Cyclists who have no consideration

I RECENTLY stayed at my son’s house in Hamble and walked from the Tesco store down to Coronation Parade most days. But what I want to say is the people on pushbikes have no consideration at all and it’s adults!

I was so shocked to see how fast they go with no intention of slowing down. I think I would have been safer on the main road, it’s really shocking. They have finished work and are crazy, just wanting to get home at any cost.

MRS J DERRICK, Eastleigh.

Comments(11)

meandher says...
9:49am Wed 4 Jul 12

And what about the cyclists that continue to cycle through the pedestrian areas of the city,i;e,shirley,dis
pite there being warning notices on the lamp posts that they could be fined for doing so,although these signs are high up on the lamposts,so i guess the excuse would be,"I DIDN'T SEE IT".I witness this on a daily basis but nothing seems to be done about this continual problem,what will it take before action is taken ?

Linesman says...
10:14am Wed 4 Jul 12

They make up their own rules, and then bellyache that they are given no consideration.

Traffic lights are just illuminations as far as some of them are concerned, and pedestrian crossings are used to ride on instead of walk.

They cause more accidents than enough, but precious few of them bother with insurance.

Fieldbean says...
10:45am Wed 4 Jul 12

Well if car drivers were a bit more considerate cyclists would be more than happy to be safely on the road peddling down the fast lane. Car drivers queue too close to the kerb or line of parked cars. Often they over take cyclists, only to cut the rider up twenty metres further on or drive far too close to the rider.

I know I dare say most of the cyclists drive cars aswell, but at least they have experienced the fear at first hand from city traffic.

I am not convinced that it is cyclists causing most accidents. There are thousands of casualties on the roads because of cars, many of them pedestrians. I would say there are only a handful of casualties where a cyclist has injured a pedestrian or caused a car to crash.

downfader says...
3:17pm Wed 4 Jul 12

And yet if we use the road here (I have experience of this) we get beeped at and told to get on the "perfectly good cyclepath"

The paving is often too narrow for bikes and pedestrians, but this is the Hants County Council approach. What they should have done is reduced the speed of traffic, changed the speed limit along the whole stretch to 30mph.

Put yourself on a bike and try and navigate some of these areas before bellyaching.

And Linesman, you know the figures, I gave them to you last time iirc.

Cyclestrian says...
3:29pm Wed 4 Jul 12

Cyclists are on the pavement, legally or not, in response to poor infrastructure and lawless roads.

Who really wants to ride on the pavement, stopping at every minor road and dodging unpredictable pedestrians?

http://cottenhamcycl
ist.blogspot.co.uk/2
012/06/punks-on-bike
s.html

downfader says...
3:41pm Wed 4 Jul 12

Incidentally said route:

http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=3-HJc-tXy
vs

I made that 3 years ago. When I rode it on Sunday morning it is in worse condition, a few signs missing, no clear markings on the ground at all now.

And far too narrow to get anywhere within a decent time frame. Remember, cyclists travel slower than drivers, but if the road was built with such start-stop problems people would be on the street with placards.

geoff51 says...
4:16pm Wed 4 Jul 12

I see the usual whinging idiots in Stupid Lycra are defending their undefendable attitude about terrorising the pedestrians who are legally using the pavements.
and alsoi got my first comment deleted as it did not fit their narrow opinion, so I shall repeat it
Was the Idiot on the bike wearing Lycra if so it was either Downdrafter or Toegreen

downfader says...
4:52pm Wed 4 Jul 12

geoff51 wrote:
I see the usual whinging idiots in Stupid Lycra are defending their undefendable attitude about terrorising the pedestrians who are legally using the pavements.
and alsoi got my first comment deleted as it did not fit their narrow opinion, so I shall repeat it
Was the Idiot on the bike wearing Lycra if so it was either Downdrafter or Toegreen
So again, you have nothing constructive to add.

I and others have explained several times why these conflicts occur. And this is a shared-use path

geoff51 says...
7:51pm Wed 4 Jul 12

Stop trying to run pedestrians down, flaunting the rules then I and many others might have a little more respect for you. I am still waiting for your constructive ides that we can both debate

downfader says...
9:08pm Wed 4 Jul 12

geoff51 wrote:
Stop trying to run pedestrians down, flaunting the rules then I and many others might have a little more respect for you. I am still waiting for your constructive ides that we can both debate
So you're accusing me of running pedestrians down? Thats really helping the debate isnt it.

geoff51 says...
9:14pm Wed 4 Jul 12

downfader wrote:
geoff51 wrote:
Stop trying to run pedestrians down, flaunting the rules then I and many others might have a little more respect for you. I am still waiting for your constructive ides that we can both debate
So you're accusing me of running pedestrians down? Thats really helping the debate isnt it.
Maybe not you personally but as you have elected yourself as the spokesman for the cycling minority I am sure you will be only too happoy to educate your buddies in the correct way to ride a bicycle on the ROADS

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree