Saints manager out to rewrite history (From Daily Echo)

hedge end bob wrote:
You see KENTY BOY it can be done, although your lot could not do it, that's where class comes in.

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

kent141 wrote:

hedge end bob wrote:
You see KENTY BOY it can be done, although your lot could not do it, that's where class comes in.

Still talking to yourself i see bob.

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

Scurness wrote:
Adkins is a bumder

Alicesdad wrote:
ALICESDAD HAS DECIDED TO REWRITE HISTORY.

I am rewriting it as follows:

Man City 0 Saints 124
Saints 239 Wigan 0
Saints 328 Man Utd 0
Arsenal 0 Saints 349
Saints 4 Aston Villa 1
Everton 0 Saints 3499
Saints 2398 Fulham 2398
West Ham 0 Saints 1003
Saints 678 Spurs 0
West Brom 0 Saints 56

The Echo savages our defence for letting a goal in against Aston Villa. Adkins is threatened with the sack after the 2398-All draw against Fulham and 1457 of the goals are blamed on Fox on the Echo website even though he was substituted after the first 453. Adkins has a chat with Cortese by the vending machine and the Echo reports they have had Crunchie talks.

Elsewhere, Harold Rednap has closed his dogs' bank account with Lloyds Bank after they refused to pay out on mis sold repayment insurance.

SaintDon13 wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

That totally discredits anything you say.

SaintDon13 wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

Now I wonder who you could be? Answers on a postcard.

gazw1976 wrote:
ok im Rupert lol. or Matt le tiss having another pop at the don

SFCOLDBOY wrote:

Alicesdad wrote:
ALICESDAD HAS DECIDED TO REWRITE HISTORY.

I am rewriting it as follows:

Man City 0 Saints 124
Saints 239 Wigan 0
Saints 328 Man Utd 0
Arsenal 0 Saints 349
Saints 4 Aston Villa 1
Everton 0 Saints 3499
Saints 2398 Fulham 2398
West Ham 0 Saints 1003
Saints 678 Spurs 0
West Brom 0 Saints 56

The Echo savages our defence for letting a goal in against Aston Villa. Adkins is threatened with the sack after the 2398-All draw against Fulham and 1457 of the goals are blamed on Fox on the Echo website even though he was substituted after the first 453. Adkins has a chat with Cortese by the vending machine and the Echo reports they have had Crunchie talks.

Elsewhere, Harold Rednap has closed his dogs' bank account with Lloyds Bank after they refused to pay out on mis sold repayment insurance.

Alicesdad,
I seems like you have been sniffing Alicescat litter, again.
It seem to be effecting you.

Yours respectfully,

SFCOLDBOY.

p.s. Stick to beer.

Alicesdad wrote:
ALICESDAD HAS DECIDED TO REWRITE HISTORY.

I am rewriting it as follows:

Man City 0 Saints 124
Saints 239 Wigan 0
Saints 328 Man Utd 0
Arsenal 0 Saints 349
Saints 4 Aston Villa 1
Everton 0 Saints 3499
Saints 2398 Fulham 2398
West Ham 0 Saints 1003
Saints 678 Spurs 0
West Brom 0 Saints 56

The Echo savages our defence for letting a goal in against Aston Villa. Adkins is threatened with the sack after the 2398-All draw against Fulham and 1457 of the goals are blamed on Fox on the Echo website even though he was substituted after the first 453. Adkins has a chat with Cortese by the vending machine and the Echo reports they have had Crunchie talks.

Elsewhere, Harold Rednap has closed his dogs' bank account with Lloyds Bank after they refused to pay out on mis sold repayment insurance.

Scurness wrote:
Adkins is a bumder

kent141 wrote:

Scurness wrote:
Adkins is a bumder

im sure he is.

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

Clausentum Saint wrote:
Nigel Adkins should remain in charge at Saints and should be given full support.He,the team,the club,the supporters are on a mission,it may be having a bumpy ride at this moment but I have absolutely no doubt that 'Saints'
are going to come good!! In anticipation of greater things to come I can honestly admit that I am quite excited.
COYR'S

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

Clausentum Saint wrote:
Nigel Adkins should remain in charge at Saints and should be given full support.He,the team,the club,the supporters are on a mission,it may be having a bumpy ride at this moment but I have absolutely no doubt that 'Saints'
are going to come good!! In anticipation of greater things to come I can honestly admit that I am quite excited.
COYR'S

SaintDon13 wrote:

gazw1976 wrote: the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

Now I wonder who you could be? Answers on a postcard.

Rising_Son wrote:
I see kent141 is claiming to be both Hedge End Bob and gazw1976. His versatility knows no bounds.

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

Mush On The Beach wrote:
On paper it looks like a mouth watering game tomorrow against the Swans. Both teams like to play possession football and will go for it in attack. This could be the start of something special on the Prem calendar each year for the purists around the country. The EPL version of El Classico.

Look out for Michu, we need to mark him out of the game. I said previously that Baggies had the bargain loan signing of the year in Romelu Lukaku, I would say Swansea have the bargain signing of the year (2 million) with this lad, class.

Alicesdad wrote:
ALICESDAD HAS DECIDED TO REWRITE HISTORY.

I am rewriting it as follows:

Man City 0 Saints 124
Saints 239 Wigan 0
Saints 328 Man Utd 0
Arsenal 0 Saints 349
Saints 4 Aston Villa 1
Everton 0 Saints 3499
Saints 2398 Fulham 2398
West Ham 0 Saints 1003
Saints 678 Spurs 0
West Brom 0 Saints 56

The Echo savages our defence for letting a goal in against Aston Villa. Adkins is threatened with the sack after the 2398-All draw against Fulham and 1457 of the goals are blamed on Fox on the Echo website even though he was substituted after the first 453. Adkins has a chat with Cortese by the vending machine and the Echo reports they have had Crunchie talks.

Elsewhere, Harold Rednap has closed his dogs' bank account with Lloyds Bank after they refused to pay out on mis sold repayment insurance.

SO50 Saint wrote:
What makes it more annoying is there was a lot of talk of us signing him before he went to Swansea Mush no doubt he will score tomorrow looks class with what i've seen so far this season

Mush On The Beach wrote:
On paper it looks like a mouth watering game tomorrow against the Swans. Both teams like to play possession football and will go for it in attack. This could be the start of something special on the Prem calendar each year for the purists around the country. The EPL version of El Classico.

Look out for Michu, we need to mark him out of the game. I said previously that Baggies had the bargain loan signing of the year in Romelu Lukaku, I would say Swansea have the bargain signing of the year (2 million) with this lad, class.

gazw1976 wrote:

SaintDon13 wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

That totally discredits anything you say.

how does protecting staff make it less believable , maybe if the echo talked to staff they may get some written to fill their rag with

SO50 Saint wrote:
What makes it more annoying is there was a lot of talk of us signing him before he went to Swansea Mush no doubt he will score tomorrow looks class with what i've seen so far this season

Storm Shadow wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:
On paper it looks like a mouth watering game tomorrow against the Swans. Both teams like to play possession football and will go for it in attack. This could be the start of something special on the Prem calendar each year for the purists around the country. The EPL version of El Classico.

Look out for Michu, we need to mark him out of the game. I said previously that Baggies had the bargain loan signing of the year in Romelu Lukaku, I would say Swansea have the bargain signing of the year (2 million) with this lad, class.

mouthwatering! are you a swansea fan ? I bet there looking forward to it.

Laugishing 11th in the table on 12 points having beaten West Ham, QPR and Wigan. Held Chelsea to a draw.

They must be really worried.

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

Storm Shadow wrote:
Hoping Seedhouse does not post any more of his wors of wisdom today bring shame to the club and fans.

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

Velleity wrote:

Clausentum Saint wrote:
Nigel Adkins should remain in charge at Saints and should be given full support.He,the team,the club,the supporters are on a mission,it may be having a bumpy ride at this moment but I have absolutely no doubt that 'Saints'
are going to come good!! In anticipation of greater things to come I can honestly admit that I am quite excited.
COYR'S

Me too - we simply HAVE to get behind the team. Leave the Thomasuptons and his ilk to sulk alone and call us happy clappers. Nothing, but nothing should stop us getting behind OUR TEAM.

Shout your lung out tomorrow - watch the team's heads lift and we'll help them to get us moving in the right direction.

Storm Shadow wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:
On paper it looks like a mouth watering game tomorrow against the Swans. Both teams like to play possession football and will go for it in attack. This could be the start of something special on the Prem calendar each year for the purists around the country. The EPL version of El Classico.

Look out for Michu, we need to mark him out of the game. I said previously that Baggies had the bargain loan signing of the year in Romelu Lukaku, I would say Swansea have the bargain signing of the year (2 million) with this lad, class.

mouthwatering! are you a swansea fan ? I bet there looking forward to it.

Laugishing 11th in the table on 12 points having beaten West Ham, QPR and Wigan. Held Chelsea to a draw.

They must be really worried.

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

Normandy wrote:
A few comments
I have been a Saint supporter for 40 years so bear this in mind when i say:
NA has done up to this season a great job and is a honorable and likeable man
He made very bad mistakes in subs over several games.
He if as i think had some input has made some very bad choices in starting line ups especially defence changing goal keepers and buying new players.
It is very impresive and touching the loyalty of the posts on the DE forums
but to critisise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions.
I hope with all my heart we win Saturday but if again we lose NA should go, Who will come in you will ask
Well i wanted GS but it looks like Scotland will have him so i say
i do not know but it cannot get any worse if we carryon loosing with NA things can only get better, i do not want us to go down and if you say you prefer to go down with NA rather than without him then with all respect you are NOT a Saints fan but a NA groppie
I hope you turn it around NA but now
if we lose Saturday something must change for the sake of the club
Roll on your comments on how NA is great i fo not care, i care about SFC
end of story

St Retford wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:
On paper it looks like a mouth watering game tomorrow against the Swans. Both teams like to play possession football and will go for it in attack. This could be the start of something special on the Prem calendar each year for the purists around the country. The EPL version of El Classico.

Look out for Michu, we need to mark him out of the game. I said previously that Baggies had the bargain loan signing of the year in Romelu Lukaku, I would say Swansea have the bargain signing of the year (2 million) with this lad, class.

Swansea reminds me a lot of Southampton. I think it's the utilitarian municipal architecture and the beauty of the surrounding countryside that does it. I genuinely wish them every success this year.

(Although our need is greater than theirs so three points would be immense, please.)

Storm Shadow wrote:
Saints manager out to rewrite history?

W8 D1 L1

Gone by monday, thank god.

Normandy wrote:
A few comments
I have been a Saint supporter for 40 years so bear this in mind when i say:
NA has done up to this season a great job and is a honorable and likeable man
He made very bad mistakes in subs over several games.
He if as i think had some input has made some very bad choices in starting line ups especially defence changing goal keepers and buying new players.
It is very impresive and touching the loyalty of the posts on the DE forums
but to critisise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions.
I hope with all my heart we win Saturday but if again we lose NA should go, Who will come in you will ask
Well i wanted GS but it looks like Scotland will have him so i say
i do not know but it cannot get any worse if we carryon loosing with NA things can only get better, i do not want us to go down and if you say you prefer to go down with NA rather than without him then with all respect you are NOT a Saints fan but a NA groppie
I hope you turn it around NA but now
if we lose Saturday something must change for the sake of the club
Roll on your comments on how NA is great i fo not care, i care about SFC
end of story

St Retford wrote:
Do not go gentle into that good night, Saints fans.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

hedge end bob wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

Yea i heard the same thing on my bus, cant say what cleaner it was he might get the push..........get real!!

Mush On The Beach wrote:

St Retford wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:
On paper it looks like a mouth watering game tomorrow against the Swans. Both teams like to play possession football and will go for it in attack. This could be the start of something special on the Prem calendar each year for the purists around the country. The EPL version of El Classico.

Look out for Michu, we need to mark him out of the game. I said previously that Baggies had the bargain loan signing of the year in Romelu Lukaku, I would say Swansea have the bargain signing of the year (2 million) with this lad, class.

Swansea reminds me a lot of Southampton. I think it's the utilitarian municipal architecture and the beauty of the surrounding countryside that does it. I genuinely wish them every success this year.

(Although our need is greater than theirs so three points would be immense, please.)

We got bombed all through the war though, what's their excuse?

DisplacedFan wrote:

St Retford wrote:
Do not go gentle into that good night, Saints fans.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Half and League, half a league, half a league onward into the Valley of Death rode the (the Saints onward!).
COYR.

Velleity wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

If you translate that into English, I'll read it.

Confucious wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:
I see kent141 is claiming to be both Hedge End Bob and gazw1976. His versatility knows no bounds.

Interesting. This is known as dissociative identity disorder with two or multiple personalities.

Often caused by trauma in childhood it is frequently accompanied by depression, bi-polarism and substance abuse. Sufferers display severe memory impairment well beyond normal forgetfullness.

They often accuse others of abuse owing to distortion in their memory recovery. They will also sincerely deny a crime or misdemeanor as it was committed by a different identity state.

Keep him on here so we can study his behaviour.

St Retford wrote:

DisplacedFan wrote:

St Retford wrote:
Do not go gentle into that good night, Saints fans.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Half and League, half a league, half a league onward into the Valley of Death rode the (the Saints onward!).
COYR.

Hurrah! Someone's got the Dylan Thomas reference. I was going to turn this thread into a tribute to Swansea's literary heritage but I managed him, Cerys from Catatonia (who isn't even from Swansea) and then sort of run out of steam.

Did Catherine Zeta Jones ever write a book?

Mush On The Beach wrote:

St Retford wrote:

DisplacedFan wrote:

St Retford wrote:
Do not go gentle into that good night, Saints fans.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Half and League, half a league, half a league onward into the Valley of Death rode the (the Saints onward!).
COYR.

Hurrah! Someone's got the Dylan Thomas reference. I was going to turn this thread into a tribute to Swansea's literary heritage but I managed him, Cerys from Catatonia (who isn't even from Swansea) and then sort of run out of steam.

Did Catherine Zeta Jones ever write a book?

Good effort. I only know Barry Island Welsh literature:
Tidy, Do you want an omelette, Oh Oh Oh, Skunts are going down to League 2 ...... CRACKING!!!!

SaintDon13 wrote:

Storm Shadow wrote:
Hoping Seedhouse does not post any more of his wors of wisdom today bring shame to the club and fans.

He has never done so yet unlike your good self.

randre wrote:

hedge end bob wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

Yea i heard the same thing on my bus, cant say what cleaner it was he might get the push..........get real!!

I heard the same rumour. I was in my local pub and I happened to be talking to a guy who knows somebody who empties the garbage for somebody else who happens to be a postman and he happens to deliver the letters to somebody else who does dog grooming for somebody else who owns a dog and walks it in the New Forest who happened to meet somebody who said they worked in the Finance department at St Mary's and he said they were not paying their builders and other bills.... Reliable sources guys... remember you heard it here.

SaintDon13 wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

I don't see the point you trying to make, I doubt if anyone on here would have any idea about the finances of the Club, so would not be in any position to say anything. You are making mischief but seem to basing your opinion on hearsay.

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

SaintDon13 wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

I don't see the point you trying to make, I doubt if anyone on here would have any idea about the finances of the Club, so would not be in any position to say anything. You are making mischief but seem to basing your opinion on hearsay.

a story in the echo actually.said about the loan cortese negotiated on behalf of the club .details of said loan apparently lodged at companys house.

st1halo wrote:

randre wrote:

hedge end bob wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

Yea i heard the same thing on my bus, cant say what cleaner it was he might get the push..........get real!!

I heard the same rumour. I was in my local pub and I happened to be talking to a guy who knows somebody who empties the garbage for somebody else who happens to be a postman and he happens to deliver the letters to somebody else who does dog grooming for somebody else who owns a dog and walks it in the New Forest who happened to meet somebody who said they worked in the Finance department at St Mary's and he said they were not paying their builders and other bills.... Reliable sources guys... remember you heard it here.

Sorry randre, you're talking poopoo, the dog walker in the Forest happened to meet somebody who said they worked in the Finance department at Fratton!, Not St.Mary's, I know this cos the vet that treated the dog also treated my best friends mothers cat and he told th person in the pub that you originally spoke to, so get your facts right mate.
Thinking about it though, it could be bull mud! I don't think there is a Finance Dept. at Fratton, just a hot dog stand and that's going into liquidation
Anyway, wish some people would stop talking cr@p! At least I know Im talking FACT!!!!

STID

Rising_Son wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

SaintDon13 wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

I don't see the point you trying to make, I doubt if anyone on here would have any idea about the finances of the Club, so would not be in any position to say anything. You are making mischief but seem to basing your opinion on hearsay.

a story in the echo actually.said about the loan cortese negotiated on behalf of the club .details of said loan apparently lodged at companys house.

Which would mean we have enough money to pay the builders.

randre wrote:

st1halo wrote:

randre wrote:

hedge end bob wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .

Yea i heard the same thing on my bus, cant say what cleaner it was he might get the push..........get real!!

I heard the same rumour. I was in my local pub and I happened to be talking to a guy who knows somebody who empties the garbage for somebody else who happens to be a postman and he happens to deliver the letters to somebody else who does dog grooming for somebody else who owns a dog and walks it in the New Forest who happened to meet somebody who said they worked in the Finance department at St Mary's and he said they were not paying their builders and other bills.... Reliable sources guys... remember you heard it here.

Sorry randre, you're talking poopoo, the dog walker in the Forest happened to meet somebody who said they worked in the Finance department at Fratton!, Not St.Mary's, I know this cos the vet that treated the dog also treated my best friends mothers cat and he told th person in the pub that you originally spoke to, so get your facts right mate.
Thinking about it though, it could be bull mud! I don't think there is a Finance Dept. at Fratton, just a hot dog stand and that's going into liquidation
Anyway, wish some people would stop talking cr@p! At least I know Im talking FACT!!!!

STID

aah, see that's where Chinese whispers come into play... I think you could well be right... However I do know for FACT that Fratton does have a finance department, it is situated near the Charity Collection tins.

Rising_Son wrote:
Randre, sorry to have to correct you. The Poopey finance departemnt is NOT "situated near the Charity Collection tins." It is the Charity Collection tins.

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

SaintDon13 wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

I don't see the point you trying to make, I doubt if anyone on here would have any idea about the finances of the Club, so would not be in any position to say anything. You are making mischief but seem to basing your opinion on hearsay.

a story in the echo actually.said about the loan cortese negotiated on behalf of the club .details of said loan apparently lodged at companys house.

Which would mean we have enough money to pay the builders.

precisely.i never said anything about the builders.the only building i am interested in the moment is building up a nice number of points to make sure we finish at least 17th at the end of season.i still reckon we will finish 14th. COYR

Rising_Son wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

SaintDon13 wrote:

CB FRY LIVES wrote:

Velleity wrote:

gazw1976 wrote:
the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him , starting to believe all is not well behind the scenes , programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency , builders not getting paid and other bills outstanding , so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are , he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow .

the reason Adkins is safe is cause it will cost money to sack him

> Cheaper than losing the money we'd keep by stayin in the premiership?

programme sellers replaced by cheaper agency

> Cheaper? You have that as fact?

builders not getting paid

> You have that as fact?

and other bills outstanding

> You have that as fact?

so if we stay up more prem money or down parachute payments so to cortese it does not matter where we are ,

> What a load of bull. Parachute payments are meant to go some way towards compensating for loss of income. They are nothing like the size of the pot if we stay up. If nothing else, that discredits all your other points.

he is becoming Rupert Lowe 2 at least when St Markus was here there was someone above him keeping him in check now cortese thinks he is invincible an saints is his cash cow

> Do you really think that an ex-Swiss-banker really needs the money?

the more money a banker has the more money a banker wants.bankers make money for themselves by using other peoples hard earnt cash.how much of his own money has Cortese actually invested in the club.and regarding next seasons premiership money-best case scenario or parachute payments-worse case scenario-hasn't he meant to have mortgaged most of said sums off to obtain a loan with some bank hidden away in some caribean tax haven.said documents relating to said loan were meant to have been lodged at company house a couple of months ago.

I don't see the point you trying to make, I doubt if anyone on here would have any idea about the finances of the Club, so would not be in any position to say anything. You are making mischief but seem to basing your opinion on hearsay.

a story in the echo actually.said about the loan cortese negotiated on behalf of the club .details of said loan apparently lodged at companys house.

Which would mean we have enough money to pay the builders.

precisely.i never said anything about the builders.the only building i am interested in the moment is building up a nice number of points to make sure we finish at least 17th at the end of season.i still reckon we will finish 14th. COYR

True, you never said anything about not paying the builders.

What you seem to be saying is that he wants to get richer and richer by borrowing money and then paying it back with premiership money or parachute payments. I'm afraid that doesn't make much sense to me.

St Retford wrote:

Mush On The Beach wrote:

St Retford wrote:

DisplacedFan wrote:

St Retford wrote:
Do not go gentle into that good night, Saints fans.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Half and League, half a league, half a league onward into the Valley of Death rode the (the Saints onward!).
COYR.

Hurrah! Someone's got the Dylan Thomas reference. I was going to turn this thread into a tribute to Swansea's literary heritage but I managed him, Cerys from Catatonia (who isn't even from Swansea) and then sort of run out of steam.

Did Catherine Zeta Jones ever write a book?

Good effort. I only know Barry Island Welsh literature:
Tidy, Do you want an omelette, Oh Oh Oh, Skunts are going down to League 2 ...... CRACKING!!!!

I bloody love the Welsh accent. Always 'ave done, isn't it?

Rising_Son wrote:

Normandy wrote:
A few comments
I have been a Saint supporter for 40 years so bear this in mind when i say:
NA has done up to this season a great job and is a honorable and likeable man
He made very bad mistakes in subs over several games.
He if as i think had some input has made some very bad choices in starting line ups especially defence changing goal keepers and buying new players.
It is very impresive and touching the loyalty of the posts on the DE forums
but to critisise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions.
I hope with all my heart we win Saturday but if again we lose NA should go, Who will come in you will ask
Well i wanted GS but it looks like Scotland will have him so i say
i do not know but it cannot get any worse if we carryon loosing with NA things can only get better, i do not want us to go down and if you say you prefer to go down with NA rather than without him then with all respect you are NOT a Saints fan but a NA groppie
I hope you turn it around NA but now
if we lose Saturday something must change for the sake of the club
Roll on your comments on how NA is great i fo not care, i care about SFC
end of story

Pots and kettles come to mind. But then you won't say anything negative about my opinion because, as you say, "to criticise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions."

Ted Rogers wrote:

Normandy wrote:
A few comments
I have been a Saint supporter for 40 years so bear this in mind when i say:
NA has done up to this season a great job and is a honorable and likeable man
He made very bad mistakes in subs over several games.
He if as i think had some input has made some very bad choices in starting line ups especially defence changing goal keepers and buying new players.
It is very impresive and touching the loyalty of the posts on the DE forums
but to critisise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions.
I hope with all my heart we win Saturday but if again we lose NA should go, Who will come in you will ask
Well i wanted GS but it looks like Scotland will have him so i say
i do not know but it cannot get any worse if we carryon loosing with NA things can only get better, i do not want us to go down and if you say you prefer to go down with NA rather than without him then with all respect you are NOT a Saints fan but a NA groppie
I hope you turn it around NA but now
if we lose Saturday something must change for the sake of the club
Roll on your comments on how NA is great i fo not care, i care about SFC
end of story

After all that thought you're guilty of exactly the same charge that you level at other posters.
I for one don't care if you've supported Saints for 40 or 4 years (although if it is forty I would expect you to hold slightly more long term views and expectations on the current situation).
Kind of sums up football supporters, put 10 of them in a room and 8 of them could manage England.

St Retford wrote:
Do not go gentle into that good night, Saints fans.

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

Normandy wrote:

Rising_Son wrote:

Normandy wrote:
A few comments
I have been a Saint supporter for 40 years so bear this in mind when i say:
NA has done up to this season a great job and is a honorable and likeable man
He made very bad mistakes in subs over several games.
He if as i think had some input has made some very bad choices in starting line ups especially defence changing goal keepers and buying new players.
It is very impresive and touching the loyalty of the posts on the DE forums
but to critisise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions.
I hope with all my heart we win Saturday but if again we lose NA should go, Who will come in you will ask
Well i wanted GS but it looks like Scotland will have him so i say
i do not know but it cannot get any worse if we carryon loosing with NA things can only get better, i do not want us to go down and if you say you prefer to go down with NA rather than without him then with all respect you are NOT a Saints fan but a NA groppie
I hope you turn it around NA but now
if we lose Saturday something must change for the sake of the club
Roll on your comments on how NA is great i fo not care, i care about SFC
end of story

Pots and kettles come to mind. But then you won't say anything negative about my opinion because, as you say, "to criticise all other opinions is childish and shows a lack of understanding of a diplomatic and equel voice / opinions."

Have you read the comments and do you have a point to make as i cannot see it to either agree or disagree.
You do not agree with my comments
which is fair enough but why?
Explain or stop just comenting just for the sake of it please.

gazw1976 wrote:
from within st marys , cant give a full description incase it gets sources in deep water .