"

southy wrote:

Linesman wrote:
With the millions that the Saul Zaentz Company has, I would suggest that the compromise should be that the $100 goes to a local charity.

Does the Saul Zaentz Company really need another $100 dollars?

They been back into a corner Linesman, a few Historians e-mail there Lawers, and told them to check refences books (not the web sites but books) about all the names and what they mean and where they come from, check maps for locations names ect.
This $100 USD is just way for them to save face, and once the landlord of the pub pays it, they will be corned them selfs and will have to pay it every year and Saul Zaentz Company will increase how much they got to pay. (once you give them money, you are agreeing with them that they do own the full rights)
I reply would be a no to any payment not even for 1/2 cent. and I would tell them to come to the UK and take it to court, knowing to-well they would lose, and would put them wide open to be sued.

'They been back into a corner Linesman, a few Historians e-mail there Lawers, and told them to check refences books (not the web sites but books) about all the names and what they mean and where they come from, check maps for locations names ect.'

How do you know the above happened?

If you found out, tell us how, or did you guess or just go & make it up pretending you are in the know."