Gordon Brown to resign as Labour leader (From Daily Echo)
When news happens, text SDE and your photos or videos to 80360. Or contact us by email and phone.
Gordon Brown to resign as Labour leader
5:10pm Monday 10th May 2010 in News By Echo Reporter
Gordon Brown to resign as Labour leader
Premier Gordon Brown has announced he is to resign as Labour leader.
Speaking outside 10 Downing Street Mr Brown said he intended to stand down as Labour leader "in the national interest".
Mr Brown said he would ask the Labour Party to set in train the processes for a leadership election and he would not be standing.
He said he wanted his successor to be in place by the time the Labour Party meets for its annual conference, this September.
Bookies have made Southampton Itchen MP John Denham 33-1 to take over at the head of the party, behind favourite David Miliband.
Mr Brown said: "There is a progressive majority in Britain and I believe it could be in the interests of the whole country to form a progressive coalition government.
"In addition to the economic priorities, in my view, only such a progressive government could meet the demand for political and electoral change which the British people made last Thursday.
"If it becomes clear that the national interest, which is stable and principled government, can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty, support that government which would, in my view, command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's Speech and any other confidence votes.
"But I have no desire to stay in my position longer than is needed to ensure the path to economic growth is assured and the process of political reform we have agreed moves forward quickly.
“The reason that we have a hung parliament is that no single party and no single leader was able to win the full support of the country.
"As leader of my party I must accept that as a judgement on me.
“I therefore intend to ask the Labour Party to set in train the processes needed for its own leadership election.
"I would hope that it would be completed in time for the new leader to be in post by the time of the Labour Party conference. "I will play no part in that contest, I will back no individual candidate."
Comments(24)
allsaintsnocurves
says...
5:35pm Mon 10 May 10
Condor Man
says...
5:40pm Mon 10 May 10
freefinker
says...
5:43pm Mon 10 May 10
Condor Man wrote:No, that prize goes to the war criminal Blair
what a great day, the end of a man who has damaged this country more than any PM in living memory
Allotment man 66
says...
5:45pm Mon 10 May 10
Wrong man for the job, To old to grey, and out of touch.
It's a young man job.
David Miliband for me. and John Denham in second place
Condor Man
says...
5:48pm Mon 10 May 10
freefinker wrote:No, has to be Brown as Blair gave him a free hand to wreck the economy from 1997. Blair wasn't really a PM, he was just a figure head. It was Brown that dominated home policy and the results speak for themselves.
Condor Man wrote: what a great day, the end of a man who has damaged this country more than any PM in living memoryNo, that prize goes to the war criminal Blair
OSPREYSAINT
says...
5:50pm Mon 10 May 10
soton1980
says...
5:56pm Mon 10 May 10
Lone Ranger
says...
5:59pm Mon 10 May 10
.........
.
"If it becomes clear that the national interest, which is stable and principled government, can be best served by forming a coalition between the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats, then I believe I should discharge that duty, support that government which would, in my view, command a majority in the House of Commons in the Queen's Speech and any other confidence votes.
.
So he steps down and you possibly get Lab/Lib plus one or two others forming the government
freefinker
says...
6:02pm Mon 10 May 10
Condor Man wrote:So, you think the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi deaths caused by Blair have not seriously damaged this country? You are looking through your usual blinkered spectacles again.
freefinker wrote:No, has to be Brown as Blair gave him a free hand to wreck the economy from 1997. Blair wasn't really a PM, he was just a figure head. It was Brown that dominated home policy and the results speak for themselves.
Condor Man wrote: what a great day, the end of a man who has damaged this country more than any PM in living memoryNo, that prize goes to the war criminal Blair
Perhaps you have forgotten what Mohammad Sidique Khan said in his suicide video. All our domestic islamic terrorism is down to the criminal Blair. All the erosion of civil liberties is down to Blair.
The economy will recover, but the damage done by Blair to our standing in the world will last for generations.
damien thorn
says...
6:07pm Mon 10 May 10
blackjack6522
says...
6:14pm Mon 10 May 10
Labour is for the working person !
we know need to watch out for the fall out from it all.................
.
Iw61
says...
6:19pm Mon 10 May 10
But dont tell me Brown was the worst PM ever. What rubbish!! If he was that bad why didnt Cameron get a thumping majority? He didnt because was possibly the worst opposition leader in history!!
John Major in my view has that title as worst PM. Look at the 1997 election result?
Please!!Stroll on CondorMan
Brite Spark
says...
6:26pm Mon 10 May 10
He's a Brite Spark and knows his stuff.
Lone Ranger
says...
6:32pm Mon 10 May 10
.
The Cons and Airbrush Dave must be getting close to being gutted
Highway to Hartlepool
says...
7:18pm Mon 10 May 10
OSPREYSAINT wrote:Vote Balls - we will **** it up!
Balls for PM. Always wanted to say that.
EELS MAN
says...
7:47pm Mon 10 May 10
fiasco.
Even an election observer from little African country said on the radio 'that it is funny because the British always condemn the rest of the world for shoddy elections & now we are the shoddy looking ones.
Thanks Gordo you git!
Mike_Saint
says...
8:08pm Mon 10 May 10
freefinker wrote:W*****s the pair of you!
Condor Man wrote: what a great day, the end of a man who has damaged this country more than any PM in living memoryNo, that prize goes to the war criminal Blair
barmypom
says...
5:43am Tue 11 May 10
Iw61 wrote:Wake up you Labour plonker.
Im glad Brown has gone.
But dont tell me Brown was the worst PM ever. What rubbish!! If he was that bad why didnt Cameron get a thumping majority? He didnt because was possibly the worst opposition leader in history!!
John Major in my view has that title as worst PM. Look at the 1997 election result?
Please!!Stroll on CondorMan
Why do you think Cameron didn't get a thumping majority? It's because Blair and Brown have engineered a guaranteed voter base over the last 13 years through social engineering, welfare handouts, uncontrolled immigration. and 'dumbing down' of the population.
Skilled workers have also left Britain in droves over the last few years, denting the Conservative voter base.
The reason why a Labour govt is so **** hard to get rid of is because collectively, the people of this country have become stupid.
Average Labour voter IQ tends to be less that Tory voter IQ. It's fact that IQ and fertility are negatively correlated....one reason why Labour voters (or people with lower IQ) outbreed the rest of the population.
This is why we didn't get a Tory landslide....it's because Labour can do no wrong.
EELS MAN
says...
6:07am Tue 11 May 10
barmypom wrote:Here Here!
Iw61 wrote: Im glad Brown has gone. But dont tell me Brown was the worst PM ever. What rubbish!! If he was that bad why didnt Cameron get a thumping majority? He didnt because was possibly the worst opposition leader in history!! John Major in my view has that title as worst PM. Look at the 1997 election result? Please!!Stroll on CondorManWake up you Labour plonker. Why do you think Cameron didn't get a thumping majority? It's because Blair and Brown have engineered a guaranteed voter base over the last 13 years through social engineering, welfare handouts, uncontrolled immigration. and 'dumbing down' of the population. Skilled workers have also left Britain in droves over the last few years, denting the Conservative voter base. The reason why a Labour govt is so **** hard to get rid of is because collectively, the people of this country have become stupid. Average Labour voter IQ tends to be less that Tory voter IQ. It's fact that IQ and fertility are negatively correlated....one reason why Labour voters (or people with lower IQ) outbreed the rest of the population. This is why we didn't get a Tory landslide....it's because Labour can do no wrong.
Facewagon
says...
8:34am Tue 11 May 10
barmypom wrote:Wow, science in action. Evidence?
Iw61 wrote: Im glad Brown has gone. But dont tell me Brown was the worst PM ever. What rubbish!! If he was that bad why didnt Cameron get a thumping majority? He didnt because was possibly the worst opposition leader in history!! John Major in my view has that title as worst PM. Look at the 1997 election result? Please!!Stroll on CondorManWake up you Labour plonker. Why do you think Cameron didn't get a thumping majority? It's because Blair and Brown have engineered a guaranteed voter base over the last 13 years through social engineering, welfare handouts, uncontrolled immigration. and 'dumbing down' of the population. Skilled workers have also left Britain in droves over the last few years, denting the Conservative voter base. The reason why a Labour govt is so **** hard to get rid of is because collectively, the people of this country have become stupid. Average Labour voter IQ tends to be less that Tory voter IQ. It's fact that IQ and fertility are negatively correlated....one reason why Labour voters (or people with lower IQ) outbreed the rest of the population. This is why we didn't get a Tory landslide....it's because Labour can do no wrong.
Lone Ranger
says...
9:05am Tue 11 May 10
Facewagon wrote:I am sure that you can read the full story in The Sun !!!!!
barmypom wrote:Wow, science in action. Evidence?
Iw61 wrote: Im glad Brown has gone. But dont tell me Brown was the worst PM ever. What rubbish!! If he was that bad why didnt Cameron get a thumping majority? He didnt because was possibly the worst opposition leader in history!! John Major in my view has that title as worst PM. Look at the 1997 election result? Please!!Stroll on CondorManWake up you Labour plonker. Why do you think Cameron didn't get a thumping majority? It's because Blair and Brown have engineered a guaranteed voter base over the last 13 years through social engineering, welfare handouts, uncontrolled immigration. and 'dumbing down' of the population. Skilled workers have also left Britain in droves over the last few years, denting the Conservative voter base. The reason why a Labour govt is so **** hard to get rid of is because collectively, the people of this country have become stupid. Average Labour voter IQ tends to be less that Tory voter IQ. It's fact that IQ and fertility are negatively correlated....one reason why Labour voters (or people with lower IQ) outbreed the rest of the population. This is why we didn't get a Tory landslide....it's because Labour can do no wrong.
Linesman
says...
9:13am Tue 11 May 10
Remember Maestrict!
His had bad luck during his period as Prime Minister, with the Foot and Mouth outbreak coming within a couple of weeks of him taking charge. That was dealt with, to be followed by Swine Flu, and so it continued with the International financial crisis, which began in the USA and spread world-wide, being the last.
If you want a TV personality to run the country, well Cameron and Clegg fit the bill.
Obviously the majority considered that they did not want a Statesman, which is why Brown has decided to step down.
Thank you Gordon for the minimum wage, the new hospitals and schools and putting an end to hunting with hounds, amongst other things.
Should Cameron take charge, my betting is that he will place more importance on hunting than housing!
Foxes beware.
southy
says...
11:04am Tue 11 May 10
Lone Ranger wrote:very true lone and we all know that sun would not print the truth being a tory party and a very large donate to the tory party.
Facewagon wrote:I am sure that you can read the full story in The Sun !!!!!
barmypom wrote:Wow, science in action. Evidence?
Iw61 wrote: Im glad Brown has gone. But dont tell me Brown was the worst PM ever. What rubbish!! If he was that bad why didnt Cameron get a thumping majority? He didnt because was possibly the worst opposition leader in history!! John Major in my view has that title as worst PM. Look at the 1997 election result? Please!!Stroll on CondorManWake up you Labour plonker. Why do you think Cameron didn't get a thumping majority? It's because Blair and Brown have engineered a guaranteed voter base over the last 13 years through social engineering, welfare handouts, uncontrolled immigration. and 'dumbing down' of the population. Skilled workers have also left Britain in droves over the last few years, denting the Conservative voter base. The reason why a Labour govt is so **** hard to get rid of is because collectively, the people of this country have become stupid. Average Labour voter IQ tends to be less that Tory voter IQ. It's fact that IQ and fertility are negatively correlated....one reason why Labour voters (or people with lower IQ) outbreed the rest of the population. This is why we didn't get a Tory landslide....it's because Labour can do no wrong.
more to the point lo i think barmypom has forgotten the torys had 18 years, and every day of all those years was nothing but destruction. the torys engineered there own destruction, a destruction whitch more than likey will mean the last time we will see them have any sort of power has they fad in to the history books
mr angreee says...
5:20pm Mon 10 May 10