Shaw could make Premier League debut at Arsenal (From Daily Echo)

Chipster wrote:
Sorry about type errors, crap keyboard!

george chivers wrote:
Interesting. Not the best game for the boy to make start his Saints career, but if needs be. We do need to solve our defensive problems quickly if we are to maintain our self belief. I doubt Shaw will be the main fix at LB for this season, but I am sure he is a good long term prospect.

Let's hope our Japanese international is ready for Saturday. Fonte is certainly not up to PL standard and I am concerned about Hooiveld. If Kelvin hadn't saved those two pens and we hadn't led against the Mancs x 2 what would we be saying now about Jos?

Two tackles from behind in the in the penalty area in the first three games. You can't do that in the PL. Plenty of room for improvement there. But I'm sure we will turn it around soon I have every confidence we make 12th-ish place come the end of the season.

tedwalsh wrote:
Didnt a certain 17yo called Alan Shearer also make his debut against Arsenal? Seem to remember he didnt do too bad!

notaclue wrote:
I watched Luke Shaw play in the Liebherr Trophy against Anderlecht and I for one have no concerns about seeing him on the pitch on Saturday - but Danny Fox should.

Chipster wrote:
About ****ing time if you ask me!

It goes without saying that our greatest weakness is our defence, 8 goals conceded in 3 games. Yes we played extremely well and two of those teams were the Mancs, but we desperately need to tighte up at the back. Both Fonte and Fox have been found out far too easily for me, there were early signs back in the Championship.

Ward-Prowse has stepped up to the mark so why not Luke Shaw, let the lad show his quality. Also give Jose a break and get the new Japanese lad in at CB, otherwise why did we buy him?

We have no points but are only 3 games into the season but we cant let the gap widen to the point where we'd never close it, Saturday I'll settle for a point against Arsenal or even an ugly win!

Its far too early to panic and its eay to see where our strengths and weaknesses lay, its upto NA to sort things out. And lets not forget he is also on a learning curve, okay it appeared he cocked up the subs but we should ut him some slack. After all he did have a huge part to play i our promotion to the Premier League

tugboat wrote:

Chipster wrote: Sorry about type errors, crap keyboard!

Doesnt detract from it being a great post chipster.agree with every bit of it.

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
JWP has been picked despite having several midfielders to chose from. He is being picked ahead of them.

Fox was being picked ahead of Shaw and we tried real hard to buy another LB. Maybe Shaw isn't deemed quite ready yet? Obviously I hope he is but don't want to see him played before he's ready and get the confidence knocked out of him.

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:

Chipster wrote:
About ****ing time if you ask me!

It goes without saying that our greatest weakness is our defence, 8 goals conceded in 3 games. Yes we played extremely well and two of those teams were the Mancs, but we desperately need to tighte up at the back. Both Fonte and Fox have been found out far too easily for me, there were early signs back in the Championship.

Ward-Prowse has stepped up to the mark so why not Luke Shaw, let the lad show his quality. Also give Jose a break and get the new Japanese lad in at CB, otherwise why did we buy him?

We have no points but are only 3 games into the season but we cant let the gap widen to the point where we'd never close it, Saturday I'll settle for a point against Arsenal or even an ugly win!

Its far too early to panic and its eay to see where our strengths and weaknesses lay, its upto NA to sort things out. And lets not forget he is also on a learning curve, okay it appeared he cocked up the subs but we should ut him some slack. After all he did have a huge part to play i our promotion to the Premier League

Rickie was absolutely dead on his feet. If NA had left him on and we'd lost he'd be criticised for not bringing on fresh legs.

Scholes changed that game. Even hattrick hero RVP said Scholes was MOTM for him!

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Fox gets a lot of criticism but he is good going forward and delivers good crosses. He just seems to get out of position too easily and gets far too central leaving the whole wing exposed which if they have a pacey wide player means he hits the byline unchallenged.

Sainty saint saint wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Fox gets a lot of criticism but he is good going forward and delivers good crosses. He just seems to get out of position too easily and gets far too central leaving the whole wing exposed which if they have a pacey wide player means he hits the byline unchallenged.

I guess I come from the old-fashioned view that defenders defend and attack when they can, rather than defenders attack and defend if they really have to!

I feel the same about Glen Johnson playing for England - I'd never pick him because, frankly, he can't defend for toffee!

Don-Irelando wrote:

tugboat wrote:

Chipster wrote: Sorry about type errors, crap keyboard!

Doesnt detract from it being a great post chipster.agree with every bit of it.

I on the other hand disagree with all of it! How has Fox been found out in the Premier League?? Now Im not saying he is a having the time of his life but by no means is he the scapegoat that everyone is making him about to be. out of the 8 goals concede I would say he was at fault for one of them (the nasri assist) at a push you could say uniteds second but as we have adopted zonal defending I would say it was Gulys fault for not getting tighter to his man. As for Yoshida being the answer to all our prayers by being so good we drop Fonte, and Jos up's his game and stops giving pens away all in the space of the one training session they will have before saturday- do me a favour. Everyone seems to be an expert on this kid on here but I will put money on the fact that 90% of people have never seen him play. Unlike that manager of ours who sees him in training day in and day out and still thinks that fox is a better choice. even to the extent that he wants him to take and injection to his groin to get him on the pitch. With our wingers pushing forward in the 4-3-3 formation our LB and RB will always suffer and it is up to our CB's to clear any balls into the area which until the last 10 of united they were doing well. I think that arsenal will struggle with our arial ability and i fancy a 2-1 win. If Shaw does play then good luck to the lad, I think that we will need to put Lallana on the left in order to cover him though. blooding a young defender is very different to a midfielder or striker as any mistake means your opponent is at the last line of your defence and in on goal. Bale being a prime example when he first moved to tottenham.

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Fox gets a lot of criticism but he is good going forward and delivers good crosses. He just seems to get out of position too easily and gets far too central leaving the whole wing exposed which if they have a pacey wide player means he hits the byline unchallenged.

I guess I come from the old-fashioned view that defenders defend and attack when they can, rather than defenders attack and defend if they really have to!

I feel the same about Glen Johnson playing for England - I'd never pick him because, frankly, he can't defend for toffee!

Many can't. I think their job is to get up and down the wing. These days the 'proper' defenders seem to be the centre backs.

WobblyCat wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

tugboat wrote:

Chipster wrote: Sorry about type errors, crap keyboard!

Doesnt detract from it being a great post chipster.agree with every bit of it.

I on the other hand disagree with all of it! How has Fox been found out in the Premier League?? Now Im not saying he is a having the time of his life but by no means is he the scapegoat that everyone is making him about to be. out of the 8 goals concede I would say he was at fault for one of them (the nasri assist) at a push you could say uniteds second but as we have adopted zonal defending I would say it was Gulys fault for not getting tighter to his man. As for Yoshida being the answer to all our prayers by being so good we drop Fonte, and Jos up's his game and stops giving pens away all in the space of the one training session they will have before saturday- do me a favour. Everyone seems to be an expert on this kid on here but I will put money on the fact that 90% of people have never seen him play. Unlike that manager of ours who sees him in training day in and day out and still thinks that fox is a better choice. even to the extent that he wants him to take and injection to his groin to get him on the pitch. With our wingers pushing forward in the 4-3-3 formation our LB and RB will always suffer and it is up to our CB's to clear any balls into the area which until the last 10 of united they were doing well. I think that arsenal will struggle with our arial ability and i fancy a 2-1 win. If Shaw does play then good luck to the lad, I think that we will need to put Lallana on the left in order to cover him though. blooding a young defender is very different to a midfielder or striker as any mistake means your opponent is at the last line of your defence and in on goal. Bale being a prime example when he first moved to tottenham.

You judge a defender on the amount of goals that are down to him? What about near misses, let offs and general all round play! Fox attacks well but is defensively poor, that's my opinion having seen all 3 games. And we're all experts on here! Good post Chippy!

Sainty saint saint wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Fox gets a lot of criticism but he is good going forward and delivers good crosses. He just seems to get out of position too easily and gets far too central leaving the whole wing exposed which if they have a pacey wide player means he hits the byline unchallenged.

I guess I come from the old-fashioned view that defenders defend and attack when they can, rather than defenders attack and defend if they really have to!

I feel the same about Glen Johnson playing for England - I'd never pick him because, frankly, he can't defend for toffee!

Many can't. I think their job is to get up and down the wing. These days the 'proper' defenders seem to be the centre backs.

I kind of see what you mean, but look at Ashley Cole (putting his many personal faults aside for one moment!)

To me he's the yardstick for decent LBs and RBs - he gets forward well but never forgets that he's a defender. He does get up and down, but actually knows how to defend...

Scarborosaint wrote:
There is no doubting fox is better going forward than defending and I would not want to curb his attacking play but unlike Clyde or Ashley cole he unfortunately has not got the pace to get himself out of trouble on occasions and so he needs to improve his positional sense for the extra pace of the premiership , reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

More Glory wrote:
Another product from the academy then. Where did this one get poached from - not Pompey then? wow - Kingston upon Thames.... keep trying and you may get some proper home grown boys

saintshorse101 wrote:
so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote: Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point. You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that? Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else? Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote: Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point. You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that? Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else? Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

St Retford wrote:
Anyone reckon we'll see Ramirez?

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

saintshorse101 wrote:
so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox!
what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him!
as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Don-Irelando wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote: Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point. You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that? Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else? Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

can you explain why he is our biggest defensive liability? When amoungst other things Jos has given away two pens, fonte got mugged off against Kone, both failed to pick up van persie late on. Cygne slipped for uniteds first. no-one has been solid and I think what people are getting narked about is that people are pointing the finger at negatives rather then the positives. This could quite easily have been a forum about how good our academy is but instead it has turned into everyone slating Fox. I think Fox will play this weekend and I would be very suprised if either Walcott or Diaby make an appearance- arsenal have games thick and fast now and i think they will believe at of there games they could do without them in this one! think again!! KD NC,JF,JH,DF JW-P,MS,AL JP,RL,JR

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

Tirau Dan wrote:
KD
NC,JF,MY,LS
MS, SD, AL
EM, RL, GR

whoever starts I'm proud of the guys on the bench too this is a team and they are very much part of it. TA1WAS

we'll cut them open and gut them
Saints 3-0 all the way.

St Retford wrote:
Anyone reckon we'll see Ramirez?

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

No I trust my judgement, you are sad boring tw*t, you are just in denial fella. I bet you do hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit from people in your presence. Have a longer think about it and a good look in the mirror, I know you’re not entirely stupid and you can work it out. There is no more glory than a man who has friends .... you poor lonely skunt

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

No I trust my judgement, you are sad boring tw*t, you are just in denial fella. I bet you do hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit from people in your presence. Have a longer think about it and a good look in the mirror, I know you’re not entirely stupid and you can work it out. There is no more glory than a man who has friends .... you poor lonely skunt

no man is an Island....... no; I only hear boring on this forum. It's a Southampton thing;

More Glory wrote:
Another product from the academy then. Where did this one get poached from - not Pompey then? wow - Kingston upon Thames.... keep trying and you may get some proper home grown boys

SaintMax wrote:
I played leftback in the wessex league, and even had David Peach say I had a good game a few times.. so I think I know a bit about the position.
For my money a good LB needs to be able to defend first and formost (obviously), positionally support the CB's if they are exposed and work and swap with his fellow left sided players.
So far this season Fox has been caught out positionally and his defending has often been questioniable. Yes, the best form of defence is attack but not when you are 2 goals down and your fullback keeps on getting exposed. That only pulls the CBs out of position, and Fonte cant currently cut it in this league. Give Shaw a chance I say.

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

CB FRY LIVES wrote:
As i was saying as for Danny Fox if he does get to start he is due a good game.He has got to prove that he is truly worth his international status.Two Scots from yester year who used to do the business at the Dell for the SAINTS were thegreat Dennis Hollywood and the lesser known Tommy Hare.Now those 2 boys knew how to tackle some.Those were the days.

Strasbourg Saint wrote:

More Glory wrote: Another product from the academy then. Where did this one get poached from - not Pompey then? wow - Kingston upon Thames.... keep trying and you may get some proper home grown boys

What, like Darren Anderton, you mean? Just asking!

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

Mush On The Beach wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:
As i was saying as for Danny Fox if he does get to start he is due a good game.He has got to prove that he is truly worth his international status.Two Scots from yester year who used to do the business at the Dell for the SAINTS were thegreat Dennis Hollywood and the lesser known Tommy Hare.Now those 2 boys knew how to tackle some.Those were the days.

Hey old timer, don’t forget those jock wipper snappers Steele and McCalliog, according to Grandma Mush

Mush On The Beach wrote:
Why are you still here then? ..... It’s a jealous skunt thing. THE END

Dr Dread wrote:
Perhaps we'll go 3511. Then Fox can play a bit further up the pitch. Playing in a 433 he doesn't have the cover that previous LBs had. Who wouldn't look a great player with Marsden ahead.

seventh-junction wrote:

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

Yeah but you are a tw@t and you haven't acknowledged that yet you gobby fish f@cker. You are boring as many have already commented and spend to much time on here. F@ck off back to the news site and bore the rest of the fish batterers Oh and just to keep you up to speed and to stop you making a bigger tw@t of yourself than you already do ( if that is possible) We now play in all red not red and white stripes so the deck chair dig is well out of date WTFILN FOADP

More Glory wrote:

seventh-junction wrote:

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

Yeah but you are a tw@t and you haven't acknowledged that yet you gobby fish f@cker. You are boring as many have already commented and spend to much time on here. F@ck off back to the news site and bore the rest of the fish batterers Oh and just to keep you up to speed and to stop you making a bigger tw@t of yourself than you already do ( if that is possible) We now play in all red not red and white stripes so the deck chair dig is well out of date WTFILN FOADP

One season without stripes doesn't make a lifestory. Deck chairs always start to empty out before the end of the day....just like St Faries; so the analogy is spot on.

seventh-junction wrote:
Yawning Bore Me Do you wear gloves when doing your pet flat fish for extra grip ?

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:
Why are you still here then? ..... It’s a jealous skunt thing. THE END

Your'e not stressed are you? You should have seen all the Pompey pages over the last 18 months; full of deck chairs. I've just been here for 3 days. See that is my point; you guys lack patience

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

you are so wrong! talk about not following football matters!
in the past we had to sell most of our academy players to keep afloat! you see selling players instead of buying keeps a club in the black! especially when you get huge offers for players! though a few players have stayed with the club through loyalty! le tiss, lallana are 2 for you. if however all you care about in football, which is more like a business these days, is loyalty and having hometown players then you will enjoy poopey being in the blue square! just a quick question, how many of the players in the starting line up for your fa cup `win` were from poopey?
i dont care where a player is from, as soon as he puts on the red and white he is a saints player!
i do think you need to more out of the 60`s, which being form poopey must be hard!

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

you are so wrong! talk about not following football matters! in the past we had to sell most of our academy players to keep afloat! you see selling players instead of buying keeps a club in the black! especially when you get huge offers for players! though a few players have stayed with the club through loyalty! le tiss, lallana are 2 for you. if however all you care about in football, which is more like a business these days, is loyalty and having hometown players then you will enjoy poopey being in the blue square! just a quick question, how many of the players in the starting line up for your fa cup `win` were from poopey? i dont care where a player is from, as soon as he puts on the red and white he is a saints player! i do think you need to more out of the 60`s, which being form poopey must be hard!

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

you are so wrong! talk about not following football matters! in the past we had to sell most of our academy players to keep afloat! you see selling players instead of buying keeps a club in the black! especially when you get huge offers for players! though a few players have stayed with the club through loyalty! le tiss, lallana are 2 for you. if however all you care about in football, which is more like a business these days, is loyalty and having hometown players then you will enjoy poopey being in the blue square! just a quick question, how many of the players in the starting line up for your fa cup `win` were from poopey? i dont care where a player is from, as soon as he puts on the red and white he is a saints player! i do think you need to more out of the 60`s, which being form poopey must be hard!

...Not wrong about the majority of decks incorrect assumption that Pompey fans don't want a well run club. Le Tiss was just too scared to go to a bigger club...He should have gone to Chelsea but didn't..I fear Lallana will go at the end of this season, and your club will probably get a good whack for him..More out of the sixties? you mean move on? Pompey has been developing youngsters for a while now, and that is good for progress - quite right..no local lads for the FA win..but we are now improving on that...As a matter of interest how many local lads were in your 76 team?

More Glory wrote:

Strasbourg Saint wrote:

More Glory wrote: Another product from the academy then. Where did this one get poached from - not Pompey then? wow - Kingston upon Thames.... keep trying and you may get some proper home grown boys

What, like Darren Anderton, you mean? Just asking!

we didn't poach him. The experts at your academy just didn't want him...remember...so he went to the next nearest club

saintshorse101 wrote:
Nick Holmes was born in Southampton and educated at St. Mary’s College! local enough for you?
Mick Channon was born in Orcheston, Wiltshire and made his debut for Southampton as a 17 year old in 1966, that quite close!
and of course Bobby Stokes was born down the road, and thats quite close as well!
is that good enough for you?
oh yes there was a typo in my last post and i`m glad you picked it up and mentioned it, though it was you who posted a day or 2 ago that we are all anal about spelling and punctuation on this site! see if you hang out with us long enough you will be converted to our way of thinking and our team! keep them coming!

saintshorse101 wrote:
Nick Holmes was born in Southampton and educated at St. Mary’s College! local enough for you? Mick Channon was born in Orcheston, Wiltshire and made his debut for Southampton as a 17 year old in 1966, that quite close! and of course Bobby Stokes was born down the road, and thats quite close as well! is that good enough for you? oh yes there was a typo in my last post and i`m glad you picked it up and mentioned it, though it was you who posted a day or 2 ago that we are all anal about spelling and punctuation on this site! see if you hang out with us long enough you will be converted to our way of thinking and our team! keep them coming!

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote: Why are you still here then? ..... It’s a jealous skunt thing. THE END

Your'e not stressed are you? You should have seen all the Pompey pages over the last 18 months; full of deck chairs. I've just been here for 3 days. See that is my point; you guys lack patience

EPILOGUE: How old are you fella, you sad juvenile insecure skunt tw*t? Is your life really that lacking, I pity you. Stress is for unhappy people, again I say look in the mirror. Your sad life will be over in a flash, you must strive for more than the poor hand dealt to you that you have so publicly exposed to us all on here.

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:
Why are you still here then? ..... It’s a jealous skunt thing. THE END

Your'e not stressed are you? You should have seen all the Pompey pages over the last 18 months; full of deck chairs. I've just been here for 3 days. See that is my point; you guys lack patience

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote: Why are you still here then? ..... It’s a jealous skunt thing. THE END

Your'e not stressed are you? You should have seen all the Pompey pages over the last 18 months; full of deck chairs. I've just been here for 3 days. See that is my point; you guys lack patience

EPILOGUE: How old are you fella, you sad juvenile insecure skunt tw*t? Is your life really that lacking, I pity you. Stress is for unhappy people, again I say look in the mirror. Your sad life will be over in a flash, you must strive for more than the poor hand dealt to you that you have so publicly exposed to us all on here.

This man is stressed. Come on down to the News site; it's much more relaxing, but you will get attacked harshly by a few idiots for being a deck chair, and then you will realise that the very people attacking you with small minds are actually a bit like you. Truly a reflective mirror and so much more revealing if you stay on for 2 or 3 days.

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: Nick Holmes was born in Southampton and educated at St. Mary’s College! local enough for you? Mick Channon was born in Orcheston, Wiltshire and made his debut for Southampton as a 17 year old in 1966, that quite close! and of course Bobby Stokes was born down the road, and thats quite close as well! is that good enough for you? oh yes there was a typo in my last post and i`m glad you picked it up and mentioned it, though it was you who posted a day or 2 ago that we are all anal about spelling and punctuation on this site! see if you hang out with us long enough you will be converted to our way of thinking and our team! keep them coming!

mentioning things like "anal" again. No; I just mentioned it as more, and move are real actual words, and I thought I would clarify it. I think Bobby stokes at 20 miles can't be called local really. But hey; Nick Holmes, nice bloke but a bit average....No wonder all the deck chairs come on our site, the banter is so much better.

slugger wrote:
just ignore the fool !

angus mc coatup wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote: Why are you still here then? ..... It’s a jealous skunt thing. THE END

Your'e not stressed are you? You should have seen all the Pompey pages over the last 18 months; full of deck chairs. I've just been here for 3 days. See that is my point; you guys lack patience

EPILOGUE: How old are you fella, you sad juvenile insecure skunt tw*t? Is your life really that lacking, I pity you. Stress is for unhappy people, again I say look in the mirror. Your sad life will be over in a flash, you must strive for more than the poor hand dealt to you that you have so publicly exposed to us all on here.

This man is stressed. Come on down to the News site; it's much more relaxing, but you will get attacked harshly by a few idiots for being a deck chair, and then you will realise that the very people attacking you with small minds are actually a bit like you. Truly a reflective mirror and so much more revealing if you stay on for 2 or 3 days.

you can spout all the shlte you like mate but you, me, and everybody else knows the truth.
at this moment saints are simply miles away from your lot.
everything about souhampton compared to pfc is better from the bottom to the top.
now I see the arabs are back sniffing around pfc. we will have to change your name from skunts to skarabs.
or scarabs even.google scarab beetle, it probably sums you up.

OSPREYSAINT wrote:

slugger wrote:
just ignore the fool !

I have tried to, but you keep feeding the troll. Stop it and he will just fade away, just like his team.

City Saint wrote:
Bring on the shaman!

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

dadofmy3sons wrote:
More glory. you don't really do facts do you ? No locals in the team? OK , not exactly from the road outside the ground. The point we make about our youth scheme is that we do encourage young players to come here and improve. This point is proved by the heading of this particular article, we are hoping to bring a very good left back through from our youth team and give him a game in the premiership. When PFC were in the Prem they bought wholesale, we have purchased for the positions that we need better players in. We have a young left back. a centre back and another out on loan to gain experience. On the News site your manager has publicly said that he doesn't have enough good players and needs to borrow money to get some more players, not a good idea with the current situation resulting from borrowing money. You are more than welcome to post on here, please do make sure that what you say is true though, The News site is somewhere that I also post, I post sensible comments and observations and some of the responses I get are similar, but most are just knuckle draggers making ugly noises . I must presume that jealousy is making them irate. Alternatively you could just join up with Pompey Phil who posts garbage and insult and thinks it is witty. It ain't!

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

Jeez, who is this guy?!

saintand266 wrote:
Come on chaps let's not single out specific players for our defeats , there have been valid points about all of our back four in defeats this season but it is a learning curve for them as well as the majority of the side. Let's hope the dressing room attitude is win as a team lose as a team and they do not single out individual players mistakes like we all do on here . Hopefully we can go to the arsenal get something from the game to kick start our season and give the fantastic club and fantastic supporters something positive to talk about on here . Coyr

SaintMax wrote:
I played leftback in the wessex league, and even had David Peach say I had a good game a few times.. so I think I know a bit about the position. For my money a good LB needs to be able to defend first and formost (obviously), positionally support the CB's if they are exposed and work and swap with his fellow left sided players. So far this season Fox has been caught out positionally and his defending has often been questioniable. Yes, the best form of defence is attack but not when you are 2 goals down and your fullback keeps on getting exposed. That only pulls the CBs out of position, and Fonte cant currently cut it in this league. Give Shaw a chance I say.

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

Jeez, who is this guy?!

This guy is rational, intelligent, coherent, articulate, astute, thoughtful and fully supportive of our team. In other words, I engage the brain before posting, try it!

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

Jeez, who is this guy?!

This guy is rational, intelligent, coherent, articulate, astute, thoughtful and fully supportive of our team. In other words, I engage the brain before posting, try it!

I think you suffer from delusions of self-importance, so there's not really any point debating with you.

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

Jeez, who is this guy?!

This guy is rational, intelligent, coherent, articulate, astute, thoughtful and fully supportive of our team. In other words, I engage the brain before posting, try it!

I think you suffer from delusions of self-importance, so there's not really any point debating with you.

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

Jeez, who is this guy?!

This guy is rational, intelligent, coherent, articulate, astute, thoughtful and fully supportive of our team. In other words, I engage the brain before posting, try it!

I think you suffer from delusions of self-importance, so there's not really any point debating with you.

Back of the net!

miltonarcher wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:

miltonarcher wrote:

Sainty saint saint wrote:
Please let this happen - Fox is a liability.

Oh wow! Lets hope NC takes on board your fantastic football knowledge, does he have your mob number? Cos for sure he will be in touch to get you in to replace NA (and maybe the Scottish FA will offer you the managers job) cos both mangers rate Fox. Do you have all of the required coaching badges?

As a matter of fact I do, but that's besides the point.

You, sir, are a silly boy. Can I not express my opinion on a open forum? Christ knows you do enough. I believe that Fox has been the biggest defensive liability this season (even taking into account Jos's two penalties and Fonte's dodgy moments) - may I have your permission to say that?

Are you in the know with Craig Levein? Has he told you personally he rates Fox? Or does he pick him because there isn't really anyone else?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Christ, why should people accept your opinion on stuff any more than mine, oh wise one?

Because I dont spout stupid comments like "Fox IS a liability" On that basis, so is the whole of our defence.

He did well for Scotland actually, and has also played well for us. Still, I guess I will have to bow to your superior knowledge and accept that after just 3 games you have written him off.

Oh jesus, we're talking semantics here. Perhaps I should have worded it "Fox HAS BEEN a liability in the first 3 games" so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

I have not written him off, I just meant to express that it is my opinion that he has been the weakest defensive link thusfar in the three premiership games we have played. I just couldn't be bothered to write a long post originally.

Get over yourself.

Mmmmm,hit a nerve methinks. You have made yourself look a bit of a numptie old son by listing the defensive frailties of our centre backs, then claiming Fox was the weak link! Don’t forget the slip by Clyne that let in RVP. Are they all a liability? Get over yourself for pities sake and try and consider things carefully before blurting out irrational opinions. Glad to have been of help to you.

Jeez, who is this guy?!

This guy is rational, intelligent, coherent, articulate, astute, thoughtful and fully supportive of our team. In other words, I engage the brain before posting, try it!

I think you suffer from delusions of self-importance, so there's not really any point debating with you.

Back of the net!

Fox, first (liability) to score against the Gunners this season!!

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

More Glory wrote:

Don-Irelando wrote:

saintshorse101 wrote: so if we are not bashing guly (no pun intended!) we will have a go at fox! what happens if shaw is not up to the job and gets done over by the arse? will we say its only his first game? we can forgive him cause he`s young? or nige was wrong to pick him! as i said before on another post, all teams have great players and all teams have less good players! singling out players for criticism will never help the TEAM win and can only do harm to morale! yes we all know where are problems are but if we tried to get behind the team instead for a change who know what might happen!!!

agreed

Like I said the other day. The posters on these message boards do have hidden undercurrents ie " reminds me of Ivan Golac when he first came" or "what happens if young Shaw gets done over by the arse" or " "so if we are not bashing guly"...and I've only looked at ten posts or so..

Size of a skunt micro pen1s .... Rozan Kobar!!! Keep looking, you may find other gems to brighten and educate your day. Talking of undercurrents you turd, float on before the tide goes out

Thanks. You have just illustrated my point about obsessing about bodily parts. By the way ; turds all generally sink after a short duration; and I think if you can get some flying carpets in, it would really help out with the teams abysmal defence this year.

Glad to help. Sinking turds and flying carpets, ah yes. Does that mean you are a fan of the Fake Sheik re-taking over the skint scummers at Farton? Anyway, I’m bored of you already as I suspect you are just an attention seeker rather than a footy fan.

See that's your problem. You are bore of me already, and yet I may be able to really give you an alternative view on things as an outsider. I hear this "I am bored" thing quite a bit ; and I fear that this overwhelming quick surge into boredom from your township means that you get bored too quickly with your footy team, thus ensuring that you then turn on the team and continually make the team nervous and then ultimately "also rans". It's only my observation, but I do think I could be onto something here.

morning glory, you are an idiot! you think any saints fan on here cares what drivel you post? no we dont! but just for you! you claim that we are `obsessed with body parts` wrong! 1 post out of 50 odd. you though are constantly posting about saints not having any `home town boys` in the squad, well as saints has one of the best academys in the country, no world, kids and their parents want to come here to learn, the best of these then have a chance of playing for the first team,no mater where they have been born, how is that poaching players? and how can you poach anyone who has not signed a contract? i know it must be hard for a skate to comprehend how a decent club works and how the academy system aids in the running of the club by getting in those youngsters, playing the best and then selling if needed for big fees. thats the saints way! the poopey way, spend huge fees and wages (you cant afford) on over rated players to `win` 1 fa cup! and dont bother investing in the youth or stadium. thats not worked out too well has it? so now you are so much debt that if some one turns up at the training ground with some boots, they might get a game! thats why you have `local home town boys` in your squad! not cause you want to but because you have no choice numbnuts! and as for turds sinking after a while you are right look how far poopey have sunk!

You obviously don't follow football matters. All the homegrown lads were in place well before the administration. Nice to see some passion though. Most fans want an academy and to get rid of the crooks; so as usual for a deck chair you are out of touch with the real Pompey fans. It is a serious point though in't it? Your best young players will keep leaving beacuse they have no real allegiance to the club or the town. That is my point and none of you guys have acknowledged it..

you are so wrong! talk about not following football matters! in the past we had to sell most of our academy players to keep afloat! you see selling players instead of buying keeps a club in the black! especially when you get huge offers for players! though a few players have stayed with the club through loyalty! le tiss, lallana are 2 for you. if however all you care about in football, which is more like a business these days, is loyalty and having hometown players then you will enjoy poopey being in the blue square! just a quick question, how many of the players in the starting line up for your fa cup `win` were from poopey? i dont care where a player is from, as soon as he puts on the red and white he is a saints player! i do think you need to more out of the 60`s, which being form poopey must be hard!

...Not wrong about the majority of decks incorrect assumption that Pompey fans don't want a well run club. Le Tiss was just too scared to go to a bigger club...He should have gone to Chelsea but didn't..I fear Lallana will go at the end of this season, and your club will probably get a good whack for him..More out of the sixties? you mean move on? Pompey has been developing youngsters for a while now, and that is good for progress - quite right..no local lads for the FA win..but we are now improving on that...As a matter of interest how many local lads were in your 76 team?