Councils slammed for not providing enough childcare for working parents

More than two thirds of councils are failing to ensure enough childcare is provided for working parents, campaigners for families' rights have warned.

Just one in five local authorities have enough childcare for parents with children under two, and one in three for school age children, the Daycare Trust and Family and Parenting Institute said.

And just one in seven have enough childcare for disabled children - a figure which has not improved in five years, the charity said.

The research follows recently published Department for Work and Pensions figures that showed a third of parents who want to work more cannot because they are unable to find affordable childcare.

Daycare Trust and Family and Parenting Institute chief executive Anand Shukla said: "Councils across England and Wales are failing families by presiding over a continuing shortage of high quality, affordable childcare."

He added: "Local authorities have a legal duty to ensure a sufficient supply of childcare in their areas, but no doubt their failure to do so is linked to the tight financial squeeze they find themselves in, with ever more austere funding settlements.

"Only the Government can address this situation by investing more in providing support for parents."

The charity's Childcare Costs Survey 2013 also contains evidence suggesting that plans to increase the number of pre-school children that nurseries and childminders can look after will have little impact on childcare costs.

As part of coalition efforts to cut childcare costs, staff are to be able to take charge of six two-year-olds rather than four while the ratio for under-ones will go up from three to four.

But childcare costs for three and four year olds are just 1.9% lower than childcare for under twos, the Daycare Trust and Family and Parenting Institute said.

The charity said the planned changes are likely to exacerbate differences in quality that affect low income groups.

Providers in the most disadvantaged areas are reliant on funding from local authorities, which are increasingly struggling to adequately fund childcare.

As a result, it is children from low income families who are most likely to receive care from providers using the lowest ratios.

Mr Shukla said: "Staffing costs are only part of a complicated picture, so allowing adults to look after more children at once is not only a risky idea, but an ineffective one too.

"With private and non-profit childcare providers exposed to the full force of a harsh business economy, we doubt whether parents will ever see any of the money saved by cutting nursery staff."

Britain has some of the highest childcare costs in the world, meaning many mothers with two or more children find it does not make financial sense to work.

Ministers have still not finalised a much heralded wider shake-up of childcare funding and tax breaks.

The charity's study will be published on March 6.

A Government spokesman said: "Many parents are concerned about childcare costs.

"We are reforming the childcare system so that providers have more flexibility when they have highly qualified staff and childminders are better supported. Ratio changes, which are not compulsory, will allow providers to have the flexibility to increase pay for better qualified workers.

"High quality providers will be able to expand and more childminders will enter the market - this will mean parents have more affordable childcare .

"Ofsted will be the only arbiter of quality, removing any council duplication. As a result more taxpayers' money will go to the frontline.

"We want to help working families with costs and accessibility, and will make an announcement soon."

Comments(10)

Maine Lobster says...
9:41am Sun 3 Mar 13

I would be lovely to have easy access to cheap child care but the reality is that the running costs of these operations are high. Minimum staff ratio numbers to children and high standards of scrutiny, whilst right and proper are also expensive. Councils are not required to provide these services and struggle on reducing government grant to provide the services that are statutory, let alone the services that would be nice to have. If they were provided, it would innevitably mean higher Council Tax and we all know people will moan endlessly about that. In the end the private sector takes up this role and they want to make a profit. That is part of the reason costs are so high. It is extremely unlikely that situation will change given these ongoing conditions.

eurogordi says...
12:14pm Sun 3 Mar 13

Let's be controversial here! It is not the duty of the council to provide childcare facilities other than that which falls within statutory education.

If you choose to have children, you choose to either not work or choose to pay for your own childcare. Too many people want a career AND children ... and want someone else to make all the arrangements for childcare.

My three children all had the benefit of one parent being at home from when they were born until their teenage years. It was a struggle financially at times, but looking at the adults they now are I am more than sure it was worth it.

befriendly says...
2:40pm Sun 3 Mar 13

These days to many people want to much done for them cheaply or completely free. When my wife and i decided to have children many years ago she gave up work to care for them. Then when she wanted to start work again she took a part time job where she started very early and was able to be home in time to take them to school. It was hard for us to make ends meet but we survived. Now they want the tax payer to look after their children through subsidies while they bring home two full time wages. They want the money and they want the children, but their not prepared to make any sacrifices. I want, I want, I want at some one else s expense

Huffter says...
7:41pm Sun 3 Mar 13

Parents should look after their children - not work.

lentil_curry says...
7:51pm Sun 3 Mar 13

One of the reasons our economy is such a mess comes down to the "want it all" mentality and greed. I chose to stay home with my children when they were small. Yes - money was tight, but you cannot put a value on raising a family.
I just don't understand why people have children, then farm them out to be raised by strangers...... The reason unemployment is so high is because two parents work - the reason house prices are so high is again because two parents work outside the home.
I do not see why the government should provide "affordable daycare". When you have children, you make sacrifices. How do we expect our kids to learn if we don't lead by example?

cantthinkofone says...
8:00pm Sun 3 Mar 13

It would also be nice if council run schools allowed working parents to be involved in their children's schools.

Schools repeatedly bleat that they want parents to get involved. And then schedule all the relevant meetings for half three in the afternoon.

If they want parents with professions and careers to contribute to their schools, they may want to consider arranging such things for after the working day ends for people that aren't teachers.


rugbybiker says...
8:14pm Sun 3 Mar 13

lentil_curry wrote:
One of the reasons our economy is such a mess comes down to the "want it all" mentality and greed. I chose to stay home with my children when they were small. Yes - money was tight, but you cannot put a value on raising a family.
I just don't understand why people have children, then farm them out to be raised by strangers...... The reason unemployment is so high is because two parents work - the reason house prices are so high is again because two parents work outside the home.
I do not see why the government should provide "affordable daycare". When you have children, you make sacrifices. How do we expect our kids to learn if we don't lead by example?
I'm sorry but i can't quite see what your trying to get at? Your saying all the problems are because 2 parents work?? The economy is better off if both parents work as that household has more money to spend, or is that too complicated for you to see? I have a 10 month old daughter and i work more than full time ie 60 hrs a week, and my fiancee has just gone back to work part time and we have worked it so her shifts are on my days off or before my night shifts or after my day shifts. That way we can afford the things we want and are not a burden on society like all the households where no one works, who are actually not contributing anything to society or the economy. I agree that if the council was to provide these services they would b used thus making the council a lot of money as Private care is not worth it, charging upwards of £48 a day! I suggest you get in the real world and see the households with both parents working are actually the ones helping the economy to recover!!

derek james says...
10:15pm Sun 3 Mar 13

lentil_curry wrote:
One of the reasons our economy is such a mess comes down to the "want it all" mentality and greed. I chose to stay home with my children when they were small. Yes - money was tight, but you cannot put a value on raising a family.
I just don't understand why people have children, then farm them out to be raised by strangers...... The reason unemployment is so high is because two parents work - the reason house prices are so high is again because two parents work outside the home.
I do not see why the government should provide "affordable daycare". When you have children, you make sacrifices. How do we expect our kids to learn if we don't lead by example?
the reason house prices are so high is uncontrolled immigration and houses snapped up by buy-to-letters, the same again for unemployment,probabl
y another contrbutor to the high cost of childcare is the sue-if-you-can culture introduced by tony b liar's government resulting in ever increasing insurance premiums

lentil_curry says...
10:17pm Sun 3 Mar 13

If both parents work - there are half as many jobs to go round - If daycare charges £48 a day - and it's a financial burden, why not stay home and enjoy time with your children? I am a teacher by profession, as well as being certified in early childhood education. (I ran summer programmes for kids who had parents working outside the home) When my children were older I went back to work - as a teacher I was fortunate enough to have holidays with them. If you make the choice to have a family - don't expect the council to pick up the tab so you. You say you work so you can "afford the things you want" - sometimes we can't all have what we want. In your post you complain about people who are not working- maybe if there were actually jobs out there for people, they would not be in the position that they are in.

cantthinkofone says...
5:44pm Mon 4 Mar 13

derek james wrote:
lentil_curry wrote:
One of the reasons our economy is such a mess comes down to the "want it all" mentality and greed. I chose to stay home with my children when they were small. Yes - money was tight, but you cannot put a value on raising a family.
I just don't understand why people have children, then farm them out to be raised by strangers...... The reason unemployment is so high is because two parents work - the reason house prices are so high is again because two parents work outside the home.
I do not see why the government should provide "affordable daycare". When you have children, you make sacrifices. How do we expect our kids to learn if we don't lead by example?
the reason house prices are so high is uncontrolled immigration and houses snapped up by buy-to-letters, the same again for unemployment,probabl

y another contrbutor to the high cost of childcare is the sue-if-you-can culture introduced by tony b liar's government resulting in ever increasing insurance premiums
Cobblers.

The reason for housing shortage and/or high prices is that the market is deliberately starved by developers. They know full well that they can make bigger profits the more demand exceeds supply. Development is therefore limited by the housebuilders in order to maximise their return.

It's not a conspiracy, it's just good business. But it doesn't serve us, the general population, very well.

It never ceases to amaze that so many people claim to be entirely in favour of market capitalism, but don't like the effects it has (like this one). Most people seem to be unable to connect the cause and effect in their minds.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree