Report this comment
  • "
    clausentum wrote:
    Georgem wrote:
    clausentum wrote:
    Condor Man wrote:
    freefinker wrote:
    Condor Man wrote:
    Freefinker, I think you're being rather disingenuous to a lot of rational thinking people who happen to share different views to you. Perhaps you too are an eminent professor? Many people find faith later in life, not having been indoctrinated or having this inflicted on them. They don't have this baggage to face up to.

    I think you need to read all the facts before you start denouncing things you clearly no nothing about.
    ‘facts’ you say. Well let’s have some.

    Unless you are one of those crazy ‘bible literalists’ (and not even the pope is anymore) here are some facts: -
    1) The universe (or at least the only one we have evidence for) is about 13 billion years old.
    2) The earth and solar system are about 4.5 billion years old.
    3) Life on earth is about 3.8 billion years old.
    4) Complex multi-celled life is under 1 billion years old.
    5) The origins of primates are about 58 million years ago.
    6) The genus Homo evolved about 2.3 million years ago.
    7) Our own species, Homo sapiens, goes back a little over 100,000 years.

    Now CM, please, please tell me: -
    1) Do all the animals that have ever lived also have an afterlife in heaven or hell?
    2) Assuming that’s a ‘no’, then, what’s so special about our species (evolved as we have, like ALL others, by Darwinian natural selection) that after billions of years your god decides s/he is going to ‘create’ heaven and hell, but give it to just this one very recently evolved species?
    3) And, why did s/he take 100,000 years of our species existence to let us about this?

    Perhaps you can now reveal some ‘facts’ to answer these questions?
    I'm going to take you questions and ask around at the church (Highfield Church out of interest) to see what people think. There are a few uni professors there that could answer your questions, sadly I'm an arts graduate so won't do the responses the justice they deserve. Actually, Highfield Church run seminars during the year which discuss the questions you've raised. If you like I could send you some details?
    So.

    You have no answers to offer the other poster.

    So.

    You are totally bereft of a single response to any question they posed you.

    Instead, you opt for a cop-out by wanting to scurry off to your local church and ask for answers from church brethren with enhanced educational qualifications to your own or super superior brains such as university professors who also happen to be religious nuts.

    Where or where is your belief in yourself?

    Why stop at canvassing a bunch of locals?

    Why not kneel down and with your direct line of communication to your Almighty, pray to your God to provide answers
    Well, in all fairness, I don't see why people should be obliged to justify their faith to others. As an atheist myself, I find it quite embarrassing when others put so much effort into ridiculing religion, and trying so hard to point out the logical flaws in it. Not to mention, of course, the extreme pointlessness of trying to use reason in a discussion with someone who you already know doesn't really buy into the whole "reason" thing in the first place. The evidence is well-known, if it's mere existence isn't enough to change some people's minds, I doubt having it presented to them in an argument is going to do any better!
    Valid observation ;-)

    This particular religious nut is a shallow, one-dimensional representaion of religious nuts in general. He has nothing to offer apart from a dog-eared script given him by someone-else and appears incapable of original thought or grown-up thinking at all.

    He invited comment and derision by his outrageous statment that atheists are bigots whilst expressed that view with bigotry!

    You offer a timely reminder that to get carried away in debating such a fool is a pointless activity and really just a form of self-indulgence. Thanks.
    .. agreed.
    But a somewhat pleasurable self-indulgence all the same."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Eric Pickles overturns ban on prayers at council meetings

Sean Woodward Sean Woodward

Councils have been told they can continue holding prayers before meetings after one Hampshire authority vowed to join others in defying a ban.

The Government has rushed through new powers onto the statute book, days after a High Court ruling said it was unlawful for councils to incorporate prayers into proceedings.

It comes as the leader of one Hampshire authority said he would have been willing to defy the "ridiculous" ban.

Local Government secretary Eric Pickles has moved swiftly to overrule the controversial judgement.

He signed a parliamentary order that came into effect at midnight making the practice of holding prayers lawful.

It brings forward a power contained in the Government's Localism Act, which was due to come into force in April.

The ruling, by Mr Justice Ouseley, had been branded 'ridiculous' and 'anti-Christian' by some councillors, who were prepared to defy the ban before Mr Pickles intervened.

Cllr Sean Woodward, leader of Fareham Borough Council, said: “When I became the leader of Fareham Borough Council I formalised prayers on the council agenda and we have had them at the start of every full council meeting ever since. That was 13 years ago.

“But now I have been told by the council's solicitor that, if the prayers appear on the agenda for this week's meeting, I will be breaking the law and could face prosecution. That is just ridiculous. The Church of England is the established church in this country and saying prayers at the start of council meetings is a tradition that should not be changed.”

The ruling came after an atheist former councillor took Bideford Town Council in Devon to the court, with the backing of the National Secular Society.

On the new powers given to councils Mr Pickles said: “We are striking a blow for localism over central interference, for freedom to worship over intolerant secularism, for parliamentary sovereignty over judicial activism, and for longstanding British liberties over modern-day political correctness.

“Last week's case should be seen as a wake-up call. For too long, the public sector has been used to marginalise and attack faith in public life, undermining the very foundations of the British nation. But this week, the tables have turned.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree