We’ve saved thousands by getting on our bikes (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Hampshire fuel-wise family proves a car is not essential
11:33am Tuesday 22nd March 2011 in News
By Bethan Phillips, Reporter
WHEEL GO FAR: Lyn Brayshaw and children Lauren, 10, and Sam, 8, have embraced cycling. Echo picture by Paul Collins Order no: 12103509
For most people with young children, the idea of living without a car is almost inconceivable.
But as the Daily Echo continues its Don’t be a Fuel Fool campaign, one Southampton family has told us how they manage almost all their journeys on two wheels – saving thousands of pounds a year in petrol.
Lyn Brayshaw, her husband Andy Mackensie and their two children Lauren, ten, and Sam, 8, are convinced that a family car is not as necessary as many people think.
Lyn, from Oakmount Avenue, Highfield, said: “It’s really an environmental decision, but it’s the cost as well. I work one day a week, and my husband works four – so we effectively have one wage.
“When I look at the amount people spend on running two cars, I wonder why. We live in a city where there is fairly good transport and you can get around by bike.”
When Sam reached the age of one, the family decided to invest in a bike trailer and since then have got around almost entirely by pedal power alone.
Lyn said: “We used the bike trailer for years, with the two of them in it.
“Then we went on to where you fix a half bike on to the back of an adult bike. Now we’ve got two tandems, which are much cheaper than people think – ours were about £300.
“Lots of the places we go to are actually quicker by bike, because you can do things like cut across the Common.”
Sam has been riding a normal bike without stabilisers since the age of two, and the youngsters now cycle on most roads. Having grown up without a car, Lyn says her children are much more aware of road safety as a result.
Aware
She said: “Children who get in and out of cars to go everywhere have no awareness of the road, or how to get from A to B. Lauren and Sam are out there and aware of what’s going on around them.”
The family has vegetable and fruit boxes delivered weekly and go to the supermarket less than once a month to stock up.
The pair are also home-educated – but still cycle to at least one after-school activity a day.
Lyn added: “From a health point of view, the children are capable of cycling a long way, and it’s good for them.
“It’s completely unnatural for people to be stuck in these metal boxes all the time.
“It’s just a lifestyle choice, but it’s a positive lifestyle choice and there aren’t really disadvantages.”
Comments(13)
mummsie
says...
12:32pm Tue 22 Mar 11
Lone Ranger
says...
1:24pm Tue 22 Mar 11
mummsie wrote:Bikes are NOT for pavements. Ride on the road or dont ride it.
I ride my bike on the pavement but always ring my bell to let other pedestrians that i am approaching. NO WAY would i ride on the busy roads around Southampton and NEVER will !
.
You are a menace and with the potential for an accident with a pedestrian.
.
How does someone hear your bell if they are deaf
wilson castaway
says...
1:28pm Tue 22 Mar 11
DJ Teh
says...
3:26pm Tue 22 Mar 11
Lone Ranger wrote:Well said. I ride a bike and I use the road, and ad-hear to the rules of the road.
mummsie wrote:Bikes are NOT for pavements. Ride on the road or dont ride it.
I ride my bike on the pavement but always ring my bell to let other pedestrians that i am approaching. NO WAY would i ride on the busy roads around Southampton and NEVER will !
.
You are a menace and with the potential for an accident with a pedestrian.
.
How does someone hear your bell if they are deaf
They are death traps like mopeds to pedestrians.
Cue geoff51 and his rant about cyclists being a menace to car drivers.
Speaking from the point of view or a car and bike user, they are as bad as each other.
Last night for example in Shirley I nearly had some idiot off his bike for pulling in front of me off the pavement to go around roadworks, not to mention having no lights (which seems to be all too common amongst people of my age, i'm 20)
And from the other point of view, I've almost been taken out from the side recently by a car not looking at the roundabout as they pulled out but chatting to their passenger while looking out for traffic to their right and not in front of them.
Maine Lobster
says...
4:30pm Tue 22 Mar 11
geoff51
says...
5:01pm Tue 22 Mar 11
All I shall say is that this family is about as far removed from the normal family as is possible nothing of their lifestyle reflects the general population, that is not meant as an insult just a comment on how they live.
Whilst I am all for recycling and living with a natural lifestyle, their way of living would never work in a family with proper jobs and children at school in opposite directions so to hold them up as a pinnacle of ecological living is at least rather false
downfader
says...
5:24pm Tue 22 Mar 11
.
I know a few other people who have given up a car and are now single car families with one member being an almost fulltime cyclist.
.
To keep to the positives of the article can I just say that I know of no trailer-child who has fallen foul of collision on the roads, trailers seem to aid safety as drivers will take more care, they're bigger and more easy to see.
.
Its not about being middle class, well off or poor, its about using something that works, that is more reliable than a bus (as long as you dont buy a cheap 60 quid argos jobbie, LOL).
.
I also seem to remember that there was an article in one of the papers stating that the average distance between schools for multi-school families is still less than a mile, with around a max of 3. 3 miles is very easy to cycle. In Germany, Belgium and The Netherlands families will cycle up to 5 miles to their schools. I dont see why we here in the UK with our better weather, less severe hills, etc, cant take a leaf out of their book.
Spot O'Bother
says...
7:59pm Tue 22 Mar 11
downfader
says...
8:07pm Tue 22 Mar 11
Spot O'Bother wrote:So..?
Downfader, Holland is flat & the weather here is not better, it's worse!
I did mention Germany in the same sentance. France also has mountains and cycling is much more popular there, people actively seek out the gradients to test themselves also.
.
I would strongly disagree on the weather front. Having spoken to Dutch people their winters are typically much colder, a lot more snow and it rains more during the summer.
.
The worst we have to contend with is a few showers and a bit of frost at winter time. I rode all through this winter with little problem, its all about preparation imo.
Bowmore
says...
8:36pm Tue 22 Mar 11
solomum
says...
9:43pm Tue 22 Mar 11
mummsie wrote:Actually, its illegal to ride on the pavement and attracts a £30 fine. We need cycle paths
I ride my bike on the pavement but always ring my bell to let other pedestrians that i am approaching. NO WAY would i ride on the busy roads around Southampton and NEVER will !
downfader
says...
6:13am Wed 23 Mar 11
solomum wrote:The FPN is £30. If the Police deicide to take it further (it has happened) you can end up in court with a £500 fine from a Magistrate.
mummsie wrote: I ride my bike on the pavement but always ring my bell to let other pedestrians that i am approaching. NO WAY would i ride on the busy roads around Southampton and NEVER will !Actually, its illegal to ride on the pavement and attracts a £30 fine. We need cycle paths
.
I would also argue you don't always need cyclepaths. Dedicated, traffic free routes can help yes... but these need to be created properly, be wide enough to overtake slower cyclists and have a good surfacing (eg work like Euro lanes).
.
20mph limits also work better than off-road provision and is cheaper for councils to impliment iirc. Its safer for pedestrians too, especially children who are proven to struggle to read traffic speed above 20 (research published last year).
derek james says...
12:10pm Tue 22 Mar 11