Southampton keen on signing Christchurch's Harry Cornick

Daily Echo: Harry Cornick Harry Cornick

SAINTS and Stoke City are chasing one of the hottest teenage properties in south coast football.

And Bournemouth are also interested in Harry Cornick, who plays for Christchurch in the Sydenhams Premier Division.

The 17-year-old has attracted a number of scouts to Hurn Bridge this season following a string of impressive performances.

The sought-after winger/striker, from Poole, is also currently the subject of seven-day approaches from Dorset non-league rivals Poole Town and Dorchester Town.

However, Kemp says Cornick is keen to continue his studies and could opt to stay with Priory for at least another month before making a decision on his future.

Kemp said: “Stoke have had him watched, AFC Bournemouth have invited him to go to their development academy and Saints have been in touch to say they are going to watch him over the next two weeks to see what they think of him.

“There is a high level of interest.

“The one thing we are very concerned about is that everybody will want to make a buck out of him.

“When you are hot property, you are hot property.

“He doesn’t get paid for us and is on non-contract terms.

“He realises his best option is to be a non-contract player because he is then free to make his own choices.

“The fact is we would like to get a friendly out of whatever happens – if he decides to move on – as well as some recognition and, maybe, a small donation towards our new changing rooms.”

Christchurch have seen former stars Michael Green (Port Vale) and Ben Dickenson (Brighton) earn chances in the professional game in recent years.

But while Kemp believes Cornick is another bright prospect, he says he will not be rushed into a decision.

He added: “I am getting phone calls almost daily.

“I involve his dad in all the chats and I think he has pretty much come to the conclusion that he is going to take a month because there is just so much happening.

“It is very early days.

“The good thing with Christchurch is there is no pressure on him.

“But the general consensus is that – without bigging him up too much – at this age, he is better than Ben Dickenson.”

When asked about Cornick, Paul Groves confirmed Cherries were keen to monitor the local nonleague circuit.

The Cherries boss said: “What you try to do is make sure you cover everything in your area and don’t miss anything in your area.”

Comments (199)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:44am Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Why are they chasing him? is a shoplifter or a burgler running away..?

If not why not pick up the phone or drop by his house and have a chat...I do not see that chasing the poor lad will make him sign, probably frighten the life out of him.

Come on if someone started chasing you up the street would you think they wanted you to a) play for another football team or b) it was a potential mugging.
Why are they chasing him? is a shoplifter or a burgler running away..? If not why not pick up the phone or drop by his house and have a chat...I do not see that chasing the poor lad will make him sign, probably frighten the life out of him. Come on if someone started chasing you up the street would you think they wanted you to a) play for another football team or b) it was a potential mugging. warrens 76

9:47am Fri 7 Sep 12

SFCOLDBOY says...

If this boy is good get him into the best academy in the country.
If this boy is good get him into the best academy in the country. SFCOLDBOY

9:49am Fri 7 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick!
i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints! saintshorse101

9:51am Fri 7 Sep 12

stjimmy76 says...

"Saints have been in touch to say they are going to watch him over the next two weeks to see what they think of him."
So why the headline "Saints chasing youngster"?
"Saints have been in touch to say they are going to watch him over the next two weeks to see what they think of him." So why the headline "Saints chasing youngster"? stjimmy76

9:58am Fri 7 Sep 12

CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger says...

Can he play at CB ???
Can he play at CB ??? CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger

10:13am Fri 7 Sep 12

Confucious says...

I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch. Confucious

10:21am Fri 7 Sep 12

ToastyTea says...

Hands off other clubs, if we want him we get first dibs, for we are the mighty Saints.
Hands off other clubs, if we want him we get first dibs, for we are the mighty Saints. ToastyTea

10:21am Fri 7 Sep 12

CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger says...

That's all well and good Confucious but have we got a baby CB or a freshly w@nked CB ?
That's all well and good Confucious but have we got a baby CB or a freshly w@nked CB ? CharlieGeorgesMissingFinger

10:32am Fri 7 Sep 12

billythesaint says...

Who is Kemp?!
Who is Kemp?! billythesaint

10:46am Fri 7 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick!
i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp? OSPREYSAINT

11:11am Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
"Im out of eastenders" no spandau "both".
[quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]"Im out of eastenders" no spandau "both". warrens 76

11:12am Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
Thank god it is not a Lowe count.
[quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]Thank god it is not a Lowe count. warrens 76

11:35am Fri 7 Sep 12

Alicesdad says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
Thank god it is not a Lowe count.
Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream.

It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning.

It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen.

Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred.

Confucious you have started something here.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]Thank god it is not a Lowe count.[/p][/quote]Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream. It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning. It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen. Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred. Confucious you have started something here. Alicesdad

11:46am Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
Confucius you really are a Master Debater, your prose effortlessly role off the wrist :)
[quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]Confucius you really are a Master Debater, your prose effortlessly role off the wrist :) Mush On The Beach

11:46am Fri 7 Sep 12

gadge60 says...

Why don't Saints have a yearly "x factor" style open day to allow hopefuls to audition. I am not sure who would be the Gary Barlow and I am cetainly not going to make a suggestion as to who would be the Tulisa..............
.....
Why don't Saints have a yearly "x factor" style open day to allow hopefuls to audition. I am not sure who would be the Gary Barlow and I am cetainly not going to make a suggestion as to who would be the Tulisa.............. ..... gadge60

12:28pm Fri 7 Sep 12

st1halo says...

gadge60 wrote:
Why don't Saints have a yearly "x factor" style open day to allow hopefuls to audition. I am not sure who would be the Gary Barlow and I am cetainly not going to make a suggestion as to who would be the Tulisa..............

.....
Can we get Cheryl Cole in ??? Going back to Confucius' post... Ill start on my samples right away if we can!!!


STID
[quote][p][bold]gadge60[/bold] wrote: Why don't Saints have a yearly "x factor" style open day to allow hopefuls to audition. I am not sure who would be the Gary Barlow and I am cetainly not going to make a suggestion as to who would be the Tulisa.............. .....[/p][/quote]Can we get Cheryl Cole in ??? Going back to Confucius' post... Ill start on my samples right away if we can!!! STID st1halo

1:17pm Fri 7 Sep 12

billythesaint says...

warrens 76 wrote:
billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
"Im out of eastenders" no spandau "both".
Can you play centre back?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]"Im out of eastenders" no spandau "both".[/p][/quote]Can you play centre back? billythesaint

1:24pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

Alicesdad wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
Thank god it is not a Lowe count.
Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream.

It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning.

It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen.

Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred.

Confucious you have started something here.
In Oz we have a rule in AFL called the Father Son Rule, where a team has preferential recruiting access to the sons of players who have made a major past contribution to the team.
With that in mind, how is Le Tissier’s son coming on? He banged in a hat full in on Matt’s testimonial.
Ramirez will be having kids soon, remember to lock it in.

Btw, it’s the start of the AFL finals over here, a bit like the Championship play-offs. Please share a positive vibe to assist my beloved Fremantle Dockers on their way to the Premiership.
[quote][p][bold]Alicesdad[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]Thank god it is not a Lowe count.[/p][/quote]Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream. It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning. It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen. Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred. Confucious you have started something here.[/p][/quote]In Oz we have a rule in AFL called the Father Son Rule, where a team has preferential recruiting access to the sons of players who have made a major past contribution to the team. With that in mind, how is Le Tissier’s son coming on? He banged in a hat full in on Matt’s testimonial. Ramirez will be having kids soon, remember to lock it in. Btw, it’s the start of the AFL finals over here, a bit like the Championship play-offs. Please share a positive vibe to assist my beloved Fremantle Dockers on their way to the Premiership. Mush On The Beach

1:36pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Flashin the pan says...

There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.
There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really. Flashin the pan

1:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

SO50 Saint says...

Good point well made Flashin we should be going for top drawer players who are wanted by these teams especially as we are the number 1 team on the south coast. But I do think you have to look at building for the future. I'm sure Mr Cortese will take your advice on board as a supporter who has only just started supporting SFC your views are just as important as anyone elses
Good point well made Flashin we should be going for top drawer players who are wanted by these teams especially as we are the number 1 team on the south coast. But I do think you have to look at building for the future. I'm sure Mr Cortese will take your advice on board as a supporter who has only just started supporting SFC your views are just as important as anyone elses SO50 Saint

2:25pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.
What do you mean by says it all really, can we closely analyse that further as you are our guest?

a) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.


b) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.

c) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.

Better luck in your next reincarnation SKUNT, you may move up the chain and become a cockroach, but hopefully more interesting next time
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.[/p][/quote]What do you mean by says it all really, can we closely analyse that further as you are our guest? a) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.   b) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil. c) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil. Better luck in your next reincarnation SKUNT, you may move up the chain and become a cockroach, but hopefully more interesting next time Mush On The Beach

2:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

angus mc coatup says...

Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
this sort of practise has been going on for some time confucious.
I studied marine biology at uni and a secret set of experiments took place behind closed doors while I was there.
this experiment consisted of the mixing of
sole fish eggs and skate fish sperm, resulting in a hybrid fish they called a skole.

so the next time somebody uses the
term "skate are soles" they are in fact completely anatomically correct
[quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]this sort of practise has been going on for some time confucious. I studied marine biology at uni and a secret set of experiments took place behind closed doors while I was there. this experiment consisted of the mixing of sole fish eggs and skate fish sperm, resulting in a hybrid fish they called a skole. so the next time somebody uses the term "skate are soles" they are in fact completely anatomically correct angus mc coatup

2:51pm Fri 7 Sep 12

St Retford says...

Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman. St Retford

2:53pm Fri 7 Sep 12

St Retford says...

Mind you, she hates it when I swap her chocolate bar wrappers about for a laugh.

It really gets her Snickers in a Twix.
Mind you, she hates it when I swap her chocolate bar wrappers about for a laugh. It really gets her Snickers in a Twix. St Retford

3:04pm Fri 7 Sep 12

CB FRY LIVES says...

billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.
[quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves. CB FRY LIVES

3:04pm Fri 7 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?
i know just playing with his name
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?[/p][/quote]i know just playing with his name saintshorse101

3:06pm Fri 7 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

i think confucious is right, just look at all the great players that have slipped through pompey fans hands!!
i think confucious is right, just look at all the great players that have slipped through pompey fans hands!! saintshorse101

3:11pm Fri 7 Sep 12

right back in the bar says...

Join us and he becomes a better footballer - go to Stoke and he'll think he's in a time warp playing under 11's kick and rush football again.
Join us and he becomes a better footballer - go to Stoke and he'll think he's in a time warp playing under 11's kick and rush football again. right back in the bar

3:12pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!! Mush On The Beach

3:12pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Stroppy_gramps says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.
Keep the great comments coming, we all wait with baited breath for the next pearl of wisdom to flow from your tiny tiny little mind.

How's your team doing? Administrator decided to give you another week to prolong the pain and increase his fees has he?
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.[/p][/quote]Keep the great comments coming, we all wait with baited breath for the next pearl of wisdom to flow from your tiny tiny little mind. How's your team doing? Administrator decided to give you another week to prolong the pain and increase his fees has he? Stroppy_gramps

3:26pm Fri 7 Sep 12

St Retford says...

Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
[quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect? St Retford

3:28pm Fri 7 Sep 12

CEH393 says...

Funny how Pompeys name was not mentioned in the list of clubs watching him....... I expect he wants a contract that lasts longer than a month ha,ha :-D He only has to look at our track record with youth and the fact we are the only premier league club in Hampshire, he would be daft not to sign for us COYR
Funny how Pompeys name was not mentioned in the list of clubs watching him....... I expect he wants a contract that lasts longer than a month ha,ha :-D He only has to look at our track record with youth and the fact we are the only premier league club in Hampshire, he would be daft not to sign for us COYR CEH393

3:48pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!) Mush On The Beach

4:18pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Confucious says...

angus mc coatup wrote:
Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
this sort of practise has been going on for some time confucious.
I studied marine biology at uni and a secret set of experiments took place behind closed doors while I was there.
this experiment consisted of the mixing of
sole fish eggs and skate fish sperm, resulting in a hybrid fish they called a skole.

so the next time somebody uses the
term "skate are soles" they are in fact completely anatomically correct
I know from a mate who works with some that skates do w@nk a lot.

One of the girls told the others that Ann Summers vibrators were expensive rubbish so she puts two angry wasps in a cigar tube.

One of the blokes came back at lunchtime and said bold as you please: "Lovely, I just had a w@nk in the car."

I don't approve of this sort of behaviour at all. And in fact, the skate's taxi driver was absolutely livid about it.
[quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]this sort of practise has been going on for some time confucious. I studied marine biology at uni and a secret set of experiments took place behind closed doors while I was there. this experiment consisted of the mixing of sole fish eggs and skate fish sperm, resulting in a hybrid fish they called a skole. so the next time somebody uses the term "skate are soles" they are in fact completely anatomically correct[/p][/quote]I know from a mate who works with some that skates do w@nk a lot. One of the girls told the others that Ann Summers vibrators were expensive rubbish so she puts two angry wasps in a cigar tube. One of the blokes came back at lunchtime and said bold as you please: "Lovely, I just had a w@nk in the car." I don't approve of this sort of behaviour at all. And in fact, the skate's taxi driver was absolutely livid about it. Confucious

4:25pm Fri 7 Sep 12

tugboat says...

SO50 Saint wrote:
Good point well made Flashin we should be going for top drawer players who are wanted by these teams especially as we are the number 1 team on the south coast. But I do think you have to look at building for the future. I'm sure Mr Cortese will take your advice on board as a supporter who has only just started supporting SFC your views are just as important as anyone elses
Totally agree with this,.just because
feelyurpan has only just become a saints supporter her views shouldnt be ignored.
And her mothers breakfast is not to be missed,mind you the bacon burnt in anticipation of the giro arriving.
And who has lambrusco for breakfast,ah well when in rome...........
[quote][p][bold]SO50 Saint[/bold] wrote: Good point well made Flashin we should be going for top drawer players who are wanted by these teams especially as we are the number 1 team on the south coast. But I do think you have to look at building for the future. I'm sure Mr Cortese will take your advice on board as a supporter who has only just started supporting SFC your views are just as important as anyone elses[/p][/quote]Totally agree with this,.just because feelyurpan has only just become a saints supporter her views shouldnt be ignored. And her mothers breakfast is not to be missed,mind you the bacon burnt in anticipation of the giro arriving. And who has lambrusco for breakfast,ah well when in rome........... tugboat

4:33pm Fri 7 Sep 12

angus mc coatup says...

Confucious wrote:
angus mc coatup wrote:
Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
this sort of practise has been going on for some time confucious.
I studied marine biology at uni and a secret set of experiments took place behind closed doors while I was there.
this experiment consisted of the mixing of
sole fish eggs and skate fish sperm, resulting in a hybrid fish they called a skole.

so the next time somebody uses the
term "skate are soles" they are in fact completely anatomically correct
I know from a mate who works with some that skates do w@nk a lot.

One of the girls told the others that Ann Summers vibrators were expensive rubbish so she puts two angry wasps in a cigar tube.

One of the blokes came back at lunchtime and said bold as you please: "Lovely, I just had a w@nk in the car."

I don't approve of this sort of behaviour at all. And in fact, the skate's taxi driver was absolutely livid about it.
now the've gone from skates, to skunts,
and now skankers.
or even skwankers.
either way the're all tossers.
[quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]angus mc coatup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]this sort of practise has been going on for some time confucious. I studied marine biology at uni and a secret set of experiments took place behind closed doors while I was there. this experiment consisted of the mixing of sole fish eggs and skate fish sperm, resulting in a hybrid fish they called a skole. so the next time somebody uses the term "skate are soles" they are in fact completely anatomically correct[/p][/quote]I know from a mate who works with some that skates do w@nk a lot. One of the girls told the others that Ann Summers vibrators were expensive rubbish so she puts two angry wasps in a cigar tube. One of the blokes came back at lunchtime and said bold as you please: "Lovely, I just had a w@nk in the car." I don't approve of this sort of behaviour at all. And in fact, the skate's taxi driver was absolutely livid about it.[/p][/quote]now the've gone from skates, to skunts, and now skankers. or even skwankers. either way the're all tossers. angus mc coatup

4:33pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Alicesdad wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
Thank god it is not a Lowe count.
Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream.

It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning.

It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen.

Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred.

Confucious you have started something here.
Works for racehorses, apart from any I have backed.
[quote][p][bold]Alicesdad[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]Thank god it is not a Lowe count.[/p][/quote]Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream. It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning. It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen. Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred. Confucious you have started something here.[/p][/quote]Works for racehorses, apart from any I have backed. warrens 76

4:34pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

billythesaint wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
"Im out of eastenders" no spandau "both".
Can you play centre back?
No only Gold and lifeline!
[quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]"Im out of eastenders" no spandau "both".[/p][/quote]Can you play centre back?[/p][/quote]No only Gold and lifeline! warrens 76

4:36pm Fri 7 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
i dont know where you have got this infomation from, but i think your wrong.

i have it from a very very reliable source (the poopey news forums), that we are SCUMMERS and SCUM! this infomation must be true because they put the word fact after it however they print this word in caps, i.e. FACT! how can that be wrong? ;)
also these FACTS are posted by the bestest best ever best fans in the bestest world bestest ever best tm.
may i just point out that i never saw any evidence to back the claim however they put FACT in caps and that should be enough!

poopey involved in their 3rd `big` south coast derby of the season on sunday! its a david Vs goliath match again and you never know david may win again but i want goliath to win, so come on CRAWLEY. with this huge game on i will be glued to the tv, F1 at monza!
[quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]i dont know where you have got this infomation from, but i think your wrong. i have it from a very very reliable source (the poopey news forums), that we are SCUMMERS and SCUM! this infomation must be true because they put the word fact after it however they print this word in caps, i.e. FACT! how can that be wrong? ;) also these FACTS are posted by the bestest best ever best fans in the bestest world bestest ever best tm. may i just point out that i never saw any evidence to back the claim however they put FACT in caps and that should be enough! poopey involved in their 3rd `big` south coast derby of the season on sunday! its a david Vs goliath match again and you never know david may win again but i want goliath to win, so come on CRAWLEY. with this huge game on i will be glued to the tv, F1 at monza! saintshorse101

4:36pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
Biff, Boff, Kerzam!
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]Biff, Boff, Kerzam! warrens 76

4:36pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
Biff, Boff, Kerzam!
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]Biff, Boff, Kerzam! warrens 76

4:39pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

CEH393 wrote:
Funny how Pompeys name was not mentioned in the list of clubs watching him....... I expect he wants a contract that lasts longer than a month ha,ha :-D He only has to look at our track record with youth and the fact we are the only premier league club in Hampshire, he would be daft not to sign for us COYR
Outrageous! how dare you suggest portsmuff could give a month long contract.
[quote][p][bold]CEH393[/bold] wrote: Funny how Pompeys name was not mentioned in the list of clubs watching him....... I expect he wants a contract that lasts longer than a month ha,ha :-D He only has to look at our track record with youth and the fact we are the only premier league club in Hampshire, he would be daft not to sign for us COYR[/p][/quote]Outrageous! how dare you suggest portsmuff could give a month long contract. warrens 76

4:43pm Fri 7 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?
i know just playing with his name
I know that, I was just annoyed that you got in first!
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?[/p][/quote]i know just playing with his name[/p][/quote]I know that, I was just annoyed that you got in first! OSPREYSAINT

4:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12

St Retford says...

International breaks are a bit boring, aren't they?
International breaks are a bit boring, aren't they? St Retford

4:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

Ahhh another slow news day. why are no skunts when we need to mock the afflicted ?
Ahhh another slow news day. why are no skunts when we need to mock the afflicted ? willygetaway

4:49pm Fri 7 Sep 12

mack chinnon says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.
Come on Crawley.
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.[/p][/quote]Come on Crawley. mack chinnon

5:04pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

mack chinnon wrote:
Flashin the pan wrote:
There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.
Come on Crawley.
Mack tow the skunt out and sink him on your boat via the plank, he is a lilly livered gob-shiite who would wet his pants in a proper confrontation with a Mush Crew
[quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.[/p][/quote]Come on Crawley.[/p][/quote]Mack tow the skunt out and sink him on your boat via the plank, he is a lilly livered gob-shiite who would wet his pants in a proper confrontation with a Mush Crew Mush On The Beach

5:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
Ahhh another slow news day. why are no skunts when we need to mock the afflicted ?
Brother were have you been and why are you wearing civilian clothes.
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: Ahhh another slow news day. why are no skunts when we need to mock the afflicted ?[/p][/quote]Brother were have you been and why are you wearing civilian clothes. warrens 76

5:14pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy. warrens 76

5:25pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
Ahhh another slow news day. why are no skunts when we need to mock the afflicted ?
Brother were have you been and why are you wearing civilian clothes.
Ahhhh brudder i am in Liverpool refitting my ship and the emperors new clothes are but a rouse
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: Ahhh another slow news day. why are no skunts when we need to mock the afflicted ?[/p][/quote]Brother were have you been and why are you wearing civilian clothes.[/p][/quote]Ahhhh brudder i am in Liverpool refitting my ship and the emperors new clothes are but a rouse willygetaway

5:32pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother willygetaway

5:32pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Linesman says...

Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
[quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth. Linesman

5:37pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
Thats not a port its a sewage outlet, and well they know it
[quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]Thats not a port its a sewage outlet, and well they know it willygetaway

5:40pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
Not during the time frame in question. But you have certainly confirmed everything BLUE about you that I suspected. At least I will know how to measure you from now on
[quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]Not during the time frame in question. But you have certainly confirmed everything BLUE about you that I suspected. At least I will know how to measure you from now on Mush On The Beach

5:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

st1halo says...

CB FRY LIVES wrote:
billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.
I remember, have his autograph and his bubblegum card pic on my pc, as well as the likes of dennis hollywood, tom jenkins etc etc ... blasts from the past!!

STID
[quote][p][bold]CB FRY LIVES[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.[/p][/quote]I remember, have his autograph and his bubblegum card pic on my pc, as well as the likes of dennis hollywood, tom jenkins etc etc ... blasts from the past!! STID st1halo

5:54pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

st1halo wrote:
CB FRY LIVES wrote:
billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.
I remember, have his autograph and his bubblegum card pic on my pc, as well as the likes of dennis hollywood, tom jenkins etc etc ... blasts from the past!!

STID
i only remember Ted Bates as manager so big RESPECT to the old fellas they let me watch (as younger guys) from the front at the milton road end
[quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CB FRY LIVES[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.[/p][/quote]I remember, have his autograph and his bubblegum card pic on my pc, as well as the likes of dennis hollywood, tom jenkins etc etc ... blasts from the past!! STID[/p][/quote]i only remember Ted Bates as manager so big RESPECT to the old fellas they let me watch (as younger guys) from the front at the milton road end willygetaway

6:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

slugger says...

Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .
[quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo . slugger

6:13pm Fri 7 Sep 12

slugger says...

slugger wrote:
Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .
oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .[/p][/quote]oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry . slugger

6:15pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Baddesley Bill says...

slugger wrote:
slugger wrote:
Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .
oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .
Wot no fish market? :O)
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .[/p][/quote]oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .[/p][/quote]Wot no fish market? :O) Baddesley Bill

6:17pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well". warrens 76

6:20pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Velleity says...

Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back:

http://www.bbc.co.uk
/sport/0/football/19
522709

Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here? Velleity

6:53pm Fri 7 Sep 12

pjwilk says...

I am a Brighton fan,i think you have played terrific football so far and was hoping for a saints win over Utd,without the ex Gunner they would have lost.You need some points on the board,im sure you dont want us passing you at the end of the season,be nice if we are both in the Premiership next season.
I am a Brighton fan,i think you have played terrific football so far and was hoping for a saints win over Utd,without the ex Gunner they would have lost.You need some points on the board,im sure you dont want us passing you at the end of the season,be nice if we are both in the Premiership next season. pjwilk

6:55pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

pjwilk wrote:
I am a Brighton fan,i think you have played terrific football so far and was hoping for a saints win over Utd,without the ex Gunner they would have lost.You need some points on the board,im sure you dont want us passing you at the end of the season,be nice if we are both in the Premiership next season.
Thankyou from all of us!
[quote][p][bold]pjwilk[/bold] wrote: I am a Brighton fan,i think you have played terrific football so far and was hoping for a saints win over Utd,without the ex Gunner they would have lost.You need some points on the board,im sure you dont want us passing you at the end of the season,be nice if we are both in the Premiership next season.[/p][/quote]Thankyou from all of us! warrens 76

6:56pm Fri 7 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

Velleity wrote:
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch!
anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?[/p][/quote]how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch! anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met? saintshorse101

6:56pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ? willygetaway

7:15pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?
No Mr S Milligan!
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?[/p][/quote]No Mr S Milligan! warrens 76

7:21pm Fri 7 Sep 12

dadofmy3sons says...

also known as Spike Maligna, the famous typing error
also known as Spike Maligna, the famous typing error dadofmy3sons

7:24pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?
No Mr S Milligan!
Thank you sir, please may i have another ?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?[/p][/quote]No Mr S Milligan![/p][/quote]Thank you sir, please may i have another ? willygetaway

7:53pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?
No Mr S Milligan!
Thank you sir, please may i have another ?
Goodbye Mr Chips..."there wrong you know, they said I never had boy's, i've had hundreds".
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?[/p][/quote]No Mr S Milligan![/p][/quote]Thank you sir, please may i have another ?[/p][/quote]Goodbye Mr Chips..."there wrong you know, they said I never had boy's, i've had hundreds". warrens 76

8:00pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?
No Mr S Milligan!
Thank you sir, please may i have another ?
Goodbye Mr Chips..."there wrong you know, they said I never had boy's, i've had hundreds".
Ahhh the words of that skuntville resident Mr G Glitter
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?[/p][/quote]No Mr S Milligan![/p][/quote]Thank you sir, please may i have another ?[/p][/quote]Goodbye Mr Chips..."there wrong you know, they said I never had boy's, i've had hundreds".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of that skuntville resident Mr G Glitter willygetaway

8:02pm Fri 7 Sep 12

WobblyCat says...

St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
This is no time for levity, my mate Gavin has just died from heartburn. I can't believe it, Gaviscon.

Slow today init?
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]This is no time for levity, my mate Gavin has just died from heartburn. I can't believe it, Gaviscon. Slow today init? WobblyCat

8:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

CEH393 says...

warrens 76 wrote:
CEH393 wrote:
Funny how Pompeys name was not mentioned in the list of clubs watching him....... I expect he wants a contract that lasts longer than a month ha,ha :-D He only has to look at our track record with youth and the fact we are the only premier league club in Hampshire, he would be daft not to sign for us COYR
Outrageous! how dare you suggest portsmuff could give a month long contract.
You know that their entire squad on 1 month contracts.... Well the contract is the only piece of paper the players have seen so far..... Well tell a lie they got an IOU in the post last week lol
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CEH393[/bold] wrote: Funny how Pompeys name was not mentioned in the list of clubs watching him....... I expect he wants a contract that lasts longer than a month ha,ha :-D He only has to look at our track record with youth and the fact we are the only premier league club in Hampshire, he would be daft not to sign for us COYR[/p][/quote]Outrageous! how dare you suggest portsmuff could give a month long contract.[/p][/quote]You know that their entire squad on 1 month contracts.... Well the contract is the only piece of paper the players have seen so far..... Well tell a lie they got an IOU in the post last week lol CEH393

8:17pm Fri 7 Sep 12

oregonsaint says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick!
i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
Who is Harry Cornick by the way?
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]Who is Harry Cornick by the way? oregonsaint

8:29pm Fri 7 Sep 12

slugger says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
slugger wrote:
slugger wrote:
Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .
oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .
Wot no fish market? :O)
of course not , who would by any fish after what they've done them ? ....... dirty fish fiddlers !
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .[/p][/quote]oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .[/p][/quote]Wot no fish market? :O)[/p][/quote]of course not , who would by any fish after what they've done them ? ....... dirty fish fiddlers ! slugger

8:34pm Fri 7 Sep 12

pompey in spain says...

it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.
it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners. pompey in spain

8:42pm Fri 7 Sep 12

slugger says...

slugger wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
slugger wrote:
slugger wrote:
Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .
oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .
Wot no fish market? :O)
of course not , who would by any fish after what they've done them ? ....... dirty fish fiddlers !
*buy .... doh !
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .[/p][/quote]oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .[/p][/quote]Wot no fish market? :O)[/p][/quote]of course not , who would by any fish after what they've done them ? ....... dirty fish fiddlers ![/p][/quote]*buy .... doh ! slugger

8:42pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

pompey in spain wrote:
it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.
Now play the game, either you have spent may years away from skuntsville and have thus become enlightened and educated.
or mother has spiked my drink again with rahipnol
[quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.[/p][/quote]Now play the game, either you have spent may years away from skuntsville and have thus become enlightened and educated. or mother has spiked my drink again with rahipnol willygetaway

8:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

slugger wrote:
slugger wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
slugger wrote:
slugger wrote:
Linesman wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question.
We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike.
The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it.

As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS.
Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly.

DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)
There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.
not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .
oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .
Wot no fish market? :O)
of course not , who would by any fish after what they've done them ? ....... dirty fish fiddlers !
*buy .... doh !
is he a good CB Slugger ?
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Linesman[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]I’m well aware of those numpties take on it, but that wasn’t my question. We all know there was no picketing of a naval dock in Pompey as the naval forces don’t strike. The real story was actually that they brought scab labour from Poopey to to replace Mush Dockers in dispute like the rest of the dockers around the country. Ask Granny Mush or Auntie Elspeth or any of the proud old Southampton people who would laugh in the face of what the modern Poopey Scummers are trying to spin on it. As I said POOPEY SCUMMERS are POOPEY SCUMMERS. Don’t ever soften the tone and call them Skates, that’s letting them off far too lightly. DELUDED SKUNTS is acceptable (Read above!!!!)[/p][/quote]There is also a commercial port in Portsmouth.[/p][/quote]not exactly huge though , the iow ferry and a couple of ferries to france ! woopie doo .[/p][/quote]oh , and a hovercraft and the gospit ferry .[/p][/quote]Wot no fish market? :O)[/p][/quote]of course not , who would by any fish after what they've done them ? ....... dirty fish fiddlers ![/p][/quote]*buy .... doh ![/p][/quote]is he a good CB Slugger ? willygetaway

8:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

WobblyCat wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
This is no time for levity, my mate Gavin has just died from heartburn. I can't believe it, Gaviscon.

Slow today init?
unbelievably slow!
[quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]This is no time for levity, my mate Gavin has just died from heartburn. I can't believe it, Gaviscon. Slow today init?[/p][/quote]unbelievably slow! warrens 76

8:44pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

WobblyCat wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
This is no time for levity, my mate Gavin has just died from heartburn. I can't believe it, Gaviscon.

Slow today init?
unbelievably slow!
[quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]This is no time for levity, my mate Gavin has just died from heartburn. I can't believe it, Gaviscon. Slow today init?[/p][/quote]unbelievably slow! warrens 76

8:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

pompey in spain wrote:
it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.
"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.
[quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.[/p][/quote]"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice. warrens 76

8:48pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

warrens 76 wrote:
pompey in spain wrote:
it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.
"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.
Night night Bro..phone tommorrow.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.[/p][/quote]"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.[/p][/quote]Night night Bro..phone tommorrow. warrens 76

8:50pm Fri 7 Sep 12

slugger says...

warrens 76 wrote:
pompey in spain wrote:
it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.
"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.
i'm off to the potting shed to inhale a bit more of that fertilizer ........ ahhhhhh , that's better !
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.[/p][/quote]"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.[/p][/quote]i'm off to the potting shed to inhale a bit more of that fertilizer ........ ahhhhhh , that's better ! slugger

8:53pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
pompey in spain wrote:
it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.
"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.
Night night Bro..phone tommorrow.
look forward to it bro night x
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: it gotta be said....leaving the difference of opinion between you lot and our lot the majority of mature abuse that you lot come out with is of a standard of the highest quality...i tip my hat to you all and cannot find it in me tonight to say anything nasty or uncouth,and i even think you will draw with the gooners.[/p][/quote]"I do not believe it" in a Victor Meldrew voice.[/p][/quote]Night night Bro..phone tommorrow.[/p][/quote]look forward to it bro night x willygetaway

8:58pm Fri 7 Sep 12

windyboy says...

Velleity wrote:
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back:

http://www.bbc.co.uk

/sport/0/football/19

522709

Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
Quick hide the chequebook!
[quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?[/p][/quote]Quick hide the chequebook! windyboy

9:02pm Fri 7 Sep 12

pompey in spain says...

getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o
getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o pompey in spain

9:15pm Fri 7 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

pompey in spain wrote:
getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o
What in Portsmuff is remotely better than Southampton, the view, the housing, the violence, the attacks on students, the crime, the dirt, the 30 year out of date attitude, come on the big big problem is Southampton is a nice place surrounded by nice places, Portsea a'int and just like tatty council tenants do not like the posh B***rds over the road you do not like us....

The above is factual, now i will throw you a bone, your base support is more vocal and passionate than ours, I do not deny it, to many of ours turn up to be entertained and not involved...
[quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o[/p][/quote]What in Portsmuff is remotely better than Southampton, the view, the housing, the violence, the attacks on students, the crime, the dirt, the 30 year out of date attitude, come on the big big problem is Southampton is a nice place surrounded by nice places, Portsea a'int and just like tatty council tenants do not like the posh B***rds over the road you do not like us.... The above is factual, now i will throw you a bone, your base support is more vocal and passionate than ours, I do not deny it, to many of ours turn up to be entertained and not involved... warrens 76

9:15pm Fri 7 Sep 12

randre says...

Mush On The Beach wrote:
Flashin the pan wrote:
There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.
What do you mean by says it all really, can we closely analyse that further as you are our guest?

a) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.


b) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.

c) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.

Better luck in your next reincarnation SKUNT, you may move up the chain and become a cockroach, but hopefully more interesting next time
Mush, I love it.... So true.
[quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: There's lots of interest in this lad but not from the top teams like Man c or Man utd or Chelsea or Liverpool...just saints and Stoke c the lesser teams playing in the Premiership...says it all really.[/p][/quote]What do you mean by says it all really, can we closely analyse that further as you are our guest? a) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil.   b) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil. c) Perhaps you are a skint skunt scummer deep in a drowning mode of envy to your red and white superior neighbours and don’t realise what a continual twaat you make of yourself on here before your impending date with the devil. Better luck in your next reincarnation SKUNT, you may move up the chain and become a cockroach, but hopefully more interesting next time[/p][/quote]Mush, I love it.... So true. randre

9:24pm Fri 7 Sep 12

J.P.M says...

Well, he does have a sad face..............
SFC SFC SFC
SFC SFC SFCeeeeeeEEEE
SFC SFC SFC
SFC SFC SFCeeeeeeEEEE
Well, he does have a sad face.............. SFC SFC SFC SFC SFC SFCeeeeeeEEEE SFC SFC SFC SFC SFC SFCeeeeeeEEEE J.P.M

9:28pm Fri 7 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
pompey in spain wrote:
getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!!


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o
What in Portsmuff is remotely better than Southampton, the view, the housing, the violence, the attacks on students, the crime, the dirt, the 30 year out of date attitude, come on the big big problem is Southampton is a nice place surrounded by nice places, Portsea a'int and just like tatty council tenants do not like the posh B***rds over the road you do not like us....

The above is factual, now i will throw you a bone, your base support is more vocal and passionate than ours, I do not deny it, to many of ours turn up to be entertained and not involved...
you tell him BRO
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o[/p][/quote]What in Portsmuff is remotely better than Southampton, the view, the housing, the violence, the attacks on students, the crime, the dirt, the 30 year out of date attitude, come on the big big problem is Southampton is a nice place surrounded by nice places, Portsea a'int and just like tatty council tenants do not like the posh B***rds over the road you do not like us.... The above is factual, now i will throw you a bone, your base support is more vocal and passionate than ours, I do not deny it, to many of ours turn up to be entertained and not involved...[/p][/quote]you tell him BRO willygetaway

10:03pm Fri 7 Sep 12

RedArmy1 says...

Who are the blue few ???

WE ARE SOUTHAMPTON.

We are more passionate and vocal.

RED ARMY. WE RULE THE SOUTH
Who are the blue few ??? WE ARE SOUTHAMPTON. We are more passionate and vocal. RED ARMY. WE RULE THE SOUTH RedArmy1

10:06pm Fri 7 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

pjwilk wrote:
I am a Brighton fan,i think you have played terrific football so far and was hoping for a saints win over Utd,without the ex Gunner they would have lost.You need some points on the board,im sure you dont want us passing you at the end of the season,be nice if we are both in the Premiership next season.
Just make sure Deano gets decent support, you will benefit big time.
[quote][p][bold]pjwilk[/bold] wrote: I am a Brighton fan,i think you have played terrific football so far and was hoping for a saints win over Utd,without the ex Gunner they would have lost.You need some points on the board,im sure you dont want us passing you at the end of the season,be nice if we are both in the Premiership next season.[/p][/quote]Just make sure Deano gets decent support, you will benefit big time. OSPREYSAINT

10:16pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Tirau Dan says...

Would be great to have Harry Connick jr for a show at SMS.

17 is a bit late for getting discovered by Saints.. but always pleased to know we are scouting about..
Would be great to have Harry Connick jr for a show at SMS. 17 is a bit late for getting discovered by Saints.. but always pleased to know we are scouting about.. Tirau Dan

11:07pm Fri 7 Sep 12

andysaints007 says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Why are they chasing him? is a shoplifter or a burgler running away..?

If not why not pick up the phone or drop by his house and have a chat...I do not see that chasing the poor lad will make him sign, probably frighten the life out of him.

Come on if someone started chasing you up the street would you think they wanted you to a) play for another football team or b) it was a potential mugging.
or c) you are a pratt
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: Why are they chasing him? is a shoplifter or a burgler running away..? If not why not pick up the phone or drop by his house and have a chat...I do not see that chasing the poor lad will make him sign, probably frighten the life out of him. Come on if someone started chasing you up the street would you think they wanted you to a) play for another football team or b) it was a potential mugging.[/p][/quote]or c) you are a pratt andysaints007

11:09pm Fri 7 Sep 12

andysaints007 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick!
i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?
Wow - when did you have your sense of humour bypass? Donut
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?[/p][/quote]Wow - when did you have your sense of humour bypass? Donut andysaints007

12:32am Sat 8 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

pompey in spain wrote:
getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o
AAARRRRHHHHH are you upset, do you want a cry? how about a hug from someone? poor little fishy.

we could go on about `loyalty` all night if you want. how about we start with how loyal our fans were when we were in div1, and yours were in the prem, our attendances still higher than yours! is that more loyal or not then? or when we were both in the champ no still higher than yours and now your fans are so loyal they cant be bothered to go to a local derby cup game, less than 6000! still its not as if you needed the money from the gate is it!
your pathetic `we are better than you` posts really are a bit stupid and schoolboyish arent they. your great city and its wonderful inhabitants are a breed apart from the rest of the country granted but its a lower form of life! people who dont know the difference between a peodaphile and a pediatrician!
swim on little fishy!
[quote][p][bold]pompey in spain[/bold] wrote: getaway.....now i was trying to be repectful and you go and get nasty..if you want to read idiots comments see your lots postings on our papers forums today.but yes ive been away from pompey for many years in answer to you query BUT ...AND THIS IS WHAT YOU LOT DONT SEEM TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! i go back on a regular basis to watch my team....IT CALLED LOYALITY PREM LEAGUE,DIV1 ,2, AMERETTO SUNDAY TEA TIME WHATEVER...WE ARE WE WERE AND WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER THAN YOU,,,THICK OR THIN WE FOLLOW THE BLUE SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE THE BEST SIDE OF HAMPSHIRE..P.U.P.!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! see youve gone and wound me up now and i was trying to be so nice. hope arsenal thrash you 6-o[/p][/quote]AAARRRRHHHHH are you upset, do you want a cry? how about a hug from someone? poor little fishy. we could go on about `loyalty` all night if you want. how about we start with how loyal our fans were when we were in div1, and yours were in the prem, our attendances still higher than yours! is that more loyal or not then? or when we were both in the champ no still higher than yours and now your fans are so loyal they cant be bothered to go to a local derby cup game, less than 6000! still its not as if you needed the money from the gate is it! your pathetic `we are better than you` posts really are a bit stupid and schoolboyish arent they. your great city and its wonderful inhabitants are a breed apart from the rest of the country granted but its a lower form of life! people who dont know the difference between a peodaphile and a pediatrician! swim on little fishy! saintshorse101

5:34am Sat 8 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

Alicesdad wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Confucious wrote:
I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday.

I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy.

Fantastic long term strategic planning.

As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.
Thank god it is not a Lowe count.
Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream.

It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning.

It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen.

Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred.

Confucious you have started something here.
Lol, I have first dibs on Matt LeTiss's frozen tads. Bought the rights to em for £100 quid in a charity auction. Reckon I'll make a fortune one day. If they haven't perfected the technology in my lifetime or relaxed the regulations on that sort of thing it doesn't matter cos I've willed em to my son.
[quote][p][bold]Alicesdad[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Confucious[/bold] wrote: I've been told the club have put Hants and Dorset midwives on commission retainers to tip them off when likely-looking criiteria-meeting babies are born. We signed Alan, a 3 day old at Bournemouth General on Wednesday. I understand we have also bought frozen sperm from 14 leading international players and it is now in test tubes with eggs bought from leading female Olympic gold medal winners. All participants have pre-signed the embryos to our academy. Fantastic long term strategic planning. As a fully committed Saint I have sent Nicola a tissue with a sample of my own for evaluation and have told him there will be no charge and no offence taken if it is deemed not quite up to scratch.[/p][/quote]Thank god it is not a Lowe count.[/p][/quote]Todays dry humour is tomorrows wet dream. It's scary but in a few years they will probably actually do this for real. (If they are not already ??) You can easily imagine all top clubs taking the necessary samples from the best players and storing them with the long term intention of cloning. It is just a stretch of the imagination today but if there are millions of pounds to be made then this will happen. Players will all be looking to add the necessary tadpole clause in their contracts so they can take the samples with them when they get transferred. Confucious you have started something here.[/p][/quote]Lol, I have first dibs on Matt LeTiss's frozen tads. Bought the rights to em for £100 quid in a charity auction. Reckon I'll make a fortune one day. If they haven't perfected the technology in my lifetime or relaxed the regulations on that sort of thing it doesn't matter cos I've willed em to my son. Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

5:39am Sat 8 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

St Retford wrote:
Mind you, she hates it when I swap her chocolate bar wrappers about for a laugh.

It really gets her Snickers in a Twix.
Did you know that sex is like bridge? If you aren't very good at it you need a good hand.
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Mind you, she hates it when I swap her chocolate bar wrappers about for a laugh. It really gets her Snickers in a Twix.[/p][/quote]Did you know that sex is like bridge? If you aren't very good at it you need a good hand. Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

5:50am Sat 8 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch!
anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?
Hmm, a business man who knows nothing about football and a football man who knows nothing about business with a Russian money man in the background. Sounds like a familiar recipe for disaster to me. Bet HMRC are keeping a close watch.
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?[/p][/quote]how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch! anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?[/p][/quote]Hmm, a business man who knows nothing about football and a football man who knows nothing about business with a Russian money man in the background. Sounds like a familiar recipe for disaster to me. Bet HMRC are keeping a close watch. Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

5:57am Sat 8 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

Tirau Dan wrote:
Would be great to have Harry Connick jr for a show at SMS.

17 is a bit late for getting discovered by Saints.. but always pleased to know we are scouting about..
He is a cracking player. My son used to play in the same team as him at school in Poole.
[quote][p][bold]Tirau Dan[/bold] wrote: Would be great to have Harry Connick jr for a show at SMS. 17 is a bit late for getting discovered by Saints.. but always pleased to know we are scouting about..[/p][/quote]He is a cracking player. My son used to play in the same team as him at school in Poole. Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

8:15am Sat 8 Sep 12

SFCOLDBOY says...

CB FRY LIVES wrote:
billythesaint wrote:
Who is Kemp?!
Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.
You are right.
I remember Fred Kemp,he played as a half back.
(mid-fielder-to you youngsters)
He was a very good signing for Saints at the time.
Scorred a few good goals too.
The interesting thing I remember about him, is that he ran with an uneven gait.
It was suggested at the time that he had one leg a bit longer than the other.
COYR
[quote][p][bold]CB FRY LIVES[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]billythesaint[/bold] wrote: Who is Kemp?![/p][/quote]Good question that is what i asked myself.Talking of KEMP does any one rember a TED BATES signing back in the 60's FRED KEMP.A wing-half/inside forward who came to the DELL from Wolves.[/p][/quote]You are right. I remember Fred Kemp,he played as a half back. (mid-fielder-to you youngsters) He was a very good signing for Saints at the time. Scorred a few good goals too. The interesting thing I remember about him, is that he ran with an uneven gait. It was suggested at the time that he had one leg a bit longer than the other. COYR SFCOLDBOY

8:15am Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

andysaints007 wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Why are they chasing him? is a shoplifter or a burgler running away..?

If not why not pick up the phone or drop by his house and have a chat...I do not see that chasing the poor lad will make him sign, probably frighten the life out of him.

Come on if someone started chasing you up the street would you think they wanted you to a) play for another football team or b) it was a potential mugging.
or c) you are a pratt
Any you for no reason are a rude individual who "really" does not want to get on the wrong side of me.
[quote][p][bold]andysaints007[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: Why are they chasing him? is a shoplifter or a burgler running away..? If not why not pick up the phone or drop by his house and have a chat...I do not see that chasing the poor lad will make him sign, probably frighten the life out of him. Come on if someone started chasing you up the street would you think they wanted you to a) play for another football team or b) it was a potential mugging.[/p][/quote]or c) you are a pratt[/p][/quote]Any you for no reason are a rude individual who "really" does not want to get on the wrong side of me. warrens 76

8:45am Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch!
anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?
Yes they do....by the way the measure of the man is how he treats his not famous son Mark...ever see him in happy families WII ads nope...wanna know why?
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?[/p][/quote]how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch! anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?[/p][/quote]Yes they do....by the way the measure of the man is how he treats his not famous son Mark...ever see him in happy families WII ads nope...wanna know why? warrens 76

8:55am Sat 8 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

warrens 76 wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch!
anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?
Yes they do....by the way the measure of the man is how he treats his not famous son Mark...ever see him in happy families WII ads nope...wanna know why?
Yes I do Brother, the world needs to be enlightened on are no reading or writing friend, the Redknapp clan
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?[/p][/quote]how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch! anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?[/p][/quote]Yes they do....by the way the measure of the man is how he treats his not famous son Mark...ever see him in happy families WII ads nope...wanna know why?[/p][/quote]Yes I do Brother, the world needs to be enlightened on are no reading or writing friend, the Redknapp clan willygetaway

9:34am Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
Velleity wrote:
Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?
how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch!
anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?
Yes they do....by the way the measure of the man is how he treats his not famous son Mark...ever see him in happy families WII ads nope...wanna know why?
Yes I do Brother, the world needs to be enlightened on are no reading or writing friend, the Redknapp clan
"Allegedly"...in the unlikely event it is wrong Mark was a great footballer centre half I believe, all the talent in the world, suffered a ligament injury back in the day when it meant career over, Harry had practically nothing to do with him from then on and only intersted in Jamie..

In fairness Jamie is a good guy so it is not his fault, but it must be a little disconcerting starring in a happy families ad with your wife, father, mother and extras but your brother with his nipper a'int allowed near it...
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Velleity[/bold] wrote: Poor old Bournemouth - saggy chops is back: http://www.bbc.co.uk /sport/0/football/19 522709 Wonder if that'll stop the rumours about his coming here?[/p][/quote]how long, how long before he tries to take over and ruin another club? he would have distroyed our club (again). he is a football dinosaur! we have a great team made up of quality players andsome really useful youngsters! he would have got rid of most of them and brought in over rated foreign players and journeyman prem players! rickie would have been replaced by peter crouch! anyway eddie mitchell and harry redkrap deserve each other! but i cant see that relationship lasting. perhaps eddie had a few too many when they met?[/p][/quote]Yes they do....by the way the measure of the man is how he treats his not famous son Mark...ever see him in happy families WII ads nope...wanna know why?[/p][/quote]Yes I do Brother, the world needs to be enlightened on are no reading or writing friend, the Redknapp clan[/p][/quote]"Allegedly"...in the unlikely event it is wrong Mark was a great footballer centre half I believe, all the talent in the world, suffered a ligament injury back in the day when it meant career over, Harry had practically nothing to do with him from then on and only intersted in Jamie.. In fairness Jamie is a good guy so it is not his fault, but it must be a little disconcerting starring in a happy families ad with your wife, father, mother and extras but your brother with his nipper a'int allowed near it... warrens 76

9:56am Sat 8 Sep 12

Pogle says...

warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
St Retford wrote:
Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat.

Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.
I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea.
So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright:

When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze?
When did Bombay become Mumbai?
When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing.
POOPEY SCUMMERS!!!
I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us.

They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?
Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.
Words of wisdom Brother
There you are!
"they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!"
"what i mean is were have you been"
"i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there".
"Your late"
"I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".
Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?
No Mr S Milligan!
Thank you sir, please may i have another ?
Goodbye Mr Chips..."there wrong you know, they said I never had boy's, i've had hundreds".
Send me another boy!
This ones burst!
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: Has anyone been to see the new Batman film? I took my new girlfriend along last night. It was our ninth date and the first time we've not gone out for a bite to eat. Our dates so far can be summarised as: dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman.[/p][/quote]I believe I’ve previously used that old chestnut against that pitiful juvenile serial skunt pest Laffaminute who spent the majority of his time bashing the bishop ala Confucious style while mummy was calling him for tea. So if you will assist to make up for your obvious contravening of Mush copywright: When did Squeeze become UK Squeeze? When did Bombay become Mumbai? When did Poopey Scummers stop being thought of as Poopey Scummers in some quarters into Skates? Frankly unacceptable to me, my father, my granny and her granny and her grannys granny only know one thing. POOPEY SCUMMERS!!![/p][/quote]I believe that latter point was all down to someone in Portsmouth with no honour whatsoever coming up with the theory that there was once a union called the Southampton Company of Union Men (can you see what they've done there?) who voted to scab on the dockers of Portsmouth during a strike. This, they say, gives a historical legitimacy for calling us "scummers" and also justifies all their vitriol against us. They don't seem to be deterred in the least by the fact that there is no historical evidence whatsoever that a Southampton Company of Union Men ever existed, nor the fact Southampton workers have not once scabbed on them. It's actually quite a shameful lie, but what else would you expect?[/p][/quote]Never ever lose sight of the "fact" that portsmuffs dislike of our city is in direct proportion to the sheer horribleness of their own, i believe it is called envy.[/p][/quote]Words of wisdom Brother[/p][/quote]There you are! "they would'nt let me on the train naked sir!" "what i mean is were have you been" "i had to get of at Bexhill sir, it was'nt easy the train did'nt stop there". "Your late" "I'll make up for it sir, i'll fight nights as well".[/p][/quote]Ahhh the words of Mr Millaigan i believe ?[/p][/quote]No Mr S Milligan![/p][/quote]Thank you sir, please may i have another ?[/p][/quote]Goodbye Mr Chips..."there wrong you know, they said I never had boy's, i've had hundreds".[/p][/quote]Send me another boy! This ones burst! Pogle

10:15am Sat 8 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

andysaints007 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick!
i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?
Wow - when did you have your sense of humour bypass? Donut
Thanks very much for the compliment, if you read through the posts more carefully you will understand what I was up to. I like donuts, especially those with a non-fattening centre.
[quote][p][bold]andysaints007[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?[/p][/quote]Wow - when did you have your sense of humour bypass? Donut[/p][/quote]Thanks very much for the compliment, if you read through the posts more carefully you will understand what I was up to. I like donuts, especially those with a non-fattening centre. OSPREYSAINT

10:19am Sat 8 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Tirau Dan wrote:
Would be great to have Harry Connick jr for a show at SMS.

17 is a bit late for getting discovered by Saints.. but always pleased to know we are scouting about..
Too square for most of the trendies on here.
[quote][p][bold]Tirau Dan[/bold] wrote: Would be great to have Harry Connick jr for a show at SMS. 17 is a bit late for getting discovered by Saints.. but always pleased to know we are scouting about..[/p][/quote]Too square for most of the trendies on here. OSPREYSAINT

10:41am Sat 8 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Enjoying Lala and Foxy on Soccer AM, both coming across as decent good humoured guys.
Enjoying Lala and Foxy on Soccer AM, both coming across as decent good humoured guys. OSPREYSAINT

10:46am Sat 8 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
Enjoying Lala and Foxy on Soccer AM, both coming across as decent good humoured guys.
and both due to be dads, lallana`s is due in 5 days, get NC down to the birth with a contract incase its a boy!
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: Enjoying Lala and Foxy on Soccer AM, both coming across as decent good humoured guys.[/p][/quote]and both due to be dads, lallana`s is due in 5 days, get NC down to the birth with a contract incase its a boy! saintshorse101

10:59am Sat 8 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Both wearing the LJS Foundation bands too, respect for Sharpy.
Both wearing the LJS Foundation bands too, respect for Sharpy. OSPREYSAINT

11:47am Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate
ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay. warrens 76

12:21pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate

ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it. Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

1:08pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate


ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
[quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on. warrens 76

2:50pm Sat 8 Sep 12

slugger says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate



ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ! slugger

3:11pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate




ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
:)
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]:) Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

3:28pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate




ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep Seedhouse the Unrepentant

3:28pm Sat 8 Sep 12

worried of n e hampshire says...

I'm so bored i'm watching scotland!
I'm so bored i'm watching scotland! worried of n e hampshire

3:52pm Sat 8 Sep 12

slugger says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate





ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ! slugger

4:05pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate






ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman Mush On The Beach

4:17pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate







ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
[quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline! Seedhouse the Unrepentant

4:41pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate






ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
They don't do shame, but the fans don't run the club..were we responsible for the horror that was Lowe' NO..

Come on the measure of a man is not to
kick someone when they are down..I know they would do it to us, but a'int that the point, who is the bigger man, I would like to think us..
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]They don't do shame, but the fans don't run the club..were we responsible for the horror that was Lowe' NO.. Come on the measure of a man is not to kick someone when they are down..I know they would do it to us, but a'int that the point, who is the bigger man, I would like to think us.. warrens 76

4:48pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate








ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself.. warrens 76

4:52pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate








ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
It’s getting embarrassing and disrespectful to other members of the football league. How can you front up with a temporary team from week to week made up of charity cases from other teams that potentially are of a better standard than their opposition? These clubs have been trying to run their business model according to the rules and are being slapped in the face.

Enough is enough. I hope their fans buy them out, but they are given the same treatment as Rangers and have to start again at the bottom of the pile.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]It’s getting embarrassing and disrespectful to other members of the football league. How can you front up with a temporary team from week to week made up of charity cases from other teams that potentially are of a better standard than their opposition? These clubs have been trying to run their business model according to the rules and are being slapped in the face. Enough is enough. I hope their fans buy them out, but they are given the same treatment as Rangers and have to start again at the bottom of the pile. Mush On The Beach

4:58pm Sat 8 Sep 12

angus mc coatup says...

my sentiments exactly mush.
they should change their name to
loan rangers!
my sentiments exactly mush. they should change their name to loan rangers! angus mc coatup

4:59pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Mush On The Beach wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate









ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
It’s getting embarrassing and disrespectful to other members of the football league. How can you front up with a temporary team from week to week made up of charity cases from other teams that potentially are of a better standard than their opposition? These clubs have been trying to run their business model according to the rules and are being slapped in the face.

Enough is enough. I hope their fans buy them out, but they are given the same treatment as Rangers and have to start again at the bottom of the pile.
Thats fair....
[quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]It’s getting embarrassing and disrespectful to other members of the football league. How can you front up with a temporary team from week to week made up of charity cases from other teams that potentially are of a better standard than their opposition? These clubs have been trying to run their business model according to the rules and are being slapped in the face. Enough is enough. I hope their fans buy them out, but they are given the same treatment as Rangers and have to start again at the bottom of the pile.[/p][/quote]Thats fair.... warrens 76

5:02pm Sat 8 Sep 12

slugger says...

warrens 76 wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate







ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
They don't do shame, but the fans don't run the club..were we responsible for the horror that was Lowe' NO..

Come on the measure of a man is not to
kick someone when they are down..I know they would do it to us, but a'int that the point, who is the bigger man, I would like to think us..
this time last year i thought like you ............ enough is enough ...... just because the bestest fans in the world ever (tm) aren't to blame is irrelevent ...... let nature take it's course and football will be more trustworthy as a result . (imo) .
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]They don't do shame, but the fans don't run the club..were we responsible for the horror that was Lowe' NO.. Come on the measure of a man is not to kick someone when they are down..I know they would do it to us, but a'int that the point, who is the bigger man, I would like to think us..[/p][/quote]this time last year i thought like you ............ enough is enough ...... just because the bestest fans in the world ever (tm) aren't to blame is irrelevent ...... let nature take it's course and football will be more trustworthy as a result . (imo) . slugger

5:07pm Sat 8 Sep 12

slugger says...

skunts !
skunts ! slugger

5:11pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Mush On The Beach says...

slugger wrote:
skunts !
AKA Scummers!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: skunts ![/p][/quote]AKA Scummers! Mush On The Beach

6:00pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Fatty x Ford Worker says...

Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre!
Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre! Fatty x Ford Worker

6:07pm Sat 8 Sep 12

slugger says...

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre!
talking to me weirdo ?
[quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre![/p][/quote]talking to me weirdo ? slugger

6:13pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Fatty x Ford Worker says...

slugger wrote:
Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre!
talking to me weirdo ?
5-0 Gooners then mate have fun!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre![/p][/quote]talking to me weirdo ?[/p][/quote]5-0 Gooners then mate have fun! Fatty x Ford Worker

6:24pm Sat 8 Sep 12

slugger says...

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
slugger wrote:
Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre!
talking to me weirdo ?
5-0 Gooners then mate have fun!
the best thing about being a saint for the last 3 seasons is that it's been fun and the majority of us have loed the ride.........you on the other hand are just bizzarly negative ......... get yer glad rags on and continue to tease those sailors , you know it's what you do best !
[quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre![/p][/quote]talking to me weirdo ?[/p][/quote]5-0 Gooners then mate have fun![/p][/quote]the best thing about being a saint for the last 3 seasons is that it's been fun and the majority of us have loed the ride.........you on the other hand are just bizzarly negative ......... get yer glad rags on and continue to tease those sailors , you know it's what you do best ! slugger

7:09pm Sat 8 Sep 12

batesieboy says...

This bloke came up to me in a pub in Bangkok during the ManUre game and started shouting at me about NA being disgusting etc etc. some Brighton blokes have not forgotten the jocular "keep up" comment...despite the fact they haven't kept up!! So Fatty is not the only weirdo from those parts!
This bloke came up to me in a pub in Bangkok during the ManUre game and started shouting at me about NA being disgusting etc etc. some Brighton blokes have not forgotten the jocular "keep up" comment...despite the fact they haven't kept up!! So Fatty is not the only weirdo from those parts! batesieboy

7:25pm Sat 8 Sep 12

andysaints007 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
andysaints007 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick!
i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints!
That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?
Wow - when did you have your sense of humour bypass? Donut
Thanks very much for the compliment, if you read through the posts more carefully you will understand what I was up to. I like donuts, especially those with a non-fattening centre.
I don't have time to waste going all the way through the posts and then back again! I say it as I see as I go through them! Just cos later on you realise what a pr*ck you are and try to make out you were joking is just a little bit sad really !
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]andysaints007[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: only sign him if his dad is also called harry cornick! i`ve always wanted to see Harry Cornick jnr play for saints![/p][/quote]That's Connick, not Cornick! Who or what is Kemp?[/p][/quote]Wow - when did you have your sense of humour bypass? Donut[/p][/quote]Thanks very much for the compliment, if you read through the posts more carefully you will understand what I was up to. I like donuts, especially those with a non-fattening centre.[/p][/quote]I don't have time to waste going all the way through the posts and then back again! I say it as I see as I go through them! Just cos later on you realise what a pr*ck you are and try to make out you were joking is just a little bit sad really ! andysaints007

7:29pm Sat 8 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

I'll save you some time then, just look at my 4.43pm post and maybe you will understand my jest, I don't know what your problem is but it is certainly not me that is having a sense of humour failure.
I'll save you some time then, just look at my 4.43pm post and maybe you will understand my jest, I don't know what your problem is but it is certainly not me that is having a sense of humour failure. OSPREYSAINT

8:35pm Sat 8 Sep 12

WobblyCat says...

Fatty x Ford Worker wrote:
Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre!
Fat boy if our forum and our transit van factory is good enough fo you whats your beef with the Saints?
[quote][p][bold]Fatty x Ford Worker[/bold] wrote: Ah what the damage against the goonerrs then smart @sre![/p][/quote]Fat boy if our forum and our transit van factory is good enough fo you whats your beef with the Saints? WobblyCat

8:42pm Sat 8 Sep 12

WobblyCat says...

warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate

ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens? WobblyCat

8:58pm Sat 8 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate


ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
[quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew! OSPREYSAINT

10:14pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate


ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
No Wobbly, warrens for my old pub, back in the day, 76 for the FA cup.
[quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]No Wobbly, warrens for my old pub, back in the day, 76 for the FA cup. warrens 76

10:22pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate



ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of. warrens 76

10:24pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

"Do you like Frank Sinatra"
"Harry Cornick junior, I won't ave im in the ouse".
"Do you like Frank Sinatra" "Harry Cornick junior, I won't ave im in the ouse". warrens 76

10:25pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate









ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence? Seedhouse the Unrepentant

10:33pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate










ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective. warrens 76

10:45pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate











ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

10:49pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Baddesley Bill says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate











ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I revel in the demise of skuntism...sorry n all...I just can't help it....come on Crawley Town! :O)
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I revel in the demise of skuntism...sorry n all...I just can't help it....come on Crawley Town! :O) Baddesley Bill

10:56pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate












ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears. warrens 76

11:07pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate













ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

11:10pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

What's wrong with the word p0rn?
What's wrong with the word p0rn? Seedhouse the Unrepentant

11:16pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
What's wrong with the word p0rn?
Nothing, a welcome distraction between posts, i believe!
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: What's wrong with the word p0rn?[/p][/quote]Nothing, a welcome distraction between posts, i believe! warrens 76

11:17pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate














ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
He most certainly is not "my" skunt..
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]He most certainly is not "my" skunt.. warrens 76

11:21pm Sat 8 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate














ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist.. warrens 76

11:32pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate















ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..
Nope just saying why they are very different to us.

I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way!
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..[/p][/quote]Nope just saying why they are very different to us. I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way! Seedhouse the Unrepentant

12:19am Sun 9 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

are we all looking forward to the huge local deby sky have dished up for us tomorrow then?
come on crawley!
are we all looking forward to the huge local deby sky have dished up for us tomorrow then? come on crawley! saintshorse101

9:02am Sun 9 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate




ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different? OSPREYSAINT

10:04am Sun 9 Sep 12

Lord red heart says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
Maybe not if the truth was told
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?[/p][/quote]Maybe not if the truth was told Lord red heart

10:06am Sun 9 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate





ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
Good response Os...
Are you going to the Arsenal?

Ticket office has allegedly sold out, but they said that for City and there were loads of empty seats..
For anyone who cannot get a ticky we bought ours through an agent in London, cost us including booking fees about £20 more than SFC site..
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?[/p][/quote]Good response Os... Are you going to the Arsenal? Ticket office has allegedly sold out, but they said that for City and there were loads of empty seats.. For anyone who cannot get a ticky we bought ours through an agent in London, cost us including booking fees about £20 more than SFC site.. warrens 76

10:07am Sun 9 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate





ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
Good response Os...
Are you going to the Arsenal?

Ticket office has allegedly sold out, but they said that for City and there were loads of empty seats..
For anyone who cannot get a ticky we bought ours through an agent in London, cost us including booking fees about £20 more than SFC site..
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?[/p][/quote]Good response Os... Are you going to the Arsenal? Ticket office has allegedly sold out, but they said that for City and there were loads of empty seats.. For anyone who cannot get a ticky we bought ours through an agent in London, cost us including booking fees about £20 more than SFC site.. warrens 76

10:11am Sun 9 Sep 12

slugger says...

all a bit deep for me , is it ok to to loath pompey just for the sake of it ?
all a bit deep for me , is it ok to to loath pompey just for the sake of it ? slugger

10:12am Sun 9 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Can't do the Arsenal match had another pre-planned event to attend to, hope to do a few more away games, as I retire at the end of next week, I'll have more time but less loot so not going to do too many.
Can't do the Arsenal match had another pre-planned event to attend to, hope to do a few more away games, as I retire at the end of next week, I'll have more time but less loot so not going to do too many. OSPREYSAINT

10:12am Sun 9 Sep 12

St Retford says...

OSPREYSAINT wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate





ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
I bloody would. If we got bought by an arms dealer I think I would probably think twice about going to games.

The only thing that makes stunts think twice about going to games is when their team becomes rubbish.

Therein lies the difference between us. It's a thing called 'class'.
[quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?[/p][/quote]I bloody would. If we got bought by an arms dealer I think I would probably think twice about going to games. The only thing that makes stunts think twice about going to games is when their team becomes rubbish. Therein lies the difference between us. It's a thing called 'class'. St Retford

10:13am Sun 9 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

slugger wrote:
all a bit deep for me , is it ok to to loath pompey just for the sake of it ?
Quite normal activity, each to their own. They are like Marmite, you either love, loath or leave them.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: all a bit deep for me , is it ok to to loath pompey just for the sake of it ?[/p][/quote]Quite normal activity, each to their own. They are like Marmite, you either love, loath or leave them. OSPREYSAINT

10:22am Sun 9 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Remember some quotes from Nicola Cortese = "Southampton is my baby; I'm not going to abandon it". In a statement on the club's website, Cortese claimed that he had been approached but that he remained totally committed to Southampton" and "Clubs spend money they do not have; they spend next year’s income. They spend money that will not arrive for two years and say, . It cannot be sustained. In good times you need to be saving money for the bad times. If we reach the Premier League, I would like to be in a position where we did not need parachute payments. In good years you should put money away for the bad years.

A somewhat different approach to that of our Blue rivals.
Remember some quotes from Nicola Cortese = "Southampton is my baby; I'm not going to abandon it". In a statement on the club's website, Cortese claimed that he had been approached [by AC Milan] but that he remained totally committed to Southampton" and "Clubs spend money they do not have; they spend next year’s income. They spend money that will not arrive for two years and say, ["But we'll have some success and bring in more cash to cover the shortfall"]. It cannot be sustained. In good times you need to be saving money for the bad times. If we reach the Premier League, I would like to be in a position where we did not need parachute payments. In good years you should put money away for the bad years. A somewhat different approach to that of our Blue rivals. OSPREYSAINT

10:30am Sun 9 Sep 12

willygetaway says...

Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road.
But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.)
i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers
i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.
Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun. willygetaway

10:31am Sun 9 Sep 12

Confucious says...

slugger wrote:
all a bit deep for me , is it ok to to loath pompey just for the sake of it ?
It's fine as long as you are free of all prejudice. All skunts should be hated equally.
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: all a bit deep for me , is it ok to to loath pompey just for the sake of it ?[/p][/quote]It's fine as long as you are free of all prejudice. All skunts should be hated equally. Confucious

10:43am Sun 9 Sep 12

slugger says...

just found out that toothpaste was invented in portsmouth ........ anywhere else and it would have been called teethpaste .
just found out that toothpaste was invented in portsmouth ........ anywhere else and it would have been called teethpaste . slugger

10:55am Sun 9 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

willygetaway wrote:
Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road.
But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.)
i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers
i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.
"gentlemen, I rest my case, after the war is over life becomes boring, we need 5kates to re-inforce just how blessed we are."
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.[/p][/quote]"gentlemen, I rest my case, after the war is over life becomes boring, we need 5kates to re-inforce just how blessed we are." warrens 76

10:56am Sun 9 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

slugger wrote:
just found out that toothpaste was invented in portsmouth ........ anywhere else and it would have been called teethpaste .
Excellent Smithers!
[quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: just found out that toothpaste was invented in portsmouth ........ anywhere else and it would have been called teethpaste .[/p][/quote]Excellent Smithers! warrens 76

11:52am Sun 9 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

willygetaway wrote:
Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.
I, like you have said, have some good friends who are of the blue persuasion, and i have some good banter with them, and i feel for them.
I never have and never will understand the need for the rivalry to turn into violence.
I am undecided wether the club should be liquidated or not,
i feel for the local businesses, taxman (us) and charities who have been robbed by the club i wish that the club should be made to pay these back in full over a (blue) few years even if that means having less players or staff, or even playing the youth and them being down the bottom of the leagues.

then i read comments on the fews website from fans saying how they would be ok just get a new CVA and things will be good! no compassion for anybody who has and are suffering because of the clubs actions. they think its great that they now only have to pay less than 1p in the £ from the first CVA. the tax bills dropped to less than £1/2 mill from over £25mill from that CVA! £24+mill from public funds which could have paid for so much particularly these days. when they are reminded of this they just say "we know about that but want our club to survive". they have no shame and are not embarrassed! blaming everyone and anyone else and not taking any responsibility themselves!
clubs should only be allowed to survive if they are viable and over the last few years poopey hasnt been! it comes to something when a club deliberately avoids paying tax to pay its players because it knows they will be punished more for not paying the players.
if it was liquidated at the end of last season, as it should have been, the fans would of had time to start `afc poopey` and entered a low low league. they would then have lost the `history` they so love
as i said i am torn between wanting them to survive and pay back their debts and just wanting rid of the lot of them. i think though robbing them of their much mentioned `history` swings it for me as there will be a pheonix club and we can `hate` that just as much.
[quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.[/p][/quote]I, like you have said, have some good friends who are of the blue persuasion, and i have some good banter with them, and i feel for them. I never have and never will understand the need for the rivalry to turn into violence. I am undecided wether the club should be liquidated or not, i feel for the local businesses, taxman (us) and charities who have been robbed by the club i wish that the club should be made to pay these back in full over a (blue) few years even if that means having less players or staff, or even playing the youth and them being down the bottom of the leagues. then i read comments on the fews website from fans saying how they would be ok just get a new CVA and things will be good! no compassion for anybody who has and are suffering because of the clubs actions. they think its great that they now only have to pay less than 1p in the £ from the first CVA. the tax bills dropped to less than £1/2 mill from over £25mill from that CVA! £24+mill from public funds which could have paid for so much particularly these days. when they are reminded of this they just say "we know about that but want our club to survive". they have no shame and are not embarrassed! blaming everyone and anyone else and not taking any responsibility themselves! clubs should only be allowed to survive if they are viable and over the last few years poopey hasnt been! it comes to something when a club deliberately avoids paying tax to pay its players because it knows they will be punished more for not paying the players. if it was liquidated at the end of last season, as it should have been, the fans would of had time to start `afc poopey` and entered a low low league. they would then have lost the `history` they so love as i said i am torn between wanting them to survive and pay back their debts and just wanting rid of the lot of them. i think though robbing them of their much mentioned `history` swings it for me as there will be a pheonix club and we can `hate` that just as much. saintshorse101

12:22pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Pogle says...

warrens 76 wrote:
slugger wrote:
just found out that toothpaste was invented in portsmouth ........ anywhere else and it would have been called teethpaste .
Excellent Smithers!
It is indeed!
[quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: just found out that toothpaste was invented in portsmouth ........ anywhere else and it would have been called teethpaste .[/p][/quote]Excellent Smithers![/p][/quote]It is indeed! Pogle

12:35pm Sun 9 Sep 12

mack chinnon says...

saintshorse101 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.
I, like you have said, have some good friends who are of the blue persuasion, and i have some good banter with them, and i feel for them.
I never have and never will understand the need for the rivalry to turn into violence.
I am undecided wether the club should be liquidated or not,
i feel for the local businesses, taxman (us) and charities who have been robbed by the club i wish that the club should be made to pay these back in full over a (blue) few years even if that means having less players or staff, or even playing the youth and them being down the bottom of the leagues.

then i read comments on the fews website from fans saying how they would be ok just get a new CVA and things will be good! no compassion for anybody who has and are suffering because of the clubs actions. they think its great that they now only have to pay less than 1p in the £ from the first CVA. the tax bills dropped to less than £1/2 mill from over £25mill from that CVA! £24+mill from public funds which could have paid for so much particularly these days. when they are reminded of this they just say "we know about that but want our club to survive". they have no shame and are not embarrassed! blaming everyone and anyone else and not taking any responsibility themselves!
clubs should only be allowed to survive if they are viable and over the last few years poopey hasnt been! it comes to something when a club deliberately avoids paying tax to pay its players because it knows they will be punished more for not paying the players.
if it was liquidated at the end of last season, as it should have been, the fans would of had time to start `afc poopey` and entered a low low league. they would then have lost the `history` they so love
as i said i am torn between wanting them to survive and pay back their debts and just wanting rid of the lot of them. i think though robbing them of their much mentioned `history` swings it for me as there will be a pheonix club and we can `hate` that just as much.
They should of been put down years ago.
No sympathy at all.
Come on Crawley
[quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.[/p][/quote]I, like you have said, have some good friends who are of the blue persuasion, and i have some good banter with them, and i feel for them. I never have and never will understand the need for the rivalry to turn into violence. I am undecided wether the club should be liquidated or not, i feel for the local businesses, taxman (us) and charities who have been robbed by the club i wish that the club should be made to pay these back in full over a (blue) few years even if that means having less players or staff, or even playing the youth and them being down the bottom of the leagues. then i read comments on the fews website from fans saying how they would be ok just get a new CVA and things will be good! no compassion for anybody who has and are suffering because of the clubs actions. they think its great that they now only have to pay less than 1p in the £ from the first CVA. the tax bills dropped to less than £1/2 mill from over £25mill from that CVA! £24+mill from public funds which could have paid for so much particularly these days. when they are reminded of this they just say "we know about that but want our club to survive". they have no shame and are not embarrassed! blaming everyone and anyone else and not taking any responsibility themselves! clubs should only be allowed to survive if they are viable and over the last few years poopey hasnt been! it comes to something when a club deliberately avoids paying tax to pay its players because it knows they will be punished more for not paying the players. if it was liquidated at the end of last season, as it should have been, the fans would of had time to start `afc poopey` and entered a low low league. they would then have lost the `history` they so love as i said i am torn between wanting them to survive and pay back their debts and just wanting rid of the lot of them. i think though robbing them of their much mentioned `history` swings it for me as there will be a pheonix club and we can `hate` that just as much.[/p][/quote]They should of been put down years ago. No sympathy at all. Come on Crawley mack chinnon

1:47pm Sun 9 Sep 12

randre says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate
















ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..
Nope just saying why they are very different to us.

I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way!
I think the fact that the skunt supporters still allude to that cup win so affectionately and try to make it a point to prove of their proud history says it all. After all the mess that "buying" the fa cup has caused not only to their own club but the fact it was money stollen from tax payers, charities and local businesses. Yet many Pompey supporters are still so proud of it. Sums them up to me.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..[/p][/quote]Nope just saying why they are very different to us. I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way![/p][/quote]I think the fact that the skunt supporters still allude to that cup win so affectionately and try to make it a point to prove of their proud history says it all. After all the mess that "buying" the fa cup has caused not only to their own club but the fact it was money stollen from tax payers, charities and local businesses. Yet many Pompey supporters are still so proud of it. Sums them up to me. randre

1:47pm Sun 9 Sep 12

randre says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate
















ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..
Nope just saying why they are very different to us.

I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way!
I think the fact that the skunt supporters still allude to that cup win so affectionately and try to make it a point to prove of their proud history says it all. After all the mess that "buying" the fa cup has caused not only to their own club but the fact it was money stollen from tax payers, charities and local businesses. Yet many Pompey supporters are still so proud of it. Sums them up to me.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..[/p][/quote]Nope just saying why they are very different to us. I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way![/p][/quote]I think the fact that the skunt supporters still allude to that cup win so affectionately and try to make it a point to prove of their proud history says it all. After all the mess that "buying" the fa cup has caused not only to their own club but the fact it was money stollen from tax payers, charities and local businesses. Yet many Pompey supporters are still so proud of it. Sums them up to me. randre

2:32pm Sun 9 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

randre wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate

















ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..
Nope just saying why they are very different to us.

I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way!
I think the fact that the skunt supporters still allude to that cup win so affectionately and try to make it a point to prove of their proud history says it all. After all the mess that "buying" the fa cup has caused not only to their own club but the fact it was money stollen from tax payers, charities and local businesses. Yet many Pompey supporters are still so proud of it. Sums them up to me.
That I cannot argue with...no shame on their part were that is concerned...
[quote][p][bold]randre[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..[/p][/quote]Nope just saying why they are very different to us. I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way![/p][/quote]I think the fact that the skunt supporters still allude to that cup win so affectionately and try to make it a point to prove of their proud history says it all. After all the mess that "buying" the fa cup has caused not only to their own club but the fact it was money stollen from tax payers, charities and local businesses. Yet many Pompey supporters are still so proud of it. Sums them up to me.[/p][/quote]That I cannot argue with...no shame on their part were that is concerned... warrens 76

2:54pm Sun 9 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

Do you all realise that as league standings go we are still..top of the league, top of the league we are Souuthampton, we're top of the league...unfortunate
ly and only for a while the one below.
Do you all realise that as league standings go we are still..top of the league, top of the league we are Souuthampton, we're top of the league...unfortunate ly and only for a while the one below. warrens 76

5:26pm Sun 9 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

mack chinnon wrote:
saintshorse101 wrote:
willygetaway wrote:
Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.
I, like you have said, have some good friends who are of the blue persuasion, and i have some good banter with them, and i feel for them.
I never have and never will understand the need for the rivalry to turn into violence.
I am undecided wether the club should be liquidated or not,
i feel for the local businesses, taxman (us) and charities who have been robbed by the club i wish that the club should be made to pay these back in full over a (blue) few years even if that means having less players or staff, or even playing the youth and them being down the bottom of the leagues.

then i read comments on the fews website from fans saying how they would be ok just get a new CVA and things will be good! no compassion for anybody who has and are suffering because of the clubs actions. they think its great that they now only have to pay less than 1p in the £ from the first CVA. the tax bills dropped to less than £1/2 mill from over £25mill from that CVA! £24+mill from public funds which could have paid for so much particularly these days. when they are reminded of this they just say "we know about that but want our club to survive". they have no shame and are not embarrassed! blaming everyone and anyone else and not taking any responsibility themselves!
clubs should only be allowed to survive if they are viable and over the last few years poopey hasnt been! it comes to something when a club deliberately avoids paying tax to pay its players because it knows they will be punished more for not paying the players.
if it was liquidated at the end of last season, as it should have been, the fans would of had time to start `afc poopey` and entered a low low league. they would then have lost the `history` they so love
as i said i am torn between wanting them to survive and pay back their debts and just wanting rid of the lot of them. i think though robbing them of their much mentioned `history` swings it for me as there will be a pheonix club and we can `hate` that just as much.
They should of been put down years ago.
No sympathy at all.
Come on Crawley
Looks like the Blue Phew have bought out the Officials today Crawley down to nine players and 3 0 to the Skates!
[quote][p][bold]mack chinnon[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]saintshorse101[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]willygetaway[/bold] wrote: Well Guys, i know some people from skuntsville on a personal level as i suspect do most of us and away from the rivalry's i find them just another bunch of guys who dare i say it i like but Never suppose that as soon as it comes to my team i am RED and WHiTE to the core. and have in my earlier days had many a happy time sending them packing down the Fratton road. But i want the rivalry with the blue few and dare i say it i enjoy the banter that the Mongs sometimes come out with (when they can construct a sentence together.) i dont want rivalry with the mummys boys of bore mouth or lifting the skirts of the Brighton crossdressers i want what we have always had, good old fashion hatred of something blue and smelling of dead fish in the midday sun.[/p][/quote]I, like you have said, have some good friends who are of the blue persuasion, and i have some good banter with them, and i feel for them. I never have and never will understand the need for the rivalry to turn into violence. I am undecided wether the club should be liquidated or not, i feel for the local businesses, taxman (us) and charities who have been robbed by the club i wish that the club should be made to pay these back in full over a (blue) few years even if that means having less players or staff, or even playing the youth and them being down the bottom of the leagues. then i read comments on the fews website from fans saying how they would be ok just get a new CVA and things will be good! no compassion for anybody who has and are suffering because of the clubs actions. they think its great that they now only have to pay less than 1p in the £ from the first CVA. the tax bills dropped to less than £1/2 mill from over £25mill from that CVA! £24+mill from public funds which could have paid for so much particularly these days. when they are reminded of this they just say "we know about that but want our club to survive". they have no shame and are not embarrassed! blaming everyone and anyone else and not taking any responsibility themselves! clubs should only be allowed to survive if they are viable and over the last few years poopey hasnt been! it comes to something when a club deliberately avoids paying tax to pay its players because it knows they will be punished more for not paying the players. if it was liquidated at the end of last season, as it should have been, the fans would of had time to start `afc poopey` and entered a low low league. they would then have lost the `history` they so love as i said i am torn between wanting them to survive and pay back their debts and just wanting rid of the lot of them. i think though robbing them of their much mentioned `history` swings it for me as there will be a pheonix club and we can `hate` that just as much.[/p][/quote]They should of been put down years ago. No sympathy at all. Come on Crawley[/p][/quote]Looks like the Blue Phew have bought out the Officials today Crawley down to nine players and 3 0 to the Skates! OSPREYSAINT

5:32pm Sun 9 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

looks like the fish have signed the ref on a 1 month contract!
worst refereeing display i have seen in many many years! sent 2 crawley players off for nothing decisions and fails to do the same for poopeys players, then send off the crawley manager!
looks like he sent the crawley player off to help poopey, but even with 10 men crawley looked as good if not better than the fish so he sent another player off!
action needs to be taken when refs are as bad as this! poopey would probably only drawn todays game but for the ref.
i am so glad we are out of the football league and away from refs as bad as that today. i know refs make mistakes and thats ok we all do, but to make as many as he has done today?

cue the pain in spain, fishin the hand, blueredndead! hello girls we havent missed you! and we know the ref won today!
looks like the fish have signed the ref on a 1 month contract! worst refereeing display i have seen in many many years! sent 2 crawley players off for nothing decisions and fails to do the same for poopeys players, then send off the crawley manager! looks like he sent the crawley player off to help poopey, but even with 10 men crawley looked as good if not better than the fish so he sent another player off! action needs to be taken when refs are as bad as this! poopey would probably only drawn todays game but for the ref. i am so glad we are out of the football league and away from refs as bad as that today. i know refs make mistakes and thats ok we all do, but to make as many as he has done today? cue the pain in spain, fishin the hand, blueredndead! hello girls we havent missed you! and we know the ref won today! saintshorse101

5:43pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

I see they still cheat.
I see they still cheat. Seedhouse the Unrepentant

5:50pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Baddesley Bill says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I see they still cheat.
The News is reporting a bid from a middle eastern consortium...deja vu?...I trust you still have the fake sheik costume in storage! :O)
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I see they still cheat.[/p][/quote]The News is reporting a bid from a middle eastern consortium...deja vu?...I trust you still have the fake sheik costume in storage! :O) Baddesley Bill

5:56pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I see they still cheat.
The News is reporting a bid from a middle eastern consortium...deja vu?...I trust you still have the fake sheik costume in storage! :O)
I do. I see they wish to remain anonymous thereby ensuring we can't all see that they are camel stealing fish fiddlers. Same old same old. Probably BC in disguise - again.

The drama goes on!
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I see they still cheat.[/p][/quote]The News is reporting a bid from a middle eastern consortium...deja vu?...I trust you still have the fake sheik costume in storage! :O)[/p][/quote]I do. I see they wish to remain anonymous thereby ensuring we can't all see that they are camel stealing fish fiddlers. Same old same old. Probably BC in disguise - again. The drama goes on! Seedhouse the Unrepentant

6:20pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
Mush On The Beach wrote:
slugger wrote:
Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
slugger wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate
















ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.
Spot on.
cannot possibly agree , let em die i say !
Yep
just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR !
Ask Linesman
He's a skunt for sure.

Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline.

My monies is on another deadline!
I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC.

They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..
You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?
Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.
I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.
Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors...

Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.
If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder.

What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.
Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..
Nope just saying why they are very different to us.

I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way!
There is no way I could ever support a club (or any other organisation) funded by millions made illegally selling arms used in a brutal war in Africa involving thousands of child soldiers. Dirty money. Blood money. That is why I am happy to support Saints. Honest money made by a good man.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mush On The Beach[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]slugger[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Who are we going to take the p!ss out of if the dirty stinking fish fiddlers do go? A Bummouth derby just won't have the same edge to it.[/p][/quote]Spot on.[/p][/quote]cannot possibly agree , let em die i say ![/p][/quote]Yep[/p][/quote]just how much do they owe the taxman (our money) now ?....... not to mention all the other creditors .......and they're allowed to continue for the umpteenth time , swallowing even more of our money that will never be repaid .......... can anyone name me another business that would get away with this ? ..........if i were a skate (shudder) i'd be ashamed ......... but they're not ! ....... says it all imo . ......... COYR ![/p][/quote]Ask Linesman[/p][/quote]He's a skunt for sure. Well in a week or so they will either be fan owned or BC owned or liquidising. Unless we get another deadline. My monies is on another deadline![/p][/quote]I accept we were not and would not be given the same indulgence as portsmuff, but the fans are not responsible for the club, directors are and look at our sorry history before Marcus "god rest his soul" and NC. They will get another deadline no question but do not wish on the other fella want you cannot take yourself..[/p][/quote]You say that. Lowe may have been a total **** but he didn't have bloody on his hands. We haven't bought Ramirez with money made by selling guns to Angola to kill their own people. If our owners were of that kind I would have very serious misgivings and believe most Saints fans would. Why has Pompey has a succession of bent owners? Is it just co-incidence?[/p][/quote]Listen, I know they hate us, I get it, clearly there is a lot of bad feeling from our side towards them, I have been up close and personal with em so know one needs to tell me what a scummy place or nasty people they can be.....but their fans do not pick the directors anymore than any ofus on here wisely chose Marcus, did you choose him, did I, did Slugger, Osprey, anyone NO..we had no and have no say in the good or bad decisions made by the board..neither did they, I don't like em but be objective.[/p][/quote]I am. I'm saying if we won the FA cup with money from someone like Gaydamak I'm not sure I'd be there. I loved being at the JPT won with the help of legit money made by an honest and decent man.[/p][/quote]Seedhouse I liked it too...but think what you are saying, are you calling for an audit of the clubs account before supporting them, are you withdrawing your support of the club you love because of the bankruptcy forced on your club through a director...we support our club, our town, our community, not the b****y directors... Fans start taking the moral responsibility of the directors as a basis of support...there would be no Brighton, Leeds, Chelsea, Mufc, actually half the bloody league would be gone, christ were would you draw the line taxes owed to the public? well that's us screwed, ..come on...your confusing apples with pears.[/p][/quote]If someones a dodgy car dealer or owns **** shops I dont care, but I wouldn't support a club owned by someone dealing in mass murder. What I'm trying to say is maybe due to the fact your skunt doesn't care is why certain types of owners gravitate towards owning clubs like them in the first place and other types towards clubs like us. Maybe the fan does have an influence in that sense.[/p][/quote]Your thinking way to deep seedhouse, way to deep, maybe you have a moral authority completely lacking in most other supporters,,,but be careful you're not seeking a justification for your dislike of them ...it is not necessary you do not need a justification they exist ergo you must resist, you must resist..[/p][/quote]Nope just saying why they are very different to us. I don't care whether its BC, PST or liquidised. All options will be fun in their own way![/p][/quote]There is no way I could ever support a club (or any other organisation) funded by millions made illegally selling arms used in a brutal war in Africa involving thousands of child soldiers. Dirty money. Blood money. That is why I am happy to support Saints. Honest money made by a good man. Cpt. Kirk's illegitimate love child

7:28pm Sun 9 Sep 12

mack chinnon says...

Seedhouse the Unrepentant wrote:
I see they still cheat.
Ive had enough of those cheating gnikcuf stnuc.
They should be history.
Why compete if it isnt an even playing field.
Come on Walsall.
[quote][p][bold]Seedhouse the Unrepentant[/bold] wrote: I see they still cheat.[/p][/quote]Ive had enough of those cheating gnikcuf stnuc. They should be history. Why compete if it isnt an even playing field. Come on Walsall. mack chinnon

9:07pm Sun 9 Sep 12

randre says...

I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground!

I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out.

Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team.

But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys
I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground! I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out. Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team. But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys randre

9:39pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Baddesley Bill says...

randre wrote:
I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground!

I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out.

Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team.

But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys
We'll be ok....they won't! :O)
[quote][p][bold]randre[/bold] wrote: I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground! I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out. Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team. But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys[/p][/quote]We'll be ok....they won't! :O) Baddesley Bill

10:22pm Sun 9 Sep 12

RedArmy1 says...

Baddesley Bill wrote:
randre wrote: I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground! I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out. Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team. But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys
We'll be ok....they won't! :O)
WE ARE SOUTHAMPTON.

We go with a Full squad to Ars*nil to WIN

RED ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMY
[quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]randre[/bold] wrote: I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground! I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out. Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team. But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys[/p][/quote]We'll be ok....they won't! :O)[/p][/quote]WE ARE SOUTHAMPTON. We go with a Full squad to Ars*nil to WIN RED ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMY RedArmy1

11:46pm Sun 9 Sep 12

randre says...

RedArmy1 wrote:
Baddesley Bill wrote:
randre wrote: I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground! I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out. Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team. But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys
We'll be ok....they won't! :O)
WE ARE SOUTHAMPTON.

We go with a Full squad to Ars*nil to WIN

RED ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMY
Love it... I was waiting for that....
[quote][p][bold]RedArmy1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Baddesley Bill[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]randre[/bold] wrote: I am still amazed by the refereeing today. There seems no end to the life lines Pompey are given. Still no shame. But they will soon be on here saying "we've got out first win, you haven't"! Regardless of the fact they have played five, we have played 3, they are in league 1 with a borrowed side and a borrowed ref, we are in the best league in the world with all our own team and own ground! I thought at the start of the season when the fixtures came our that our first points will come at home to villa, for some reason I was a little concerned about Wigan, after all they were one of the firm teams after Christmas, it was never going to be as easy as some made out. Whatever happens this year I am so proud of our team and the way it is run. I am proud of the way we play football and it is early days. I think we will stay up, but if we don't I'm still going to be really proud of our team. But I believe we are good enough, we are Southampton, we are proud and we stand tall on the South Coast. We will stay up, that I'm sure... Coys[/p][/quote]We'll be ok....they won't! :O)[/p][/quote]WE ARE SOUTHAMPTON. We go with a Full squad to Ars*nil to WIN RED ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMY[/p][/quote]Love it... I was waiting for that.... randre

6:02am Mon 10 Sep 12

Flashin the pan says...

So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again!
Arsenal 4-0
Pompey 3-0
Magandang umaga!
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga! Flashin the pan

6:03am Mon 10 Sep 12

Flashin the pan says...

So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again!
Arsenal 4-0
Pompey 3-0
Magandang umaga!
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga! Flashin the pan

7:32am Mon 10 Sep 12

Seedhouse the Unrepentant says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again!
Arsenal 4-0
Pompey 3-0
Magandang umaga!
You mean Channers under another disguise willing to wreck the club from top to bottom?

Hahahahahahahaha




Skunt
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga![/p][/quote]You mean Channers under another disguise willing to wreck the club from top to bottom? Hahahahahahahaha Skunt Seedhouse the Unrepentant

8:37am Mon 10 Sep 12

mack chinnon says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again!
Arsenal 4-0
Pompey 3-0
Magandang umaga!
Come on Walsall.
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga![/p][/quote]Come on Walsall. mack chinnon

8:49am Mon 10 Sep 12

Stroppy_gramps says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga!
because the kipper shed has done so well with arab owners hasn't it.......
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga![/p][/quote]because the kipper shed has done so well with arab owners hasn't it....... Stroppy_gramps

9:28am Mon 10 Sep 12

Alicesdad says...

A million years ago, on Friday, this thread was about a young lad called Harry Cornick.

Sooner or later it all seems to revert to some supporter from a much much lower league club rambling on about their dreams of doing as well as The Saints. Rebuilding like the Saints, getting back to the Premiership like the Saints, having a brilliant squad like the Saints, buying players like the Saints. The whiff of envy in every post they make is pure perfume to the cultured Saints fan nose.

Or to put it simply for the hard of thinking, living up to the sheer dream of being The Saints.

Maybe you'll be lucky and somebody with shedloads of cash will buy them. In the meantimne they must feel free to bask in our glory, and warm themselves in the bright sunny rays of our brilliance.

Aaaah I love the smell of jealousy in the morning ....
A million years ago, on Friday, this thread was about a young lad called Harry Cornick. Sooner or later it all seems to revert to some supporter from a much much lower league club rambling on about their dreams of doing as well as The Saints. Rebuilding like the Saints, getting back to the Premiership like the Saints, having a brilliant squad like the Saints, buying players like the Saints. The whiff of envy in every post they make is pure perfume to the cultured Saints fan nose. Or to put it simply for the hard of thinking, living up to the sheer dream of being The Saints. Maybe you'll be lucky and somebody with shedloads of cash will buy them. In the meantimne they must feel free to bask in our glory, and warm themselves in the bright sunny rays of our brilliance. Aaaah I love the smell of jealousy in the morning .... Alicesdad

10:36am Mon 10 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

Alicesdad wrote:
A million years ago, on Friday, this thread was about a young lad called Harry Cornick. Sooner or later it all seems to revert to some supporter from a much much lower league club rambling on about their dreams of doing as well as The Saints. Rebuilding like the Saints, getting back to the Premiership like the Saints, having a brilliant squad like the Saints, buying players like the Saints. The whiff of envy in every post they make is pure perfume to the cultured Saints fan nose. Or to put it simply for the hard of thinking, living up to the sheer dream of being The Saints. Maybe you'll be lucky and somebody with shedloads of cash will buy them. In the meantimne they must feel free to bask in our glory, and warm themselves in the bright sunny rays of our brilliance. Aaaah I love the smell of jealousy in the morning ....
in a nutshell!!
love it, love it.
though calling it a supporter of the poor team down the road is a bit over the top, it spends all its time dreaming of being a saint and spends all its time comparing the fish to us! therefore setting the saints as a benchmark that the fish are trying to aspire to!
[quote][p][bold]Alicesdad[/bold] wrote: A million years ago, on Friday, this thread was about a young lad called Harry Cornick. Sooner or later it all seems to revert to some supporter from a much much lower league club rambling on about their dreams of doing as well as The Saints. Rebuilding like the Saints, getting back to the Premiership like the Saints, having a brilliant squad like the Saints, buying players like the Saints. The whiff of envy in every post they make is pure perfume to the cultured Saints fan nose. Or to put it simply for the hard of thinking, living up to the sheer dream of being The Saints. Maybe you'll be lucky and somebody with shedloads of cash will buy them. In the meantimne they must feel free to bask in our glory, and warm themselves in the bright sunny rays of our brilliance. Aaaah I love the smell of jealousy in the morning ....[/p][/quote]in a nutshell!! love it, love it. though calling it a supporter of the poor team down the road is a bit over the top, it spends all its time dreaming of being a saint and spends all its time comparing the fish to us! therefore setting the saints as a benchmark that the fish are trying to aspire to! saintshorse101

10:50am Mon 10 Sep 12

saintshorse101 says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga!
did you not watch the saints play manure then? you said you did!
so are we not allowed to watch crawley? you see when there is an international break the big teams dont play so sky are forced to put truly awful games on, i think they call it comedy day! i did watch yes and what i saw was 10 men of crawley being as good if not better than 12 men of poopey. only when your 12th man sent off the second crawley player did you manage to get some goals! even with 9 men crawley still should have scored.
so is it al mirage coming back for you then? £12.5mill into a bank account, is that money borrowed from balrain?
is it so he can put another charge on the shed?
seems strang that the administrator turns down both bids and then the arabs turn up. i thought it was only the sun that had a fake sheik, but you found at least 1 other!
now swim along little fishy!
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga![/p][/quote]did you not watch the saints play manure then? you said you did! so are we not allowed to watch crawley? you see when there is an international break the big teams dont play so sky are forced to put truly awful games on, i think they call it comedy day! i did watch yes and what i saw was 10 men of crawley being as good if not better than 12 men of poopey. only when your 12th man sent off the second crawley player did you manage to get some goals! even with 9 men crawley still should have scored. so is it al mirage coming back for you then? £12.5mill into a bank account, is that money borrowed from balrain? is it so he can put another charge on the shed? seems strang that the administrator turns down both bids and then the arabs turn up. i thought it was only the sun that had a fake sheik, but you found at least 1 other! now swim along little fishy! saintshorse101

10:55am Mon 10 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

Flashin the pan wrote:
So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again!
Arsenal 4-0
Pompey 3-0
Magandang umaga!
With a bit of luck the Arab consortium led by Sheik El Kieda will do the job properly this time.
[quote][p][bold]Flashin the pan[/bold] wrote: So all you scummers watched Pompey win yesterday. The goals were great but the rest of the game was cr-p.Still looks as though we have a new consortium of arabs looking to buy the club, willing to spend loads on rebuilding the club from top to bottom. If so Pompey will be reborn again! Arsenal 4-0 Pompey 3-0 Magandang umaga![/p][/quote]With a bit of luck the Arab consortium led by Sheik El Kieda will do the job properly this time. OSPREYSAINT

12:45pm Mon 10 Sep 12

st1halo says...

St Retford wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate






ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
I bloody would. If we got bought by an arms dealer I think I would probably think twice about going to games.

The only thing that makes stunts think twice about going to games is when their team becomes rubbish.

Therein lies the difference between us. It's a thing called 'class'.
Realise this as an old thread now but have to say my piece.
I agree with Warrens... Football was invented in this great country and born out of rivalry between towns. I hate PFC but without them we would have no one to hate.No real rivals. The others just arent the same!!
As we all know too well, your club dying is the worst nightmare come true and I feel sorry for genuine supporters. However, sometimes you have to make a moral choice... I did... I realised in the close season following the Cup Final v Arsenal that things were not right at our club.. I had the money for renewing 3 season tickets and decided not to..As Im involved in credit and finance it was apparent to me long before most Saints fans. I decided that while Lowe was there he would not get one more penny of my money. As much as it hurt I stayed away til he was gone. Sme of my friends and fellow fans chastised me, and at work one day we had arguments about it. I was reminded about the stadium etc etc to which my reply was... Trust me, while that man is in charge, one day soon we will have one of the finest stadiums in the lower leagues!!! This was met with laughter. It gives me no satisfaction to say I was right but I still feel I made the right choice. I was born and bred of Southampton pedigree and no matter what club had risen from the ashes of SFC in this city, I would have supported it (Thank God For Markus though!)

Time for the Skates to do the same and make a choice!
[quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?[/p][/quote]I bloody would. If we got bought by an arms dealer I think I would probably think twice about going to games. The only thing that makes stunts think twice about going to games is when their team becomes rubbish. Therein lies the difference between us. It's a thing called 'class'.[/p][/quote]Realise this as an old thread now but have to say my piece. I agree with Warrens... Football was invented in this great country and born out of rivalry between towns. I hate PFC but without them we would have no one to hate.No real rivals. The others just arent the same!! As we all know too well, your club dying is the worst nightmare come true and I feel sorry for genuine supporters. However, sometimes you have to make a moral choice... I did... I realised in the close season following the Cup Final v Arsenal that things were not right at our club.. I had the money for renewing 3 season tickets and decided not to..As Im involved in credit and finance it was apparent to me long before most Saints fans. I decided that while Lowe was there he would not get one more penny of my money. As much as it hurt I stayed away til he was gone. Sme of my friends and fellow fans chastised me, and at work one day we had arguments about it. I was reminded about the stadium etc etc to which my reply was... Trust me, while that man is in charge, one day soon we will have one of the finest stadiums in the lower leagues!!! This was met with laughter. It gives me no satisfaction to say I was right but I still feel I made the right choice. I was born and bred of Southampton pedigree and no matter what club had risen from the ashes of SFC in this city, I would have supported it (Thank God For Markus though!) Time for the Skates to do the same and make a choice! st1halo

1:00pm Mon 10 Sep 12

OSPREYSAINT says...

st1halo wrote:
St Retford wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
OSPREYSAINT wrote:
WobblyCat wrote:
warrens 76 wrote:
They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate







ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.
Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?
More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew!
Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them.

However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co...

Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.
To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?
I bloody would. If we got bought by an arms dealer I think I would probably think twice about going to games.

The only thing that makes stunts think twice about going to games is when their team becomes rubbish.

Therein lies the difference between us. It's a thing called 'class'.
Realise this as an old thread now but have to say my piece.
I agree with Warrens... Football was invented in this great country and born out of rivalry between towns. I hate PFC but without them we would have no one to hate.No real rivals. The others just arent the same!!
As we all know too well, your club dying is the worst nightmare come true and I feel sorry for genuine supporters. However, sometimes you have to make a moral choice... I did... I realised in the close season following the Cup Final v Arsenal that things were not right at our club.. I had the money for renewing 3 season tickets and decided not to..As Im involved in credit and finance it was apparent to me long before most Saints fans. I decided that while Lowe was there he would not get one more penny of my money. As much as it hurt I stayed away til he was gone. Sme of my friends and fellow fans chastised me, and at work one day we had arguments about it. I was reminded about the stadium etc etc to which my reply was... Trust me, while that man is in charge, one day soon we will have one of the finest stadiums in the lower leagues!!! This was met with laughter. It gives me no satisfaction to say I was right but I still feel I made the right choice. I was born and bred of Southampton pedigree and no matter what club had risen from the ashes of SFC in this city, I would have supported it (Thank God For Markus though!)

Time for the Skates to do the same and make a choice!
The important thing is, are you back in the fold? Have you got on the bus as we ride to an uncertain future? Nothing is guaranteed in this life. Not everyone posting on here is convinced that we have done enough yet as a Club, to secure our position in the Premier. What do you think? Profit, Status Quo or financial disaster yet again.
[quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]St Retford[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]OSPREYSAINT[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]WobblyCat[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]warrens 76[/bold] wrote: They hate us, we do not care much for them, however things are getting really messy over pompey way they really only have 3 months left max or are going to get carved up by the property developers.....whate ver our feelings they DO love their club...remember how close we came...not time to gloat, genuinely hope they get saved each club is the heart and soul of it's respective town,,maybe not Torquay.[/p][/quote]Fcuk em! There's a bit of a difference between the position we were in and the position they're in, again! Are you related to the Mansbridge Warrens?[/p][/quote]More Shirley Warren if taking pity on the blue phew![/p][/quote]Osprey, you would not make that statement if you knew me the name is Nicholls and in the 70's and 80's I have toed to toe it with them. However as an older fella we grow up...and I know and you know that their fans did not spend the money, anymore than we spent it under Lowe and co... Remember we ended up with Marcus, could have been the muppets running Coventry into the ground, then were would we be...2nd admin, end of.[/p][/quote]To be fair I was only having a tease, as far as Pompey are concerned I wish they would get the mess sorted out, I am not bothered how they do it, it is not my concern, but it is taking far too long and is just a distraction. There are a few skate posters that come on here just to annoy and stir things up, they get as good as they give, the rest of the Pompey supporters are very little different to the rest of us, they are in a mess, mostly not of their own making. When they won that FA Cup how many skate fans cared or knew how it was achived at the time? Would we be any different?[/p][/quote]I bloody would. If we got bought by an arms dealer I think I would probably think twice about going to games. The only thing that makes stunts think twice about going to games is when their team becomes rubbish. Therein lies the difference between us. It's a thing called 'class'.[/p][/quote]Realise this as an old thread now but have to say my piece. I agree with Warrens... Football was invented in this great country and born out of rivalry between towns. I hate PFC but without them we would have no one to hate.No real rivals. The others just arent the same!! As we all know too well, your club dying is the worst nightmare come true and I feel sorry for genuine supporters. However, sometimes you have to make a moral choice... I did... I realised in the close season following the Cup Final v Arsenal that things were not right at our club.. I had the money for renewing 3 season tickets and decided not to..As Im involved in credit and finance it was apparent to me long before most Saints fans. I decided that while Lowe was there he would not get one more penny of my money. As much as it hurt I stayed away til he was gone. Sme of my friends and fellow fans chastised me, and at work one day we had arguments about it. I was reminded about the stadium etc etc to which my reply was... Trust me, while that man is in charge, one day soon we will have one of the finest stadiums in the lower leagues!!! This was met with laughter. It gives me no satisfaction to say I was right but I still feel I made the right choice. I was born and bred of Southampton pedigree and no matter what club had risen from the ashes of SFC in this city, I would have supported it (Thank God For Markus though!) Time for the Skates to do the same and make a choice![/p][/quote]The important thing is, are you back in the fold? Have you got on the bus as we ride to an uncertain future? Nothing is guaranteed in this life. Not everyone posting on here is convinced that we have done enough yet as a Club, to secure our position in the Premier. What do you think? Profit, Status Quo or financial disaster yet again. OSPREYSAINT

2:36pm Mon 10 Sep 12

st1halo says...

Been back in the fold since the day Lowe left. I think Cortese is a shrewd man and will guide us to success to a point we never imagined, such is his ambition. And I think he will do it by balancing the books. Everyone is in a state of panic at the moment it seems, I think it will be a hard season and a period of consolidation. I dont go along with the thought that its fine to be a yoyo club... Finances would be ok but players would come and go and that causes problems in itself. Staying up is all we need to do at the moment and that will be fine. Wont be easy but we're definitely good enough. lets hope we get some luck too
Fans seem to make much of the wage structure but, if we are to get to where we want to go, it will have to be broken so makes sense to do it slowly, one star at a time!! until you have a team of stars!! but we wont get there on the cheap.
Im optomistic of the future and I think with NC in charge of the financial reins, things will be ok.. I know I'm happy now spending my money in the shop, on the terraces or wherever related to Saints.
I have never felt so confident in the club


STID
Been back in the fold since the day Lowe left. I think Cortese is a shrewd man and will guide us to success to a point we never imagined, such is his ambition. And I think he will do it by balancing the books. Everyone is in a state of panic at the moment it seems, I think it will be a hard season and a period of consolidation. I dont go along with the thought that its fine to be a yoyo club... Finances would be ok but players would come and go and that causes problems in itself. Staying up is all we need to do at the moment and that will be fine. Wont be easy but we're definitely good enough. lets hope we get some luck too Fans seem to make much of the wage structure but, if we are to get to where we want to go, it will have to be broken so makes sense to do it slowly, one star at a time!! until you have a team of stars!! but we wont get there on the cheap. Im optomistic of the future and I think with NC in charge of the financial reins, things will be ok.. I know I'm happy now spending my money in the shop, on the terraces or wherever related to Saints. I have never felt so confident in the club STID st1halo

5:11pm Mon 10 Sep 12

warrens 76 says...

st1halo wrote:
Been back in the fold since the day Lowe left. I think Cortese is a shrewd man and will guide us to success to a point we never imagined, such is his ambition. And I think he will do it by balancing the books. Everyone is in a state of panic at the moment it seems, I think it will be a hard season and a period of consolidation. I dont go along with the thought that its fine to be a yoyo club... Finances would be ok but players would come and go and that causes problems in itself. Staying up is all we need to do at the moment and that will be fine. Wont be easy but we're definitely good enough. lets hope we get some luck too
Fans seem to make much of the wage structure but, if we are to get to where we want to go, it will have to be broken so makes sense to do it slowly, one star at a time!! until you have a team of stars!! but we wont get there on the cheap.
Im optomistic of the future and I think with NC in charge of the financial reins, things will be ok.. I know I'm happy now spending my money in the shop, on the terraces or wherever related to Saints.
I have never felt so confident in the club


STID
good work fella!
[quote][p][bold]st1halo[/bold] wrote: Been back in the fold since the day Lowe left. I think Cortese is a shrewd man and will guide us to success to a point we never imagined, such is his ambition. And I think he will do it by balancing the books. Everyone is in a state of panic at the moment it seems, I think it will be a hard season and a period of consolidation. I dont go along with the thought that its fine to be a yoyo club... Finances would be ok but players would come and go and that causes problems in itself. Staying up is all we need to do at the moment and that will be fine. Wont be easy but we're definitely good enough. lets hope we get some luck too Fans seem to make much of the wage structure but, if we are to get to where we want to go, it will have to be broken so makes sense to do it slowly, one star at a time!! until you have a team of stars!! but we wont get there on the cheap. Im optomistic of the future and I think with NC in charge of the financial reins, things will be ok.. I know I'm happy now spending my money in the shop, on the terraces or wherever related to Saints. I have never felt so confident in the club STID[/p][/quote]good work fella! warrens 76

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree