Fluoride RSS Feed


Hampshire's fluoride debate

Thousands sign petition against fluoride in Southampton's water


MORE than 3,000 people have already signed a petition calling for plans to fluoridate Hampshire’s water to be overturned.

Campaigners say they have been delighted with the public response to their bid to stop the chemical being added to the tap water of nearly 200,000 Hampshire residents.

They have also been boosted by a U-turn from one of the Southampton councillors who initially backed the scheme.

Cllr Jeremy Moulton, the prospective Conservative parliamentary candidate for Southampton Test, voted to support fluoridation when the city council examined the proposals last November.

The authority’s support for fluoridation – by 26 to 18 in a free vote - was seen as c r u c i a l , b e c a u s e Southampton was the only council to back the scheme.

Hampshire, Eastleigh, New Forest and Test Valley councils all passed motions opposing it.

But the city’s cabinet member for finance says he has now shifted his position, not because of the health case for fluoridation but because of the strength of feeling against it.

“I did vote for fluoridation, after quite a bit of research and after attending some of the scrutiny enquiry debates and listening to all the points of view,” said Cllr Moulton.

“But in light of the overwhelming opposition from the public I do not feel that it should now go ahead.

“I think it is quite wrong that the decision was taken by an unelected and unaccountable quango.”

More than 10,000 people responded to South Central Strategic Health Authority’s (SHA’s) public consultation on the plans, designed to improve poor dental health in Southampton.

Almost three-quarters of those who responded to the questionnaire said they were against it.

But in February, the SHA board voted unanimously to approve the proposals, meaning fluoride could be added to the water supply before the end of next year.

Hampshire Against Fluoridation, which is leading the campaign against the scheme, last month launched a petition it plans to deliver to the Prime Minister to show the strength of opposition.

It has also set up a fighting fund to help finance a potential legal challenge to the SHA’s decision.

“The sense of anger is very tangible, and we had a great many offers of help with our campaign,” said HAF member Caroline Place.

HAF is now planning a public meeting in Woolston on April 25.


Comments(7)

Jenjo says...
10:04pm Fri 10 Apr 09

Jeremy Moulton comes out of this with plenty of credit and his reputation enhanced - there's no problem changing your mind if further information comes to light, in this case the overwhelming public opposition to fluoridation. Now it's time for other councillors to examine their consciences and realise that they are there to reflect public opinion where possible. Moulton has done just that, so he will pick up lots of extra votes at the general election and must now surely be favourite to be the next Southampton Test MP.

Martin Wellbourne says...
8:01am Sat 11 Apr 09

"But the city’s cabinet member for finance (Moulton) says he has now shifted his position, not because of the health case for fluoridation but because of the strength of feeling against it"

That's a poor reason for changing view. Does this mean that he will now always vote the way the public want him to? That isn't how politics should work.

I don't want this poison in my water - but I don't want Moulton simply getting elected on the basis of his flip-flop policy.

Polygonia says...
9:13am Sat 11 Apr 09

If only some other Councillors took as much notice of what public want !
I hope that next year voters will have their say at the ballot box and get rid of those who want fluoride in our water.

goard says...
10:22am Sat 11 Apr 09

FLOURIDE: Sadly one does not know what one is getting in respect of a chosen Party. There is something in new wet behind the ears politians code that they go in banging their drum and before they know it they are put into the tamboreen section. So they sadly are not considered unless they 'conform'. Again, sadly, they are earning a wage, they have probably a family to keep, what would bloggers do? keep the family going. It takes a very strong MP to go against the grain of their chosen politics.This is where 'dirt' comes to mind, not theirs but POLITICS.

goard

Shooter says...
2:54pm Sat 11 Apr 09

hmm... it's quite refreshing to see a councillor admit they made a mistake, but Cllr Moulton seems to take any opportunity for a photocall or sound-bite that will up his rankings.

Going on recent articles that he has been quoted on, I'm sure he would swear black was white if it got a few more votes.

After speaking to friends who work in the Civic Centre, he has ZERO interest whatsoever in football, but he was in front of the Echo cameras 'waving and cheering his support' for the Saints.
He also couldn't have been less interested at the recent Chinese celebrations either, but took the PR opportunity to sit alongside the Mayor, bored out of his mind, but making use of the opportunity to 'show support'. Sorry - I'm not fooled.

I think the old crusties in the local council think rolling out a 'Thirty-something' councillor for every press-call will give people the impression they are modern, fresh and the people's party.

It's just Politicians being politicians, for a few more 'popularity' votes.
Boring.


Big Boy says...
6:29am Sun 12 Apr 09

3,000 out of 200,000 equals 1-1/2%. Hardly am awe inspiring percentage.

Big Boy says...
6:32am Sun 12 Apr 09

Cllr Jeremy Moulton, seems like a typical politician. Altering his view to suit his purpose of getting elected as prospective Conservative parliamentary candidate for Southampton Test. All far too transparent for this old cynic.


Environment Agency wants all homes to fit water meters Thousands sign fluoride petition

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses