When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
10:50am Monday 27th October 2008 in
Jan Poortvliet is hoping the next Saints transfers will be players coming in rather than going out after the massive disappointment of Stern John’s departure last week.
Following an angry reaction to the move by fans, the Saints head coach admitted he wanted John to stay and that the striker did not want to leave.
But, with Poortvliet not able to guarantee the striker would play every week, a financial decision was taken by the club’s hierarchy to let the Trinidad & Tobago international move to Bristol City on loan until January.
Saints looked desperately short of firepower in their 3-0 defeat to Swansea and a vocal section of the 1,000-strong away support made their feelings clear.
They chanted John’s name and ‘we want Rupert out,’ as they blame Rupert Lowe for the striker’s departure.
When asked directly why John left against his and the Poortvliet's wishes, the head coach said: “The actual reason you all know. We talked at the beginning of the season of the wage bill and that’s still a problem."
Comments(57)
Kdog
says...
7:07am Mon 27 Oct 08
UTS
says...
8:21am Mon 27 Oct 08
sainthog7
says...
8:42am Mon 27 Oct 08
JimmyLondon
says...
8:50am Mon 27 Oct 08
Lehman Bros Banker
says...
9:51am Mon 27 Oct 08
Saint
says...
10:20am Mon 27 Oct 08
Shoong
says...
10:28am Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite
says...
10:51am Mon 27 Oct 08
RF
says...
10:55am Mon 27 Oct 08
UTS
says...
10:59am Mon 27 Oct 08
RF
says...
11:13am Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite wrote:Who was the top Goal scorer at the club last season? Failing career you say...19 goals in 40 games for saints, that's no failure. Career Total App 367 Goals 144 - that look like a failure to you? who scored two of the goals in the last game of last season to keep us up? yes, your failure...
Come on you Saints fans: What did John do for us at Sheff. Utd. -NOTHING. What did he do before we gave him a second chance to revive a failing career - NOTHING. Why pay him appearance money when he is never going to give us a return. Since the start of the year, who has left us and made good elsewhere - NOBODY. Why because the players brought into the club during the time Rupert was not in charge, was wasted money. We have a team of young players, yes the will lose games, but the will win games too and I believe we wil stay in the CCC this year. By the way before anyone asks, I be a supporter for 65years. I seen the good and the bad times over the years and believe me these are NOT the really bad years I've seen.
AndyAndrews
says...
11:14am Mon 27 Oct 08
Weston Saint
says...
11:30am Mon 27 Oct 08
Court Jester Crew
says...
11:34am Mon 27 Oct 08
Redhat
says...
11:38am Mon 27 Oct 08
ejjackson
says...
11:40am Mon 27 Oct 08
Sara - Netley Abbey
says...
12:01pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Saint
says...
12:39pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Weston Saint wrote:Exactly!
I have never been and out and out opposer of Rupert Lowe. I could see we were in the mire and his way seemed the only real answer to our financial problems particularly as we have a respected Andrew Cowen in there hopefully fighting for reality. However I have recently fallen off the fence having heard little bits from many and varied respected people with one thing in common, they all are firm supporters of Southampton Football Club. My gut feeling is that Lowe has won. There is nothing we can do. Under his stewardship Southampton FC is dying a horrible death. OK it might have happened under the previous regime, who knows. I hear (second hand I might add) even some of our young players are getting disillusioned although that may be as much down to the team inability as a unit. I am going again tomorrow evening but there is no buzz, no desire, just a numbness and realisation that I am watching the death throws of a once proud football club. I can understand the stay aways. It is not helping our financial position but it has to send an important message to Lowe and his backers. Hand over the Stewardship to someone else. Lowe himself will never give in to his ideals. Wilde has to see his damaging role in this. He needs to set the domino's falling. Resignation from the plc is the only way in my opinion. Do it please and do it soon or the little value you have left in your shareholdings will soon be worthless.
The Exiled Saint
says...
12:44pm Mon 27 Oct 08
crusti
says...
12:49pm Mon 27 Oct 08
TC1
says...
12:57pm Mon 27 Oct 08
ejjackson wrote:You hit the nail on the head there! Thats the best post i've read on here for ages....unfortunatel
Many will cynically laugh at this piece and im sure that it will be pulled apart on various message boards, but for those that sit back and say "But what can fans do" they would do well to google the name Angie Rowe, ten years ago she stepped up to a microphone in front of 150 fellow supporters of her team and made a passioned plea, their club occupied 92nd place in the league, its debts were horrendous and it didnt even own its own stadium, being charged an exhorbitant rent by a previous owner of the club. In her speech she said " We dont want pitch invasions, poster campaigns, hate mail anything like that, but there comes a point when you cant carry on saying I cant do anything about it , No, We can all do something if we try. On that evening the Tigers Co-Operative Trust was formed, that Club was Hull City and they are the living embodiment of what supporters can do if they unite. Or perhaps we can just all sit back and do nothing YOU DONT HAVE TO BE A SUPPORTER OF LOWE TO BE A SUPPORTER OF SAINTS... OBVIOUSLY SOME PEOPLE ARE WEAK...
Saints4Eva
says...
12:58pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite
says...
1:01pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Saint
says...
1:26pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite wrote:What a load of crap you write!
Lets have some truth on this web-site, its not Rupert/Wilde thats stopping the Saints going forward,its the fickle whinging Saints fans. Pompey have had their troubles over the years and had years of relegation, also Deacon as Chairman. What did they do, they had 2/4000 away fans at matches that supported the team even when they were losing heavily and at home matches they sung until the final whistle. What happened a Millionaire bought the club,the rest is history. Why did Madric buy Pompey and not the Saints, because he could see a team with supporters and not a team with whingers for fans. If you all want to get rid of Lowe/Wilde pack the home games and support the team at away games, win or lose. Norwich was relegated at the same time as the Saints, what have their supporters done, they have bought every season ticket available, 23000, where are they in the league just above us, but they still turn up for every match. A buyer will see the support the Saints would have and put his money into the club. But any invester reading this web-site, would certain agree that you do not deserve a Premiership team. Over the 65yrs I have supported the Saints, we have had good and bad times, the team needs support in the bad teams, not a lot of stay at home and whingers. Quite honestly the whole club, team, crowd etc. would be better off if you all S** off to another club and stop your continual anti-Saints remarks on this site.
St Retford
says...
1:37pm Mon 27 Oct 08
saint_or_sinner
says...
2:01pm Mon 27 Oct 08
ejjackson
says...
2:08pm Mon 27 Oct 08
miltonarchers
says...
3:11pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite
says...
3:17pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Egomaniac
says...
3:44pm Mon 27 Oct 08
saint_or_sinner
says...
4:04pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Saint
says...
4:15pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite wrote:Sorry you'r just playing with words, and in the prem we had nearly a full house for most of the season. To use Norwich as a example, is possibly better example if you look at what the board there are doing, and that they are indeed trying to get back to the prem every season. The board give the fans a reason to buy their season tickets, and there in my lie the answer. The bussiness we are in is the entertainment and results bussiness, get either right fans will turn up.
saint_or_sinner, you say nobody slagging off the club, only the way it is run. Fact I have read every annual financial statement of the PLc, NOWHERE, in those accounts shows Rupert Lowe 'milking' the club. This was put around for the fault of relegation. However,when we were in the Premiership how many times did we have a complete sell out per season. Did we at any time sell all the season tickets. So how come you are deducting 12000 from 30000. If the Saints lose 2 or 3 matches 5000 stay away, if we win a couple of matches the crowd increases 5000, are these fans 'glory hunters'. Certainly times are bad, but if I can visit the home games from Norfolk(nearly 475miles trip) I'm certain people living in Soton area can make the effort. As I have said before Norwich have sold every season ticket each year since their relegation. They were one place below us in the league, but they went out and brought in a Reading striker on loan who has scored four goals in three matches. We cannot do this because the Saints fickle fans think they are doing something positive by staying away.So we lose revenue to pay wages. Saint, writes that it is rubbish about pompey, but they were voted best fans 2/3 years running. He also writes that the club has had the heart ripped out by the Board. If there is not enough money coming in,(fans on seats), you cannot pay money out. Nobody is asking you to keep quite, in fact I'm asking all of you to get down to the SMS and shout your heads off in support of these young players trying their best for you.
robhythe
says...
4:18pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Barcelona Saint
says...
4:33pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Andy Locks Heath
says...
4:39pm Mon 27 Oct 08
robhythe
says...
4:48pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Andy Locks Heath wrote:Good post ! What do you think will happen if nothing changes then??? I dont have any experience in corperate govenance etc i know but cant you see this is a GAMBLE with a young team which may send them down, not good business!
Why doesn't everyone just stick to football and leave the business, finance and politics out of it because most of you clearly don't have a clue what you are talking about anyway, and obviously don't have any experience of corporate governance either. None of us knows what goes on inside the club, not the dynamics, the relationships, the thinking or the imperatives, yet every time some idiot here or in the Ugly Inside makes some speculative comment blaming Lowe, everyone else takes it on board as though it is common knowledge! So now this completely invented picture is created about how the club is run and you are all talking as though it is absolutely true! So come on then, produce some proof. How can Lowe be "lining his pockets"? - this is a PLC! Haven;t you even figured that out yet? And where is the logic in deliberately taking a company down the pan where the only person to benefit is the official receiver? All shareholders lose if that happens - Lowe owns quite a few shares so he would be shooting himself in the head, never mind the foot. Whether he is a good chairman or not rest assured he wants success as much as any of you do yet some of the garbage theories being put forward about Lowe just show that you should stick to watching EastEnders because reality is clearly too hard and too grown up for you.
saint_or_sinner
says...
5:16pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Lowes Nemisis
says...
6:01pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Saint
says...
6:27pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Lowes Nemisis wrote:Brilliant post!
Satellite and Andy from Locks Heath the point is this; Rupert Lowe's background is in old peoples homes that was his core business background before seeing an opportunity to get in to the footy business where Sky TV money was just about to take this industry into the realms of hollywood in terms of salaries and money sloshing around the top end of the game. Ok so Lowe didn't know much about football, (he is a self confessed hockey and rugger follower) but overnight managed to head up a multi-million pound empire with a brand loyalty that most companies would kill for. It was inevitable that Lowe would make mistakes, we all do, thats life. However, it is how we learn from those mistakes that make us what we are. 10 managers in as many years is hardly good business sense in any industry but in football it's suicidal. He used company funds (£4m i believe) to shore up the share price....why couldn't he have invested that on the pitch? He also used Company funds to pursue a personal libel action against a journalist and then gave the winnings away! Most obscenely, in my opinion, he wouldn't use club funds to honour the man without whom he wouldn't have had a club to ruin in the first place. Ted Bates was a legend for Saints and should have been honoured by the club he served so well, but Lowe wouldn't and wanted the fans to pay for the statue to honour such a bgreat man, how cheap is that! He continues to treat us fans with contempt labelling us a the "lunatic fringe" because we have the temerity to question his stewardship of this once proud club. He continues to ask us to support another one of his stupid experiments in wholly relying on youth in a league where grown men struggle to survive and then charge us top money for the privilige. What we are being asked to turn up and support in unswerving passion is kids who's careers are going to be ruined because Lowe thinks its right......and of course cheap. Well I for one no longer recognised the club I started supporting in the 60's I feel more remote from it now than at any other time. I feel angry that one man's vision and views have taken us systematically backwards and we are destined for League 1 or administration or both. Why should people pay to be entertained and continually feel ripped off when walking away from St. Mary's. Continued attendance is only endorsing Lowe's vision and I for one will not do so any longer.
Chris1991
says...
6:51pm Mon 27 Oct 08
knuckle dragger
says...
7:06pm Mon 27 Oct 08
lordshill loyal
says...
7:15pm Mon 27 Oct 08
mazzie
says...
7:18pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Shazza (the genuine article, not an imposter)
says...
7:45pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite
says...
8:10pm Mon 27 Oct 08
St.Yorkie
says...
8:10pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Saint
says...
8:58pm Mon 27 Oct 08
Satellite wrote:Excuse me it was not Ted Bates who brought Lowe in. It was Guy Askham.
Lowes Nemisis, May I remind you it was Ted Bates who brought Rupert Lowe into the club as Chairman. I have also, as stated before, copies of all the financial accounts of the PLc and certainly cannot find where Company money was used to prop up the share price. If you fill unhappy supporting the Saints o'k, don't go anymore and stop posting diatribe on this site which is certainly not true. You may happiness supporting some other team.
Andy Locks Heath
says...
9:41pm Mon 27 Oct 08
the third hardest man in sholing
says...
10:24pm Mon 27 Oct 08
F Fan
says...
10:55pm Mon 27 Oct 08
knuckle dragger wrote:Knuckle dragger by name and nature. Who on earth do you think is going to loan SFC £40 million with a fan base of around 15,000 and dwindling. How will the club service the debt?
If Saints have no money in the bank then Lowe should be borrowing to bring in new players, £40 million should be enough to get us back to the premiership.
I'm a true fan and will not support the team until Lowe quits.
lorriep
says...
12:25am Tue 28 Oct 08
bogie
says...
5:26am Tue 28 Oct 08
bogie
says...
5:28am Tue 28 Oct 08
Andy Locks Heath
says...
7:11am Tue 28 Oct 08
lorriep wrote:You're doing it again aren't you? What "greed" from Lowe and Wilde? What the f**k are you talking about? Greed is Stern John doing what all footballers do (in case you hadn't noticed) of claiming a transfer was against their wishes which is done so they don't lose their share of the transfer fee - duh. In what way does the club's current position benefit Lowe or anyone else connected with the club? This is clearly all beyond you, so stick to 4-4-2.
i'm getting fed up with the words"high wage earners" club has no money" if thats the case why did we spend £1.25m on a unproven midfilder in schneiderlin? this kind of cash could have got us 2 decent centre halves, and kept stern john, the only player saints have that can hold the ball, and score from anywhere.
lowe & wilde have broken this club for their own greed. lowe really doesn't care what happens to saints, he has his own agenda..
if these 2 are still here next season, then ,i am not a high wage earner, and i have no money to spend on renewing my season ticket.
Costa Baz
says...
9:23am Tue 28 Oct 08
Chris1991 wrote:Chris, you ask where the traditional way of doing things got us. How about the top flight for 27 years, plus trips to Wembley and European football.
Intersting talk about Rupert's experiments. Clive Woodward was brought in to improve the team. It was Harry that didn't like Woodward and rubbished everything he did. Harry knew best because he'd been in football all his life. You can't teach Harry anything. In fact Harry was so good, when he relegated us, it wasn't his fault. Must have been Woodward's. A lot of the things Woodward brought in are still being used today. There has been a few changes in management and at the board since then so they've had plenty of chances to change things. They are still used because they are good and beneficial. There were a lot of supporters too that ridiculed Woodward. Just like there's a lot who ridicule Jan and although I wouldn't equate Jan with Clive Woodward, they were / are both being undermined by people who think that they know best. Sometimes you have to try something different. The traditional way has got us where exactly? Yes we can plod on doing what we always have done and disapear into oblivion or try something different but if we do try something different, at least give the team the support it deserves. If all we get is whinging we will never get success and sucess is the only way to get rid of Rupert.
Shoong
says...
10:23am Tue 28 Oct 08
Saint
says...
10:55am Tue 28 Oct 08
Andy Locks Heath wrote:Fair play Andy!
Some of the posts disagreeing with me make a lot of good points so at I'm more than happy to shake hands with Saint and Lowes nemesis even though I side with Satelite, Rob and Chris - at least we've managed to raise the bar. Saint made the excellent observation that this is now an entertainment business, not just a spectator sport - in other words people demand success - you don't pay to go to the theatre to see dross, now it's the same with football. To be fair though if we want to criticise the performance of the team or of Lowe the first thing is to stop using the benefit of hindsight. I've been saying for a few years that we should make more use of the youth talent - so now that we are and it's not working I'll stand up and say that I thought at the time it was a brilliant new plan, and not just blame the subsequent decline on Lowe. But I'm guessing that the wage bill has to be trimmed on the orders of the bank which is why the biggest earners go first. This is the only aspect in which Lowe influences team selection - he doesn't pick the team, he doesn't dictate the tactics and he certainly isn't dragging SFC down because he likes hockey not football!
The Southern Daily Echo will not tolerate comments posted on this message board which are deemed to be distasteful or offensive in any way. This includes homophobic and racist remarks. Anyone posting inappropriate comments risks having their account banned from using this site. The Echo will also fully co-operate with police by providing details, when requested, in relation to such incidents, which may lead to prosecution.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with