News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


'No money to rebuild schools'

Sholing Technology College Sholing Technology College

THE Government has told a cross-party delegation of Southampton politicians there is no money to rebuild the city’s schools.

The blow comes just a day after it was revealed Southampton had slipped down the national GCSE league tables and has the worst-performing school in the country based on progress made by pupils.

The city has dropped four places nationally to 139th out of 151, according to the proportion of pupils leaving school with five or more A* to C grades, including maths and English.

Oasis Academy Mayfield had the lowest contextual value added score, which measures development between the ages of 11 and 16, of any school in England.

Labour MP John Denham and Tory education boss Cllr Paul Holmes travelled to Westminster with council children’s services director Clive Webster for a top level meeting with the Schools Minister to plead for extra cash for much-needed building projects in the city.

Southampton is facing a massive shortfall after the coalition government axed the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) scheme last year.

Click below to see a video of today's headlines in sixty seconds

The city had been promised £200m, with £110m in the first wave to completely rebuild five secondary schools and provide new IT facilities at three more.

Council bosses are also facing a massive shortfall as they try to create nearly 3,000 new places at primary schools to cope with a crisis caused in part by rising birth rates.

The authority has just £13m available for all school building projects, but expanding schools for under-11s alone could cost up to £38m.

The knock-on effect on secondaries is expected to cost another £15m within four years.

But Lord Hill told the trio Government coffers are empty, although he did pledge to order one of his senior officials to tour the city’s schools to see the problems first hand. The cross-party group hopes that will mean Southampton is given a better capital grant settlement next year.

Mr Denham said an assessment revealed tackling the “absolute minimum” level of repairs, including replacement windows, leaky roofs and asbestos-related issues, will cost £5m in the next financial year.

He said: “As well as that, a number of secondary schools went co-educational on the basis that the building programme was going ahead and they are now left with buildings that are unsuitable.

“The minister was very clear that there is no more money. What we did was put the case that when allocating money in future it was important that he understands Southampton’s needs.

“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut.

“It is frustrating we have lost the programme but we have to keep on at it now. I think we made a very strong case.”

Cllr Holmes said the meeting had been “successful”. He said: “It was a chance to put Southampton’s issues, challenges and successes to the minister, to raise its profile.

“He couldn’t give any guarantees or get his cheque book out, but officials will come and talk to us about any money that’s available in the future.”

Comments(22)

southy says...
2:37pm Thu 13 Jan 11

“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut.
normal then say one thing but do the other.

Shoong says...
2:51pm Thu 13 Jan 11

southy wrote:
“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut.
normal then say one thing but do the other.
I don't know why you bother differentiate between parties or any politicians, they all talk BS.

Do you sit here all day waiting for new stories to come in?

southy says...
3:11pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Shoong wrote:
southy wrote:
“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut.
normal then say one thing but do the other.
I don't know why you bother differentiate between parties or any politicians, they all talk BS.

Do you sit here all day waiting for new stories to come in?
will agree with on that, there is not a lot of differences between all the major party,s, that got to be expected they all supporting the same type of politics right wing stuff. just that the libs with do it in a bigger way than labour, and the tory,s will do it even in a bigger way than the libs.
lesser of the evils stuff.


has for the other bit its off topic, but i just pop in and out, but i am on the pc looking for stuff information and digging real deep. don't reply on this part has it will only take it even more off topic.

kazzey74 says...
3:15pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Shoong wrote:
southy wrote: “We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut. normal then say one thing but do the other.
I don't know why you bother differentiate between parties or any politicians, they all talk BS. Do you sit here all day waiting for new stories to come in?
i think thats verey rude reg the above sitting there all day for new stories more money should be spent on schools we should stop paying money towards drug addictes and drunks and putting that money were its needed in to schools there is some amazing teachers in our schools but they have to work in horribile schools becouse there is no money being put in to our schools

Here, There says...
3:42pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Didn't the particular Oasis Acadamy which failed miserably receive substantial investment in rebuilding i.e bricks and mortar, clearly a nice new buildings do not equate to a higher standard of education, perhaps investing in teachers may be more beneficial to future generations, we were taught, at times, in 'temporary' buildings but still managed to achieve decent grades.

Paramjit Bahia says...
4:15pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Oh NO.

Yet another bad news for the education of our children
.

I may dislike ConDem coalition but even I did not expect they will be so cruel. Especially when Tory Cll.Holmes and NuLabour’s MP John Denham joined together for genuinely good cause. They have been kicked in the teeth by ruthless Tory minister
.

I suppose when you are at the bottom only way could be up. If all of us unite beyond political divides on this issue, and campaign for our children, Southampton may be able to get desperately needed funding for schools.

RadicalEmu says...
4:16pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I'm surprised there aren't more accidents with the amount of sudden u-turns this government is performing!

Paramjit Bahia says...
4:21pm Thu 13 Jan 11

RadicalEmu wrote:
I'm surprised there aren't more accidents with the amount of sudden u-turns this government is performing!
Soon they may be passing a law to ban word U-turn and replace it with 'Magic round-about'
Because thats what this ConDem Coalition is all about.

RadicalEmu says...
4:23pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
RadicalEmu wrote:
I'm surprised there aren't more accidents with the amount of sudden u-turns this government is performing!
Soon they may be passing a law to ban word U-turn and replace it with 'Magic round-about'
Because thats what this ConDem Coalition is all about.
Hey, that rhymed!

Paramjit Bahia says...
4:54pm Thu 13 Jan 11

southy wrote:
“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut. normal then say one thing but do the other.
You can’t be accused of making it up today. With my tendency to forget, even I remember reading that in the Echo
.

But I don’t trust Tories or Liberal-Democrats so was not fooled by cunning Cameron’s false promise and voted for tried and tested sitting MP Alan Whitehead once again.
Obviously most people in Southampton also did the same
.

Sadly our city is paying the price for others who were misled by main media and massively expensive campaigns financed by the likes of Cashcroft into believing that self confessed nasty party has become softer and Lib-Dems reliable **** cats
.

Mind you NuLabour’s constant betrayal of good old Labour values only helped the other two parties
.
I think tonight in by-election you will see that people have found out the truth. So let us wait for comparatively good news i.e. ‘Our Devil’ will be knocking the wind out of ‘devils’ of others. (You haven’t heard me saying ‘POLITICAL TRIPLETS’)

southy says...
5:17pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Paramjit Bahia wrote:
southy wrote:
“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut. normal then say one thing but do the other.
You can’t be accused of making it up today. With my tendency to forget, even I remember reading that in the Echo
.

But I don’t trust Tories or Liberal-Democrats so was not fooled by cunning Cameron’s false promise and voted for tried and tested sitting MP Alan Whitehead once again.
Obviously most people in Southampton also did the same
.

Sadly our city is paying the price for others who were misled by main media and massively expensive campaigns financed by the likes of Cashcroft into believing that self confessed nasty party has become softer and Lib-Dems reliable **** cats
.

Mind you NuLabour’s constant betrayal of good old Labour values only helped the other two parties
.
I think tonight in by-election you will see that people have found out the truth. So let us wait for comparatively good news i.e. ‘Our Devil’ will be knocking the wind out of ‘devils’ of others. (You haven’t heard me saying ‘POLITICAL TRIPLETS’)
last time i look at the by-election, the torys might end up losing there deposit.
but those sort of things, you can never really tell till the last minute, looks like labour will take that seat again any way so no change.

janee says...
5:24pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Not only did Oasis Mayfield get money for new buildings but it would also have got 3 years of extra funding, which just goes to show that the Academies programme, whether new or old, is a total waste of money and does not improved results.

Lord Hill has written a letter to one head which clearly indicates that the agenda is about attacking the unions and working conditions. As someone who work for many years before becoming a teacher, I have seen both sides of the fence and teaching was the hardest job I ever did (even though the most rewarding and interesting).

Torchie1 says...
5:54pm Thu 13 Jan 11

southy wrote:
Paramjit Bahia wrote:
southy wrote:
“We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut. normal then say one thing but do the other.
You can’t be accused of making it up today. With my tendency to forget, even I remember reading that in the Echo
.

But I don’t trust Tories or Liberal-Democrats so was not fooled by cunning Cameron’s false promise and voted for tried and tested sitting MP Alan Whitehead once again.
Obviously most people in Southampton also did the same
.

Sadly our city is paying the price for others who were misled by main media and massively expensive campaigns financed by the likes of Cashcroft into believing that self confessed nasty party has become softer and Lib-Dems reliable **** cats
.

Mind you NuLabour’s constant betrayal of good old Labour values only helped the other two parties
.
I think tonight in by-election you will see that people have found out the truth. So let us wait for comparatively good news i.e. ‘Our Devil’ will be knocking the wind out of ‘devils’ of others. (You haven’t heard me saying ‘POLITICAL TRIPLETS’)
last time i look at the by-election, the torys might end up losing there deposit.
but those sort of things, you can never really tell till the last minute, looks like labour will take that seat again any way so no change.
Twenty six TUSC candidates from the last General Election will hopefully offer sympathy and support if they all have something in common.

cyber_fug says...
6:02pm Thu 13 Jan 11

This should set the cat amongst the pigeons.... if it's true of course ;o)

http://falseeconomy.
org.uk/blog/no-money
-left-uk-corporation
s-are-sitting-on-a-6
00bn-surplus

RadicalEmu says...
6:19pm Thu 13 Jan 11

cyber_fug wrote:
This should set the cat amongst the pigeons.... if it's true of course ;o)

http://falseeconomy.

org.uk/blog/no-money

-left-uk-corporation

s-are-sitting-on-a-6

00bn-surplus
Nice work!

southy says...
7:22pm Thu 13 Jan 11

RadicalEmu wrote:
cyber_fug wrote:
This should set the cat amongst the pigeons.... if it's true of course ;o)

http://falseeconomy.


org.uk/blog/no-money


-left-uk-corporation


s-are-sitting-on-a-6


00bn-surplus
Nice work!
its true cyber, i know where duncan got that from.

Condor Man says...
8:51pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Perhaps Sholing want to ask their MP why when he was Higher Education Minister the money to move them to the Itchen College site disappeared? Also, after 13 years of government why weren't these projects started sooner? The reason was that most plans were ill-conceived and not properly thought through.

Schools need to concentrate on providing excellent educations, not on buildings. I was taught in huts, it got me to a proper university.

RadicalEmu says...
9:15pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Condor Man wrote:
Perhaps Sholing want to ask their MP why when he was Higher Education Minister the money to move them to the Itchen College site disappeared? Also, after 13 years of government why weren't these projects started sooner? The reason was that most plans were ill-conceived and not properly thought through.

Schools need to concentrate on providing excellent educations, not on buildings. I was taught in huts, it got me to a proper university.
Was the university made of straw or brick?

Condor Man says...
9:34pm Thu 13 Jan 11

RadicalEmu wrote:
Condor Man wrote:
Perhaps Sholing want to ask their MP why when he was Higher Education Minister the money to move them to the Itchen College site disappeared? Also, after 13 years of government why weren't these projects started sooner? The reason was that most plans were ill-conceived and not properly thought through.

Schools need to concentrate on providing excellent educations, not on buildings. I was taught in huts, it got me to a proper university.
Was the university made of straw or brick?
the huts may have been made from mud, the uni was built from stone.

I am Saint Paul says...
11:40pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I find this slightly annoying when i read that this government has recently spent 2 million pounds on a new school in Afghanistan funded by UK taxpayers.
I think it was on the same day that i read that the Afghan premier had criticised the British military approach in Afghanistan.

number7 says...
1:55am Fri 14 Jan 11

kazzey74 wrote:
Shoong wrote:
southy wrote: “We were promised by David Cameron in the Daily Echo that the BSF programme would not be cut. normal then say one thing but do the other.
I don't know why you bother differentiate between parties or any politicians, they all talk BS. Do you sit here all day waiting for new stories to come in?
i think thats verey rude reg the above sitting there all day for new stories more money should be spent on schools we should stop paying money towards drug addictes and drunks and putting that money were its needed in to schools there is some amazing teachers in our schools but they have to work in horribile schools becouse there is no money being put in to our schools
The UK needs to legalise drugs. Especially cannabis. That will sort out the countries money problems AND will cut down the crime rate.

SIMPLE ISN'T IT?!?!

RadicalEmu says...
2:19pm Fri 14 Jan 11

I am Saint Paul wrote:
I find this slightly annoying when i read that this government has recently spent 2 million pounds on a new school in Afghanistan funded by UK taxpayers.
I think it was on the same day that i read that the Afghan premier had criticised the British military approach in Afghanistan.
And why not? We're bombing the place, the least we could do is sweep up after ourselves.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree