Adkins hails revitalised Puncheon (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Adkins hails revitalised Puncheon
5:41pm Saturday 8th December 2012 in Saints News
Adkins hails revitalised Puncheon
Saints manager Nigel Adkins praised match winner Jason Puncheon for his maturity after his strike earned the club a valuable victory against Reading.
The midfielder’s fourth goal of the season separated the sides at St Mary’s and capped another impressive performance from the 26-year-old.
Puncheon appeared to be on his way out of Saints a year ago, but resolved differences he had with the club and has now become an integral part of the first-team.
“He’s good, he’s matured, he’s had a good pre-season with us, he’s come back, it’s a fresh start if you like and he’s grasped it with both hands,” said Adkins.
“It just shows how if you work very hard, adapt to the culture you’re surrounded with, and grow and mature – and he’s done that.”
Saints fully deserved their win, and Adkins admitted the margin of victory should have been greater.
“I thought we dominated the game, I thought we were worthy winners,” he said. “The amount of chances we created, we should have put a few more in the back of the net.
“We played a good tempo of football, a variety of attacks and it was a good 1-0 victory for us.”
Related links
Comments(412)
dadofmy3sons
says...
6:00pm Sat 8 Dec 12
78% were right.
My disappointment at the time were the others who doubted and the Echo for starting the back stabbing of the manager of their local team.
Sometimes wonder if the Echo realise that there constant barrage of anti Saints propaganda is losing them readership daily.
The main bulk of posters on here are fully behind the team and the others tend to be WUMs who don't even support a football team, but just want to get bites. There have been accusations that the windups are actually Echo employees just trying to start a debate to show to advertisers that there is interest in this site.
Support the Saints.
My disappointment at the time were the others who doubted and the Echo for starting the back stabbing of the manager of their local team.
Sometimes wonder if the Echo realise that there constant barrage of anti Saints propaganda is losing them readership daily.
The main bulk of posters on here are fully behind the team and the others tend to be WUMs who don't even support a football team, but just want to get bites. There have been accusations that the windups are actually Echo employees just trying to start a debate to show to advertisers that there is interest in this site.
Support the Saints.
slugger
says...
6:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12
luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display !
truelysaints
says...
6:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12
You know what they say, Come the end of the year, the table will show the likely positions of teams by the end of the season.”
skiptonsaint
says...
6:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Also thought kelvin made a real difference today. Very calm lookin defence today
Are we going to look back on this end of season and say that was the point the season really started
Are we going to look back on this end of season and say that was the point the season really started
thomasupton
says...
6:08pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Puncheon was outstanding again today, my man of the match. On a sadder note, hope the person receiving cpr on the pavement on the way back is ok.
Velleity
says...
6:14pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Indeedy. Whenever the ball went near him you knew it was going to be safe.
luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display !
Also, he did a dribble past three defenders in the first half that was absolutely sublime. He laid it off perfectly to (I think) Lambert.
He certainly doesn't look young - he won't be intimidated and has a nice touch on him.
Baddesley Bill
says...
6:18pm Sat 8 Dec 12
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
dadofmy3sons
says...
6:20pm Sat 8 Dec 12
No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game.
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
Mush On The Beach
says...
6:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Where's the skunt chimp tea party now?
I'll tell you where, they are bricking it in their caravan because their worst nightmare is materialising in front of their eyes ... we are good enough to stay up and their extinction is inevitable :)
Jason Pucheon my MOTM
I'll tell you where, they are bricking it in their caravan because their worst nightmare is materialising in front of their eyes ... we are good enough to stay up and their extinction is inevitable :)
Jason Pucheon my MOTM
SPIKEISLANDTRADER
says...
6:22pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Needed the points and commitment , well done you REDS and faith again in N.A. 15th and rising up the league
dadofmy3sons
says...
6:25pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it.
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
6:25pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
SFCOLDBOY
says...
6:25pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Slugger,
luke shaw was my motm ...... fantastic display !
I agree he looks like he's been doing this for years.
Totaly self assured.
Always does the simple things, was not in the least over-awed by that bruiser Roberts.
Even went past their full back a couple of times and produce good crosses.
What a propect.
COYR
dadofmy3sons
says...
6:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
DisplacedFan
says...
6:31pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill: I thought Guly added to the team today with some nice touches.
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
Crossley Place Saint
says...
6:31pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.
Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
6:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
DisplacedFan
says...
6:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:Agree. If Nigel has confidence in him, that's good enough for me. I might not like all he does all the time, but booing a team player is unconscionable and counterproductive to the team's performance.
Baddesley Bill wrote:He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it.
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.
slugger
says...
6:37pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Crossley Place Saint wrote:can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.
Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
slugger
says...
6:38pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:the 3 points bit i guess .
Crossley Place Saint wrote:can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.
Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
just kidding
says...
6:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12
I agree Puncheon played well today, along with the rest of the team, but if you want a true MAN of the match,then that title belongs to Guly DePrado. Any one that has to put up with that kind of reception every time he comes on has more courage than those low life so called fans who booed him. No one deserves that, no matter what you think of them. Even Nigel rolled his eyes when he heard that. One thing though, seems like the man shrugged it off, cause he played really well in my opinion.
Baddesley Bill
says...
6:41pm Sat 8 Dec 12
DisplacedFan wrote:To be fair...I was a little nervous for NA when he brought Guly on. Proof indeed that the manager generally knows best. The boo boys can do one IMO.
dadofmy3sons wrote:Agree. If Nigel has confidence in him, that's good enough for me. I might not like all he does all the time, but booing a team player is unconscionable and counterproductive to the team's performance.
Baddesley Bill wrote:He is a quality player and probably would play more were it not for Nigel having to worry about "supporters" who boo their own players and undermine all confidence not only of the player coming on, but also the players on the pitch who also hear it.
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
A person behind me started to rant about Guly and several people told him to shut it! So glad to see him quiten down and keep his mouth shut for 5 minutes, more fans should do that.
Crossley Place Saint
says...
6:44pm Sat 8 Dec 12
just kidding wrote:can't find a single bit of this post to disagree with :-)
I agree Puncheon played well today, along with the rest of the team, but if you want a true MAN of the match,then that title belongs to Guly DePrado. Any one that has to put up with that kind of reception every time he comes on has more courage than those low life so called fans who booed him. No one deserves that, no matter what you think of them. Even Nigel rolled his eyes when he heard that. One thing though, seems like the man shrugged it off, cause he played really well in my opinion.
Littleton-Saint
says...
6:48pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Let's just hope Adam's injury isn't serious. Great to see us out of the drop-zone.
CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger
says...
6:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12
If you boo'd Guly today fcuk you!!!
Big up for Saints number 1 keeper Super Kelv and wot a player Shaw is..
Coyr
Big up for Saints number 1 keeper Super Kelv and wot a player Shaw is..
Coyr
Saintsayer II
says...
7:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12
For me MotM was Luke Shaw because of the way he coped with Roberts who tried to muscle him out of it but totally failed
There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt
To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0
There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt
To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0
angus mc coatup
says...
7:08pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Saintsayer II wrote:like !!
For me MotM was Luke Shaw because of the way he coped with Roberts who tried to muscle him out of it but totally failed
There were many contenders, Jay Rod had his best game so far, Cork and Spiderman bossed mid-field whilst Punch and Clyne made that side of the pitch their own. Althogh he wasn't on long enough to get MotM Guly played well and so nearly put it to bed Nobody can or should criticise his performance to-day and they should never ever boo any player in a Saints shirt
To quote Bill Shankly we annhialated them 1-0
dadofmy3sons
says...
7:14pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Complete anorak that I am, I have been on 6 different sites to read reports on the game and all of them state that it should have been by a greater margin.
Good....but bad!
Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us.
We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today.
Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis.
One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw.
Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne.
So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch.
Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance.
Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter.
Good....but bad!
Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us.
We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today.
Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis.
One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw.
Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne.
So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch.
Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance.
Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter.
Baddesley Bill
says...
7:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:Fair point...we do seem accomplished at bringing the ball forward...but if only we could create the space in the opposing box to get the shot away...we'd win games like today by 3 or 4 goals.
Complete anorak that I am, I have been on 6 different sites to read reports on the game and all of them state that it should have been by a greater margin.
Good....but bad!
Our reputation is as a free scoring team and we only scored one against a team lower in the table than us.
We also have a reputation as the worst defence, clean sheet today.
Known for fielding the youngest team, average age pushed up by old man Davis.
One of the most polished performances was from the youngest player on the pitch, Shaw.
Followed closely by the other young full back , Clyne.
So far none of the sites have adequately explained the ruling out of the first goal by Punch.
Most of the supporters around me were happy with all the players who turned in another good performance.
Shame about the tw4t who maligns every player and claims to be a Saints supporter.
Regardless of anything....I am a very happy Saint tonight! :0)
Costa Baz
says...
7:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward.
He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.
Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.
Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.
Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.
Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
OSPREYSAINT
says...
7:32pm Sat 8 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:My little nephew said that Fonte took the armband after Lala went off. I too thought Guly did well, because he was in the position where he is the most dangerous to the opposition and he was unlucky not to be on the scoresheet. Shaw was outstanding, Puncheons first "goal" should not have been ruled out, but the Referee got most things right. What a brave guy Yosh is he was really caught a good one. Disappointed in La Fondres performance and had spent more time playing football than arguing the toss he may have been more effective. I thought Spider wasn't as effective as usual, that fifth card hanging over him seems to be affecting his aggression. Shouldn't grumble, it was a good team performance and a much needed win. Just regretting a long wait 'til the next game, but at least it will give Lala more recovery time.
No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game.
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
slugger
says...
7:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Costa Baz wrote:isn't it nice when people can't agree on motm ? ........ just shows how far we've come ....... same as you for the poor fella who was taken ill .
Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward.
He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.
Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.
Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
Scruffygirl94
says...
7:38pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Can I make a plea please to all those who booed Guly....DON'T! Give the guy a chance! I thought he was brilliant today and was so willing him to score which he so nearly did just to prove those doubters wrong. I do wish people would trust Nigel's judgement. If he thinks Guly should come on then he should come on so can those booing supporters just start being a little more positive like the manager for a change.
Thornhill Saint
says...
7:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12
A decent display from the team. We were neater and hungrier than Reading today.
I am still not sue Rodriguez and Lambert should play together. I don't think Rodriguez was that bead, but I would like to see what Mayuka can do. Our two full backs are class, and the centre backs looked solid today
Puncheon and Clyne linking up down the right is particularly potent threat. Puncheon aside we still look a little shy to shoot however. Lambert's effort in the first half was class.
A titanic battle between Shaw and Roberts. Both played well and kept each other busy. It was good to see Le Fondre have an off day. I still cringe a bit when I think of how he and Reading took us to the cleaners last season.
Unfortunately when he comes on it has a detrimental effect on the crowd. Some boo. Some others tell those that boo to shut up. The singing stops and the murmuring is deafening as everybody discusses.the Guly factor. None of it is his fault really. All he can do is his best when he comes on. He made a positive impact today. Some of the more cynical sorts kept saying, "Who is he?" and "Is that the same Guly". As Dave Merrington said, he gets knocked all the time. When a player deserves it is it so difficult to simply say "He played well".
I hope Lallana is OK. Not a bad time to have a couple of weeks off. Onwards and upwards!!!
I am still not sue Rodriguez and Lambert should play together. I don't think Rodriguez was that bead, but I would like to see what Mayuka can do. Our two full backs are class, and the centre backs looked solid today
Puncheon and Clyne linking up down the right is particularly potent threat. Puncheon aside we still look a little shy to shoot however. Lambert's effort in the first half was class.
A titanic battle between Shaw and Roberts. Both played well and kept each other busy. It was good to see Le Fondre have an off day. I still cringe a bit when I think of how he and Reading took us to the cleaners last season.
Unfortunately when he comes on it has a detrimental effect on the crowd. Some boo. Some others tell those that boo to shut up. The singing stops and the murmuring is deafening as everybody discusses.the Guly factor. None of it is his fault really. All he can do is his best when he comes on. He made a positive impact today. Some of the more cynical sorts kept saying, "Who is he?" and "Is that the same Guly". As Dave Merrington said, he gets knocked all the time. When a player deserves it is it so difficult to simply say "He played well".
I hope Lallana is OK. Not a bad time to have a couple of weeks off. Onwards and upwards!!!
OSPREYSAINT
says...
7:42pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
dadofmy3sons wrote:You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
OSPREYSAINT
says...
7:45pm Sat 8 Dec 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Sorry I missed out "Roberts" after La Fondre insert between 'had' and 'spent'!
dadofmy3sons wrote:My little nephew said that Fonte took the armband after Lala went off. I too thought Guly did well, because he was in the position where he is the most dangerous to the opposition and he was unlucky not to be on the scoresheet. Shaw was outstanding, Puncheons first "goal" should not have been ruled out, but the Referee got most things right. What a brave guy Yosh is he was really caught a good one. Disappointed in La Fondres performance and had spent more time playing football than arguing the toss he may have been more effective. I thought Spider wasn't as effective as usual, that fifth card hanging over him seems to be affecting his aggression. Shouldn't grumble, it was a good team performance and a much needed win. Just regretting a long wait 'til the next game, but at least it will give Lala more recovery time.
No coincidence the turn around started when Cork came into the team, and has continued while he calmly and quietly gets on with the game.
The whole team now seems to be more sure of themselves and appear to be settled.
This begs the question, do we really need to sign anyone in January?
Would it help or would it disrupt?
We all have said that another centre back would be good, but who of genuine quality is available?
When Adam went off, who took the arm band?
slugger
says...
7:47pm Sat 8 Dec 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:echo that ospreysaint , support the whole team ...... how hard can it be if you're a saint ?
Bring back Branfoot wrote:In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
dadofmy3sons wrote:You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
Reality-man
says...
7:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:I'm with you slugger, something about this comment smells a little fishy
Crossley Place Saint wrote:can't find a single bit of this post to agree with .
Well I'm a lot happier this evening, 3 priceless points (6 really) which might make all the difference at the end of the season.
Nige's comments are exactly what was in my mind when I left the ground. Punch has really been our best value player this season, ever since that fabulous goal in the friendly. Sir Rickie seems confused, unsure whether he is supposed to be playing as a goalscorer or in support of the "other" strikers. J-Rod seems a complete waste of money, Burnley must be laughing at how they took us for £7M and I just hope we can offload him in January. Ramirez still does not convince me and I worry about how his high wages may have unsettled other players. And the goalkeeper problems... Punch is the one player who has been absolutely reliable all season, thank goodness Nicola saw sense and ended the feud that kept him out of the side for so long.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
7:51pm Sat 8 Dec 12
I blame Fox :)
Baddesley Bill
says...
7:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Not just me then :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
dadofmy3sons wrote:You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
SaintinCanada
says...
7:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Scruffygirl94 wrote:Well said!!!
Can I make a plea please to all those who booed Guly....DON'T! Give the guy a chance! I thought he was brilliant today and was so willing him to score which he so nearly did just to prove those doubters wrong. I do wish people would trust Nigel's judgement. If he thinks Guly should come on then he should come on so can those booing supporters just start being a little more positive like the manager for a change.
Velleity
says...
7:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12
I blame Guly.
Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one.
Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one.
slugger
says...
7:56pm Sat 8 Dec 12
an almost fish free site , how nice .
dadofmy3sons
says...
7:56pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Anybody care how Poopey got on?
slugger
says...
8:00pm Sat 8 Dec 12
i also thought yoshida and jose had good games , any advance ?
Scunthorpe United
says...
8:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12
10 points out of 15 in the last five matches - well done to Nigel (and Andy) and the boys!
Keep the faith! The glass is half full!
Keep the faith! The glass is half full!
Tye-Dye pt2
says...
8:06pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
!
RedArmy1
says...
8:09pm Sat 8 Dec 12
GREAT RESULT TODAY !!
WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY
NOW ????
Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well.
RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY
WE RULE THE SOUTH.
WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY
NOW ????
Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well.
RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY
WE RULE THE SOUTH.
Velleity
says...
8:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:OSPers you think he was sublime? Le Tissier was sublime, in certain matches. Do Prado was threatening because he was played in his correct position. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that the fans should lay off him, but Premiership quality, I'm skeptical. Hope he proves me wrong!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
dadofmy3sons wrote:You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
8:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12
RedArmy1 wrote:I'm going. And so our my 20 other personalities.
GREAT RESULT TODAY !!
WHOSE UP FOR FULHAM AWAY
NOW ????
Remaining Tickets up for grabs Monday and then there is the Neutral Stand as well.
RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY-RED ARMY
WE RULE THE SOUTH.
It's all good. Like the Newcastle game you can't pick a bad man of the match. For me Punch didn't have his best game, but he scored twice.
Was in aap3 box today. Nice people, very supportive of the club they sponsor - they do away games. The futures brght - it's red and a bit of white!
RedArmy1
says...
8:21pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Guly looked good today.
OSPREYSAINT wrote:OSPers you think he was sublime? Le Tissier was sublime, in certain matches. Do Prado was threatening because he was played in his correct position. Don't get me wrong, I agree with you that the fans should lay off him, but Premiership quality, I'm skeptical. Hope he proves me wrong!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:In your opinion of course, I beg to differ, I suspect we haven't seen the best that he can do yet, and supporters who get on his back aren't going to improve the situation.
dadofmy3sons wrote:You think he was sublime? Much better than his usual this season, yes, even good, but sublime, no. Unfortunately, he's not Premiership calibre.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:no it's not.
Baddesley Bill wrote:It's just you!
A quality gritty display from us today. Easier to pick out the staing roles from both Punch and Luke than it is to find any criticism of any of our team.
Is it just me...or did Guly look sublime when he came on? I really want him to prove the doubters wrong.
ALL THE TEAM PLAYED WELL.
Luke Shaw is tenacious and was Quality.
RED ARMY RULE THE SOUTH.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:23pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Costa Baz
says...
8:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:It was a good team performance against a poor Reading team that looks destined to go back down.
Costa Baz wrote:isn't it nice when people can't agree on motm ? ........ just shows how far we've come ....... same as you for the poor fella who was taken ill .
Cork was my MOTM and you can see why the defence has improved just by watching how he drops into the full back positions when we lose possession and the full backs have gone forward.
He battled strongly as well, especially 2nd half keeping Reading pushed back.
Fonte was royally p1ssed off with the crowd reaction to Guly being booed, shrugging and holding his arms out before encouraging the crowd to applaud his entrance, and what a good cameo he gave. Brilliant first touch and passing.
Final thoughts are with the Saints fan, under the Kingsland stand who was receiving chest compressions in an attempt to save his life, as the crowd left.
Don't know if it's been mentioned anywhere else, but I hope he survived!!!!
Always good to disagree on MOTM.
Also good to discuss football on a football thread.
Long may it continue.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:28pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Velleity wrote:Now that's a wise comment! Booing your own player is plain dumb! But on here, fans should be allowed to voice their opinions on a player, without the Stepford wives going ape!
I blame Guly.
Most of the booing seemed to be coming from the Kingsland. They should be ashamed of themselves.
Whatever anyone thinks, booing a player coming onto the pitch can NEVER help your team to win. Idiots, every one.
slugger
says...
8:30pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
toutlaw
says...
8:32pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
Baddesley Bill
says...
8:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
slugger
says...
8:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:is that football talk ? ........ i may just report this , anyone else ?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:36pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:He calls me a w, And I can't give a bit back. See you're proving my point, you are just a dummy!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:is that football talk ? ........ i may just report this , anyone else ?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
slugger
says...
8:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:i'm a saint and you aint ...... ta ta .
slugger wrote:Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Baddesley Bill
says...
8:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Skunt :0)
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:41pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Another thing, I like this, everybody knows that the most regular visitors of you have multiple users! You all come on at the same time! Bill, Angus and slugger are the same. But the funniest thing of all is that you still come off second best in the spats! Incredible, unbelievable, but totally brilliant! Lol
boilerman
says...
8:42pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Good three points, should have won by more as a little bit nervous every time we gave away free kicks around the box.
I thought Reading got away with a lot yet we seemed to get pulled up more by the ref.
Well done Nigel and the boys bring on Sunderland and lets destroy them to improve our goal difference, onwards and upwards.
I thought Reading got away with a lot yet we seemed to get pulled up more by the ref.
Well done Nigel and the boys bring on Sunderland and lets destroy them to improve our goal difference, onwards and upwards.
slugger
says...
8:46pm Sat 8 Dec 12
also good results around us today , i have a good feeling about the rest of our season .......... i believe we're only 11 points from a champion league spot , how positive is that ?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
8:47pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:As I said, you're a totalwanker.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Anyone who comes on here naming himself after the most hated manager we've ever had, slags of the 'orange' manager and the players, and sides with the skunts is atwat.
I really hope you're a skunt. if you are a saint then you bring shame on us all.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:47pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
8:48pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Baddesley Bill
says...
8:51pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:So...we are agreed..you lost the plot then...cheers :0)
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Little Hitler
says...
8:52pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Big mouth Bring Back Branfoot's blown a fuse!
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:52pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:You bring shame on us! I remember the amount of students from other cities, studying here, who used to take the p1ss out All locals, because of d1cks like you. They had us all down as a bunch of yokels, because of vegetables like you, no offence! Call a spade a spade and all that!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:As I said, you're a totalwanker.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Anyone who comes on here naming himself after the most hated manager we've ever had, slags of the 'orange' manager and the players, and sides with the skunts is atwat.
I really hope you're a skunt. if you are a saint then you bring shame on us all.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
8:52pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:You're getting desperate. Go to bed.
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
angus mc coatup
says...
8:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
Velleity
says...
8:53pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:I don't wind "the Skates" up. If you can find a post where I've ever used that word, for a start, I'll give you a tenner. I'm all for just ignoring them.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
I call them Portsmouth fans (as above) as I simply don't buy into any football hatred. I know a Man U fan whose life was ruined by hooligans (incidentally wearing Saints colours) and I never, ever join in when the songs are aimed at Portsmouth.
However, I dislike their constant and tediously unfunny posts on here, though I like some of the Portsmouth posters who actually think and try to banter rather than drip feed hate.
Unfortunately, you side with the unfunny idiots (kent, scooter, et al) often enough that I suspect you are one of them. Joining the gang of unpleasant posters from Porstmouth is possibly not the way to be taken seriously (or even seen to be a Saints fan).
I'm sure your response will be abusive but before you do, you might want to consider whether there might be anything true in what I'm saying.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Desperate is creating multiple usernames and spending your whole life on a thread! Quick, log someone else in to agree with you. Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:You're getting desperate. Go to bed.
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
8:57pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Oh dear. Nurse!
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Desperate is creating multiple usernames and spending your whole life on a thread! Quick, log someone else in to agree with you. Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:You're getting desperate. Go to bed.
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Bring back Branfoot
says...
8:58pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Velleity wrote:Now this person doesn't agree with me and backs up his points with valid reasons and is polite! You I respect! The rest of the wives should take a leaf out Valleity's book!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:I don't wind "the Skates" up. If you can find a post where I've ever used that word, for a start, I'll give you a tenner. I'm all for just ignoring them.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
I call them Portsmouth fans (as above) as I simply don't buy into any football hatred. I know a Man U fan whose life was ruined by hooligans (incidentally wearing Saints colours) and I never, ever join in when the songs are aimed at Portsmouth.
However, I dislike their constant and tediously unfunny posts on here, though I like some of the Portsmouth posters who actually think and try to banter rather than drip feed hate.
Unfortunately, you side with the unfunny idiots (kent, scooter, et al) often enough that I suspect you are one of them. Joining the gang of unpleasant posters from Porstmouth is possibly not the way to be taken seriously (or even seen to be a Saints fan).
I'm sure your response will be abusive but before you do, you might want to consider whether there might be anything true in what I'm saying.
mack chinnon
says...
9:00pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Baddesley Bill wrote:I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Velleity
says...
9:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Hadn't read this when I posted last.
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Who's judging that you get the best of the witty retorts? Ah, you, of course. Makes your opinion .... well .... worthless, frankly.
I don't see anyone (bar your friends Kent, Moreglory and Scooter) telling you that you're funny.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
9:03pm Sat 8 Dec 12
mack chinnon wrote:Sadly I didn't get that far :(
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Baddesley Bill wrote:I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:06pm Sat 8 Dec 12
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
9:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.
Baddesley Bill
says...
9:07pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:That's democracy for ya!
mack chinnon wrote:Sadly I didn't get that far :(
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Baddesley Bill wrote:I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Little Hitler
says...
9:09pm Sat 8 Dec 12
I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then.
There there, there there...
There there, there there...
F Fan
says...
9:10pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Quite right. I do sometimes laugh and sometimes get angry at posts that are stupid and/or abusive. Yours are usually both.
slugger wrote:Exactly my point! You're all so dumb, do you realise there are people who visit these threads, that never post, they just have a quick glance to laugh at the stupidity of posters like you! Fishy ace, hilarious! Lol prat!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:don't be annoyed when the majority disagree with you then , we live in a democracy ......... a saint siding with a skate ? .... i think not fishface !
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Guly looked fit and up for it today. I do think he is much better playing up front than in midfield. Holds the ball pretty well, very good pass completion and has a touch of class on the ball. Disgraceful booing when he came on. Best fans in the country? I think not.
Rodriguez did better today – worked really hard - but his touch isn’t great and he is too selfish when near to goal.
Shaw is just awesome – period - not just for his age. Early days yet but after Cole and Baines, who is a better English left back at the moment?
Fonte is getting much better as he gets to the pace of the PL and Yashida reads the play so well. But his distribution is poor. Puncheon and Clyne are shaping up as a pretty formidable partnership.
Interesting piece by Jim White in the Telegraph today on how the increase in goals lost by the top teams this season may be linked to full backs struggling to cope with the 4231 formation imported from Spain. With the 3 roaming all over the place, full backs don’t have an obvious person to mark and are sucked up field and in field, leaving space behind them – think Danny Fox and these open swathes that cost us dearly early on in the season. Cork is so good at covering that we get away with it more now and Shaw is simply better than Fox.
slugger
says...
9:11pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:absobloodylutely ........ 11 points from champions league !
Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.
Baddesley Bill
says...
9:12pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Little Hitler wrote:I'm perplexed ..they should be celebrating their point against the L1 leaders today....
I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then.
There there, there there...
...Tranmere I think.
Puddletown Saint
says...
9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Hey guys - there was a football match today that we won:
Davis 7 Calming
Clyne 8 Future England
Shaw 8 Now England
Fonte 7 Improving
Yosida 7 Steady
Punch 8 Impressive
Lallana 7 Hope he is okay
Cork 8 Makes the difference
Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion
Lambert 7 Team player
Jay Rod 7 His best game
Gaston 7 More central
Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception
2 weeks seems a long time COYR
Davis 7 Calming
Clyne 8 Future England
Shaw 8 Now England
Fonte 7 Improving
Yosida 7 Steady
Punch 8 Impressive
Lallana 7 Hope he is okay
Cork 8 Makes the difference
Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion
Lambert 7 Team player
Jay Rod 7 His best game
Gaston 7 More central
Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception
2 weeks seems a long time COYR
mack chinnon
says...
9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Little Hitler wrote:NO. Support Preston.
I guess we should have expected the fishies to go full retard, it being their final week of existence and all. We must all support then.
There there, there there...
angus mc coatup
says...
9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:13pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Stroppy_gramps
says...
9:14pm Sat 8 Dec 12
With regard to Do Prado
The only response to the boos is for the rest of the fans to cheer louder.
I think it's because he's a bit like the French Rugby team.
You never what is going to turn up - a sublime, effortless player like today or just baggage that the rest of the team has to play around
That's kind of frustrating to watch when your team is fighting to get out of the relegation zone. So I'm not surprised some fans have the knives out for him.
I really really hope that he can keep up more performances like today. I said it in another thread and I'll say it here - I'm no Guly fan but today he was superb and another 5 minutes in the game and he would have scored.
As for the rest..... the whole team can be motm for me. Shaw is shaping up wonderfully - a very mature performance today, especially when he wouldn't allow himself to be muscled off the ball.
Davis put in a solid performance but wasn't really given any problem shots to deal with. The movement off the ball by the whole time was brilliant.
I thought the referee was shocking in general -for both teams.
The only response to the boos is for the rest of the fans to cheer louder.
I think it's because he's a bit like the French Rugby team.
You never what is going to turn up - a sublime, effortless player like today or just baggage that the rest of the team has to play around
That's kind of frustrating to watch when your team is fighting to get out of the relegation zone. So I'm not surprised some fans have the knives out for him.
I really really hope that he can keep up more performances like today. I said it in another thread and I'll say it here - I'm no Guly fan but today he was superb and another 5 minutes in the game and he would have scored.
As for the rest..... the whole team can be motm for me. Shaw is shaping up wonderfully - a very mature performance today, especially when he wouldn't allow himself to be muscled off the ball.
Davis put in a solid performance but wasn't really given any problem shots to deal with. The movement off the ball by the whole time was brilliant.
I thought the referee was shocking in general -for both teams.
penalty
says...
9:15pm Sat 8 Dec 12
My motm is jose- i thought he was awesome today. Gaston did well when he came on. Jayrod did ok against a poor Reading backline-it's true he needs the experience but he'll struggle to make an impact against the better sides this season- i think Saints see him as a long term successor for SRL. Guly looked up for it today and was actually played in the correct position.
Great to see us move up the table...Looking forward to whipping Sunderland.
Red Army!!
Great to see us move up the table...Looking forward to whipping Sunderland.
Red Army!!
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
9:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:No, it's the tory party. If I'd got in front of the electorate i'd have romped it!
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:That's democracy for ya!
mack chinnon wrote:Sadly I didn't get that far :(
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Fiddiling your expense,s were you.
Baddesley Bill wrote:I was in politics. It didn't work out...
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Concise...and to the point. Don't ever take up politics Seed! :0)
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Reading got Sunderland this Tuesday I think, a draw would be nice.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:16pm Sat 8 Dec 12
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:19pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
9:24pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff.
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Stroppy_gramps
says...
9:26pm Sat 8 Dec 12
can you guys just stop?
or if you feel the need to continue get a room?
or if you feel the need to continue get a room?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
9:26pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Puddletown Saint wrote:Pretty spot on!
Hey guys - there was a football match today that we won:
Davis 7 Calming
Clyne 8 Future England
Shaw 8 Now England
Fonte 7 Improving
Yosida 7 Steady
Punch 8 Impressive
Lallana 7 Hope he is okay
Cork 8 Makes the difference
Spider 7 Bring back his aggresion
Lambert 7 Team player
Jay Rod 7 His best game
Gaston 7 More central
Guly 10 Nobody deserves that reception
2 weeks seems a long time COYR
Plus Guly did exactly what he was brought on to do, keeping the pressure off, and could have won it earlier. Good performance.
slugger
says...
9:30pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Stroppy_gramps wrote:i suggest you report any post you feel is abusive , that's what i do .
can you guys just stop?
or if you feel the need to continue get a room?
angus mc coatup
says...
9:31pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Oh seed! Can't raise the flag! Trying to compensate! Easy to say that over the Internet! Not as easy to say to a big bugger's face! You're a joke!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff.
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:34pm Sat 8 Dec 12
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
mark5
says...
9:35pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
pompey in spain
says...
9:37pm Sat 8 Dec 12
now now now...are you all having a go at each other!! for what its worth badd bill isnt that bad, and seedhouse is funny, but its got to be said of late both and a few others have not let their funny sides out when putting people down ...personally i thought its coz the pressure of the way your season was going ..so understandable.lots more to come boys.
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:40pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
slugger
says...
9:43pm Sat 8 Dec 12
mark5 wrote:cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:43pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Nighty night, Mr Trump!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
popper
says...
9:45pm Sat 8 Dec 12
this is all down to Nigel Adkins and his management.
He has instilled a commarardary between Puncheon and Clyne. When one makes a mistake, the other covers. When one takes a risk and does a run, the other covers.
They are friends knowing they are more when they work together.
When Punchon scored the first thing he did was point to his mucker Clyne.
Nigle understands how to get the best out of a previously stroppy Puncheon.
Make him part of a mini team. He may not want to do the best for himself but will never let hs friend Clyne down. Its working time and time again.
Onwards and upwards with this group of players and Nigel getting the best out of them
He has instilled a commarardary between Puncheon and Clyne. When one makes a mistake, the other covers. When one takes a risk and does a run, the other covers.
They are friends knowing they are more when they work together.
When Punchon scored the first thing he did was point to his mucker Clyne.
Nigle understands how to get the best out of a previously stroppy Puncheon.
Make him part of a mini team. He may not want to do the best for himself but will never let hs friend Clyne down. Its working time and time again.
Onwards and upwards with this group of players and Nigel getting the best out of them
angus mc coatup
says...
9:48pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Is that it, is that your clever and very witty reponse.
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
anyway football,can't fault anyone today
and good to see kelvin back.the back four looked tight an very much together.
the work in progress sign is still up,but we are getting there.and fontes response to the booing of gully was great.
coyr
Baddesley Bill
says...
9:49pm Sat 8 Dec 12
He's lost it again...
...anyway...onto football...I'm rather proud about the way NA has conducted himself this season. He's stuck to the task and ignored the 'sack race' ****.
So far so good...if improvement gathers pace, then a mid table place should be assured.
My bet is looking safe ghk! :0)
...anyway...onto football...I'm rather proud about the way NA has conducted himself this season. He's stuck to the task and ignored the 'sack race' ****.
So far so good...if improvement gathers pace, then a mid table place should be assured.
My bet is looking safe ghk! :0)
mark5
says...
9:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.
mark5 wrote:cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
Confucious
says...
9:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Thanks Saints. That 15th place looks good tonight. Match of the Day and Football First are on record for repeat performances tomorrow - and the Sunday papers will be savoured this week.
Guly's reception the one downside, but his excellent performance despite that must have embarrassed any of the boo boys capable of rational thought. Well done Guly - that takes guts.
And to top it all there's only one WUM on here and he seems particularly stupid as a lone looney. Tomorrow morning he should go down to morgue and say "I think I'm ready."
Guly's reception the one downside, but his excellent performance despite that must have embarrassed any of the boo boys capable of rational thought. Well done Guly - that takes guts.
And to top it all there's only one WUM on here and he seems particularly stupid as a lone looney. Tomorrow morning he should go down to morgue and say "I think I'm ready."
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
9:50pm Sat 8 Dec 12
pompey in spain wrote:It is quite tense. Games come about - QPR away, Reading at home - that have to be won or we'd be adrift. They have been won and a great win against Newcastle and an ok point against Norwich. Crap at Liverpool but back to winning ways today. We're giving ourselves a good chance.
now now now...are you all having a go at each other!! for what its worth badd bill isnt that bad, and seedhouse is funny, but its got to be said of late both and a few others have not let their funny sides out when putting people down ...personally i thought its coz the pressure of the way your season was going ..so understandable.lots more to come boys.
angus mc coatup
says...
9:58pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"
Bring back Branfoot wrote:By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Nighty night, Mr Trump!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
Bring back Branfoot
says...
9:59pm Sat 8 Dec 12
angus mc coatup wrote:As I thought! It's chicken tonight! Go count your Monoply money, pleb!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"
Bring back Branfoot wrote:By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Nighty night, Mr Trump!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
OSPREYSAINT
says...
10:01pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:I reckon it's time for the old feather dusters at 200 yards at dawn again.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Nighty night, Mr Trump!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
angus mc coatup
says...
10:04pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:more money than you can dream of fella
angus mc coatup wrote:As I thought! It's chicken tonight! Go count your Monoply money, pleb!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:I say, steady on "poppet" your making a bit of a tw@t of yourself " dearie"
Bring back Branfoot wrote:By the way Angus, you ever want to call me a "feckin tw@t" to my face, it could be arranged! Ponce!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Nighty night, Mr Trump!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Property market! Who are you kidding! I don't think Monoply counts, p1n head! Lol. This is so easy!
angus mc coatup wrote:Prat! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you really are not the clever wit you think you are.I was lucky enough to have made a considerable amount of money fom the property market. and I haven't had to work for some years.so you carry on thinkig that you're really clever and witty.meanwhile I'll continue to spend my hard earned.... and laugh my bo!!ox of at you with your head so far up your own arris your nearly inside out.
Bring back Branfoot wrote:On a serious point, are you really on jobseekers? He hit low with that one!
angus mc coatup wrote:Oh you're so tough Angus! With broadline cable between us! Prat! You got made to look like a d1ck! Myself and other saints fans who read it, actually felt sorry for you! Lol
Bring back Branfoot wrote:how can pointless, inane comments like calling people dearie, or poppet, make anyone other than that poster look foolish.and this is a saints fans forum in case you aint noticed... so go fcuk yaself .
angus mc coatup wrote:And all of a sudden Angus comes out of the woodwork. What a surprise! If you hadn't been made to look such a total fool by the dominatrix over the last few days, you might have been worth insulting. Go away Angus!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:you to$$er. this Is a saints forum and If you don't like what you read then fcuk off to a site that more to your liking.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Who are you? You little pr1ck! You're a nobody, with sh1tty little views, who has become open season amongst the skates! Why? Because you're a dummy with no comebacks! Watch your mouth with me you d1ckhead!
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Fuckoff. Everone sees you for the totalwanker you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
lots of people that frequent this forum disagree with each other.thats what it's all about.but you and your mates are just tw@ts.and add absolutley fck all to It. so just do one...... ya knob
feckin tw@t
so I can just sit back and laugh at you calling.... me a pleb !... now that is funny
Velleity
says...
10:08pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:As I said before, I don't see anyone (bar your friends Kent, Moreglory and Scooter) telling you that you're funny.
Guys, is that it? Nothing, not even a little funny? Same old replies? And Seed, hope to see you in the Josh! I'll treat you to pint!
Scrutinizer
says...
10:10pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!
P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
slugger
says...
10:11pm Sat 8 Dec 12
mark5 wrote:piece of cake this managing lark eh ? ........ what do you reckon to our trolls ............ dumb or what ? ...... good luck to the albion , after all your club has been been through you've come out the other end with your heads held high because it's been done honestly without ripping anyone else off .......... totally the opposite of our eastern neighbors ....... they just cheat and cheat and cheat !
slugger wrote:Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.
mark5 wrote:cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
angus mc coatup
says...
10:12pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Scrutinizer wrote:yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!
P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
One Heart....One Vision
says...
10:20pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Today's result was made even better cosidering team around us dropped points at home....one well done Jason for another winning goal.
BracknellSaint
says...
10:26pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Funny eh
We get a shedload of various saints fans on here, and the skunts all seem obsessed with multiple personas. why would we need that? We're a top flight, biggest south coast , and superior league position for most of last 40-50 years CLUB.
When THEY can get 24k plus regular in League 1, 28k plus in the championship, and like now, 32k easily every week in the Premier, maybe they can take the Michael.
As it is, we've got plenty of fans thanks( unlike the blue few) so we can get a whole thread with loads of people, without needing to cheat..
Which the skunts are absolute experts at, after all !
We get a shedload of various saints fans on here, and the skunts all seem obsessed with multiple personas. why would we need that? We're a top flight, biggest south coast , and superior league position for most of last 40-50 years CLUB.
When THEY can get 24k plus regular in League 1, 28k plus in the championship, and like now, 32k easily every week in the Premier, maybe they can take the Michael.
As it is, we've got plenty of fans thanks( unlike the blue few) so we can get a whole thread with loads of people, without needing to cheat..
Which the skunts are absolute experts at, after all !
Optimist
says...
10:55pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Every game looks winnable again :)
happy days,
COYS!
happy days,
COYS!
SnapperSaint
says...
11:23pm Sat 8 Dec 12
Hooray!!! At last I've got to end of all the quote on quote 'love' sessions above...nearly broke my mouse wheel...!
Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's.
Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff!
Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's.
Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff!
angus mc coatup
says...
12:15am Sun 9 Dec 12
SnapperSaint wrote:yeah! sorry people I'm probably the biggest culprit,at responding to these idiots. but that bbb really is a nob.
Hooray!!! At last I've got to end of all the quote on quote 'love' sessions above...nearly broke my mouse wheel...!
Anyway, back to football...OMG it felt so brilliant getting that win today and climbing up to 15th...really feels like we have something good going on again at St. Mary's.
Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne are just two players that have really helped that turn around, solid defenders but with flare going forward too, excellent stuff!
anyway the way we played today was sensible. and very professional in the way we saw the game through.mr adkins and the team appear to be finding their feet at this level.and the only way is up.
Bungy53
says...
12:34am Sun 9 Dec 12
toutlaw wrote:When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager?
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager.
Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't.
He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch.
Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring.
Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip.
As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out,
Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever.
COYS
st1halo
says...
1:58am Sun 9 Dec 12
toutlaw wrote:I agree
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
Guly may have played well today in the SHORT time he was on but, had he started, i expect it would have been an entirely different story. He's a striker who hasn't scored in a year! and yet amazingly until recently has featured in most games. Imo he isn't prem quality but I'm happy for him to prove me wrong. Booing isn't acceptable though- full stop!!
Fonte seems to get stronger and stronger every game and stepping up which is great to see.
Luke Shaw..... what can you say.... that boy has 100% Premiership quality stamped all over him already!
The bus is rolling!
STID
st1halo
says...
2:11am Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Don't know what's going on there, Sunderland have some quality players and O'neill usually builds strong teams. (he always looks like some sort of pervert PE teacher or something though)
Sunderland are falling apart nicely. Beat them and things look a lot better.
Nick 3 points from them and we'll be making serious progress!
STID
ButtyIoWSaint
says...
2:50am Sun 9 Dec 12
Scrutinizer wrote:EiEiEi O
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!
P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
Up the premier league we go
st1halo
says...
2:50am Sun 9 Dec 12
Bungy53 wrote:Here's a thought
toutlaw wrote:When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager?
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager.
Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't.
He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch.
Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring.
Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip.
As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out,
Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever.
COYS
Read the post - quote the post - agree/disagree with the post
It's as simple as that!
Making personal references as to whether they may be one of the blue few,new fan, new poster is entirely pointless.
The reason that you have had to read through a load of dross above is that some seem unable to remain impersonal and by inserting these innuendos into your posts is exactly how it all begins.
I don't agree that Guly has delivered on all counts because as a striker, he hasn't scored for a year. (I don't condone booing!)
I do agree that we are moving in the right direction though and hope that continues
STID
Velleity
says...
7:16am Sun 9 Dec 12
I think one of the reasons Guly hasn't scored in a year is that he hasn't been played as a striker in that time; he's been shifted to midfield. He's good as a midfielder but not as good as purely up front.
Yesterday he was put up as a striker and I thought we saw the difference.
Whether I'm right or wrong, I'll repeat myself. Booing a player coming onto the pitch is NEVER going to help your team.
Yesterday he was put up as a striker and I thought we saw the difference.
Whether I'm right or wrong, I'll repeat myself. Booing a player coming onto the pitch is NEVER going to help your team.
Clever Dick
says...
8:22am Sun 9 Dec 12
Great result. Not the best game we have played but nobody played badly. Booing of Guly was a disgrace.Well done to Jose Fonte for trying to get the crowd on his side. Both Nigel and NC have taken a lot of flack on and off ever since they arrived and they have always been proven to be right in the end. If NA sees something we don't in Guly I'm happy to let him prove it to us. Good on them too for kissing and making up with Punch. Most of us would have been happy to see the back of him and he's a different player this season. Onwards and upwards. COYR&ALBOW!
St Retford
says...
9:09am Sun 9 Dec 12
Clever Dick wrote:Innit. One thing these past couple of years have taught us is that if you disagree with Nigel or Nicola it's usually because you're wrong.
Great result. Not the best game we have played but nobody played badly. Booing of Guly was a disgrace.Well done to Jose Fonte for trying to get the crowd on his side. Both Nigel and NC have taken a lot of flack on and off ever since they arrived and they have always been proven to be right in the end. If NA sees something we don't in Guly I'm happy to let him prove it to us. Good on them too for kissing and making up with Punch. Most of us would have been happy to see the back of him and he's a different player this season. Onwards and upwards. COYR&ALBOW!
OSPREYSAINT
says...
9:15am Sun 9 Dec 12
Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.
Buddy SFC
says...
9:32am Sun 9 Dec 12
Luke Shaw = Class !!!
The whole Reading game plan was to go deep to Roberts into the Saints LH corner, not only did he cope he played JR out of the game .........
Also Fonte giving the crowd in Kingsland stick for the way they reacted to Guly coming on , and applauding the Northam for singing up for Guly ......... A real team man !!
Just proves how they are a team ''all as one'' !!
The whole Reading game plan was to go deep to Roberts into the Saints LH corner, not only did he cope he played JR out of the game .........
Also Fonte giving the crowd in Kingsland stick for the way they reacted to Guly coming on , and applauding the Northam for singing up for Guly ......... A real team man !!
Just proves how they are a team ''all as one'' !!
Scarborosaint
says...
9:40am Sun 9 Dec 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Totally agree evened out and fair play to tabb who didn't make a meal of the challenge just picked himself up after the tackle.
Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.
The booing of one of our own players is becoming embarrassing and disgraceful regardless of how good, bad or indifferent guly is he is pulling on the saints shirt he deserves and needs encouragement.
Bet the same muppets who booed him yesterday were cheering a year ago when he scored both goals to beat middlesborough , go and support the skates cos they need some more supporters we certainly don't want you if you can't support the boys wearing red and White ( pinstripes)
mark5
says...
9:42am Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Thanks for the compliment Slugger, yes we really have been through the Mill in recent times, losing the Goldstone, exile at Gillingham and then 10 years in the wind and rain at Withdean with a capacity of 8,000. So it is good to he where we are today. Don't think I should be drawn into the "debate" about Pompey though, we have no axes to grind with them. However, Croydon F.C is another story...............
mark5 wrote:piece of cake this managing lark eh ? ........ what do you reckon to our trolls ............ dumb or what ? ...... good luck to the albion , after all your club has been been through you've come out the other end with your heads held high because it's been done honestly without ripping anyone else off .......... totally the opposite of our eastern neighbors ....... they just cheat and cheat and cheat !
slugger wrote:Yep, Dean is doing well generally, a good, strong midfield prescence, who does not let you down. Funny as two weeks before he signed, I was saying that we could do with someone like Dean Hammond to shore up the midfield.........!! Perhaps I should be managing BHA! Ha,ha.
mark5 wrote:cheers mark5 , long time indeed , no real fans (imo) were calling for nigel's head ....... how's dean hammond doing ?
Hi Slugger, Saint Kenny and others of our Saints mates along the coast. Long time no speak! Just wanted to say well done and congratulations for Saints kick starting their season and pulling out of the danger zone! Nigel has done a great job and will continue to do so! Shame on some of your fans calling for his head early on! Don't think we shall be joining you in the Prem still next year, but hope it won't be too long! U.T.A
.!! Ha,ha,ha Good luck for your season, mid table or thereabouts seems achievable to me and that would be a great achievement first season back in the Prem!!
Ross123
says...
10:00am Sun 9 Dec 12
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
SnapperSaint
says...
10:04am Sun 9 Dec 12
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Agreed, that's just the way I saw it on MOTD...balanced out...
Morning all, lots of good posts on this thread, BbB did his worst to ruin it for some reason, but I showed great restraint and didn't respond! In the cold light of day and having seen several replays, I came to the conclusion that the Referee was generally OK, but that the Puncheon "goal" being disallowed was a clanger. He may have awarded a penalty for Corks challenge in the first half so I guess that levelled things out.
St Retford
says...
10:10am Sun 9 Dec 12
Ross123 wrote:It's Rickie's birthday so they've all been given permission to have a day out at Alton Towers instead.
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Confucious
says...
10:14am Sun 9 Dec 12
Ross123 wrote:Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
SnapperSaint
says...
10:15am Sun 9 Dec 12
St Retford wrote:Yeah and Raffa has bottled it having seen how good Saints are playing now...
Ross123 wrote:It's Rickie's birthday so they've all been given permission to have a day out at Alton Towers instead.
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
he doesn't want Chelsea to play us until he's got them playing better and he's taken them off to Japan for the week...
puppy saint
says...
10:16am Sun 9 Dec 12
Don't feed the WUM. It might be a self proclaimed comedy genius with a massive ego and delusions of grandeur that doesn't actually attend games but that doesn't seem to stop it.
Ssssshhhuusshhh is the way forward.
Ssssshhhuusshhh is the way forward.
St Retford
says...
10:17am Sun 9 Dec 12
Confucious wrote:Oh yeah - that might also be a factor.
Ross123 wrote:Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
St Retford
says...
10:27am Sun 9 Dec 12
angus mc coatup wrote:I'm not so sure. Has anyone noticed how our improvement in form has coincided with us playing under floodlights? I think that little grey stripe does something under artificial lights which makes the white stripe stand out more and the shirts seem altogether more vibrant and therefore it becomes easier for the players to pick each other out. I know it sounds mental but I swear there's some proper science going on with our shirt design.
Scrutinizer wrote:yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.
Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one!
P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.
puppy saint
says...
10:30am Sun 9 Dec 12
St Retford wrote:Utter b%llocks. Torrez, Matter, Tevez and Cheque are all injured and Chelsea have paid £3 million to each of the Premier League committee to call it off. You lot know nothing about football and are a bunch of dearie petal embarrassments. Innit!
Confucious wrote:Oh yeah - that might also be a factor.
Ross123 wrote:Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
St Retford
says...
10:34am Sun 9 Dec 12
Haha!
Buddy SFC
says...
10:39am Sun 9 Dec 12
St Retford wrote:No just mental ! :-)
angus mc coatup wrote:I'm not so sure. Has anyone noticed how our improvement in form has coincided with us playing under floodlights? I think that little grey stripe does something under artificial lights which makes the white stripe stand out more and the shirts seem altogether more vibrant and therefore it becomes easier for the players to pick each other out. I know it sounds mental but I swear there's some proper science going on with our shirt design.Scrutinizer wrote: Well done Saints!. An absolutely essential win. It would have been a right downer to have lost this one! P.s. We are NOT the Reds. We ARE the Saints. Bring back the red and white stripes.yep, agree with that.... always will be red and white stripes for me as well.
slugger
says...
10:42am Sun 9 Dec 12
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
batesieboy
says...
10:44am Sun 9 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Every argument on its merits. Don't get "pack mentality" confused with the majority usually being right. It is however, true, that there are people on here who think only their opinion (and that of their friends) is the only important one. You know who you are.
Velleity wrote:You people wind the skates up and then complain when they do the same to you. The Stepford wives on here annoy me, this is an open forum to express whatever views you may have. If, even a saints fan, expresses a negative view regarding, for example, NA, the wives go into this pack mentality. I see that, I'll side, even with the skates!
Tye-Dye pt2 wrote:Not sure about that. Branfoot's a serious WUM who sides with our Portsmouth-supportin
Crikey, 42 posts and not one skunt has the minerals to post a moronic comment, Nige must be proving them wrong then? We don't miss you, your just a sympathetic diversion from our historically proven rightful status as the one and only team in Hampshire. With a squad we own, with a 'STADIUM' to be proud of, and heading upward in the acknowledged hardest league in Europe.....Shhhhhhhh
!
g friends whenever people respond to them.
Ssssshhhh.
Rob The Saint NOT in NZ
says...
10:55am Sun 9 Dec 12
Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent.
Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.
The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!
Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".
A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.
It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.
Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.
COYR!
Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.
The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!
Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".
A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.
It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.
Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.
COYR!
PTID1898
says...
11:13am Sun 9 Dec 12
Oh my god get out of the bottom three and all of a sudden you lot think you are great and going to stay up get a grip,get a life get realistic your going down wake up all of you you won't or never will achieve anything or win anything.PUP
Crispinmumbles
says...
11:15am Sun 9 Dec 12
Come on, admit it world, we looked more comfortable and confident at the back with Kelvo twixt the sticks, if he was in to cover an injury, I just hope recuperation takes a while.
Crispinmumbles
says...
11:20am Sun 9 Dec 12
PTID1898 wrote:Does zis not strika you aza lil bit of ze graped that he is not so sweet nes pas (in french accent, rerally couldn't explain why)
Oh my god get out of the bottom three and all of a sudden you lot think you are great and going to stay up get a grip,get a life get realistic your going down wake up all of you you won't or never will achieve anything or win anything.PUP
El Santo
says...
11:25am Sun 9 Dec 12
Rob The Saint NOT in NZ wrote:On the same line, Rob, I just read this in the BBC report of the match: "Roared on by vociferous home support at St Mary's, Saints started the second half impressively..."
Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent.
Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.
The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!
Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".
A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.
It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.
Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.
COYR!
It is certainly not something you read in every report. I do believe that support by fans is making a HUGE difference. We are also playing!!!
puppy saint
says...
11:25am Sun 9 Dec 12
If I didn't have anything good to say about my team and was slightly embarrassed by their current situation then I would probably go onto a rivals site and attempt to destroy their buzz with some devastating, articulate, accurate and withering ridicule.
But I have, I'm not so I won't.
But I have, I'm not so I won't.
RedArmy1
says...
11:30am Sun 9 Dec 12
El Santo wrote:THE FANS ARE MAKING A DIFFERENCE.
Rob The Saint NOT in NZ wrote:On the same line, Rob, I just read this in the BBC report of the match: "Roared on by vociferous home support at St Mary's, Saints started the second half impressively..."
Another enjoyable home game, the 2nd half was excellent.
Again, it is hard to pick out individuals when we are obviously a closely-knit team, but Fonte, Clyne, Puncheon & Cork were excellent.
The goal was excellently created & executed, starting with Rickie's slightly delayed ball to Clyne, through the Reading player's legs - exquisite!
Guly's cameo was a fine display, & hopefully his performance & his team mates' reaction will silence the "boo boys".
A great atmosphere again, aside from the Guly haters. Thought the Reading fans were very quiet all afternoon.
It's great to be back in the Prem & seeing our team respond so well to early setbacks & media pressure.
Finally, my thoughts are with whoever collapsed outside the Kingsland after the game - hope you will be okay.
COYR!
It is certainly not something you read in every report. I do believe that support by fans is making a HUGE difference. We are also playing!!!
Let's take the tempo to the game vs sunderland and fulham away.
Let's get the leadership going to drive the fans to continue to give that vociferous support.
WINNING IS EVERYTHING.
WE ARE RED ARMY. COYR.
up saints
says...
11:45am Sun 9 Dec 12
yes i agree and i will admit iam not the biggest fan of guly.but hats off to him he did his bit yesterday but was nervous when he came on.mom punch need llalana fit asap.
thehoggsback
says...
11:52am Sun 9 Dec 12
Fantastic result yesterday we're beginning to see saints hold there own and escaping relegation is more than possible that's what the skunts have seen as well that's why there overly abusive by the day just keep ignoring them and roll on 14.12.12 when they finally f**k off. COYR
hedge end bob
says...
11:54am Sun 9 Dec 12
I am disappointed after such a big big win for us yesturday, there is so much RUBBISH posted on this site.
When one of the skates or wums that come on here, to just wind people up , JUST IGNORE THE FOOLS. The beano and dandy have better written topics than some of the tripe that's put on here. Who really cares whose dad can beat your dad?? Yes that's how it reads, fed up with it.
PUNCH....That's the way to do it !!!
Well done Gully, played centred he is as good if not better than J R.
Bing on Sunderland another three points.
When one of the skates or wums that come on here, to just wind people up , JUST IGNORE THE FOOLS. The beano and dandy have better written topics than some of the tripe that's put on here. Who really cares whose dad can beat your dad?? Yes that's how it reads, fed up with it.
PUNCH....That's the way to do it !!!
Well done Gully, played centred he is as good if not better than J R.
Bing on Sunderland another three points.
dadofmy3sons
says...
12:04pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Confucious wrote:Well then, why don't we just pop over there and give them a game there?
Ross123 wrote:Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Yosh and Tad could pop indoors and see some mates and the lads could eat some uncooked meat, sushi.
We used to feed Terry Hurlock on raw meat!
circa 66 saint
says...
12:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12
haven't posted for a while mainly because of the flu and partly because the shhhhhhhhhh campaign seems to have stopped.
just an idea but for those that wish to interact with a skunt why not go to the news and do it and return this site to the clean and proper place it can and has been
shshshshshshshshshss
sshhhhhhhh
you know it makes sense
just an idea but for those that wish to interact with a skunt why not go to the news and do it and return this site to the clean and proper place it can and has been
shshshshshshshshshss
sshhhhhhhh
you know it makes sense
thehoggsback
says...
12:17pm Sun 9 Dec 12
I'm going to enjoy watching Sun v Read Tues that ball will be like a hot potato draw 0-0 would be nice COYR.
More Glory
says...
12:24pm Sun 9 Dec 12
puppy saint wrote:Says a lot about you Poppy. I see you are crying out for a bit of attention, so here we are.
If I didn't have anything good to say about my team and was slightly embarrassed by their current situation then I would probably go onto a rivals site and attempt to destroy their buzz with some devastating, articulate, accurate and withering ridicule. But I have, I'm not so I won't.
Well a win yesterday. The Faiiries were the best team, but you got a lot of luck with that penalty. Bad decision by the referee, not a corker at all.
It would have been interesting to come on here, and watch the debate if you had only got a draw. I guess as it was your man of the moment that made the mistake, he can be forgiven.
The disssallowed goal made perfect sense to me, so just accept your luck.
The boo boys I guess won't be staying around when things get tough.
A little present for your fellow wife Belinda
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=rNVcSIZyB
uE
Not the same comic effect as yours, but it really does show how these things can take over. The rolling / running tumbleweed also reminds me of your stadium after the 70th minute.
One thing that you maybe did not know, is that tumbleweed actually came from cold Russia via Flax seeds.
Which reminds me, It's gonna be a long hard winter for you guys. Enjoy your sunday roast or is it beans on toast today.
Let's hope you guys aint too rusty for the Sunderland game.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
41,10,1,58,4
bluewhiteandred
says...
12:25pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Baddesley bill or slugger
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please
YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”
slugger
says...
12:30pm Sun 9 Dec 12
bluewhiteandred wrote:sorry but i have no idea who it is , i do agree that it's wrong though .
slugger wrote:Baddesley bill or slugger
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please
YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”
puppy saint
says...
12:33pm Sun 9 Dec 12
I love a nibble, Poppet x
slugger
says...
12:36pm Sun 9 Dec 12
on the jason puncheon subject i have to admit that i was one of the people saying "get rid of bad rubbish" last year , just like to put on record how happy i am to be proved very wrong .
OSPREYSAINT
says...
12:44pm Sun 9 Dec 12
bluewhiteandred wrote:Steady lad, it's just a Forum, sticks and stones remember, don't respond.
slugger wrote:Baddesley bill or slugger
ahhh , i love sundays after a saints win ......... beautiful !
you know bluewhiteandred on pompey news site can you forward please
YOU KNOW I AM SAVEPORTSMOUTH BECAUSE I TOLD YOU LOT ON ECHO SO WHY THE VERBAL ABUSE . YOU HAVE GOT TO HIDE BEHIND MY ECHO NAME AND HAVE NOT GOT THE DECENCY TO SAY WHO YOU ARE YOU SCARED CHICKEN !”
More Glory
says...
12:48pm Sun 9 Dec 12
puppy saint wrote:overweight by any chance?
I love a nibble, Poppet x
puppy saint
says...
12:49pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:By his own admission he has matured over the last year. All credit to him, Adkins and Cortese. The chairman handled a potentially volatile situation very well. His own performances and the partnership he has built with Clynne have been one of the very positive features of our play this season.
on the jason puncheon subject i have to admit that i was one of the people saying "get rid of bad rubbish" last year , just like to put on record how happy i am to be proved very wrong .
promised land
says...
12:53pm Sun 9 Dec 12
The part time fans who turn up at St Mary's and booed Guly ? Do you realise your actions are insulting to Adkins in his decision making. I'd rather have him as manager than your negative show of disproval.....
I believe Guly is far better in the centre than out wide hence comments from others saying yesterday he looked better.
I believe Guly is far better in the centre than out wide hence comments from others saying yesterday he looked better.
dadofmy3sons
says...
12:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Bluewhiteand red on the Echo site.
We all have handles, no one puts their real name up.
Not even you on either site.
Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies.
Same goes for Glory.
There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment.
Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage.
Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future.
Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you!
Support the Saints? I know I do !
We all have handles, no one puts their real name up.
Not even you on either site.
Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies.
Same goes for Glory.
There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment.
Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage.
Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future.
Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you!
Support the Saints? I know I do !
dadofmy3sons
says...
12:59pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More gloria.
How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right?
Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD?
Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision.
So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team.
GO AWAY SILLY PERSON!
Support the Saints.
Support football?
I know I do .
How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right?
Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD?
Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision.
So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team.
GO AWAY SILLY PERSON!
Support the Saints.
Support football?
I know I do .
circa 66 saint
says...
1:01pm Sun 9 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:agree, we will talk football with anyone who want's to even from the blue few, banter great but let's not get involved in the usual p1ssing match
Bluewhiteand red on the Echo site.
We all have handles, no one puts their real name up.
Not even you on either site.
Stop posting complete and total drivel and you may even get some reasonable replies.
Same goes for Glory.
There is no comparison between Saints and Pompey at the moment.
Saints are Prem 15th, solvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club with finances that we can manage.
Pompey are L1 20th, insolvent, looking to improve every aspect of the club but with no finance and no likelihood of it in the very near future.
Post some sensible comment just to catch me out, I dare you!
Support the Saints? I know I do !
toutlaw
says...
1:08pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Bungy53 wrote:yeah Adkins oops i'll just call him Nigel from now on. i have supported Saints all my life so i know that Guly scored some goals in the championship and league one but that doesn't mean he's good enough for the premier league does it? and we've given him chances already.
toutlaw wrote:When are you going to know the name of your own club's manager?
Great performance.
To those who are saying Guly was good, yes he was good today but i'm afraid he's had his chances and hasnt delivered, i know he has a great pass ratio but as a striker we really need assists and goals. Im not a guly hater but i don't understand what he's good at?
He's not a great finisher, doesn't have a good long shot, isn't quick and isn't particularly strong or skillful. He's not the future of the club
Also does Atkins have no faith in Mayuka or can he simply not fit him into the team, shame he never brings him on id like to see more of him
Shaw was brilliant and i think Fonte is really starting to look like premier league quality
The only T in the name belongs to Bring back Branfoot, and he/she is not worthy and isn't the Saints manager.
Moreover, if you had been a constant supporter since Guly was signed to Saints, you would know he as delivered on all the counts you suggested he hadn't.
He certainly hasn't looked impressive in previous games this season but has never deserved to be booed as soon as he arrived on the pitch.
Today, whilst on the pitch he did his bit and got very close to scoring.
Most of the posters who come on this forum and have spouted negative postings have either supported the blue few or are new posters this season. Some of these negative posters need to get a grip.
As I've said in the past, we're all just arm chair posters and therefore when it comes to team selection, it's common sense to trust the manager's choice of players since he is the one who sees what the players do, day in and day out,
Saints are moving in the right direction,slowly but surely. Keep supporting them and we can all do our bit. Slagging the team,the manager or individual players serves no positive purpose whatsoever.
COYS
im not someone who just accepts everything in blind faith to the club, i think we're doing really well but Guly isn't good enough thats all im saying!
wouldn't you like to see a bit more of Mayuka? we spent a decent amount of money on him just to have him on the bench
dadofmy3sons
says...
1:11pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Regarding Punch.
I was one of the posters who said that if he didn't want try with Saints then let him go.
I never disputed his talent, Pardew announced him as likely to be a future hero.
In my opinion, he merely wanted to play in the Prem and didn't really care who for.
I think he may well still be of that mindset, but he plays for us and as long as he is included in the first team he will stay and fight for his place.
He likes the fans singing his praises and he knows that we have welcomed him back.
I just hope no one says into his ear that he could do even better because he may well believe that person and seek greener pastures and I don't think there is any better for him than SFC.
The team nets together really well and he is given licence to play his way here. He has made a realy good partnership with Clyne and that is something that every team needs on both wings.
My personal opinion is that as a team we need to be able to switch him to the left wing as a winger just once in a while and see if we can catch out a defence with a run and cross from the byeline for Jayrod or Ricky to head in from a run to the middle.
Spurs did it in a Europa league game for 30 minutes and they were devastating, then they went back to opposite flanks and wide players cutting in on favoured feet and the supply to the middle stopped and they conceded.
Jose has said that we have the skills to mix it up with short and long. The ability to switch to a winger with Adam and Punch doing crosses for a period would confuse most teams.
Just my opinion of course, a football subject instead of maligning other posters and biting comments.
I was one of the posters who said that if he didn't want try with Saints then let him go.
I never disputed his talent, Pardew announced him as likely to be a future hero.
In my opinion, he merely wanted to play in the Prem and didn't really care who for.
I think he may well still be of that mindset, but he plays for us and as long as he is included in the first team he will stay and fight for his place.
He likes the fans singing his praises and he knows that we have welcomed him back.
I just hope no one says into his ear that he could do even better because he may well believe that person and seek greener pastures and I don't think there is any better for him than SFC.
The team nets together really well and he is given licence to play his way here. He has made a realy good partnership with Clyne and that is something that every team needs on both wings.
My personal opinion is that as a team we need to be able to switch him to the left wing as a winger just once in a while and see if we can catch out a defence with a run and cross from the byeline for Jayrod or Ricky to head in from a run to the middle.
Spurs did it in a Europa league game for 30 minutes and they were devastating, then they went back to opposite flanks and wide players cutting in on favoured feet and the supply to the middle stopped and they conceded.
Jose has said that we have the skills to mix it up with short and long. The ability to switch to a winger with Adam and Punch doing crosses for a period would confuse most teams.
Just my opinion of course, a football subject instead of maligning other posters and biting comments.
costa gaz
says...
1:15pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Yet another thread ruined by the usual suspects.
Some of you ought to reread some of your own comments, you'd realise what complete pericks you really are.
Seed have some time off mate...
Great result yesterday.
Some of you ought to reread some of your own comments, you'd realise what complete pericks you really are.
Seed have some time off mate...
Great result yesterday.
7saint7
says...
1:25pm Sun 9 Dec 12
For me since Luke shaw has came in to the first team for fox & Jack cork back in the team . It has made a huge impact on what was the worst defence in the prem .
The thing with Guly i don't blame fans for booing him as every time he comes on we drop points & it has made me question Adkins as a manager when he has been taking off players who are playing at there best off & bringing on Guly ....
When most people would bring off players who are not playing at there best & take them off & bring on some fresh legs..
Don't take what im saying the wrong way . I think Adkins is a good manager & should be be here till the end of season for sure . And i would never boo a saints player . even if it makes my hands go in to my face.
The thing with Guly i don't blame fans for booing him as every time he comes on we drop points & it has made me question Adkins as a manager when he has been taking off players who are playing at there best off & bringing on Guly ....
When most people would bring off players who are not playing at there best & take them off & bring on some fresh legs..
Don't take what im saying the wrong way . I think Adkins is a good manager & should be be here till the end of season for sure . And i would never boo a saints player . even if it makes my hands go in to my face.
More Glory
says...
1:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:Daddy-O
More gloria. How could you say that you thought the decision to disallow Punch headed goal was right? Did you not see the replays of the incident on MOTD? Frederici pushed Yoshida out of his way and he fell on to a Reading defender, if the defender hadn't been there he would have gone all the way down and a penalty would have been the correct decision. So if no one hadn't realised it before you have just proved beyond any reasonable doubt that you don't even watch football, let alone support a team. GO AWAY SILLY PERSON! Support the Saints. Support football? I know I do .
These decisions are made in a split second. If the ref sees a melee in the box, unless it is crystal clear, he will restart the game with the ball given to the defending side. Yes?
The Cork foul was very obviously and clearly a foul, no-one to impede the ref's decision, but you got lucky.
These things can even out over a season ie Shotton being sent off yesterday - what carp refereeing for that game. However with Man U conceding only 3 penalties in a decade recently, I do wonder what is going on with the top teams. see Italy
Until we get action replays - which amazingly Platini doesn't want - there will be inconsistency. Why doesn't Platini want action replays - anything to do with gambling I wonder?
I've watched my team for years, thanks - sillyboy
As I sad, the stripey's were the better team. Just chill out and enjoy it. Is there whiskey in the jar?
Support the Saints? I guess you are Saint Frankie. Well done for being somewhat sensible there, but here you have reverted to name calling.
Baddesley Bill
says...
1:50pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.)
I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory.
COYR
I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory.
COYR
Rising_Son
says...
1:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12
dadofmy3sons wrote:Uncooked meat? Take your pick, beef, horse, chicken or whale? Raw liver's just been banned.
Confucious wrote:Well then, why don't we just pop over there and give them a game there?
Ross123 wrote:Maybe something to do with Chelsea going to play in Japan in that world inter-continent club tournament?
anyone know why we havnt got a game next week when everyone else is playing?
looked at the fixtures for the next week and luckily all of our rivals have tough fixtures so hopefully not much movement next week in the table!
Yosh and Tad could pop indoors and see some mates and the lads could eat some uncooked meat, sushi.
We used to feed Terry Hurlock on raw meat!
TEBOURBA
says...
2:43pm Sun 9 Dec 12
1 - 0 is a good result and a good lift up the table.
How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad?
Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m.
If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL.
With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!!
How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad?
Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m.
If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL.
With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!!
LJSaint
says...
3:02pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Great result today and great team performance. Don't like the Boo'ers for Guly. I am the first person to criticise him normally but in a short time on the pitch he was a man intent on proving himself and played really well. You don't boo your own team EVER! Punch and Shaw were brilliant, felt great having Davis in goal- reliable, steady hands, organiser. Great team performance. Now all you Adkins haters from 6 weeks or so ago EAT YOUR WORDS!!!!!
More Glory
says...
3:09pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill et al,
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.
I now understand the whole thing a lot more.
One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.
If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.
Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.
This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.
To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.
Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.
Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,
So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.
When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.
I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.
Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy
Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.
I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.
What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.
What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.
There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?
I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.
Gooday to you
Big must win game v Sunderland
bluewhiteandred
says...
3:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12
To the other bluewhiteandred on pompey news site im here ! ****
apparently i have been told by ? now that would be telling your a tasty sexy lady Saints supporter who has a university litracy degree
you said you would leave me alone if i didnt come on here xxx
I wish you would tell me you true log in name i want to send you a xxxxmas card
apparently i have been told by ? now that would be telling your a tasty sexy lady Saints supporter who has a university litracy degree
you said you would leave me alone if i didnt come on here xxx
I wish you would tell me you true log in name i want to send you a xxxxmas card
mack chinnon
says...
3:28pm Sun 9 Dec 12
E I E I E I O,
up the premier league we go
and when we get to 15th
this is what we sing
we,re Southampton
we,re Southampton
Nigel is our king
up the premier league we go
and when we get to 15th
this is what we sing
we,re Southampton
we,re Southampton
Nigel is our king
slugger
says...
3:35pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill et al,
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.
I now understand the whole thing a lot more.
One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.
If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.
Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.
This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.
To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.
Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.
Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,
So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.
When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.
I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.
Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy
Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.
I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.
What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.
What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.
There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?
I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.
Gooday to you
Big must win game v Sunderland
circa 66 saint
says...
3:52pm Sun 9 Dec 12
more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well,
any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter.
THERE HATCHET BURIED
COYR
any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter.
THERE HATCHET BURIED
COYR
franiow
says...
4:06pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Not on here much for obvious reasons as you have to scroll through so much to find the real thread. Enjoyed the match yesterday, though wish we would put the chances away. Looked back to ourselves (possibly because of opposition, but mainly because confidence is back. Luke Shaw looks brilliant and so young (Buttner anyone). Pucheon is like a new player, but everyone played well. Good to see SKD back...wouldn't want his career here to finish on a low point. Nigel values Guly for his height and as a utility man...always does his best.. all managers like players they can trust. Onwards and upwards.
More Glory
says...
4:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.
More Glory wrote:sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYRBill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?
Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
More Glory
says...
4:16pm Sun 9 Dec 12
circa 66 saint wrote:Cool.
more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR
I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
Fatty x Ford Worker
says...
4:20pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.
Baddesley Bill
says...
4:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates?
...just like the famous game from WW1
...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.
...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
...just like the famous game from WW1
...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.
...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
slugger
says...
4:35pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .
slugger wrote:Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.
More Glory wrote:sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYRBill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?
Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
saint,
says...
4:53pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:I have been reading these posts and very rarely commenting for about 5 or 6 years and it is a joke on here now. I left the UK for France with my family nearly 5 years ago and I have really enjoyed reading the stories on the saints and all the comments from everyone (I am a happy clapper by the way, as are my two boys!!). I can't let them read the rubbish that has been written on here the last few months though and that is a shame as they sit around the laptop with me on match days and never miss a minute whether it was listening on the player or the luxury of watching every game this season. They are saints mad as I have been taking them to St Mary's since they were 2 and 3!!
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill et al,
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.
I now understand the whole thing a lot more.
One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.
If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.
Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.
This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.
To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.
Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.
Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,
So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.
When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.
I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.
Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy
Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.
I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.
What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.
What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.
There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?
I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.
Gooday to you
Big must win game v Sunderland
So if any of you must go on the news site remember light hearted footy banter only, please remember our dark days and how it felt when it looked like it was all over. COYR
Force14
says...
4:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:You bore everyone what ever site you are on.
More Glory wrote:i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .
slugger wrote:Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.
More Glory wrote:sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYRBill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?
Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
slugger
says...
4:59pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Force14 wrote:that helps doesn't it ! ....... i suggest that this one is just a pure and simple wum who wouldn't know a football if it smacked him (or her) in the face .
slugger wrote:You bore everyone what ever site you are on.
More Glory wrote:i swear , the only time i changed my name on the news site was when somebody pretended to be the slugger ...... i'm always up front , you have my word .
slugger wrote:Bill et al does actually mean Bill and others Slugger, so you're not butting in.
More Glory wrote:sorry to butt in but you make some fair points , i promise not to make inane comments on the news site (there is really only one me) , i will however make comments if i deem them to be valid , as far as i'm concerned any true football fan is welcome to make valid comments on here .......... peace man .Baddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYRBill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
So, you have never had another NS poster? Blue turned Red?
Make valid points by all means, I will do the same.
Invidia
says...
5:00pm Sun 9 Dec 12
franiow wrote:Fran, my exact sentiments, I well remember on here when fans were hollering for a left back before the Buttner deal was broken up that we already had a very good left back, I believe with the Jack Cork return plus Luke Shaw the Saints defence has looked pretty solid, we won't win every game but the teams we lose to will know they had to work hard to win.
Not on here much for obvious reasons as you have to scroll through so much to find the real thread. Enjoyed the match yesterday, though wish we would put the chances away. Looked back to ourselves (possibly because of opposition, but mainly because confidence is back. Luke Shaw looks brilliant and so young (Buttner anyone). Pucheon is like a new player, but everyone played well. Good to see SKD back...wouldn't want his career here to finish on a low point. Nigel values Guly for his height and as a utility man...always does his best.. all managers like players they can trust. Onwards and upwards.
Force14
says...
5:01pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.
Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates?
...just like the famous game from WW1
...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.
...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
OSPREYSAINT
says...
5:02pm Sun 9 Dec 12
TEBOURBA wrote:Go forth and multiply.
1 - 0 is a good result and a good lift up the table.
How will the enforced two week break running in to 4 vital games in 10 days affect Saints ---- for good or bad?
Nigel is slowly bringing things together but like others, I think JR and Gaston are a waste of £19m.
If Saints can get at least 5 or 6 points from the next 4 games and then buy and sell wisely in the January sales, Saints should be able to secure their place in the PL.
With a new Communications Director,NC paying his bills on time, Staplewood coming together --- the future's bright ---the future's orange!!
OSPREYSAINT
says...
5:02pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Force14 wrote:Try sex and travel.
Baddesley Bill wrote:11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.
Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates?
...just like the famous game from WW1
...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen.
...bagsy I go in goal! :O)
JohnItaly
says...
5:03pm Sun 9 Dec 12
With transfer window only a couple of weeks away speculation will soon be aired as to coming and goings. As a starter what about Lee & Mayuka departing. Lee seems to have disappeared all together with Mayuka doing nothing but warming the bench. Also cannot see Boruc hanging around making room for a thoroughly experinced keeper to come in.
puppy saint
says...
5:03pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:Anti-freeze Martini?
Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.
Invidia
says...
5:07pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
circa 66 saint
says...
5:08pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet
circa 66 saint wrote:Cool.
more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYR
I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
now good posting
Force14
says...
5:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Invidia wrote:why are you reading it then thicko ?
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
More Glory
says...
5:13pm Sun 9 Dec 12
OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play.
I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27?
However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this.
Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie
http://www.newsmedia
news.com/milligan.sh
tml
The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27?
However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this.
Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie
http://www.newsmedia
news.com/milligan.sh
tml
The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
slugger
says...
5:13pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Invidia wrote:i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
More Glory
says...
5:19pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Force14 wrote:That is a fair point Force, Maybe you have to be a Pompey fan to understand how funny that is. At least we would have a good chance of winning.
Baddesley Bill wrote: Just a silly thought here...but what about a Xmas football match. Echo v News, Scummers v skates? ...just like the famous game from WW1 ...perhaps if a UN peace keeping force were on hand we could actually make it happen. ...bagsy I go in goal! :O)11 Pompey fans against one Stain and 10 laptops, could be a laugh.
slugger
says...
5:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play.
I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27?
However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this.
Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie
http://www.newsmedia
news.com/milligan.sh
tml
The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.
Invidia
says...
5:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"
Invidia wrote:i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
ShakeyWiffles
says...
5:23pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Bring back Branfoot wrote:Actually Mr Pedantic. I know Bill, Slugger AND Seed. I can confirm they are different people but hey. You won't believe me, you'll just wrongly assume I'm another of their identities. They also do not come off second best to you. A lot of your opinions are bizarre and when trying to argue and act the keyboard warrior you come off as nothing more than a petulant little child. Bit of advice for you? Know when to sit down and shut up. You're fighting a losing battle and making yourself look like all the things you call them.
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill, I've been coming on here a month and you're still to say something amusing. This is a major part of your life, you have created your other usernames, yet individuals like me can come on here and make you look an utter fool, at will. Lol. You need six or seven other wives to support you, or you run off! Lol
Oops...somebody's lost the plot online.
Skunt :0)
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
5:24pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Perhaps the frustration comes from people accusing you of something you're not guilty of.
I've have one login here and one on The News, both are similar and identify me. I am not The Realist nor several other names I've been accused of and not even seen their posts! I always supported PST on The News and think they should get right behind it, frankly their aren't any other choices in town.
Also I have no problem with different opinions, but I do have a problem with style. If someone says:
I think Nigel is struggling and maybe out of his depth.
That's a valid opinion, whereas:
Tango head hasn't got a clue and has installed sunbeds at SMS
Clearly isn't!
I've have one login here and one on The News, both are similar and identify me. I am not The Realist nor several other names I've been accused of and not even seen their posts! I always supported PST on The News and think they should get right behind it, frankly their aren't any other choices in town.
Also I have no problem with different opinions, but I do have a problem with style. If someone says:
I think Nigel is struggling and maybe out of his depth.
That's a valid opinion, whereas:
Tango head hasn't got a clue and has installed sunbeds at SMS
Clearly isn't!
slugger
says...
5:30pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Invidia wrote:oh i understand alright , perhaps you could acknowledge that moves are afoot to address the poinltess tit for tat "banter" ....... that's a positive step no ?
slugger wrote:"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"
Invidia wrote:i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
More Glory
says...
5:31pm Sun 9 Dec 12
saint, wrote:Saint. What happened on our site, is that it went open season, and then the Mods just really clamped down. I was surprised when I first came here, at what could be said on here, then it just washes over you, The thread yesterday was not family entertainment for sure.
More Glory wrote:I have been reading these posts and very rarely commenting for about 5 or 6 years and it is a joke on here now. I left the UK for France with my family nearly 5 years ago and I have really enjoyed reading the stories on the saints and all the comments from everyone (I am a happy clapper by the way, as are my two boys!!). I can't let them read the rubbish that has been written on here the last few months though and that is a shame as they sit around the laptop with me on match days and never miss a minute whether it was listening on the player or the luxury of watching every game this season. They are saints mad as I have been taking them to St Mary's since they were 2 and 3!! So if any of you must go on the news site remember light hearted footy banter only, please remember our dark days and how it felt when it looked like it was all over. COYRBaddesley Bill wrote: Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYRBill et al, I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before. I now understand the whole thing a lot more. One thing that is blindingly obvious , is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable. If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here. Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so. This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here. To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site. Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod. Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit, So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS. When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time. I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect. Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration. I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you. What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters. What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale. There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be? I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here. Gooday to you Big must win game v Sunderland
slugger
says...
5:33pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:just re-read ...... apologies invidia , thought it was aimed at me ....... doh !
Invidia wrote:oh i understand alright , perhaps you could acknowledge that moves are afoot to address the poinltess tit for tat "banter" ....... that's a positive step no ?
slugger wrote:"Intelligent banter" that would be a first on this site as for force 14 you can see things written without reading it, or is that too profound for you to understand "nobed"
Invidia wrote:i would suggest that you do and they do ......... anyway , i'm all for intelligent banter .
Quite frankly, you supposed football fans do you believe for one minute that genuine fans give a toss whether you kiss and make up nobody but yourselves read your diatribe anyway.
More Glory
says...
5:34pm Sun 9 Dec 12
circa 66 saint wrote:If I was a mind reader, do you think Mystic Mg would be a good name?
More Glory wrote:proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good postingcirca 66 saint wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYRCool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
slugger
says...
5:40pm Sun 9 Dec 12
mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
Fatty x Ford Worker
says...
5:42pm Sun 9 Dec 12
puppy saint wrote:Oh course dont upset Percy He likes it shaken but not stirred!
Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:Anti-freeze Martini?
Bill and Ben the flower pot men! Oh when the Saints go marching in.
More Glory
says...
5:46pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician
It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.
He sounds OK to me
Fatty x Ford Worker
says...
5:48pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Has that old Bag got new wheels yet on our Fish Finger Site.Sorry Crab Sticks HA.HA!
slugger
says...
5:51pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:it does sound odd , it would appear that unearthing the truth can be a risky business .
slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician
It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.
He sounds OK to me
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
5:53pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset.
slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician
It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.
He sounds OK to me
The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
More Glory
says...
5:54pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:No.
mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
st1halo
says...
5:56pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:I don't know what goes on at the NS site, Gloria, I have had a look but as they say, two wrongs don't make a right.
Baddesley Bill wrote:Bill et al,
Re disruption to threads: Fair to say that both Echo and News sites have suffered from t1t for tat comments designed to simply wind others up. I'm happy to give it a rest. (A little harmless banter can liven up a thread when it is dead and finished however.) I'm willing to give it a go if you are More Glory. COYR
I have only been here for up to 2 months. I also had never been on before.
I now understand the whole thing a lot more.
One thing that is blindingly obvious
, is that people from this site (ES) going on the News Site (NS) is generally acceptable.
If I said on the NS that I was going, or had just been onto the ES, lots of posters (not all) would slag me off. This is the reason why you don't find Pompey fans using the same name here.
Also, a lot of you guys are stating that this site is now a joke. Great, you now understand what the NS site has been like for 2 1/2 years or so.
This period has coincided with the lowest ebb in our club's history. I guess you can imagine then why some Pompey fans are now on here.
To the genuine fans here, sorry but as I have said before, you need to moderate your own and not condone the awayday WUM's on our site.
Witness Seed the other day, attacking a normal poster for mentioning that some fans were like "Stepford wives". He also called one of your own posters acunt when I first came on here. I was actually surprised at that, but it went by without comment. On the NS, a similar poster would be withdrawn by the Mod.
Say what you like about the NS - but we don't have people who dominate the site. We do have more posters who are up fo a bundle - I admit,
So, your own WUM's have brought back loads of Pompey posters here. Then you orchestrate a Shushh campaign, I wonder who started that? Again all the normal posters just go along with it. You just would not get this pack mentality on the NS.
When I first came on - I posted some drivel poems. This was in response to Seed who had being doing the same for months. I did it for 3 days. There was a point and I made it at the time.
I also got attacked by village Bob who was just anal to be honest with you. I have taken the pee out of Bob ever since, with the wider agenda being that this is generally the mode of attack by Red WUM's on the NS. He has since cleared up his act and his grammar - respect.
Circa 66. The same. A massive onslaught. Bygones be bygones if you fancy it? Yes Bobby played in the top league, I also told you I met him, and he was a nice guy
Indeed I do like banter. but when the Red WUM's try to disrupt us from buying the club, that is warfare, and my feeling is that the Blues who are on here feel the same. Please don't deny this is happening - just be honest! It's not just one poster, and it has been for a duration.
I can be reasonable, but you need to stop the condoning behaviour on this site. When people say they haven't been on our site for months, and we know they have under different logons, we have to tell you.
What I also find difficult to understand, is that the multi logons are just so obvious, we have told you generally who they are (with a few mistakes), but again - nothing is stated by the normal posters.
What I do like about this site, is that you can discuss quite bizarre things on here. The NS doesn't do bizarre to the same scale.
There are also a lot of cool posters on here. Why wouldn't there be?
I don't mind a truce of sensibleness, but could your WUM's stick to it. As I say, we have loads more than you do here.
Gooday to you
Big must win game v Sunderland
I don't mind the p1ss taking and banter like "you're trophy cabinet doubles up as a broom cupboard" from your guys, stuff like that, it's entertaining and comparing history,you can be as taunting and baiting as you like but inane name calling is pointless and degenerates quickly into childish posts which consume the thread and aren't even funny.
I suggest you try and keep it impersonal. I do.
Even some Saints fans call other Saints fans skates when they disagree which is not called for really, gotta respect others opinions even if you disagree.
STID
Invidia
says...
5:58pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Stephen Milligan played for Carlisle some years back but never made it big
More Glory
says...
6:09pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest".
More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.
slugger
says...
6:10pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .
slugger wrote:No.
mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?
puppy saint
says...
6:14pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:Windolene Mojito?
Has that old Bag got new wheels yet on our Fish Finger Site.Sorry Crab Sticks HA.HA!
circa 66 saint
says...
6:18pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:i see west hoof and fat sam are coming into a fixture line up simular to our start of the season, by the new year will they be below us and down in the mix, their easy start will prove to be as misleading as saints start, just proves no matter what position you are during the season it's where you are at the end that counts C O Y R
circa 66 saint wrote:If I was a mind reader, do you think Mystic Mg would be a good name?
More Glory wrote:proves 1 thing m g you can't read minds else you would have complained where i buried the hatchet now good postingcirca 66 saint wrote: more glory just read your post not much to complain about, always willing to talk football but as soon as it becomes a my d1ck is bigger than yours contest then forget it because it's all been said and at the end no one comes out of it well, any new fact's views or opinions welcome whether anybody responds is another matter. THERE HATCHET BURIED COYRCool. I will now refer to my proper legal name - Jake the Leg (just kidding).
Invidia
says...
6:18pm Sun 9 Dec 12
I thought the connection with football was that his uncle spike from Sholing used to go to the "Old Dell" as a Saints fan
Strasbourg Saint
says...
6:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all.
More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset.
slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician
It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.
He sounds OK to me
The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes.
I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke.
Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties .....
When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious.
MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice.
Peace and love!
More Glory
says...
6:31pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
6:31pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:Caps? It comes in a bottle. There was also the strange circumstances of Godfrey Olsens son being found dead. In a bath in a Paris hotel I think, but my memory isn't great. Nitrate does that...
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest".
More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.
Strasbourg Saint
says...
6:38pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Strasbourg Saint wrote:Sorry, I'm getting my tory babes muddled up, I don't mean Spelman, of course, but the former Telegraph journo, Julie Kirkbride. Frankly, one tory babe looks and sounds just like the next one to me :o)
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all.
More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset.
slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan.
More Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician
It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour.
He sounds OK to me
The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.
Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes.
I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke.
Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties .....
When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious.
MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice.
Peace and love!
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
6:45pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site.
slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here.
I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
More Glory
says...
6:47pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie,
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.
It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.
The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
Invidia
says...
6:52pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
slugger
says...
6:52pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:can't argue with that eh mr glory ?
More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site.
slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here.
I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
Baddesley Bill
says...
6:55pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)
More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site.
slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.
More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here.
I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.
st1halo
says...
6:58pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though.
Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie,
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.
It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.
The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana!
More Glory
says...
7:01pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:http://www.drugs.com
More Glory wrote:Caps? It comes in a bottle. There was also the strange circumstances of Godfrey Olsens son being found dead. In a bath in a Paris hotel I think, but my memory isn't great. Nitrate does that...Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:"no actual traces of any amyl nitrate caps were ever reported as found at the scene. Despite being a central plank to the official government-released statements on the circumstances of the MPs death, and the resuling innuendo, no evidence to back up the allegations of amyl nitrate was ever produced and the matter received but minor attention during the inquest". Like I say there is a big football connection to this story, about the footballer wanting to publicise his exploits with a paper, other MP's trying to stop it, and Milligan perhaps trying to push the story through.More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
/cons/amyl-nitrite-i
nhalation-oral-nebul
ization.html
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
7:05pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him?
Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie,
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.
It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.
The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
slugger
says...
7:08pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:woahhh ! ......... i said nothing m'lud .
More Glory wrote:I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him?
Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie,
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.
It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.
The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
More Glory
says...
7:11pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Invidia wrote:Really? It is a footy story with a connection to your town, As per usual a bloke who is asking questions and trying to get to the bottom of things is sidelined, and make to look a wierdo / in this case perverted. If this was one of your relatives or friends you would be concerned surely. OK you are not interested, but others will be, and as I say I was just after information on what he was like as a bloke, as I was given some info years ago which is now making sense.
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
As I said above, this site is more rangier than the News. Why not?
angus mc coatup
says...
7:12pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Invidia wrote:it's just a game, to pull the thread away from the point of discussion.unfortuna
More glory, your point of posting all that history on here "is"
tley after consuming a rather large amount of alcohol last night I fell for It,with that obnoxious egotistical BBB.I apologise for posting a load of stupid stuff and will now revert back to sssshhhhhing !
well we don't keep many clean sheets
so the beer was flowing copiously.
(not much of an excuse I know)
hedge end bob
says...
7:14pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More glory , i think it might have been something you posted about our manager, i e name calling, that got a reaction from me. I cant remember attacking you first. Honest question, did you ever post under different names when having a dig at me??. The style of insults were much the same from three different posters.
As you say today i am just not interested what happens to your club or what your club supporters post on this site. I now put it down to ignorence and bad manners and simply ignore.
If you want to talk football without insults that's fine, i do with other clubs fans with no trouble.
As you say today i am just not interested what happens to your club or what your club supporters post on this site. I now put it down to ignorence and bad manners and simply ignore.
If you want to talk football without insults that's fine, i do with other clubs fans with no trouble.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
7:15pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:Similar circumstances to George Michael.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:woahhh ! ......... i said nothing m'lud .
More Glory wrote:I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him?
Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie,
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police.
It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there.
The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.
I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.
The trouble is the public want squeaky clean politicians who are normal family people. However, normal family people wouldn't stand to be an MP. Therefore they have to lie.
More Glory
says...
7:15pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:Velleity?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
More Glory
says...
7:20pm Sun 9 Dec 12
st1halo wrote:Club Tropicana, drinks are free,
More Glory wrote:I've heard the orange recovered from the ordeal though. To avoid shame it moved to California and now goes uner the name of Tropicana!Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
Fun and sunshine - there's enough for everyone.
All that's missing is the sea,
But don't worry, you can suntan!
So George was there.
slugger
says...
7:22pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ?
Baddesley Bill wrote:Velleity?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
Seedhouse the Unrepentant
says...
7:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12
slugger wrote:We did. And I coached V Jnr to beat his old man at pool! A nice dad and son. I was invited late into a box this weekend otherwise I would have taken Seed the Small and met up again.
More Glory wrote:mr glory , you are deffo a tad paranoid , baddesley bill (my brother) and seedhouse (good friend) met velleity and his son after our match with newcastle ........ what is odd about that ?
Baddesley Bill wrote:Velleity?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
Baddesley Bill
says...
7:27pm Sun 9 Dec 12
More Glory wrote:I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)
Baddesley Bill wrote:Velleity?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
Baddesley Bill
says...
7:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Baddesley Bill wrote:...he is however...nowhere near as good looking! :O)
More Glory wrote:I can confirm Velliety is his own person...and somewhat thinner and taller than me....and that's a FACT! :O)
Baddesley Bill wrote:Velleity?
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:To be fair...I have only ever posted as me because I really can't be @rsed to create another login...but it has kept me accountable for every comment I've ever made...which is good....I think ;0)More Glory wrote:The annoying thing is that that is exactly what I was saying on your site. I admit I first joined to take the mick, as Seedhouse, then got banned so re logged on as Sister Humping Skate - yes I know - but i changed that after about three days to Return of the Seed. That is the only login I have had since and I never had more than one at a time. Nor on here. I would argue, whether you like our posts or not, that there is an honesty to Bill, Slugger and me in that we don't pretend to be someone else. Yet you have accused us of having mulitple logins a million times.slugger wrote:As far as I understand it, you Bill n Seed are the only ones on either site with the same names. My anonymity means I get to make and continue to make serious points about my club to others at a time when it is has been struggling. Loads of fans needed persuading on our site about a great many things from BC being a crook, to the fact that he probably hasnt paid a bean for the club save one months wages, through to the PST being the best option.More Glory wrote:who then ? ...... transparency is cool .slugger wrote: mr glory , who are you on the news site ......... pfcbutton ?No.
More Glory
says...
7:29pm Sun 9 Dec 12
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:I'm saying that SM wasn't part of the establishment. MP is, and was going to be exposed with another for his deviancy.
More Glory wrote:I'm not sure what point you are making? Are you saying someone was there involved in sex games which went wrong and was told to scarper or are you saying he murdered him? I used to shag the PA of the Party Leader (did her in his office once) and she told me a number of stories the police had brought to her bosses attention. All were of a sexual nature but not of criminal activity. That is why Portillo didn't become leader.Strasbourg Saint wrote:Strassie, Like I say, I was told years ago about a certain MP being there at his death, and being told to clear off by the Police. It was only until recently with all the Saville stuff coming out, people are now starting to ask more questions about Politicians, and with a tiny bit of googling, the story is there. The website shown is just one, just google his name, the footballer, and you will find the others names easily. Like I say it all slotted into place with what I had been told. My source wasn't a taxi driver BTW, it was a relative of the Policeman.Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:Evening all. Not sure whether to join in with this, but here goes. I met Stephen a couple of times in work-related matters. While I'm no tory (I'm not a party person of any colour), I found him to be a decent bloke. Re his sexuality, I only know that he was linked for a time with Caroline Spelman and I was told it may have ended because. well, he may have been more attracted to guys. The only certainty seems to be that there were certain uncertainties ..... When I heard about his death - and the 'official' accounts that it was an accidetally self-influicted death caused by a solo sexual act involving autoasphyxiation - I was both saddened and suspicious. MG, I had never heard of this website, nor of the Fashanu link and I don't have any 'inside info' but I have remained suspicious to this day. So, if the truth ever came out, and if that truth showed Stephen in a better light than history currently remembers him, then it would IMO be a good day for justice. Peace and love!More Glory wrote:When I was first active in the Tory party was when he died. I never met him but people I worked with were friends of his. They were deeply upset. The rumours were self suffocation involving tights around the neck, amol nitrate and an orange.slugger wrote:Yep, most of them are jokers, which is why I am interested in inside information on Milligan. A cut n paste from the website quoted. ie he may not a normal greasy politician It was reported shortly before his death that he had started work on a controversial book about the Royal Family. The text of the book has never been released, and there were various discrepancies and strange events connected to his death that were reported at the time but have never been fully explained - such as journalists being followed to his house by unmarked cars. He was infamous for writing letters to newspapers which poured scorn on the Official Secrets Act; his books, such as The Intelligence Game, cast doubt on the official version of events. Just before his death, he unearthed Britain's code-cracking secrets, in particular the story that the British had cracked Japanese naval codes in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbour. He sounds OK to meMore Glory wrote: OK. Here is a serious footy discussion which involves your town, Its to do with "action" off the field of play. I mentioned Stephen Milligan yesterday, and certain rumours. No-one bit. Maybe your town is slightly embarrased by the whole thing, but it looks like he was made to look a bit fruity, and may have been bumped. This guy was Known to speak his mind, and had loads of girlfriends. Any inside information from your end of the M27? However, as I said yesterday (might have been the day before), I was given definitive information via a friend from a very senior policeman which was that senior MP's were present at his house at the time of his death. The recent rumours, and stories are somewhat confirming this. Loads of stories on it. Loads. ie http://www.newsmedia news.com/milligan.sh tml The footy connection is the death of Justin Fashanu.to be fair , there isn't a person in politics that i trust so i tend to switch off when it's mentioned .
SM may have been asked to intervene, but there was also a bigger picture going on with his book, and other stuff. The required intervention may have been the establishment asking him to back off, and toe the line, He obviously didn't, which is why I was after some background info on him.
Politicians are controlled via their deviancy. It's how it has always been.
Tye-Dye pt2 says...
5:49pm Sat 8 Dec 12
14.12.12 WTFILN!!!