What health inspectors found at Premier League football grounds

Mice, uncooked chicken and out of date turkey are just some of the hygiene nasties that health inspectors have discovered at Premier League football grounds.

The two most recent environmental reports from teams in the top tier of English football have revealed some surprising findings.

An inspection of Manchester United's stadium Old Trafford discovered that the club has previously had to deal with the presence of rodents.

The report, which also found a broken tap and flaking pipework, instructed them to "continue to monitor and react to the mouse activity".

At St Mary’s Stadium, home of the Saints, Southampton were instructed to clean one of their ceilings, refill a soap dispenser and sort out a gap in a floor which provided potential access for pests.

The information, which was obtained through Freedom of Information requests, also highlighted some other interesting discoveries.

Swansea City were guilty of serving ready cooked chicken that was still pink, leaving an open packet of ham in a kitchen and allowing some pate to go out of date.

At Fulham's ground, Craven Cottage, an open box of bread rolls was left out under a wash basin, while Reading FC were told to clean out the dead insects and cobwebs in a drinks area.

But for many other teams in the league, such as Aston Villa, Wigan, QPR and West Ham, it was just smaller issues such as temperature control and general cleaning that were highlighted.

And reigning champions Manchester City were given top marks, with the inspector writing there was "very good hygiene standards in place".

In response to the report Manchester United said they had a "robust pest control system" and that if any incidents do occur they take "immediate and appropriate action".

HOW THE CLUBS FARED:

Arsenal - The London club scored top marks with inspectors with no contraventions of legislation witnessed;

Aston Villa - The Villains were picked up on maintaining temperature control, a lack of water being provided to certain units and a leaking drain pipe;

Chelsea - Health inspectors detailed how out of date turkey saddles were almost served, how frozen pies were not correctly labelled and also expressed concerns about the sale stockpot. But it seems the warning was taken, as a follow up inspection recorded hygiene being generally excellent;

Everton - High standards of food hygiene and safety were noted by the inspectors;

Fulham - Areas of concern shared with Fulham included an open box of bread rolls under a basin, a hole in a wall which could have given access to pests, and a pair of rusty scissors;

Liverpool - Like their Merseyside neighbours, Liverpool showed good standards and procedures;

Manchester City - The Premier League champions were noted for their very good standards and no action was required;

Manchester Utd - The Red Devils were criticised for flaking paintwork and concerns were raised about the presence of rodents, with the report instructing the club to continue to monitor and react to the mouse activity;

Newcastle United - No problems were discovered by inspectors at St James's Park with good standards observed;

Norwich City - no response;

Queens Park Rangers - A few minor problems were found at Loftus Road such as a few loose taps, no hot water to a hand basin and low lighting in certain areas;

Reading - Health inspectors found dead insects and cobwebs at the Madejski Stadium, which they instructed the club to clean away, as well as a hole in a ceiling and rubbish behind the PG Tips table;

Southampton - Southampton were instructed to clean one of their ceilings, refill a soap dispenser and sort out a gap in a floor which provided potential access for pests;

Stoke City - The Potters were told to clean a dirty vacuum packer and take action on some pouches for vacuum packing that were stored in a dirty box;

Sunderland - The inspection found the Stadium of Light to comply with hygiene and food legislation;

Swansea City - Some of the issues highlighted by the reports included chicken being served that was still pink, out of date watercress, out of date pate and an open packet of cooked ham left in a kitchen;

Tottenham Hotspur - Tottenham scored well in the report with food hygiene being recorded as well managed; ::

West Bromwich Albion - Top marks for West Brom as hygiene standards were recorded as being very high;

West Ham United - Not many problems were discovered at Upton Park with inspectors just instructing some extractor filters to be cleaned and to replace a missing ceiling tile;

Wigan Athletic - High standards were noted at Wigan with the report just telling them to ensure temperatures were recorded properly.

Comments(23)

manimaul says...
8:56am Sun 13 Jan 13

Concrete blocks across all three lanes should help then.

forest hump says...
9:59am Sun 13 Jan 13

Better standards than some of the animals that frequent these places!

Costa Baz says...
10:50am Sun 13 Jan 13

Lucky they didn't go to Fratton Park, where there would have been reports of rats leaving a sinking ship.

Just another reader says...
10:54am Sun 13 Jan 13

If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times.
If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain.
Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.

PlymouthSAINT123 says...
11:18am Sun 13 Jan 13

Don't forget St Marys is used for functions etc so not just on average once a fortnight. Considering how many thousand people they cater for I don't think Southampton have done to bad. I can't fault them when I buy food from there its football not a top class resturant quick pie and beer in the concourse keeps me happy

peachy1 says...
11:19am Sun 13 Jan 13

I think this report is inaccurate I have been to some grounds and you just know what your going to get is a lottery of whether it's going to get you

I saw rats pitch side at Birmingham city told the steward he said they were the subs warming up lol

WECOMING4U says...
11:42am Sun 13 Jan 13

Extinct skate best served cold

MGRA says...
11:43am Sun 13 Jan 13

Just another reader wrote:
If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times.
If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain.
Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.
spot on.... the standard of food sold is also extremely poor almost everywhere.... The Rose bowl is not perfect but the food there is lights years ahead of anything I have ever eaten at a footy ground... Having said that, SMS is amongst the best .

sotonman2012 says...
1:00pm Sun 13 Jan 13

When I used to work at St Mary's as catering assistant the condition of the kitchen was always excellent that was under the compass group,Not sure if they still remain the main contracters there or not.Northam was always the worst concourse food kiosk simply as that attracted a different sort of supporter,I'm sure it remains that way now.

Just another reader says...
1:22pm Sun 13 Jan 13

PlymouthSAINT123 wrote:
Don't forget St Marys is used for functions etc so not just on average once a fortnight. Considering how many thousand people they cater for I don't think Southampton have done to bad. I can't fault them when I buy food from there its football not a top class resturant quick pie and beer in the concourse keeps me happy
That's only the main kitchen that gets used, I refer to the multiple bars and food serveries that are below the stands. After all these are what 'fans' get to eat from at the match.

Just another reader says...
1:24pm Sun 13 Jan 13

And yes, I'm more than happy with what's available and the quality, but its hugely overpriced.

thinklikealocal says...
2:13pm Sun 13 Jan 13

MGRA wrote:
Just another reader wrote: If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times. If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain. Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.
spot on.... the standard of food sold is also extremely poor almost everywhere.... The Rose bowl is not perfect but the food there is lights years ahead of anything I have ever eaten at a footy ground... Having said that, SMS is amongst the best .
Sorry don't agree. I think the choice and quality of food sold at St M is appalling. Have been to footie grounds all over the country and almost always better. Coventry fabulous. I choose not to buy at the ground but regret that it appears to be a great commercial opportunity being 'lost', surprised too considering the Chairman's relentless business mantra.

mickey01 says...
3:24pm Sun 13 Jan 13

its not the food at st marys but the watered beer that should be looked at and if they could give the staff an english phrase book that may help too

MGRA says...
4:11pm Sun 13 Jan 13

thinklikealocal wrote:
MGRA wrote:
Just another reader wrote: If you consider that most of these food outlets are used on average once a fortnight they should be spotless at all times. If these inspectors did their jobs half the grounds in the lower leagues wouldn't be allowed to sell food, Crystal Palace was disgusting as were many of the other "facilities" that we went to over the last few years. Colchester was very clean though, but it is a relatively new ground so should be easier to maintain. Cleanliness is next to godliness, a bit of soap and water costs nearly nothing.
spot on.... the standard of food sold is also extremely poor almost everywhere.... The Rose bowl is not perfect but the food there is lights years ahead of anything I have ever eaten at a footy ground... Having said that, SMS is amongst the best .
Sorry don't agree. I think the choice and quality of food sold at St M is appalling. Have been to footie grounds all over the country and almost always better. Coventry fabulous. I choose not to buy at the ground but regret that it appears to be a great commercial opportunity being 'lost', surprised too considering the Chairman's relentless business mantra.
hotdogs are pricey but ok, burgers are garbage, pies are ok sometimes ... had a lot worse than the food at SMS....

three halves says...
4:27pm Sun 13 Jan 13

All the food and drinks at football grounds is a rip off just like the ticket prices epecially in the premier league

J.P.M says...
4:36pm Sun 13 Jan 13

three halves wrote:
All the food and drinks at football grounds is a rip off just like the ticket prices epecially in the premier league
Spot-on.

Thread closed.

SPIKEISLANDTRADER says...
4:58pm Sun 13 Jan 13

Costa Baz wrote:
Lucky they didn't go to Fratton Park, where there would have been reports of rats leaving a sinking ship.
Oh the vermin in Fratton let alone the stench of boneless SKATE . Bet its Cccrawling . Soon to be demolished though so NO WORRY

Linesman says...
5:04pm Sun 13 Jan 13

Considering that St Marys is virtually a brand new stadium, I think that it is cause for concern.

As has been said, it has conference facilities which would be in frequent use, bringing money into the club.

This money should be used to ensure that there is a regular maintenance programme to make sure that, when these facilites are inspected, they pass with flying colours.

Nicole23 says...
5:23pm Sun 13 Jan 13

I wonder what they would find at Pompey?Doesn't bear thinking about.

Linesman says...
7:06pm Sun 13 Jan 13

Nicole23 wrote:
I wonder what they would find at Pompey?Doesn't bear thinking about.
With the age of Fratton Park, there would be more excuse.

good-gosh says...
7:51pm Sun 13 Jan 13

It’s a good job they didn’t inspect my local park.

derek james says...
9:59pm Sun 13 Jan 13

with the money you would have to pay for"refreshents" at a football ground you would expect the highest quality

CHARLIE TAYLOR says...
10:20am Mon 14 Jan 13

All in all excellant results ! nothing to serious, no real health risk, have the press nothing better to report about !!!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree