Health fears over stench from Willments Shipyard blaze

Smoke rises from the burning waste mountain

Smoke rises from the burning waste mountain

First published in News Daily Echo: Photograph of the Author by , Politics and business reporter

IT is a smouldering mountain of waste that has been burning for more than two weeks.

So strong is the stench from the fire buried deep within the 9,000 tonne waste pile in Southampton that residents have been complaining of sore throats and eyes.

Now questions are being asked by “scared” householders and businesses about whether they could actually be at risk and if the materials could be hazardous for their health.

Despite attempts to smother the fire at Willments Shipyard in Woolston with earth, marina bosses based across the river in Shamrock Quay say it has done nothing to alleviate fumes and foul smells.

The fire in the Hazel Road waste heap flared up on September 28 by self-combustion with a mix of shredded wood, soil and demolition waste catching alight, firefighters said.

And while complaints of residents feeling unwell have been received by the council, they say they have not been made aware of any health risks.

Health protection chiefs said that smoke can be an irritant, particularly to asthmatics who are being told to carry their inhalers. They also urged people to “limit” the time they are exposed to the fumes.

But the advice is not enough to reassure people in Shamrock Quay, downwind from the site of the fire.

Anna Wyse, environmental policy manager at MDL Marinas, said her staff were very concerned.

She said: “The staff are scared about what is in the heap – does it have materials that are hazardous?

They are scared about what they could be inhaling and what is getting into their skin – is the smoke carcinogenic?

“We are trying to operate as a business and there is a toxic heap burning away. We never thought it would last this long. It has a really acrid smell.”

One 39-year-old Shamrock Quay resident, who did not want to be named, added: “It stinks most days. You get sore eyes and there is just a constant smell of rubbish. It’s disgusting.

I don’t know how they got the licence.”

A city council spokeswoman said the fire at the waste site was “under control” and being monitored around the clock by the site owners.

She said: “We are unaware of any threat to public health. Should the situation deteriorate and fire again breaks through, Hampshire Fire and Rescue Service would respond and nearby residents would be advised to shut window and doors as considered appropriate.

“Interagency meetings will continue to consider how this complex situation can be fully resolved.”

The Health Protection Agency spokesman added: “Some of the substances present in smoke can irritate the lining of the air passages, the skin and the eyes. Respiratory symptoms include coughing and wheezing, breathlessness, sputum (phlegm) production and chest pain.”

As previously revealed the environment Agency had to stop water from the site running down drains amid fears it may be contaminated by the waste.

Comments (8)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:06pm Mon 15 Oct 12

bazzeroz says...

Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?
Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it? bazzeroz
  • Score: 0

5:35pm Mon 15 Oct 12

cantthinkofone says...

If the heap contains plastics, then there's little doubt that the smoke and/or fumes will be toxic and carcinogenic.

And surely it's very likely that "demolition waste" will contain a significant amount of plastics?
If the heap contains plastics, then there's little doubt that the smoke and/or fumes will be toxic and carcinogenic. And surely it's very likely that "demolition waste" will contain a significant amount of plastics? cantthinkofone
  • Score: 0

5:40pm Mon 15 Oct 12

cantthinkofone says...

bazzeroz wrote:
Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?
It's quite curious that the company responsible aren't named in the article isn't it?

There's a company at that location called Stayton Waste Management. I'd hazard a guess it may be them. Perhaps they have friends at Newsquest.
[quote][p][bold]bazzeroz[/bold] wrote: Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?[/p][/quote]It's quite curious that the company responsible aren't named in the article isn't it? There's a company at that location called Stayton Waste Management. I'd hazard a guess it may be them. Perhaps they have friends at Newsquest. cantthinkofone
  • Score: 0

6:39pm Mon 15 Oct 12

Ginger_cyclist says...

It really does stink, can smell it from the Itchen bridge.
It really does stink, can smell it from the Itchen bridge. Ginger_cyclist
  • Score: 0

7:57pm Mon 15 Oct 12

Sovietobserver says...

cantthinkofone wrote:
bazzeroz wrote:
Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?
It's quite curious that the company responsible aren't named in the article isn't it?

There's a company at that location called Stayton Waste Management. I'd hazard a guess it may be them. Perhaps they have friends at Newsquest.
Stayton Waste Management were the occupiers of this site until seven weeks ago. They stated that the waste was on site when they first took over.
The Environment Agency say that C. I. Collins Ltd were the permit holders before they went into administration in March of this year.
The landlord of the property , is apparently not available to make any comment.
So just who is responsible to deal with the present situation ?
[quote][p][bold]cantthinkofone[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bazzeroz[/bold] wrote: Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?[/p][/quote]It's quite curious that the company responsible aren't named in the article isn't it? There's a company at that location called Stayton Waste Management. I'd hazard a guess it may be them. Perhaps they have friends at Newsquest.[/p][/quote]Stayton Waste Management were the occupiers of this site until seven weeks ago. They stated that the waste was on site when they first took over. The Environment Agency say that C. I. Collins Ltd were the permit holders before they went into administration in March of this year. The landlord of the property , is apparently not available to make any comment. So just who is responsible to deal with the present situation ? Sovietobserver
  • Score: 0

8:29pm Mon 15 Oct 12

cantthinkofone says...

Sovietobserver wrote:
cantthinkofone wrote:
bazzeroz wrote:
Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?
It's quite curious that the company responsible aren't named in the article isn't it?

There's a company at that location called Stayton Waste Management. I'd hazard a guess it may be them. Perhaps they have friends at Newsquest.
Stayton Waste Management were the occupiers of this site until seven weeks ago. They stated that the waste was on site when they first took over.
The Environment Agency say that C. I. Collins Ltd were the permit holders before they went into administration in March of this year.
The landlord of the property , is apparently not available to make any comment.
So just who is responsible to deal with the present situation ?
Hmmm.

There's an angle there for an investigative local reporter that wants to get something good on his/her CV...
[quote][p][bold]Sovietobserver[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]cantthinkofone[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bazzeroz[/bold] wrote: Sounds like a dodgy 'brown envelope' business to me! I live over this side and never knew of this 'heap' in Hazel Road. Who owns/runs this site and got the required permission for it?[/p][/quote]It's quite curious that the company responsible aren't named in the article isn't it? There's a company at that location called Stayton Waste Management. I'd hazard a guess it may be them. Perhaps they have friends at Newsquest.[/p][/quote]Stayton Waste Management were the occupiers of this site until seven weeks ago. They stated that the waste was on site when they first took over. The Environment Agency say that C. I. Collins Ltd were the permit holders before they went into administration in March of this year. The landlord of the property , is apparently not available to make any comment. So just who is responsible to deal with the present situation ?[/p][/quote]Hmmm. There's an angle there for an investigative local reporter that wants to get something good on his/her CV... cantthinkofone
  • Score: 0

9:35pm Mon 15 Oct 12

Sovietobserver says...

cantthinkofone, I believe Patrick Knox, senior reporter , has been already 'on the case '. See his SDE report of 06 Oct.
cantthinkofone, I believe Patrick Knox, senior reporter , has been already 'on the case '. See his SDE report of 06 Oct. Sovietobserver
  • Score: 0

10:01pm Mon 15 Oct 12

Poppy22 says...

And what are our local councillors doing about this???
And what are our local councillors doing about this??? Poppy22
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree