In response to your correspondents letter it should be remembered that it was during Palmerston's spell at the Foreign office ( 1846 -51) that he developed the high- handed blustering diplomacy , filled with patriotic prejudice, with which his name is generally associated.
With regard to his backing the Confederates in the American Civil War.
It should be noted that the Confederacy comprised five and a half million whites and three and a half million slaves.
The Confederate States framed a constitution based on the US Constitution but stressing the independent character of each state and making specific reference to the institution of slavery.
How could Palmerston possibly defend his backing of the Confederacy?
Black lives matter and I find it inconceivable that anyone should condone his appalling blunders and prejudice.
Jeremy Travell
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel