Send us your pictures and video by text, email or by uploading. Click here to find out how. »
7:40am Monday 13th October 2008
“DON’T treat us like second class citizens.”
That was the message from hundreds of dog owners who yesterday rounded on controversial plans for the future of the New Forest.
People spilled out of a packed Brockenhurst Village Hall at a rally organised by New Forest Dog Owners’ Group – the second mass protest against draft proposals by the New Forest National Park Authority (NPA).
Dog owners say the plans will exclude them from large parts of the Forest and could be followed by a complete ban on dog-walking in the area.
Click here to see clips from the protest Concerned dog-lovers listened to speeches from NF DOG ecologist David Dickinson, Kennel Club spokeswoman Holly Lee and New Forest MPs Julian Lewis and Desmond Swayne.
NPA chairman Clive Chatters and conservation director Stephen Trotter also fielded questions from the lively audience, who voiced concerns about plans to minimise the impact of dogs on the Forest, including the possibility of creating dog-free car parks.
However, Mr Trotter said only four or five car parks out of 150 in the New Forest would be affected.
Mr Dickinson said: “They are simply talking about it affecting four to five car parks at the moment. The actual number will depend on who is running the authority from day to day.
“In any case, why should we be treated as second class citizens?
“There’s absolutely nothing to indicate dogs damage ground-nesting birds – the real threat to these birds is agricultural practices.”
Mr Swayne, MP for New Forest West, added: “The notion of dog-free car parks is one they should stop considering because it is a bad idea.
“Why should there be car parks that are closed to you just because you happen to own a dog?
“The reality is that we have enjoyed the New Forest for years. Who is complaining and where is the problem? I just don’t see it.”
In response to concerns about dog fouling, Mrs Lee told the meeting that the health risk from dog faeces was “non-existent”.
Mr Chatters promised that the NPA would listen to Forest users and consider their views.
After the meeting, he added: “These are passionate people who know their dogs and the Forest well, and they are saying ‘why pick on us?’ “It’s a fair question, but there is absolutely no plan to ban dogs from the New Forest.
“Walking and riding in the New Forest are some of the things that make it special and we’re committed to enhancing that and help people understand it and enjoy it.”
Last weekend newly-formed pressure group Forest Uprising staged one of the biggest demonstrations the Forest has ever seen.
The hundreds of protesters who gathered on Wilverley Plain, near Brockenhurst, said their way of life would change forever if the new recreation management plan was approved.
Andy Locks Heath, says...
11:11pm Sun 12 Oct 08
Number6, Southampton says...
1:15pm Mon 13 Oct 08
Dr Alimantado, Babylon says...
1:57pm Mon 13 Oct 08
Andy Locks Heath wrote:yes, I think compromise is the key word for the militant dog owners. They have to give a little and perhaps negotiating might be a better way forward.
I'll reproduce something I said in another thread. Chris Packham took an admirable mediation stance here. The NPA may be a superfluous bureaucracy, but the Forest and its infrastructure and ecosystem does need some form of protection. If the NPA agreed to enact only the policies approved by the Verderers would ALL dog owners accept those changes? The answer is no, so even though the NPA may be an unnecessary bureaucracy, that is not the central issue here. The reason protection is now required from somebody such as the NPA is that a small minority of visitors can (and do) undermine all the care and understanding shown by the majority. People who know and care about the Forest are often the same ones motivated to protest, so it is no wonder the Dog Owners group above are so outraged. But do they represent ALL dog owners? No they do not. These people are not the problem. It's those who can't be bothered to protest but who will ignore any guidelines anyway for their own selfish ends. Horses and their owners are generally respecters of the Forest and are part of its ecosystem and culture anyway so they are out of the equation. Domestic dogs and their owners sadly are not. I am a dog owner myself but I have to say that some dog owners are the worst offenders in this group. Dog owners are not all wilfully malicious and uncaring but it has to be said that some are just unthinking and ignorant and the Dog Owners group must acknowledge this or shut up. It only takes one dog on one walk to destroy a breeding Dartford Warbler's season and with ever wider access the Forest can no longer afford that. Unless the Dog owners group are willing to take responsibility for all dog owners and not just for themselves then they and tneir group and their campaign are making things worse and not better and I challenge them to accept this.
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Daily Echo account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search for jobs with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Find the right person for you with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for homes with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
Search for cars with the Daily Echo
Search Now »
birdman, eastleigh says...
6:22pm Sun 12 Oct 08