramps says...

can you guys just stop?

or if you feel the need to continue get a room?
can you guys just stop? or if you feel the need to continue get a room? Stroppy_gramps

9:26pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Puddletown Saint wrote:
Hey guys - there was a football match today that we won:

Davis 7 Calming
Clyne 8 Future England
Shaw 8 Now England
Fonte 7 Improving
Yosida 7 Steady
Punch 8 Impressive
Lallana 7 Hope he is okay
Cork 8 Makes the difference
Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion
Lambert 7 Team player
Jay Rod 7 His best game
Gaston 7 More central
Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception

2 weeks seems a long time COYR
Pretty spot on!

Plus Guly did exactly what he was brought on to do, keeping the pressure off, and could have won it earlier. Good performance.
[quote][p][bold]Puddletown Saint[/bold] wrote: Hey guys - there was a football match today that we won: Davis 7 Calming Clyne 8 Future England Shaw 8 Now England Fonte 7 Improving Yosida 7 Steady Punch 8 Impressive Lallana 7 Hope he is okay Cork 8 Makes the difference Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion Lambert 7 Team player Jay Rod 7 His best game Gaston 7 More central Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception 2 weeks seems a long time COYR[/p][/quote]Pretty spot on! Plus Guly did exactly what he was brought on to do, keeping the pressure off, and could have won it earlier. Good performance. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

9:30pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

Stroppy_gramps wrote:
can you guys just stop?

or if you feel the need to continue get a room?
i suggest you report any post you feel is abusive , that's what i do .
[quote][p][bold]Stroppy_gramps[/bold] wrote: can you guys just stop? or if you feel the need to continue get a room?[/p][/quote]i suggest you report any post you feel is abusive , that's what i do . slugger

9:31pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh










!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin









g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t angus mc coatup

9:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Fuckoff.
Oh seed! Can't raise the flag! Trying to compensate! Easy to say that over the Internet! Not as easy to say to a big bugger's face! You're a joke!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint![/p][/quote]Fuckoff.[/p][/quote]Oh seed! Can't raise the flag! Trying to compensate! Easy to say that over the Internet! Not as easy to say to a big bugger's face! You're a joke! Bring back Branfoot

9:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh











!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin










g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol Bring back Branfoot

9:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12

mark5 says...

Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A mark5

9:37pm Sat 8 Dec 12

pompey in spain says...

now now now...are you all having a go at each other!! for what its worth badd bill isnt that bad, and seedhouse is funny, but its got to be said of late both and a few others have not let their funny sides out when putting people down ...personally i thought its coz the pressure of the way your season was going ..so understandable.lots more to come boys.
now now now...are you all having a go at each other!! for what its worth badd bill isnt that bad, and seedhouse is funny, but its got to be said of late both and a few others have not let their funny sides out when putting people down ...personally i thought its coz the pressure of the way your season was going ..so understandable.lots more to come boys. pompey in spain

9:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh












!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin











g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy! Bring back Branfoot

9:43pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

mark5 wrote:
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
[quote][p][bold]mark5[/bold] wrote: Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A[/p][/quote]cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ? slugger

9:43pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh













!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin












g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
Nighty night, Mr Trump!
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy![/p][/quote]Nighty night, Mr Trump! Bring back Branfoot

9:45pm Sat 8 Dec 12

popper says...

this is all down to Nigel Adkins and his management.
He has instilled a commarardary between Puncheon and Clyne. When one makes a mistake, the other covers. When one takes a risk and does a run, the other covers.
They are friends knowing they are more when they work together.
When Punchon scored the first thing he did was point to his mucker Clyne.
Nigle understands how to get the best out of a previously stroppy Puncheon.
Make him part of a mini team. He may not want to do the best for himself but will never let hs friend Clyne down. Its working time and time again.
Onwards and upwards with this group of players and Nigel getting the best out of them
this is all down to Nigel Adkins and his management. He has instilled a commarardary between Puncheon and Clyne. When one makes a mistake, the other covers. When one takes a risk and does a run, the other covers. They are friends knowing they are more when they work together. When Punchon scored the first thing he did was point to his mucker Clyne. Nigle understands how to get the best out of a previously stroppy Puncheon. Make him part of a mini team. He may not want to do the best for himself but will never let hs friend Clyne down. Its working time and time again. Onwards and upwards with this group of players and Nigel getting the best out of them popper

9:48pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh












!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin











g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Is that it, is that your clever and very witty reponse.


anyway football,can't fault anyone today
and good to see kelvin back.the back four looked tight an very much together.
the work in progress sign is still up,but we are getting there.and fontes response to the booing of gully was great.
coyr
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Is that it, is that your clever and very witty reponse. anyway football,can't fault anyone today and good to see kelvin back.the back four looked tight an very much together. the work in progress sign is still up,but we are getting there.and fontes response to the booing of gully was great. coyr angus mc coatup

9:49pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

He's lost it again...

...anyway...onto football...I'm rather proud about the way NA has conducted himself this season. He's stuck to the task and ignored the 'sack race' ****.

So far so good...if improvement gathers pace, then a mid table place should be assured.

My bet is looking safe ghk! :0)
He's lost it again... ...anyway...onto football...I'm rather proud about the way NA has conducted himself this season. He's stuck to the task and ignored the 'sack race' ****. So far so good...if improvement gathers pace, then a mid table place should be assured. My bet is looking safe ghk! :0) Baddesley Bill

9:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12

mark5 says...

slugger wrote:
mark5 wrote:
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mark5[/bold] wrote: Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A[/p][/quote]cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?[/p][/quote]Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha. mark5

9:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Confucious says...

Thanks Saints. That 15th place looks good tonight. Match of the Day and Football First are on record for repeat performances tomorrow - and the Sunday papers will be savoured this week.

Guly's reception the one downside, but his excellent performance despite that must have embarrassed any of the boo boys capable of rational thought. Well done Guly - that takes guts.

And to top it all there's only one WUM on here and he seems particularly stupid as a lone looney. Tomorrow morning he should go down to morgue and say "I think I'm ready."
Thanks Saints. That 15th place looks good tonight. Match of the Day and Football First are on record for repeat performances tomorrow - and the Sunday papers will be savoured this week. Guly's reception the one downside, but his excellent performance despite that must have embarrassed any of the boo boys capable of rational thought. Well done Guly - that takes guts. And to top it all there's only one WUM on here and he seems particularly stupid as a lone looney. Tomorrow morning he should go down to morgue and say "I think I'm ready." Confucious

9:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

pompey in spain wrote:
now now now...are you all having a go at each other!! for what its worth badd bill isnt that bad, and seedhouse is funny, but its got to be said of late both and a few others have not let their funny sides out when putting people down ...personally i thought its coz the pressure of the way your season was going ..so understandable.lots more to come boys.
It is quite tense. Games come about - QPR away, Reading at home - that have to be won or we'd be adrift. They have been won and a great win against Newcastle and an ok point against Norwich. Crap at Liverpool but back to winning ways today. We're giving ourselves a good chance.
[quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: now now now...are you all having a go at each other!! for what its worth badd bill isnt that bad, and seedhouse is funny, but its got to be said of late both and a few others have not let their funny sides out when putting people down ...personally i thought its coz the pressure of the way your season was going ..so understandable.lots more to come boys.[/p][/quote]It is quite tense. Games come about - QPR away, Reading at home - that have to be won or we'd be adrift. They have been won and a great win against Newcastle and an ok point against Norwich. Crap at Liverpool but back to winning ways today. We're giving ourselves a good chance. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

9:58pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh















!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin














g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
Nighty night, Mr Trump!
By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy![/p][/quote]Nighty night, Mr Trump![/p][/quote]By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce![/p][/quote]I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie" angus mc coatup

9:59pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Bring back Branfoot says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
















!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin















g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
Nighty night, Mr Trump!
By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"
As I thought! It's chicken tonight! Go count your Monoply money, pleb!
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy![/p][/quote]Nighty night, Mr Trump![/p][/quote]By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce![/p][/quote]I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"[/p][/quote]As I thought! It's chicken tonight! Go count your Monoply money, pleb! Bring back Branfoot

10:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh















!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin














g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
Nighty night, Mr Trump!
By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
I reckon it's time for the old feather dusters at 200 yards at dawn again.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy![/p][/quote]Nighty night, Mr Trump![/p][/quote]By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce![/p][/quote]I reckon it's time for the old feather dusters at 200 yards at dawn again. OSPREYSAINT

10:04pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh

















!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
















g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
feckin tw@t
Prat! Lol
Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
Nighty night, Mr Trump!
By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"
As I thought! It's chicken tonight! Go count your Monoply money, pleb!
more money than you can dream of fella
so I can just sit back and laugh at you calling.... me a pleb !... now that is funny
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.[/p][/quote]Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead![/p][/quote]you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking. lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob[/p][/quote]And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus![/p][/quote]how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .[/p][/quote]Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol[/p][/quote]On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one![/p][/quote]you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out. feckin tw@t[/p][/quote]Prat! Lol[/p][/quote]Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy![/p][/quote]Nighty night, Mr Trump![/p][/quote]By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce![/p][/quote]I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"[/p][/quote]As I thought! It's chicken tonight! Go count your Monoply money, pleb![/p][/quote]more money than you can dream of fella so I can just sit back and laugh at you calling.... me a pleb !... now that is funny angus mc coatup

10:08pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Velleity says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
As I said before, I don't see anyone (bar your friends Kent, Moreglory and Scooter) telling you that you're funny.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint![/p][/quote]As I said before, I don't see anyone (bar your friends Kent, Moreglory and Scooter) telling you that you're funny. Velleity

10:10pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Scrutinizer says...

Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!

P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes. Scrutinizer

10:11pm Sat 8 Dec 12

slugger says...

mark5 wrote:
slugger wrote:
mark5 wrote:
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.
piece of cake this managing lark eh ? ........ what do you reckon to our trolls ............ dumb or what ? ...... good luck to the albion , after all your club has been been through you've come out the other end with your heads held high because it's been done honestly without ripping anyone else off .......... totally the opposite of our eastern neighbors ....... they just cheat and cheat and cheat !
[quote][p][bold]mark5[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mark5[/bold] wrote: Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A[/p][/quote]cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?[/p][/quote]Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.[/p][/quote]piece of cake this managing lark eh ? ........ what do you reckon to our trolls ............ dumb or what ? ...... good luck to the albion , after all your club has been been through you've come out the other end with your heads held high because it's been done honestly without ripping anyone else off .......... totally the opposite of our eastern neighbors ....... they just cheat and cheat and cheat ! slugger

10:12pm Sat 8 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Scrutinizer wrote:
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!

P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.
[quote][p][bold]Scrutinizer[/bold] wrote: Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.[/p][/quote]yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well. angus mc coatup

10:20pm Sat 8 Dec 12

One Heart....One Vision says...

Today's result was made even better cosidering team around us dropped points at home....one well done Jason for another winning goal.
Today's result was made even better cosidering team around us dropped points at home....one well done Jason for another winning goal. One Heart....One Vision

10:26pm Sat 8 Dec 12

BracknellSaint says...

Funny eh
We get a shedload of various saints fans on here, and the skunts all seem obsessed with multiple personas. why would we need that? We're a top flight, biggest south coast , and superior league position for most of last 40-50 years CLUB.
When THEY can get 24k plus regular in League 1, 28k plus in the championship, and like now, 32k easily every week in the Premier, maybe they can take the Michael.
As it is, we've got plenty of fans thanks( unlike the blue few) so we can get a whole thread with loads of people, without needing to cheat..
Which the skunts are absolute experts at, after all !
Funny eh We get a shedload of various saints fans on here, and the skunts all seem obsessed with multiple personas. why would we need that? We're a top flight, biggest south coast , and superior league position for most of last 40-50 years CLUB. When THEY can get 24k plus regular in League 1, 28k plus in the championship, and like now, 32k easily every week in the Premier, maybe they can take the Michael. As it is, we've got plenty of fans thanks( unlike the blue few) so we can get a whole thread with loads of people, without needing to cheat.. Which the skunts are absolute experts at, after all ! BracknellSaint

10:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12

Optimist says...

Every game looks winnable again :)

happy days,

COYS!
Every game looks winnable again :) happy days, COYS! Optimist

11:23pm Sat 8 Dec 12

SnapperSaint says...

Hooray!!! At last I've got to end of all the quote on quote 'love' sessions above...nearly broke my mouse wheel...!

Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's.
Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff!
Hooray!!! At last I've got to end of all the quote on quote 'love' sessions above...nearly broke my mouse wheel...! Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's. Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff! SnapperSaint

12:15am Sun 9 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

SnapperSaint wrote:
Hooray!!! At last I've got to end of all the quote on quote 'love' sessions above...nearly broke my mouse wheel...!

Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's.
Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff!
yeah! sorry people I'm probably the biggest culprit,at responding to these idiots. but that bbb really is a nob.

anyway the way we played today was sensible. and very professional in the way we saw the game through.mr adkins and the team appear to be finding their feet at this level.and the only way is up.
[quote][p][bold]SnapperSaint[/bold] wrote: Hooray!!! At last I've got to end of all the quote on quote 'love' sessions above...nearly broke my mouse wheel...! Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's. Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff![/p][/quote]yeah! sorry people I'm probably the biggest culprit,at responding to these idiots. but that bbb really is a nob. anyway the way we played today was sensible. and very professional in the way we saw the game through.mr adkins and the team appear to be finding their feet at this level.and the only way is up. angus mc coatup

12:34am Sun 9 Dec 12

Bungy53 says...

toutlaw wrote:
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager?

The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager.

Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't.

He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch.

Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring.

Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip.

As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out,

Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever.

COYS
[quote][p][bold]toutlaw[/bold] wrote: Great performance. To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at? He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality[/p][/quote]When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager? The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager. Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't. He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch. Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring. Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip. As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out, Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever. COYS Bungy53

1:58am Sun 9 Dec 12

st1halo says...

toutlaw wrote:
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
I agree
Guly may have played well today in the SHORT time he was on but, had he started, i expect it would have been an entirely different story. He's a striker who hasn't scored in a year! and yet amazingly until recently has featured in most games. Imo he isn't prem quality but I'm happy for him to prove me wrong. Booing isn't acceptable though- full stop!!
Fonte seems to get stronger and stronger every game and stepping up which is great to see.
Luke Shaw..... what can you say.... that boy has 100% Premiership quality stamped all over him already!
The bus is rolling!


STID
[quote][p][bold]toutlaw[/bold] wrote: Great performance. To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at? He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality[/p][/quote]I agree Guly may have played well today in the SHORT time he was on but, had he started, i expect it would have been an entirely different story. He's a striker who hasn't scored in a year! and yet amazingly until recently has featured in most games. Imo he isn't prem quality but I'm happy for him to prove me wrong. Booing isn't acceptable though- full stop!! Fonte seems to get stronger and stronger every game and stepping up which is great to see. Luke Shaw..... what can you say.... that boy has 100% Premiership quality stamped all over him already! The bus is rolling! STID st1halo

2:11am Sun 9 Dec 12

st1halo says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.
Don't know what's going on there, Sunderland have some quality players and O'neill usually builds strong teams. (he always looks like some sort of pervert PE teacher or something though)
Nick 3 points from them and we'll be making serious progress!

STID
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.[/p][/quote]Don't know what's going on there, Sunderland have some quality players and O'neill usually builds strong teams. (he always looks like some sort of pervert PE teacher or something though) Nick 3 points from them and we'll be making serious progress! STID st1halo

2:50am Sun 9 Dec 12

ButtyIoWSaint says...

Scrutinizer wrote:
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!

P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
EiEiEi O
Up the premier league we go
[quote][p][bold]Scrutinizer[/bold] wrote: Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.[/p][/quote]EiEiEi O Up the premier league we go ButtyIoWSaint

2:50am Sun 9 Dec 12

st1halo says...

Bungy53 wrote:
toutlaw wrote:
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager?

The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager.

Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't.

He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch.

Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring.

Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip.

As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out,

Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever.

COYS
Here's a thought
Read the post - quote the post - agree/disagree with the post
It's as simple as that!
Making personal references as to whether they may be one of the blue few,new fan, new poster is entirely pointless.
The reason that you have had to read through a load of dross above is that some seem unable to remain impersonal and by inserting these innuendos into your posts is exactly how it all begins.
I don't agree that Guly has delivered on all counts because as a striker, he hasn't scored for a year. (I don't condone booing!)
I do agree that we are moving in the right direction though and hope that continues


STID
[quote][p][bold]Bungy53[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]toutlaw[/bold] wrote: Great performance. To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at? He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality[/p][/quote]When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager? The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager. Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't. He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch. Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring. Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip. As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out, Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever. COYS[/p][/quote]Here's a thought Read the post - quote the post - agree/disagree with the post It's as simple as that! Making personal references as to whether they may be one of the blue few,new fan, new poster is entirely pointless. The reason that you have had to read through a load of dross above is that some seem unable to remain impersonal and by inserting these innuendos into your posts is exactly how it all begins. I don't agree that Guly has delivered on all counts because as a striker, he hasn't scored for a year. (I don't condone booing!) I do agree that we are moving in the right direction though and hope that continues STID st1halo

7:16am Sun 9 Dec 12

Velleity says...

I think one of the reasons Guly hasn't scored in a year is that he hasn't been played as a striker in that time; he's been shifted to midfield. He's good as a midfielder but not as good as purely up front.

Yesterday he was put up as a striker and I thought we saw the difference.

Whether I'm right or wrong, I'll repeat myself. Booing a player coming onto the pitch is NEVER going to help your team.
I think one of the reasons Guly hasn't scored in a year is that he hasn't been played as a striker in that time; he's been shifted to midfield. He's good as a midfielder but not as good as purely up front. Yesterday he was put up as a striker and I thought we saw the difference. Whether I'm right or wrong, I'll repeat myself. Booing a player coming onto the pitch is NEVER going to help your team. Velleity

8:22am Sun 9 Dec 12

Clever Dick says...

Great result. Not the best game we have played but nobody played badly. Booing of Guly was a disgrace.Well done to Jose Fonte for trying to get the crowd on his side. Both Nigel and NC have taken a lot of flack on and off ever since they arrived and they have always been proven to be right in the end. If NA sees something we don't in Guly I'm happy to let him prove it to us. Good on them too for kissing and making up with Punch. Most of us would have been happy to see the back of him and he's a different player this season. Onwards and upwards. COYR&ALBOW!
Great result. Not the best game we have played but nobody played badly. Booing of Guly was a disgrace.Well done to Jose Fonte for trying to get the crowd on his side. Both Nigel and NC have taken a lot of flack on and off ever since they arrived and they have always been proven to be right in the end. If NA sees something we don't in Guly I'm happy to let him prove it to us. Good on them too for kissing and making up with Punch. Most of us would have been happy to see the back of him and he's a different player this season. Onwards and upwards. COYR&ALBOW! Clever Dick

9:09am Sun 9 Dec 12

St Retford says...

Clever Dick wrote:
Great result. Not the best game we have played but nobody played badly. Booing of Guly was a disgrace.Well done to Jose Fonte for trying to get the crowd on his side. Both Nigel and NC have taken a lot of flack on and off ever since they arrived and they have always been proven to be right in the end. If NA sees something we don't in Guly I'm happy to let him prove it to us. Good on them too for kissing and making up with Punch. Most of us would have been happy to see the back of him and he's a different player this season. Onwards and upwards. COYR&ALBOW!
Innit. One thing these past couple of years have taught us is that if you disagree with Nigel or Nicola it's usually because you're wrong.
[quote][p][bold]Clever Dick[/bold] wrote: Great result. Not the best game we have played but nobody played badly. Booing of Guly was a disgrace.Well done to Jose Fonte for trying to get the crowd on his side. Both Nigel and NC have taken a lot of flack on and off ever since they arrived and they have always been proven to be right in the end. If NA sees something we don't in Guly I'm happy to let him prove it to us. Good on them too for kissing and making up with Punch. Most of us would have been happy to see the back of him and he's a different player this season. Onwards and upwards. COYR&ALBOW![/p][/quote]Innit. One thing these past couple of years have taught us is that if you disagree with Nigel or Nicola it's usually because you're wrong. St Retford

9:15am Sun 9 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.
Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out. OSPREYSAINT

9:32am Sun 9 Dec 12

Buddy SFC says...

Luke Shaw = Class !!!

The whole Reading game plan was to go deep to Roberts into the Saints LH corner, not only did he cope he played JR out of the game .........

Also Fonte giving the crowd in Kingsland stick for the way they reacted to Guly coming on , and applauding the Northam for singing up for Guly ......... A real team man !!

Just proves how they are a team ''all as one'' !!
Luke Shaw = Class !!! The whole Reading game plan was to go deep to Roberts into the Saints LH corner, not only did he cope he played JR out of the game ......... Also Fonte giving the crowd in Kingsland stick for the way they reacted to Guly coming on , and applauding the Northam for singing up for Guly ......... A real team man !! Just proves how they are a team ''all as one'' !! Buddy SFC

9:40am Sun 9 Dec 12

Scarborosaint says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.
Totally agree evened out and fair play to tabb who didn't make a meal of the challenge just picked himself up after the tackle.
The booing of one of our own players is becoming embarrassing and disgraceful regardless of how good, bad or indifferent guly is he is pulling on the saints shirt he deserves and needs encouragement.
Bet the same muppets who booed him yesterday were cheering a year ago when he scored both goals to beat middlesborough , go and support the skates cos they need some more supporters we certainly don't want you if you can't support the boys wearing red and White ( pinstripes)
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.[/p][/quote]Totally agree evened out and fair play to tabb who didn't make a meal of the challenge just picked himself up after the tackle. The booing of one of our own players is becoming embarrassing and disgraceful regardless of how good, bad or indifferent guly is he is pulling on the saints shirt he deserves and needs encouragement. Bet the same muppets who booed him yesterday were cheering a year ago when he scored both goals to beat middlesborough , go and support the skates cos they need some more supporters we certainly don't want you if you can't support the boys wearing red and White ( pinstripes) Scarborosaint

9:42am Sun 9 Dec 12

mark5 says...

slugger wrote:
mark5 wrote:
slugger wrote:
mark5 wrote:
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.
piece of cake this managing lark eh ? ........ what do you reckon to our trolls ............ dumb or what ? ...... good luck to the albion , after all your club has been been through you've come out the other end with your heads held high because it's been done honestly without ripping anyone else off .......... totally the opposite of our eastern neighbors ....... they just cheat and cheat and cheat !
Thanks for the compliment Slugger, yes we really have been through the Mill in recent times, losing the Goldstone, exile at Gillingham and then 10 years in the wind and rain at Withdean with a capacity of 8,000. So it is good to he where we are today. Don't think I should be drawn into the "debate" about Pompey though, we have no axes to grind with them. However, Croydon F.C is another story...............
.!! Ha,ha,ha Good luck for your season, mid table or thereabouts seems achievable to me and that would be a great achievement first season back in the Prem!!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mark5[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mark5[/bold] wrote: Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A[/p][/quote]cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?[/p][/quote]Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.[/p][/quote]piece of cake this managing lark eh ? ........ what do you reckon to our trolls ............ dumb or what ? ...... good luck to the albion , after all your club has been been through you've come out the other end with your heads held high because it's been done honestly without ripping anyone else off .......... totally the opposite of our eastern neighbors ....... they just cheat and cheat and cheat ![/p][/quote]Thanks for the compliment Slugger, yes we really have been through the Mill in recent times, losing the Goldstone, exile at Gillingham and then 10 years in the wind and rain at Withdean with a capacity of 8,000. So it is good to he where we are today. Don't think I should be drawn into the "debate" about Pompey though, we have no axes to grind with them. However, Croydon F.C is another story............... .!! Ha,ha,ha Good luck for your season, mid table or thereabouts seems achievable to me and that would be a great achievement first season back in the Prem!! mark5

10:00am Sun 9 Dec 12

Ross123 says...

anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table! Ross123

10:04am Sun 9 Dec 12

SnapperSaint says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.
Agreed, that's just the way I saw it on MOTD...balanced out...
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.[/p][/quote]Agreed, that's just the way I saw it on MOTD...balanced out... SnapperSaint

10:10am Sun 9 Dec 12

St Retford says...

Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
It's Rickie's birthday so they've all been given permission to have a day out at Alton Towers instead.
[quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]It's Rickie's birthday so they've all been given permission to have a day out at Alton Towers instead. St Retford

10:14am Sun 9 Dec 12

Confucious says...

Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
[quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament? Confucious

10:15am Sun 9 Dec 12

SnapperSaint says...

St Retford wrote:
Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
It's Rickie's birthday so they've all been given permission to have a day out at Alton Towers instead.
Yeah and Raffa has bottled it having seen how good Saints are playing now...
he doesn't want Chelsea to play us until he's got them playing better and he's taken them off to Japan for the week...
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]It's Rickie's birthday so they've all been given permission to have a day out at Alton Towers instead.[/p][/quote]Yeah and Raffa has bottled it having seen how good Saints are playing now... he doesn't want Chelsea to play us until he's got them playing better and he's taken them off to Japan for the week... SnapperSaint

10:16am Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

Don't feed the WUM. It might be a self proclaimed comedy genius with a massive ego and delusions of grandeur that doesn't actually attend games but that doesn't seem to stop it.

Ssssshhhuusshhh is the way forward.
Don't feed the WUM. It might be a self proclaimed comedy genius with a massive ego and delusions of grandeur that doesn't actually attend games but that doesn't seem to stop it. Ssssshhhuusshhh is the way forward. puppy saint

10:17am Sun 9 Dec 12

St Retford says...

Confucious wrote:
Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
Oh yeah - that might also be a factor.
[quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?[/p][/quote]Oh yeah - that might also be a factor. St Retford

10:27am Sun 9 Dec 12

St Retford says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
Scrutinizer wrote:
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!

P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.
I'm not so sure. Has anyone noticed how our improvement in form has coincided with us playing under floodlights? I think that little grey stripe does something under artificial lights which makes the white stripe stand out more and the shirts seem altogether more vibrant and therefore it becomes easier for the players to pick each other out. I know it sounds mental but I swear there's some proper science going on with our shirt design.
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Scrutinizer[/bold] wrote: Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.[/p][/quote]yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.[/p][/quote]I'm not so sure. Has anyone noticed how our improvement in form has coincided with us playing under floodlights? I think that little grey stripe does something under artificial lights which makes the white stripe stand out more and the shirts seem altogether more vibrant and therefore it becomes easier for the players to pick each other out. I know it sounds mental but I swear there's some proper science going on with our shirt design. St Retford

10:30am Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

St Retford wrote:
Confucious wrote:
Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
Oh yeah - that might also be a factor.
Utter b%llocks. Torrez, Matter, Tevez and Cheque are all injured and Chelsea have paid £3 million to each of the Premier League committee to call it off. You lot know nothing about football and are a bunch of dearie petal embarrassments. Innit!
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?[/p][/quote]Oh yeah - that might also be a factor.[/p][/quote]Utter b%llocks. Torrez, Matter, Tevez and Cheque are all injured and Chelsea have paid £3 million to each of the Premier League committee to call it off. You lot know nothing about football and are a bunch of dearie petal embarrassments. Innit! puppy saint

10:34am Sun 9 Dec 12

St Retford says...

Haha!
Haha! St Retford

10:39am Sun 9 Dec 12

Buddy SFC says...

St Retford wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Scrutinizer wrote: Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.
I'm not so sure. Has anyone noticed how our improvement in form has coincided with us playing under floodlights? I think that little grey stripe does something under artificial lights which makes the white stripe stand out more and the shirts seem altogether more vibrant and therefore it becomes easier for the players to pick each other out. I know it sounds mental but I swear there's some proper science going on with our shirt design.
No just mental ! :-)
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Scrutinizer[/bold] wrote: Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.[/p][/quote]yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.[/p][/quote]I'm not so sure. Has anyone noticed how our improvement in form has coincided with us playing under floodlights? I think that little grey stripe does something under artificial lights which makes the white stripe stand out more and the shirts seem altogether more vibrant and therefore it becomes easier for the players to pick each other out. I know it sounds mental but I swear there's some proper science going on with our shirt design.[/p][/quote]No just mental ! :-) Buddy SFC

10:42am Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful ! slugger

10:44am Sun 9 Dec 12

batesieboy says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh



!
Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin


g friends whenever people respond to them.

Ssssshhhh.
You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Every argument on its merits. Don't get "pack mentality" confused with the majority usually being right. It is however, true, that there are people on here who think only their opinion (and that of their friends) is the only important one. You know who you are.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tye-Dye pt2[/bold] wrote: Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh ![/p][/quote]Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin g friends whenever people respond to them. Ssssshhhh.[/p][/quote]You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates![/p][/quote]Every argument on its merits. Don't get "pack mentality" confused with the majority usually being right. It is however, true, that there are people on here who think only their opinion (and that of their friends) is the only important one. You know who you are. batesieboy

10:55am Sun 9 Dec 12

Rob The Saint NOT in NZ says...

Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent.

Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.

The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!

Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".

A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.

It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.

Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.

COYR!
Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent. Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent. The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite! Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys". A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon. It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure. Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay. COYR! Rob The Saint NOT in NZ

11:13am Sun 9 Dec 12

PTID1898 says...

Oh my god get out of the bottom three and all of a sudden you lot think you are great and going to stay up get a grip,get a life get realistic your going down wake up all of you you won't or never will achieve anything or win anything.PUP
Oh my god get out of the bottom three and all of a sudden you lot think you are great and going to stay up get a grip,get a life get realistic your going down wake up all of you you won't or never will achieve anything or win anything.PUP PTID1898

11:15am Sun 9 Dec 12

Crispinmumbles says...

Come on, admit it world, we looked more comfortable and confident at the back with Kelvo twixt the sticks, if he was in to cover an injury, I just hope recuperation takes a while.
Come on, admit it world, we looked more comfortable and confident at the back with Kelvo twixt the sticks, if he was in to cover an injury, I just hope recuperation takes a while. Crispinmumbles

11:20am Sun 9 Dec 12

Crispinmumbles says...

PTID1898 wrote:
Oh my god get out of the bottom three and all of a sudden you lot think you are great and going to stay up get a grip,get a life get realistic your going down wake up all of you you won't or never will achieve anything or win anything.PUP
Does zis not strika you aza lil bit of ze graped that he is not so sweet nes pas (in french accent, rerally couldn't explain why)
[quote][p][bold]PTID1898[/bold] wrote: Oh my god get out of the bottom three and all of a sudden you lot think you are great and going to stay up get a grip,get a life get realistic your going down wake up all of you you won't or never will achieve anything or win anything.PUP[/p][/quote]Does zis not strika you aza lil bit of ze graped that he is not so sweet nes pas (in french accent, rerally couldn't explain why) Crispinmumbles

11:25am Sun 9 Dec 12

El Santo says...

Rob The Saint NOT in NZ wrote:
Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent.

Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.

The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!

Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".

A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.

It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.

Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.

COYR!
On the same line, Rob, I just read this in the BBC report of the match: "Roared on by vociferous home support at St Mary's, Saints started the second half impressively..."
It is certainly not something you read in every report. I do believe that support by fans is making a HUGE difference. We are also playing!!!
[quote][p][bold]Rob The Saint NOT in NZ[/bold] wrote: Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent. Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent. The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite! Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys". A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon. It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure. Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay. COYR![/p][/quote]On the same line, Rob, I just read this in the BBC report of the match: "Roared on by vociferous home support at St Mary's, Saints started the second half impressively..." It is certainly not something you read in every report. I do believe that support by fans is making a HUGE difference. We are also playing!!! El Santo

11:25am Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

If I didn't have anything good to say about my team and was slightly embarrassed by their current situation then I would probably go onto a rivals site and attempt to destroy their buzz with some devastating, articulate, accurate and withering ridicule.

But I have, I'm not so I won't.
If I didn't have anything good to say about my team and was slightly embarrassed by their current situation then I would probably go onto a rivals site and attempt to destroy their buzz with some devastating, articulate, accurate and withering ridicule. But I have, I'm not so I won't. puppy saint

11:30am Sun 9 Dec 12

RedArmy1 says...

El Santo wrote:
Rob The Saint NOT in NZ wrote:
Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent.

Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.

The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!

Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".

A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.

It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.

Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.

COYR!
On the same line, Rob, I just read this in the BBC report of the match: "Roared on by vociferous home support at St Mary's, Saints started the second half impressively..."
It is certainly not something you read in every report. I do believe that support by fans is making a HUGE difference. We are also playing!!!
THE FANS ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE.

Let's take the tempo to the game vs sunderland and fulham away.

Let's get the leadership going to drive the fans to continue to give that vociferous support.

WINNING IS EVERYTHING.

WE ARE RED ARMY. COYR.
[quote][p][bold]El Santo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rob The Saint NOT in NZ[/bold] wrote: Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent. Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent. The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite! Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys". A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon. It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure. Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay. COYR![/p][/quote]On the same line, Rob, I just read this in the BBC report of the match: "Roared on by vociferous home support at St Mary's, Saints started the second half impressively..." It is certainly not something you read in every report. I do believe that support by fans is making a HUGE difference. We are also playing!!![/p][/quote]THE FANS ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE. Let's take the tempo to the game vs sunderland and fulham away. Let's get the leadership going to drive the fans to continue to give that vociferous support. WINNING IS EVERYTHING. WE ARE RED ARMY. COYR. RedArmy1

11:45am Sun 9 Dec 12

up saints says...

yes i agree and i will admit iam not the biggest fan of guly.but hats off to him he did his bit yesterday but was nervous when he came on.mom punch need llalana fit asap.
yes i agree and i will admit iam not the biggest fan of guly.but hats off to him he did his bit yesterday but was nervous when he came on.mom punch need llalana fit asap. up saints

11:52am Sun 9 Dec 12

thehoggsback says...

Fantastic result yesterday we're beginning to see saints hold there own and escaping relegation is more than possible that's what the skunts have seen as well that's why there overly abusive by the day just keep ignoring them and roll on 14.12.12 when they finally f**k off. COYR
Fantastic result yesterday we're beginning to see saints hold there own and escaping relegation is more than possible that's what the skunts have seen as well that's why there overly abusive by the day just keep ignoring them and roll on 14.12.12 when they finally f**k off. COYR thehoggsback

11:54am Sun 9 Dec 12

hedge end bob says...

I am disappointed after such a big big win for us yesturday, there is so much RUBBISH posted on this site.
When one of the skates or wums that come on here, to just wind people up , JUST IGNORE THE FOOLS. The beano and dandy have better written topics than some of the tripe that's put on here. Who really cares whose dad can beat your dad?? Yes that's how it reads, fed up with it.

PUNCH....That's the way to do it !!!
Well done Gully, played centred he is as good if not better than J R.

Bing on Sunderland another three points.
I am disappointed after such a big big win for us yesturday, there is so much RUBBISH posted on this site. When one of the skates or wums that come on here, to just wind people up , JUST IGNORE THE FOOLS. The beano and dandy have better written topics than some of the tripe that's put on here. Who really cares whose dad can beat your dad?? Yes that's how it reads, fed up with it. PUNCH....That's the way to do it !!! Well done Gully, played centred he is as good if not better than J R. Bing on Sunderland another three points. hedge end bob

12:04pm Sun 9 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Confucious wrote:
Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
Well then, why don't we just pop over there and give them a game there?
Yosh and Tad could pop indoors and see some mates and the lads could eat some uncooked meat, sushi.
We used to feed Terry Hurlock on raw meat!
[quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?[/p][/quote]Well then, why don't we just pop over there and give them a game there? Yosh and Tad could pop indoors and see some mates and the lads could eat some uncooked meat, sushi. We used to feed Terry Hurlock on raw meat! dadofmy3sons

12:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12

circa 66 saint says...

haven't posted for a while mainly because of the flu and partly because the shhhhhhhhhh campaign seems to have stopped.
just an idea but for those that wish to interact with a skunt why not go to the news and do it and return this site to the clean and proper place it can and has been
shshshshshshshshshss
sshhhhhhhh
you know it makes sense
haven't posted for a while mainly because of the flu and partly because the shhhhhhhhhh campaign seems to have stopped. just an idea but for those that wish to interact with a skunt why not go to the news and do it and return this site to the clean and proper place it can and has been shshshshshshshshshss sshhhhhhhh you know it makes sense circa 66 saint

12:17pm Sun 9 Dec 12

thehoggsback says...

I'm going to enjoy watching Sun v Read Tues that ball will be like a hot potato draw 0-0 would be nice COYR.
I'm going to enjoy watching Sun v Read Tues that ball will be like a hot potato draw 0-0 would be nice COYR. thehoggsback

12:24pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

puppy saint wrote:
If I didn't have anything good to say about my team and was slightly embarrassed by their current situation then I would probably go onto a rivals site and attempt to destroy their buzz with some devastating, articulate, accurate and withering ridicule. But I have, I'm not so I won't.
Says a lot about you Poppy. I see you are crying out for a bit of attention, so here we are.

Well a win yesterday. The Faiiries were the best team, but you got a lot of luck with that penalty. Bad decision by the referee, not a corker at all.

It would have been interesting to come on here, and watch the debate if you had only got a draw. I guess as it was your man of the moment that made the mistake, he can be forgiven.

The disssallowed goal made perfect sense to me, so just accept your luck.

The boo boys I guess won't be staying around when things get tough.


A little present for your fellow wife Belinda

http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=rNVcSIZyB
uE

Not the same comic effect as yours, but it really does show how these things can take over. The rolling / running tumbleweed also reminds me of your stadium after the 70th minute.

One thing that you maybe did not know, is that tumbleweed actually came from cold Russia via Flax seeds.

Which reminds me, It's gonna be a long hard winter for you guys. Enjoy your sunday roast or is it beans on toast today.

Let's hope you guys aint too rusty for the Sunderland game.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH


41,10,1,58,4
[quote][p][bold]puppy saint[/bold] wrote: If I didn't have anything good to say about my team and was slightly embarrassed by their current situation then I would probably go onto a rivals site and attempt to destroy their buzz with some devastating, articulate, accurate and withering ridicule. But I have, I'm not so I won't.[/p][/quote]Says a lot about you Poppy. I see you are crying out for a bit of attention, so here we are. Well a win yesterday. The Faiiries were the best team, but you got a lot of luck with that penalty. Bad decision by the referee, not a corker at all. It would have been interesting to come on here, and watch the debate if you had only got a draw. I guess as it was your man of the moment that made the mistake, he can be forgiven. The disssallowed goal made perfect sense to me, so just accept your luck. The boo boys I guess won't be staying around when things get tough. A little present for your fellow wife Belinda http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=rNVcSIZyB uE Not the same comic effect as yours, but it really does show how these things can take over. The rolling / running tumbleweed also reminds me of your stadium after the 70th minute. One thing that you maybe did not know, is that tumbleweed actually came from cold Russia via Flax seeds. Which reminds me, It's gonna be a long hard winter for you guys. Enjoy your sunday roast or is it beans on toast today. Let's hope you guys aint too rusty for the Sunderland game. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH 41,10,1,58,4 More Glory

12:25pm Sun 9 Dec 12

bluewhiteandred says...

slugger wrote:
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
Baddesley bill or slugger
you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please


YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful ![/p][/quote]Baddesley bill or slugger you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !” bluewhiteandred

12:30pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

bluewhiteandred wrote:
slugger wrote:
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
Baddesley bill or slugger
you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please


YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”
sorry but i have no idea who it is , i do agree that it's wrong though .
[quote][p][bold]bluewhiteandred[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful ![/p][/quote]Baddesley bill or slugger you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”[/p][/quote]sorry but i have no idea who it is , i do agree that it's wrong though . slugger

12:33pm Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

I love a nibble, Poppet x
I love a nibble, Poppet x puppy saint

12:36pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

on the jason puncheon subject i have to admit that i was one of the people saying "get rid of bad rubbish" last year , just like to put on record how happy i am to be proved very wrong .
on the jason puncheon subject i have to admit that i was one of the people saying "get rid of bad rubbish" last year , just like to put on record how happy i am to be proved very wrong . slugger

12:44pm Sun 9 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

bluewhiteandred wrote:
slugger wrote:
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
Baddesley bill or slugger
you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please


YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”
Steady lad, it's just a Forum, sticks and stones remember, don't respond.
[quote][p][bold]bluewhiteandred[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful ![/p][/quote]Baddesley bill or slugger you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”[/p][/quote]Steady lad, it's just a Forum, sticks and stones remember, don't respond. OSPREYSAINT

12:48pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

puppy saint wrote:
I love a nibble, Poppet x
overweight by any chance?
[quote][p][bold]puppy saint[/bold] wrote: I love a nibble, Poppet x[/p][/quote]overweight by any chance? More Glory

12:49pm Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

slugger wrote:
on the jason puncheon subject i have to admit that i was one of the people saying "get rid of bad rubbish" last year , just like to put on record how happy i am to be proved very wrong .
By his own admission he has matured over the last year. All credit to him, Adkins and Cortese. The chairman handled a potentially volatile situation very well. His own performances and the partnership he has built with Clynne have been one of the very positive features of our play this season.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: on the jason puncheon subject i have to admit that i was one of the people saying "get rid of bad rubbish" last year , just like to put on record how happy i am to be proved very wrong .[/p][/quote]By his own admission he has matured over the last year. All credit to him, Adkins and Cortese. The chairman handled a potentially volatile situation very well. His own performances and the partnership he has built with Clynne have been one of the very positive features of our play this season. puppy saint

12:53pm Sun 9 Dec 12

promised land says...

The part time fans who turn up at St Mary's and booed Guly ? Do you realise your actions are insulting to Adkins in his decision making. I'd rather have him as manager than your negative show of disproval.....
I believe Guly is far better in the centre than out wide hence comments from others saying yesterday he looked better.
The part time fans who turn up at St Mary's and booed Guly ? Do you realise your actions are insulting to Adkins in his decision making. I'd rather have him as manager than your negative show of disproval..... I believe Guly is far better in the centre than out wide hence comments from others saying yesterday he looked better. promised land

12:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Bluewhiteand red on the Echo site.
We all have handles, no one puts their real name up.
Not even you on either site.
Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies.
Same goes for Glory.
There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment.
Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage.
Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future.
Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you!
Support the Saints? I know I do !
Bluewhiteand red on the Echo site. We all have handles, no one puts their real name up. Not even you on either site. Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies. Same goes for Glory. There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment. Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage. Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future. Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you! Support the Saints? I know I do ! dadofmy3sons

12:59pm Sun 9 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

More gloria.
How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right?
Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD?
Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision.
So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team.
GO AWAY SILLY PERSON!
Support the Saints.
Support football?
I know I do .
More gloria. How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right? Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD? Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision. So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team. GO AWAY SILLY PERSON! Support the Saints. Support football? I know I do . dadofmy3sons

1:01pm Sun 9 Dec 12

circa 66 saint says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
Bluewhiteand red on the Echo site.
We all have handles, no one puts their real name up.
Not even you on either site.
Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies.
Same goes for Glory.
There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment.
Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage.
Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future.
Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you!
Support the Saints? I know I do !
agree, we will talk football with anyone who want's to even from the blue few, banter great but let's not get involved in the usual p1ssing match
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: Bluewhiteand red on the Echo site. We all have handles, no one puts their real name up. Not even you on either site. Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies. Same goes for Glory. There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment. Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage. Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future. Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you! Support the Saints? I know I do ![/p][/quote]agree, we will talk football with anyone who want's to even from the blue few, banter great but let's not get involved in the usual p1ssing match circa 66 saint

1:08pm Sun 9 Dec 12

toutlaw says...

Bungy53 wrote:
toutlaw wrote:
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager?

The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager.

Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't.

He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch.

Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring.

Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip.

As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out,

Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever.

COYS
yeah Adkins oops i'll just call him Nigel from now on. i have supported Saints all my life so i know that Guly scored some goals in the championship and league one but that doesn't mean he's good enough for the premier league does it? and we've given him chances already.
im not someone who just accepts everything in blind faith to the club, i think we're doing really well but Guly isn't good enough thats all im saying!
wouldn't you like to see a bit more of Mayuka? we spent a decent amount of money on him just to have him on the bench
[quote][p][bold]Bungy53[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]toutlaw[/bold] wrote: Great performance. To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at? He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality[/p][/quote]When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager? The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager. Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't. He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch. Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring. Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip. As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out, Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever. COYS[/p][/quote]yeah Adkins oops i'll just call him Nigel from now on. i have supported Saints all my life so i know that Guly scored some goals in the championship and league one but that doesn't mean he's good enough for the premier league does it? and we've given him chances already. im not someone who just accepts everything in blind faith to the club, i think we're doing really well but Guly isn't good enough thats all im saying! wouldn't you like to see a bit more of Mayuka? we spent a decent amount of money on him just to have him on the bench toutlaw

1:11pm Sun 9 Dec 12

dadofmy3sons says...

Regarding Punch.
I was one of the posters who said that if he didn't want try with Saints then let him go.
I never disputed his talent, Pardew announced him as likely to be a future hero.
In my opinion, he merely wanted to play in the Prem and didn't really care who for.
I think he may well still be of that mindset, but he plays for us and as long as he is included in the first team he will stay and fight for his place.
He likes the fans singing his praises and he knows that we have welcomed him back.
I just hope no one says into his ear that he could do even better because he may well believe that person and seek greener pastures and I don't think there is any better for him than SFC.
The team nets together really well and he is given licence to play his way here. He has made a realy good partnership with Clyne and that is something that every team needs on both wings.
My personal opinion is that as a team we need to be able to switch him to the left wing as a winger just once in a while and see if we can catch out a defence with a run and cross from the byeline for Jayrod or Ricky to head in from a run to the middle.
Spurs did it in a Europa league game for 30 minutes and they were devastating, then they went back to opposite flanks and wide players cutting in on favoured feet and the supply to the middle stopped and they conceded.
Jose has said that we have the skills to mix it up with short and long. The ability to switch to a winger with Adam and Punch doing crosses for a period would confuse most teams.
Just my opinion of course, a football subject instead of maligning other posters and biting comments.
Regarding Punch. I was one of the posters who said that if he didn't want try with Saints then let him go. I never disputed his talent, Pardew announced him as likely to be a future hero. In my opinion, he merely wanted to play in the Prem and didn't really care who for. I think he may well still be of that mindset, but he plays for us and as long as he is included in the first team he will stay and fight for his place. He likes the fans singing his praises and he knows that we have welcomed him back. I just hope no one says into his ear that he could do even better because he may well believe that person and seek greener pastures and I don't think there is any better for him than SFC. The team nets together really well and he is given licence to play his way here. He has made a realy good partnership with Clyne and that is something that every team needs on both wings. My personal opinion is that as a team we need to be able to switch him to the left wing as a winger just once in a while and see if we can catch out a defence with a run and cross from the byeline for Jayrod or Ricky to head in from a run to the middle. Spurs did it in a Europa league game for 30 minutes and they were devastating, then they went back to opposite flanks and wide players cutting in on favoured feet and the supply to the middle stopped and they conceded. Jose has said that we have the skills to mix it up with short and long. The ability to switch to a winger with Adam and Punch doing crosses for a period would confuse most teams. Just my opinion of course, a football subject instead of maligning other posters and biting comments. dadofmy3sons

1:15pm Sun 9 Dec 12

costa gaz says...

Yet another thread ruined by the usual suspects.
Some of you ought to reread some of your own comments, you'd realise what complete pericks you really are.
Seed have some time off mate...

Great result yesterday.
Yet another thread ruined by the usual suspects. Some of you ought to reread some of your own comments, you'd realise what complete pericks you really are. Seed have some time off mate... Great result yesterday. costa gaz

1:25pm Sun 9 Dec 12

7saint7 says...

For me since Luke shaw has came in to the first team for fox & Jack cork back in the team . It has made a huge impact on what was the worst defence in the prem .
The thing with Guly i don't blame fans for booing him as every time he comes on we drop points & it has made me question Adkins as a manager when he has been taking off players who are playing at there best off & bringing on Guly ....
When most people would bring off players who are not playing at there best & take them off & bring on some fresh legs..
Don't take what im saying the wrong way . I think Adkins is a good manager & should be be here till the end of season for sure . And i would never boo a saints player . even if it makes my hands go in to my face.
For me since Luke shaw has came in to the first team for fox & Jack cork back in the team . It has made a huge impact on what was the worst defence in the prem . The thing with Guly i don't blame fans for booing him as every time he comes on we drop points & it has made me question Adkins as a manager when he has been taking off players who are playing at there best off & bringing on Guly .... When most people would bring off players who are not playing at there best & take them off & bring on some fresh legs.. Don't take what im saying the wrong way . I think Adkins is a good manager & should be be here till the end of season for sure . And i would never boo a saints player . even if it makes my hands go in to my face. 7saint7

1:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
More gloria. How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right? Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD? Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision. So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team. GO AWAY SILLY PERSON! Support the Saints. Support football? I know I do .
Daddy-O

These decisions are made in a split second. If the ref sees a melee in the box, unless it is crystal clear, he will restart the game with the ball given to the defending side. Yes?

The Cork foul was very obviously and clearly a foul, no-one to impede the ref's decision, but you got lucky.

These things can even out over a season ie Shotton being sent off yesterday - what carp refereeing for that game. However with Man U conceding only 3 penalties in a decade recently, I do wonder what is going on with the top teams. see Italy

Until we get action replays - which amazingly Platini doesn't want - there will be inconsistency. Why doesn't Platini want action replays - anything to do with gambling I wonder?

I've watched my team for years, thanks - sillyboy


As I sad, the stripey's were the better team. Just chill out and enjoy it. Is there whiskey in the jar?

Support the Saints? I guess you are Saint Frankie. Well done for being somewhat sensible there, but here you have reverted to name calling.
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: More gloria. How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right? Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD? Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision. So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team. GO AWAY SILLY PERSON! Support the Saints. Support football? I know I do .[/p][/quote]Daddy-O These decisions are made in a split second. If the ref sees a melee in the box, unless it is crystal clear, he will restart the game with the ball given to the defending side. Yes? The Cork foul was very obviously and clearly a foul, no-one to impede the ref's decision, but you got lucky. These things can even out over a season ie Shotton being sent off yesterday - what carp refereeing for that game. However with Man U conceding only 3 penalties in a decade recently, I do wonder what is going on with the top teams. see Italy Until we get action replays - which amazingly Platini doesn't want - there will be inconsistency. Why doesn't Platini want action replays - anything to do with gambling I wonder? I've watched my team for years, thanks - sillyboy As I sad, the stripey's were the better team. Just chill out and enjoy it. Is there whiskey in the jar? Support the Saints? I guess you are Saint Frankie. Well done for being somewhat sensible there, but here you have reverted to name calling. More Glory

1:50pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.)

I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory.

COYR
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR Baddesley Bill

1:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Rising_Son says...

dadofmy3sons wrote:
Confucious wrote:
Ross123 wrote:
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?

looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
Well then, why don't we just pop over there and give them a game there?
Yosh and Tad could pop indoors and see some mates and the lads could eat some uncooked meat, sushi.
We used to feed Terry Hurlock on raw meat!
Uncooked meat? Take your pick, beef, horse, chicken or whale? Raw liver's just been banned.
[quote][p][bold]dadofmy3sons[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ross123[/bold] wrote: anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing? looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table![/p][/quote]Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?[/p][/quote]Well then, why don't we just pop over there and give them a game there? Yosh and Tad could pop indoors and see some mates and the lads could eat some uncooked meat, sushi. We used to feed Terry Hurlock on raw meat![/p][/quote]Uncooked meat? Take your pick, beef, horse, chicken or whale? Raw liver's just been banned. Rising_Son

2:43pm Sun 9 Dec 12

TEBOURBA says...

1 - 0 is a good result and a good lift up the table.
How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad?
Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m.
If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL.
With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!!
1 - 0 is a good result and a good lift up the table. How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad? Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m. If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL. With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!! TEBOURBA

3:02pm Sun 9 Dec 12

LJSaint says...

Great result today and great team performance. Don't like the Boo'ers for Guly. I am the first person to criticise him normally but in a short time on the pitch he was a man intent on proving himself and played really well. You don't boo your own team EVER! Punch and Shaw were brilliant, felt great having Davis in goal- reliable, steady hands, organiser. Great team performance. Now all you Adkins haters from 6 weeks or so ago EAT YOUR WORDS!!!!!
Great result today and great team performance. Don't like the Boo'ers for Guly. I am the first person to criticise him normally but in a short time on the pitch he was a man intent on proving himself and played really well. You don't boo your own team EVER! Punch and Shaw were brilliant, felt great having Davis in goal- reliable, steady hands, organiser. Great team performance. Now all you Adkins haters from 6 weeks or so ago EAT YOUR WORDS!!!!! LJSaint

3:09pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al,

I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.

I now understand the whole thing a lot more.

One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.

If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.

Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.

This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.

To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.

Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.

Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,

So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.

When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.

I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.

Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy


Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.

I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.

What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.


What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.

There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?

I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.


Gooday to you

Big must win game v Sunderland
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland More Glory

3:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12

bluewhiteandred says...

To the other bluewhiteandred on pompey news site im here ! ****
apparently i have been told by ? now that would be telling your a tasty sexy lady Saints supporter who has a university litracy degree
you said you would leave me alone if i didnt come on here xxx

I wish you would tell me you true log in name i want to send you a xxxxmas card
To the other bluewhiteandred on pompey news site im here ! **** apparently i have been told by ? now that would be telling your a tasty sexy lady Saints supporter who has a university litracy degree you said you would leave me alone if i didnt come on here xxx I wish you would tell me you true log in name i want to send you a xxxxmas card bluewhiteandred

3:28pm Sun 9 Dec 12

mack chinnon says...

E I E I E I O,
up the premier league we go
and when we get to 15th
this is what we sing
we,re Southampton
we,re Southampton
Nigel is our king
E I E I E I O, up the premier league we go and when we get to 15th this is what we sing we,re Southampton we,re Southampton Nigel is our king mack chinnon

3:35pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al,

I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.

I now understand the whole thing a lot more.

One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.

If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.

Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.

This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.

To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.

Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.

Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,

So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.

When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.

I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.

Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy


Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.

I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.

What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.


What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.

There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?

I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.


Gooday to you

Big must win game v Sunderland
sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man . slugger

3:52pm Sun 9 Dec 12

circa 66 saint says...

more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well,
any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter.
THERE HATCHET BURIED
COYR
more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR circa 66 saint

4:06pm Sun 9 Dec 12

franiow says...

Not on here much for obvious reasons as you have to scroll through so much to find the real thread. Enjoyed the match yesterday, though wish we would put the chances away. Looked back to ourselves (possibly because of opposition, but mainly because confidence is back. Luke Shaw looks brilliant and so young (Buttner anyone). Pucheon is like a new player, but everyone played well. Good to see SKD back...wouldn't want his career here to finish on a low point. Nigel values Guly for his height and as a utility man...always does his best.. all managers like players they can trust. Onwards and upwards.
Not on here much for obvious reasons as you have to scroll through so much to find the real thread. Enjoyed the match yesterday, though wish we would put the chances away. Looked back to ourselves (possibly because of opposition, but mainly because confidence is back. Luke Shaw looks brilliant and so young (Buttner anyone). Pucheon is like a new player, but everyone played well. Good to see SKD back...wouldn't want his career here to finish on a low point. Nigel values Guly for his height and as a utility man...always does his best.. all managers like players they can trust. Onwards and upwards. franiow

4:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .
Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.

So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?

Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .[/p][/quote]Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in. So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red? Make valid points by all means, I will do the same. More Glory

4:16pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

circa 66 saint wrote:
more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR
Cool.

I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
[quote][p][bold]circa 66 saint[/bold] wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR[/p][/quote]Cool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding). More Glory

4:20pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Fatty x Ford Worker says...

Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.
Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in. Fatty x Ford Worker

4:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates?

...just like the famous game from WW1

...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.

...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates? ...just like the famous game from WW1 ...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen. ...bagsy I go in goal! :O) Baddesley Bill

4:35pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .
Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.

So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?

Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .[/p][/quote]Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in. So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red? Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.[/p][/quote]i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word . slugger

4:53pm Sun 9 Dec 12

saint, says...

More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al,

I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.

I now understand the whole thing a lot more.

One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.

If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.

Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.

This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.

To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.

Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.

Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,

So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.

When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.

I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.

Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy


Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.

I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.

What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.


What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.

There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?

I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.


Gooday to you

Big must win game v Sunderland
I have been reading these posts and very rarely commenting for about 5 or 6 years and it is a joke on here now. I left the UK for France with my family nearly 5 years ago and I have really enjoyed reading the stories on the saints and all the comments from everyone (I am a happy clapper by the way, as are my two boys!!). I can't let them read the rubbish that has been written on here the last few months though and that is a shame as they sit around the laptop with me on match days and never miss a minute whether it was listening on the player or the luxury of watching every game this season. They are saints mad as I have been taking them to St Mary's since they were 2 and 3!!
So if any of you must go on the news site remember light hearted footy banter only, please remember our dark days and how it felt when it looked like it was all over. COYR
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]I have been reading these posts and very rarely commenting for about 5 or 6 years and it is a joke on here now. I left the UK for France with my family nearly 5 years ago and I have really enjoyed reading the stories on the saints and all the comments from everyone (I am a happy clapper by the way, as are my two boys!!). I can't let them read the rubbish that has been written on here the last few months though and that is a shame as they sit around the laptop with me on match days and never miss a minute whether it was listening on the player or the luxury of watching every game this season. They are saints mad as I have been taking them to St Mary's since they were 2 and 3!! So if any of you must go on the news site remember light hearted footy banter only, please remember our dark days and how it felt when it looked like it was all over. COYR saint,

4:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Force14 says...

slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .
Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.

So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?

Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .
You bore everyone what ever site you are on.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .[/p][/quote]Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in. So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red? Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.[/p][/quote]i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .[/p][/quote]You bore everyone what ever site you are on. Force14

4:59pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

Force14 wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .
Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.

So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?

Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .
You bore everyone what ever site you are on.
that helps doesn't it ! ....... i suggest that this one is just a pure and simple wum who wouldn't know a football if it smacked him (or her) in the face .
[quote][p][bold]Force14[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .[/p][/quote]Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in. So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red? Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.[/p][/quote]i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .[/p][/quote]You bore everyone what ever site you are on.[/p][/quote]that helps doesn't it ! ....... i suggest that this one is just a pure and simple wum who wouldn't know a football if it smacked him (or her) in the face . slugger

5:00pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

franiow wrote:
Not on here much for obvious reasons as you have to scroll through so much to find the real thread. Enjoyed the match yesterday, though wish we would put the chances away. Looked back to ourselves (possibly because of opposition, but mainly because confidence is back. Luke Shaw looks brilliant and so young (Buttner anyone). Pucheon is like a new player, but everyone played well. Good to see SKD back...wouldn't want his career here to finish on a low point. Nigel values Guly for his height and as a utility man...always does his best.. all managers like players they can trust. Onwards and upwards.
Fran, my exact sentiments, I well remember on here when fans were hollering for a left back before the Buttner deal was broken up that we already had a very good left back, I believe with the Jack Cork return plus Luke Shaw the Saints defence has looked pretty solid, we won't win every game but the teams we lose to will know they had to work hard to win.
[quote][p][bold]franiow[/bold] wrote: Not on here much for obvious reasons as you have to scroll through so much to find the real thread. Enjoyed the match yesterday, though wish we would put the chances away. Looked back to ourselves (possibly because of opposition, but mainly because confidence is back. Luke Shaw looks brilliant and so young (Buttner anyone). Pucheon is like a new player, but everyone played well. Good to see SKD back...wouldn't want his career here to finish on a low point. Nigel values Guly for his height and as a utility man...always does his best.. all managers like players they can trust. Onwards and upwards.[/p][/quote]Fran, my exact sentiments, I well remember on here when fans were hollering for a left back before the Buttner deal was broken up that we already had a very good left back, I believe with the Jack Cork return plus Luke Shaw the Saints defence has looked pretty solid, we won't win every game but the teams we lose to will know they had to work hard to win. Invidia

5:01pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Force14 says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates?

...just like the famous game from WW1

...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.

...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates? ...just like the famous game from WW1 ...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen. ...bagsy I go in goal! :O)[/p][/quote]11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh. Force14

5:02pm Sun 9 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

TEBOURBA wrote:
1 - 0 is a good result and a good lift up the table.
How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad?
Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m.
If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL.
With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!!
Go forth and multiply.
[quote][p][bold]TEBOURBA[/bold] wrote: 1 - 0 is a good result and a good lift up the table. How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad? Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m. If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL. With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!![/p][/quote]Go forth and multiply. OSPREYSAINT

5:02pm Sun 9 Dec 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Force14 wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates?

...just like the famous game from WW1

...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.

...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.
Try sex and travel.
[quote][p][bold]Force14[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates? ...just like the famous game from WW1 ...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen. ...bagsy I go in goal! :O)[/p][/quote]11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.[/p][/quote]Try sex and travel. OSPREYSAINT

5:03pm Sun 9 Dec 12

JohnItaly says...

With transfer window only a couple of weeks away speculation will soon be aired as to coming and goings. As a starter what about Lee & Mayuka departing. Lee seems to have disappeared all together with Mayuka doing nothing but warming the bench. Also cannot see Boruc hanging around making room for a thoroughly experinced keeper to come in.
With transfer window only a couple of weeks away speculation will soon be aired as to coming and goings. As a starter what about Lee & Mayuka departing. Lee seems to have disappeared all together with Mayuka doing nothing but warming the bench. Also cannot see Boruc hanging around making room for a thoroughly experinced keeper to come in. JohnItaly

5:03pm Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.
Anti-freeze Martini?
[quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.[/p][/quote]Anti-freeze Martini? puppy saint

5:07pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway. Invidia

5:08pm Sun 9 Dec 12

circa 66 saint says...

More Glory wrote:
circa 66 saint wrote:
more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR
Cool.

I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet

now good posting
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]circa 66 saint[/bold] wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR[/p][/quote]Cool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).[/p][/quote]proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good posting circa 66 saint

5:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Force14 says...

Invidia wrote:
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
why are you reading it then thicko ?
[quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.[/p][/quote]why are you reading it then thicko ? Force14

5:13pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play.

I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27?

However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this.

Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie

http://www.newsmedia
news.com/milligan.sh
tml

The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu. More Glory

5:13pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

Invidia wrote:
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
[quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.[/p][/quote]i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter . slugger

5:19pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Force14 wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote: Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates? ...just like the famous game from WW1 ...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen. ...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.
That is a fair point Force, Maybe you have to be a Pompey fan to understand how funny that is. At least we would have a good chance of winning.
[quote][p][bold]Force14[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates? ...just like the famous game from WW1 ...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen. ...bagsy I go in goal! :O)[/p][/quote]11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.[/p][/quote]That is a fair point Force, Maybe you have to be a Pompey fan to understand how funny that is. At least we would have a good chance of winning. More Glory

5:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

More Glory wrote:
OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play.

I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27?

However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this.

Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie

http://www.newsmedia

news.com/milligan.sh

tml

The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned . slugger

5:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

slugger wrote:
Invidia wrote:
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.[/p][/quote]i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .[/p][/quote]"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed" Invidia

5:23pm Sun 9 Dec 12

ShakeyWiffles says...

Bring back Branfoot wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.



Skunt :0)
Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Actually Mr Pedantic. I know Bill, Slugger AND Seed. I can confirm they are different people but hey. You won't believe me, you'll just wrongly assume I'm another of their identities. They also do not come off second best to you. A lot of your opinions are bizarre and when trying to argue and act the keyboard warrior you come off as nothing more than a petulant little child. Bit of advice for you? Know when to sit down and shut up. You're fighting a losing battle and making yourself look like all the things you call them.
[quote][p][bold]Bring back Branfoot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Oops...somebody's lost the plot online. Skunt :0)[/p][/quote]Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol[/p][/quote]Actually Mr Pedantic. I know Bill, Slugger AND Seed. I can confirm they are different people but hey. You won't believe me, you'll just wrongly assume I'm another of their identities. They also do not come off second best to you. A lot of your opinions are bizarre and when trying to argue and act the keyboard warrior you come off as nothing more than a petulant little child. Bit of advice for you? Know when to sit down and shut up. You're fighting a losing battle and making yourself look like all the things you call them. ShakeyWiffles

5:24pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Perhaps the frustration comes from people accusing you of something you're not guilty of.

I've have one login here and one on The News, both are similar and identify me. I am not The Realist nor several other names I've been accused of and not even seen their posts! I always supported PST on The News and think they should get right behind it, frankly their aren't any other choices in town.

Also I have no problem with different opinions, but I do have a problem with style. If someone says:

I think Nigel is struggling and maybe out of his depth.

That's a valid opinion, whereas:

Tango head hasn't got a clue and has installed sunbeds at SMS

Clearly isn't!
Perhaps the frustration comes from people accusing you of something you're not guilty of. I've have one login here and one on The News, both are similar and identify me. I am not The Realist nor several other names I've been accused of and not even seen their posts! I always supported PST on The News and think they should get right behind it, frankly their aren't any other choices in town. Also I have no problem with different opinions, but I do have a problem with style. If someone says: I think Nigel is struggling and maybe out of his depth. That's a valid opinion, whereas: Tango head hasn't got a clue and has installed sunbeds at SMS Clearly isn't! Seedhouse the Unrepentant

5:30pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

Invidia wrote:
slugger wrote:
Invidia wrote:
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"
oh i understand alright , perhaps you could acknowledge that moves are afoot to address the poinltess tit for tat "banter" ....... that's a positive step no ?
[quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.[/p][/quote]i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .[/p][/quote]"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"[/p][/quote]oh i understand alright , perhaps you could acknowledge that moves are afoot to address the poinltess tit for tat "banter" ....... that's a positive step no ? slugger

5:31pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

saint, wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
I have been reading these posts and very rarely commenting for about 5 or 6 years and it is a joke on here now. I left the UK for France with my family nearly 5 years ago and I have really enjoyed reading the stories on the saints and all the comments from everyone (I am a happy clapper by the way, as are my two boys!!). I can't let them read the rubbish that has been written on here the last few months though and that is a shame as they sit around the laptop with me on match days and never miss a minute whether it was listening on the player or the luxury of watching every game this season. They are saints mad as I have been taking them to St Mary's since they were 2 and 3!! So if any of you must go on the news site remember light hearted footy banter only, please remember our dark days and how it felt when it looked like it was all over. COYR
Saint. What happened on our site, is that it went open season, and then the Mods just really clamped down. I was surprised when I first came here, at what could be said on here, then it just washes over you, The thread yesterday was not family entertainment for sure.
[quote][p][bold]saint,[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]I have been reading these posts and very rarely commenting for about 5 or 6 years and it is a joke on here now. I left the UK for France with my family nearly 5 years ago and I have really enjoyed reading the stories on the saints and all the comments from everyone (I am a happy clapper by the way, as are my two boys!!). I can't let them read the rubbish that has been written on here the last few months though and that is a shame as they sit around the laptop with me on match days and never miss a minute whether it was listening on the player or the luxury of watching every game this season. They are saints mad as I have been taking them to St Mary's since they were 2 and 3!! So if any of you must go on the news site remember light hearted footy banter only, please remember our dark days and how it felt when it looked like it was all over. COYR[/p][/quote]Saint. What happened on our site, is that it went open season, and then the Mods just really clamped down. I was surprised when I first came here, at what could be said on here, then it just washes over you, The thread yesterday was not family entertainment for sure. More Glory

5:33pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

slugger wrote:
Invidia wrote:
slugger wrote:
Invidia wrote:
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"
oh i understand alright , perhaps you could acknowledge that moves are afoot to address the poinltess tit for tat "banter" ....... that's a positive step no ?
just re-read ...... apologies invidia , thought it was aimed at me ....... doh !
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.[/p][/quote]i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .[/p][/quote]"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"[/p][/quote]oh i understand alright , perhaps you could acknowledge that moves are afoot to address the poinltess tit for tat "banter" ....... that's a positive step no ?[/p][/quote]just re-read ...... apologies invidia , thought it was aimed at me ....... doh ! slugger

5:34pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

circa 66 saint wrote:
More Glory wrote:
circa 66 saint wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR
Cool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good posting
If I was a mind reader, do you think Mystic Mg would be a good name?
[quote][p][bold]circa 66 saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]circa 66 saint[/bold] wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR[/p][/quote]Cool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).[/p][/quote]proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good posting[/p][/quote]If I was a mind reader, do you think Mystic Mg would be a good name? More Glory

5:40pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ? slugger

5:42pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Fatty x Ford Worker says...

puppy saint wrote:
Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.
Anti-freeze Martini?
Oh course dont upset Percy He likes it shaken but not stirred!
[quote][p][bold]puppy saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.[/p][/quote]Anti-freeze Martini?[/p][/quote]Oh course dont upset Percy He likes it shaken but not stirred! Fatty x Ford Worker

5:46pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.

A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician

It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.

He sounds OK to me
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me More Glory

5:48pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Fatty x Ford Worker says...

Has that old Bag got new wheels yet on our Fish Finger Site.Sorry Crab Sticks HA.HA!
Has that old Bag got new wheels yet on our Fish Finger Site.Sorry Crab Sticks HA.HA! Fatty x Ford Worker

5:51pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.

A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician

It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.

He sounds OK to me
it does sound odd , it would appear that unearthing the truth can be a risky business .
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]it does sound odd , it would appear that unearthing the truth can be a risky business . slugger

5:53pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.

A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician

It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.

He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset.

The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

5:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

slugger wrote:
mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No. More Glory

5:56pm Sun 9 Dec 12

st1halo says...

More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
Bill et al,

I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.

I now understand the whole thing a lot more.

One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.

If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.

Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.

This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.

To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.

Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.

Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,

So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.

When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.

I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.

Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy


Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.

I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.

What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.


What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.

There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?

I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.


Gooday to you

Big must win game v Sunderland
I don't know what goes on at the NS site, Gloria, I have had a look but as they say, two wrongs don't make a right.
I don't mind the p1ss taking and banter like "you're trophy cabinet doubles up as a broom cupboard" from your guys, stuff like that, it's entertaining and comparing history,you can be as taunting and baiting as you like but inane name calling is pointless and degenerates quickly into childish posts which consume the thread and aren't even funny.
I suggest you try and keep it impersonal. I do.
Even some Saints fans call other Saints fans skates when they disagree which is not called for really, gotta respect others opinions even if you disagree.



STID
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR[/p][/quote]Bill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland[/p][/quote]I don't know what goes on at the NS site, Gloria, I have had a look but as they say, two wrongs don't make a right. I don't mind the p1ss taking and banter like "you're trophy cabinet doubles up as a broom cupboard" from your guys, stuff like that, it's entertaining and comparing history,you can be as taunting and baiting as you like but inane name calling is pointless and degenerates quickly into childish posts which consume the thread and aren't even funny. I suggest you try and keep it impersonal. I do. Even some Saints fans call other Saints fans skates when they disagree which is not called for really, gotta respect others opinions even if you disagree. STID st1halo

5:58pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

Stephen Milligan played for Carlisle some years back but never made it big
Stephen Milligan played for Carlisle some years back but never made it big Invidia

6:09pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest".

Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest". Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through. More Glory

6:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool . slugger

6:14pm Sun 9 Dec 12

puppy saint says...

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Has that old Bag got new wheels yet on our Fish Finger Site.Sorry Crab Sticks HA.HA!
Windolene Mojito?
[quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Has that old Bag got new wheels yet on our Fish Finger Site.Sorry Crab Sticks HA.HA![/p][/quote]Windolene Mojito? puppy saint

6:18pm Sun 9 Dec 12

circa 66 saint says...

More Glory wrote:
circa 66 saint wrote:
More Glory wrote:
circa 66 saint wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR
Cool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good posting
If I was a mind reader, do you think Mystic Mg would be a good name?
i see west hoof and fat sam are coming into a fixture line up simular to our start of the season, by the new year will they be below us and down in the mix, their easy start will prove to be as misleading as saints start, just proves no matter what position you are during the season it's where you are at the end that counts C O Y R
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]circa 66 saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]circa 66 saint[/bold] wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR[/p][/quote]Cool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).[/p][/quote]proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good posting[/p][/quote]If I was a mind reader, do you think Mystic Mg would be a good name?[/p][/quote]i see west hoof and fat sam are coming into a fixture line up simular to our start of the season, by the new year will they be below us and down in the mix, their easy start will prove to be as misleading as saints start, just proves no matter what position you are during the season it's where you are at the end that counts C O Y R circa 66 saint

6:18pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

I thought the connection with football was that his uncle spike from Sholing used to go to the "Old Dell" as a Saints fan
I thought the connection with football was that his uncle spike from Sholing used to go to the "Old Dell" as a Saints fan Invidia

6:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Strasbourg Saint says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.

A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician

It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.

He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset.

The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all.

Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes.

I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke.

Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties .....

When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious.

MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice.

Peace and love!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love! Strasbourg Saint

6:31pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option. More Glory

6:31pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

More Glory wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest".

Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.
Caps? It comes in a bottle. There was also the strange circumstances of Godfrey Olsens son being found dead. In a bath in a Paris hotel I think, but my memory isn't great. Nitrate does that...
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest". Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.[/p][/quote]Caps? It comes in a bottle. There was also the strange circumstances of Godfrey Olsens son being found dead. In a bath in a Paris hotel I think, but my memory isn't great. Nitrate does that... Seedhouse the Unrepentant

6:38pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Strasbourg Saint says...

Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.

A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician

It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.

He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset.

The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all.

Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes.

I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke.

Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties .....

When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious.

MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice.

Peace and love!
Sorry, I'm getting my tory babes muddled up, I don't mean Spelman, of course, but the former Telegraph journo, Julie Kirkbride. Frankly, one tory babe looks and sounds just like the next one to me :o)
[quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Sorry, I'm getting my tory babes muddled up, I don't mean Spelman, of course, but the former Telegraph journo, Julie Kirkbride. Frankly, one tory babe looks and sounds just like the next one to me :o) Strasbourg Saint

6:45pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site.

I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here.

I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

6:47pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie,

Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.

It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.

The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
[quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman. More Glory

6:52pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is" Invidia

6:52pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site.

I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here.

I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
can't argue with that eh mr glory ?
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]can't argue with that eh mr glory ? slugger

6:55pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site.

I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here.

I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0) Baddesley Bill

6:58pm Sun 9 Dec 12

st1halo says...

More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie,

Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.

It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.

The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though.
To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana!
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though. To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana! st1halo

7:01pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest". Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.
Caps? It comes in a bottle. There was also the strange circumstances of Godfrey Olsens son being found dead. In a bath in a Paris hotel I think, but my memory isn't great. Nitrate does that...
http://www.drugs.com
/cons/amyl-nitrite-i
nhalation-oral-nebul
ization.html
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest". Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.[/p][/quote]Caps? It comes in a bottle. There was also the strange circumstances of Godfrey Olsens son being found dead. In a bath in a Paris hotel I think, but my memory isn't great. Nitrate does that...[/p][/quote]http://www.drugs.com /cons/amyl-nitrite-i nhalation-oral-nebul ization.html More Glory

7:05pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie,

Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.

It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.

The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him?

I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him? I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

7:08pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie,

Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.

It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.

The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him?

I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
woahhh ! ......... i said nothing m'lud .
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him? I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.[/p][/quote]woahhh ! ......... i said nothing m'lud . slugger

7:11pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Invidia wrote:
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
Really? It is a footy story with a connection to your town, As per usual a bloke who is asking questions and trying to get to the bottom of things is sidelined, and make to look a wierdo / in this case perverted. If this was one of your relatives or friends you would be concerned surely. OK you are not interested, but others will be, and as I say I was just after information on what he was like as a bloke, as I was given some info years ago which is now making sense.

As I said above, this site is more rangier than the News. Why not?
[quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"[/p][/quote]Really? It is a footy story with a connection to your town, As per usual a bloke who is asking questions and trying to get to the bottom of things is sidelined, and make to look a wierdo / in this case perverted. If this was one of your relatives or friends you would be concerned surely. OK you are not interested, but others will be, and as I say I was just after information on what he was like as a bloke, as I was given some info years ago which is now making sense. As I said above, this site is more rangier than the News. Why not? More Glory

7:12pm Sun 9 Dec 12

angus mc coatup says...

Invidia wrote:
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
it's just a game, to pull the thread away from the point of discussion.unfortuna
tley after consuming a rather large amount of alcohol last night I fell for It,with that obnoxious egotistical BBB.I apologise for posting a load of stupid stuff and will now revert back to sssshhhhhing !

well we don't keep many clean sheets
so the beer was flowing copiously.

(not much of an excuse I know)
[quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"[/p][/quote]it's just a game, to pull the thread away from the point of discussion.unfortuna tley after consuming a rather large amount of alcohol last night I fell for It,with that obnoxious egotistical BBB.I apologise for posting a load of stupid stuff and will now revert back to sssshhhhhing ! well we don't keep many clean sheets so the beer was flowing copiously. (not much of an excuse I know) angus mc coatup

7:14pm Sun 9 Dec 12

hedge end bob says...

More glory , i think it might have been something you posted about our manager, i e name calling, that got a reaction from me. I cant remember attacking you first. Honest question, did you ever post under different names when having a dig at me??. The style of insults were much the same from three different posters.
As you say today i am just not interested what happens to your club or what your club supporters post on this site. I now put it down to ignorence and bad manners and simply ignore.
If you want to talk football without insults that's fine, i do with other clubs fans with no trouble.
More glory , i think it might have been something you posted about our manager, i e name calling, that got a reaction from me. I cant remember attacking you first. Honest question, did you ever post under different names when having a dig at me??. The style of insults were much the same from three different posters. As you say today i am just not interested what happens to your club or what your club supporters post on this site. I now put it down to ignorence and bad manners and simply ignore. If you want to talk football without insults that's fine, i do with other clubs fans with no trouble. hedge end bob

7:15pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie,

Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.

It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.

The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him?

I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
woahhh ! ......... i said nothing m'lud .
Similar circumstances to George Michael.

The trouble is the public want squeaky clean politicians who are normal family people. However, normal family people wouldn't stand to be an MP. Therefore they have to lie.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him? I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.[/p][/quote]woahhh ! ......... i said nothing m'lud .[/p][/quote]Similar circumstances to George Michael. The trouble is the public want squeaky clean politicians who are normal family people. However, normal family people wouldn't stand to be an MP. Therefore they have to lie. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

7:15pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)[/p][/quote]Velleity? More Glory

7:20pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

st1halo wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though. To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana!
Club Tropicana, drinks are free,
Fun and sunshine - there's enough for everyone.
All that's missing is the sea,
But don't worry, you can suntan!

So George was there.
[quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though. To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana![/p][/quote]Club Tropicana, drinks are free, Fun and sunshine - there's enough for everyone. All that's missing is the sea, But don't worry, you can suntan! So George was there. More Glory

7:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ?
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)[/p][/quote]Velleity?[/p][/quote]mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ? slugger

7:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ?
We did. And I coached V Jnr to beat his old man at pool! A nice dad and son. I was invited late into a box this weekend otherwise I would have taken Seed the Small and met up again.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)[/p][/quote]Velleity?[/p][/quote]mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ?[/p][/quote]We did. And I coached V Jnr to beat his old man at pool! A nice dad and son. I was invited late into a box this weekend otherwise I would have taken Seed the Small and met up again. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

7:27pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)[/p][/quote]Velleity?[/p][/quote]I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O) Baddesley Bill

7:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)
...he is however...nowhere near as good looking! :O)
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)[/p][/quote]Velleity?[/p][/quote]I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)[/p][/quote]...he is however...nowhere near as good looking! :O) Baddesley Bill

7:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him? I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
I'm saying that SM wasn't part of the establishment. MP is, and was going to be exposed with another for his deviancy.

SM may have been asked to intervene, but there was also a bigger picture going on with his book, and other stuff. The required intervention may have been the establishment asking him to back off, and toe the line, He obviously didn't, which is why I was after some background info on him.

Politicians are controlled via their deviancy. It's how it has always been.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him? I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.[/p][/quote]I'm saying that SM wasn't part of the establishment. MP is, and was going to be exposed with another for his deviancy. SM may have been asked to intervene, but there was also a bigger picture going on with his book, and other stuff. The required intervention may have been the establishment asking him to back off, and toe the line, He obviously didn't, which is why I was after some background info on him. Politicians are controlled via their deviancy. It's how it has always been. More Glory

7:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Velleity says...

More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
I'm on there as "Karuna", for reasons I forget. I go there to read what's happening to your club.

I made two posts wishing you all the best in sorting out your problems; I feel for you and, as I've said plenty of times, I simply don't buy into football hatred ever, under any circumstances. I never call you "Skates" or anything like it.

The idea that we have ANY say over the idiots who post their hate-filled drivel on the News site is ridiculous. We don't even know who the majority of them are. To use that as an excuse for the mindless and unfunny tripe posted on here by the WUMs is a bit foolish, in my opinion.

I still think the best solution is "ssshhhhh" but it seems to have died something of a death, despite the fact that it generated a week or so of threads that were readable and (generally) about football.
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]I'm on there as "Karuna", for reasons I forget. I go there to read what's happening to your club. I made two posts wishing you all the best in sorting out your problems; I feel for you and, as I've said plenty of times, I simply don't buy into football hatred ever, under any circumstances. I never call you "Skates" or anything like it. The idea that we have ANY say over the idiots who post their hate-filled drivel on the News site is ridiculous. We don't even know who the majority of them are. To use that as an excuse for the mindless and unfunny tripe posted on here by the WUMs is a bit foolish, in my opinion. I still think the best solution is "ssshhhhh" but it seems to have died something of a death, despite the fact that it generated a week or so of threads that were readable and (generally) about football. Velleity

7:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12

st1halo says...

More Glory wrote:
st1halo wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Strasbourg Saint wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me
When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!
Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though. To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana!
Club Tropicana, drinks are free,
Fun and sunshine - there's enough for everyone.
All that's missing is the sea,
But don't worry, you can suntan!

So George was there.
Of course George was there, he's never likely to miss out on the old asphyxo - sesh!
Just follow the clues and .... you end up disappearing up your own @rse!

Conspiracy theories... don't you just luv 'em!!!
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Strasbourg Saint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.[/p][/quote]to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .[/p][/quote]Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to me[/p][/quote]When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.[/p][/quote]Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love![/p][/quote]Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.[/p][/quote]I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though. To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana![/p][/quote]Club Tropicana, drinks are free, Fun and sunshine - there's enough for everyone. All that's missing is the sea, But don't worry, you can suntan! So George was there.[/p][/quote]Of course George was there, he's never likely to miss out on the old asphyxo - sesh! Just follow the clues and .... you end up disappearing up your own @rse! Conspiracy theories... don't you just luv 'em!!! st1halo

7:32pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Velleity says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)
...he is however...nowhere near as good looking! :O)
Steady on, that's fighting talk, bucko.

I'll be bringing Velleity Jr to the JT after Sunderland, so he'll be having words with you about this. You don't want to make him angry.
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.[/p][/quote]To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)[/p][/quote]Velleity?[/p][/quote]I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)[/p][/quote]...he is however...nowhere near as good looking! :O)[/p][/quote]Steady on, that's fighting talk, bucko. I'll be bringing Velleity Jr to the JT after Sunderland, so he'll be having words with you about this. You don't want to make him angry. Velleity

7:33pm Sun 9 Dec 12

slugger says...

i make no apologies to anyone ref chatting to people on here ......... if i had a pound for every time iv'e been told to "get a room" i'd be a wealthy man ...... truth is that iv'e met at least 25 people as a direct result of posting on here , i'm even still in touch with captain haddock (brighton fan) who i also met as a result of posting on this site ......... those who say that my comments are meaningless are as far from the truth as it is possible to be ........... you get out what you put in and i've got a lot out !
i make no apologies to anyone ref chatting to people on here ......... if i had a pound for every time iv'e been told to "get a room" i'd be a wealthy man ...... truth is that iv'e met at least 25 people as a direct result of posting on here , i'm even still in touch with captain haddock (brighton fan) who i also met as a result of posting on this site ......... those who say that my comments are meaningless are as far from the truth as it is possible to be ........... you get out what you put in and i've got a lot out ! slugger

7:34pm Sun 9 Dec 12

More Glory says...

hedge end bob wrote:
More glory , i think it might have been something you posted about our manager, i e name calling, that got a reaction from me. I cant remember attacking you first. Honest question, did you ever post under different names when having a dig at me??. The style of insults were much the same from three different posters. As you say today i am just not interested what happens to your club or what your club supporters post on this site. I now put it down to ignorence and bad manners and simply ignore. If you want to talk football without insults that's fine, i do with other clubs fans with no trouble.
Not possible Bob, Others obviously just joined in.

I think a few months back you were attcking all visiting posters, hence the tit for tat.

As a matter of interest, how many Pompey posters on here are treated without too much grief?
[quote][p][bold]hedge end bob[/bold] wrote: More glory , i think it might have been something you posted about our manager, i e name calling, that got a reaction from me. I cant remember attacking you first. Honest question, did you ever post under different names when having a dig at me??. The style of insults were much the same from three different posters. As you say today i am just not interested what happens to your club or what your club supporters post on this site. I now put it down to ignorence and bad manners and simply ignore. If you want to talk football without insults that's fine, i do with other clubs fans with no trouble.[/p][/quote]Not possible Bob, Others obviously just joined in. I think a few months back you were attcking all visiting posters, hence the tit for tat. As a matter of interest, how many Pompey posters on here are treated without too much grief? More Glory

7:35pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Velleity wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
I'm on there as "Karuna", for reasons I forget. I go there to read what's happening to your club.

I made two posts wishing you all the best in sorting out your problems; I feel for you and, as I've said plenty of times, I simply don't buy into football hatred ever, under any circumstances. I never call you "Skates" or anything like it.

The idea that we have ANY say over the idiots who post their hate-filled drivel on the News site is ridiculous. We don't even know who the majority of them are. To use that as an excuse for the mindless and unfunny tripe posted on here by the WUMs is a bit foolish, in my opinion.

I still think the best solution is "ssshhhhh" but it seems to have died something of a death, despite the fact that it generated a week or so of threads that were readable and (generally) about football.
You're right about the hatred thing. I took a Scottish friend of mine, she's lived here for a long time and is a Saints fan, with me on Saturday. She's not into the hatred. It's only some of those that were born here that do it.

She's the PA to a tory MP, I'll get her to ask him about SM :)
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]I'm on there as "Karuna", for reasons I forget. I go there to read what's happening to your club. I made two posts wishing you all the best in sorting out your problems; I feel for you and, as I've said plenty of times, I simply don't buy into football hatred ever, under any circumstances. I never call you "Skates" or anything like it. The idea that we have ANY say over the idiots who post their hate-filled drivel on the News site is ridiculous. We don't even know who the majority of them are. To use that as an excuse for the mindless and unfunny tripe posted on here by the WUMs is a bit foolish, in my opinion. I still think the best solution is "ssshhhhh" but it seems to have died something of a death, despite the fact that it generated a week or so of threads that were readable and (generally) about football.[/p][/quote]You're right about the hatred thing. I took a Scottish friend of mine, she's lived here for a long time and is a Saints fan, with me on Saturday. She's not into the hatred. It's only some of those that were born here that do it. She's the PA to a tory MP, I'll get her to ask him about SM :) Seedhouse the Unrepentant

7:38pm Sun 9 Dec 12

costa gaz says...

Milligan, Savile, tory MP's ............
WTF has this got to do with SOUTHAMPTON FOOTBALL CLUB?



PLEASE WOULD ALL OF YOU TO$$ERS ....DO ONE.
Leave this site to people who would like to talk about their club.
Good grief...
Milligan, Savile, tory MP's ............ WTF has this got to do with SOUTHAMPTON FOOTBALL CLUB? PLEASE WOULD ALL OF YOU TO$$ERS ....DO ONE. Leave this site to people who would like to talk about their club. Good grief... costa gaz

7:38pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Invidia says...

More Glory wrote:
Invidia wrote:
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
Really? It is a footy story with a connection to your town, As per usual a bloke who is asking questions and trying to get to the bottom of things is sidelined, and make to look a wierdo / in this case perverted. If this was one of your relatives or friends you would be concerned surely. OK you are not interested, but others will be, and as I say I was just after information on what he was like as a bloke, as I was given some info years ago which is now making sense.

As I said above, this site is more rangier than the News. Why not?
What connection to Saints fc has some weirdo who topped himself, you say he has a connection with Fash, so what I have a connection with some ex Saints players and have secrets but nothing to link with some weirdo conspiracy theory, and even more relevant a WUM who cant get a reaction from his fellow Portsmouth fan so comes on here for his kicks, you ought to try the set-up that went wrong for your hero Stephen Milligan and stop coming on here with irrelevant wind-ups
[quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Invidia[/bold] wrote: More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"[/p][/quote]Really? It is a footy story with a connection to your town, As per usual a bloke who is asking questions and trying to get to the bottom of things is sidelined, and make to look a wierdo / in this case perverted. If this was one of your relatives or friends you would be concerned surely. OK you are not interested, but others will be, and as I say I was just after information on what he was like as a bloke, as I was given some info years ago which is now making sense. As I said above, this site is more rangier than the News. Why not?[/p][/quote]What connection to Saints fc has some weirdo who topped himself, you say he has a connection with Fash, so what I have a connection with some ex Saints players and have secrets but nothing to link with some weirdo conspiracy theory, and even more relevant a WUM who cant get a reaction from his fellow Portsmouth fan so comes on here for his kicks, you ought to try the set-up that went wrong for your hero Stephen Milligan and stop coming on here with irrelevant wind-ups Invidia

7:39pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Velleity says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote:
More Glory wrote:
slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
No.
who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
Velleity?
mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ?
We did. And I coached V Jnr to beat his old man at pool! A nice dad and son. I was invited late into a box this weekend otherwise I would have taken Seed the Small and met up again.
That's libel.

I won.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]More Glory[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?[/p][/quote]No.[/p][/quote]who then ? ...... transparency is cool .[/p][/quote]As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.[/p][/quote]The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login