West Ham winger to miss Saints clash

RICARDO VAZ TE RICARDO VAZ TE

West Ham winger Ricardo Vaz Te will is set for a three-month spell on the sidelines as he recuperates from shoulder surgery - starting with Saints' visit to Upton Park this weekend.

The Portuguese dislocated his shoulder in the Hammers' last Barclays Premier League encounter against Arsenal ten days ago.

It was decided keyhole surgery would be the best treatment, with Vaz Te undergoing the operation last night.

Boss Sam Allardyce told the club's official website: "We think we've chosen the best option to strengthen the shoulder and get him back as quickly as we can."

Vaz Te's absence gives West Ham's fringe midfielders a chance to prove their worth.

"We've got some good players ready to step up in place. Matt Taylor has been there and there are others in the squad that haven't quite played as much such as Gary O'Neil," Allardyce added.

"Whichever option we pick it's up to them to step up to the mark. They need to provide the attacking opportunities that we need."

Meanwhile, West Ham have allowed goalkeeper Stephen Henderson to join Ipswich on loan, the npower Championship club have confirmed.

The 24-year-old stopper trained with his new team-mates for two days before signing a three-month deal this afternoon.

Henderson told Ipswich's official website: "I've not played much football this season so when I was told I could go out on loan, my agent contacted Ipswich and once I knew they wanted me, that was it."

Town boss Paul Jewell added: "We're delighted to have Stephen here and he will add to the competition we have in the goalkeeping areas."

Henderson started his career at Bristol City in 2007 before joining Portsmouth in the summer of 2011, where his impressive performances attracted West Ham's attention.

He moved to Upton Park on loan in March before signing a three-year deal with the Hammers in the summer.

Comments(19)

Alicesdad says...
5:37pm Tue 16 Oct 12

First. Oh the excitement !!

Velleity says...
5:46pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Foiled again

Velleity says...
5:47pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Curses, Alicesdad, you beat me once more.

I'll get you!

Velleity says...
5:51pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.

mack chinnon says...
6:00pm Tue 16 Oct 12

He,s a good player and seems to work well with Andy Carrol. I think they will miss him.

warrens 76 says...
6:24pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!

warrens 76 says...
6:25pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!

Velleity says...
6:39pm Tue 16 Oct 12

warrens 76 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!
I believe, given every single post you've ever made, that being tediously negative is an innate trait for you.

ghk230473 says...
7:20pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Velleity wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!
I believe, given every single post you've ever made, that being tediously negative is an innate trait for you.
Valleity you really are a bore

slugger says...
8:20pm Tue 16 Oct 12

good , arrogant berk !

OSPREYSAINT says...
8:52pm Tue 16 Oct 12

ghk230473 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!
I believe, given every single post you've ever made, that being tediously negative is an innate trait for you.
Valleity you really are a bore
That's easy for you to say, you are a master at the craft.

OSPREYSAINT says...
8:53pm Tue 16 Oct 12

Just waiting for the synchronised swimming team to do their stuff in Warsaw.

warrens 76 says...
9:59pm Tue 16 Oct 12

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Just waiting for the synchronised swimming team to do their stuff in Warsaw.
I think you must be confusing me with someone else sunshine, I love my team just not blind to our faults or a bit of banter, what side of bed did you get out of though..

warrens 76 says...
10:00pm Tue 16 Oct 12

warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Just waiting for the synchronised swimming team to do their stuff in Warsaw.
I think you must be confusing me with someone else sunshine, I love my team just not blind to our faults or a bit of banter, what side of bed did you get out of though..
Osprey, my post was for Misery aka Velleity...apologies
.

Velleity says...
10:16pm Tue 16 Oct 12

ghk230473 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!
I believe, given every single post you've ever made, that being tediously negative is an innate trait for you.
Valleity you really are a bore
Takes one to know one, Ducky

Velleity says...
10:17pm Tue 16 Oct 12

warrens 76 wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Just waiting for the synchronised swimming team to do their stuff in Warsaw.
I think you must be confusing me with someone else sunshine, I love my team just not blind to our faults or a bit of banter, what side of bed did you get out of though..
Osprey, my post was for Misery aka Velleity...apologies

.
No need to apologise, really. Don't get all het up about it, I forgive you.

OSPREYSAINT says...
11:17pm Tue 16 Oct 12

warrens 76 wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Just waiting for the synchronised swimming team to do their stuff in Warsaw.
I think you must be confusing me with someone else sunshine, I love my team just not blind to our faults or a bit of banter, what side of bed did you get out of though..
Osprey, my post was for Misery aka Velleity...apologies

.
lol my joke probably deserved a rebuke anyway, the mongs are mostly missing tonight, can't find anyone to annoy.

Strasbourg Saint says...
9:10am Wed 17 Oct 12

Velleity wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the story, I'm sure NA will have been doing a little work with the defence (and getting the midfield to help the defence rather than just abandoning them) so we'd have neutralised him anyway.

With him gone, we're on track for a result.
I believe judging from our goals conceded that your comment"NA will have been doing a 'little' work with the defence" was purely accidental!
I believe, given every single post you've ever made, that being tediously negative is an innate trait for you.
Velleity, you're the master of past posts (I'm certainly not) but, as Warrens76 says below, I think you're muddling him up with someone else. He's far from a negative.

Anyway, I think our defence will miss Vaz Te; they like a challenge. Then again, if Carroll plays ........

Maybe Nigel could stick a few barrage balloons up in the penalty box to deal with the aerial bombardment.

OSPREYSAINT says...
7:41pm Wed 17 Oct 12

They will miss Vaz Te but not as much as we will suffer from the absence of Ramirez.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree