Most sick benefit claimants 'are fit to work'

Most sick benefit claimants are fit to work Most sick benefit claimants are fit to work

MORE than two-thirds of Hampshire’s incapacity benefit claimants are being judged capable of work, it has been revealed.

For the first time, the impact of controversial new tests on people in the area receiving incapacity benefit has been published - and it shows around a third been told to look for work immediately. Another third could work with the right support, officials said.

This means that across the Hampshire and Southampton council areas, around 22,000 of the 31,000 claimants are likely to be deemed fit for work by the time all have been tested.

Employment Minister, Chris Grayling, said the figures proved the benefits system had been “a waste of human life,”

adding: “Too many people have been left languishing on benefits for too long.”

In Southampton, 120 of the 390 tests results published so far came out as fit for work, while 150 people were told they would be able to work with the right support.

Across the south area, less than a third of the claimants tested were told they could continue to receive the payment without having to look for work.

The Work Capability Assessments, carried out by French company Atos, have been controversial, with disability charities calling for them to be suspended.

There have been a large number of appeals against the assessments, with around 40 per cent of findings across the country being overturned, suggesting a number of those told to return to work will be able to carry on claiming.

Critics said the test failed to identify mental health conditions and vilified disabled people as benefit cheats.

It was introduced by Labour in 2008 as an attempt to weed out incapacity benefits claimants who were judged fit to do some form of work. The coalition government decided to expand it to existing claimants.

A series of changes were made after a governmentcommissioned review found the test, which involves physical and mental challenges, was “impersonal and mechanistic.”

Southampton Itchen Labour MP, John Denham, said he supported the principle of the testing but warned about some of the results.

The former minister said his party had assumed around half of claimants were capable of work when it had been in government.

But he added: “There is undoubtedly some real stress being caused to people, some of whom will never, ever work.”

Comments(69)

Just another reader says...
6:13pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Interesting. I reckon if you get this lot back to work they'll be doing the jobs our Polish invaders are doing.

Dr Martin says...
6:22pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Just another reader wrote:
Interesting. I reckon if you get this lot back to work they'll be doing the jobs our Polish invaders are doing.
I doubt it if some of those benefit scoungers have to work as hard as the poles do they would cry off sick for months

dango says...
6:26pm Sun 22 Apr 12

I wouldn't really trust a study carried out by a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkys to be honest. It depends how you define fit. Fit to work in an office is very different to being fit to work on a production line or on a building site, for instance.

dolomiteman says...
6:34pm Sun 22 Apr 12

dango wrote:
I wouldn't really trust a study carried out by a bunch of cheese eating surrender monkys to be honest. It depends how you define fit. Fit to work in an office is very different to being fit to work on a production line or on a building site, for instance.
It may be different but doesn't change the fact there are lot of people claiming 'sick'because they can not be bothered to work. Too many doctors, GP's and other specialist are all too happy to sign someone off just because they say they can't work etc.

bigfella777 says...
6:39pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Well I never who would have believed it, now all they need is some jobs to apply for.
What employer is going to look at their CV and see 10 years couldnt be bothered and claimed benefits I wasnt entitled too as an incentive to employ them.
All this means is they will be put onto a different benefit what a sham.

freemantlegirl2 says...
7:11pm Sun 22 Apr 12

The Daily Mail and the DWP have been caught out 'manipulating' the truth about this. Check out the FactCheck website which is non-biased and impartial.

There will always be people who don't want to work, but our welfare system is for those that aren't able or temporarily unable. The amount of revenue lost in tax avoidance is far greater than benefit fraud yet these slippery individuals mostly 'get away with it'. Everyone moans about the IR and choose to focus on benefit claimants but I bet if someone looked at a sample of the same population and their Tax affairs the results would be quite startling. Before you go on about benefit fraud, look at your own house and tax payments - are you doing any work on the side/cash in hand that you accidentally forget about? I'm betting most of us have one time or another.

Not condoning those who are really swinging the lead because it's disgusting and leads to hysteria and benefit slashing and only penalises those who are most vulnerable.

sarfhamton says...
7:12pm Sun 22 Apr 12

I totally agree that people on work related benefits should be tested but these seem to be very simplistic.

I also agree that many people from Poland and beyond have shown that will do the work that many British born job seekers would not / could not do.

The answer to all this is create a work culture again and show that going to work for many people keeps them both mentally and physically well.

The wickedsaint says...
7:16pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Would anyone want these lazy low life people in their workplace? They'll turn up for a few days then go sick. There's no wonder the poles came to the UK - they turn up everyday and often do a better job, and it's not just them. There's many nationalities working in the UK to get cash so why don't the natives do the same? Because they think they have a right not to lift a finger. So STOP THEIR BENEFITS NOW if they've been found fit enough. They can pay back the cash they've received fraudulently so we can tax cuts (oops, I must be dreaming).

BenjiWinsor says...
7:21pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Not for the first time freemantlegirl you are the only voice of sense in the comments here.

Out of all those deemed fit for work following an ATOS computer assessment between 40%-70% (depending on whether they are represented) of those that appeal have that decision overturned by a panel consisting of a qualified Doctor, a specialist in disability and a qualified Doctor who know far more than an ATOS computer. So the numbers actually deemed fit for work following the appeals process is far smaller than the numbers quoted here.

saintmark1977 says...
7:22pm Sun 22 Apr 12

If in any type of employment you were proven to have made the wrong decision four out of every ten times (the successful appeal rate) then this would suggest to me that it is you who should be made to look for another job not the claimant. Or have I missed something?

Further, what is the cost to the government in processing these unnecessary appeals? Perhaps our French friends at ATOS need to be looked at to see if they are providing value for money?

For those who are judged fit for work where are the jobs? We currently have 2.6 million unemployed persons including over 1 million young people and less than 500,000 vacant positions.

Just thought I would add a little balance to the previous posts.

Turtlebay says...
7:22pm Sun 22 Apr 12

During these times of high unemployment where are they supposed to get work?
Mr Denham's party when in power nearly bankrupted the country, so perhaps he could answer this question himself, here on this column!

Over the Edge says...
7:29pm Sun 22 Apr 12

freemantlegirl2 wrote:
The Daily Mail and the DWP have been caught out 'manipulating' the truth about this. Check out the FactCheck website which is non-biased and impartial.

There will always be people who don't want to work, but our welfare system is for those that aren't able or temporarily unable. The amount of revenue lost in tax avoidance is far greater than benefit fraud yet these slippery individuals mostly 'get away with it'. Everyone moans about the IR and choose to focus on benefit claimants but I bet if someone looked at a sample of the same population and their Tax affairs the results would be quite startling. Before you go on about benefit fraud, look at your own house and tax payments - are you doing any work on the side/cash in hand that you accidentally forget about? I'm betting most of us have one time or another.

Not condoning those who are really swinging the lead because it's disgusting and leads to hysteria and benefit slashing and only penalises those who are most vulnerable.
Totally agree and people with unseen conditions will be forced back into once the Tories changes really kick in.

Linesman says...
7:33pm Sun 22 Apr 12

freemantlegirl2 wrote:
The Daily Mail and the DWP have been caught out 'manipulating' the truth about this. Check out the FactCheck website which is non-biased and impartial.

There will always be people who don't want to work, but our welfare system is for those that aren't able or temporarily unable. The amount of revenue lost in tax avoidance is far greater than benefit fraud yet these slippery individuals mostly 'get away with it'. Everyone moans about the IR and choose to focus on benefit claimants but I bet if someone looked at a sample of the same population and their Tax affairs the results would be quite startling. Before you go on about benefit fraud, look at your own house and tax payments - are you doing any work on the side/cash in hand that you accidentally forget about? I'm betting most of us have one time or another.

Not condoning those who are really swinging the lead because it's disgusting and leads to hysteria and benefit slashing and only penalises those who are most vulnerable.
You are so right. More money lost by tax avoidance, by those who have plenty already, than is paid to benefits cheats.

Similarly with Blue Badge holders. They are going to be tested by physiotherapists, who have not got the qualifications that the badge holder's doctor has, and will say whether or not the badge should be withdrawn.

If the same time and effort were put in by the police and traffic wardens to check that those using the blue badge are the person to which the badge was issued, there would be a hell of a lot less blue badges in use.

ssnaked23 says...
8:13pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Turtlebay wrote:
During these times of high unemployment where are they supposed to get work? Mr Denham's party when in power nearly bankrupted the country, so perhaps he could answer this question himself, here on this column!
I think this has been a longtime coming as I for one think the welfare state has been abused by the lazy shirkers out there who think they have the right just to claim without having given anything towards this country's prosperity.
Turtlebay it seems to me that you are obviously not a Labour lover (probably a Conservative) I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralised" this once great manufacturing nation starting when Thatcher came in power in favour of having a service sector and the desire to go on a construction frenzy to build shopping malls for the sale of increased cheaper imported manufactured goods. Its no use saying about how the country was nearly bankrupted when there werent the jobs there in the first place we just dont have the manufacturing base like we did and not everyone of the working population is either able or wanting to work in the service sector where a lot of our problems have actually derived from. Think about the bankers and what they have done.

saintmark1977 says...
8:14pm Sun 22 Apr 12

The wickedsaint.

I could not help but smile at the last few words of your post where you say " so we can tax cuts".

Now there is an idea even the current government have not thought of, or have they?

forest hump says...
8:21pm Sun 22 Apr 12

It's political! problem is: the party that removes benefits loses votes. However, I think there will be more votes gained removing benefits from the hard working sector in this country. Just needs a manifesto that makes sense. We need MP's who care about something else than their own egos. Currently it is a shambles. Bunch of selfish, wannabe fame hunters.

Rob444 says...
8:27pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Several points here:

Why are the poor always being demonised?

Putting sick people on benefits was one of Thatcher's 36 measures to fiddle the unemployment figures.

If the people in question are fit for work, then how did they qualify for benefits in the first place? Some benefits employee must have made that decision.

Where are the jobs?

arthur dalyrimple says...
8:37pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Next stop ,concentration camps , the rich are the biggest scroungers going ,clamp down on them first,they can afford it.

callumj1991 says...
9:01pm Sun 22 Apr 12

This is good for the people that are cheating benefits, but for the people, for example my mum, who I took to one of the assessments and sat in there, the things they made her do we're unbelievable! She suffers from aggressive rhemotoid arthritis in her hands, legs, back and is clearly not able to work because of this! Yet they told her that she was! She went to court and won her case! But I totally agree that the people who are actually able to work, should!

Richard 51 says...
9:28pm Sun 22 Apr 12

If you think that someone with spinal damage and has to spend 24/7 in nappies is a benefit scrounger and is fit for work think again, also how many company’s have adult nappy changing areas.
It reallys **** (pun intended) me off when I read some of your comments

Spoonydoc says...
9:36pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Disappointingly inaccurate information from the Daily Echo and an example of articles which perpetuate myths of benefit scroungers.

People placed in the second group of the new benefit, known as the WRAG (Work Related Activity Group) are NOT fit for work as reported in this article. However they are expected to recover and be able to return to work at some point in the future. This could be years away. This group includes people suffering from cancer, MS, heart attacks, strokes and many other debilitating illnesses and disabilities. They are offered help and support until such time as their health improves. This is the situation for the 150 people mentioned in the article, while 120 are so ill that they are never expected to be able to work again. Thus even the headline of this article is factually wrong.

While the rest were indeed found fit to work it must be remembered that 40% of such decisions are overturned at appeal, with the success rate rising to 70% with representation.

The test itself has been found unfit for purpose by every inquiry going and the computer program (LIMA) on which it is based has been outlawed in many parts of the USA.

More worryingly the company which developed this software and which is the parent company of the one in charge of assessing claimants (and getting it wrong so often) has moved instead to the UK in order to sell... private insurance in the event of disability or illness...

There IS a story to be told here. Unfortunately it is not the one the Echo chose to write.

wizard says...
9:56pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Spoonydoc wrote:
Disappointingly inaccurate information from the Daily Echo and an example of articles which perpetuate myths of benefit scroungers.

People placed in the second group of the new benefit, known as the WRAG (Work Related Activity Group) are NOT fit for work as reported in this article. However they are expected to recover and be able to return to work at some point in the future. This could be years away. This group includes people suffering from cancer, MS, heart attacks, strokes and many other debilitating illnesses and disabilities. They are offered help and support until such time as their health improves. This is the situation for the 150 people mentioned in the article, while 120 are so ill that they are never expected to be able to work again. Thus even the headline of this article is factually wrong.

While the rest were indeed found fit to work it must be remembered that 40% of such decisions are overturned at appeal, with the success rate rising to 70% with representation.

The test itself has been found unfit for purpose by every inquiry going and the computer program (LIMA) on which it is based has been outlawed in many parts of the USA.

More worryingly the company which developed this software and which is the parent company of the one in charge of assessing claimants (and getting it wrong so often) has moved instead to the UK in order to sell... private insurance in the event of disability or illness...

There IS a story to be told here. Unfortunately it is not the one the Echo chose to write.
There is a big story to be told, unfortunately you get the blind leading the blind on these forums and perpetuating the hype!

Beer Monster says...
10:13pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Well done Spoonydoc for a decent and compelling argument - and you'll probably find that those insurers your refer to are partly controlled (by shares, directorship or otherwise) by MPs.

Cookiecutter says...
10:17pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Being unemployed is a curse and having to pit oneself against an immigrant Pole who is taking this country to the depths of destruction with their fighting in the streets and smashing rooming houses up with their drinking and their criminal activities. OH i know there are always a few bad apples but it only takes one maggot in a barrel to destroy good fruit. But ive yet to find any good apples.

clausentum says...
10:31pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Cookiecutter wrote:
Being unemployed is a curse and having to pit oneself against an immigrant Pole who is taking this country to the depths of destruction with their fighting in the streets and smashing rooming houses up with their drinking and their criminal activities. OH i know there are always a few bad apples but it only takes one maggot in a barrel to destroy good fruit. But ive yet to find any good apples.
"But ive yet to find any good apples."

Try eating pears.

Better still, purchase a bucketful of figs to aid your constipated racism.

The Wickham Man says...
11:36pm Sun 22 Apr 12

It has always been the duty if individuals to minimise their tax liability - not my words but the words of the Inland Revenue, and that has been the case pretty much since income tax was around. It is not up to the state to minimise anyone's tax burden but the individual themselves. Why gullible and unread fools like Freemantle woman and her claque get sucked in by the nasty and petty Lib Dem politics of spite, envy and revenge on this matter and start banging on about tax avoidance while knowing nothing about it is a mystery. Perhaps while engaged in their nasty and spiteful vengeance on anyone who happens to earn a good wage they should consider that a huge number of wealthy people are paying tax at a far higher rate than them and paying a far higher contribution than them. So shall we throw open all the prisons and let every criminal out just because a few people are engaged in legal tax avoidance? No? In that case, how the hell does tax avoidance by one set of people mitigate a totally diferent set of people who are benefit cheats?

saintmark1977 says...
11:36pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Cookiecutter,

Polish people are allowed to work in this country because of their legal rights as members of the European Union.

In the same way, if you wished to work in the E U then there would be nothing to stop you,assuming of course that you are a UK national. Indeed I believe some 500,000 U K nationals currently work in the E U hence it is by all means not all one way traffic .

Reference your comments in regard to you being unable to find any good apples. I respectfully suggest that you broaden your horizons and look harder.I know of some fine hardworking Poles particularly in the care industry.

David Icke says...
11:38pm Sun 22 Apr 12

Maybe it's just the circles i move in, but in my history there was a big enough problem with British born dole scum long before any Poles were made scapegoats. And the majority of Poles i do know are from my own place of work. Just thought i'd say.

MisterGrimsdale says...
11:41pm Sun 22 Apr 12

And the prize for the first idiot to mention "The bankers" goes to .....ssnaked23!
Congrats Snake - but can you explain why you go on about "the bankers" who are actually paying huge amounts of PAYE on their bonusses - yet you completely let off footballers who earn even more and have all their wages and bonusses paid into offshore accounts via limited companies so they aren't paying any tax contribution at all! Why do all the socialists give footballers and rock stars an easy ride, but pick on people who are actually paying a lot of tax?

Torchie1 says...
12:08am Mon 23 Apr 12

MisterGrimsdale wrote:
And the prize for the first idiot to mention "The bankers" goes to .....ssnaked23!
Congrats Snake - but can you explain why you go on about "the bankers" who are actually paying huge amounts of PAYE on their bonusses - yet you completely let off footballers who earn even more and have all their wages and bonusses paid into offshore accounts via limited companies so they aren't paying any tax contribution at all! Why do all the socialists give footballers and rock stars an easy ride, but pick on people who are actually paying a lot of tax?
The latest HMRC Income Tax figures show that 89% of all Income Tax is paid by the top 50% of earners. I think those who squeal about inequality ought to be grateful that the burden isn't more evenly distributed.

TEBOURBA says...
12:21am Mon 23 Apr 12

Thank God for Freemantlegirl2, Benji, Turtle, Over the Edge and Linesman, who seem to be the only contributors with any degree of commonsense and compassion as opposed to the hang 'em, waste them mob that predominates this column.
There are over 2.5m unemployed, over 1m of whom are between 16 and 24, where are these opportunities of employment?
Why do we need a French Company, ATOS to do this research, with 2.5m
unemployed in this country why not a use a British Company employing British people?
Does ATOS consider a one legged man should "hop to it?"
A blind man should "feel his way?" or a mentally challenged person to "get his head around it?"
Absolute Tory inspired propaganda to be thrown out with the dish water.

Poppy22 says...
1:47am Mon 23 Apr 12

One way of getting a lot of people back to work quicker would be the group of people who are injured physically or mentally by crime. Until their criminal injury payouts are received, they're not going to be willing to go back to normal working as they (understandably in many cases) want to receive as much as possible for the injuries they received. In practice, though, many could work (eg from a home-based PC or in a part time and supported back office admin role). So speed up the Court process and the criminal injuries system and get some people back into work quicker that way. It'd be a start. And set aside a proportion of public sector jobs for people in these circumstances.

ShakeyWiffles says...
4:19am Mon 23 Apr 12

I've been through the tests by ATOS and instead of helping me and trying to find a solution to my problem (I've wanted to work for years) they sent me into clinical depression because of the way I was treated. They keep saying I'm able to work now but I'm not. Not for longer than a few hours a week. I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis. I have tinitus in 1 ear and slightly slurred speech so I can't use the phone. I can't write where I broke my arm near the elbow. I have to use a walking stick anywhere where I don't know surfaces too well BUT some stupid computer fails to acknowledge this. They like to say that they do mental tests but they don't. My last interview I was made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over. Now what job involves that? My mother or father have to come with me as my short term memory no longer exists but they aren't allowed to speak so the questions they ask I have to reply with "I don't know" Do NOT label us all benefit thieves, the majority of us want nothing more than to work. Why am I typing this at 4:17am I hear you ask? I suffer from a slight bout of insomnia as all I concentrate on when I go to bed is the ringing in my ears. I think a lot of you need to think outside of the box and I really do hope nothing that makes you stay out of work happens EVER

Andy Locks Heath says...
6:44am Mon 23 Apr 12

TEBOURBA wrote:
Thank God for Freemantlegirl2, Benji, Turtle, Over the Edge and Linesman, who seem to be the only contributors with any degree of commonsense and compassion as opposed to the hang 'em, waste them mob that predominates this column.
There are over 2.5m unemployed, over 1m of whom are between 16 and 24, where are these opportunities of employment?
Why do we need a French Company, ATOS to do this research, with 2.5m
unemployed in this country why not a use a British Company employing British people?
Does ATOS consider a one legged man should "hop to it?"
A blind man should "feel his way?" or a mentally challenged person to "get his head around it?"
Absolute Tory inspired propaganda to be thrown out with the dish water.
And presumably your compassion extends to making a series of childish and offensive puns but then pretending that it was the tories who said it and not you? You will find it was you.

Beer Monster says...
7:47am Mon 23 Apr 12

saintmark1977 wrote:
Cookiecutter,

Polish people are allowed to work in this country because of their legal rights as members of the European Union.

In the same way, if you wished to work in the E U then there would be nothing to stop you,assuming of course that you are a UK national. Indeed I believe some 500,000 U K nationals currently work in the E U hence it is by all means not all one way traffic .

Reference your comments in regard to you being unable to find any good apples. I respectfully suggest that you broaden your horizons and look harder.I know of some fine hardworking Poles particularly in the care industry.
Totally agreed Mark - I'm currently working in Edinburgh, and the Wetherspoons I frequent most often, The Standing Order, employs a good handful of Poles, all of whom are friendly, hard working and speak perfectly decent English.

Considering that the hours they work are long, the work isn't always smooth running and they are on our minimum wage, I don't see any reason why anybody could resent their hard labour...

bigfella777 says...
8:01am Mon 23 Apr 12

ShakeyWiffles wrote:
I've been through the tests by ATOS and instead of helping me and trying to find a solution to my problem (I've wanted to work for years) they sent me into clinical depression because of the way I was treated. They keep saying I'm able to work now but I'm not. Not for longer than a few hours a week. I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis. I have tinitus in 1 ear and slightly slurred speech so I can't use the phone. I can't write where I broke my arm near the elbow. I have to use a walking stick anywhere where I don't know surfaces too well BUT some stupid computer fails to acknowledge this. They like to say that they do mental tests but they don't. My last interview I was made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over. Now what job involves that? My mother or father have to come with me as my short term memory no longer exists but they aren't allowed to speak so the questions they ask I have to reply with "I don't know" Do NOT label us all benefit thieves, the majority of us want nothing more than to work. Why am I typing this at 4:17am I hear you ask? I suffer from a slight bout of insomnia as all I concentrate on when I go to bed is the ringing in my ears. I think a lot of you need to think outside of the box and I really do hope nothing that makes you stay out of work happens EVER
You just about sum it up really, absolutely spineless, there's tons of people who work with disabilities, Oh poor me now I've got depression,you need a good kick up the @ss.

pod says...
9:22am Mon 23 Apr 12

bigfella777 wrote:
ShakeyWiffles wrote:
I've been through the tests by ATOS and instead of helping me and trying to find a solution to my problem (I've wanted to work for years) they sent me into clinical depression because of the way I was treated. They keep saying I'm able to work now but I'm not. Not for longer than a few hours a week. I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis. I have tinitus in 1 ear and slightly slurred speech so I can't use the phone. I can't write where I broke my arm near the elbow. I have to use a walking stick anywhere where I don't know surfaces too well BUT some stupid computer fails to acknowledge this. They like to say that they do mental tests but they don't. My last interview I was made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over. Now what job involves that? My mother or father have to come with me as my short term memory no longer exists but they aren't allowed to speak so the questions they ask I have to reply with "I don't know" Do NOT label us all benefit thieves, the majority of us want nothing more than to work. Why am I typing this at 4:17am I hear you ask? I suffer from a slight bout of insomnia as all I concentrate on when I go to bed is the ringing in my ears. I think a lot of you need to think outside of the box and I really do hope nothing that makes you stay out of work happens EVER
You just about sum it up really, absolutely spineless, there's tons of people who work with disabilities, Oh poor me now I've got depression,you need a good kick up the @ss.
I just tried standing on one leg, and I nearly fell over too.
I was diagnosed last year with a progressive disease, but luckily I am still working, but I do not know for how long. The problem is so many people who could work are abusing the system, making it difficult for people who are really unable to work to claim what they are entitled to. I know of many people who continue to work, a friend who is a double amputee has always worked full time, I also know of someone else who claims to be unable to work but regularly drives a transit van with a caravan up to scotland and back.
You are always going to get the gimmes in life.

loosehead says...
9:25am Mon 23 Apr 12

freemantlegirl2 wrote:
The Daily Mail and the DWP have been caught out 'manipulating' the truth about this. Check out the FactCheck website which is non-biased and impartial.

There will always be people who don't want to work, but our welfare system is for those that aren't able or temporarily unable. The amount of revenue lost in tax avoidance is far greater than benefit fraud yet these slippery individuals mostly 'get away with it'. Everyone moans about the IR and choose to focus on benefit claimants but I bet if someone looked at a sample of the same population and their Tax affairs the results would be quite startling. Before you go on about benefit fraud, look at your own house and tax payments - are you doing any work on the side/cash in hand that you accidentally forget about? I'm betting most of us have one time or another.

Not condoning those who are really swinging the lead because it's disgusting and leads to hysteria and benefit slashing and only penalises those who are most vulnerable.
Out of all the appeals 60% have been found capable of working.
Freemantle girl I know of one/two individuals who were both claiming. one had a studio flat(council) one lived in a two bedroom flat. both claimed social one claimed invalidity pay.
they both were living in the same flat the studio was rented out.
one of them went ahead & worked on the side whilst claiming he ended up buying the place he was working at & then selling it at a profit & carried on working there.
I know of many cases similar to this one.
I & my friend would work every hour we could yet these people seemed to have far more money than us & if with out them knowing it was us we could have shopped them we would have,
you go on about tax avoidance?
these people are stealing straight from us this is the money we have had to pay for being honest & going to work.
tax avoidance just means there's less money to give to the welfare cheats.
You can't as has been seen by the charities going ape about the rate you get tax relief on money paid to charities really say that tax avoidance ( charity payments) is the same as Fraudulently claiming benefits as surely no charity benefits from the latter does it?

loosehead says...
9:38am Mon 23 Apr 12

So all the are the majority of you saying there aren't people fraudulently claiming benefits?
Labour instigated this process & with every new test/idea there are flaws which the 40-70% appeals have proven but what about the other 30-60%? are they all innocent to?
Is this Maggies fault they're screwing the system?
didn't Brown want us all to go into White collar work?
Are you telling me these people couldn't sit at a desk?
Have you watched any program that show you the extremes these people go to con their doctors?
A genuine person should get all our help.
but do the ones who say they can't walk very far & then get caught ski-ing?
If we forget politics & we were honest how many of you know of someone diddling the welfare system?
Sort out the frauds & the welfare bill wouldn't be so high & there would be more for the genuine people & less for us to pay out

rightway says...
10:55am Mon 23 Apr 12

The benifits system was introduced to help those in need, whether that was because of health issues or between jobs. Unfortunately many claimants have decided on this as a way of life and know how to work the system to their advantage, this then has the effect of branding all or many claimants as social scroungers, this of course is not the case, those in need should be helped that is the basic idea behind a caring society but for those who see benefits as a free meal ticket, should receive nothing from society until they are prepared to contribute.
This of course does not take away the fact that politicians will always use the vulnerable as whipping boys for their political ends.
Those unable to defend themselves always make the easiest targets.

cliffwalker says...
10:56am Mon 23 Apr 12

It is no wonder that righteous indignation is aroused on the subject of benefits when the media propounds such wildly inaccurate interpretations of published figures. We expect such fanciful and prejudiced stories from the Daily Mail but why does the Echo feel it has to copy?

If all this effort is spent on demonising almost every claimant as a benefit cheat, what resources are left over for identifying the real fraudsters?

George4th says...
11:12am Mon 23 Apr 12

ssnaked23 wrote:
Turtlebay wrote:
During these times of high unemployment where are they supposed to get work? Mr Denham's party when in power nearly bankrupted the country, so perhaps he could answer this question himself, here on this column!
I think this has been a longtime coming as I for one think the welfare state has been abused by the lazy shirkers out there who think they have the right just to claim without having given anything towards this country's prosperity.
Turtlebay it seems to me that you are obviously not a Labour lover (probably a Conservative) I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralise
d" this once great manufacturing nation starting when Thatcher came in power in favour of having a service sector and the desire to go on a construction frenzy to build shopping malls for the sale of increased cheaper imported manufactured goods. Its no use saying about how the country was nearly bankrupted when there werent the jobs there in the first place we just dont have the manufacturing base like we did and not everyone of the working population is either able or wanting to work in the service sector where a lot of our problems have actually derived from. Think about the bankers and what they have done.
"I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralised" this once great manufacturing nation"

When Thatcher took over this country was bankrupt and being run by the IMF! Our so called "industries" were uncompetitive and controlled by the Unions who had long prevented modernisation.
>
I suggest you have a look at the BBC 2 program from last week called "The 70s" when they covered 1971 and 1972. 1973 and 1974 are on tonight.

Spoonydoc says...
11:15am Mon 23 Apr 12

No one said there was no fraud at all. No one said that some of those claiming might be able to do some sort of different work, something that was lacking in the old system.

What is wrong is the headline, the figures and the proportion of people able to do so. When taking the correct figures and appeals into account, 85% of claimants are in fact unfit for work (only roughly 60 of the 390 claimants will be moved to job seekers allowance).

This is completely different to the sensationalist headline "most sick benefit claimants are fit to work" and the claim that 22,000 of 31,000 will be found fit for work. It simply is not true and articles like this are downright irresponsible.

Living with sickness and disability, losing your career and your income is difficult enough without having to defend yourself against accusations of fraud and laziness.

George4th says...
11:22am Mon 23 Apr 12

loosehead wrote:
So all the are the majority of you saying there aren't people fraudulently claiming benefits?
Labour instigated this process & with every new test/idea there are flaws which the 40-70% appeals have proven but what about the other 30-60%? are they all innocent to?
Is this Maggies fault they're screwing the system?
didn't Brown want us all to go into White collar work?
Are you telling me these people couldn't sit at a desk?
Have you watched any program that show you the extremes these people go to con their doctors?
A genuine person should get all our help.
but do the ones who say they can't walk very far & then get caught ski-ing?
If we forget politics & we were honest how many of you know of someone diddling the welfare system?
Sort out the frauds & the welfare bill wouldn't be so high & there would be more for the genuine people & less for us to pay out
I agree with you.
>
The holier than thous come on here and defend the indefensible!
The general public is two faced. It will complain about what "they" see as unfair but when it comes to their own lives and the lives of people around them, they see it differently. Why don't people report known benefit fiddlers? Why don't you report known tax dodgers? Why don't you report VAT dodgers? Do you report any of those engaged in the Black Market economy who do not declare their income for tax purposes? Do you report those who do cash deals and don't declare it? Do you report trades people for not invoicing for VAT? Do you pay VAT on everything?! Do you buy cheap tobacco? Do you buy cheap alcohol? Etc etc etc.........
>
I am a big fan of the welfare state. It is there for anyone who requires genuine help and assistance. I do not like benefit cheats.

soobear says...
11:26am Mon 23 Apr 12

Disability benefits are almost impossible to get without a fight, especially for invisible illnesses. I am registered as self employed and do what I can at home, as I have a chronic physical disability which meant I had to give up my job several years ago. I do not claim disability benefits even though I am entitled to them. Most people who actually get the benefits have to fight very hard through tribunals to get accepted, so I seriously doubt there are many 'scroungers' as another poster put it, on disability benefits.

chunky_lover says...
11:29am Mon 23 Apr 12

If you're well enough to stand outside the job centre drinking a can of special brew, then you're well enough to get a job! Get off your arse!

ohec says...
11:40am Mon 23 Apr 12

I think we would all agree that something has to be done to reduce the welfare bill, we all know who is to blame for the current situation but who has got the answer whatever the final result is after any appeal any attempt to reduce the welfare bill has to be a good thing even if it only means going onto JSA as opposed to incapacity benefit (less money and a requirement to look for work) we need to restore the work ethic or in many cases teach it but the only way to do that is to make work pay, so benefits need to be slowly reduced or in some cases scrapped altogether i.e. family allowance for one. We need to be looking at future welfare costs now as we have an ageing population that are living longer so the pension and the health costs are going to rise very quickly, having a child is a choice getting older isn't so if you can't support a child don't have one. As for the argument about foreigners taking our jobs don't blame them blame our governments for allowing it, many Brits work abroad for the same reason the Pole's come here "money" they can earn more and get benefits to send home, we should pull out of anything to do with the E.U. and take charge of our own country again.

loosehead says...
12:37pm Mon 23 Apr 12

ohec wrote:
I think we would all agree that something has to be done to reduce the welfare bill, we all know who is to blame for the current situation but who has got the answer whatever the final result is after any appeal any attempt to reduce the welfare bill has to be a good thing even if it only means going onto JSA as opposed to incapacity benefit (less money and a requirement to look for work) we need to restore the work ethic or in many cases teach it but the only way to do that is to make work pay, so benefits need to be slowly reduced or in some cases scrapped altogether i.e. family allowance for one. We need to be looking at future welfare costs now as we have an ageing population that are living longer so the pension and the health costs are going to rise very quickly, having a child is a choice getting older isn't so if you can't support a child don't have one. As for the argument about foreigners taking our jobs don't blame them blame our governments for allowing it, many Brits work abroad for the same reason the Pole's come here "money" they can earn more and get benefits to send home, we should pull out of anything to do with the E.U. and take charge of our own country again.
Did you see the tv program where they went up to a group of youths up North & offered them jobs?
it was farm work & if sufficient hours were worked they could earn far more than on the dole.
half were interested the other half said NO WAY why work?
then the half that sounded interested found out what the work was & the hours they would have to work. half said they wouldn't get out of bed to do that work the other half said wouldn't work to many hours & they get their rent paid & bills plus they get extra's for being on the dole.
In the end not one of them would take up the offer of work that's one of the reasons Eastern Europeans are finding 3million jobs which shows how wrong the welfare system now is when we have below 3million unemployed if these people were forced into the jobs we would through incapability have approximately 1million long turn unemployed.
plus roughly 1million vacancies you have to put blame where it belongs & that's successive governments not tackling the welfare/benefit system.
To have people coming on here saying it's hard to get disability payments are you in dream world?
the proof is in the pudding how many programs how many people not "grassing" on known frauds?
we have to find a test where people can't con the Doctors & the people who have a invalidity that stops them working get their money but not the frauds & yes we all know someone who's either on the fiddle or who has fiddled

ssnaked23 says...
1:28pm Mon 23 Apr 12

MisterGrimsdale wrote:
And the prize for the first idiot to mention "The bankers" goes to .....ssnaked23! Congrats Snake - but can you explain why you go on about "the bankers" who are actually paying huge amounts of PAYE on their bonusses - yet you completely let off footballers who earn even more and have all their wages and bonusses paid into offshore accounts via limited companies so they aren't paying any tax contribution at all! Why do all the socialists give footballers and rock stars an easy ride, but pick on people who are actually paying a lot of tax?
I think if you would like to read my comment I didnt make any reference about people (sorry, pick on people who actually paying a lot of tax)and their earnings and paying tax, rather I was pointing out that it was the service sector seemingly at fault and that due to the lack of manufacturing in this country not providing employment

ssnaked23 says...
1:34pm Mon 23 Apr 12

George4th wrote:
ssnaked23 wrote:
Turtlebay wrote: During these times of high unemployment where are they supposed to get work? Mr Denham's party when in power nearly bankrupted the country, so perhaps he could answer this question himself, here on this column!
I think this has been a longtime coming as I for one think the welfare state has been abused by the lazy shirkers out there who think they have the right just to claim without having given anything towards this country's prosperity. Turtlebay it seems to me that you are obviously not a Labour lover (probably a Conservative) I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralise d" this once great manufacturing nation starting when Thatcher came in power in favour of having a service sector and the desire to go on a construction frenzy to build shopping malls for the sale of increased cheaper imported manufactured goods. Its no use saying about how the country was nearly bankrupted when there werent the jobs there in the first place we just dont have the manufacturing base like we did and not everyone of the working population is either able or wanting to work in the service sector where a lot of our problems have actually derived from. Think about the bankers and what they have done.
"I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralised" this once great manufacturing nation" When Thatcher took over this country was bankrupt and being run by the IMF! Our so called "industries" were uncompetitive and controlled by the Unions who had long prevented modernisation. > I suggest you have a look at the BBC 2 program from last week called "The 70s" when they covered 1971 and 1972. 1973 and 1974 are on tonight.
I dont disagree that the unions didnt help matters
, but then neither did management, it wasnt just the unions preventing modernisation, as for being bankrupt that was the fault of both the Labour and Tory parties of the time, in fact by the late 80's our deficit was far worse than that of the 70's, £23000 Million as apposed to £3600 Million in the 70s). Suggest you read this article, one of many found on the Internet http://www.stewartmo
rris.com/essays/14In
gham2.pdf which talks about the Economic Crisis of the UK during the 1970's.

PREMIERSAINTS-FACT says...
2:41pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Well well and thats after the Government decision to reduce current funding for Remploy which helps those whom would normally qualify for benefit back into the workplace. Some of these people are obvious benefit candidates without the 'test' i.e. wheelchair bound, mentally challenged, mentally ill etc...!
Trash the test and give to the people that are obviously unable, the rest would need to fight their particular case's. I would also, probably quite controversially, remove the addition of obesity as an accepted condition (not including clinical obesity, and obesity as a side effect of any clincal illness).

George4th says...
2:51pm Mon 23 Apr 12

ssnaked23 wrote:
George4th wrote:
ssnaked23 wrote:
Turtlebay wrote: During these times of high unemployment where are they supposed to get work? Mr Denham's party when in power nearly bankrupted the country, so perhaps he could answer this question himself, here on this column!
I think this has been a longtime coming as I for one think the welfare state has been abused by the lazy shirkers out there who think they have the right just to claim without having given anything towards this country's prosperity. Turtlebay it seems to me that you are obviously not a Labour lover (probably a Conservative) I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralise d" this once great manufacturing nation starting when Thatcher came in power in favour of having a service sector and the desire to go on a construction frenzy to build shopping malls for the sale of increased cheaper imported manufactured goods. Its no use saying about how the country was nearly bankrupted when there werent the jobs there in the first place we just dont have the manufacturing base like we did and not everyone of the working population is either able or wanting to work in the service sector where a lot of our problems have actually derived from. Think about the bankers and what they have done.
"I would like to point out that the Conservatives "deindustralised" this once great manufacturing nation" When Thatcher took over this country was bankrupt and being run by the IMF! Our so called "industries" were uncompetitive and controlled by the Unions who had long prevented modernisation. > I suggest you have a look at the BBC 2 program from last week called "The 70s" when they covered 1971 and 1972. 1973 and 1974 are on tonight.
I dont disagree that the unions didnt help matters
, but then neither did management, it wasnt just the unions preventing modernisation, as for being bankrupt that was the fault of both the Labour and Tory parties of the time, in fact by the late 80's our deficit was far worse than that of the 70's, £23000 Million as apposed to £3600 Million in the 70s). Suggest you read this article, one of many found on the Internet http://www.stewartmo

rris.com/essays/14In

gham2.pdf which talks about the Economic Crisis of the UK during the 1970's.
Apart from the Left Wing led Unions there was another major factor influencing our society and it's called aspiration! As I said, watch the BBC 2 program "The 70s". Dominic Sandbrook is an historian well worth listening too.

Monty3 says...
5:10pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Tell us something we don't already know...the majority of people on benefits are claiming on the fiddle and don't really need them!

There is a culture of laziness and everyone feels they are "owed something" for doing nothing. It's easy to accuse immigrants of "stealing jobs"...but the fact the people on benefits would refuse to do the work anyway.

Monty3 says...
5:10pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Tell us something we don't already know...the majority of people on benefits are claiming on the fiddle and don't really need them!

There is a culture of laziness and everyone feels they are "owed something" for doing nothing. It's easy to accuse immigrants of "stealing jobs"...but the fact the people on benefits would refuse to do the work anyway.

ShakeyWiffles says...
6:06pm Mon 23 Apr 12

bigfella777 wrote:
ShakeyWiffles wrote:
I've been through the tests by ATOS and instead of helping me and trying to find a solution to my problem (I've wanted to work for years) they sent me into clinical depression because of the way I was treated. They keep saying I'm able to work now but I'm not. Not for longer than a few hours a week. I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis. I have tinitus in 1 ear and slightly slurred speech so I can't use the phone. I can't write where I broke my arm near the elbow. I have to use a walking stick anywhere where I don't know surfaces too well BUT some stupid computer fails to acknowledge this. They like to say that they do mental tests but they don't. My last interview I was made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over. Now what job involves that? My mother or father have to come with me as my short term memory no longer exists but they aren't allowed to speak so the questions they ask I have to reply with "I don't know" Do NOT label us all benefit thieves, the majority of us want nothing more than to work. Why am I typing this at 4:17am I hear you ask? I suffer from a slight bout of insomnia as all I concentrate on when I go to bed is the ringing in my ears. I think a lot of you need to think outside of the box and I really do hope nothing that makes you stay out of work happens EVER
You just about sum it up really, absolutely spineless, there's tons of people who work with disabilities, Oh poor me now I've got depression,you need a good kick up the @ss.
Oh how nice of you to ignore ALL my problems. I didn't say I was still depressed did I? I think YOU summed up what YOU are - SPINELESS.

Monty3 says...
6:37pm Mon 23 Apr 12

ShakeyWiffles wrote:
bigfella777 wrote:
ShakeyWiffles wrote:
I've been through the tests by ATOS and instead of helping me and trying to find a solution to my problem (I've wanted to work for years) they sent me into clinical depression because of the way I was treated. They keep saying I'm able to work now but I'm not. Not for longer than a few hours a week. I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis. I have tinitus in 1 ear and slightly slurred speech so I can't use the phone. I can't write where I broke my arm near the elbow. I have to use a walking stick anywhere where I don't know surfaces too well BUT some stupid computer fails to acknowledge this. They like to say that they do mental tests but they don't. My last interview I was made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over. Now what job involves that? My mother or father have to come with me as my short term memory no longer exists but they aren't allowed to speak so the questions they ask I have to reply with "I don't know" Do NOT label us all benefit thieves, the majority of us want nothing more than to work. Why am I typing this at 4:17am I hear you ask? I suffer from a slight bout of insomnia as all I concentrate on when I go to bed is the ringing in my ears. I think a lot of you need to think outside of the box and I really do hope nothing that makes you stay out of work happens EVER
You just about sum it up really, absolutely spineless, there's tons of people who work with disabilities, Oh poor me now I've got depression,you need a good kick up the @ss.
Oh how nice of you to ignore ALL my problems. I didn't say I was still depressed did I? I think YOU summed up what YOU are - SPINELESS.
Sounds like a case of hypochondria...if you change your attitude you'll find yourself more capable of doing stuff!

My dad still worked 12 hour shifts whilst on dialysis waiting for a kidney transplant and he felt terribly ill a lot of the time but just got on with things rather than making excuses!

There's no such thing as "can't"...I'm sick of people who say they can't do things!

Spoonydoc says...
7:02pm Mon 23 Apr 12

The Daily Echo's article is officially described as "misleading" by Factcheck, a website which verifies claims by newspapers all over the country. An extract follows:

"The same cannot be said for the article appearing yesterday in the Daily Echo with the rather sensational headline: "Most sick benefit claimants are fit to work".
However their definition of ‘fit to work’ leaves much to be desired. The opening claim of the paper that "more than two-thirds of Hampshire’s incapacity benefit claimants are being judged capable of work" can only be true if conflating those classified as Fit for Work with those claimants in the Work Related Activity Group. But to be placed in the WRAG one has to be:
“Suffering from a life threatening disease in relation to which there is medical evidence that the disease is uncontrollable.”
“An in-patient in a hospital or similar institution.”
“ regular weekly treatment by way of by way of haemodyalisis or chronic renal failure.”
“Receiving treatment by way of intravenous, intraperitoneal or intrathecal chemotherapy.”
Such individuals are not 'Fit for Work' as described by the Daily Echo.
Instead the DWP defines the Work Related Activity Group as those who, with the right support, may be able to return to work at some point in the future."

For full details see here:
http://fullfact.org/
factchecks/are_most_
incapacity_benefit_c
laimants_found_fit_f
or_work_in_some_part
s_of_the_country

Please do your research before printing inflammatory articles. The tone of the reader's comments shows only too well the damage it can cause.

Fatty x Ford Worker says...
7:17pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Luverly Jubbly money for nothing drink all night lay in bed all day!

Fatty x Ford Worker says...
7:19pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Monty3 wrote:
Tell us something we don't already know...the majority of people on benefits are claiming on the fiddle and don't really need them!

There is a culture of laziness and everyone feels they are "owed something" for doing nothing. It's easy to accuse immigrants of "stealing jobs"...but the fact the people on benefits would refuse to do the work anyway.
DONT YOU MEAN ON THE DRIP FEED!

pod says...
7:25pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Monty3 wrote:
ShakeyWiffles wrote:
bigfella777 wrote:
ShakeyWiffles wrote:
I've been through the tests by ATOS and instead of helping me and trying to find a solution to my problem (I've wanted to work for years) they sent me into clinical depression because of the way I was treated. They keep saying I'm able to work now but I'm not. Not for longer than a few hours a week. I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis. I have tinitus in 1 ear and slightly slurred speech so I can't use the phone. I can't write where I broke my arm near the elbow. I have to use a walking stick anywhere where I don't know surfaces too well BUT some stupid computer fails to acknowledge this. They like to say that they do mental tests but they don't. My last interview I was made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over. Now what job involves that? My mother or father have to come with me as my short term memory no longer exists but they aren't allowed to speak so the questions they ask I have to reply with "I don't know" Do NOT label us all benefit thieves, the majority of us want nothing more than to work. Why am I typing this at 4:17am I hear you ask? I suffer from a slight bout of insomnia as all I concentrate on when I go to bed is the ringing in my ears. I think a lot of you need to think outside of the box and I really do hope nothing that makes you stay out of work happens EVER
You just about sum it up really, absolutely spineless, there's tons of people who work with disabilities, Oh poor me now I've got depression,you need a good kick up the @ss.
Oh how nice of you to ignore ALL my problems. I didn't say I was still depressed did I? I think YOU summed up what YOU are - SPINELESS.
Sounds like a case of hypochondria...if you change your attitude you'll find yourself more capable of doing stuff!

My dad still worked 12 hour shifts whilst on dialysis waiting for a kidney transplant and he felt terribly ill a lot of the time but just got on with things rather than making excuses!

There's no such thing as "can't"...I'm sick of people who say they can't do things!
I type with one hand which will inevitably lead to arthritis - so you don't have it at the moment!!
Made to stand on one leg and I VERY nearly fell over.
Take your parents with you - how old are you?? I have short term memory loss and believe me that is the mild term for it and I am still working.
slight bout of insomnia - good job you do not have to get up for work then.
tinitus in one ear - my husband and many others have it in both and still work.
you broke your arm so cannot write - one of my friends only has one arm and he makes jewelery for a living, no benefits for him, as with many others, we all have problems. The difference is attitude - most of us just get on with it.
Maybe your post came over wrongly, but you are really coming across a a big baby whinger. man up and focus on what you can do and leave the benefit system for those that really need it.
Your computing skills are obviously ok.

cliffwalker says...
7:40pm Mon 23 Apr 12

The Echo should be ashamed at printing this false and inflammatory headline and story. Is this the standard of reporting we should now expect as routine from our very own local redtop?

deadbat says...
8:52pm Mon 23 Apr 12

Just another reader wrote:
Interesting. I reckon if you get this lot back to work they'll be doing the jobs our Polish invaders are doing.
Someone in a coma could be used as a door stop....

ShakeyWiffles says...
2:48am Tue 24 Apr 12

All of you bullying me do NOT EFFING KNOW ME ffs, My condition constantly changes. It's the tinitus and insomnia that NEVER EVER F**KING WILL. I AM TRYING TO WRITE, BUILDING UP THE STRENGTH IN MY ARM, BUT WHENEVER I GET CLOSE TO BEING ABLE TO WORK AGAIN, SOMETHING HAPPENS WITH MY WALKING WHICH SETS ME BACK ANOTHER FREAKING YEAR. PACK YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS S*1T IN. I'm 28, my DEATH occurred when I was 23 and I'm ONLY JUST trying to get back to work. I need my parents with me because I haven't got a clue what happened 5 minutes ago. 7 years - yeah, that's like yesterday. 5 minutes ago? Not a clue But do you really think 5 years out of work and the fact that I'm not abe to do the jobs I did before will entice me to a potential employer? I have a CV appointment on Wednesday so don't try and act like I'm a shirker. I get f*** all a month. I'm on ESA. Do you know what that stands for? EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE.

As for you Daily Echo. Feel bloody ashamed. I notice there wasn't a journalist willing to put his name to this drivel! Do you see what you've done? Set all these holier than thou "people" on someone for putting THE OTHER side across. Expect a FORMAL complaint from me.

P.S. whether or not my conputer skills are alright, this took me AN HOUR to type and funnily enough, no I don't have arthritis yet but give it a year and it'll be here. I use my left hand FOR EVERYTHING

bigfella777 says...
9:37am Tue 24 Apr 12

I think, one of the tragedies in which many of the benefits we give, which were meant to reassure people that if they were sick or ill there was a safety net and there was help, that many of the benefits which were meant to help people who were unfortunate—" It is all right. We joined together and we have these insurance schemes to look after it" . That was the objective, but somehow there are some people who have been manipulating the system and so some of those help and benefits that were meant to say to people:"All right, if you cannot get a job, you shall have a basic standard of living!" but when people come and say:"But what is the point of working? I can get as much on the dole!" You say:"Look" It is not from the dole. It is your neighbour who is supplying it and if you can earn your own living then really you have a duty to do it and you will feel very much better!"

One of my favourite speeches by the great Margaret Thatcher,only people who have morals and can actually feel guilt can understand this, who the hell do people think they are that I can just continually have my wages deducted every month just to go into their back pocket,its me and others like me that pay for all these bums and I have had enough of it.
In 3rd world countries people just have to get on with it.

rightway says...
11:14am Tue 24 Apr 12

bigfella777 wrote:
I think, one of the tragedies in which many of the benefits we give, which were meant to reassure people that if they were sick or ill there was a safety net and there was help, that many of the benefits which were meant to help people who were unfortunate—" It is all right. We joined together and we have these insurance schemes to look after it" . That was the objective, but somehow there are some people who have been manipulating the system and so some of those help and benefits that were meant to say to people:"All right, if you cannot get a job, you shall have a basic standard of living!" but when people come and say:"But what is the point of working? I can get as much on the dole!" You say:"Look" It is not from the dole. It is your neighbour who is supplying it and if you can earn your own living then really you have a duty to do it and you will feel very much better!" One of my favourite speeches by the great Margaret Thatcher,only people who have morals and can actually feel guilt can understand this, who the hell do people think they are that I can just continually have my wages deducted every month just to go into their back pocket,its me and others like me that pay for all these bums and I have had enough of it. In 3rd world countries people just have to get on with it.
Not only did Thatcher make great speeches (then again so did Stalin and Hitler), she was also very good at putting the hard working people of this country on the dole.
The sooner she and Beelzebub are reunited the better.

chunky_lover says...
11:27am Tue 24 Apr 12

Being unemployed on a long term basis is a personal choice.

loosehead says...
11:42am Tue 24 Apr 12

rightway wrote:
bigfella777 wrote:
I think, one of the tragedies in which many of the benefits we give, which were meant to reassure people that if they were sick or ill there was a safety net and there was help, that many of the benefits which were meant to help people who were unfortunate—" It is all right. We joined together and we have these insurance schemes to look after it" . That was the objective, but somehow there are some people who have been manipulating the system and so some of those help and benefits that were meant to say to people:"All right, if you cannot get a job, you shall have a basic standard of living!" but when people come and say:"But what is the point of working? I can get as much on the dole!" You say:"Look" It is not from the dole. It is your neighbour who is supplying it and if you can earn your own living then really you have a duty to do it and you will feel very much better!" One of my favourite speeches by the great Margaret Thatcher,only people who have morals and can actually feel guilt can understand this, who the hell do people think they are that I can just continually have my wages deducted every month just to go into their back pocket,its me and others like me that pay for all these bums and I have had enough of it. In 3rd world countries people just have to get on with it.
Not only did Thatcher make great speeches (then again so did Stalin and Hitler), she was also very good at putting the hard working people of this country on the dole.
The sooner she and Beelzebub are reunited the better.
Funny my friends lost their jobs due to the power cuts & some during the miners strikes these were all due to Union activity.
Leylands where strikes happened constantly even though it was owned by us was financially bankrupt yet still they went on strike.
Companies left in their droves through Union Activity so come on don't just blame Maggie.
Also when Manufacturing was going abroad Brown said that was old industry & we needed to invest in It & the City.
Brown also allowed 3million+ Eastern Europeans in & you only have to look at the figures to see what a mistake that was ( 2.75million unemployed 3+million immigrants) you don't have to be racists to see that mistake.
You had Mandelson ( unelected) brokering a deal with Kraft to buy Cadburies with our money he said he had their word they wouldn't go ahead with the Polish factory they would keep the work here But he didn't get it in writing or as part of the loan condition & what have Kraft done ?
Shut Bristol & opened Poland who's to blame for unemployment?

Sumofitall says...
1:37pm Tue 24 Apr 12

Racism isnt about race or creed ,its about labelling a group of people and victimising them for it .

I for one have paid over the years in excess of £40k a year tax ,and if someone is not well enough to work be it because of progressive illness or otherwise i will leave it to people who are medically inclined to work this out .

I do not however believe any computer program has the ability to judge the effect illness has on a humans ability to function .Most people with progressive illnesses and not ones that are short lived ,live a life in a hell that no ordinary person could live in as it slowly consumes them ,and to sit at your mundane jobs paying your measily tax efforts to the country ,and victimise them is outrageous .


Stories of people who fought their illnesses ,those people are lucky enough to have come out the other end ,not because they were strong ,but because probably their symptoms were simply not that bad and allowed them to work .

A headache only becomes a problem if it doesnt go away.


DWP is a disgrace ,always has been .

pod says...
1:12pm Thu 26 Apr 12

ShakeyWiffles wrote:
All of you bullying me do NOT EFFING KNOW ME ffs, My condition constantly changes. It's the tinitus and insomnia that NEVER EVER F**KING WILL. I AM TRYING TO WRITE, BUILDING UP THE STRENGTH IN MY ARM, BUT WHENEVER I GET CLOSE TO BEING ABLE TO WORK AGAIN, SOMETHING HAPPENS WITH MY WALKING WHICH SETS ME BACK ANOTHER FREAKING YEAR. PACK YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS S*1T IN. I'm 28, my DEATH occurred when I was 23 and I'm ONLY JUST trying to get back to work. I need my parents with me because I haven't got a clue what happened 5 minutes ago. 7 years - yeah, that's like yesterday. 5 minutes ago? Not a clue But do you really think 5 years out of work and the fact that I'm not abe to do the jobs I did before will entice me to a potential employer? I have a CV appointment on Wednesday so don't try and act like I'm a shirker. I get f*** all a month. I'm on ESA. Do you know what that stands for? EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE.

As for you Daily Echo. Feel bloody ashamed. I notice there wasn't a journalist willing to put his name to this drivel! Do you see what you've done? Set all these holier than thou "people" on someone for putting THE OTHER side across. Expect a FORMAL complaint from me.

P.S. whether or not my conputer skills are alright, this took me AN HOUR to type and funnily enough, no I don't have arthritis yet but give it a year and it'll be here. I use my left hand FOR EVERYTHING
have read some wonderful inspirational stories this week about people who continue to work and live active lives in spite of horrendous injuries.
There is always someone worse off than yourself and self pity is not good for you or others around you.
You say you have poor short term memory, I have been diagonosed with early onset progressive brain problems (cannot still bring myself to use the word). It takes me ages to write anything, it would be easy not to bother and easy to give up work and grisle, but, frankly, sh*t happens, you just have to get on with it.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree