Why create an attraction that will harm those who have most to lose?

If I were a gambling man, which I am not, I would put my money on Southampton City Council regretting its backing for a super casino.
As this paper reports this week, Southampton has finally given the green light to the creation of just such a pleasure palace.
In fact it has had the ability to grant the go-ahead for sometime, having been chosen as one of only eight cities throughout the country where such premises can be sited.
Southampton is actually the last of those on the list to get around to setting out what would-be developers would have to do to win the licence, behind the likes of Hull, Milton Keynes, Leeds and Great Yarmouth.
Quite why it has taken so long for the city to get its act together we can put down to a mixture of changes in administration, and perhaps a reluctance to take the lead. After all, there is a risk here.
In a poll undertaken by this paper four years ago just 52 per cent of readers were actually in favour of the super casino plan.
It’s not hard to understand why there is concern in a lot of quarters. Gambling as such carries a stigma, no matter how exciting the premises where it is being staged.
Then there is the sort of tourist such attractions draw in to the city.
And finally, and the part that surprises me the most, gambling is recognised to cause the greatest harm for those who ca least afford it – the local working class population.
That it is a Labour administration that is pushing through the proposals I find eyebrow-raising.
I can only surmise that the report carried out by the council that concluded a new super casino would bring £11m-a-year into the city’s economy swayed doubters. But is that figure, welcome as it is, worth bringing so much potential misery?
Of course some might say, and no doubt will, that as we already have three casinos in Southampton where is the problem? To which I would say, well, isn’t three enough?

Comments(2)

userds5050 says...
11:38am Fri 28 Sep 12

Not sure why eyebrows are raised at a Labour administration pushing this through. It was the Labour government that originally introduced the super casino licenses. It was only later that Brown did a U turn, trying to regain the moral high from the Torys and their 'Broken Britain' manifesto. Aspers in Stratford is the only super casino as well to actually come to fruition, so we're hardly lagging behind everyone else. Final point, we now have only two casinos in the city as Harbour house has been shut for a while, so isn't two enough?

Paramjit Bahia says...
12:58pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Since when Editor Ian Murray has become a true socialist and concerned about working class?

How long this conversion to Marxism will last?

Hope with his new found compassion for working class he will start paying decent wage to NUJ member hacks!

Perhaps it is only part of upper class's hypocrisy for making those whom their Tory friends don't like look bad.

Personally speaking I won't complain because it is the fact that Dear Leader led NuLabourites are no better than the Tories, in fact for those who have lost Oaklands Pool and jobs they are even worse.

Who will gain out of £11million Super Casino, which is expected to be poured into Southampton?

It won't be the ordinary people, but more than likely will be the owners of the business and their friends.

If money coming into city is the only attraction then will prostitution and drug dealing also be considered as more options by Conservatised NuLabour? I hope not

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree