PLANS for a car-free day in Southampton have been branded “damaging for the local economy and too radical”.

Southampton Itchen MP Royston Smith said civic chiefs should look at other measures that would tackle air pollution as a car-free day would push people to go shopping in Winchester or Portsmouth.

Mr Smith said the idea of a car-free day is a good idea and is impressive but he added that its practicality makes it difficult and would disadvantage people living and working in Southampton.

Daily Echo:

Civic chiefs hit back saying no decisions have been made yet and stressed they are exploring  the idea at this stage.

The news comes after members of Clean Air Southampton and Southampton Friends of the Earth suggested the idea to Southampton City Council (SCC) earlier this year.

Last week the authority confirmed it is looking at the possibility of a car-free day.

City bosses said they hope to trial it this year but said they are in the early stages of planning and working out how a car-free day will be delivered.

READ MORE:

'Is that how you would like your loved ones to find out something had happened to you?': Angry police hit out at people taking photos of M27 bridge incident >>>
Van hits trees after crashing off the M3 >>>
These are the roads which will be closed for Southampton Marathon this weekend >>>

Now Mr Smith is urging them to look at different options that would help reduce pollution and said a park-and-ride would work better than a car-free day.

He added: “I think it’s too radical. There’s lots of things they can do which are better and more practical. I welcome suggestions about cutting congestion and emissions but Southampton cannot act in isolation.I would suggest the council deal with some of the hot spots for standing and idling traffic, which would yield more sustainable benefits, before doing something so radical.”

He said a car-free day would only work if the entire country would go car free on the same day so that none of the cities will be penalised.

Mr Smith also said the initiative would be costly and added that publicising it to raise awareness will be a challenge.

“They are going to lose a lot of parking revenue and so they’ve got to pay for it. Where’s the money coming from? How much is going to cost just the closure of the roads? Who is policing that? It is so complicated and so costly,” he added.

As reported, campaigners said the initiative has proved successful in other cities with a positive impact on the local economy.

GO Southampton, the city’s BID (Business Improvement District), also backed the proposal.

Following Mr Smith’s comment, councillor Jacqui Rayment, cabinet member for environment and transport, stressed that no decisions have been made and said there are pros and cons and all of them will need to be addressed.

Council leader Chris Hammond added: “This is just an idea we’re exploring at this stage. Sadly, this is the typical knee-jerk reaction we get from our Itchen MP. He agrees that we need to tackle air pollution, yet comes out strongly against anything which the council considers doing which might do that.”