Politics RSS Feed


Free swimming goes but Southampton to get £100,000 spin doctor instead


THOUSANDS of kids face the loss of free swimming sessions in Southampton under proposals to plug a £13m budget black hole.

Conservative council leaders want to axe a popular scheme that lets under 12s swim for free in three council pools – saving £160,000. They also plan to reject a Government grant to pay for free swimming to under-16s – intended as an Olympic 2012 legacy.

Portsmouth, Winchester and Eastleigh councils have already pledged to sign up to it.

But Southampton Tories complain the Government is only funding a quarter of the estimated £400,000 cost.

Free swimming was introduced for under sevens two years ago then extended to under 12s in April by a Lib-Lab budget coalition. Around 2,600 kids have registered.

Swimming groups and opposition councillors have slammed the plan.

Labour leisure spokesman Derek Burke said: “It’s absolute madness. I’m extremely disappointed. It’s a widely used opportunity for all young families to participate in sport. It’s another blow to obesity targets.”

Julia Passingham from Hampshire Amateur Swimming Association said: “It’s a necessity for primary school age. They need health and exercise and it builds life skills, and gets them into sport. Swimming lesson numbers are already going down because of the economic climate.”

Lib Dem group leader councillor Jill Baston said: “This is a backward step. On the one hand the Conservatives are saying how keen they are to increase activities for young people then they are making these cuts.”

Cabinet member for leisure Councillor John Hannides said the swimming scheme was not well established and had been introduced with little idea of the costs which were now “running away”.

“There is nothing to suggest there has been a significant increase in (pool) usage,” he said.

Cllr Hannides added: “With a very limited budget I felt it was better to secure all the swimming pool venues and keep them open. We are doing the best to support swimming across the city and to ensure access right across the city.”

Cllr Hannides said £300,000 was being invested in the Quays diving complex while Oaklands pool – threatened in pervious budget rounds – was costing £1,000 a day to keep open.

Finance chief Councillor Jeremy Moulton said Government funding for the under-16s scheme was “woefully inadequate” and unaffordable.

He said while swimming was an important skill it could be learnt through school swimming. Cllr Moulton said the Cabinet could reconsider its cuts if schools and the local health trust were prepared to help fill the funding gap.

The proposal is part of a consultation on next year’s budget. A full list of cuts and savings to give residents a below inflation council tax rise will not be published until January.

Tories have confirmed they will be introducing free swimming for over 60s from April with the help of two years of Government funding.

How the £13m budget gap is made up


■ £6.4m inflated cost of services not covered by government grant
■ £1.3m in lost income from landfill allowances and land charges because of housing collapse
■ £1.3m for council tax discount to pensioners and special constables
■ £1.3m for a private finance initiative to replace city’s street lights
■ £800,000 to maintain higher spending on road resurfacing
■ £1m set up costs for a scheme to rebuild city secondary schools
■ £1m for other new spending initiatives and costs

Comments(19)

Ian24 says...
11:03am Sat 25 Oct 08

If Brad cannot create his own "spin" while being paid £250,000 this must be prof enough he is not good enough. Complete disregard for the council tax payers again and again.
This 13m hole may have something to do with all the free council owned land given to large companies companies such as carnival and the west qauy opperators. I understand this adds up to about 13m. People with no ability always seek to spend more on consultants.

A Southampton resident says...
11:18am Sat 25 Oct 08

I think it is about time that the council were reminded that they are here to serve our needs and to run the city prudently.
Precisely who is going to be let down by this action (easy, the Southampton residents again) and who is going to benefit (also easy - the chief executive's pal)?
Bit of a no-brainer really.

Adrian Smith says...
11:28am Sat 25 Oct 08

"to improve the council’s public image"

Not wasting £100K on a professional liar would help.

southy says...
11:59am Sat 25 Oct 08

tut tut Adrian Smith this is politics,your not allowed to call them liars,even lo thats what they are in a way,you must refer to them has misleading the truth and hiding the true facts

Northamboy says...
12:15pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Could the last person out of Southampton please remember to switch the lights off!

Chief executive Brad Roynon should be sacked for suggesting such a thing. When will he start to do what he's paid for and serve the people of Southampton? Sack him now!




Georgem says...
1:23pm Sat 25 Oct 08

I think it is about time that the council were reminded that they are here to serve our needs and to run the city prudently.


Very well said! Same applies to every politician in the country. Revolution, anyone?

Paramjit Bahia says...
2:06pm Sat 25 Oct 08

I fail to understand how destroying the enjoyment of small kids and wasting money on adding one more fat cat to the over crowded and expensive 'Zoo of Directors' will improve the image of this Council.

They should in fact be improving the services, which are being cut, stop wasting money on massive wage bill of top dogs, provide decent wage to ordinary workers and be accountable to the citizens of Southampton.

If the overpaid Chief Executive cannot communicate properly with his pay masters, the people, he should be shown the door. Wasting money on creating another clone of Mandelson is madness.

bunneymen says...
2:07pm Sat 25 Oct 08

How about owning up to their mistakes in an honest way and putting in place working practices to ensure they are not repeated, that would improve their image in my eyes. Does that mean I can claim part of that 100k?

southy says...
2:16pm Sat 25 Oct 08

welcome back Paramjit Bahia i hope all your problems have been sorted.is there any way you might be able to talk to jack and get him to post on here.

Georgem a revolution maybe whats needed i not to fuss if the crown stays or go's just has long the politician's are changed or change in there thinking and what they do

RJG says...
2:32pm Sat 25 Oct 08

This so-called 'black-hole' only exists because the Tories want to give their ridiculous council tax discount to rich pensioners who don't need it. As well as the lost revenue, there are all the associated costs of bureaucracy, because this makes the administration of council tax as a whole more complicated. The only people the Tories have to blame for their current financial position are themselves.

obelisker says...
2:34pm Sat 25 Oct 08

southy wrote:
tut tut Adrian Smith this is politics,your not allowed to call them liars,even lo thats what they are in a way,you must refer to them has misleading the truth and hiding the true facts
MP's cannot call each other liars within the confines of the Commons, and outside for fear of a law suit, but I can..POLITICIANS ARE ALL LIARS OUT TO LINE THEIR OWN POCKETS, there you go..sue me Brad.

Lone Ranger says...
2:42pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Well done the Council you are sinking all most as low as your pathetic Tory peers in Westminster. Lets hope that you pathetic mob are dumped when the first opportunity presents itself. God help us if you lot ever run the Country again you are bad enough at a loval level. I wonder why you never come out defend your decisions that wreck our lives. One word SPLINELESS

goard says...
2:48pm Sat 25 Oct 08

I have a feeling that the Council want to raise our ire so that they can say amongst themselves ' such a load of tossers,lets ignore them.' I would like to say we see a very distasteful, very arrogant team who represent us in a disgraceful way and you have little respect from the people of Southampton. I want to point out to all those deciding what plans are for Southampton that they have, over the last few years, deliberately gone over our heads, and are in a bubble of self importance which we will never let you rest.

goard

southy says...
2:57pm Sat 25 Oct 08

ok we now need to raise funds for obelisker defence in a law suit lol

Rob444 says...
3:04pm Sat 25 Oct 08

How much longer can the tories cling on to power in Southampton.

The list of failings is growing almost daily.

The council leaders seem to have lost sight of the fact that WE pay their wages and they are there to carry out OUR wishes.


Condor Man says...
5:19pm Sat 25 Oct 08

Rob444 wrote:
How much longer can the tories cling on to power in Southampton. The list of failings is growing almost daily. The council leaders seem to have lost sight of the fact that WE pay their wages and they are there to carry out OUR wishes.
2 years because there are no elections in 2010

newjerseychick says...
9:26pm Sat 25 Oct 08

swimming, libraries, childrens art at the gallery?
It goes on and on ......


Quite Frankly says...
11:07pm Sat 25 Oct 08

They will not be satisfied until they have emptied the trough.

Condor Man says...
11:22pm Sat 25 Oct 08

in 10 years my council tax has more than doubled yet my wages haven't. Although it's sad to lose services we have to be realistic. If the tax take drops due to rising unemployment it will be grossly unfair to burden those still in work with higher council tax to pay for services that only a minority are entitled to.

It seems that people are too quick to criticise but slow to put their hands in their pockets when the true costs are revealed.

Perhaps if the wages weren't so low in the city we'd have a better place to live in. Alas we don't so it's a case of make do and mend at the moment.


Free kids swimming axed.... Free kids swimming axed....

Most popular






Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses