When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
11:10am Tuesday 27th January 2009
Rupert Lowe, Michael Wilde and Andrew Cowen offered to quit Saints – if Leon Crouch found £6m to wipe out the club’s overdraft.
The stunning revelation comes as the pressure grows on the major shareholders during a crucial month on and off the pitch.
The Daily Echo understands the offer came last Friday during a meeting requested by Crouch where the former chairman offered to put in £2m himself ... if Lowe and Wilde did the same.
The three men are the leading Southampton Leisure Holdings PLC shareholders – Wilde owns around 16 per cent, Crouch around 10 per cent and Lowe around six per cent.
Crouch’s offer also came with the condition that Jan Poortvliet was sacked and replaced by an English manager.
Lowe and Wilde are understood to have refused Crouch’s offer. But they did give him the chance to stump up all the cash himself, promising they would resign and leave him to run the club if he did.
Whether Lowe and Wilde have £2m in cash lying around to put into the club is unclear. Crouch has told the Daily Echo he certainly does not have £6m.
However, with his local business contacts including the likes of his former Saints PLC board supporter Patrick Trant, the money would have been accepted if it would have been funded by a number of sources backing Crouch.
The structure of the payments into the club would not havebeen gifts, rather interest free loans repayable on the club’s return to the Premiership.
The reason for the figure of around £6m is that it would wipe out the club’s overdraft which is the debt that is really crippling Saints.
It is that debt which incurs a high rate of interest and it is also understood Barclay’s Bank are keen to reduce the overdraft.
That potentially means Saints would be totally at their mercy as to whether they could continue as they are or have to go into administration.
It is because they have to try and reduce that overdraft that there have been talks at the very highest levels of having to sell players this month.
When contacted by the Daily Echo, Wilde confirmed the meeting had taken place but not the exact details. He said: “This is a board matter.
“We had a meeting with Leon Crouch who made a proposal. There was a discussion and our financial advisors will put our considerations to Leon in writing.
“It’s a matter between the parties and we have no intention of making it public.”
Though Crouch refused the counter offer from Lowe and Wilde it is not clear whether he could go back and change his mind if people come forward to share the cost but it seems fairly likely.
Any such deal would have to come with some kind of agreement from Lowe and Wilde that they would not use their shareholdings to oust Crouch as soon as he was back in.
But the significant thing about the counter offer is that the money will not go into the pockets of the shareholders but rather directly into the club coffers where it would have a meaningful and lasting impact.
It also means a regime change could have taken place at Saints for a fraction of the ₤15-20m that had previously been talked about for such an event to take place.
UTS, says...
8:18am Tue 27 Jan 09
Rich, London wrote:Quite how you can say 'Leon Crouch may not be the best guy ever at the helm' after just 16 weeks beggers belief ! If only we had that perfect or out rule years ago and got rid of Lowe !
Leon Crouch may not be the best guy ever to have been at the helm of SFC. But he is a fan, who puts his own (significant) cash into the club and is willing to do so again to help save us. Pay attention now Rupes....
Invidia, southampton says...
8:25am Tue 27 Jan 09
seatonsaint, seaton says...
8:27am Tue 27 Jan 09
Millbrook Dave, millbrook says...
8:29am Tue 27 Jan 09
UTS, says...
8:47am Tue 27 Jan 09
ray the turk, southampton says...
8:52am Tue 27 Jan 09
Invidia, southampton says...
8:56am Tue 27 Jan 09
ray the turk wrote:Ray, don't give up your day job, your verse is terrible
Oh what a day.. what a delight.. News 5 days old.. not a mention in sight !! We're kept in the dark on revelations like this.. An offer like this even Barclays can't miss. Surely someone's out there with pot loads of dosh.. Someone who knows football... like Beckham (or Posh). We could scour the market even in loony bins.. Or even go out with our hats and our tins. Dig deep mates whoever you are.. spare a few bob.. sell your car So Crouch made an offer... lets start there. Here lies a bloke who seems to care. Lets get behind him .. see where he goes. It can't be any worse than this (who knows). If some one is caring, someone who tries.. It may even work.. now ther's a surprise.!!
Kate, Andover, says...
9:01am Tue 27 Jan 09
UTS wrote:I don't really see what problem it is for RL and WM to want to make money out of the club. After all, if that it was happens, it means the club is doing well. no? And we all work to make money don't we??
Yes as the above shows Lowe and Wilde are only interested in money and not Southampton FC. I presume Crouch would have to buy all their shares as well and double their current value.
BIg-Al, South London says...
9:18am Tue 27 Jan 09
Millbrook Dave wrote:When will you loonies ever learn? Rupert holds 6% of the club - that didn't come cheap when he invested all those year ago. He is a clever financial businessman and is THE ONLY route for this club to avoid administration. He has admitted that there have been mistakes - but don't forget that it was Mr "I'm a fan" Crouch that spent £11m that we didn't have and put us in this dire financial situation.
LOWE WILL ONLY EVER TAKE MONEY OUT OF THE CLUB HE HAS NEVER PUT IN ONE PENNY OF HIS OWN MONEY.AND AS FOR THE SCOUSE TAX AVOIDER . . .
Invidia, southampton says...
9:20am Tue 27 Jan 09
Rich, London, says...
9:23am Tue 27 Jan 09
UTS wrote:"beggars belief"? Really?! chill out UTS - I dont see much wrong with what I said
Rich, London wrote: Leon Crouch may not be the best guy ever to have been at the helm of SFC. But he is a fan, who puts his own (significant) cash into the club and is willing to do so again to help save us. Pay attention now Rupes....Quite how you can say 'Leon Crouch may not be the best guy ever at the helm' after just 16 weeks beggers belief ! If only we had that perfect or out rule years ago and got rid of Lowe ! The bank will force Lowe out at the end of the day. They didnt want him back as they know what was going to happen and it predictably did. Wilde wants out i know that much.
Invidia, southampton says...
9:23am Tue 27 Jan 09
BIg-Al wrote:Well big-Al RL shares came very cheap, he awarded them to himself instead of taking dividends
Millbrook Dave wrote: LOWE WILL ONLY EVER TAKE MONEY OUT OF THE CLUB HE HAS NEVER PUT IN ONE PENNY OF HIS OWN MONEY.AND AS FOR THE SCOUSE TAX AVOIDER . . .When will you loonies ever learn? Rupert holds 6% of the club - that didn't come cheap when he invested all those year ago. He is a clever financial businessman and is THE ONLY route for this club to avoid administration. He has admitted that there have been mistakes - but don't forget that it was Mr "I'm a fan" Crouch that spent £11m that we didn't have and put us in this dire financial situation. Last weeks terrible attempt to demonstrate ouutside SMS was a complete waste of time - for a start, Mr Lowe wasn't even there! It was interesting also that a large majority of the the protesters were all kids themselves - I didn't see many people over 18. You and all you other 'so called fans' should stop posting negatives and stop filling this board with unfounded rubbish. "Real" fans support their club and stop public whinging.
UTS, says...
9:25am Tue 27 Jan 09
BIg-Al wrote:Load of total garbage.
Millbrook Dave wrote: LOWE WILL ONLY EVER TAKE MONEY OUT OF THE CLUB HE HAS NEVER PUT IN ONE PENNY OF HIS OWN MONEY.AND AS FOR THE SCOUSE TAX AVOIDER . . .When will you loonies ever learn? Rupert holds 6% of the club - that didn't come cheap when he invested all those year ago. He is a clever financial businessman and is THE ONLY route for this club to avoid administration. He has admitted that there have been mistakes - but don't forget that it was Mr "I'm a fan" Crouch that spent £11m that we didn't have and put us in this dire financial situation. Last weeks terrible attempt to demonstrate ouutside SMS was a complete waste of time - for a start, Mr Lowe wasn't even there! It was interesting also that a large majority of the the protesters were all kids themselves - I didn't see many people over 18. You and all you other 'so called fans' should stop posting negatives and stop filling this board with unfounded rubbish. "Real" fans support their club and stop public whinging.
Mark-, Southampton says...
9:39am Tue 27 Jan 09
Mark-, Southampton says...
9:43am Tue 27 Jan 09
Kate, Andover wrote:Money was spend that we didn't have (not sure is 11m is correct though? but the question i put to you, is - The finance director was in charge then and is still in charge now. If we did not have that money to spend - why was this sanctioned by him - would love to see his roles and responsibilities on hi job spec....
UTS wrote: Yes as the above shows Lowe and Wilde are only interested in money and not Southampton FC. I presume Crouch would have to buy all their shares as well and double their current value.I don't really see what problem it is for RL and WM to want to make money out of the club. After all, if that it was happens, it means the club is doing well. no? And we all work to make money don't we?? I guess what is wrong is when they'll do what's right for the themselves before they do what's right for the club. Got it. But, this £2m each sounds like a good compromise to me, now if only Crouch (or anyone with the financial/voting clout) could get them to agree to go and leave SFC and preferably the PLC too. Ah well - the soap opera continues and I don't think it's going to end for a while so on with the game tonight and hopefully three points.............. . COYR!!!!!!!!!!!!
StEmmosfire, Woolston says...
9:44am Tue 27 Jan 09
UTS, says...
9:50am Tue 27 Jan 09
Mark- wrote:Yes Dave Jones is very much responsible. Also anyone ever wondered why the banks allowed further spending ? Dave Jones was also telling Lowe everything what happened in the boardroom from 2006 to 2008.
Kate, Andover wrote:Money was spend that we didn't have (not sure is 11m is correct though? but the question i put to you, is - The finance director was in charge then and is still in charge now. If we did not have that money to spend - why was this sanctioned by him - would love to see his roles and responsibilities on hi job spec....UTS wrote: Yes as the above shows Lowe and Wilde are only interested in money and not Southampton FC. I presume Crouch would have to buy all their shares as well and double their current value.I don't really see what problem it is for RL and WM to want to make money out of the club. After all, if that it was happens, it means the club is doing well. no? And we all work to make money don't we?? I guess what is wrong is when they'll do what's right for the themselves before they do what's right for the club. Got it. But, this £2m each sounds like a good compromise to me, now if only Crouch (or anyone with the financial/voting clout) could get them to agree to go and leave SFC and preferably the PLC too. Ah well - the soap opera continues and I don't think it's going to end for a while so on with the game tonight and hopefully three points.............. . COYR!!!!!!!!!!!!
St.Yorkie, Pocklington says...
9:53am Tue 27 Jan 09
StEmmosfire, Woolston says...
9:59am Tue 27 Jan 09
St.Yorkie wrote:Its about time the fans dug deep into their pockets. We could have a democracy! Vote on decisions etc.
Then again 15,000 x £400 (a season ticket) and the club is the fans - but what then? Would Mr Crouch be the choice in the boardroom? The clubs overdraft removed and an English manager is a very nice thought. What about "bonds" for the fans who invest?
St.Yorkie, Pocklington says...
10:15am Tue 27 Jan 09
Kate, Andover, says...
10:17am Tue 27 Jan 09
StEmmosfire wrote:Like Ebsfleet?
St.Yorkie wrote: Then again 15,000 x £400 (a season ticket) and the club is the fans - but what then? Would Mr Crouch be the choice in the boardroom? The clubs overdraft removed and an English manager is a very nice thought. What about "bonds" for the fans who invest?Its about time the fans dug deep into their pockets. We could have a democracy! Vote on decisions etc.
Invidia, southampton says...
10:21am Tue 27 Jan 09
BRIAN from bartley, Bartley says...
10:29am Tue 27 Jan 09
Egomaniac, Southampton says...
10:31am Tue 27 Jan 09
Help The Saints, Southampton says...
10:33am Tue 27 Jan 09
allsaintsnocurves, Southampton says...
11:10am Tue 27 Jan 09
ray the turk, southampton says...
11:27am Tue 27 Jan 09
Invidia wrote:I'm Ray the Turk
ray the turk wrote: Oh what a day.. what a delight.. News 5 days old.. not a mention in sight !! We're kept in the dark on revelations like this.. An offer like this even Barclays can't miss. Surely someone's out there with pot loads of dosh.. Someone who knows football... like Beckham (or Posh). We could scour the market even in loony bins.. Or even go out with our hats and our tins. Dig deep mates whoever you are.. spare a few bob.. sell your car So Crouch made an offer... lets start there. Here lies a bloke who seems to care. Lets get behind him .. see where he goes. It can't be any worse than this (who knows). If some one is caring, someone who tries.. It may even work.. now ther's a surprise.!!Ray, don't give up your day job, your verse is terrible
RedRover, Romsey says...
11:35am Tue 27 Jan 09
Kate, Andover wrote:Agreed Kate, they should make some money given their positions in the club. What upsets people is the fact its a one way street. If they were pulling investment into the club at the same time as draining it away it might be more acceptable.
UTS wrote: Yes as the above shows Lowe and Wilde are only interested in money and not Southampton FC. I presume Crouch would have to buy all their shares as well and double their current value.I don't really see what problem it is for RL and WM to want to make money out of the club. After all, if that it was happens, it means the club is doing well. no? And we all work to make money don't we?? I guess what is wrong is when they'll do what's right for the themselves before they do what's right for the club. Got it. But, this £2m each sounds like a good compromise to me, now if only Crouch (or anyone with the financial/voting clout) could get them to agree to go and leave SFC and preferably the PLC too. Ah well - the soap opera continues and I don't think it's going to end for a while so on with the game tonight and hopefully three points.............. . COYR!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dickosfc, Lordswood says...
11:36am Tue 27 Jan 09
Court Jester Crew, Southampton says...
11:39am Tue 27 Jan 09
Denzil', Chilworth says...
11:57am Tue 27 Jan 09
Redhat, Southampton says...
12:16pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Jason D, Salisbury says...
1:19pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Invidia, southampton says...
1:30pm Tue 27 Jan 09
loweout@hotmail.co.uk, St. Marys says...
1:33pm Tue 27 Jan 09
BIg-Al wrote:Big Al, what a load of rubbish. You are out of touch with what is happening at SMS.
Millbrook Dave wrote: LOWE WILL ONLY EVER TAKE MONEY OUT OF THE CLUB HE HAS NEVER PUT IN ONE PENNY OF HIS OWN MONEY.AND AS FOR THE SCOUSE TAX AVOIDER . . .When will you loonies ever learn? Rupert holds 6% of the club - that didn't come cheap when he invested all those year ago. He is a clever financial businessman and is THE ONLY route for this club to avoid administration. He has admitted that there have been mistakes - but don't forget that it was Mr "I'm a fan" Crouch that spent £11m that we didn't have and put us in this dire financial situation. Last weeks terrible attempt to demonstrate ouutside SMS was a complete waste of time - for a start, Mr Lowe wasn't even there! It was interesting also that a large majority of the the protesters were all kids themselves - I didn't see many people over 18. You and all you other 'so called fans' should stop posting negatives and stop filling this board with unfounded rubbish. "Real" fans support their club and stop public whinging.
loweout@hotmail.co.uk, St. Marys says...
1:40pm Tue 27 Jan 09
BRIAN from bartley wrote:Well done on your post Brian. You are right with the financial effect Lowe and Wildes presence is having on our financial status.
At the recent A.G.M. I made the following comment "For every 1,000 fans that you (Rupert Lowe) upset and stay away, cost us, our club 1/2 million pounds a year" I am not a wealthy person, nor am I an accountant, just a long life supporter of the Saints and like so many saddened by what is happening at the club due to none football persons making such a mess of the club. As I read the situation there is an need for Leon Crouich to raise £4 million to rid this club of Lowe and Wilde. It is only an idea, but if 4,000 local companies and supporters could be found who could and would invest £1,000 each on a non returnable basis, and in regonition be given one free season ticket for the next TWO years it would raise right now the £4,000,000.required . Anyone following up this post, I would ask you respectfully to think carefully of your reply, I repeat I am not wealthy, not an accountant just a caring supporter of over 60 years.
allsaintsnocurves, Southampton says...
1:44pm Tue 27 Jan 09
BP, Southampton says...
1:55pm Tue 27 Jan 09
BP, Southampton says...
2:31pm Tue 27 Jan 09
lowe and behold, southampton says...
2:56pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Costa Baz, Southampton says...
3:32pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Satellite, Erpingham. Norfolk says...
3:37pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Dickosfc, Lordswood says...
4:11pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Satellite wrote:What a 42 carrot Prat!!
What a great PR stunt by Crouch!, £6M to pay off the overdraft. Still no money to pay off the existing Manager,Coaches,Back room staff. No money to buy new players and no money for the day to day running of the club. I know UTS and invidia keep stating Crouch was only Chairman for a short time, but in that time he did nothing to stop the Club haemorrhaging money. Gambled on promotion and lost. Why not wait for the club to go into administration and then pay off all the creditors, it would be far cheaper for him. Because he would lose is share money as well. Trouble is Crouch knows it is a PR stunt that will get the fans raving. Anyone who thinks it is a good idea, then go to the nearest drain and throw your money away. Await you comments UTS,invidia.
Fides, Southampton says...
4:50pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Satellite wrote:I'm afraid that people on this site think only Lowe is capable of PR - when his PR is in fact the worst I've seen for a long time.
What a great PR stunt by Crouch!, £6M to pay off the overdraft. Still no money to pay off the existing Manager,Coaches,Back
room staff. No money to buy new players and no money for the day to day running of the club.
I know UTS and invidia keep stating Crouch was only Chairman for a short time, but in that time he did nothing to stop the Club haemorrhaging money. Gambled on promotion and lost.
Why not wait for the club to go into administration and then pay off all the creditors, it would be far cheaper for him. Because he would lose is share money as well.
Trouble is Crouch knows it is a PR stunt that will get the fans raving.
Anyone who thinks it is a good idea, then go to the nearest drain and throw your money away. Await you comments UTS,invidia.
Jesus_02, Freemantle says...
5:22pm Tue 27 Jan 09
robhythe, Southampton says...
5:26pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Fides wrote:If Lowe goes it will unite the fans ! Do you agree??? Then more fans attend ( i think minimum 3000 extra) So minimum 1.5 million quid a season without programs etc
Satellite wrote: What a great PR stunt by Crouch!, £6M to pay off the overdraft. Still no money to pay off the existing Manager,Coaches,Back room staff. No money to buy new players and no money for the day to day running of the club. I know UTS and invidia keep stating Crouch was only Chairman for a short time, but in that time he did nothing to stop the Club haemorrhaging money. Gambled on promotion and lost. Why not wait for the club to go into administration and then pay off all the creditors, it would be far cheaper for him. Because he would lose is share money as well. Trouble is Crouch knows it is a PR stunt that will get the fans raving. Anyone who thinks it is a good idea, then go to the nearest drain and throw your money away. Await you comments UTS,invidia.I'm afraid that people on this site think only Lowe is capable of PR - when his PR is in fact the worst I've seen for a long time. You have rightly identified a rather obvious attempt by Crouch to curry favour with fans at absolutely no risk to himself or his cash. Even if the £6m was found to pay off the overdraft and Lowe and Wilde gave up their positions what next - that's the elephant in the room which everyone continues to ignore. And please preserve me from a Saint's fans co-op to run the club. Much as I support the Co-operative movement there is a time and place for everything and English football clubs ain't it.
Costa Baz, Southampton says...
7:59pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Fides wrote:PR or not, it has put Lowe and Wilde on the spot.
Satellite wrote: What a great PR stunt by Crouch!, £6M to pay off the overdraft. Still no money to pay off the existing Manager,Coaches,Back room staff. No money to buy new players and no money for the day to day running of the club. I know UTS and invidia keep stating Crouch was only Chairman for a short time, but in that time he did nothing to stop the Club haemorrhaging money. Gambled on promotion and lost. Why not wait for the club to go into administration and then pay off all the creditors, it would be far cheaper for him. Because he would lose is share money as well. Trouble is Crouch knows it is a PR stunt that will get the fans raving. Anyone who thinks it is a good idea, then go to the nearest drain and throw your money away. Await you comments UTS,invidia.I'm afraid that people on this site think only Lowe is capable of PR - when his PR is in fact the worst I've seen for a long time. You have rightly identified a rather obvious attempt by Crouch to curry favour with fans at absolutely no risk to himself or his cash. Even if the £6m was found to pay off the overdraft and Lowe and Wilde gave up their positions what next - that's the elephant in the room which everyone continues to ignore. And please preserve me from a Saint's fans co-op to run the club. Much as I support the Co-operative movement there is a time and place for everything and English football clubs ain't it.
doctorsaint, Hedge End says...
10:01pm Tue 27 Jan 09
Satellite, Erpingham. Norfolk says...
10:38am Wed 28 Jan 09
SaintJez, London says...
12:46pm Wed 28 Jan 09
Costa Baz, Southampton says...
2:42pm Wed 28 Jan 09
Satellite wrote:Let me put this as simply as I can.
Costa baz,doctorsaint, may I put it as simply as I can; Barclays want £6M to pay off the overdraft, they know the state of the clubs finances and will immediately reduce the overdraft amount to £1M. In these 'Credit Crunch' times they know that the securities they hold against the overdraft,will guarantee their out-lay, more so than the £6M at present. It's a PR stunt that no business man in his right mind would touch.
damien thorn, west end says...
4:54pm Wed 28 Jan 09
Jesus_02, Freemantle says...
8:37am Thu 29 Jan 09
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
The Daily Echo - First for Southampton FC News | Keep checking this website for the latest Saints news
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Rich, London, says...
8:13am Tue 27 Jan 09